Episode 33: TAKING IT BACK

TAKING IT BACK – A SUCCESSFUL COMMON LAW RESTITUTION OF A STOLEN HOME BY THE PEOPLE.

Location: Spondon, Derbyshire.

On Friday, 22nd March, 2024 – notice the date: 3/22 – a gang of men masquerading as Derbyshire Police Force aided and abetted the criminally fraudulent theft of a private home in Spondon, Derbyshire by another gang masquerading as High Court Enforcement Officers who used a ramshackle collection of unidentified Pakistani and African men to carry out an unlawful eviction.

An ex-Para, recently identified as Simon Carter, acting as a High Court Enforcement Officer, aided and abetted by a gang of foreign dupes and Derbyshire Police Force on 22/03/24.

The fraudulent issuance of a High Court Writ was the pretext for the eviction. This one was supposedly issued by way of an application by a private company going by the name of High Court Enforcement Services Ltd.

Given the fact that the home was stolen by way of fraud (the deed of mortgage is illegal, there was no loan, no legal contract and the alleged claimant, Nationwide Building Society, not being the holder of the mortgage note, has no legal standing to issue possession proceedings), the people who were evicted had every right to take it back as a common law act of restitution.

This restitution took place in broad daylight on Easter Sunday, 2024 and in this special RogueCast, I document the successful operation, carried out by a determined body of volunteers from all over the country.

It is to be noted that the circumstances of the theft, which was aided and abetted by Derbyshire Police Force, who took the side of the bailiffs and the immigrant security guards, in a manifest dereliction of their oaths as constables, all point to a massive fraud. This fraud is documented in the Great British Mortgage Swindle, which can be viewed for free here.

Thank you for your support. Should you wish to show your appreciation for the work at Rogue Male, then please Buy me a coffee and leave a comment.

All the very best and a big thank you to David R for his support of the site.

April 1, 2024 3

Episode 32 – The Perversion of Justice

UK Courts Unfit for Purpose.

A Rogue Cast in which I ramble, once again, over the state of the British Justice system.

Last week, a female Judge, Amanda Rippon, manifestly perverted the course of justice in Newcastle when she evidently a void order formulated by a mind that is clouded in political correctness and woke nonce-sense – in which an immigrant paedophile effectively got off with the sexual abuse of a 12 year old.

The Sam Melia miscarriage of justice is yet another blatant example of the ongoing perversion of the Law of these Lands. It was heard by a jury but the entire proceedings were rigged by a woke legal system which, it is alleged, meant the judge had no choice but to issue a sentence of at least 2 years in line with the bogus legalisation.

I actually sat on a jury some 20 years ago in which it was clear the police were attempting to pervert the course of justice by fitting up a man from Newark. The jury agreed and the case was thrown out.

I mention this as people need to be reminded of the power that lies in the jury system, which is the bedrock of justice across all common law lands. The Grand Jury system in the UK was abolished in 1933 and more about how the act abolishing it and its reinstatement in 2014 can be read about it at the following links:

https://roguemale.org/2014/10/23/grand-juries-back-change-things/

https://roguemale.org/2014/11/29/grand-jury-whose-authority/

https://roguemale.org/2014/10/13/first-grand-jury-81-years-sits-british-isles/

https://roguemale.org/2015/08/11/nottingham-epoch-defining-events/

Such perversions of justice are a daily occurrence in the courts of these lands.

However, Grand Juries are back… and there’s fook all that can change that.

Whichever way one approaches it, the judiciary of these lands is a captured operation, people by a coterie of woke judges who deem any expression of truth to be inadmissible and whose personal agendas disable the judges’ ability to discern the facts and act accordingly to ensure justice is done.

Whether it be in a bogus magistrates court, a family court, a Crown Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court or Parliament, each and every one is a captured operation, run for the benefit of the controllers and to the blatant detriment of the indigenous peoples.

Interestingly, a County Court asked to provide venue for Grand Jury of the people and why not? After all, who paid for the buildings used as defacto courts? Who actually built them? If the Crown is claiming ownership, then that claim can be easily discounted due to its well-established illegitimacy and nefarious activities.

There comes a time when the lone wolf has to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with the pack as and when all the wolves are facing an existential threat.

I also mention the amount of mispent energy that is directed into and consumed by football . Wilhelm Reich stated that,

If the psychic energies of the average mass of people watching a football game or a musical comedy could be diverted into the rational channels of a freedom movement, they would be invincible.”

He is correct, of course. The all-encompassing media coverage of football is an age old game of Beer and Circuses, one in which the divide and rule strategy is deployed into the misdirection of hearts, minds and souls into empty allegiances and false personal squabbles with men from other towns and cities who are not their real foes, when, all the while, the real enemy is in international Jewish financial control and the various captured agencies of false government.

I also consider the importance of being mindful oabout who we listen and give our energies to.

Thanks for listening and, as ever, my heartfelt gratitude goes out to David R for his invaluable support of the work at this site.

