RM has written previously about how eviction is an act of genocide. Most right thinking individuals will regard Israel’s evictions of the Palestinian peoples and the violent theft of their lands as genocide but few will stop to consider how the British Establishment is similarly engaging in acts of genocide against its own people across these lands. Before continuing, the reader, if he isn’t already aware of it, should consider the contents of these articles – here and here.

An eviction is also an act of plunder, carried out by agents of the state, which in turn, is controlled by the Banksters – a provably criminal cadre, operating under the aegis of the House of Rothschild.

plunder |ˈpləndər|

verb [ with obj. ]

steal goods from (a place or person), typically using force and in a time of war or civil disorder: looters moved into the disaster area to plunder stores | [ no obj. ] : the invaders were back and ready to plunder.

• steal (goods), typically using force and in a time of disorder.

• take material from (artistic or academic work) for one’s own purposes: we shall plunder related sciences to assist our research.


the violent and dishonest acquisition of property: the farmers suffered the inhumanity and indignities of pillage and plunder.

• property acquired illegally and violently: the army sacked the city and carried off huge quantities of plunder.


plunderer |ˈplənd(ə)rər| noun


mid 17th cent.: from German plündern, literally ‘rob of household goods,’ from Middle High German plunder ‘household effects.’ Early use of the verb was with reference to the Thirty Years’ War (1618–48), reflecting German usage; on the outbreak of the English Civil War in 1642, the word and activity were associated with the forces under Prince Rupert.

When we do not learn the lessons of history, we are destined to repeat them. Frederick Bastiat was an eloquent historian and philosopher who knew this all too well. He writes not of theory but of facts. When a government and its judiciary are engaged in acts of plunder against its peoples, the results, as demonstrated time and time again by history, are palpable. The facts are stark.

Frederick Bastiat
Frederick Bastiat


“No legal plunder: This is the principle of justice, peace, order, stability, harmony, and logic. Until the day of my death, I shall proclaim this principle with all the force of my lungs (which alas! is all too inadequate).”

“The Results of Legal Plunder

It is impossible to introduce into society a greater change and a greater evil than this: the conversion of the law into an instrument of plunder.

What are the consequences of such a perversion? It would require volumes to describe them all. Thus we must content ourselves with pointing out the most striking.

In the first place, it erases from everyone’s conscience the distinction between justice and injustice.

No society can exist unless the laws are respected to a certain degree. The safest way to make laws respected is to make them respectable. When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law. These two evils are of equal consequence, and it would be difficult for a person to choose between them.

The nature of law is to maintain justice. This is so much the case that, in the minds of the people, law and justice are one and the same thing. There is in all of us a strong disposition to believe that anything lawful is also legitimate. This belief is so widespread that many persons have erroneously held that things are “just” because law makes them so. Thus, in order to make plunder appear just and sacred to many consciences, it is only necessary for the law to decree and sanction it. Slavery, restrictions, and monopoly find defenders not only among those who profit from them but also among those who suffer from them.”  SOURCE

We are living in such times. If any one doubts this, then they are not paying attention. The following image of the Tory Cabinet serves as a wake up call to any one who doubts we are living under a kleptocracy of the most obvious kind. Each of the cabinet members is a millionaire. Quite how and why each believes himself to be suited to govern over others is left to the reader to speculate but it is plain to state such individuals have no care or interest in the well-being of the people of these lands.


In the meantime, the masses of people are distracted by a sting operation which hits a number of men who are involved in the circus of distraction known as football.

I write at a time when the British press is agog over a series of sting operations performed by undercover Daily Telegraph ‘journalists’ on a number of British football managers and coaches. The secretly filmed episodes invariably reveal a world of bungs, hidden player ownership by third parties, overpaid footballers, inflated salaries and out-of-control egos. Sam Allardyce is, thus far, the biggest fish to be caught in the net.

Many have been stating for years that corruption lies at the heart of Britain’s ‘national sport’ and this sting operation is the proof of it: it amounts to plunder:

“The fragmented cartel of corrupting forces destroying the integrity of British football are making a fortune out of their systemic conspiracy.

Contacts within FIFA, UEFA, the bookmaking sectors of SE Asia and Europe as well as our cellular network reckon that between £6 billion and £24 billion was conspiratorially laundered via match fixing in EPL last season.”  SOURCE

Some journalists have even claimed that this is a vindication of British journalism, a fine example of how skilful undercover sleuthing can get to the heart of the matter and reveal the inherent charade for what it is.

However,  RM would have to disagree with that on the simple basis that British mainstream ‘journalism’ is wholly controlled by its owners, establishment figures like the creepy Rupert Murdoch, whose editors keep a firm grip on what does and doesn’t get published.  Political tones are largely superficial, the Guardian is as full of spurious information and conventional opinion as the Telegraph, the Mirror as full of gossip as the Mail, etc etc.

