Author: ROGUE MALE

Sovereign Being Under Natural Law. Educator. Anarchist. Occasional podcaster. Co-producer & protagonist in the film, The Great British Mortgage Swindle. Founding Trustee of Universal Community Trust. Lives in Bernicia & Deira, one of the Stolen Ancestral Lands of Northern Britain.

Carmel Butler’s Treasury Securitisation Report

Securitisation is the method by which the World Government is attempting to steal your assets.

For the last 2 weeks, across a series of 4 articles and in a Rogue Cast, I have detailed the how and why of Klaus Schwab’s notorious pronouncement that “You vill own nothing and be happy.” It is, of course, a fact that Schwab is merely the front man for a financial cartel of Too Big To Fail (TBTF) banks who are owned by a Bolshevik-Zionist clique, of which the Rothschild Family are particularly prominent.

The aim is to take it all, which is why they falsely lay claim to any and all securities like mortgages, derivatives, bonds, debentures etc.

The Carmel Butler report to the Treasury on the burgeoning practice of securitisation warned about this shit-storm back in February, 2009.

The original PDF download of the report at the foot of this post, which includes direct quotations from Carmel’s memorandum on securitisation.

This Memorandum can be used as evidence in a possession claim when the fake lender is refusing to provide the original deed of mortgage.

Memorandum from Carmel Butler

 

Quote CONSUMER AND TAX PAYER

“Let us be clear that the reason for today’s injection is the lack of openness and honesty by the banks on the amount of bad debts that they have on their books”
JOHN McFALL MP [105]

1.  The banks have stated their case. They say: the banking crisis ensued from bad borrowers to bad debts to toxic assets to taxpayer support. The banks with their powerful lobby, powerful public relations and easy access to the media have framed the public debate. Consumers on the other hand do not have such powerful infrastructure to effectively rebut the bankers’ defamatory accusations. This written evidence challenges the bankers’ version and endeavours to dispel the bankers’ myths. The chain of events is rooted in lenders’ abuse of unfettered power to impose unsustainable interest and charges on consumers combined with their determination to avoid contributing to the public purse.

2.  The evidence contained in this memorandum is focused on two fundamental issues. Firstly, the consumer issues that arise in the context of Special Purpose Vehicles (“SPVs”) that are incorporated as securitisation companies who issued the infamous “toxic-assets”; and secondly, the taxpayer heist at the hand of the SPV securitisations companies. The evidence will illuminate the hitherto hidden truth that the tax payer is supporting the profits of foreign owned companies incorporated in tax havens and their private investors.

BRIEF INTRODUCTION

3.  I am British Citizen resident in the UK and a qualified lawyer admitted to practice in New York, U.S.A. I have an LLB Laws from the London School of Economics and a JD (Juris Doctor) from Columbia University, New York. I practiced securities law at Sidley Austin LLP New York office from September 2006 to December 2007. Whilst at Sidley Austin I worked on various Structured Finance transactions such as mortgage securitisations, CDOs and various derivatives. I am also a consumer of a mortgage product that has been securitised. Consequently, as both an ex-practitioner of securitisations and a consumer subjected to a securitisation, the intention is to focus on consumer issues that arise from mortgage securitisations, its central causal role in the banking crisis and its detrimental effect on the economy and public purse.

SUMMARY OVERVIEW

4.  Six key submissions are evidenced in this memorandum:

—  Passing on the Interest Rate Cuts (see paras. 5 to 13). Banks do not pass on the interest rate cuts to borrowers because they do not have that power. That power is vested in the SPV securitisation companies.

—  Openness and Honesty (see paras. 14 to 37). The Government has saved banks from the allegedly bad debts on their books. But banks are unable to say the extent of the bad debt problem. This is because, in truth, there are no bad debts of any significance. Two sleights-of-hand are discussed under the headings “the legal ruse” and “the auditor ruse”. Enlightenment of the combined effect of these manoeuvres explains how the allegedly bad debts appear on the bankers books.

—  The FSA Regulatory Role (paras. 38 to 43). The Practitioners Panel have called for rigorous enforcement of the FSA’s MCOB rules. Consumers would concur with this principle.

—  The Fallacy of Financial Advice (see paras. 44 to 52). The source of this issue is the mortgage originators’ failure to disclose material facts on the products sold to consumers. The lenders’ concealments render independent financial advice a nullity and an academic exercise.

—  The Rule of Law—Repossession or Dispossession? (paras. 53 to 78). The Financial Services Practitioner Panel calls for the faithful application of the rule of law with respect to the performance of contractual obligations. There is no difficulty in concurrence with this principle. Accordingly, the Treasury Committee are invited to consider the SPV securitisation companies performance of its contractual obligations and the effect of their abrogation from such obligations on the functioning of the mortgage market.

—  The Perfect Storm (paras. 79 to 88). The cause of the banking crisis is widely mooted as the abrupt closure of the wholesale money markets in August 2007 but the public debate on why the market seized is conspicuously absent. It is submitted that new tax laws were the catalyst instilling fear which caused the flight.

The money-men fled from securitisation companies on the real prospect of their being called upon to contribute to the Treasury. The liquidity had to be filled. The tax-paying public was rallied to fill the gap and to suffer the economic fall-out. Paragraphs 83 to 86 recommends: a potentially effective solution in which the Government can revive the housing market and economy without the need for the banker’s acquiescence to the hitherto unheeded pleas for the bankers to commence lending.

—  Conclusion (paras. 89 to 91). Confusion through concealment creates complexity. Transparency is the antidote. Once illuminate, securitisation is simple. Follow the asset and follow the cash which reveals that the supreme beneficiaries of the crisis are the banks, the SPVs and their investors.

—  Recommendations: The Committee is invited to consider the recommendations at paragraphs: 37, 43, 52, 79 and especially the recommendation at paragraphs. 85 to 88.

PASSING ON THE INTEREST RATE CUTS

5.  The Committee has rightly been concerned to elicit a reason for banks failure to pass on the Bank of England interest rate cuts to borrowers and yet, do pass on the interest rate cuts to the savers[106]. The answer to the question is simple. The banks have passed the interest rate cuts to the savers because the banks have the power to set the interest rate for the savers. Conversely, the banks do not have the power to pass the interest rate cuts to the borrower.

6.  This is because, the banks have sold the mortgage contracts to the SPVs and it is the SPVs alone, that have the contractual power to determine the borrowers interest rates. Consequently, it is the SPVs that decide whether or not to pass on the interest rate cuts. It is the SPVs that have decided not to pass on the interest rate cuts.

7.  This fact is evidenced by the various and respective Prospectuses that the SPVs file at the UK Listing Authority. In general, the bank that originates the loans will make a True Sale[107] of the mortgages to the SPV which means the contractual power to set the borrower’s interest rate is vested in the SPV.

8.  Following the bank’s True Sale of the mortgages, the bank’s contractual relationship with the borrower is extinguished. The SPV, as assignee, becomes the party that is in privity of contract with the borrower. However, neither the bank nor the SPV inform the borrower of the SPV’s ownership of the mortgage contract.[108]

The SPV will remain concealed. The borrower is unlikely to discover the SPV’s ownership of their mortgage contract because, following the sale to the SPV, the bank and the SPV enter into a contract wherein, the bank agrees to administrate the mortgages on behalf of the SPV and in return, the SPV remunerates the bank for its administrative services.

Consequently, whilst the bank has extinguished all its right and title to the consumer’s mortgage contract, the bank’s connection to the consumer’s mortgage is through its administration agreement with the SPV only. Following these legal manoeuvres: (i) the consumer and the SPV are in privity of contract under the mortgages; (ii) the bank and the SPV are in privity of contract through their administration agreement; and (iii) the world will remain ignorant of these events because, the bank continues to service the loans as if nothing has happened.

9.  Therefore, the bank’s only interest in the loans following its True Sale of the mortgages is that of a mere administrator and servicer of the loans. It is the SPV that is the bank’s client from whom the bank earns its servicing fees and from whom it receives its instructions. Consequently, the bank’s loyalty is to SPV client only. The power to set the borrowers interest rates is a contractual power contained in the mortgage contract:a fortiori when the contract is sold to the SPV, the contractual power to set the borrowers interest rates is vested in the SPV and not the bank. Therein is the reason why the banks have not passed-on the interest rates cuts. It is simply because: they cannot. They must, in accordance with their administration agreement with the SPV, implement the interest rate policy of their client, the SPV.

