The origins of the feminist meme, its cancerous growth, its deleterious effects and Man’s Remedy to this maligned situation.

Before we go any further into this, let’s be clear about something. Like each and every piece on this site, when the RM refers to ‘Man’ he is being accurate, not ‘sexist’ as some shallow troublemaker may choose to read it (largely as a result of their mind programming, it has to be said).

MAN is the collective noun for each of us. Don’t like it?  Jog on, there is nothing for you here.

Similarly, when the pronoun ‘he’ is used, it is usually non-gender specific. Can’t get your head round that? Leave now, this is not a place for the feeble minded.

If this website represents anything other than one man’s research and wisdom, it is as a counterpoint to the deliberately and overly feminised world in which we find ourselves; a world, which the perceptive reader will see, has been constructed around us and has been infected with myriad memes, each and everyone wth the aim of controlling mankind by psychological weapons of mass distraction & deception and biological weapons of mass infection.  This website is not for the pussy-whipped, the browbeaten or downtrodden male of the species known as Man. Don’t like it?  Fine, goodbye and good luck.

That, however, is not to state that such men do not have my sympathy in so far as they have fallen prey to those who would control them via their sexual desires and learned methods of domineering and bullying. Men like this have been manipulated by women who, in their turn, have been similarly manipulated, often via the insidious mind programme known as ‘feminism’.

[from Latin insidiosus ‘cunning,’ from insidiae ‘an ambush or trick,’ from insidere ‘lie in wait for,’ from in- ‘on’ + sedere ‘sit.’]

That word is most appropriate, as the following video establishes,

Having been subjected to a variety of feminist programmes, indirectly and directly, the RM is writing here from a position of personal experience, combined with research and reason.

Experience has taught RM that to argue and/or attempt to reason with an emotional (wo)man is like attempting to carry water in a net. It is an utter waste of one’s time and energy, an exercise in supreme futility… akin to trying to gain justice in one of Britain’s courts  if your opponent is a Bank or an agency of the Crown (DVLA, HMRC, Social Services … etc)

One is better off leaving the room. Or, in the words of a friend, stating, “Look, if I had a lower IQ,  I’d love to discuss this further… but I’ve got to go… goodbye.”

A little knowledge can be a dangerous thing, especially when in the hands of one who is woefully ignorant of the facts let alone just who and what he is.

Let’s begin by critically examining the Definition of Feminism given by Wikipedia: we’ll use this as it provides us with a commonly accepted overview of its characteristics.

Feminism is a collection of movements and ideologies aimed at defining, establishing, and defending equal political, economic, and social rights for women. This includes seeking to establish equal opportunities for women in education and employment. A feminist advocates or supports the rights and equality of women.

Screen shot 2014-03-12 at 12.37.41That paragraph is built on a series of fallacies, all of which emanate from the use of the word ‘equal’. The notion that we are and/or should be all equal is a false premise which instantly undermines the feminist argument.

Equality does not exist other than as a collectivist fantasy: we are not all equal, we are each individual.  The notion that anyone has political, economic and/or social equality is therefore a mirage. That is manifestly obvious under any political system that is operating throughout the world.

Feminist theory, which emerged from feminist movements, aims to understand the nature of gender inequality by examining women’s social roles and lived experience; it has developed theories in a variety of disciplines in order to respond to issues such as the social construction of sex and gender.

It follows there is no such thing as gender equality because there is no such thing as equality between people. Again, each and everyone one is unique.  People are free to choose what they wish to do: anything other than that (ie forcing someone to engage in an activity they do not choose to do) whether that be through bribing them via their dependency on money or programming them into believing they have to a ‘job’, is at worst, slavery; at best, collectivism. Feminism is based on the fallacy that we are all equal, hence it’s founded upon a lie. Why seek equality when you have individuality?

Feminist activists campaign for women’s rights – such as in contract law, property, and voting – while also promoting bodily integrity, autonomy, and reproductive rights for women.

