Usury is the Parasite

What is the single greatest thing that prevents Mankind from flourishing? Usury.

u·su·ry | ˈyo͞oZH(ə)rē |
noun
the illegal action or practice of lending money at unreasonably high rates of interest: the medieval prohibition on usury.
• archaic interest at unreasonably high rates.
ORIGIN
Middle English: from Anglo-Norman French usurie, or from medieval Latin usuria, from Latin usura, from usus ‘a use’ (see use).

Usury is the unlawful practice of charging interest, including compound interest on financial loans. When credit is created as (fake) financial debt and falsely represented as a ‘loan’, then those who have the power to create and control credit are the de facto masters of this realm. ‘Money’ is but a medium of exchange, used by the parties to the purchase of goods and/or services.

To charge interest is usury and under the ancient law of these lands, usury is unlawful – and, for good reason.

To charge interest on fictitious loans is nothing less than criminal.

I recently replied to a post on X about a man who had been jailed for exposing how certain individuals within the fake financial system had been fixing interests rates via the LIBOR swindle with one word to sum it up: USURY,

The charging of interest on loans is a peculiarly Jewish trait that goes back at least 3 thousand years.

For hundreds of years it was banned in northern European countries, the peoples of which viewing it as anathema to their own values. Historically, his antipathy towards usury has invariably led to an upwelling of resentment towards the despised ‘money changers’ for it has always been the way that when a native population goes thoroughly sick of the financial frauds being perpetrated against the peoples, it will rise up against it.

Time after time this has happened – 109 countries have expelled the Jews from within as a consequence of it and, as I have opined on many an occasion, what goes around comes around.

On a personal note, by 2009 I had paid back some £67,000 on an initial mortgage secured for a ‘loan’ of £34,000. There was but £30, 000 on the side of the ledger that the bank (the Bradford and Bingley) were falsely claiming I ‘owed’ them.

Yes, let’s reiterate that point: I had made payments from the fruit of my labours to the a value that was around TWICE what they claimed to have loaned me.

In the end, I had grown sick of it – sick of paying out extortionate amounts of interest on a balance that only seemed to reduce gradually at best. At worst, it never seemed to go down at all, no matter how many payments I made (some of which were additional to the monthly claimed amounts).

I am not going to bleat about it for it was what it was and when I challenged the blatant iniquity of it, I became subject to a series of criminal acts that extended from a certain Tom Buckland, paralegal at Drydens’ debt collection agency in Bradford, through to Richard Inglis of Nottingham County Court, to Benjamin Wood, barrister, David Caress, bailiff at the county court, my conveyancing solicitor, Ed Cursham, Judge Peter Smith of the High Court, Judge Wynn Williams of the High Court, Mr Sullivan, barrister to Sir Ross Cranston, former Solicitor General in the criminal Labour Government from 1997-2001.

That is quite a list but what unites them all is the sheer desperation that was expended against me in order to cover up the Great British Mortgage Swindle, to silence me and, eventually, to steal my humble home from me in a police operation on the 4th November, 2010.

Whilst there will always be a cacophony of spunk trumpets who blare out the ‘should have paid’ mantra, it is a fact that without usury none of this would have happened.

When enough is not enough and we see it unfolding before our eyes, then we can be sure that overarching greed is at the heart of the problem.

I had paid them double what they claimed to have loaned me – that is beyond honourable when we consider that no actual loan had ever taken place in the first instant and that my signature was used to provide the credit to purchase the property in full at the time.

And yet, to the depraved mammon infected money lenders, this was not enough.

When the bankruptcy of the entire world is run by the Rothschilds, via the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, the IRS, the Central banks, down through the licenced lenders of nothing to be enforced through a captured judiciary, it does not take much to work out that the world is in a state of financial indenture, drowning in incarnadine seas of fake debt and all of it, whether it be personal loans, fake loans made to local councils, to national governments or to international agencies, is subject to usury.

The application of which results in some of these loans not being discharged for nigh on 200 hundred years (witness the loans made to the ‘UK’ government for the waging of its Napoleonic campaign which were not discharged until 2015,

Typicslly, the mindbenders call it ‘interest’ in an attempt to soften the practice, not unlike sodomy being labelled bum banditry or something similar.

“Compound interest was known to ancient civilisations, but the first traces of mathematicians analysing it are from medieval era. A clay tablet from Babylon, dating from about 2000–1700 B.C., might be the first display of the compound interest problem.”

This demonstrable financial servitude to the usurers is like an infestation of woodworm that riddles its way through every level of society, including the criminal UK government.