10.  Evidence of these submissions is best demonstrated by example. In the case of Northern Rock, the SPV has given Northern Rock the authority to set the interest rates. However, Northern Rock has undertaken to set the interest rate at a level that not only covers Northern Rock’s administration costs, it is contractually obliged to set the rate at a level sufficient to support the entirety of all the administration costs, expenses and profits of each of the numerous entities involved in the securitisation structure[109]. This means that Northern Rock must set the interest rate at a level that will ensure the SPV suffers no revenue shortfall. In the event that Northern Rock fails to set the rate at a level sufficient to satisfy the SPVs required revenue, then the mortgage trustee may “notify the administrator that the standard variable rate and the other discretionary rates or margins for the mortgage loans should be increased the administrator will take all steps which are necessary|to effect such increases in those rates or margins.” [110] Consequently, Northern Rock may only exercise the interest rate pursuant to the SPV’s authority to do so under the terms of its administration agreement, and in any event must set the rate at levels to the satisfaction of its SPV client. In other words, Northern Rock does not have the autonomous power to set the rates independent of its SPV client. Accordingly, it is the SPV that controls the interest rate setting power.

11.  Whilst Northern Rock has been used as the example, the Treasury Committee is reminded that this circumstance is not unique to Northern Rock. It is standard to most SPVs. In conclusion, it is recommended that the Committee encompass within its inquiry consideration of the role of the SPV in the banking crisis and the relationship between the banks and the SPVs.

12.  Finally, if the Government is determined that the interest rate cuts are passed on to the borrowers, it must ask the SPVs.

13.  In conclusion, this means that the correct answer to the Committee’s question No. 170[111]: “.  .  .  Are the banks just pocketing a few bob for themselves here?”: the full and correct answer is—No, it is the SPVs that are pocketing a few bob for themselves.

OPENNESS AND HONESTY

14.  There are no bad debts on the banks books. And if there is any bad debt, the amount is de minimis. A primary purpose of a securitisation is: to remove the credit risk from the bank’s books. The bank, under a `true sale’ will sell all its rights and title in the mortgages to the SPV and the SPV will in return pay the bank cash for the mortgage assets. This plain truth has remained elusive because under the terms of the true sale contract, the bank and the SPVs have unlawfully agreed to keep the transaction concealed from the borrower and, from H.M. Land Registry. Thus giving the false appearance to the world that the banks still own the mortgages.”

Read the full Memorandum: CARMEL BUTLER-House of Commons – Treasury – Written Evidence

In the meantime, if you are able, please consider making a donation via the Buy Me a Coffee button in support of my work in exposing the Great British Mortgage Swindle and the other various scams that hold sway in this crazy realm. All the best to each and every reader, especially David R who has supported my efforts for a number of years now and a big thank you to those who have recently made donations.

Any reader who is seeking assistance in this matter is encouraged to get in touch via email to roguemale@thinkfree.org.uk

 

2

Globalism: the Remedy is You (Part 4)

As detailed in Part 3 of this series of articles, it is a fact that His Majesty’s Courts will not permit the remedy that each Litigant In Person (LIP) is entitled to under the Common and Constitutional Law of these lands of Britain.

Institutionalised Mortgage Fraud

In fact, as Deputy District Judge Oliver Nunn, presiding at Nottingham County Court, so clearly demonstrated on 17 November, 2023, the judges sit in a false administrative capacity to rubber stamp possession claims made by lying lawyers on behalf of the Too Big To Fail (TBTF) UK banks, who are guilty of an industrial scale institutionalised mortgage fraud.

These individuals deem to reign with an arrogance that clouds their ability to reason. It is an arrogance that also manifestly infests their parasitic overlords in the Rothschild-dominated financial system that is actively seeking a one world government of enslavement to fake debt and of credit control via social credit applications linked to Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDC).

However, as I have detailed in Part 3, it is a system of control that is built upwards from foundations that are riddled with fraud. That is why it is so vulnerable.

Limited Hangouts

Its vulnerabilities will NOT to attacked by collectivist movements – no political party will save anyone when the stage is owned by the controllers and any and all of the following entities and individuals are controlled opposition, tolerated only because they corral people into limited hangouts where nothing ever happens. That is their purpose and the reason why they exist. Each and everyone of them is adept when it comes to rhetoric but curiously devoid of practical suggestions as to how and what the individual can do to defeat the tyranny which is all around him.

None of the following, to my knowledge, ever go near the subject of TGBMS or espouse any kind of proven remedy: David Icke,  UK Column (Mike Robinson, Brian Gerrish) Sacha Stone, Russell Brand, Robin Tillbrook, GB News (Neil Oliver), Lawrence Fox, Richard Vobes, James Delingpole, Richie Allen, ‘Tommy Robinson’, Andrew Bridgen, Nigel Farage etc.

Why? Because they are, whether or not they know it, acting as agents for the controlled opposition in all its forms.

A controlled opposition is a protest movement that is actually being led by government agents. Nearly all governments in history have employed this technique to trick and subdue their adversaries. Notably Vladimir Lenin who said ””The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.” Source

If you think I am wrong to make this assertion, then ask yourself these questions,

  • What remedies are being put forward by these talking heads to enable individuals to take action and bring about the collapse of the financial tyranny?
  • How do they empower their viewers to take action?
  • Are they pumping out fear porn into an echo chamber of inaction?
  • How do they inspire people to not only fight back but also bring down the false systems of glo-baal control?
The response a limited hangout agent to the question of why they never suggest remedies to the fear porn they promulgate.

The fact is that we are, each and every one of us,  sojourners in realm that is inverted in every aspect. Systems of health, finance, state control, government, education, psychiatry, religion and justice operate in a mirror opposite to their stated intentionas.  When everything is thus inverted, it behoves the individual to do and engage in the opposite to what is being imposed on the collective.

Self-Empowerment.

The first step is to realise that all power lies in the charge of the individual free thinking sovereign being. You are the co-creator in this  elastic realm – you create your own reality, your own informed field, you are the master of your own domain. Do not accept the scripts that the collective are given to swallow.

Secondly, realise that you can and do affect the reality of this world: after all,

whether you believe you can or cannot do something, you will be correct.

The third step is to take action, using your knowledge as your sword of truth:

  • Initiate Michael O’Bernicia’s perfected equitable Common Law Lien process against the CEO of your fake lender.
  • Serve a Data Subject Access Request (DSAR)  on the CEO of whichever fake lender is falsely claiming they are the HIDC of your Deed and that a loan was made.
  • Join Next Steps For TGBMS Class Actions: If you have a registered UK mortgage, charge or standard security [or you’ve previously had one] that doesn’t comply with the statutory law of mortgages, you can subscribe to our mailing list and join the 1,000+ TGBMS Claimants by signing up at the links below:
  • Subscribe to the TGBMS Mailing List
  • Become a TGBMS Claimant

As stated,

“We are also asking every claimant who has provided evidence of mortgage and signature fraud to Operation Meadow and Signature 703 to do the same, since we are bringing together the evidence amassed in each action into a central database and standardizing a non-judicial remedy which will be available to every illegally registered UK mortgage holder at zero cost.”

That non-judicial remedy is the lien process.

Further,

“Every TGBMS Claimant will receive free document templates for my long established Common Law Lien process, which takes 90 days to perfect, when it becomes an ‘account receivable’ that is capable of being exchanged for money or monies worth.

 

“This process was sealed by the High Court in August 2010, when HHJ Kaye QC described the lien I served on former Bank of Scotland CEO, James Crosby, as perhaps the most powerful document he had ever had in evidence before him because it required no judicial authority to be legally enforceable under Common Law.

 

“It must also be stressed that liens are treated in law as if they are equitable charges, which are capable of registration as legal charges against the personal property of the Lien Debtors, until such time that the losses they caused the Lien Creditors have been discharged in full.

What Michael is referencing here is the ultimate creation of a permanent credit facility wherein any and all wrongdoings against you, as demonstrated by the lien process, will be have a remedy, under Universal Community Trust and through its ever-closer financial system.

It is the art of transforming lies and fraud into freedom from financial control or, to put it plainly,

turning shit into gold

You can choose to believe this or not but the fact is the lien process is having a massive impact,

Hence, the panic we have seen recently in the City of London, as those who have profited from the losses incurred by Britain’s void mortgagors desperately attempt in vain to avert the serious consequences of a myriad of financial wrongdoings.”  The Bernician

Fourth, in the event you have had a gutful of the tyranny and plunder, look into the established natural law jurisdiction that is Universal Community Trust, which was created to protect the rights of the individual (not the collective) and join like-minded people who also take action instead of moaning about the shit coming down the pipeline that they heard about on UK Column.