This statement falls on the basis that Man is born by a process of Nature. Ipso facto, he is Nature and in his natural state, he is living under Natural law, with complete freedom of choice from one instant to the next.

Thus, he is free to do that which he chooses to do, provided he does not cause loss or harm to another. As is only too apparent to those who are paying attention, these natural or divine rights have been deliberately concealed from him by way of a phony benefit privilege system, one aspect of which is nicely-illustrated by the Driving Licence swindle which effectively attempts to undermine his freedom to travel wheresoever he pleases.


Any other state of existence is fake: which is why all external forms of government are bogus systems of mass psychological manipulation. These matrices of control are layered with fantasy upon fantasy, deliberately creating discord and division where and when there would naturally be harmony.

Add feminism to the mix, designed to create division between the genders and the controllers work becomes infinitely easier.

Feminists are also labouring under the erroneous belief that a ‘career’ is something that is good, when, in fact, if one is paying any taxes, ‘national insurance’ and a mortgage/tribute to the ‘crown’ whilst living in a house that is registered to the Land Registry, then one is an indentured slave, existing under a system of fake Crown feudalism that has been subjected on the population of these lands since at least 1066.

To repeat: the feminist movement was deliberately engineered. In America, Rockefeller even admitted as much: it was a way of getting women out of the home and into the offices and factories so they could be taxed by the controllers. This LINK provides the evidence in support of that assertion for those who require it.

When a feminist states that he wants equal rights in the ‘workplace’, he is simply advocating more of the same, ie more enslavement to the corporate-state-banking oligarchy and kleptocracy. Without knowledge of that context, he is an unwitting exponent of (in)voluntary servitude (SLAVERY).

When a  feminist calls for an end to Patriarchal Government, he is missing the point which is that ALL government must end on the basis that all power lies with and in the individual, not in the collective mind set.

Feminism is thus another attempt at mass mind control and it is a highly effective one in so far as it has manifestly infected huge swathes of Mankind’s thinking processes. In short, it has become a form of consensus reality:

Consensus reality is a cartoon that is trying to become as real as steel. What deconstructs the steel and exposes the cartoon? There is only one thing that can do that. Nothing and no one else is going to do that.

The individual does it. 



Then, of course, there arises the issue of how feminism affects the sexuality of those who have fallen prey to its twisted manipulations:


Feminism, our official gender ideology, masquerades as a movement for woman’s rights. In reality, feminism is a cruel hoax, telling women their natural biological instincts are “socially constructed” to oppress them.

Feminism is elite social engineering designed to destroy gender identity by making women masculine and men feminine. Increasingly heterosexuals are conditioned to behave like homosexuals who generally don’t marry and have children. Courtship and monogamy are being replaced by sexual promiscuity, prophesied in Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World. Rockefeller and Rothschild created feminism to poison male-female relations (divide and conquer). Their twin objectives are depopulation and totalitarian world government.

Henry Makow: Cruel Hoax: Feminism and the New World Order

Perhaps the most diabolical and exasperating aspect of feminism is the numbers of women that have fallen for its false premise. Hook, line and sinker. As Gerald Massey put it,

They must find it hard to take Truth for authority who have so long mistaken Authority for Truth.

In a viciously fake society,  it is a truly psychotic trick to play on Man. This means feminists have been held in the grip of a meme that has obscured the facts of their biology and is well-illustrated in the numbers of women who have ignored the biological fact that they are born with a finite number of eggs which means as they move towards and into their forties, that number is depleted, making it increasingly unlikely that they will be able to conceive children, especially if they haven’t already done so.

Many have bought into the lie that is the ‘career’ ( incidentally, a verb which means to hurtle along in an uncontrolled way) at the expense of that which comes naturally to them. This has lead to them contributing by way of taxation into all forms of oppressive governance. This, in turn, may lead to them giving up more of their so-called earnings to big pharma, which ever the one to make hay from the constructed ‘misfortunes’ (aka brainwashed state of mind manipulation) of others, moves in to offer a solution to a problem that, in Nature, does not exist ~ ‘Assisted Reproductive Technology’:

As the CDC pointed out in its 2009 report on Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART), the single most important factor affecting the chances of a live birth through ARTs is a woman’s age. At age forty, the chance is 18.7 percent; at forty-two, it’s 10 percent; at forty-four, it’s only 2.9 percent.

