Feminism and the Diabolical Death Cult

at the Heart of the captured British State.

Do we have a problem with women in public life?

Is a question that I have yet to see being asked.

Doubtless it will cause some consternation. However, having been in this ‘world’ for over 22 thousand days, I am too long in the tooth to be pussy-footing around. I genuinely could not give a f*ck for social niceties at this point.

The various images that show the proliferation of women on the front benches of the current criminal Labour Government in the genocidal WEF sponsored House of Commons highlight the point perfectly.

Why do I state this? On the simple basis that a number of them are manifestly enthusiastic zealots for the two Bills which were voted in this last week by a significant number of the 650 traitors who take £100, 000 per year from the state purse for their services to their diabolical overlords. The vainglorious rise of women to positions of public responsibility is a trail that goes back to the early days of the terrorist organisation known as the Suffragettes, through the depravity of the Weimar Republic, the psychological manipulations of Edward Bernays, the faux liberation movement of the 1960s, with the introduction of the contraceptive pill and on to the deadly mandrake-like flowering of the full-blown Feminism of the present dystopia that has infected every level of life across Western Civilisation.

As Bernays, the nephew of the fraud that was Sigmund Freud, identified so demonstrably, women are emotional beings who will justify their actions not by reason but on the basis of their feelings. This makes them easier to manipulate – just look at how all advertising is directed towards them. Their emotional state means they are like putty in the hands of the controllers.

In all my days in this realm, I have yet to meet a man who has not suffered loss and difficulty at the hands of women. The schism between men and women is, of course, all engineered down to the finest detail. Indeed, it goes hand-in-hand with the concerted efforts of the controllers to shatter and splinter the traditional family and its natural strengths.

It was once stated that ‘behind every good man, there is a good woman.’

Sadly, bar a tiny number of exceptions, those days are long gone. To reiterate my point – I know many good men but not one of them can state that the vast majority of all the problems he has had to deal with in his life have not been caused by women.
Many have gone through dastardly divorces and traumatic separations from their children. They have been subject to unfettered levels of approbation, financial penury and experienced alienation that has all but broken them.

This is not to say that the trials and tribulations of so many men at the hands of women have not been insurmountable. A good number of men have been able, by way of their indomitable strength of character and their sound, cheerful reason to rise above and beyond these travails. However, many have not and too many have taken their own lives as a consequence of the falsely-engineered entitlement of those women whose hearts and minds have been shaped by the pernicious forces of feminism.

By way of example, let us take a brief look at the female players behind the two referenced Bills of the criminal UK Government that passed their first readings and votes this past week.

Firstly, they voted for this monstrous piece of legislation which attempts to make the actual murder of babies legitimate up to and including their birth,

“the Crime and Policing Bill which decriminalises abortion and legitimises infanticide (killing babies). Since David Steel’s 1967 abortion act – 12 million babies have been aborted.

In 1983 there were 8,419 abortions.

In 2024 there were 300,000 abortions.” https://x.com/NickTenconi

That means that a premature new born baby can be murdered at the behest of its mother when it comes out of the womb. It is nothing less than a state-sanctioned infanticide.

“In the week leading up to June 21, 2025 (i.e., around June 17-20, 2025), the UK Parliament made significant changes to abortion laws, which have been widely reported. These changes were part of an amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill, voted on by the House of Commons on Tuesday, June 17, 2025. This amendment, led by Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi, aimed to decriminalise abortion for women who self-manage their pregnancies, effectively removing criminal penalties under the Offences Against the Person Act 1861.

Decriminalisation of Self-Managed Abortions:

The amendment removes the risk of prosecution, arrest, investigation, or imprisonment for women in England and Wales who terminate their own pregnancies, regardless of the gestational stage (i.e., no specific term limit is imposed for self-managed abortions).

This change marks the most significant reform to British abortion laws in nearly 60 years, aligning with advocacy from groups like Amnesty International and the British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS).

Secondly,  the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill was introduced as a private member’s bill by Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, following years of debate on assisted dying in the UK. It was first presented to the House of Commons in late 2024.

On Friday, June 20, 2025, the House of Commons voted to advance the bill with a margin of 330 to 275, marking a historic step toward legalising assisted dying in England and Wales.

Key Provisions

The bill applies to adults (aged 18 and over) who are terminally ill, with a prognosis of six months or less to live, as confirmed by two independent doctors.

Whichever way one wishes to dress it, both Bills attempt to legitimise murder of those amongst us who are most vulnerable – babies, the disabled, the terminally ill and the elderly.

Tonia Antoniazzi is the woman who “led a successful amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill, passed on June 17, 2025, to decriminalise self-managed abortions for women in England and Wales, marking a significant reform to abortion laws.”

A former teacher from Wales, Antoniazzi is a curious character, with a penchant for trouser suits and a masculine appearance and someone who evidently has no children. As many have pointed out, her appearance in Parliament in a lurid green suit has echoes of the Riddler character in Batman.

Who’s wearing the trousers?

With regard to the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, we have a certain Kim Leadbetter, a former fitness instructor who was elected in 2021. Like Antoniazzi, she is not married and has no children.

How interesting that both of these women are childless. Their heifer (a young female cow that has not borne a calf) like status may go some way to accounting for their apparently perverse attachment to these diabolical causes.

Whilst Leadbetter is an admitted lesbian, Tonia Antoniazzi has chosen to keep her sexuality private. However, going solely on her appearance, it would be no surprise if she also shares the same unnatural predilections as Leadbetter.

 

Simply put, a former teacher and fitness coach are the two women who have crow-barred the Death Cult legislation into place.

I could go on, citing the fraudulent woman acting as chancellor, the woman responsible for the Safeguarding of Women and Children (Jess Phillips), the seemingly unhinged deputy Prime Minister, Angela Rayner, the Home Secretary Home Secretary Yvette Cooper and how each of them are over-promoted into positions to which they are manifestly incapable of acting and how they attempted to discredit as right wing racists all those who pointed out the obvious fact of the industrial scale rape by Pakistani muslims of hundreds of thousands of young British girls.

On which subject, I wonder how many of those girls that were targeted by the taxi-driving rapists were from broken families, with no male head of the household?

That these diabolical crimes have become so prevalent in an epoch where feminism has run amok is no mere coincidence. After all, is it not the case that hard times create strong men and licentiousness creates weak men (manginas)?

To return to the question, do we have a problem with women occupying positions in the public institutions of the state?

It is self-evidently the case that where emotionally-driven agendas and feminism’s fake entitlements have infected the female psyche on such a mammoth and all-encompassing scale there is a huge problem.

In 2017, I wrote this article about the true nature of women: it is as pertinent today as it was then:

the fact remains that social engineering exists and collectivisation is more likely to appeal to the nature of women than men. Male, or female we have been had. The transhumanist agenda, just like feminism before it, is the latest manifestation of this social engineering, and, like all of it, is as much an attack on the nature of the female as it is on the male.

As ever, thank you for your attention. If you are feeling appreciative, please chuck a few quid into the pot via the BuyMeACoffee button and/or take out a paid subscription at my Substack page.