No. The mainstream press is dead in the water. A dead duck, a pathetic version of what once may have existed but now is no more. Namely, investigative journalism.

RM is not one to blow his own trumpet and would hardly describe himself as a journalist. Nevertheless, the contents of this site do serve as first hand testimony to his experiences and insights. The research of others outside the mainstream provides the depth that is so blatantly lacking in the press and other mainstream media (MSM).

Perhaps the last truly investigative TV programme was the BBC’s ‘Rough Justice’ – a series that delved into the ever-fruitful world of Her Majesty’s Courts to uncover a plethora of miscarriages of justice. It so piqued the establishment that the Attorney General erroneously attacked its methods and the stalwart of the justice system, Lord Denning, even went so far as to state it was deplorable that the British justice system was being portrayed in such a light when it was crucial that the commonly held view of it as the best in the world was maintained at all costs, even to the detriment of those who had suffered gross injustices at its hands.

Such a view is utterly deplorable as it amounts to nothing less than an establishment cover up.

The investigative journalists who worked on the programme were eventually hounded out as a result of pressure from the government and the judiciary and it went into decline before disappearing from tv screens in 2007.

Thus, whilst it is okay to expose the dubious workings of the rigged world of the football industry in Britain and elsewhere, it is less acceptable to the controllers to use the same techniques to expose the nefarious activities of the elite – whether it be a chancellor snorting cocaine, a Labour mp engaging in activity with rent boys, systemic corruption amongst politicians and their expenses, the selling of arms to Arab countries, the genocide of benefit cuts, the murky dealings of the Royal Family, money laundering by HSBC or the effects of zionism and/or usury on the peoples of the world – so those investigations invariably do not begin or get covered up to be spun out like the Chilcot Report into years of fake scrutiny by the very members of the same establishment that is under investigation.

So, the Telegraph journalists use their investigative powers to delve into the murky world of the industry known as football but why do they not put said powers to a more pressing issue, like the fraudulent operations of the money changers?  And yet, there are some among them who are wakening to the truth :

“ All these guys care about is money. They don’t care about society. They certainly don’t care about jobs and they don’t care about you.

OK, you might say, but this has always been going on. But it hasn’t. This sort of utterly amoral screw-everyone capitalism has become much more prevalent in the last 15 years. Our financial elite is now totally out of control. They learned nothing from the crisis, except that the rest of us were stupid enough to give them a second chance. And, now, having plucked all the “low hanging fruit,” they’re destroying the middle classes for profit.

Our current problems have their roots in the early 80s. While much of what Reagan and Thatcher did was necessary, the trouble is that they set a deregulatory train in motion which, over the last couple of decades has dismantled so much of the legal framework that protected us from greedy scuzzballs.”  Alex Proud, The Telegraph

The Wells Fargo banking fraud is a massive story – one of fake accounts, fraudulent debts and paltry fines that go to the coffers of the Rothschild controlled Federal Reserve and not into the pockets of those whose names have been stolen and used for profiteering:

“Reality Check: How Does Nobody Go To Jail In Wells Fargo Case After over 1.2 Million People Were Defrauded? And Why No Matter What Other Crimes The Bank Committed, They Have Been Granted Immunity!” SOURCE

By way of illustration of the genocide and plunder that is eviction, let’s take a look at the Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML) own figures for ‘repossessions’ (evictions) for the UK from 2008 to the present. The following table shows that in those eight years there has been 262,000 evictions. Many of those homes will have been family homes.

REPOSSESSION FIGURES 2008-2016, Council of Mortgage Lenders.
REPOSSESSION FIGURES 2008-2016, Council of Mortgage Lenders.

If there’s an average of 4 people per household, that figure stands at around 1,048,000 men, women and children evicted from 2008 to 2016.

And on it goes – plunder and genocide by banking cartels and their puppets in government and the judiciary, all backed up by the order followers known as bailiffs and police, each of whom remains individually culpable for their part in #TheGreatBritishMortgageSwindle.

In every sense, this story is self-evidently a bigger and more important issue than the antics of those largely unintelligent greedy ring masters who play around in the Circus known as ‘professional football’.


Conclusion: the print media is currently unfit for purpose. All it deals in is gossip and superficiality  – the age-old bread and circus game of distracting the masses from the more important issues. There are, by the CML’s own figures, some 11.2 million mortgaged properties in the UK, each of which has a void charge hanging over it. A void charge that has been falsely registered at the Land Registry.

As and when the middle classes wake up to the swindle, then said Land Registry will be deluged in a tsunami of applications for each of those void charges to be removed. The people will bite back, just as Bastiat says,

“It is impossible to introduce into society a greater change and a greater evil than this: the conversion of the law into an instrument of plunder.”

That is manifestly where we are at and the upcoming theatrical release of #TGBMS will go some way to redressing the balance.

