The Lie of Circumcision – Why I love the truth and despise those who lie.
If there is one thing which I am strongly averted to it is lying.
This is by no means an easy stance to take when we live in a realm of lies – a construct in which we are lied to by each and every agency of a state apparatus that is in thrall of the Father of Lies himself – the demiurge, Lucifer or Satan, call him/it what you will.
Deceit is the currency of this systemic net that captures so many and those who serve it are well-rewarded for their services to its manifest deceptions.
White lies, fibs, untruths, distortions of the fats – all of them swirl around us like fog on a drear November morning.
The tag line of the Rogue Male is,
“IN TRUTH AND HONOUR”
and it is the principle under which I stand or fall. Some may say that is a bold claim and they would be correct in terms of what this world is.
But boldness brings its own rewards and a man who loves the Truth and remains in Honour is a force to be reckoned with for he is not captured, snagged or befuddled by the thickets of lies and the brambles of falsehoods that others are.
That may mean he is a rarity, a shining emerald in a pile of shite, who is infused with light – for the Truth is beauty and that is all we need to know.
This life is a game of Hide and Seek – one in which the honourable man has a ready and joyful quality about him, a lightness of touch that comes from not lying.
If that sounds ridiculously simplistic then stop reading now.
The individual who refuses to swim in the odorous effluence is like a trout who is pushing, gliding and jumping his way upstream regardless of the putrid currents he finds himself in.
As I write this, I am aware that such is the all-enveloping quality of this whirlpool of lies that a truthful and honest individual is all-too-rare as most around him go with the flow.
And yet there are those of who detest the lies to such an extent that they get falsely labelled as ‘conspiracy theorists’ or ‘truthers’ on the simple basis that the go against the grain, the very fabric of a fabricated world built on lies. To those who peddle lies and deceit, the individual is crazy for his refusal to go with the flow.
The ancients of these lands had a maxim that remains eternal.
“the Truth Against the World,”
and I love it.
Of course, in a valid court of law, the facts are crucial in determining the innocence or guilt of an individual or whatever the issue is that is being presented.
One key piece of legislation in support of this si the Fraud Act, 2006 which reminds us that a lie can be a misrepresentation or an omission.
To reiterate: if there is one ting I despise it is being lied to. It is also to be noted that this stance is what led me, inevitably, into taking on the deceptive might of the Great British Mortgage Swindle, a racket born out of a system of intentional financial enslavement which is wholly dependent on lies, whether they be misrepresentations or omissions, both of which operate in any swindle.
The following article was released back in 2013 and it is about the genital mutilation of infant boys.
I’m revisiting it as it’s an example of a particularly egregious lie which deeply affected me in ways that were difficult to process and which, to a lesser extent now, continued to affect me until I wrote about it and came to the realisation that I am, in truth, not my body and not my brain or even my thoughts; but that I am, in truth, an immortal personality who, in the final analysis, is journeying through a challenging construct that cannot truly harm me.
My mother passed away some three weeks ago and, as I’ve stated before, when I was a child, she constantly reminded me of a number of incontrovertible maxims (truths) and an early one was,
“Tell the truth and shame the devil.”
Unfortunately, my mother, may God bless her, did not always practice what she preached.
As the article reveals, whenever I asked her (or my dad) the reason why my penis was mutilated, she would become evasive and repeated those lies which she had been fed by the medical practitioners who I now know to be working for a Death Cult. A Death Cult that she foolishly put her trust in and which killed her in the end.
I trust the reader will appreciate it and, if able, tip me a few quid for via the Buy Me a Coffee button. Thank you for your support.
[NOTE: THE FOLLOWING CONTAINS GRAPHIC CONTENT THAT SOME MAY FIND DISTURBING.]
