The word ‘Education’ is from the Latin, Educare, the definition of which is,
ORIGIN
late Middle English: from Latin educat- ‘led out’, from the verb educare, related to educere ‘lead out’ (see educe).
Notes
How the Truth has become an Inversion.
Appointment of Sir Hamid Patel as Chairman of OFSTED – Star Academies
Divide and Rule – Mohammedism is a Trojan Horse designed to perpetuate it.
Inversion of public servant – master roles when it comes to those in government
Lindsey Hoyle has grown fat on the public purse.
The best way to control the opposition is to lead it.
Reform party. Nigel Farage is an ex banker.
Chair of Reform Party is Zia Usuf – another Mohammedan
The placement of former bankers in geopolitical roles – Mark Carney, former Governor of BoE, now unelected PM of Canada
Quote from Phenomenal World, p 46
“Consciousness is not located in the brain, but is a ‘plasmic holographic energy field’ that permeates and surrounds the physical body. Is this hologram built of thought waves or thought particles? In a holographic universe the concept of location is an illusion, everything being nonlocal, including consciousness. Although consciousness seems to be localised somewhere inside the skull, it can at times appear to be localised elsewhere, as in the case of out-of-body experiences. The nonlocal aspect of consciousness is also suggested by dreams, where location and space are completely illusory and shifting.”
We are not our biological meat suits, our avatars, these vehicles in which we travel through this construct.
You become that which you suppose yourself to be –
“I am that, I am.”
The most powerful among us are the autodidacts, the free thinkers who have removed the mind shackles of their miseducation and the propaganda that they are immersed in.
Freedom of speech but not freedom of reach – Yaccarino, CEO, X.
How paying for X’s blue tick is like a man who is already in a straitjacket paying to be put in a muffled and silent padded cell (above)
Musk as DOGE, the Sheriff of Venice
The entire episode is, essentially, focused on the subject of Education and it is only by bringing out his spirit from within that the individual will free himself of the shackles of his perceived reality.
Thank you for listening.
Should you be able to support me during this time of my debanking, please consider chucking a few quid into the pot via the BuyMeACoffee button and/or taking out a paid subscription at my Substack page.
What follows is a redacted account of how a False Lender, in this case, the Defendant (D) the Nationwide Building Society, apparently Forged the Claimant’s Affidavit in a hearing at Hull County Court.
Whilst I have written extensively on the various frauds of the banks, with particular regard to the void Deed of Mortgage, which is a fraud on its face, and I have seen many examples of banks committing fraud by using so-called robo-signers to forge people’s signatures, never have I seen a Defendant, in this case a Financial institution, seek to rely on a forged document in an actual Court hearing (other than a mortgage deed, a non-existent loan agreement and false statements of moneys being loaned that is).
At least that was the case until just last week. Regular readers may recall the matter of my friend Dave who turned around a possession claim by making a new application as the Claimant (with the Nationwide [NW] as the Defendant).
He was asking the court to issue a legal declaration that the Mortgage Deed the fake lender relied upon to get a possession order was illegal, along with the purported loan agreement as both demonstrably failed to comply with sections 1 and 2 of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1989 [LPMP Act].
After receiving the Claim, the Defendant (D), the NW, went into full defensive mode. Firstly, a para-legal or solicitor going by the name Vandrewalla entered a false witness statement – as a mere employee at a third party company, he is manifestly not legally qualified to declare or claim, under oath, that any amount is owed on the simple basis he is not a duly appointed officer of the lender.
Indeed, this very fact was established in a case from Northern Ireland, Dermody,
In Dermody the High Court dismissed the claim of the plaintiff bank (Ulster Bank Ireland Limited (“UBIL”)) in circumstances where the person swearing the affidavit setting out the bank’s evidence was an employee of a third party (which was a related company charged with the collection of debts due to UBIL) and had been authorised by UBIL pursuant to a power of attorney to swear the affidavit. This decision is in line with the High Court’s decision in Bank of Scotland plc v Stapleton [2012] IEHC 549 regarding Certus, the servicer charged with the management of the loans due to Bank of Scotland plc.
The cumulative effect of these High Court decisions is that:
• The records of the bank are inadmissible save where the provisions of the Act are complied with.
• The evidence must be provided by an employee of the bank and not a representative of some other company to whom the task of collecting the debt has been outsourced.
• It remains open to the person in the bank who created the original document to give direct evidence.
Source: Ulster Bank Ireland Limited v Dermody, [2014] IEHC 140 and ACC Bank plc v Byrne & Others, Unreported, 31 July 2014, which held that the business records of a bank were inadmissible as evidence of the truth of their contents save where the rigorous provisions of the Act were complied with.
Dave rebutted Vandrewalla’s witness statement in a subsequent Affidavit.
In the meantime, the D appointed a barrister, ‘Dodgy’ Roger Laville, from the Inner Temple who bombarded him with a 134 page bundle of documents, just one hour before the scheduled hearing at Hull County Court.
Mr Laville, a barrister from the Inner Temple, relied upon a forged affidavit in order to sway a court judgement in favour of his client, the Nationwide.