Further links:

Universal Community Trust

March 6, 2024 1

Episode 31: A No-Show as Bailiffs Fail to Turn Up

A No-Show

Bailiffs Fail to Turn Up

In this brief Rogue Cast, I ramble along the disused Nottingham Canal and provide an update on the attempt by Nottingham County Court and its paid henchmen – the bailiffs – to plunder a man’s home on the back of a fraudulent possession claim and subsequently void order issued by a man purporting to act as a District Judge.

Whilst foreign immigrants get preferential treatment, the genocide of eviction, as perpetrated on the idigenous peoples of the isles of Britain via the Great British Mortgage Swindle continues.

The application was made under CPR 3.1 (7) on the ground that the DJ mistakenly formulated an order that was in contradiction of the facts before him.

It was served via email on all parties and by Special Delivery to Nottingham County Court.

This is a santised version of the application to have the void order set aside:

Served by email.

NAME OF CEO, NAME OF BANK (CLAIMANT) [email address]

NAME OF SOLICITORS [email address]

cc: MANAGER NAME COUNTY COURT

In the [NAME] County Court

________________________________________________________________

NAME OF BANK, CLAIMANT (C)

NAME OF DEFENDANT (D)

CLAIM NO. [XXXXXX]

_____________________________________________________________________

Affidavit in Support of Application to Set Aside Void Order

Under CPR 3.1(7)

NAME OF AFFIANT

DATE 2024

__________________________________________________________________

To All parties

I, Name of Defendant, of [ADDRESS], having first hand knowledge of the facts, make this Affidavit of Truth and say as follows,

Pursuant to the Order of NAME OF JUDGE AND DATE and facts of the matter you are hereby served this Affidavit in support of my application to set aside the enclosed possession order of [DATE].
It was established by the Court of Appeal in Tibbles v SIG Plc [2012] 1 WLR 2591 that exercise of discretion to set aside or vary an order under CPR 3.1(7) will be exercised in these circumstances:
(i) where there had been a material change of circumstances since the order was made; (ii) where the facts on which the original decision was made had been misstated; or (iii) where there had been a manifest mistake on the part of the judge in formulating the order.
In the case of the possession order of DATE 2024, it is my contention that (ii) and (iii) are both applicable grounds for setting aside the order.

(ii) Misstatement of Facts.

The first ground for setting aside the order is that the facts on which the original decision was made were (innocently or otherwise) misstated, namely that,
It is beyond doubt that the Claimant does not have the fraudulently conveyed Deed of Mortgage (the mortgage note) and has, despite repeated request, failed to prove it has the locus standi to initiate an application for possession and is not committing a fraud upon the Court and the Defendant (D). This has lead to a manifest mistake on the part of the judge in his formulation of the order on the basis that the Court has been informed of the fact and DDJ NAME mistakenly stated that electronic copies were deemed acceptable when I have alleged that the originating Deed of Mortgage was fraudulently conveyed.
Indeed, as I have repeatedly pointed out to all parties, the Claimant’s reliance upon photocopies of the fraudulently conveyed Deed of Mortgage, its false claim that there exists a valid agreement/contract as per sections 1 and 2 of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 and that it loaned me moneys is a conscious and pre-meditated act of dishonesty, as considered by the standards of the ordinary, honest informed lay observer.
NAME OF County Court is bound to give effect to this application to set aside the order for possession, by way of the ruling given in the High Court case, Bank of Scotland plc v Waugh & Others [2014] – a mortgage will be void under s52(1) of the Law of Property Act 1925, if it fails to comply with s1(3) of the 1989 Act; and,
The Court is also directed to the binding authority of Scott v Southern Pacific Mortgages & Others [2014] UKSC 52 – a mortgagor has no rights to grant before the completion of the sale and purchase of the property concerned; hence the instruction that the deed must bear the same date as the transfer of credit to the mortgagor, in order to give the false impression that section 1(3) of the 1989 Act has been complied with.
In said case, Lady Hale stated this point most plainly: “The purchaser was not in a position either at the date of exchange of contracts or at any time up until completion of the purchase to confer equitable proprietary,” and,“This case has been decided on the simple basis that the purchaser of land cannot create a proprietary interest in the land, which is capable of being an overriding interest, until his contract has been completed.”
Wherefore, the Witness Statements of NAME OF SOLICITOR, the C’s legal representative are dishonest on the ground that s/he has been informed of the facts of the matter and, in any event, has no standing to make any claim that there is a debt as s/he is not an officer of the purported lender, the Claimant. In support of which, see: Ulster Bank Ireland Limited v Dermody, [2014] IEHC 140 andACC Bank plc v Byrne & Others, Unreported, 31 July 2014, which held that the business records of a bank were inadmissible as evidence of the truth of their contents save where the rigorous provisions of the Act were complied with.
Having been informed of the facts, the Witness Statement(s) of NAME, made for and on behalf of the Claimant, demonstrate her conduct to be dishonest by the standards of ordinary decent people.
In the Takhar v Gracefield judgment each of the Lord and Lady Justices approved the statement of principle by Aikens LJ in Royal Bank of Scotland plc v Highland Financial Partners LP [2013] EWCA Civ 328 at paragraph 106 ( see per Lord Kerr at paragraph 57 and Lord Sumption at 67). Lord Briggs and Lady Arden, who gave separate judgments, appear to have also agreed with this statement of principle: see at paragraphs 76 and 104 respectively.
What Aikens LJ said was: “The principles are, briefly: first, there has to be a ‘conscious and deliberate dishonesty’ in relation to the relevant evidence given, or action taken, statement made or matter concealed, which is relevant to the judgment now sought to be impugned. Secondly, the relevant evidence, action, statement or concealment (performed with conscious and deliberate dishonesty) must be ‘material’.”
The deliberate dishonesty goes right back to the inception of the purported mortgage when I was induced into signing a Deed of Mortgage over a property that I was not the owner of at the time of the conveyance. This, of course, may be rightly labelled an industrial scale fraud as it is the common practice relied upon by each and every alleged lender. The Claimant (NAME OF BANK in this case) – whose role was one of intermediate broker and administrator (who will never have a direct interest in the lending) – has been unwittingly authorised by the FCA to lend to a borrower but what it is doing is providing unsecured credit (deemed as a loan) to the purchaser for its fees to purchase the legal and equitable title of the secured obligations of the borrower. The secured obligations are therefore transferred for free directly to the purchaser, not sold.
My Affidavits of [DATES] establish that the Claimant and its legal representatives were made aware of the dishonesty of NAME’s Witness Statements and that each Judge had it brought to his attention and has mistakenly overlooked it. NAME knew what she was doing was dishonest by virtue of the fact she was made aware of the facts of the matter prior to the ‘hearings’. These facts were established by the Affidavit of Obligation, which NAME had knowledge of before she dishonestly made her witness statement and can be viewed in the court file.