As I posited at the start of this article, it is You, namely, the individual soul that is inside the biological meat-suit (that the false religion of Statism deceptively and incessantly programmes you to believe is the real you), that is the antidote to all the tyranny and madness that is afoot right now.

Don’t swallow the collective scripts, get out there, take action, engage your pen as your sword and make your non-consent loud and clear. Far from making you a target, taking action backed by the truth will empower you.

There is truly nothing to fear other than fear itself. As an immortal being, nothing can harm you.

Realise you are in the fight of your life and a battle against the Globalists who would enslave you and your progeny, as declared by the head-puppet of the WEF, Klaus Schwab.

Know that the only way to counteract the lies and deceptions is to speak the truth and refuse to back down.

If you are in Court, don’t hold back – if the original mortgage deed cannot be provided then there is no claim against you. Arm yourself with the Lien’s factual discoveries – no evidence of a loan, no valid contract, the deed is a fraud on its face, only an officer of the bank can provide a witness statement testifying to any loan or debt being existent, rendering the legal representations of the likes of TLT and Ascent an outright lie and threaten the paraglegals who signed it with perjury (which is exactly what they are engaging in).

Share this article with any one who is struggling to pay their fraudulent mortgage demands and bring it to the attention of those whose wealth accumulation is such that they falsely believe they are beyond the reach of the globalist financiers.

Finally, even in the face of tyranny, be honourable but take no nonsense and, thereby, stride into your power as a co-creator of your own reality.

In the meantime, if you are able, please consider making a donation via the Buy Me a Coffee button in support of my work in exposing the Great British Mortgage Swindle and the other various scams that hold sway in this crazy realm. All the best to each and every reader, especially David R who has supported my efforts for a number of years now and a big thank you to those who have recently made donations.

Any reader who is seeking assistance in this matter is encouraged to get in touch via email to roguemale@thinkfree.org.uk

4

No Deed – No Possession Claim (Pt 3)

In Part Two of this series on how International Globalist World Banking interests have purloined your Deed of Mortgage and are holding the valuable security in one of a number of Depository Trust vaults, I explained how, under Common and Constiutional Law, any possession claim made by your fake lender against your home is fraudulent.

In Part 4,  I will posit exactly what the remedy is. Having documented the complicity of His Majesty’s Courts in the world-wide swindle, the keen reader will not be surprised to read that it is a powerful extra-judicial equitable remedy. In other words, it hits the lying lawyers and their masters hard and there is nothing they can do about it.

Before I come on to that, let’s dig deeper into the facts of the dematerialised mortgage deed, using the insights of David Roger Webb’s book, “The Great Taking” and the documentary “All the Plenary’s Men”, both of which explain how a coterie of elite financiers, heavily controlled by the House of Rothschild have claimed immunity from prosecution for their crimes.

To re-emphasise the point: the void mortgage deed you were tricked into autographing is no longer in the possession of the phony lender. It has been bundled up and sold on for profit and the physical deed is languishing in some vault of an international clearing house, like the Depository Trust Company or EuroClear.

The Depository Trust Company – DTC – is one of a clutch of similar entities by which the WEF backers claim ownership of any and all securities, debentures, derivatives, all bills of exchange, bonds etc, including your mortgage. They have hoovered up the mortgage deeds in the millions and they are, presumably, holding them in their secure vaults, with the result that the phoney UK lenders, like Nat West Plc, are NOT the Holder(s)-In-Due-Course of the instrument.

That, in and of itself, renders any and all mortgage possession claims a fraud on you and on the court.

These elite financiers effectively want it all, lock, stock and barrel and that is why their henchman, Klaus Schwab constantly pushes the mantra, “You vill own nothing and you vill be happy.”

“Yes, Lord Rothschild, ve vill take it all at ze stroke of a pen. Ze goyim vill be too stupid to vork it out.” “So, all ze paper assets will be held by us and no-one vill know vhere zey have gone? Genius. Let’s get Schwab to twist ze dagger.”

Making It Up As they Go Along

As we know, it is a certain group who deem themselves to be above the law and beyond criticism. They are easily identified for they are the Zionist controllers of the world’s financial structure, the lapdog media, the TV companies, the publishing houses, the film companies, the oil companies, Big Pharma, the governments of the world and, as demonstrated by any and all County Court hearings, the judiciary.  The one ring to control it all.

This ‘Protected Class’ –  and JP Morgan are key players in the setting up of this structure of supposed immunity from prosecution, whereby property rights are separated by this notion of ‘entitlement’. Legal ownership is with the entity that holds the security as collateral: i.e the Holder-in-Due-Course of the Mortgage ‘Note’.

“An imperative has been created that certain secured creditors must be given legally certain claims to client assets, globally, without exception, with the further assurance of near instantaneous cross-border mobility of legal control of such collateral.”

 

“The ‘Hague Convention on the Law Applicable to Certain Rights in Respect of Securities Held with an Intermediary’ was drafted in 2002 and signed in 2006. It is an international multilateral treaty intended to remove, globally, legal uncertainties for cross-border transactions.

 

“The Convention introduced a newly invented conflict of laws rule to be applied to security transactions, especially collateral transactions, namely the ‘Place of the Relevant Intermediary Approach’ (or PRIMA). This was designed to avoid problematic national law, which might allow owners to recover their assets taken by a creditor as collateral, by setting the place of law in the account agreements with intermediaries.”

 

“The objective of Legal Certainty for creditors was to be pursued by other means, /where they could not easily change problematic local law in which investors had property rights to securities, they structured around it. This is what lawyers, investment banks, and , apparently, government officials are paid to do.”  David Webb, ‘The Great Taking’.

And, there we have it: the judges who preside at all county court hearings are attempting to crow bar in foreign ‘legislation’ or, what might be termed, global governance at the expense of British Law. A clearer example of treachery would be hard to imagine. In other words, those judges are traitors, just like the current coterie of Parliamentarians.

The excellent documentary, All the Plenary’s Men, details how, in 2012, the then chancellor of the Exchequeur, George Osborne, Adair Turner of the FCA and Mervyn King of the Bank of England, stepped in with a memorandum to exculpate a group of criminals operating under the aegis of HSBC, one of the Too-Big-To-Fail banking conglomerate. The US Department of Justice’s had all the evidence required to prosecute these indviduals. George Osborne wrote a letter to Ben Bernanke, head of the Federal Reserve at the time to claim that the criminals involved were above the law and under the jurisdiction of the elite banking club they belonged to.

George Osborne to Ben Bernanke, claiming that the criminals in HSBC belong to a superior jurisdiction and that grants them immunity from prosecution. “..[it is] for you, and your partners in other departments and agencies, to decide how best to supervise, regulate and enforce compliance within your jurisdiction… And Adair Turner, Mervyn King and I are together committed to ensuring that UK financial institutions are fully compliant with global standards and rules.”
However, and this is the crucial point, Fraud Vitiates All and when you know this the inescapable conclusion is that the whole edifice of this world-wide swindle is underpinned by fraud.

The Mortgage Deed is the security you were duped into granting the fake lender when you were not the owner of the house. And, as has been the case down the centuries, you are lawfully entitled to have it returned when the ‘mortgage’ has been settled.

In effect, all these traitorous judges are falsely stating the opposite.

The bank is not the holder in due course of the note because it’s has been sold on at profit  (securitised) and is literally being held in a vault at one of the clearing houses and photocopies and electronic are acceptable in the world of the traitor and bootlicker. It has sold on all its rights to possession of your home and is merely acting as a collection agent for the investors.

That is why no mortgagee can ever produce it.  All they have is dog-eared photo copies and scanned versions of what, remember, is essentially a worthless piece of paper, fraudulently procured for the bank by a weasel conveyancing solicitor.

Virtual Reality is a Nonsense

It is, of course, utter codswallop – especially when you consider that the deeds themselves are fraudulent and that none of the statutory regulations, like Section 2 of the Law of Property Act, 1989 are not complied with.

In this world of virtual compliance, of Central Bank Digital currencies (CBDC), all is up for grabs. The Dematerialisation of mortgage deeds and other securities is what will also happen to your moneys in the bank, should you do nothing about it.

Even the principles of contract law are subsumed in this AI world of utter fakery:

No contract? That’s fine – the only rights we need to concern ourselves with are those of the investors in the securitisation programmes and our global masters, as fronted by the WEF and its Draconian diktats.

The claims to legal immunity are, of course, as void under Common Sense as they are under British Law.