What happened next is astonishing, if not surprising.
An earlier Affidavit (see below) which Dave had entered into the Court in defence of the original possession claim was specifically cited by the presiding judge as being inadmissible on the ground it had not been notarised and witnessed.
When Dave got home, having heard the same judge dismiss his claim, he went through his paperwork and noticed that the Affidavit in question had been forged: some agent of the NW had removed the notary signature and seal from the document in order to make it appear that it had not been witnessed and notarised.
Before taking a look at the offending forgery, let us consider what the definition of forgery is. Bouviers Law Dictionary, on this occasion, provides us with an excellent and suitable definition,
FORGERY, crim. law. Forgery at common law has been held to be
“the fraudulent making and alteration of a writing to the prejudice of another man’s right.” 4 Bl. Com. 247.
By a more modern writer, it is defined, as ” a false making; a making malo animo, of any written instrument, for the purpose of fraud and deceit.” 2 East, P. C. 852.
2. This offence at common law is of the degree of a misdemeanour. 2 Russel, 1437. There are many kinds of forgery, especially subjected to punishment by statutes enacted by the national and state legislatures.
3. The subject will be considered, with reference, .1. To the making or alteration requisite to constitute forgery. 2. The written instruments in respect of which forgery may be committed. 3. The fraud and deceit to the prejudice of another man’s right.
UK ‘Gov’ legislation has this to state,
Forgery and Counterfeiting Act 1981 section 9, check out s.9(2) false if altered 9
Meaning of “false” and “making”.
(1) An instrument is false for the purposes of this Part of this Act—
(a) if it purports to have been made in the form in which it is made by a person who did not in fact make it in that form; or
(b ) if it purports to have been made in the form in which it is made on the authority of a person who did not in fact authorise its making in that form; or
(c) if it purports to have been made in the terms in which it is made by a person who did not in fact make it in those terms; or
(d) if it purports to have been made in the terms in which it is made on the authority of a person who did not in fact authorise its making in those terms.
(2) A person is to be treated for the purposes of this Part of this Act as making a false instrument if he alters an instrument so as to make it false in any respect (whether or not it is false in some other respect apart from that alteration).
“What is the common element in all these cases? It is, I think, best expressed in the definition given by East in his Pleas of the Crown, vol 2, page 822. He treats the subject, I think, better than any writer before or since:
“To forge (a metaphorical expression borrowed from the occupation of the smith) means, properly speaking, no more than to make or form: but in our law it is always taken in an evil sense; and therefore Forgery at common law denotes a false making (which includes every alteration of or addition to a true instrument), a making malo animo, of any written instrument for the purpose of fraud and deceit. This definition results from all the authorities ancient and modern taken together.”
Here are the before and after screenshots of the forged affidavit Mr Laville, the barrister, relied upon in order to falsely allege that Dave’s affidavit had not been notarised when it most demonstrably had.
BEFORE THE FORGERY
AFTER THE FORGERY
For those who understand these matters and for those who don’t, let me express what this means as succinctly as I am able,
On the face of it, and until it may be disproven, the use the manifestly forged affidavit appears to be an act of criminality, committed by the Nationwide BS and/or its agents who have used a forgery, as defined at Law, in order to persuade a District Judge to issue a false judgement in their favour.
Dodgy Roger is not so much in hot water as being gently boiled in a hot tub of mushy peas.
Oh dear, Roger, oh dear.
Please take note that I don’t doubt the influence of the Freemasonic Inner Temple, to which he almost certainly belongs, to be able to cover up for him and pull him out of the hot tub, the truth is that this blatant use of a forged affidavit to gain a pyrrhic victory for the D has to be rather damaging to his, no doubt, highly esteemed ‘reputation’, and, for that reason alone, I would encourage sharing this essay with anyone who may find its contents of interest to them.
Pyrrhic
adjective [attributive] (of a victory) won at too great a cost to have been worthwhile for the victor.
In any event, given my unlawful debanking experience with the Co-op Bank, I will continue to expose the fraud of the financiers as and when it comes to my attention.
In the meantime, and should you be able to support me during this time of my debanking, please consider chucking a few quid into the pot via the BuyMeACoffee button and/or taking out a paid subscription at my Substack page.
Thank you to all my supporters – it’s truly appreciated.
For the purposes of this article, correct thinking is taken to mean that which is right, as opposed to incorrect thinking which is wrong.
“A man’s life of any worth is a continual allegory – and very few eyes can see the mystery.” John Keats
The failure of certain education managers , at large in a Nottingham City college, to apply correct thinking to a humorously inconsequential situation has resulted in a complete collapse of credibility on their part. Alhough having examined the matter, I do seriously wonder how much they had in the first place.
A week ago, I was listening to the mother of a young man (YM) expelled from his post-16 college explain what had happened.
The letter from Robin Atherlay, Assistant Principal of Nottingham College and Head of the City Hub Campus, addressed to YM, states that her son was being excluded for “Engagement with right wing material on social media.”
If we go back a few months, it turns out that the young man (YM) had been photographed by a mate giving a stiff-armed salute like the majority of the German people in this famous image:
August Landmesser, the lone German refusing to raise a stiff right arm amid Hitler’s presence at a 1936 rally, had been a loyal Nazi.