(iii) The manifest mistake on the part of the judge in formulating the order.

This now brings us onto the subject of the mistakes of the Judge who issued the order for possession and of DDJ NAME who presided at the hearing on 17th November, 2023. It is my assertion that there has been no fair hearing on the ground that I could not hear anything: my hearing disability has prevented me from taking part in any of the purported hearings. By ignoring the fact of my deafness, there has been a manifest mistake on the part of the judge in formulating the possession order.
The order for possession is null and void on the simple basis that no meaningful hearing has actually taken place.
I have complied with the Court’s request that I provide material evidence of my deafness and, indeed, at the last hearing I attended on17th November, 2023, I was unable to hear virtually anything. In good faith, it is asserted that no hearing can take place if one party cannot hear. After all, how could I consent to an order that I manifestly have not heard and thus been unable to refute?
It was on this basis that I made an application to have Judge NAME’s order of 08 December, 2023 set aside. His assertion that the moving of the desk closer to his enabled me to hear was wholly rejected, as was his comment that I was in some way faking my hearing loss. The consequence of my hearing disability is that I heard virtually nothing of what was said and at no point was I able to take part in the Judge’s pronouncements on my application. From the little I could gleam of it, Mr Tate, the solicitor representing the claimant, made no submissions and, in the absence of which, it appeared that DDJ NAME made the error of practising law from the bench. A further fact that renders the possession order void.
Similarly, his ill-founded claim that the hearing loop was tested by court officers who have no hearing issues, is also rejected as being, legally and medically, fallacious.
Throughout the ‘hearing’ on 17th November, 2023, I repeatedly informed the court that I could barely hear and that 90% of what the Judge was stating was inaudible. DDJ NAME ignored my statements and insisted that he be allowed to plough on and that “we will do our best.” This attempt to ignore my attestation of deafness was self-evidently a mistake on his part.
In short, at every turn, I was denied a fair hearing on the simple basis that I cannot hear. DDJ NAME knew this and mistakenly chose to carry on regardless in order to dismiss my valid application for full disclosure.
Having had four hearings adjourned on the basis I was at a massive disadvantage, I made it plain that I could not and would not take part in any more proceedings until such a time as I am able to take part with adequate hearing assistance.
Under these circumstances, I motion the court to find that there has been no meaningful hearing on the basis my hearing disability has rendered me unable to hear virtually anything that has been said by DDJ NAME and the three previous judges. Therefore, it my contention that the entire proceedings thus far are null and void, ab initio, as I stated in Court at the end of the session on 17th November, 2023.
All of which was made plain in my application to set aside DDJ NAME’s order. Nevertheless, in contradiction of any and all Due Process of the Law, my application was rejected without reason.
Subject to this, I stated to all parties that I was demonstrably incapable of taking part in the hearing of [DATE IN JANUARY].
In the light of which it appears that a hearing did take place and that it is from said that the order for possession has been procured. This leads me to the reasonable conclusion that the Claimant has dishonestly taken advantage of my deafness and non-attendance in order to obtain the order. This breach of due process is on all fours with a breach of the Disability Act, 2010.
In any event and in such circumstances, DDJ NAME’s rejection of my part 18 Application of [DATE] for full disclosure of the original documents the claimant is relying on in support of its (fraudulent) claim is an error at law. In support of which, I cite Bracegirdle v Oxley and Canley [1947] KB349, in which Lord Bingham stated: “it is obviously perverse and an error of law to make a finding of fact for which there is no evidential foundation.”
The witness statements of Alfie Drysdale and Noreen Akif are inadmissible as per the herein listed authorities which makes it plain that only an officer employed by the purported lender can verify the accounts and the value of the alleged debt. Neither of the aforementioned employees of Ascent Legal have any first hand knowledge of the accounting transactions of the purported loan and are relying solely on hearsay.
DJ NAME acted in contradiction of what the High Court have confirmed. Namely, that banks are required to satisfy strict proofs in enforcing claims against debtors. The provisions of the Bankers’ Books Evidence Act 1879 (as amended) (the “Act”) provide for the admissibility of copies of entries from the books and records of a bank against a defendant as prima facie evidence of their contents. Where a bank fails to strictly comply with the provisions of the Act, the evidence of the bank will be inadmissible in enforcing its claim against the debtor.
The facts and outcome of Dermody will be of significant importance to the purchasers and servicers of loans. It is, of course, my contention that the Claimant lost any and all rights of chose when it, on the balance of probabilities, securitised the purported mortgage note. That is why it is crucial that this order is not allowed to stand: the Claimant is merely acting in the role of collection agent and this is reliant upon a fraudulent conveyance, namely the Deed of Mortgage.
In Dermody the High Court dismissed the claim of the plaintiff bank (Ulster Bank Ireland Limited (“UBIL”)) in circumstances where the person swearing the affidavit setting out the bank’s evidence was an employee of a third party (which was a related company charged with the collection of debts due to UBIL) and had been authorised by UBIL pursuant to a power of attorney to swear the affidavit. This decision is in line with the High Court’s decision in Bank of Scotland plc v Stapleton [2012] IEHC 549 regarding Certus, the servicer charged with the management of the loans due to Bank of Scotland plc.
The cumulative effect of these High Court decisions is that:

• The records of the bank are inadmissible save where the provisions of the Act are complied with.

• The evidence must be provided by an employee of the bank and not a representative of some other company to whom the task of collecting the debt has been outsourced.

• It remains open to the person in the bank who created the original document to give direct evidence.

It is my contention that by mistakenly stating that there is no requirement for the bank to provide the original charging instrument, the fraudulently conveyed Deed of Mortgage, DDJ NAME demonstrated a blatant bias in favour of the Claimant.

No Disclosure

Further, his written order also contradicted what I was told by the witnesses who were present and will testify as such, that he stated on the day of the hearing that he would only dismiss two parts of the CPR 18 application for full disclosure and allow the rest to stand. Again this shows his extreme bias in favour of the Claimant. Unless the Claimant is put to strict proof of Claim it would appear it is being treated as though it is above the Law, a Too Big To Fail (TBTF) ‘protected’ financial entity and it can conceal facts which are prejudicial to its claim and vital to my defence, this would be unconscionable.
It is a central tenet of Law that the Court has to come to a fair and just judgement based on all the facts. In this case, I have been alleging the Deed of Mortgage was a fraudulent conveyance from the outset. As an Officer of the Court DDJ NAME mistakenly ruled that the Claimant did not need to provide strict proof of Claim, an error which has the effect of aiding and abetting the perpetuation of a fraud on the Court. The High Court have confirmed that banks are required to satisfy strict proofs in enforcing claims against debtors, which will have significant practical implications for lenders contemplating the outsourcing of debt collection and the purchase of loans. The provisions of the Bankers’ Books Evidence Act 1879 (as amended) (the “Act”) provide for the admissibility of copies of entries from the books and records of a bank against a defendant as prima facie evidence of their contents. Where a bank fails to strictly comply with the provisions of the Act, the evidence of the bank will be inadmissible in enforcing its claim against the debtor.
Source: Ulster Bank Ireland Limited v Dermody, [2014] IEHC 140 andACC Bank plc v Byrne & Others, unreported, 31 July 2014 which held that the business records of a bank were inadmissible as evidence of the truth of their contents save where the rigorous provisions of the Act were complied with.
Of course, the reliance of the Claimant on a fraudulently conveyed deed of mortgage, a non-existent valid mortgage agreement/contract (as per S 1 (3) of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1989 – the Law of Mortgages), the failure to provide disclosure of the accounting of the transactions of the alleged loan and its losses, as per the Banker’s Books Evidence Act, 1879, and a valid Power of Attorney, also stands as a manifest breach of the 750 year old Observance of due Process of Law 1368, section 3 which states:
“None shall be put to answer without due Process of Law. At the Request of the Commons by their Petitions put forth in this Parliament, to eschew the Mischiefs and Damages done to divers of his Commons by false Accusers, which oftentimes have made their Accusations more for Revenge and singular Benefit, than for the Profit of the King, or of his People, which accused Persons, some have been taken, and sometime caused to come before the King’s Council by Writ, and otherwise upon grievous Pain against the Law: It is assented and accorded, for the good Governance of the Commons, that no Man be put to answer without Presentment before Justices, or Matter of Record, or by due Process and Writ original, according to the old Law of the Land: And if any Thing from henceforth be done to the contrary, it shall be void in the Law, and holden for Error.”
Consequently, it stands to reason that [NAME OF JUDGE WHO ISSUED THE POSSESSION ORDER] failed to apply the law correctly. It is also taken as a fact that he is, therefore, well aware that Nat West PLC’s claim is reliant upon a fraudulently conveyed Deed of Mortgage and, consequently, the Claimant thus has no standing whatsoever to begin a possession claim.
In clear breach of said precedent, the DDJ mistakenly deemed that mere photocopies and electronic scans of the Deed of Mortgage were to be deemed acceptable when I have material evidence that said Deed is a forgery.
Further, the DDJ also chose to ignore the salient point of law that makes it plain that only a suitably qualified officer of the alleged lender and false claimant, Nat West Plc.