 As such, it is a chimera – or, less prosaically, the world’s biggest dung heap. The hidden controllers are sitting atop a mountain of fraud and it’s going to collapse underneath them.

Note this list of The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC), which “operates two Central Clearing Parties (CCP) and is

“The parent company of various operating subsidiaries, including The Depository Trust Company (DTC), National Securities Clearing Corporation (NSCC), Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (FICC), DTCC ITP LLC (ITP), DTCC Deriv/SERV LLC; Deriv/SEV), DTCC Solutions LLC (Solutions (US), DTCC Solutions (UK), Business Entity Data B.V. (BED); Collectively, the “Company” or “Companies””

Just to be clear: no-one is immune from these risible attempts at global control. n the event I have any ‘high end’ readers who have investments in securitisation packages, it is important to note that when the inevitable happens and the dung heap collapses,  YOU will lose it all. David Webb makes it plain,

“In the collapse of the clearing subsidiaries of DTCC, it is the secured creditors who take the assets of the entitlement holders. This is where it is going. It is designed to happen suddenly, and on a vast scale.” p41.

 

It was the public gold that the Federal Reserve stole in 1933, “In this go round it is securities of all kinds, globally, which have been set-up as the collateral backing underpinning the derivatives complex.” p50

This screenshot is from All the Plenary’s Men and illustrates starkly the false protections claimed by the international banksters,

We and only we can put a stop to this.

Part 4 of this series will offer the remedy.

In the meantime, if you are able, please consider making a donation via the Buy Me a Coffee button in support of my work in exposing the Great British Mortgage Swindle and the other various scams that hold sway in this crazy realm. All the best to each and every reader, especially David R who has supported my efforts for a number of years now and a big thank you to those who have recently made donations.

Further viewing:

“The question at bar is why the U.S. Department of Justice has failed to prosecute any too-big-to-fail banks or—more importantly—their bankers, even for admitted crimes.
It’s a crucial question, because after eight straight years of unremitting prosecutorial failure, it looks very much as if a select group of top banks can, in fact, do no wrong. If that’s the case, then our constitutional republic isn’t merely in trouble. It’s dead.” All the Plenary’s Men

1

BRITISH COURTS UNDER FOREIGN CONTROL (Pt 2)

According to Common and Constitutional Law, the County Courts, which preside over mortgage possession hearings to rubber-stamp the fraudulent possession claims that the lying firms of solicitors like TLT and Ascent Debt Collection bring on behalf of their masters, have no jurisdiction.

Halsbury’s on Administrative Law 20-11: states it thus,

The law is absolutely clear on this subject. There is no authority for administrative courts in this country and no act can be passed to legitimise them.”

In Part One, I wrote about the farcical nature of Deputy District Judge Oliver Nunn‘s fallacious attempt to hold a Hearing when one of the parties could not hear.

In his refusal to listen to reason, Oliver Nunn (above), the man acting as deputy district judge, took the foolish decision to

“plough on regardless with the inevitable consequence (of which he had been warned) that he illogically and purportedly ‘decided’ that photocopies and electronic scans of the incurably fraudulent Mortgage Deed were perfectly acceptable, even when fraud is being alleged as is the case here.” Source

It is important to remember that Steve, the alleged defendant, has material evidence of the fraud that the claimant Nat West Plc is relying upon in order to steal his home.

In so doing, its claim is reliant only on photocopies and electronic scans as it is not the Holder-In-Due-Course of the original deed of mortgage.

This valuable instrument is a key component in the Great British Mortgage Swindle. The fact that the alleged lender, despite repeated request, will not provide it is damning on all parties, including the court and the judge, as the lawful presumption must be that it is not in its possession.

For the possession claim not to be dismissed on the basis the claimant cannot provide this key proof of claim is contrary to Common and Constitutional Law, as well as common sense. As Steve stated for and on the record,

Would a photocopy of a V5 (Vehicle ownership doc, used in UK) be acceptable as proof of ownership?

Oliver Nunn, spluttered that this was not the same thing and not relevant in this matter.

This is, of course, nonsense but, of equal significance, is the fact that by denying Steve his remedies under the laws of these lands and imposing a fairy tale realm of financial cartel jurisdiction, where the claimant does not have to provide the actual documents to substantiate its claim, Oliver Nunn, whether he knows it or not, is a man, acting as a judge, in an unlawful administrative court, who is complicit in imposing foreign beneficial interests over British jurisprudence. That makes him a traitor.

Mind you, I have been asserting this point for some time, so let’s move onto how the bogus claim against Steve fits into the Globalist Game of Bolshevik Totalitarian control.

Let us first remind ourselves of the 750 year old Observance of due Process of Law 1368, section 3 which states:

“None shall be put to answer without due Process of Law. At the Request of the Commons by their Petitions put forth in this Parliament, to eschew the Mischiefs and Damages done to divers of his Commons by false Accusers, which oftentimes have made their Accusations more for Revenge and singular Benefit, than for the Profit of the King, or of his People, which accused Persons, some have been taken, and sometime caused to come before the King’s Council by Writ, and otherwise upon grievous Pain against the Law: It is assented and accorded, for the good Governance of the Commons, that no Man be put to answer without Presentment before Justices, or Matter of Record, or by due Process and Writ original, according to the old Law of the Land: And if any Thing from henceforth be done to the contrary, it shall be void in the Law, and holden for Error.”

The clause stating

” no Man be put to answer without Presentment before Justices, or Matter of Record, or by due Process and Writ original, according to the old Law of the Land: And if any Thing from henceforth be done to the contrary, it shall be void in the Law, and holden for Error”

stands to this day as the time immemorial lawful remedy which should, on its own, be sufficient to apply the fatal blow to the entire racket that is TGBMS.

In the words of Klaus Schwab, the unelected dictatorial Rothschild mouthpiece of the World Economic Forum,

“You vill own nothing and you will be happy,” .

But how could this possibly come about?

The following is taken from a book by David Rogers Webb, “The Great Taking”, a copy of which can be downloaded at the foot of this article.

If we go back some 20+ years we will recall the time of ‘credit expansion’ and how the notorious sub-prime mortgage swindle held out a bait and switch whereby the mortgagor would be tempted into the criminal mortgage ‘deal’ by an offer of a fake loan above the market value of the property purchase, with the excess offered to the duped customer, as ‘cash-back’.

This had a purpose that was world-wide in its intent and its scope:

“How was debt expanded while credit conditions were deteriorating? It was necessary to create a massive, audacious illusion: that was no risk, specifically that there need be no concern about the ability of borrowers to repay financial obligations. The Scheme worked so well that banks discontinued their risk underwriting functions, wile offering mortgages for more than the purchase price of a home […]

“

 

The entire global financial system was moved aggressively to origination and securitisation of loans into Asset-Backed Securities (ABS), and to filling balance sheets with these securities. With the illusion of risk free return, demand for these ABS was so high that they were sold many times over on a synthetic basis, i.e. , as derivative instruments.

 

“Invented in the 1990s, ABS were created by forming a pool of financial obligations (e.g, mortgages, credit card receivables, boat loans) and then carving up the pool into a series of tranches with ascending risk ratings. The idea was that any defaults would be absorbed by the lowest-rated tranches. This would allow the highest tranche to be rated AAA.”

 

“… I eventually uncovered that ownership rights to securities, which had been personal property for four centuries, had somehow been subverted. This was born out in the bankruptcies of Lehman Brothers and MF Global.”

Webb states that a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission SEC report

“recommended changing from processing physical stock certificates to ‘book-entry’ transfers of ownership via computerised entries in a trust company that would hold the underlying certificates ‘immobilised’. p41

Now you see it, now you don’t…

What we are looking at here, both in Steve’s case and on a world-wide level, is the dematerialisation of paper assets, which are now, like Rapunzel, locked away in a Bolshevik Tower of financial control.

That is why the judge did not like the term Holder-in-Due-Course. The original security is irredeemable, according to the dematerialisation of paper securities into the vaults of such entities as DTC and the Bank of International Settlements.

The bank, a subsidiary of the DTC etc, is attempting to apply legal immunities granted to the Too Big To Fail international cartel at the expense of the British people’s Common and Criminal Law protections.



“Euroclear is one of two European International Central Security Depositories (ICSD), the other being Clearstream. The Brussels office of Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York (Morgan Guaranty) founded the Euroclear System in December, 1968. Morgan Guaranty began operating as JP Morgan in 1988.”