I didn’t think about that reality when I was growing up or even later during my college years when I was pondering my future. My generation was going to be different from that of our mothers. We were reaping the benefits of feminism. No one was going to tell us what to do, and we could control our bodies.

But crucial information was missing, and we didn’t know to seek it out: We have a finite supply of eggs, and if we wait until we are in our late thirties to start having kids, many of us may be disappointed. SOURCE

The discord and rancour resultant from feminism means that the male energy has been dispersed in so far as the male is often so psychologically, emotionally and spiritually battered that he is out of harmony with his masculine traits. Here is a pertinent observation:

I was very surprised to see this topic, because the Alpha Male is rare this days, in almost every country. A true (Alpha) Male is strong, takes care of his family, is not arrogant and has a strong set of morals and values. He treats men and women with respect, yet guards his boundaries and is not a push over. Alpha Male is a traditional male, regardless his religion, be he Christian, Muslim or a Jew, he holds on to that, and yes that means 10 commandments. No lying, cheating among others.” SOURCE

-∞- Remedial action -∞-

All power lies within the individual. The more each of us discovers the methodologies behind one’s enslavement, the more free each of us will be from its psychological grip. And there is the rub: the more freedom the individual experiences, the greater the opportunity for man (the species) to become free. It begins and ends with each man’s self-realisation. Consensus reality, of which feminism, as a deliberate meme implanted into the systems of control, is an integral strand, is the enemy of personal sovereignty, as indeed are any and all forms of collectivism:

Consensus reality is the reality of sacrifice. It is coagulating energy, form, content, substance that takes on amorphous shapes studded with slots into which people can fit themselves.

The independent individual thinks what he wants to think. Over time, he keeps graduating into new, more nearly unique levels of what he wants to think.

He rises above the group. He rises to his own thoughts.

Jon Rappoport


It is a stripping down that needs to take place ~ all erroneous memes of consensus thinking are best identified and dropped. Anyone who suggests that we are all in this together or that a course of action is for the greater good is perpetuating a lie that only serves to benefit the controlling kleptocracy. In the meantime, man has to deal with the fallout created by the arch manipulators of his consciousness ~ in a fake illusory world fuelled by the aggressive manipulation of the sacred feminine, psychopathic behaviour leaks from the individual, whether male or female.



The manipulation and subsequent division caused is manifest in the fake world of television where brainwashing programmes, dissected snippets of events, soaps and advertising bombard the viewer’s mind. The example (left) from over 40 years ago, serves to starkly illustrate the underlying modus operandi of the marketing industry, as influenced by Edward Bernays: it is a deliberate and callous appeal to the male ego, simultaneously working to cause anger in the female and is a vicious and knowingly psychotic piece of workwhich creates further division between the sexes through its manipulation of the ego, the emotions and perceptions of the audience. Whilst it is a relic from the past, one does not have to look too far to see that this imaginary on-going ‘battle of the sexes” is continually pumped out in more subtle but equally divisive means via women’s magazines and all forms of mainstream media.

How and why we can state this to be so lies in the rise of psychology and its subversive use through and by those who whore themselves out to the phony media and those cowardly self-serving, money worshipping pricks who own the cinematic, audio and printed outlets:


Manipulating behaviors

Intrigued by Freud’s notion that irrational forces drive human behavior, Bernays sought to harness those forces to sell products for his clients. In his 1928 book, “Propaganda,” Bernays hypothesized that by understanding the group mind, it would be possible to manipulate people’s behavior without their even realizing it. To test this hypothesis, Bernays launched one of his most famous public relations campaigns: convincing women to smoke.