~ AN UNCONSCIONABLE ACT OF VIOLENCE ~
The genital mutilation of baby boys for religious and/or erroneous medical reasons is nothing less than an extreme act of violence towards a defenceless being who was born perfect. It is psychological, spiritual and emotional abuse against a divine being that is born whole:
“An infant boy is born with a healthy foreskin. Consequently, there are no medical indications for circumcision in the newborn period. Infant circumcision is a painful, stressful, and traumatic procedure that leaves the infant exhausted and debilitated to the extent that some are unable to suckle at the breast.” Source: www.DoctorsOpposingCircumcision.org
As such, it is a palpable act of genocide as defined under International Law,
“Article II: In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group. LINK
Definition:
“The word circumcision means “to cut around”. In male infants, circumcision is an operation which involves tearing the foreskin away from the glans (head) of the penis, cutting along the top of the foreskin, then clamping the foreskin and cutting it off. The skin of the penis is a complex movable ‘sheath’ with no clear indication of where it should be cut during a circumcision. This means that the amount of foreskin removed from one circumcision to the next can be very different, and no two circumcisions are the same.”
As a victim of this barbaric and morally repugnant act, it is reasonable to suppose that I am understandably pissed off at this state of affairs. The act is, there was a time when ne’er a day went by without it entering my mind at some point. This was especially true in the winter months in which no-one feels the cold quite as keenly as the circumcised male. People will think I’m joking and they would be wrong. This essay is not going to go into the mechanics of the process but it will examine some of the long term consequences which, although personal to the me, remain true for each and every male who has been subjected to this form of genital mutilation.
The photograph above is the last known image of my young self with an intact foreskin. I am seated with my two grandfathers, both of whom are from lineages that are rooted in the North of these lands known as Britain, a fact which rules out a religious explanation of the butchery. Sometime after this, under the deceptive advice of an NHS ‘health visitor’, this infant boy was subjected to an act of brutal surgery, carried out without anaesthetic, which removed some 50% of the infant penis. The psychological, emotional and physical consequences of such wholly unnecessary barbarism lasted for half a century later.
An interesting aspect to this is the response of most women. Compassion and empathy from the female are in short supply when it comes to male circumcision but imagine the outcry if ‘hygenic’ genital mutilation was being carried out on baby girls who, soon after birth, were subjected to a clitoridectomy? Upon being shown the image below, my sister, rather than displaying horror at the image of 5 baby boys, mutilated and in agony, stated, “Oh, it’s probably just some religious reason.”
The exact circumstances of how I came to be circumcised remains as unclear and silent as my mother when asked about it. However, we can state that it was not done for religious reasons.
Rather, it was carried out under the false pretext of the quack medicine that continues to inflict every aspect of the tyannical UK state’s so-called ‘health care’.
The fact is it was my mother’s choice who, knowing fuck all about the purpose of the foreskin, went along with the suggestion of the health visitor that her baby boy’s foreskin was ‘too tight’ and therefore it was necessary to slice it off. The oft-repeated fallacy that it was somehow more hygienic and that the male would be less prone to sexual disease was trotted out to me throughout my childhood, especially when I asked my dad why his penis was intact. You see, there is no excuse and no medical reason for such an act of violence. It is the equivalent of a parent consenting to an unnecessary operation removing a baby’s finger or a toe. A child is born whole, he is a divine creation and, if one chooses to believe in the teachings of all religions, no one is between him and the Creator/God. He is born perfect and no parent has the right to decide whether or not his body parts should be removed.
The psychological trauma of the experience (always carried out with no anaesthetic, remember) is well-documented:
“Memory starts before birth and newborn infants have fully functioning pain pathways. One would expect, therefore, to find psychological effects associated with the painful genital cutting operation.
“Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a normal response to an abnormal event. Neonatal genital cutting is an event in which a newborn infant experiences extreme levels of pain, terror, and helplessness, so it fulfills the criteria as a psychogenic for PTSD. Levy (1945) reported that children experience behavior problems, such as night terrors and a fear of nurses and doctors, after surgery, including circumcision. Cansever (1965) tested boys before and after circumcison and reported that the ego seeks safety in total withdrawal. Levy found their symptoms to be similar to combat neurosis, now known as PTSD. Taddio et al. (1997) studied the behavior of babies at first vaccination.