 

A Euroclear memorandum sent by Diego Devos, the Deputy General Counsel for said company, regarding ‘European Legal Harmonisation’ recommended,

 

“Removal or modification of requirements that do not recognise the multi-layer holding structure that is the norm in cross-border activity, including,

 

Recognition in the EU of the pooled holding of registered assets through a nominee structure(and the different nature of legal and beneficial ownership) in order to keep registered securities on a fungible basis at local level and protection of the rights of the nominee;

 

Elimination or modification of requirements that directly or effectively require the maintenance of individual records or accounts per beneficial owner”

However, all that is dependent, according to DRW, on there being “no resistance” and he is right in his assertion that a small number of individuals resisting the tyranny will be all that it takes to bring about its inevitable collapse, as the entire dungheap is built on fraudulent financial securities.

For those with the eyes to see and ears to hear, resistance to any and all globalist diktats is rising, in all its forms, every day. The inevitable consequence of which is that when – not if –  sufficient numbers resist the theft of their homes and demand an end to the unlawful courts of administration, the entire racket will collapse.

What we can individually do about this will be the subject of Part 4 of this series.

In the meantime, if you are able, please consider making a donation via the Buy Me a Coffee button in support of my work in exposing the Great British Mortgage Swindle and the other various scams that hold sway in this crazy realm. All the best to each and every reader, especially David R who has supported my efforts for a number of years now.

Book downoad of The Great Taking by David Webb

4

Your Deed of Mortgage is in a World Bank (Foreign) Vault

And No-Body is actually holding it.

Part One: How the Too Big To Fail (TBTF) Financial Institutions Have Hoovered Up Your Mortgage Deed.

For some 10 years now, I have been stating this: a Possession Hearing at the County Court is a Shit Show that always attempts to obfuscate the fact the purported lender is no longer in possession of the valuable security known as the Deed of Mortgage.

The one I attended last Friday, 17th November, 2023 was no exception. I’m not going to go into the details of what, in the final instance, did NOT happen but I will draw the reader’s attention to a number of salient facts:

1. The alleged defendant, Steve, is deaf, as anyone who knows him will confirm.

2. It is a fact that a ‘hearing’ in which one of the parties cannot hear is a nullity by definition.

3. Steve had an application in for an order of full disclosure of the documents the claimant, Nat West PLC, is relying upon – among them being, a legal contract/agreement for a mortgage that satisfies Section 2 of the 1989 Law of Property Act, the accounting of the purported loan (showing where it originated and where it went), a valid Power of Attorney that conforms with the Powers of Attorney Act, 1971.

4. The order for disclosure also requested that the bank provide the original Deed of Mortgage, with the required wet ink signatures thereon.

The shit show began with the court being moved to another building, ‘The Family Court’ at Nottingham, which Steve had not been notified of.

The ‘security’, peopled by dullard operatives, was absurd in its rigmarole.

It was the 4th hearing, the others each being adjourned because Steve cannot hear what is being said. The presiding judge outrageously questioned whether Steve is really deaf and suggested the hearing loop was working fine as 3 people (with full hearing abilities) had tested it.

When Steve told the judge he could not hear him, District Judge Nunn instructed that the desk be brought a couple of yards closer to his. 

Throughout the hearing, Steve kept informing the court that he could barely hear and that 90% of what the Judge was stating was inaudible. Nunn insisted that he be allowed to plough on and that ‘we will do our best.’

He did indeed plough on regardless with the inevitable consequence (of which he had been warned) that he illogically and purportedly ‘decided’ that photocopies and electronic scans of the incurably fraudulent Mortgage Deed were perfectly acceptable, even when fraud is being alleged as is the case here.

His decision to refuse the application is a gross failure to apply the law on his part. This is why:

In Bracegirdle v Oxley and Canley [1947] KB349, Lord Bingham expressed: “it is obviously perverse and an error of law to make a finding of fact for which there is no evidential foundation.”

It is also worth noting that Judge Nunn was most anxious that the term, ‘Holder-In-Due Course’ be not used. Why was the DJ so allergic to the expression, Holder-In-Due Course?

I’ll tell you why. Judge Nunn knows that the Note has been securitised, bought and sold many times over and that the original, albeit fraudulent deed, can never be materialised as it is held in a vault at one of the world’s clearing houses, as controlled by the psychotic financiers who slop around like Gollum in the dimly-lit corridors of the one ring that controls all.

Consequently, it stands to reason that he is also aware that Nat West PLC is NOT the Holder-in-Due-Course of the deed and, therefore, has no standing whatsoever to begin a possession claim. This also pulls their legal representatives/debt collection agency, ASCENT of Manchester into the fraud. Said entity has also refused to provide the data requested in a DSAR, sent over a month ago.

In all seriousness, I cannot call the hour and a half I spent in the phoney court room a ‘hearing’ in any real sense – for how can a hearing take place if one party cannot hear? It was, therefore, an absurdity and his order must be set aside on that ground alone. After all, how can Steve consent to an order that he has not heard and thus been unable to refuse?

Then, of course, we had Judge Nunn blathering on about the familiar Costs threat – effectively saying that the longer this goes on and the more Steve challenges their bullshit, the more he will rack up in costs against him, thereby depleting the house of its equity. In other words, said judge was asserting defeat would be inevitable and Steve should back down now.

So, why did the judge go to such extremes of effort to cover up the salient issue of who is the holder in due course of the mortgage deed and deny the order for disclosure?

The simple answer is that he is a traitor who is in service to another master and not the British Public.

Who owns him? Whilst that question is between him and his maker, we can certainly establish that the mortgage deed is ‘owned’ by one of the Clearing Houses that takes deposit of them in its vaults, along with a plethora of other securities, notes, bills, derivatives and other associated instruments of magic.

How this came about will be shown in Part 2 of the article.

In the meantime, if you are able, please consider making a donation via the Buy Me a Coffee button in support of my work in exposing the Great British Mortgage Swindle and the other various scams that hold sway in this crazy realm. All the best to each and every reader, especially David R who has supported my efforts for a number of years now.

3

Why Hasn’t Bill Gates Been Assassinated?

Indeed, will any of the Elite Controllers be assassinated?

When one considers the manifest world-wide genocide of the peoples of the world and the clear and persistent threat posed to Mankind by a list of Eugenics-enthused murderers, of which Bill Gates is the most visible and enthusiastic proponent, this is a question that may naturally arise.

Off the top of my head, and in no particular order, Lord Rothschild, Klaus Schwab, George Soros, the head of WHO, Bill Gates, any and all of the underling poli-puppets like Sunak, Dan Andrews, Macron, Merkel, Hilary Clinton and any other liar like the stooge Noah Harari might reasonably be deemed legitimate targets for assassination on the basis of the manifest threats they pose to the lives of millions across this realm.

Do any of these individuals even fear assassination attempts?

Probably not from the people – after all , is the threat not more likely to come from their dark masters should they step out of line?

Could it be that assassinations are  carried out exclusively by the Deep State, usually against figures who may have ‘gone rogue’ or, by bankers whose deaths are invariably of a ritualistic type? After all the ‘Banker Jumps to his death’ is a common enough headline:


Is it testimony to the fact that, contrary to how the media presents them, the people are not dangerous and are, essentially, peace-oriented in nature?

How often do we find that so-called suicide bombers, gun or knife-toting ‘terrorists’ turn out to be patsies who have been duped into acting out roles on behalf of the ‘Security Services’?

Everything would point to the fact that it is those who seek control over others who are attracted to positions of authority – the ‘Crown’, Organised Religions, the Judiciary, Bankers, Lawyers, Politicians, Police ‘Constables’, Teachers, Social Services, the Mass Media Propagandists, Doctors, Nurses, Pharmacists . How darkly ironic then that those of the most pathological bent infest the higher levels of the pyramid of control.

There are numerous studies which point to the tendencies of psychopaths to seek out roles in which they get to sit atop the various dungheaps of ‘office’ and exert control over huge swathes of the populace, of which some 80% are easily hypnotised by the propaganda of the captured state as the events of the last three and a half years so clearly demonstrate. Indeed, the global finance racket is riddled with them.

In the light of which, it’s sensible to conclude that assassinations of dangerous individuals at the head of certain agencies of globalist terrorism are exclusively carried out by the military arm of the state and/or secret alphabet agencies.

All of which adds further credence to the view that there are no ‘lone wolves’ behind the false flag terrorist attacks as perpetrated by the CIA, MI6 and other state perpetrators of the psy-ops.

It’s a huge pantomime of the macabre and only around 20% will see through the propaganda/mind control.

