An eye witness account and overview of the criminality of the state’s terrorist attack on the Crawford Family.

Background: UKAR [United Kingdom Assets Resolution] is an agency created to run down the mortgage books of the two bailed out banks, Northern Rock and Bradford and Bingley.

It is Treasury owned, which means it is under the control of the Crown House of Rothschild.

Said House of Rothschild took over the financial controls of these lands after the battle of Waterloo, 200 years ago.


Some, quite reasonably, suggest that the British peoples have been enslaved to the Rothschilds since that time by way of its monopolisation of the financial system in all its forms.

History demonstrates that all empires rise and fall, usually lasting for around 200 years.

So, the Treasury runs UKAR, of which Richard Pym, former CEO of the failed bank known as the Bradford and Bingley is the current head.

The Bradford and Bingley exists in name only. Most of its alleged mortgages have been sold on via a number of Special Purpose Vehicles on whose behalf it collects the payments.

Thus, when it brings a claim against a mortgagor, it a fraudulent one, on the grounds that it is no longer the holder of the alleged mortgage. In order to initiate its fraudulent claims, it employs ‘legal’ officers who work for a number of debt collection agencies who masquerade as solicitors to sign perjurious witness statements alleging moneys are owed on a balance that is never verified, the evidence of the alleged debt being nothing more than computer generated statements which only show one side of the accounting. Walker Morris of Leeds, DrydensFairfax of Bradford and the company Eversheds are three of the most notoriously aggressive debt collectors/solicitors UKAR/THE CROWN TREASURY uses to initiate the fake claims.

It is a matter of accounting fact that each and every mortgagor is, by way of the signed mortgage application form and deed of mortgage, a creditor of the bank. In a fiat currency system of credit, this is how the system works via the promise to pay and its associated deed.

All signed loan, credit card application forms and mortgage applications create credits which may be used for purchasing anything from a bicycle to a house.

In the simplest of terms, all that ever takes place with these purported loans is a credit exchange. If one many gives another a cheque for £100 and is given back the same amount is cash, has any loan taken place? No. It is self-evidently nothing more than an exchange/swap of one form of credit for another.

This is the essence of the Great British Mortgage Swindle – the deposit of the mortgage application form in a special (hidden) account from which the line of credit is streamed in order to facilitate the purchase of the house is all that is happening.

The conveyancing solicitor gives illegal advice when he instructs the individual to execute the mortgage deed on a house that is not his at the time he signs. Furthermore, he then materially alters the legal document when he adds the date at a later time. Thus, the solicitor commits an act of forgery by materially altering the (void) deed of mortgage which is registered by him at the Land Registry.

The whole transaction should be indivisible, as established in September, 2014 in the Supreme Court when Lady Hale stated as much in Scott v Southern Pacific Mortgages & Others [2014] UKSC 52 when she said it most plainly:

The purchaser was not in a position either at the date of exchange of contracts or at any time up until completion of the purchase to confer equitable proprietary” and “This case has been decided on the simple basis that the purchaser of land cannot create a proprietary interest in the land, which is capable of being an overriding interest, until his contract has been completed.”

Subsequent to this, the bank falsely claims that a loan has been made. The conveyancing solicitor, the broker and all agents involved in the fraud are paid a handsome commission for their efforts in the procuration of void deed of mortgage. Thus, the duped individual becomes a ‘mortgagor’ and an accessory in the fraud since he has been falsely advised by his solicitor that it is legal to grant a charge over a property that is not his at the time he signs it.

He is then further duped into making interest payments on a false loan, usually in good faith, as he falsely believes that the bank has actually made available funds to him from its own coffers and that he is morally bound to ‘repay’ them.