YM’s mate had taken the photograph and, apparently, captioned it ‘Mal Hitler’.
Evidently, the image was posted on the Snap Chat social media platform and someone’s mother saw it and, in what I can only assume was a state of self-righteous woke libtard pique, reported the content to the college. What a noble gesture, how fooking right on, some might opine. Alternatively, others might posit that this is the action of a dreary statist, a grass by any other name and a ridiculous cretin to boot .
You may be of an age like me when one would expect such nonsense to be given short shrift by the school, with a gentle fob off and a quiet word with the lad being the most that would happen. However, those days of schools treating every misdemeanour on its individual merits are long gone, drowned, disembowelled and sacrificed on the altar of political correctness and retarded group think.
It turned out that YM was also on social media as one of a group of mates who go by a piss-take acronym, KKK – not the Ku Klux Klan but the ‘Kidz Klux Krew’ (or something equally inconsequential).
YM was summoned to speak with the useful idiots on the school ‘management’ and suspended pending the outcome of a police investigation. What?! Yes, it turns out that the useful weasels grassed the boy up to the bovine police force, presumably on the same self-serving woke grounds that the mother of another boy had snitched to the school ‘authorities’ in the first instance.
Immediately, the image springs to mind of a coterie of cretins who are masquerading as ‘grown ups’ rather than intelligent pedagogues who have been entrusted to act in the best interests of their students. That statement, incidentally, may remind my long-term readers of the moronic behaviour of the teaching profession (aka the paid brain washers) during the fake scamdemic.
Incredible as it may seem, no-one told YM’s mother that a police investigation was also underway. Mother and son were informed of his expulsion at a meeting and by email. At no point has any report of any investigation been shown to them nor has there been any apparent investigation by the clowns who infest the police HQ. YM and his mum were simply told he was being kicked out because he had engaged in right wing activity on social media. All based on a photograph which some woke woman reported to the college’s hierarchy.
In the long term, this will, I’m confident, turn out to be a blessing in disguise – a pile of fetid woke nonsense shat out by bunch of state lickspittles can be transformed into something golden, of real value to YM. As one door closes another opens.
In the event he has paid sufficient attention to how all this feminised tittle tattle has unfolded at each turn into such a pile of shite, important lessons will have absorbed like how most grown ups are, genuinely, not critical thinkers with minds of their own. Had one of their number been able to display any degree of common sense, then it would have remained a storm in a teacup, instead of becoming a shattered barrel of cuntwaffle, which has and will continue to drown those teachers who should, but don’t, know better.
I well remember that when I was a schoolboy, we would draw swastikas over our exercise books – not as some kind of declaration of allegience to Germany under National Socialism but, largely, because it is a symbol that carries a deep esoteric quality and we liked it.
Contrary to popular misconception, the Swastika is an ancient symbol, found all around the realm.Swastika contained in mosaic pattern of tiles in Silchester house, England.
At my State Indoctrination Centre, Salendine Nook High School, we had a history teacher who we called Hitler on account of his ever-present air of malevolent aggression towards any and all children.
The same moniker was applied to a member of our scout group – his name was Andrew but we actually called him Hitler, on account of him sporting a similar haircut to the Führer. That was his nickname and we thought it hilarious.
In fact, the only time it was ever raised as an issue was when we went on a troop’s summer holiday to Austria and the leader’s wife suggested we refrain from calling him Hitler as it may cause some upset amongst the locals. Of course, we carried on using it and there was never any incident. This was back in the late seventies and a time when young lads went around with penknives in their pockets and sheath knives on their belts. I had a Bowie knife with a horned handle and a Nazi Youth dagger which an uncle had passed onto my dad when he got back from fighting in Europe. In fact, I still have it:
Was any of this behaviour taken by grown ups as proof that we were right wing extremists? Was it fook. I doubt anyone ever thought such a bizarre notion.
We spin round to 2024 and it clear and evident that such behaviours, at least when shown on social media, are now taken as evidence of the bogey man known as Right Wing Extremism.
The education system has been captured and populated with Common Purpose zealots who readily pounce on the superficial, the comedic and the nonsense of it all as material evidence of the bogey man threat referred to in common purpose speak as ‘right wing’.
If we remember that a moron is simply someone who has made a foolish decision based on false information, it is reasonable to state that those who hold positions in the college hierarchy are to be correctly termed morons.
To return to the dagger, could my possession of this Hitler Youth artefact be taken as proof that I am a member of a far right organisation? Any critical thinker would naturally look for further evidence but in clown world, where emotional reactions are held to be valid ways of interpreting data, some may falsely take it as proof that I am a National Socialist sympathiser who has a love of Adolf Hitler.