“They found that circumcised boys have a much stronger reaction to pain of vaccination than do girls and intact non-circumcised boys, which the authors suggested is an “infant analogue” of PTSD. Other authors also have reported PTSD in circumcised males. Rhinehart (1999) reported four cases of PTSD secondary to neonatal circumcision in middle-aged men that he encountered in his psychiatric practice. Ramos & Boyle (2001) reported PTSD in 70 percent of Philippino boys who experienced ritual circumcision and 51 percent of Philippino boys who experienced medical circumcision.” (LINK)
One of the most deleterious effects is of this act of butchery is upon the bond between the child and his mother. At such a young age, the baby is wholly dependent upon the love and nurturing of his parents, but especially the mother with whom he is forming a bond.
“Because children should be protected from permanent bodily alteration inflicted on them without their consent in the name of culture, religion, profit, or parental preference. Under accepted bioethical principles, parents can consent to surgery on behalf of a child only if it is necessary to protect the child’s life or health. “Routine” circumcision fails this test because it painfully and permanently removes a normal and healthy part of a boy’s penis, does not protect the child’s life or health, and in fact creates new risks. Removing the foreskin is no more justified than removing a finger or any other healthy body part.” LINK
When the baby boy is taken into the brightly-lit operating theatre, to be bombarded by glaring lights, faced with cult-like figures in masks and gowns, with stainless steel knives glinting above and around him, he is rendered entirely helpless, torn from the protection of his mother, the butchery leaves him deeply traumatised and, more often than not, this severs the tie between him and his mother. The trust has gone and deep in his psyche, there may well lurk a mistrust of women that will stay with him throughout his life, whether or not he chooses to admit it. It will also leave him with a high level distrust of anyone in a white surgical coat, hospitals, doctors, dentists, nurses and, it has to be said, anyone in authority.
This may lead the boy into an adult life of numerous short term relationships, none lasting more than a short period and one characterised by him never being able to offer the levels of commitment and trust required for him to be a husband or father. I state that not out of frustration but rather as a matter of fact. It deeply traumatised me and whilst I have in the past made light of it, the fact remains I have only (within the last two years) really begun to look into it and to unravel the long term consequences of the brutality and its effects on my psyche.
Are there any positives to be taken from it? Mmm. A higher, almost supra-human, tolerance of physical pain? For sure ~ as a child my mother (again, misplacing her trust in the medical profession) took me to a dentist by the name of A.K Varma, who used to practice his butchery in the town of Huddersfield. He was, I now realise, a sadist, who would drill holes into my teeth in order to fit unnecessary composite fillings, which contain mercury. He did not use an anaesthetic and I can remember a contest of wills would develop with me gripping the arms of the chair, staring into his black eyes above the mask, challenging him to test me. As I write this, it occurs to me that the circumcision made me able to tolerate and endure physical pain when it would have been more natural for me to rebel, tell the fuckers to stop and take flight. In this way, I came to realise that I was here to suffer, that cruelty and pain are the name of the game on planet earth and you’d better get used to it. I don’t believe that is a healthy state of mind to have and whilst it never turned me into a psychopathic bully, there have been moments when I have verged on it. Throughout my childhood, I was subjected to nightmares in which I was being pursued by a dark entity which may well have been, as I now realise, a form of re-experiencing the trauma or, more directly expressed,
Satan was out to get me
If one looks into the well-documented operations of mind controllers upon children, one comes to understand how trauma splinters the mind into thousands of pieces and thereby makes it easier for the victims to be controlled. It also teaches him an insidious form of learned helplessness and a deep distrust of all those who would seek to have any form of authority over him. That is a most healthy state of mind to develop but it has come at a price. The fact that most males in the land mass known as America have undergone this brutality is also worthy of note too:
“Social Effects”
“Laumann (1997) reported that 77 percent of the adult males in the National Health and Social Life Survey (1992) were circumcised. The effects of this wounding by circumcision have been discussed above. Goldman (1997) argues extensively that the result of having so many emotionally and sexually injured males in a society would produce undesirable social effects.
Goldman (1997) suggests that men who were neonatally circumcised would be more likely to suffer from low self-esteem, to avoid intimacy in male-female relationships, and a higher incidence of divorce. Moreover, he says neonatal circumcision may cause a higher incidence of unnecessary surgery, and of adult violence, including suicide, rape, and murder.