In accord with the foregoing, it necessarily follows that the enclosed possession order of [Name of Judge], is void on the grounds stated herein and must be set aside.
Therefore, the County Court is required to set its orders aside without delay. It must also be stressed that the court does not have the necessary jurisdiction to refuse to do so, as per the judgments of Lord Greene in Craig v Kanssen Craig v Kanssen [1943] 1 KB 256); Upjohn LJ in Re Pritchard [1963]; and Lord Denning in Firman v Ellis [1978] and that there must be a general adjournment in proceedings until such a time as I am able to hear satisfactorily and that the application for full disclosure be reinstated in line with the cited authorities.

Statement of Truth

I, the man known as Name of Defendant, having first hand knowledge of the above facts, am competent to testify to the the veracity of this affidavit, and declare that the foregoing is true, correct and complete under penalty of perjury.

Autograph ___________________

DATE

FOOTNOTE: none of this is to be taken as legal advice. As I have stated time after time, the British Courts are a captured operation, fit only for the purpose of subjugating the Law for the benefit of the tyrannical state and its banking overlords.

However, should you be in a similar position – i.e a Court has issued a void order against you and you want it set aside, then feel free to drop me a line. Remember, a void order is just that and you have every right to have it set aside and/or refuse to accept it.

Should you also be appreciative of my work, then please don’t hesitate to drop a few quid in the pot via the Buy Me a Coffee button.

Further reading of the matters referenced in the Rogue Cast:

Car finance banking scam
False vaccination record

February 21, 2024 1

Episode 30: Into the Void

Into the Void – how the British Courts are a captured operation.

In this latest Rogue Ramble, I consider the state of the British Judiciary in the light of the recent High Court perverse pronouncement that Richard D Hall will not be allowed to adduce into the evidence his considerable body of facts surrounding the Manchester Arena event of 2017. As well as producing a series of films concerning the various anomalies of the official narrative, he has written a book on the matter which is some 400+ pages in length on the event.

Unfortunately, the perversity of the High Court decision is one which permeates throughout the British Judicial system whereby single judges are given the status of judge, jury and executioner. The Great British Mortgage Swindle is another case in point and I also consider how a single judge at Nottingham County Court has issued a void order for possession of my good friend Steve’s home, scheduled for Tuesday, 20th February, 2024. Whilst Steve will make an application to have this void order set aside, one cannot trust the County Court to do what is lawful and so we will be prepared for any attempt at plundering him of his home.

If you are of the view that the Post Office scandal is a deplorable state of affairs, I would urge you to consider the Great British Mortgage Swindle, a thousand year fraud that continues to this day and affects some 11 million so-called mortgagors.

There are many lickspittles out there who will support their dark overlords and spout BS about how it is nonsense but they are cowards who know not their elbows from their arses and have not delved into the facts of the matter, as detailed in the mind-blowing documentary, TGBMS. These facts are easily proven, namely,

There is no evidence to suggest that the licenced lender has not sold on (securitised) the mortgage and is no longer the Holder in Due Course of the charging instrument, aka the Deed of Mortgage

There is no evidence of a loan

There is no lawful agreement (contract)  Without any and all of these items, a possession claim is fraudulent.

In short and as many readers and viewers will appreciate, we are living in a world of lies in which the truth has been inverted and perverted by a coterie of satanic Jewish financial fraudsters and parasites commonly known as the House of Rothschild who are supported by privately educated lickspittles who populate the courts and the numerous firms of solicitors who lie and commit perjury each and every time they initiate possession proceedings for and on behalf of their dark overlords.

Episode 29 – A Tale from the Riverbank

A cautionary tale from the banks of the River Trent

“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” George Santayana

In this Rogue Ramble, I roam over the subject of those peoples who are inordinately over-represented in the various mental constructs of tyranny and the one ring that controls it all – MONEY.