But rarely is the term ‘Right Wing Extremism’ ever defined. As Iain Davis writes in his excellent article (linked below),
“The UK’s Online Safety Act (OSA) creates the offence of “sending false information intended to cause non-trivial harm.” Quite what “non-trivial harm” is supposed to mean isn’t clear either. The UK Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) certainly doesn’t understand it:
Section 179(1) OSA 2023 creates a summary offence of sending false communications. The offence is committed if [. . .], at the time of sending it, the person intended the message, or the information in it, to cause non-trivial psychological or physical harm to a likely audience. [. . .] Non-trivial psychological or physical harm is not defined [. . .]. Prosecutors should be clear when making a charging decision about what the evidence is concerning the suspect’s intention and how what was intended was not “trivial”, and why. Note that there is no requirement that such harm should in fact be caused, only that it be intended.” https://iaindavis.com/the-myth-of-online-radicalisation/
The discredited Marianna Spring, a blatant state-sponsored propagandist and in-correct thinker, apparently wrote this in January, 2024,
“titled “Young Britons exposed to online radicalisation following Hamas attack,” Marianna Spring wrote:
It is a spike in hate that leaves young Britons increasingly exposed to radicalisation by algorithm. [. . .] Algorithms are recommendation systems that promote new content to a user based on posts they engage with. That means they can drive some people to more extreme ideas.” Ibid.
Intuitively, I know that this young man is better off out of such a toxic gossip-riddled environment where the cuntwaffle like Spring spouts is the glue that holds together the delusions of adequacy that these fake pedagogues claim. And, to state it plainly, it is almost exclusively the over-reaching female dogma that infects the entire of the education system that is behind this. All of which means that young British boys from impoverished backgrounds are utterly disaffected by the feminisation of the education system to the point where their academic performance has been declining over the last few decades:
The entire system needs dismantling and putting back in the hands of genuine educationalists who teach their charges how to think, not what to think, which, of course, is the current system of mass indoctrination and mind control that exists to the detriment of so many bright boys, no matter what their background.
The art of life is that the individual uses the tough times and experiences that life presents us with to strengthen his character – to turn base metal into gold. How does he do that? By learning how to think for himself. If bad, or incorrect thinking has created this shit-parade, then only right, or correct thinking can get him (and us) out of it.
An Encounter with Mr Butlin, an agent of ‘Marston Recovery’.
Fraud Alert: this Rogue Cast features an attempt by a Marston Group Bailiff (debt collector) to levy a false fine using a fake Warrant of Control.
Before I go any further, let’s remind ourselves of what the constitutional law of these lands says about the subject of today’s RogueCast:
Bill of Rights 1689: Grants of Forfeitures.
“That all Grants and Promises of Fines and Forfeitures of particular persons before Conviction are illegal and void”
Could it be plainer? “Before conviction” means that no fine or forfeit can be imposed until and unless the individual is convicted in a court of law.
For those with the eyes to see and ears to hear, that means any and all ‘fines’ issued by so-called authorities, like those of the (mis) Education departments, the Councils and the Police are null and void for want of due process – only a court of law can issue fines and penalties and that is only after the matter has been heard by a jury. The logical conclusion of which is that any and all such ‘fines’ are fraudulent and that any person seeking to rely upon them to extort moneys is acting in breach of the Fraud Act (2006) – see footnote for details.
By attempting to rely upon a false warrant, it could be reasonably be argued that any bailiff or debt collector is committing
2 Fraud by false representation
(1) A person is in breach of this section if he—
(a) dishonestly makes a false representation, and
(b) intends, by making the representation—
(i) to make a gain for himself or another, or
(ii) to cause loss to another or to expose another to a risk of loss.
(2) A representation is false if—
(a) it is untrue or misleading, and
(b) the person making it knows that it is, or might be, untrue or misleading.
(3) “Representation” means any representation as to fact or law, including a representation as to the state of mind of—
(a) the person making the representation, or
(b) any other person.
(4) A representation may be express or implied.
(5) For the purposes of this section a representation may be regarded as made if it (or anything implying it) is submitted in any form to any system or device designed to receive, convey or respond to communications (with or without human intervention)
The first thing I’d like to note about this encounter with Mr Butlin from Marston Recovery is that it didn’t get off to a good start. Bailiff ‘Barry’ aka Paul, turned up acting like the proverbial ‘Barry big bollocks’ – there had been no acceptance (receipt) of any paperwork in relation to the matter, including a legally-required Notice of Visit but that did not stop him knocking on the door and letting himself in to my home.
He was told, in no uncertain terms that he was trespassing and duly removed himself. He then objected to me filming him – a fallacious assertion that is dealt with in the conversation. As the dialogue unfolded, I have to say that on a personable level, I liked the bloke, notwithstanding his criminal attempt to enforce a non-existent warrant and having no Deed of Assignment (of the alleged debt).
Notice how at every point I conditionally offered to pay him, upon him providing the correct paperwork.
Note too the pertinent issue that nothing had been received (accepted) on the simple basis that any unsolicited post is invariably returned to sender. Contrary to what Mr B asserts, returned, or, indeed even mail that has been binned, has not been received. In other words, delivery is NOT acceptance in the same way an unwanted gift may be delivered, but politely declined.
As it turned out, the matter arose in Devon. However, it is all null and void as no Penalty Charge Notice (PCN) was issued and therefore nothing was served. As stated in the exchange, zero correspondence has been received. Whilst some people would simply stick the correspondence in the bin, my personal preference is ‘Return to Sender – no contract’.