We began with a quotation by a Frenchman, so let’s end with another (from a surprising source) which is as relevant now as it was 201 years ago:

”When a government is dependent upon bankers for money, they and not the leaders of the government control the situation, since the hand that gives is above the hand that takes… Money has no motherland; financiers are without patriotism and decency; their sole object is gain.”

– Napoleon Bonaparte, Emperor of France 1815.

In the meantime, this autumn will mark the release of a cinematic investigation into the genocide of eviction. To book a place at a screening near you, please visit this site, TGBMS.

Acknowledgements: Many thanks to Jan B and Rhys J for their kind donations. Any reader who appreciates the work of RM is invited to make a donation via the button in the right hand column of this site.  



  1. Very poignant (edited) article. Considering that there is no lawful money of account nor unit of measure since the government bankruptcy of 1930 and the technical dislocation of gold from currency in Sept 1931 with the Amendment to the Gold Standard Act, when they effectively abolished the lawful money of account.

    This is evidenced by the notes in your wallet that carry an entirely fraudulent “promises to pay” so fraudulent that the government do not use these notes!


    Because they are nothing more than vouchers, no different from supermarket vouchers, they have no intrinsic inherent value and only carry worth, that worth reflects our labour as these vouchers are provided for our use, created as debt notes on you promises “to pay” (by your labour) their mortgage, that they have the gaul to call a “loan” by private banks for the exchange of goods and services.

    As such these vouchers ARE a government benefit!

    When will people wake up to this scam and the fact they are simply stealing your real world assestes for their claimed fictional monopoly game fraudulent “MONEY”

    The real question we should be asking is why, o’ why are they created as debt notes and not credit notes? As the only thing of with is our labour.

    1. Hi, Colin and thanks for the comment. The questions are most pertinent. There is, of course, nothing to stop the people creating their own medium of exchange. Bitcoin and OneCoin being just two examples of the emerging alternatives to the privately issued debt notes (as you correctly identify the Bank of England notes to be). Money remains the world’s biggest religion – no one know where and how it is created, yet they all believe unquestioningly in its ‘magic’ properties.

      1. Hi can you correct:
        effectively abaskingd the lawful money should have read: abolished

        And on the last line should read only things of worth. Thanks. On my phone.

        Some of us know exactly where and how it’s created, and everything about it is a huge scam to keep all the power and wealth concentrated in those who truly believe they have a right rule, From royal house holds down, it no coincidence that all US presidents and most Prime ministers related to Royality.
        Funny that the governments don’t print the fraudulent benefit debt based vouchers but have delegated that function to their pall’s the bankers, Rotheschilds and the likes and the the shareholders are the usual subjects of course, the Queen and associated cronies.

        The 1930 bankruptcy agreed at the Geneva convention of that year is a nation secret, they don’t want you the public to know they robbed you, stole the peoples gold from 1912 to 1931

        But the biggest secret they don’t want you realising is that these vouchers are not lawful money of account and are provided as a Government BENEFIT!

        That’s a huge key, eight there to unlocking this door.

        A BENEFIT, lookup UCC 1-308 then consider this benefit in that light to get a starting point on the massive fraud they perpetuated on the people when they ABOLISHED the peoples lawful money of account without disclosure.

        Can you pay interest on a benefit?

        Can you demand that I accept or use or apply for a benefit?

        If I don’t comply with your demands in relation to this benefit is it lawful that the councils, Inland revenue, goverment and banks can throw me on the street to die and take my home, making me homeless?

        …and as the government is BANKRUPT how can they bankrupt you for failing to give up these 3rd party private clearly fraudulent promises to pay vouchers by making you Bankrupt?

        How can you pay a debt with a debt?

        The word I think you may be looking for is slavery or maybe just indentured servitude.

        Prior to 1930 the people held lawful money of account, they held the wealth and so they had power.

        Now a small group of people hold all the cards but they do so by fraud and diseption, not to mention the downright lies.

        George Osborne:
        “pulling this country back from the brink of bankruptcy ”

        He must have had a laugh (at us all) when he dicided to use that in one of his budget speeches.

        1. Hi, Colin – many thanks for your latest comment which nails down exactly the history of how we come to be in the situation we are: an excellent analysis of the facts.

          I agree – slavery and indentured servitude are effectively one and the same. A cabinet full of millionaires (like Osborne) is a mockery of any purported democracy.

          All the best, RM

          PS correction(s) made.

    1. Hi, Sal. Many thanks for the good wishes. Yes, it went well. Whatever anyone may say of the film, it demands to be seen since it has a quality that will draw people in on many levels and it does lay out the swindle in its entirety. For now, it will be screened in cinemas only via the Cinema on Demand platform which is being rolled out across these isles. People book their places in their town or city and we organise a screening once we have sufficient numbers to make it viable. Anyone who buys 10 tickets, gets one free.

As of January, 2016 comments are open... cheers!