Don’t expect any super hero to rise up either – that suggestion, as programmed via the media’s Marvel and Co’s comic-book heroes is merely the stuff of children’s stories: the only hero in your life is yourself.

The pantomime that is played out on the global stage is but a dramatic performance, in which all the actors are following their scripts, often to the point of utter absurdity. 

After all, would it not be relatively easy for Putin to have the members of the ‘International Psychopathy Club’ assassinated in the interests of Mankind’s safety if he was a genuine maverick who wanted to free the world of tyranny?

No: the Bread and Circus parade must continue in its crafting of the staged reality in which divide and rule has always been the aim of the game and it never stops, which is why this clickbait nonsense amounts to a desperate attempt at providing solace for those who fall, time-after-time, for the false hero narrative:

If you’d like to show your appreciation of this and my other posts, then perhaps you could consider buying me a coffee at the link. Thank you to all my kind readers, especially David R for his wonderful support.

1

The Fraud of TLT – the lawyers who lie for the banks

Fraud, contrary to what an ill-educated cop or lawyer might claim, is criminal, especially when it comes to the Great British Mortgage Swindle.

As we all know, to be a liar it is essential that you have a good memory, as demonstrated by the endless lies of those who would claim to rule the world. Lying on behalf of the fraudulent banks takes a special kind of liar and where better to find such than in a legal firm?

The directors of the legal firm TLT, having been informed of the facts, are now culpable for every fraudulent possession claim they make on behalf of their clients, the UK Mortgage providers.

The following missive is reproduced courtesy of Sean Goddard who is facing a fraudulent possession claim by the Co-operative Bank and its CEO, Nick Slape. It is addressed to the Managing Directors of TLT, whose mugshots can be viewed below.

Of TLT, Wikipedia states,

TLT LLP is a UK law firm headquartered in Bristol. It was named Law Firm of the Year at The Lawyer Awards 2021. Based on its revenue, TLT was among the top 50 law firms in the UK in 2020, according to The Lawyer. Its revenue was £110m in 2020–21; this represents an increase of 11% on 2019–20 (£98.8m) and a 25% rise on the 2018–19 figure (£87.6m).The firm employs over 1,000 staff. The firm has offices in London and Manchester, Glasgow, Edinburgh and a Northern Ireland subsidiary in Belfast. Overseas, the firm operates an office in Piraeus, Greece. It also has strategic partnerships with European firms GSJ advocaten in Belgium and Holla in the Netherlands to deliver international cross border services for clients.

History

TLT was created in 2000, following the merger of two Bristol based law firms, Lawrence Tucketts and Trumps. Trumps was formed in the 1950s and Lawrence Tucketts in 1985. The earliest strands of both firms go back to the 1800s.

In 2005, TLT acquired niche financial services practice Lawrence Jones and expanded into London. In 2007, TLT acquired commercial law firm Constant & Constant, which doubled the firm’s London presence. In 2010 TLT moved to new offices in the City of London.

Eight of the firm’s practice areas are top ranked by Chambers UK and 80 of TLT’s lawyers are ranked as leaders in their field by the legal guide. Wikipedia

Although a void possession claim has been issued by the County Court, Sean continues to resist the fraud that is TGBMS. Remarkably, he has managed to uncover the material evidence that demonstrates beyond all doubt that the Co-op Bank is NOT the Holder in Due Course (HIDC) of the mortgage (note) which means its possession claim is a fraud upon the court as well as upon Sean.

It also means that in the event TLT and its client do not back down, those managing directors will be leaving themselves wide open to Private Criminal Prosecutions (PCP) and to Common Law Liens being perfected against their properties.

I am returning this pile of clap-trap to you as there is nothing in this which is anything approaching the truth, ESPECIALLY the rubbish you and others in TLT wrote. All relevant evidence has been extracted, and is being compiled with a view to being laid before a magistrate with a view to seeking private criminal prosecutions against all involved in the matter. If all goes well, arrest warrants should be issued, and whether or not prosecution is successful, being arrested would mean that names of those arrested could be made public. No doubt that would, at best, harm or, at worst, destroy the careers of those implicated. It could also bring the reputation of their employer into question.

 

The only way TLT could win any such cases is by lying, and it is now obvious that TLT have a standard (abuse of process) practice in order to win cases. Your collusion with the corrupt, and inept judiciary to enact fraud has, so far allowed you to get away with your crimes.

I am happy to publicly call you and others you “work” with liars (I have named you on social media quite a few times now) so that anyone who ends up on the receiving end of your criminal practices will be aware of them, and can deal with them appropriately.

 

It is patently obvious that no one in the matter understands the complexities of the fraud perpetrated by your client. However, there are those in the “real world” who do, and they are now part of an active investigation involving the SFO, who have reached out to me via a third party and requested I provide evidence of your client’s (and TLT’s) activities.

 

I have also received a communication from one “Avon Finance No.1” stating that they are now the owners of my mortgage and that any payments I make must be to them. In this communication, they state they bought the mortgage in 2022 from a company called “Isle of Wight Homeloans” as part of a “re-financing deal” due to, it would appear, your client failing to pass on funds to the investors (we know the Co-op bank has ripped off “bond” holders, so there is no reason to doubt they wouldn’t do likewise to “investors”).

 

Of additional information, it would appear that your client has lost FCA authorisation to administer regulated mortgages due to a technical error in the documentation for the initial sales in 2015, yet the FCA and your client continue to act as if nothing has happened, probably because neither is aware of the fact.

 

Further, GMAC related information has been obtained and, when combined, and referenced with Land Registry information appears to point to a large number of your clients’ mortgages having not been transferred correctly providing a good many of their customers with a valid and solid defence (should their attention be brought to the matter and how to apply the information).

 

If your client had simply been open and honest from the start, they would not now be facing the inevitable, and neither would you and TLT.

 

Like TLT, your client believed that no one would ever find out what they had been up to, and how, but being total strangers to anything resembling the truth, they pushed a number of their customers to the point where they have pooled research resources and now are fighting back with the sole aim of causing your client maximum financial damage, and it looks like “we” are on the verge of doing just that. To paraphrase Ronald Reagan, “They counted on customers to be passive, they counted wrong”. The problem being that they think they are clever, they are most definitely NOT and may be viewed as, essentially, intellectual midgets.

 

Look at what Bank of Scotland were up to with their GRG unit. “We” have uncovered information that appears to indicate your client was engaged in similar activities. It seems your client was seeking possession orders using “manufactured” reasons (such as arrears created by excessive charges, random penalties, infractions of mortgage conditions etc). A third part company (owned by the then directors, or associates thereof) purchased these properties at knock-down price, then selling, either directly (at a loss) to other companies owned by their then directors who subsequently sold these properties for personal gain or simply selling them on the open market. The initial purchasing company continually reported a loss, and your client, probably then pursued the property owners for the fraudulently manufactured short-fall.

 

As the above would be classed as blatant fraud, there is no timescale on the ability for victims to take action against your client, again, should they be made aware of this information.

 

I might suggest that those involved should be working as many hours as possible to amass a cash buffer, because when all this is made public, it won’t end well, and criminal defence lawyers don’t come cheap, especially when the evidence is incontrovertible.

The facts are plain. What will TLT do now? After all, any one with a brain cell would cease and desist at this point and, of course, TLT, under the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) and those agents who represent TLT in court are duty bound to inform the court of these facts, regardless of how damaging they are to CEO Nick Slape and his predecessor, Andrew Bester of the Co-Op Bank.

Watch this space.

As ever, my gratitude goes out to David R for his relentless support of Rogue Male. Should any reader like to contribute to the running of the site, then please ‘Buy me a coffee’ via the button. Thank you.

4

New Zealand Gov Threatens to ‘Take Down’ Rogue Male Site

Yes, you read that correctly. On 25th August, 2023, the “Internal Affairs Dept” of the NZ Gov issued a ‘take down’ notice to the hosting platform for this site, the specifics of which can be viewed below.

The referenced article is a short piece linking to a documentary about the staged Christchurch shooting of 2019.

Making a Mountain out of a Mole Hill.

Given the very modest traffic the piece has gathered since its publication on 22 February, 2022, I am inclined to state it is much ado about nothing. The proverbial storm in a teacup. As such, I will, for the sake of preserving the site, remove it from public view within the next 24 hours.

NB: In no way should this be taken by any and all interested parties that I accept the claim or that NZ Gov’s “Internal Affairs” Department has any jurisdiction over my creative output – it does not. Therefore, it has now been made private. In any event, should any reader have had their interest piqued, the referenced documentary is out there and can be easily found at the Anarcho Film Productions and Odyssey sites.