As I say to him,
“I kind of like your chutzpah, but I think you are on the wrong side.”
However, that does not absolve him from the fraudulent misrepresentation he is attempting to use to extort moneys. That is criminal, whichever way you want to coat it.
I also take the opportunity to bring up the issue of the illegal immigrants who are being used by the private High Court Enforcement Office companies to steal people’s homes, which is another invidious aspect of the Great British Mortgage Swindle (TGBMS).
It is also worth noting that a Magistrate’s court order is required for any agency to fit a clamp to your wheel, and that includes DVLA. If the debt collector refuses to remove the clamp, then you have every right to remove it as appropriate. Without that, the highway robber is acting illegally, which is the case 99.9% of these situations.
In the end, the clamp was removed, Paul and I shook hands and, that very afternoon, a Notice of Fraud was sent via Recorded Delivery to the CEO of the Marston Group along with an administrative charge of £1,200.
Is Mr Butlin a good man, like he asserts he is or is he guilty of committing fraud by misrepresentation? I’ve stated my case against him but would be interested to hear what the viewers think.
In conclusion, let us turn to a trio of maxims that neatly summarise the episode:
He who leaves the field of battle first (does not respond appropriately to an Affidavit) loses by default. See Book of Job; Matt 10:22. Legal maxim: He who does not repel a wrong when he can occasions it.
Contra veritatem lex numquam aliquid permittit. The law never suffers anything contrary to truth. 2 Co. Inst. 252.
Fraus est celare fraudem. It is a fraud to conceal a fraud. 1 Vern. 270.
As ever, thank you for watching. Should you appreciate the work at RM, then you may wish to buy me a coffee, or even several. Many thanks to Jerry and Lizzie for the coffees.
Footnote:
the Fraud Act (2006):
1. Fraud
(1)A person is guilty of fraud if he is in breach of any of the sections listed in subsection (2) (which provide for different ways of committing the offence).
(2) The sections are—
(a) section 2 (fraud by false representation),
(b) section 3 (fraud by failing to disclose information), and
(c) section 4 (fraud by abuse of position).
(3) A person who is guilty of fraud is liable—
(a) on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding [F1the general limit in a magistrates’ court] or to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum (or to both);
(b) on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years or to a fine (or to both).
2. Debt Collectors Script– updated on 25/06/24 to include case law on how a warrant is only valid when signed by the judge who issued the order. My thanks to Ashley Craven for this which includes also the numerous statutory instruments in support of the points made in the video.
In May, 2019, Michael O’Bernicia and yours truly were interviewed by Ross Ashcroft at the Renegade Inc Studio in London. The show was broadcast on its terrestrial tv channel on Russia Today.
After 9 years of full-on engagement in the Great British Mortgage Swindle, Michael and I had produced the film and had taken it to Cannes Flm Market in 2015.
When we were invited on to the show it seemed as though things were about to take off in a spectacular fashion. Ross had already produced his own acclaimed film on the criminal nature of high finance, The Four Horsemen and thus was knowledgeable about the subject matter. His enthusiasm was evident when he greeted us at the film studio and immediately congratulated us on the documentary.
For us to get on a relatively mainstream channel was taken as a huge boon to us getting the film out to a potentially massive audience. Even my 81 year old mother had watched the first broadcast on the television – “but why did you wear that bloody leather jacket, Michael?”
The interview was well-received and we organised a class action against the licenced lenders for all those duped mortgagors across these shores.
The pressure on the CEOs and the Chief Registrar was immense – they were being hit from all angles, and in true guerilla style, the fraudsters did not know where the next blow was coming from.
We had dedicated team, the Banksterbusters, operating in all areas of Britain and Ireland.
And then what happened? The Covid Psy-Op was unleased in March, 2020 and one of the most egegrious Mind Control programme was unleashed on a people who, for the most part, were lacking the necessary critical thinking skills to see through the deception.
It was no surprise when the Gov and fake lenders announced a mortgage moratorium (still in place) .
Whilst I wouldn’t be so bold as to suggest the Divoc 91 operation was rolled out due to the clear threat posed by TGBMS to the interests of the usual suspects, it certainly is the case that its roll-out had the effect of smoke-screening the potential of TGBMS to reach a massive audience and bring about freedom from the Death Grip aka a mortgage.
The TGBMS DVD already had dozens of glowing 5 star reviews on Amazon.co.uk, one of which is quoted below:
“The two director’s (Michael O’Bernicia and Michael O’Deira) are the real deal. They both have been, and are continuing, to stand up against the fraudulent scam and racket that is the financial system.
For those who do not already know, one of the world’s greatest economic and banking experts, Professor Richard Werner has already conclusively and forensically proved that commercial banks do NOT loan money. In fact they are not legally allowed to loan money (Youtube: ‘Remarkable Proof That Mortgages & Loans Do Not Exist – Prof. Richard Werner’ for more).
This film is an important for many reasons. One of those reasons is the energy of truth that it releases to the masses.
