Why would a mother contract with a Death Cult to have her infant son circumcised?
Following on from my previous essay on circumcision, this is an imagined extrapolation of what would really occur were the Terms and Conditions fully-disclosed concerning the implications of such an agreement.
What I find most egregious is the fact that new-born infant boy cannot consent to the act and, as was the case for my 8 month old self, it was my mother who entered the agreement. Paint it as you wish, an infant child is wholly reliant on his mother and father to nurture and protect him from harm.
Of course, any agreement that fails to disclose the full terms and conditions and/or the true import of the contract is null and void on those grounds alone. Whatever your take on the true nature of this realm, your consent is required.
This consent is inavariably predicated on your agreeing to some ‘service’ that you do not understand, do not require or in which you are not given the full facts of the matter.
The most pernicious and damaging example from rcent times is, of coure, the Divoc 91 operation against Mankind, a psy-op that was engineered to put the collective in a state of fear, from which the media span out a multitude of propaganda, intended to cause mass-psychosis in the populace to the point where most would willingly accept the injection of an untested serum, the ingredients of which were not disclosed. Without full disclosure of the contents, there could be no consent, from which it naturally follows that Big Pharma and all its lackeys committed fraud against Mankind.
A TRADITIONAL JUDAIC RECIPE FOR THE PSYCHIC DISRUPTION OF A MALE
– NHS INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE UNTHINKING MATRIARCH/GENTILE MOTHER-
(may also be useful for muslims and/or any others who choose willful ignorance over truth)
DIRECTIONS
- Take one complete healthy newborn baby boy
- Register him with the state authorities as soon as possible, without question as to what it means to do so
- Permit any and all state-sponsored ‘Health’ workers access to him
- Do not question the purpose of such access
- Do not question the authority of the Doctors
- When a health worker suggests he would benefit from being circumcised, do not question this no matter what your maternal instincts tell you
- Allow the baby boy to be admitted into a hospital for this operation
- Do not question whether you or anyone has the right to mutilate him and/or whether it should be left for him to choose when able, whether or not he wants 20% of his penis removing by way of an unnecessary operation
- Agree with the white coats at all times – especially if they have a stethoscope and use the initials, ‘DR’
- When the time is right, take him to the white coats at their temple
- Accept that the operation will be performed in a brightly lit inner temple, conducted by priests who wear masks and wield macabre stainless steel instruments
- Understand he will feel immense pain: this is only to be expected as no anaesthetic is used
- Ignore any misgivings or sensations that arise in the pit of your stomach
- Hand the baby over
- Ignore any screams that may emanate from behind the door of the theatre
- Upon return of your butchered boy, be sure not to allow any germs to come near his mutilated penis
- Do not ask what has become of the foreskin – rest assured, we will dispose/sell or utilise it for our benefit
- Do not be concerned if he appears withdrawn – he has gone into post traumatic stress disorder as a direct consequence of the butchery and this is only ‘natural’
- When, as he grows older, he questions why his penis is different from the others he may see, simply tell him;
- a) that as a baby he had difficulty urinating and that genital mutilation was the only way to relieve this
- b) tell him that it’s not unusual and that millions of muslim and jewish boys have it done to them
- c) assure him that as a consequence of this act against nature, his penis, minus its protecting hood, will be more hygienic and that he will be less prone to sexually transmitted diseases should he engage in congress with a large number of unsuitable women
Potential Side Effects
- It is likely there will be some neurological re-wiring of his brain’s circuitry.
- He may become introverted as a consequence of this – don’t worry, such withdrawals are to be expected
- He may harbour a deep resentment towards you which, whether identified or not, may result in breaking the natural bond that exists between a mother and her son.