What happened at the Crawford family home last Thursday, July 02, 2015 is, ultimately, reliant upon a valid debt being owed. However, when Nigel Godsmark issued his (unapproved) judgement following the hearing of 01 May, 2015, it was confirmed that the amount being claimed could not be verified as all its barrister, Nicole Sandells, had to substantiate it was a computer generated print out of a statement for an amount which could not be proven. In any event, the original loan had been paid off many times over by Sue and Tom. Nevertheless, in an act of utter terrorism against the Crawfords, the Crown Treasury/Ukar/the Government conspired through its lapdog solicitors known as Walker Morris of Leeds, to arrange the attack when they knew that both Tom and his son Craig would be absent, leaving Sue in the house on her own. This attack was planned weeks in advance, as confirmed by Robert Taylor, a man acting a inspector for and on behalf of Notts Police.


Hired unidentified mercenaries were employed by the Court, whose bailiffs were evidently not in attendance, to violently steal the family home. A fence was smashed down and the burglars broke in through the back door – an act which was not only criminal but also one of terrorism on Sue, a woman on her own. Previously, on 23 July 2014 and on 23 January 2015, hundreds of people had turned up in support of the Crawfords to prevent an unlawful eviction taking place. On both occasions, neither the bailiffs nor the police had the courage to show. This time, however, the cowards treacherously conspired to effect a massive operation, codenamed, ‘Hooper’ on the family, with the discredited Notts Police, under the aegis of Chris Eyre and its ‘Commissioner’, Paddy Tipping working as a state-corporate privately hired police force. [HIRE OF NOTTS POLICE LINK]

It is fair to say that without the unlawful assistance of the police in a matter that is civil, no eviction, no burglary, no criminal damage, no theft and no wanton destruction would have happened.

It is also worth noting that, despite repeated requests, no signed and sealed warrant was produced. Therefore, the lawful presumption is that it does not exist. This has been demonstrated to be the case time after time when any mortgagor demands to see the instrument by which he is being evicted.

This necessarily means that any and all agents who were involved in the conspiracy to violently steal the home and its private contents are culpable and thus liable for the resulting criminal actions that were witnessed by the people, the public of these lands, whether on video or personally.

Therefore, the CEO of the Crown Treasury, the CEO of UKAR, Richard Pym, the Chief Constable of Notts Police ‘Force’, Chris Eyre, and each and every attendant man falsely acting as a constable, Nigel Godsmark, Nottingham County Court staff, its bailiffs, the hired mercenaries who burgled the house in broad daylight (whilst the men acting as constables stood by and thus aided and abetted) and Liam Bird, the owner of ‘Cooksons Removals’ in Lytham St Annes, near Blackpool and, any and all agents acting out of the notorious ‘Walker Morris’ solicitors of Leeds have entered into a criminal conspiracy against the Crawfords which amounted to an act of terrorism against not just the Crawfords, but the peoples of these lands.


In other words, this was nothing less than state-sanctioned terrorism – an unconscionable action designed to instil fear in all those who dare to question the very mechanics of the monetary system, whose secrets ‘cannot be revealed’ because without it, the entire edifice of financial control would fall away.

TERRORISM: ter·ror·ism (tĕr′ə-rĭz′əm) n. The use of violence or the threat of violence, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political goals.

“Upon the evidence, every police officer who assisted in the violent attack on the Crawfords home on 05 July, 2015 committed crimes ancillary to genocide, under long-established conventions of international law. This is not a one-off occurrence – it is a matter of government policy. The crimes must therefore also be considered acts of violence, conceived and carried out to achieve the political aim of suppressing civilian resistance to financial tyranny – terrorism by definition.

The numerous, luminous pirates who stole the family’s property are criminally liable for trespass and theft; and personally liable for the enforcement of a plainly fraudulent claim, which was violently enforced without a valid court order or warrant for possession, in multiple breaches of due process of law. These individuals are also culpable as ancillaries to genocide.

The bank’s directors and its legal representatives are criminally liable for fraud by false representation, non-disclosure and abuse of position, under sections 2, 3 and 4 of the Fraud Act 2006, since they lied under oath to Nottingham County Court about the amount alleged to be due and outstanding, for their own financial gain, as even the judge who lifted the stay on a non-existent warrant for possession was forced to concede on May 1st 2015.