It isn’t a theory that over 11 million UK mortgages are fraudulent. It isn’t a theory that mortgagors weren’t loaned anything. It isn’t a theory that all mortgages are in-fact an ‘exchange’ and not a loan. It isn’t theory that all mortgagors are paying vast interest payments on loans that do not exist.
It isn’t a theory that solicitors are giving 100% illegal advice and getting people to sign mortgage deeds and granting an interest in property that they did not, or do not yet own.
This is illegal and therefore the mortgage charge that Land Registry registers is in-fact an illegal and void mortgage charge that must be cancelled. This is where people must start using a Land Registry form AP-1 to get these illegal mortgages cancelled immediately.
Also, the great thing is that there are now legal precedents and judgments that obligate the Chief Registrar at the Land Registry to indemnify all financial losses the mortgagor incurred, due to the fraudulent mortgage. I.e. ALL mortgage related payments are due back to you, and to repeat, the Chief Registrar is legally obligated to indemnify the mortgagor.
Interestingly, by law the Chief Registrar can then claim those monies back off the conveyancing solicitor that gave illegal advice in the first place. Oh the fun…!
Mortgagors do NOT have the right to grant an interest in property they do not yet own, and the conveyancing solicitors got you to grant an interest in property you do not yet own.
The solicitors advised you to carry out an illegal act! The binding authority of Scott v Southern Pacific Mortgages and others [2014] UKSC 52, established the irrefutable fact that: a mortgagor has no rights to grant before the completion of the sale and purchase of the property concerned; hence the instruction that the deed must bear the same date as the transfer of credit to the mortgagor, in order to give the false impression that section 1(3) of the 1989 Act has been complied with.
In said case, Lady Hale stated this point most plainly:“The purchaser was not in a position either at the date of exchange of contracts or at any time up until completion of the purchase to confer equitable proprietary,” and,“This case has been decided on the simple basis that the purchaser of land cannot create a proprietary interest in the land, which is capable of being an overriding interest, until his contract has been completed,”
Buy this film even if you know most of the information or not. It’s £10.00 ffs! Peanuts! It has taken a decade of emotional, psychological, and huge financial pain to the makers of this film and many others. Just by purchasing this film you are adding to the energy that is building. The time is coming. In fact the time is now!
Well done guys…awesome job!By the way, type ‘Cancel UK Mortgages via Land Registry – Michael Bernicia Nov 15 2018’ into YouTube. Also google ‘roguemale.org’ and read Michael O’Deira’s blog, and ‘thebernician.net’ for Michael O’Bernicia’s blog. Click ‘Banking Crimes’ link and get ready for your jaw to drop!
5 stars easy. I would have given 6 if I could!”
In any event, each and every CEO of every UK licenced fake lender is now in debt to the tune of billions for their part in the fraud, as they each have equitable common law liens against theirs and the ‘bank’s properties. Each of which is capable of being registered as a charge at the Land Registry.
The conclusion that should be taken is this – we do not give up.
Preposterous: the brass neck of an imposter in Derry, a judicial cover-up and a rigged election.
pre·pos·ter·ous| prəˈpäst(ə)rəs | adjective contrary to reason or common sense; utterly absurd or ridiculous: a preposterous suggestion.
ORIGIN mid 16th century: from Latin praeposterus ‘reversed, absurd’(from prae ‘before’ + posterus ‘coming after’) + -ous.
The preposterous mayoral appointment (not election) of a Native Kenyan woman who has been in Northern Ireland for only 3-4 years is as marvellous example of the clown world as it gets.
In her recent diatribe against the native people of Ireland, whom she falsely claims to represent, she opines the official narrative of the globalist hegemony that is behind the mass-immigration of hordes of men into the islands of Britain. She literally repeats the propaganda that diversity is strength, that re-population is necessary due to declining birthrates and that, ultimately, the indigenous population is too white, too racist and, in this case, too right wing. And what exactly makes them ‘right wing’? Could it simply be the fact that they’ve also had a gutfull of this political correctness – and are, rightly, concerned that foreigners are being elected on account of their skin tone only and never appointed on merit?
It is to be noted that rarely, if ever, is any of this nonsense defined – for instance, what on earth is racism? How can it be measured? Does it actually exist?
A hop, skip and jump away in bonnie Scotland, the ridiculous puppet Hamza ‘Useless’ Yusuf has resigned (or been pushed) as the leader of the Scottish Nationalist Party. Given his speech about how Scotland is ‘too white’, one can scarcely conceive how he could have any claim to be a Scottish Nationalist.
Just like the false Mayor of Derry, this barely-functional fookwit is an arrogant outsider with delusions of adequacy.
We live in a Soros wet dream, where political correctness and satanic nihilism exist behind the life jackets and the movement of pawns around the international chessboard. In essence, it is not unlike a game of Risk.
And speaking of placed Mayors, the traitor Sadiq Khan has been positioned for a fourth term as Mayor of London after rigged election.
It’s all doomed to failure, being built on the mother of lies
Meanwhile, the Post Office scandal gets murkier and murkier as Judge and Council for the PO agreed to cover up evidence of the accused’s innocence as it was not in the public interest and to falsely grant the PO “Public interest immunity” – which is as fine an example of the the snake-tongued legalese deception as you can get.