In 1929, it was taboo for women to smoke in public and those who flouted convention were thought to be sexually permissive. Bernays’ client was George Washington Hill, president of the American Tobacco Company, who envisioned breaking this taboo to broaden the market for his Lucky Strike brand. Bernays asked Hill for permission to consult with New York’s leading psychoanalyst and Freud disciple, Dr. A.A. Brill, and was granted this unusual request.

This was the first but not the last time Bernays would consult with psychoanalysts to help shape his public relations campaigns. When asked what cigarettes symbolized to women, Brill’s response was that cigarettes were symbolic of male power.

Equating smoking with challenging male power was the cornerstone of Lucky Strike’s “Torches of Freedom” campaign, which debuted during New York’s annual Easter Parade on April 1, 1929. Bernays had procured a list of debutantes from the editor of Vogue magazine and pitched the idea that they could contribute to the expansion of women’s rights by lighting up cigarettes and smoking them in the most public of places—Fifth Avenue. The press was warned beforehand and couldn’t resist the story. The “Torches of Freedom Parade” was covered not only by the local papers, but also by newspapers nationwide and internationally.

Bernays was duly convinced that linking products to emotions could cause people to behave irrationally. In reality, of course, women were no freer for having taken up smoking, but linking smoking to women’s rights fostered a feeling of independence.


When Bill Hicks famously suggested that all marketing people do the world a favour and go and hang themselves, he was not joking. The controllers of the advertsing industry know exactly how to manipulate the mind of the audience via use of colour, emotion, sound and words and television is, at least for now, the preferred means by which to do this. As Neil Kramer in his coruscating essay, Television is for Women (2007) concludes,

In a world where television encourages women to deny their femininity and act like men, we see the continued erosion of the family unit, petty power struggles, astonishing selfishness, and deep identity crises. Perhaps worst of all, there is a dark amnesia obscuring the centuries of warm, happy, loving relationships between men and women. So what’s the solution? How do you limit the influence of the TV? Simple … pull the fucking plug.

And therein lies the solution: by stepping away from this overt psycho-manipulation and into harmony with one’s inner male-female aspects, the sovereign individual disarms all those who would seek control of his mind, body and spirit.

Feminism is simply divide & rule by way of proselytizing many women into becoming aggressive immitators of certain aspects of the male, whilst turning many men of into pussy-whipped effete shadows of their natural selves.

Know this: a woman in harmony with her natural tendencies will not be prone to living her life as a drama queen, whose lines are provided by soap opera writers ~



The cure to the illness of feminism lies in abstinence. One must starve the dis-ease by finding the harmony within.




  1. Agree, but maybe you could ask yourself what could you do to make masses of people individually come to realise this uncomfortable truth. Even if you are right, your knowledge is meaningless if you can’t point the door you are convinced individuals should cross. Do you REALLY want them to cross the door? Do you really care? Because I’d say there’s no real communication whenever there’s a lack of empathy. It can’t do any hurt to say “I understand you” in the sense that a nazi has a desire of betterment of the society which by itself isn’t wrong. It is about how a nazi would attemp to materialize this betterment which really brings up moral objections. It’s cool to become aware of how it is all a masquerade, and it is cool to let feminists let off some steam too. Maybe they listen to you after they shout, and they might even understand you if you were able to explain yourself in a way they could possibly understand. I guess not everyone is determined enough to pay the time and attention required to convince others, and prefer to rant online which is fairly easier.( BTW nice post on how the money is fake.)

    1. Hi, and thanks for the comment. I write for those who are interested and as an attempt to balance out the cultural marxist programming that has infected the consciousness of so many of us.

      Is it a waste of time? Well, firstly, I enjoy the process of formulating my arguments, based on my personal experiences and then putting it together as coherently as I can. My approach to it all when younger was to make light of it – ‘Of course I’m a feminist: it’s the only way to pull the chicks.’ Nowadays, I see its effects as being more harmful than I understood at the time.

      Nevertheless, it’s as much a pile of bullshit now as it always was.

As of January, 2016 comments are open... cheers!