By their despicable, cowardly and foolish actions, the accused have proven beyond reasonable doubt that justice is not possible to obtain within the overtly corporatist police state which has been imposed upon us by stealth, even in the event one wins the legal argument in a dispute with any vested interest of the Crown House of Rothschild. The time for the people to seek their own remedies, as predicted by Lord Denning, has undoubtedly arrived, along with the dull thud of one hundred statist jackboots marching to a street near you, in order to “prevent a breach of the peace”.

The inherent tragedy of this genocidal sick ‘game’ known as The Great British Mortgage Swindle is that people’s homes are being stolen on the false pretence that moneys are owed when, in fact, the opposite is the case.

Not that this prevents the assorted paid shills, naysayers and fuckwits from having their ‘two penneth’ and falsely claiming that Tom lost his court case and therefore ‘had it coming to him’. RM will not name them as such individuals are as inconsequential as a pile of cow dung that one may step into whilst out on a walk.

Tom did not ‘lose’ his court case: he won it and the facts behind the creation of the mortgage swindle back up that claim.

In the final instant, and this is the point, the naysayers, shills and supporters of the status consistently overlook: all the state in the shape of UKAR and its hired mercenaries had in the final instance was violent criminality.

Thus, on Thursday, 02 July, 2015, the lawlessness and immorality of the corporate-state was there for all to see. It was the jackboot of fascism that prevailed: nothing whatsoever to do with the pretence of Tom being given a fair hearing and the judge Godsmark providing a competent judgement. State apologists rely entirely on the false pretence the judge was fair and unbiased.

Further to this, of course, if it was lawful, then where was the notice to Tom and his family of the eviction date? Where was the verified value being claimed? Where was the warrant? Would they have dared to come near if support had been mobilised?

Such individuals who gloat in the tragedy reveal themselves to be not only myopic but also unwitting mouthpieces and thus advocates for the state-corporatism that is rampant across these lands right now. The police were privately hired by the Crown Treasury for whom, of course, ‘money’ or credit is available in infinite qualities.

Given the undeniable truth that there is no remedy in the House of Rothschild controlled Court System, the only one left standing for the people of these lands is the formation of Grand Juries in each of those communities where such lawlessness as prevailed last Thursday has occurred.

The power lies with the people – a fact that the so-called Establishment know full well and a fact they are truly frightened of. The treachery of the Treasury’s military attack on the Crawford family was a deliberate act of terrorism, designed to inject fear into the minds and hearts of the people of the British Isles, who regardless of what anyone may wrongly claim, are self-evidently being subjected to genocide by the State whose policies are blatantly in breach of international law:

“The crime of genocide is defined in international law in the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide.

“Article II: In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Article III: The following acts shall be punishable:

(a) Genocide;

(b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;

(c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;

(d) Attempt to commit genocide;

(e) Complicity in genocide.

The Genocide Convention was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 9 December 1948. The Convention entered into force on 12 January 1951. More than 130 nations have ratified the Genocide Convention and over 70 nations have made provisions for the punishment of genocide in domestic criminal law. The text of Article II of the Genocide Convention was included as a crime in Article 6 of the 1998 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.
Punishable Acts

The following are genocidal acts when committed as part of a policy to destroy a group’s existence:

Killing members of the group includes direct killing and actions causing death.

Causing serious bodily or mental harm includes inflicting trauma on members of the group through widespread torture, rape, sexual violence, forced or coerced use of drugs, and mutilation.

Deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to destroy a group includes the deliberate deprivation of resources needed for the group’s physical survival, such as clean water, food, clothing, shelter or medical services. Deprivation of the means to sustain life can be imposed through confiscation of harvests, blockade of foodstuffs, detention in camps, forcible relocation or expulsion into deserts.

Prevention of births includes involuntary sterilization, forced abortion, prohibition of marriage, and long-term separation of men and women intended to prevent procreation.

