Why was a Knight of the ‘Realm’ brought in to railroad a valid TGBMS negligence claim?
In this episode of the RogueCast, I revisit the significant matter of my tort of negligence lawsuit against my former friend and conveyancing solicitor and examine why a Knight in the shape of a former Solicitor General of Blair government was airlifted into the preside over what turned out to be a miscarriage of justice.
“When individuals begin to think for themselves and drop the phoney notion that those in positions of so-called authority are always correct, then the writing is on the wall for all those false believers in the God of the State who mistakenly rely upon the fallacy of the appeal to authority.
For these reasons, the discerning reader is encouraged to focus on the facts of this matter. A sanitised copy of the Claimant’s Statement of Case is attached below in order to illustrate the nature of a valid negligence claim that was unrebutted in court and therefore stands as one which may be used as a template for any mortgagor who has had his home stolen as a consequence of him being falsely advised by his conveyancing solicitor that the mortgage agreement and deed were valid when they were self-evidently nothing less than a lie put to paper.Wherefore, on Friday, 27 February, 2015, at the Queen’s Bench sitting at Nottingham County Court before Mr Justice Cranston, it was established that a mortgagor who has been negligently and falsely advised that his mortgage agreement with the purported lender was legal has a valid cause of action for a damages claim against that individual under the tort of negligence, if he makes it within 15 years of the negligence.
Background
Following the failure of the Defendant (a conveyancing solicitor who was paid for his legal advice by the Claimant over a mortgage agreement and deed which both were subsequently proven to be void) to settle a self-evidently valid Negligence Claim by way of private settlement via his professional indemnification insurance policy, a tort of negligence claim was filed at Nottingham County Court on 25 October, 2014, against the negligent solicitor and three other defendants who had been drawn into the insurance fraud.
The Defendants failed to file a defence within the 28 days and, instead, made an unmeritorious application on 28 November for the negligence claim to be dismissed.
A hearing was scheduled for 23 January, 2015. When HHJ Nigel Godsmark, the senior Judge at Nottingham County Court realised that he knew the first three defendants (all solicitors, operating out of a firm in the city), he recused himself from the proceedings…”
The original article can be read in full here.
Being far removed from the Knights of old and their chivalric code, I also explain how this bogus Knight, Sir Ross Cranston, sitting in the Queen’s Bench, ignored the facts, misrepresented the law and subsequently issued a void order.
Watch here on Rumble
Please like, share and comment and consider making a donation should you appreciate this content.
This is the referenced Tort of Negligence Claim that established the facts to the matter:
All suspect solicitors should be reported via complaint to The Law Society in any event.
I sued a solicitor for loosing Deeds of our house and didn’t inform us until we were to complete on sale! Turned out we were not the only ones who did so.
The Solicitor’s Regulation Authority (SRA) is the one to complain to. However, it is also to be remembered that when a soicitor has been negilgent, then a Tort Claim may be issued against them, as was the case here. Remember too, a claim against a solicitor’s professional inddemnification policy has a an enormous effect on their insurance premium, in the same way the price of cover gets ramped up when a motorist has an accident.