Baker (1996) argues that men harbor rage toward their mothers for their circumcision. She also identifies a connection between sexual violence, rape, and neonatal circumcision. DeMause (1996) connects perinatal circumcision trauma with increases in teenage suicide and social violence.” LINK
Conclusion:
Circumcision is, quite simply, an attack on the sacred masculine spirit and thus is a brutal attempt to emasculate the male and it eminates from the demiurge. This is one of myriad assaults on him~ vaccinations containing deadly poisons, oestrogen & fluoride in the water, soya lecithins in food, vegan diets, feminism, chemtrails in the air and a media that deliberately promotes disharmony and aggression between the sexes, all the while distracting them from the real harmonic balance of the sacred masculine with its female counterpart.
The demonic social engineering at play is self-evidently one of ‘divide and rule’ and, like the butchery of the last two world wars which slaughtered millions of men in their prime, its ultimate effect is to blunt the power of Man’s Sacred Masculine Energy to effect change in these dimensions through his actions. We are at war and the enemy is seeking to cull the Male from taking action against those who would suppress him~ Mark Passio goes into this in some detail here, in his seminal work, “New Age Bullshit and the Suppression of the Sacred Masculine”.
Circumcision is the equivalent of clipping off an Angel’s wings and, like so much of the erroneous bullshit that gets thrust upon the child, it serves to teach him he is worthless and always at the mercy of adults ~ especially his parents. The reader may well be amused at that suggestion right now, but once it seeps into the conscious, the metaphor will serve to reveal the truth of the matter.
Some of us will have to fight without helmets and not by choice. So be it. It may seem we are vulnerable but our would-be oppressors (many of whom have been circumcised themselves) would do well to take note: this Rogue Male has nothing to lose and, in spite of it all, the phallus will rise. The Sacred Masculine cannot be kept down.
Bibliography and Credits:
Well said. Good article. As a woman I want to share that I did not allow this on my son despite his father’s status. I found it interesting that the so-called ‘conventional’ pHARMedicine pushed for it, but my home birth team did not, and did not support it. Both my grandsons are spared too, from my teaching that such is a decision for the owner of the appendage and no one else whatsoever. As a woman I also note differences between my intimate relationships with males of both variety. And it makes me sad indeed. It is a brutal and horrific, totally unnecessary act, except in rare and extreme cases, that I have never and will never support. Bless you for sharing such personal and painful story. (I originally replied to Facebook post, but realised you are no longer on there, so posted a copy on here).
Thank you very much, Caron. When one examines the matter, and it doesn’t take a great deal of fathoming, one can clearly see the dark aspect of so much of what passes for ‘health care’, as exemplified by those draconian measures taken during the scamdemic over the last almost-5 years. The circumcision is, if anything, the most brutal of all the acts faleely perpetuated in the name of ‘health’ or ‘religion’. I applaud your stance with your boys – I know it is more widespread in the USA, is that where you live?
Thank you. I am English, but my children born in Australia, which is basically an additional US state under that Corporation. I had to fight tooth and nail for a home birth, and to get out of my babies having those abominations injected into them. The enforced abominations over here make me sick to the core. I’m a ‘boomerang’ in that I freely live in both England and Australia going back and forth over decades, finding myself away from home (England) at this time, and back in Australia to be full time live in carer for my father, now in a care home, where I visit and continue to care for and sit with him until his passing. Then I will follow my heart. I saw through the medical scam quite young, hence my choices in that regards, anti-abomination stance, anti medical intervention during pregnancy and birth, and that was the 80s. Insofar as that brutal act upon the masculine of which you speak, here in Australia it is normalised as in the US.
A nurturing mother is a real force of nature and it sounds like you are in harmony with your true essence, Caron. Great to hear it. I salute you, all the best from Nottingham, Michael.
Am sure this is what happened to my cousin,probably the latest fad at the time. Yes there’s some evil mfs in white coats,got into alternative health at least 25 years ago,”cancer cures”,chemo therapy especially nothing more than
It strikes me that the NHS is an attractive work-place for those of a sadistic mind-set. Thank you for taking the time to comment, spike,