The ramble takes in the real nature of childhood expressions, our deep rooted understandings, the machinations of organised Jewry down through the ages, who owns the majority of the media, Hollywood, the financial systems, who controls Israel and who established it as a Rothschild Fiefdom, who invented all the systems of control via paper securities and other financial instruments, who is that is financing the limited hangouts, where does the funding come from Marxist organisations like Black Lives Matter, the Chabbad tunnels under Brooklyn Synagogue, why throughout history have Jews been expelled from so many countries, 1290 Edict of Expulsion, why did the native population take such a dislike to them, what was the real reason? Are the Blood libel accusations of former times reflected in the actions of those involved in the construction of the Chabbad tunnels under Brooklyn Synagogue in New York? After all,

“The beginning of anything is to be found out by the Unfolding of Historical Events.” Firmicus Maternus.

Who controls all the narrative? Who owns the publishing houses, the news agencies?

In ‘Extracts from the Jewish World’ by Itamar Eichner (published 09.11.2006), he states,

“The Edict of Expulsion, passed by King Edward I in 1290 and calling for all Jews to leave Britain, has never formally been revoked. In order to rescind it, Queen Elizabeth II must sign a contrasting decree.”

King Edward I decided in 1290 to evict all Jews from Britain. The reasons for this were largely related to the inordinate amount of financial control and debt that the Jewish money-changers had accrued but there was also a series of allegations of blood libel against the Jews. Given the Zionist ownership and control of the world’s publishing houses, higher education and the media, it is hardly surprising that 99% of the information on the web takes the view that the blood libels were the imaginary creations of a primitive, unreasonably prejudiced and superstitious people who were suspicious of their Jewish neighbours.

Of course, there is no smoke without fire and whilst no critical thinker should discount the blood libels as fictitious, the reasons for the expulsion were certainly of a financial origin:

“In England, King Edward of the Plantagenet Dynasty was troubled by the fact that by this time the Jewish companies had bankrupted the English. He was under pressure by the people who accused the Jews of exploitative financial practices related to their dominance in the banking business.

Unfortunately, Edward saw that once the Jewish financial stranglehold takes over, there is never a peaceful resolution. other European monarchs saw this and also expelled the Jews from their kingdoms. As history is rewritten over and over again by authors submitting their research to Jewish editors in the Jewish publishing houses of Europe and America since the 1940s, the reasons that the European monarchs expelled the Jews so many hundreds of times over a 15 century period is altered. We are told today that anti-Semitism was the reason while all along it was for financial reasons.

The Edict of Expulsion was enacted on November 1, the ancient Day of the Dead, and many of these Jews would relocate to Spain where exactly 202 years later on the EXACT SAME DAY, the Spanish crown wold again expel the Jews in 1492 AD on the same day Christopher Columbus set sail for the New World.”

Source: Chronicon by Jason Breshears

History is circular, it flows in wave forms like the ripples across a lake. Mirrors of the past are to be found in our present. The echoes of former times are to be found in current times.

There is nothing new under the sun.

Is the unveiling of the tunnels beneath the Chabbad synagogue in Brooklyn an echo of previous uncoverings of nefarious Jewish activities?

Is the Rothschild controlled World Financial system and its WEF diktats about to be rejected by the people as it has been in previous times? Are the people becoming increasingly pissed off with the machinations of those who control it all and who regard themselves as superior to the ‘Goyim’?

All will become apparent at some point but some are already tuning into the zeitgeist and the potents are beginning to emerge.

Let’s leave the last word to those who knew too that life goes round and round,

“It is impossible to understand the present without the profoundest knowledge of the past.” Gerald Massey, 1885.

“The last pages of a book are already contained in the first pages.” Albert Camus

“If we knew all the past, we would know all the future.” P.D Ouspenksy

Thank you very much for listening. if you’ve enjoyed it please like, subscribe, comment and share with others of a like mind. Should you have any suggestions for future episodes, then let me know; I’d be interested to hear what you think.

Finally, if you’d like to show your appreciation of this and my other Rogue Casts, then perhaps you could consider buying me a coffee at the link on my site or here. Thank you to all my kind readers, especially David R for his wonderful support.

January 20, 2024 2

Episode 28: The Buddha of Brassington

The Buddha of Brassington

In this Rogue Cast, recorded on Sunday, 7th January, I take a ramble around the hills near Carsington in Derbyshire.

The area has a long history of lead mining and the landscape is littered with the former workings and shafts.

Some three hundred years ago, the author Daniel Defoe was on a tour of the lands of Britain and described an encounter with a lead miner,

“He (the lead miner) was as lean as a skeleton, pale as a dead corpse, his hair and head a deep black, his flesh lank, and, as we thought, something of the colour of lead itself.” Daniel Defoe, 1727.

The ramble begins with me ruminating briefly over a journey I made to India and the Himalaya some years ago, how I studied the practicalities of Buddhism and the book (Fuck the Buddha) that emerged from that time. It includes an explanation of the expression,

“If you meet the Buddha on the road, kill him.”

I then amplify my take on the current Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak the grifter without a soul.