It is, of course, a wonderful irony that this action may only serve to garner more publicity for the film. By drawing attention to it, the censorship arm of the NZ gov has unwittingly shot itself in the foot and probably made more people interested in it as a consequence. Shine light upon the darkness and it vanishes.

A Classic Case of Inversion.

It also reveals that a somewhat paranoid and desperate mindset exists within the ‘Ministry for Truth” of the NZ diktat (just as exists within all governments who attempt to cover up the truth in order to prop up their false narratives).

If you’re a liar, you’d better have a good memory.

I state this on the simple basis that the truth does not need to be defended. The converse to which is that falsehoods take an enormous amount of defending, as can be plainly seen in this instance.

When you are defending a false narrative, the web of lies inevitably becomes more tangled and prone to collapse.

When individuals operating in government go to such great lengths to suppress the truth by way of omission and misrepresentation then it is blatant that they simultaneously attempt to defend whatever lie they are promulgating.

“Schedule A” of the notice states,

“The blog contains a link to Part 1 of a documentary film which includes the entirety of the livestream footage from the 15 March 2019 Christchurch Mosque attacks.

 The content has been deemed as objectionable (illegal) in New Zealand in accordance with OFLC decision 2200062 “

For the avoidance of doubt: the only “objectionable” behaviour is that of the NZ gov which has consistently lied to its people and imposed draconian measures against them over the last three and a half years of the Divoc 91 psy-op.

People in Glass Houses Shouldn’t Throw Stones.



Notice the risible attempt to conflate ‘objectionable’ with ‘illegal’ – a misuse of grammar that renders it meaningless. Indeed, the language used throughout the notice is vague and subjective and the author evidently is of the false opinion that he has the critical thinking skills necessary for his role as a moral arbiter and censor.

1984 on Steroids

It goes on to claim that

“the content is likely to be injurious to the public good under Section 3, as the publication > Torture or the infliction of extreme violence or extreme cruelty” and,
“> Acts of torture, the infliction of serious physical harm, or act of significant cruelty
> Degrades or demeans any person.”

which is even more hilarious as the documentary reveals the footage to be fake in the extreme, meaning it is unlikely that anyone was hurt. It is that fact that the NZ gov wishes to cover up in order to continue its psychological fear operations against its populace.

Quite how the NZ gov can legitimately claim to be concerned about “degrading” or “demeaning” individuals after its criminal behaviour during the entirety of the Convid psy-op only proves the point that these entities are so lost in their vacuousness of soul that they falsely accuse others of doing that which they are engaged in themselves which is the same modus operandi that underpins the pathetic machinations of the UK Gov’s mouthpiece, the BBC and its figurehead of “disinformation”, Miss Marianna Spring.

Anarcho Film Productions Website

As ever, my gratitude goes out to David R for his relentless support of Rogue Male. Should any reader like to contribute to the running of the site, then please ‘Buy me a coffee’ via the button. Thank you.

1

What Price British Justice?

A Quagmire: the State of the British Judiciary

It is some 14 years since I stepped into Nottingham County Court to defend a fraudulent possession claim against my home of 16 years.

At that time, I was reasonably confident in the British Justice system. However, I no longer take that view.

Since that time to the present, I have made numerous appearances at all levels, civil and criminal, in the once highly regarded British justice system, now known as His Majesty’s Courts and Tribunal Services (HMCTS).

I have made appearances as a defendant: in an attempt to have me sent to prison for refusing to let court bailiffs steal my home, as Claimant in a High Court Claim against a negligent conveyancing solicitor, as a defendant in a jumped up charge of assault against 2 bumbling police constables, as a Claimant in the resulting successful Tort action against said PCs, as a defendant in a bogus hearing over an alleged motoring offence and, of course, as an assistant and observer at numerous hearings where I was helping out a number of people over mortgage fraud, fake trespass claims and even one where my ex partner was charged with assaulting a constable during the course of the state-sponsored criminal eviction of the Crawford family. Some of the hearings – at Nottingham and Huddersfield Magistrates’ Courts – have also involved periods of false imprisonment in the dungeons beneath these courts.

During that time I have witnessed numerous ‘expensively-educated’ sophist judges ignorantly pontificate on matters such as The Great British Mortgage Swindle, a multi-levelled fraud of which they know nothing or, as may sometimes be the case, these judges are set only on perpetuating the swindle and railroading all those who the solicitors falsely claim are “vexatious litigants”.

I have seen a modicum of fair behaviour from a minority of British judges, but more often I’ve borne witness to the ubiquitous usage of logical fallacies, bullying and the sort of strong-arm coercive tactics that bring the judiciary into disrepute.

First in Time, First in Line

Therefore, it is perhaps appropriate that I make comment on the state of the British judiciary following the Corona-Nation of the traitorous imposter Charles Saxe-Coburg Gotha which took place on the day after my latest visit to Nottingham’s County Court.

This overview of the state of ‘His Majesty’s Courts and Tribunal Service’ (HMCTS) is from my perspective as a man, indigenous to the Isles of Britain, whose ancestral origins in this part of the simulacrum, undoubtedly go back millennia before the arrival of King Charles’ ancestors and as someone who has direct experience of what passes for ‘justice’ across these lands.

The matter in which I was assisting on 5th May, 2023 is a fraudulent possession claim brought against the home of my good friend, ‘Steve’. I say it is fraudulent for a number of reasons, but largely because Steve has a notarised perfected equitable lien against Alison Rose, the CEO of Nat West Plc, the phony claimant.

The facts established therein are:

1. There is no valid and enforceable mortgage contract in existence.

2. All bookkeeping entries associated with the alleged loan are being concealed by Nat West Plc

3. There is no valid and enforceable mortgage deed or charge operating as a deed in existence.

4. The insurance policy on the alleged borrower’s note is being concealed by Nat West Plc.

5. The call reports for the period covering the alleged loan are being concealed by Nat West Plc

6. The deposit slip for the deposit of the alleged borrower’s note is being concealed by Nat West Plc

7. The order authorising the withdrawal of funds from the alleged borrower’s note deposit account is being concealed by Nat West Plc.

8. The account number from which the money came to fund the alleged loan is being concealed by
Nat West Plc.

9. Any and all existing allonges, front and back, affixed to the promissory note for endorsements, are being concealed by Nat West Plc.

Notwithstanding which, there is also the matter of the Data Subject Access Request (DSAR) which has TWICE been requested and ignored, bringing the alleged lender into dispute under which it has failed to prove it is the Holder-in-Due-Course (HIDC) of the alleged mortgage ‘note’.

These points are covered elsewhere on this site and the interested reader can find out more here –

1. Mortgage Explained in 600 words
2. How the Deed of Mortgage is a fraud on its face.
3. How every mortgage company is in breach of the legal requirement for a written agreement to be signed by all parties to the mortgage.
4. No Bank Loans Anything – the essential fraud at the heart of the financial system.

To return directly to what happened on Friday, 5th May, 2023.

NOTTINGHAM ‘JUSTICE’ CENTRE.

The hearing was scheduled for 15:25. When we arrived at c. 14:55, we had to go through the ‘security check’ pantomime. Whilst the table tennis-like metal detector bats have been in situ for over a decade, it is to be noted that the guards on the door that afternoon were Pakistani immigrants who speak only broken English and who are, consequently, incapable of engaging in any form of meaningful dialogue or, indeed, providing any useful information for a Litigant in Person (LIP).

Whilst the hearing was listed on the County Court’s schedule, it was, in fact due to be heard in a court room at the Magistrates’ Court (the Justice Centre) some five minutes walk away. This necessitated in us having to go through more of the security nonsense at the behest of another team of foreign ‘guards’, each of whom was as humourless and over-zealous as the previous one.

At the hearing, it soon became clear that the Defence and Counterclaim Steve had posted in a box at the Court, as formerly ‘instructed’ by the security guards, had not been received by the Court and the District Judge had not seen it. Until recently, Nottingham County Court had a Public Counter at which documents could be filed, affidavits witnessed and questions asked. This service has now been reduced from a 4-desk counter to just one in a tiny box room which is ‘appointment only’.

It was also brought to the Judge’s attention that the claim for possession of the property is 2 ½ times in excess of the amount alleged to be owed. In simple terms, a claim for a property and land valued at £200k when the amount owed is just £80 is an inequitable one. When asked if this was a court of equity, the judge replied that it was and that all courts of England and Wales have been since the nineteenth century. In other words, the matter has to dealt with in equity now Steve has evoked it.