I have long-stated that ‘legal’ professionals are simply whores who lie for a living and this assertion is vigorously supported by the interrogation of PO lawyer, Jarnail Singh, who lies about an email he claims not to have seen when the fact is he saved it to file and printed it off, according to his own computer records.
Any and all of these preposterous actors stand and fall in accordance with the machinations of their globalist puppet masters. As such, we should not be surprised when these empty marionettes appear, metaphorically, to have noses that lengthen in direct relation to their lies and the ears of donkeys that sprout from their foolish actions.
Many thanks for listening and particularly to Dave Shaman and David R for their kind support of the work at Rogue Male.
If you’d like to show you appreciation of my work, then please click on the Buy Me a Coffee button.
Is the current judicial system dead? In this RogueCast from Rock Cemetery, Nottingham, I posit that it is and that we are witnessing the death of ‘UK’ Justice.
It is well-known that the UK courts operate through the incorporated dead ‘persons’, the incorporatedALL-CAPITALS NAME and that this is your ‘legal fiction’.
It is, therefore, most appropriate that this subject is ruminated upon on a site given over, at least ostensibly, to the dead, whose names are chiselled into the masonry of the tombstones.
it is You, namely, the individual soul that is inside the biological meat-suit (that the false religion of Statism deceptively and incessantly programmes you to believe is the real you), that is the antidote to all the tyranny and madness that is afoot right now.
Don’t swallow the collective scripts, get out there, take action, engage your pen as your sword and make your non-consent loud and clear. Far from making you a target, taking action backed by the truth will empower you.
There is truly nothing to fear other than fear itself. As an immortal being, nothing can harm you.
Realise you are in the fight of your life and a battle against the Globalists who would enslave you and your progeny, as declared by the head-puppet of the WEF, Klaus Schwab.
Know that the only way to counteract the lies and deceptions is to speak the truth and refuse to back down.
If you are in Court, don’t hold back – if the original mortgage deed cannot be provided then there is no claim against you. Arm yourself with the Lien’s factual discoveries – no evidence of a loan, no valid contract, the deed is a fraud on its face, only an officer of the bank can provide a witness statement testifying to any loan or debt being existent, rendering the legal representations of the likes of TLT and Ascent an outright lie and threaten the paraglegals who signed it with perjury (which is exactly what they are engaging in).
Our legal system is supposed to be founded upon logic, reason and a fair trial. However, every day, every court is issuing orders that are founded in the opposite – illogical decisions abound, judges rely on fallacy and fair hearings are rare.
In MacFoy v United Africa Company Limited [1961] 3 All ER 1169 page 5 of the judgment, Denning LJ famously expressed the difference between a void and voidable order:
This is the same as saying that it was void and not merely voidable. The distinction between the two has been repeatedly drawn. If an act is void, then it is in law a nullity. It is not only bad, but incurably bad.
There is no need for an order of the court to set it aside. It is automatically null and void without more ado, though it is sometimes convenient to have the court declare it to be so. And every proceeding which is founded on it is also bad and incurably bad. You cannot put something on nothing and expect it to stay there. It will collapse.”
In this Rogue Cast I once again document the latest example of a void order in the matter of Nat West vs Steve – please visit this link for a background to the case.
Thank you for your support. Should you wish to show your appreciation for the work at Rogue Male, then please Buy me a coffee and leave a comment.
All the very best and a big thank you to David R for his sponsorship of the site.
TAKING IT BACK – A SUCCESSFUL COMMON LAW RESTITUTION OF A STOLEN HOME BY THE PEOPLE.
Location: Spondon, Derbyshire.
On Friday, 22nd March, 2024 – notice the date: 3/22 – a gang of men masquerading as Derbyshire Police Force aided and abetted the criminally fraudulent theft of a private home in Spondon, Derbyshire by another gang masquerading as High Court Enforcement Officers who used a ramshackle collection of unidentified Pakistani and African men to carry out an unlawful eviction.
An ex-Para, recently identified as Simon Carter, acting as a High Court Enforcement Officer, aided and abetted by a gang of foreign dupes and Derbyshire Police Force on 22/03/24.
The fraudulent issuance of a High Court Writ was the pretext for the eviction. This one was supposedly issued by way of an application by a private company going by the name of High Court Enforcement Services Ltd.
This restitution took place in broad daylight on Easter Sunday, 2024 and in this special RogueCast, I document the successful operation, carried out by a determined body of volunteers from all over the country.
It is to be noted that the circumstances of the theft, which was aided and abetted by Derbyshire Police Force, who took the side of the bailiffs and the immigrant security guards, in a manifest dereliction of their oaths as constables, all point to a massive fraud. This fraud is documented in the Great British Mortgage Swindle, which can be viewed for free here.
Thank you for your support. Should you wish to show your appreciation for the work at Rogue Male, then please Buy me a coffee and leave a comment.
All the very best and a big thank you to David R for his support of the site.
A Rogue Cast in which I ramble, once again, over the state of the British Justice system.