It is a ramble that takes in lead mining, quarries, walking the walk, how the UK Gov is a captured operation, the trap of organised religion, Justin Welby’s knighthood for services to genocide, the industrial landscape of the Peak District, past and present, Bankster Greed, the one ring to control it all, the insatiable lust for power, genocide, a WW2 Royal Observation Corps watch tower, the former High Peak Railway, a mass shooting in a quarry and the monstrosity of wind farms, before closing the 6 mile circle.

Thank you for watching.

In the meantime, if you are able, please consider making a donation via the Buy Me a Coffee button in support of my work in exposing the Great British Mortgage Swindle and the other various scams that hold sway in this crazy realm. All the best to each and every reader, especially David R who has supported my efforts for a number of years now and a big thank you to those who have recently made donations.

Episode 27: Flooded

Flooded: A Rogue Ramble Near Trent Bridge

In this episode, recorded on 5th January, 2024, I take a short ramble along the Nottingham Canal to the River Trent to see the extent of the recent flooding that has occurred. I begin by considering how Rishi Sunak is a soul-less WEF insider, as exemplified by his cringeworthy Christmas ‘Home Alone’ skit and his recent visit to Nottinghmashire, where amongst the aged Young Conservatives at the youth centre location was the Criminal Commissioner for Notts Police The UK Gov has been captured by foreign agencies. The foreigners who have infiltrated the UK State are many and each has been placed there by the overlords of the World Economic Forum (WEF) . What’s the point of skateboarding? The river Trent reached its highest level since the year 2000 when it was 5.5m above its usual height.

Episode 26: Black Bull

Black Bull – A Rogue Ramble up the Derwent

Featuring some cock and bull stories from the world of absurdity that lies all around us, this week’s Rogue Cast, recorded near Belper on 17th December, 2023, is a ramble along the river Derwent and the hills and valleys near Belper which also features real bulls/bullocks. .

Topics covered: the #3DartFinish, the passing of performance poet Benjamin Zephaniah, they shoot footballers, don’t they?, the collapse of Tom Lockyer from heart attack, his second such experience in 6 months, the attempted whitewash that is the Parliamentary Divoc 91 enquiry, germ theory, the false pandemic, the Black Bull, price of a pint, bankrupt councils, false LOBO loans, public debt is same as personal debt – a mirage, interest payments on public loans, the globalist financiers want it all – total control, I Am That I Am, are we in a simulation?, the map is not the terrain.

Whilst my previous Rogue Cast was banned within hours on You Tube, probably as a result of my reference to the devastating release by Barry West, the whistleblower, about the deaths in New Zealand that have occurred as a direct consequence of the vile vials injected by way of the 3Dart Finish, I refuse to shy away from the subject, so this RogueCast will be posted on Rumble.

The route:

December 18, 2023 0

Black Bull

A Cock and Bull Tale

This is but a preamble to my latest Rogue Cast which should be uploaded later today, all being well.

A number of UK councils have declared or are on the verge of bankruptcy. Here in Nottingham, the City Council has declared itself to be bankrupt.

This gives rise to the question – where are my CT payments going?

In Nottingham’s case, some £38m was ‘lost’ in its notorious ‘Robin Hood Energy’ venture.

However, I would posit that across the country, a sizeable chunk of the CT collected goes directly into interest payments made to the like of Barclays over LOBO loans which were taken out by the councils.

As I wrote back in 2017,

The Great British Mortgage Swindle is an example of how the banks steal money via the very homes we live in and the LOBO loans taken out by many councils from c. 2003 to 2012 are another stark example.

Lender option borrower option or lender’s option borrower’s option (LOBO) is a long term borrowing instrument available in the United Kingdom. They involve periodic interest re-fixings, which incorporates two linked options:

lender’s option: option for the lender to set revised (usually higher) interest rates at predetermined interest reset dates such as annually.

borrower’s option: linked option for the borrower (exercisable only if the lender’s option is exercised) to pay the revised interest rate or to redeem the bond although that may involve exit fees.

They are provided by banks and the loan contract runs for between 40 and 70 years. There is no regulatory body responsible for overseeing their use … Campaign group Debt Resistance UK researched LOBOs using the Freedom of Information Act.Banks, such as Barclays and Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS), provide LOBO loans to about 240 UK councils (63% of all councils in 2013) with a total value of £15 billion. Out of this £15 billion it is estimated that about £1 billion in upfront profits was made by the lenders. LOBOs are currently almost a fifth of all council borrowing.

LOBOs were recommended to councils by specialist financial advisers who, unknown to the council, were in turn paid commission by the banks providing the LOBOs.

At least 12 councils have the most expensive types of LOBO loan. Most of these have “inverse floaters” taken out with RBS – interest rates for the loan are increased if general bank lending rates decrease.