- May have the effect of him developing a mistrust of women in general
- It may well cause cognitive difficulties in his development – but don’t be unduly concerned about that as, on a positive note, that may be of benefit to those who would seek to control him
- He may develop an almost preternatural ability to tolerate physical and emotional pain
- As a result of the removal of a large number of glands from his penis, he may find sex somewhat less satisfying than others who have not been so mutilated
- He may resent you for the rest of your days – even if it remains unspoken
- It is possible he will harbour a similar resentment towards his father on the basis he did nothing to stop the
butcheryunnecessary nor did he question it - Should the lie that it was for hygienic reasons begin to unravel, note this could have further deleterious consequences for your already incurably damaged relationship
- You may be able to live with this by ignoring the lie and/or refusing to apologise for the breach in nature but please note, the side effects will continue to manifest in the absence of a settlement.
Still wish to go ahead?
Fine, sign here…
© THE NHS JUDAIC CULT.
Thank you for reading. Should you be feeling appreciative, then please chuck a few quid in the pot, via the Buy Me a Coffee button, leave a comment and I will get back to you.
My work can also be read on Substack, which, at least as far as I can tell, appears to be a home to free speech and provides writers and podcasters with an opportunity to be tipped a few coins for their efforts.
Discover more from ROGUE MALE
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
I can add a little context from a woman’s viewpoint, but sadly it does not apply in your case. When you are in labour the pain is intense and goes on for countless hours in some cases. It tires the labouring woman, she loses patience and gets irritable, and just wants it all over quick as possible. At home, my choice, with no medical interventions, being in charge of what goes on (empowered) with midwives who work to fulfill your wishes, things are different. Much quicker for a start, mine 4 hours each from absolute start of pain to birth. That’s because we walk around and let nature guide us as to when we need to change position and how we’ll give birth. Midwives there throughout, and ensure all is well. At hospital under the ‘system’ it’s different. Bound to a bed, hooked up to equipment (I had the equipment available at home too!), lots of interventions, sterile medical environment, pain meds etc. Then birthing in the ‘stranded beetle’ position against nature. Labour longer, always a problem leading to an intervention of some sort, always saving the life of mother, baby or both. Long labours with lack of progress and signs of baby in distress get sent to hospital as a caution. If baby is known to have miscarried and home birth planned, those mothers still choose home rather than hospital and all their ‘rules’ and ‘procedures’. It’s all over quicker naturally and at home, without pain meds and lying down. Now, it’s no surprise to me that hospital birthing is long, arduous and has complications, interventions and all sorts. I was baking cakes and took my newborn out for a walk in the pram within hours of birth, bonding, and back to teaching ballet the next day. Truly! Now, I still felt like a train wreck, hormones rushed back in, as too all those emotions. Still vulnerable in so many ways – but at least NOT vulnerable to coercive influences. In hospital these after birth shocks are magnified by medical influences, more interventions, more meds, things being done to baby without your knowledge or consent, with the typical token ‘hero worship’ going on because you’re assured that if you’d had a home birth then mother, baby or both will have surely died. The influence of circumcision is there too. A question on a checklist at home that’s not pushed if refused, and no pamphlets trying to promote it given. Hospital bombards new mummy with so much when she’s at her weakest, most vulnerable and most suggestible. She may even believe the hospital has ALL her best interests at heart. Now, your mum may have had all the coercive influences at your birth, and signed you up while in that vulnerable state. However, that influence didn’t change her mind. I ask why the males in this story didn’t step in. But I understand they weren’t allowed to engage much back in those days too. Thankfully my home birth team not only covered everything to do with pregnancy, birth, and afterwards – but a whole lot more! Doing this so far in advance meant decisions could be made by both parents long before the birth, in full sound mind and body. It does not surprise me how this is never covered in hospital and left until mummy is not in right frame of mind to decide or sign anything, telling her all these suggestions are ‘normal procedures’ or just ‘routine’. I really believe all these conversations, and more, need to be had long before stepping foot in a maternity ward, birth centre or at home – by both parents. And dad’s who are ‘done’ should not be pushing for their sons to “be like them” either, but have those icky discussions and do the research.
I agree and would only add that the National Death Cult takes advantage of the hormonal and emotional state that naturally occurs, of which, I would posit, the system of birth registration is a particularly egregious fraud. My son was born at home, which took away any ability of the midwives to take that advantage.