Last week, a female Judge, Amanda Rippon, manifestly perverted the course of justice in Newcastle when she evidently a void order formulated by a mind that is clouded in political correctness and woke nonce-sense – in which an immigrant paedophile effectively got off with the sexual abuse of a 12 year old.
The Sam Melia miscarriage of justice is yet another blatant example of the ongoing perversion of the Law of these Lands. It was heard by a jury but the entire proceedings were rigged by a woke legal system which, it is alleged, meant the judge had no choice but to issue a sentence of at least 2 years in line with the bogus legalisation.
I actually sat on a jury some 20 years ago in which it was clear the police were attempting to pervert the course of justice by fitting up a man from Newark. The jury agreed and the case was thrown out.
I mention this as people need to be reminded of the power that lies in the jury system, which is the bedrock of justice across all common law lands. The Grand Jury system in the UK was abolished in 1933 and more about how the act abolishing it and its reinstatement in 2014 can be read about it at the following links:
Such perversions of justice are a daily occurrence in the courts of these lands.
However, Grand Juries are back… and there’s fook all that can change that.
Whichever way one approaches it, the judiciary of these lands is a captured operation, people by a coterie of woke judges who deem any expression of truth to be inadmissible and whose personal agendas disable the judges’ ability to discern the facts and act accordingly to ensure justice is done.
Whether it be in a bogus magistrates court, a family court, a Crown Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court or Parliament, each and every one is a captured operation, run for the benefit of the controllers and to the blatant detriment of the indigenous peoples.
Interestingly, a County Court asked to provide venue for Grand Jury of the people and why not? After all, who paid for the buildings used as defacto courts? Who actually built them? If the Crown is claiming ownership, then that claim can be easily discounted due to its well-established illegitimacy and nefarious activities.
There comes a time when the lone wolf has to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with the pack as and when all the wolves are facing an existential threat.
I also mention the amount of mispent energy that is directed into and consumed by football . Wilhelm Reich stated that,
If the psychic energies of the average mass of people watching a football game or a musical comedy could be diverted into the rational channels of a freedom movement, they would be invincible.”
He is correct, of course. The all-encompassing media coverage of football is an age old game of Beer and Circuses, one in which the divide and rule strategy is deployed into the misdirection of hearts, minds and souls into empty allegiances and false personal squabbles with men from other towns and cities who are not their real foes, when, all the while, the real enemy is in international Jewish financial control and the various captured agencies of false government.
I also consider the importance of being mindful oabout who we listen and give our energies to.
Thanks for listening and, as ever, my heartfelt gratitude goes out to David R for his invaluable support of the work at this site.
Into the Void – how the British Courts are a captured operation.
In this latest Rogue Ramble, I consider the state of the British Judiciary in the light of the recent High Court perverse pronouncement that Richard D Hall will not be allowed to adduce into the evidence his considerable body of facts surrounding the Manchester Arena event of 2017. As well as producing a series of films concerning the various anomalies of the official narrative, he has written a book on the matter which is some 400+ pages in length on the event.
Unfortunately, the perversity of the High Court decision is one which permeates throughout the British Judicial system whereby single judges are given the status of judge, jury and executioner. The Great British Mortgage Swindle is another case in point and I also consider how a single judge at Nottingham County Court has issued a void order for possession of my good friend Steve’s home, scheduled for Tuesday, 20th February, 2024. Whilst Steve will make an application to have this void order set aside, one cannot trust the County Court to do what is lawful and so we will be prepared for any attempt at plundering him of his home.
If you are of the view that the Post Office scandal is a deplorable state of affairs, I would urge you to consider the Great British Mortgage Swindle, a thousand year fraud that continues to this day and affects some 11 million so-called mortgagors.
There are many lickspittles out there who will support their dark overlords and spout BS about how it is nonsense but they are cowards who know not their elbows from their arses and have not delved into the facts of the matter, as detailed in the mind-blowing documentary, TGBMS. These facts are easily proven, namely,
There is no evidence to suggest that the licenced lender has not sold on (securitised) the mortgage and is no longer the Holder in Due Course of the charging instrument, aka the Deed of Mortgage
There is no evidence of a loan
There is no lawful agreement (contract) Without any and all of these items, a possession claim is fraudulent.
In short and as many readers and viewers will appreciate, we are living in a world of lies in which the truth has been inverted and perverted by a coterie of satanic Jewish financial fraudsters and parasites commonly known as the House of Rothschild who are supported by privately educated lickspittles who populate the courts and the numerous firms of solicitors who lie and commit perjury each and every time they initiate possession proceedings for and on behalf of their dark overlords.
Further reading:
4 Part series on how the World Bank falsely claims ownership of your deed of mortgage:
Part 1 https://roguemale.org/2023/11/20/your-deed-of-mortgage-is-in-a-world-bank-foreign-vault/
Part 2 https://roguemale.org/2023/11/24/british-courts-under-foreign-control-pt-2/
Part 3 https://roguemale.org/2023/11/27/no-deed-no-possession-claim-pt-3/
Part 4 https://roguemale.org/2023/11/29/globalism-the-remedy-is-you-part-4/
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