As a direct consequence of making repayments on LOBOs, councils have had to make major cuts in services to their residents. It has been calculated that if councils were free to relinquish their LOBO contracts at no penalty and instead borrow at a more typical market rate it would save them about £145 million for 2015 alone. Some councils are considering taking legal action. source

For instance, take Kirklees Council in West Yorkshire: this comment from the local newspaper summarises it neatly:

“Kirklees have L.O.B.O loans for £500 million to be repaid in the future, you are paying £4 million a year interest, you seem reluctant to mention this. I suggest everybody googles lobo loans and and Kirklees liability it makes interesting reading.” source

Interest payments on the purported loans are taken to service the debt directly from the people via unlawful council tax. A fake debt at that. Just like a mortgage. No consideration by the banks. No disclosure as to how the credit is created and disguised as a ‘loan’.

Some of these loans have a 90 year longevity, which means that unless they are extinguished, future generations will be paying for the folly of those who were responsible for taking them out.

However, the fact is that the loans are fake, just like individual loans and credit card payments. The credit is stolen and misrepresented as a loan.

Any CEO and Chief Financial Officer could, if he had the knowledge and the courage, discharge the fake loans simply by following the Equitable Common Law Lien process.

In other news, the poet Benjamin Zephaniah died last week, apparently from a brain tumour which was diagnosed just 8 weeks ago.

I don’t know for sure that he had the 3 Dart Finish but it appears he had certainly fallen for the Divoc 91 Psy-op, “He told Sky News’ After The Pandemic programme:

“I am quite nervous about [physical interaction], just because I know of the realities.”

If I were a betting man, my money would be on him having rolled up his sleeve to take the deadly serum, delivered at needlepoint.

In any event, he could not have known the realities, as he puts it, of the fake plandemic and the poisonous dart due to fraud by non-disclosure.

So my question is this: was he killed by the shots?   Ironically, he writes this in one of his patois poems. This a typical example of his poetry:

“Dis poetry is like a riddim dat drops
De tongue fires a riddim dat shoots like shots
Dis poetry is designed fe rantin

Dance hall style, big mouth chanting,”

Now, I do have some experience when it comes to poetry, both as a poet and a performer and it is fair to state that many of the most entertaining performance poets rely excessively on repetition and colloquial dialect. The depth is lacking but people enjoy the performance regardless. So it was with Mr Z.

In 2021, I wrote an article. They Shoot Footballers, Don’t they? about the sudden spate of professional footballers (and other athletes) who were dropping like flies on the field of play. The issue has not gone away and in a high profile incident that took place at AFC Bournemouths’s ground, Dean Court, the Luton Town player, Tom Lockyer collapsed with heart issues, just over 6 months after he had similarly collapsed and had to have heart surgery. He was passed fit to play but, right now, there must be a question mark over his ability to continue in a profession populated by some of the fittest athletes in the world.

Whilst my previous Rogue Cast was banned within hours on You Tube, probably as a result of my reference to the devastating release by Barry Young, the whistleblower, about the deaths in New Zealand that have occurred as a direct consequence of the vile vials injected by way of the 3Dart Finish, I refuse to shy away from the subject, so the next RogueCast will be posted on Rumble.

December 18, 2023 1

25: The River Leen & the Lien Process

In this ramble along the River Leen in Nottingham, we examine further the steps that the individual can take against those who are committing fraud against him, with specific reference to the Common Law Equitable Lien process.

Following on from Episode 24, topics include, the Bankrupt councils, where are your payments going?, the unlawfulness of Council Tax, how there is no lawful agreement, the criminality of UK government, great news about Michael O’Bernicia, the dangers of women in public office, the matriarchy at work, one great fudge, unsuitability of women in authority, devoid of logic and reason, walking the walk, empowerment of the individual, how wisdom is the application of knowledge and experience, the Calvinator Vs Santander, Equivo, reliance on the facts, only a bank official can sign a witness statement claiming payments are due under a valid contract, the Land Registry is sitting on a massive fraud whereby over 11 million UK mortgages are demonstrably illegal, null and void. The weakest links in the system, the Achilles Heel of lawyers, bankers, politicians. The counter balance is the urge to freedom, history shows us compliance only leads to tyranny. NZ Winston Smith Whistleblower revealing the data, NZ Dept writes to RogueMale over links to 3facedTerrorist. Culpability of individuals who jabbed the people with untested death serum, Divoc 91 originating in 1967 from the Welcome Trust, a eugenics operation, as laid out to a panel at UK Parliament, by David Martin, 05/12/23, the ingredients of which were never disclosed. As ever it was, YOU are the remedy to whatever troubles you.

Links:

Email Rogue Male: roguemale@thinkfree.org.uk

Michael’s latest post re his daughter

Further reading: the 4 part series of articles referenced in the RogueCast:

Part 1 https://roguemale.org/2023/11/20/your-deed-of-mortgage-is-in-a-world-bank-foreign-vault/

Part 2 https://roguemale.org/2023/11/24/british-courts-under-foreign-control-pt-2/

Part 3 https://roguemale.org/2023/11/27/no-deed-no-possession-claim-pt-3/

Part 4 https://roguemale.org/2023/11/29/globalism-the-remedy-is-you-part-4/

December 10, 2023 3

Author: ROGUE MALE