The Judge apologised for the shit service and said it was best to serve the Defence and Counterclaim by email.

Conclusions

During WW2, the civil court jury system was suspended and never reinstated. The consequence of which is that, in the current system of ‘law’, one man, acting as the all-knowing judge, presides over a matter which was previously heard by a jury of 12 men and women. This state of affairs allows for all manner of conflicts of interest and bias to hold sway in each and every possession hearing. After all, money talks and bullshit walks and the judges are handsomely rewarded for finding in favour of the fake financiers over individuals, even when there is material evidence of fraud – a fraud in the factum. The Civil Court System of which Charles III is the nominal head is a captured operation that always finds in favour of the Bank when it comes to disputes between those entities and LIP.

HMCTS frowns upon the LIP, falsely regarding him as an unpredictable and vexatious litigant who deserves short shrift from the Judge, from the office staff and even the in-security guards.

Above and beyond all that, we have a system of faux statutory legislation which lies like a cracking and deeply potholed layer of tarmac over the bedrock (or the cobble stones) of the British people’s Common Law. An apt metaphor, given the manifest deterioration of the highways and byways of our realm.

To extend the metaphor, this ‘tarmacking’ over the cobblestones of our ancient jurisprudence is the same as that fake narrative that would have us believe that the Romans were the ones who built our major highways and byways, when, in fact, those roads already existed and had done since time immemorial.

As previously stated,

“it (our ancient jurisprudence) goes back to 2400 years ago and the establishment of the Moelmutine laws which created a system of equity – justice with no fear or favour. That system is in our ancestral blood and the time is coming when the wonderful people of these islands, being well-aware of their common law inheritance, will stand up to claim it. They will simply have no other choice, for it is in their very nature to assert their ancient common law, with its protections, customs and rights.”

The sticky black overlay of ‘legislation’, statutes and various deceptive practices such as the use of ‘legalese’ is akin to the use of graphene oxide in the jib-jabs: its existence prevents the mind and body from functioning correctly.

When the very arteries of the courts are clogged up with phoney legislation and a modus operandi that thwarts the ordinary man before he has even set foot in the court, then it is only a matter of time before the corpus (HMCTS) collapses – just like the ever-increasing numbers who have fallen victim to the #3DartFinish.

The courts were in a slow state of degeneration 14 years ago. The UK Government was warned about the disastrous consequences of securitisation back in 2008. The legislative arm of the ‘State’ has done fook all about it, the 650 treacherous MPs who preside in Parliament have ignored the degeneration and fattened themselves on the public purse.

Whilst the odds of a fair hearing are certainly stacked against Steve in his dispute with the fake lender, it is worth remembering that it is always best to take action and, of course, that may include self-defence in all its forms, including defending oneself in the rigged court system.

Doing nothing is not an option.

As ever, my gratitude goes out to David R for his relentless support of Rogue Male. Should any reader like to contribute to the running of the site, then please ‘Buy me a coffee’ via the button. Thank you.

0

Stop Funding the Terrorist State

Are you funding a terrorist state?

If you’re not sick to the gills of the tyranny and genocide being perpetrated by the terrorist state known as the criminal UK Government then stop reading now.

Taxation levels in the UK are currently rising and destined to further increase by direct correlation to the plundering that has been escalated by the traitors in government who initiated a plethora of self-enrichment scams via the numerous inherent frauds of the Divoc 91 psy-op.

These bloated pigs who suckle at the teat of the Banksters and their criminal associates in the WHO, the WEF, the Gates Foundation and any and all big Pharma producer who has profited from the death by needlepoint mass murder campaign of the last 3 years are beyond contempt.

Every utterance they make is in tune with the pronouncements and programmes of those listed foreign agencies, from whom they have taken payments to buy their silence over the genocide by injection.

Traitors is the collective noun for those who falsely claim to be representing the interests of the people yet who simultaneously take back-handers from those outside agencies to promote mass-murder agendas, as initiated over 125+ years ago by the Eugenics movement.

The hoax that is evolution would have us believe that only the strongest and finest of our humanity survive, the best examples of Mankind. Thus, even on that ridiculous level, it is staggering that those who espouse Eugenics are manifestly not the Adonis figures they believe themselves to be. If the horseshit that is Eugenics were remotely true, then the likes of its advocates, for instance, Bill ‘Bitch-Tits’ Gates and Boris ‘Pfeffel’ Johnson would not have a hope in Hell of influencing or controlling people for in no way could either be held up as the standard of being to which Mankind should aspire. They are as short in stature as they are in intellect; their lying reveals their Crowleyian immorality and their physical prowess is is as puny as the false gods they serve.

No. We are ‘ruled’, not by lions, but by some of the worst examples of humanity imaginable.
This is, of course, their weakness. They are palpably not statesman-like, they are not intellectual heavy-weights replete with great powers of reasoning; they have little, if any creativity, they lie and rely on false narratives to propel themselves onwards and are clearly of a parasitic nature for they leach upon the people they ridiculously claim to have power over.

The one ring which controls everything and everyone across this cess-pit realm most effectively is MONEY. Each and everyone of the traitors in Government is in thrall to it.

As readers will be aware, I have previously challenged a number of these treacherous banking and state entities and I am loathe to give them so much as the steam off my piss. Imagine my annoyance when, 3 weeks ago, I returned to my motor to find one of the black and yellow Penalty Charge Notices (PCN) stuck to my windscreen. It falsely claimed that a parking charge was owed due to the conveyance being in an alleged ‘Permit Parking’ zone.

Why do I say it is a false claim?

For the simple reason that under the Bill of Rights, 1689, which is in full cause and effect, it is illegal under the Laws of these lands for an individual to receive any form of levy, tax demand, charge, punishment etc that has not been through a Court of Law. Common Law that is.

Within 2 days of it being stuck on my windscreen, it was returned directly to the CEO of the Borough Council from which it originated, along with the following Notice. You will notice that it was ‘refused for cause’ – in other words, in accord with the established Laws of these lands, there was no valid cause to issue it as the matter had not been heard by a Common Law Court of Record, which renders it unlawful.

Note well the clear reference to what I reasonably regard as the right to not contribute to the continued existence of what I consider to be a terrorist state.

Notice of Attempted Levy (PCN) Refused for Cause
Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal
Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent

K*** Mar***tt, CEO,
Rushcliffe Borough Council
Rushcliffe Arena
Rugby Road
West Bridgford
NG2 7YG

Monday, 20 March 2023

Dear K*** Mar***tt,

please find enclosed a ‘Penalty Charge Notice’ (your ref: NQ26245324) that was purportedly issued by one of your agents on 18/03/23 and is refused for cause on the following grounds:

1. It is unlawful on the simple basis that the Bill of Rights 1689 is in full cause and effect, meaning that all Grants and Promises of Fines and Forfeitures of particular persons before Conviction are illegal and void.

2. It is illegal on the simple basis that it is purportedly issued by ‘Rushcliffe Borough Council’ for and on behalf of Notts County Council (the beneficiary of the parking scam) and under International Law it is the right and obligation of an individual not to support violations of international law by any State.

Given the criminal actions of the UK Gov which include but are not limited to:

1. The imposition of criminal ‘lockdowns’ against the people;

2. The mass-vaccination of its people with improperly tested serums and associated damage to the health of the population, over an alleged virus that has never been proven to exist;

3. Governmental treason via the UK States collaborations with foreign agencies such as the Gates Foundation, the WHO and WEF ‘recommendations’ over said Covid ‘virus’ and,

4. The illegal funding of a war in Ukraine, including the Azov Battalion,

The trustees take the view that it would be immoral to pay a State levy when said state is engaged in demonstrable acts of terrorism/criminality against the people it falsely claims to represent.

We trust this clarifies the matter.

However, in the event you continue to pursue this matter in a vain attempt to levy moneys for and on behalf of the rogue UK State, each piece of correspondence will incur a £1,200 administrative charge, nunc pro tunc.

Yours sincerely, etc”

In other words, if you can articulate the how and why of the UK being a terrorist state (which is manifestly easy) then you are morally and lawfully bound NOT to give the Eugenics-lead genocidal maniacs so much as a penny. This applies to any state entity which is fraudulently claiming you owe it anything.

As the tag-line for this site goes,

Do no harm, take no shit.

 

A heartfelt thanks to David R for his ongoing support.

Should any reader and/or listener appreciate the work at RogueMale and wish to support me, please consider making a donation via the donate button or the ‘Buy Me a Coffee‘ link. Thank-you.

 

2

Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Baskerville 2 by Anders Noren.

Up ↑