“At the start of World War I in 1914, the national debt stood at £650 million. On March 31, 1919, it had increased to £7,434 billion of which £3 billion is still outstanding after 95 years of an interest rate of 3.5% per annum.

In the 1919 budget 40% of expenditure was allocated to the payment of interest. In World War II, the national debt rose by almost 300% from £7.1 billion in 1939 to £20.1 billion in 1945. As at March 2017, it stands at over £1.8 trillion.

However, if one includes all liabilities, including state and public pensions, it exceeds £5 trillion.”

Source: Chapter II, A history of central banking and the Enslavement of Mankind, Stephen Mitford Goodson, 2019 ed.

The world has been and is continuing to be be fooked by Usury, there is no simpler way of expressing it. The question is, how much longer can the Jewish financiers keep it going for?

Do you fancy a bet? Well, apparently the Jews of London were placing bets in 1666 on Sabbatai Sebi being the Messiah. He wasn’t, of course – he was just a very naughty boy.

It is interesting, is it not, that in Extracts from Jewish World by Itamar Eichner (published 09.11.2006), we read,

“The Edict of Expulsion, passed by King Edward I in 1290 and calling for all Jews to leave Britain, has never formally been revoked. In order to rescind it, Queen Elizabeth II must sign a contrasting decree.

King Edward I decided in 1290 to evict all Jews from Britain. The reasons for this were many and varied, including blood libel against the Jews.”

Wherever and however far back one looks into recorded history, those who follow the satanic psycho-babble of the Talmud, those who falsely believe themselves to be God’s Chosen People and those who have invented and/or utilised to maximum effect all manner of financial enslavement technologies have been expelled from the countries which hosted them.

This was the case in 1290 when,

“King Edward signed edicts sent to sheriffs across England, in which he stated that all Jews are to leave the country or to be executed. The signatory date coincided with the Jewish date of Tisha b’Av.”

Why was King Edward so compelled to issue such an edict?

Financial malpractice was the major aspect of it – the institutionalisation of the Shetar, the original charging instrument that evolved into the mortgage – the Great British Mortgage Swindle began when the Iceni people wished to raise money and agreed to a charge over their lands for the benefit of the Jewish money-changers, who at that time, were not permitted to buy and hold land. Add to the mix the fact that usury was unlawful in common law realms and that the Jews were making huge profits from it and the picture becomes clearer.

Factor in the issue of the so-called  Blood Libels, whereby Jewish communities were accused of killing and drinking the blood of young boys from various towns and villages, and it is not difficult to see how such a demand for expulsion of Jewish people rose.

The edict has not been cancelled.

Although this sounds surprising – even unbelievable – the edict has not been cancelled and is still listed among British legal documents. It was actively in effect for decades until Oliver Cromwell allowed the Jews to return in the middle of the 17th century. In the past 350 years, the British Jewish community has become one of the largest and most thriving in the world, but the edict is still in effect.

… it is clear that the edict is a disregarded law and that England does not behave in accordance to Medieval norms manifested in the decree. However, in theory, the British have the capacity to kick out Israeli Jews, for example, when they come to visit in England.

All that needs to be done is for the queen [now King] to sign a contradictory decree, and this has never been done. I wonder when the Israeli government will appeal to the UK to have Queen Elizabeth II sign such a decree and revoke the edict issued by one of her forefathers.

The British Foreign Ministry issued a response (in 2006) stating that the ministry’s legal advisor doesn’t agree that there is a need to revoke the edict.

“Jews, like other religious minorities, received equal rights over a century ago, beginning with formal Jewish Emancipation in 1858, at which point Lionel de Rothschild was allowed to sit in the House of Commons after the law restricting the oath of office to Christians was changed, the ministry said.”

British Foreign Ministry, 2006 on the question of whether there was a need to revoke the Edict of Expulsion, 1290.

There is nothing new about this – the only thing that is new in this realm is the history we did not know about:

“Compound interest was known to ancient civilisations, but the first traces of mathematicians analysing it are from medieval era. A clay tablet from Babylon, dating from about 2000–1700 B.C., might be the first display of the compound interest problem.”

We may bleat about it all we like but the constrictions, despotism and all the iniquities of the realm flow from the one source: USURY and it needs to be abolished for the good of humanity.

___________________________

As ever, thank you for your attention.

Should you be appreciative of my essays and RogueCasts, then please consider chucking a few quid into the  coffers via the BuyMeACoffee button and/or take out a paid subscription at my Substack page, where you will be the first to receive my work. Cheers

_____________________________

RM Social Media links
Rogue Male website
Telegram channel for uncensored content
You Tube Channel 
Substack
Twitter/X
Facebook

Rumble