Forcible transfer of children may be imposed by direct force or by through fear of violence, duress, detention, psychological oppression or other methods of coercion. The Convention on the Rights of the Child defines children as persons under the age of 14 years.

Genocidal acts need not kill or cause the death of members of a group. Causing serious bodily or mental harm, prevention of births and transfer of children are acts of genocide when committed as part of a policy to destroy a group’s existence:

It is a crime to plan or incite genocide, even before killing starts, and to aid or abet genocide: Criminal acts include conspiracy, direct and public incitement, attempts to commit genocide, and complicity in genocide.”  source


The public outrage at this attack has inevitably been tempered by the false reporting of the state controlled media who wrongly claim that those in attendance were ‘protestors’. No. Each and every member of the public who attended last Thursday was attempting to prevent a crime being committed. They may have been outnumbered but they were genuinely attempting to prevent the theft of private property from the scene of the crime whilst the bovine police, having utter contempt for the people and being in clear breach of their oaths to protect and serve the people, actually aided and abetted in the criminal action by way of their refusal to investigate the issue of the non-existent warrant and, of course, by denying the public access to the scene of the crime as it was unfolding behind the massed ranks of the day-glow-jacketed hired dupes.

In this regard alone, they demonstrated that they are clearly unfit for purpose. Chris Eyre and Paddy Tipping should offer their resignations immediately for they too are complicit in the genocidal attack on the Crawford family, as are the two men, Taylor and Paul Winter, who were acting as ‘inspectors’.

Robert Taylor - refused provide evidence of a valid warrant.
Robert Taylor – failed to provide evidence of a valid warrant.

The man known as Robert Taylor was asked to investigate whether the warrant was valid on the basis it had to be signed by a judge and stamped by the court, with a verifiable amount being claimed. Given the fact that he was unable to produce it, and that Tom himself repeatedly asked to see it for himself without result, the lawful presumption is that it did not exist. This, is further evidence of the criminal nature of the violent theft of the house. What he failed to mention of course, is that the entire criminal action was carried out under the guise, ‘Operation Hooper’. However, he did admit that it was planned in advance, by two or more unknown individuals which, of course, is the very definition of a conspiracy to commit a crime.

Another fact that the complicit agencies of the state attempted to conceal was that, according to Tom’s own first hand knowledge, the robbers who were committing the crime were doing so under the false pretence that they were Nottingham County Court bailiffs. There were at least two dozen of them, a cadre of men, largely, it would appear, desperate types who will do anything for the meagre amounts of money they were being paid to carry out the theft. Some had ‘door licences’ and other fake ‘security’ documentation.

So, why does it appear that there were no bailiffs from Nottingham County Court? Why were all those involved from outside the county?

Of course, the answer is simple: no one acting from inside the county as a bailiff had the balls to do it, such are the genuine levels of public support for the Crawford clan, a family that has and continues to remain indomitable and united throughout this time, often in the face of vitriolic and aggressively unmerited ad hominem attacks against them. Those who gloat that ‘they got what was coming to them’ are quite simply, beneath contempt such are the levels of immorality which they demonstrate each and every time these assorted key-board warriors and shills open their fetid mouths or type out a sentence on a public website or forum.

In any event, in the complete absence of due process of the law, the power now shifts into the hands of the people. Each and every one of the four individuals who were unlawfully arrested as they tried to prevent the theft of stolen property from leaving the scene of the crime, will be exonerated on the basis they were violently attacked by criminal police, men whose names have been taken and who will shortly face the consequences of their crimes.

In the meantime, RM salutes the indefatigable Tom, Sue, Nicole, Craig and Amanda of the Crawford family whose unity and strength is so palpably lacking in many families these days. And tribute is paid too to the valiant souls who stood up for what is right in the face of the fake police, each of whom represented the very opposite of that. Your fortitude, strength and courage is an inspiration to all right-minded people

The battle may have been won last Thursday but, being founded on treachery, deceit and fraud it is a hollow one. The war of the people against the Banks continues.

Email this to someoneShare on Facebook0Share on Google+0Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn2