Yesterday, a ‘dietician’ working for the NHS visited RM’s sick father.  Due to his illness, he has gradually lost his ability to swallow liquids (though he is still, just about able to eat) and virtually all mobility. Last month, his wife and carer, RM’s mother,  agreed with the NHS Trust that he should be placed on a high calorie intravenous system which pumps a ‘nutritional’ solution into his body that is supposed to re-hydrate him. This takes 12 hours , overnight. Last month, he had an operation to fit a feeding pipe directly into his stomach. This means there is a tube emerging from his stomach through what looks like an open bullet wound on the left side of his torso. The NHS workers euphemistically refer to it as a “peg.”


Reading through the ingredients, one sees there is a plethora of chemicals (and ‘soy’ derivatives) amongst which can be spotted ‘Sodium Fluoride’.

What is Sodium Fluoride?

1. Definition of SODIUM FLUORIDE
:  a poisonous crystalline salt NaF that is used in trace amounts in the fluoridation of drinking water and toothpastes, in metallurgy, as a flux, and as a pesticide” SOURCE

2. “Fluorine is an element. It is a gas, never occurring in its free state. In microscopic amounts complexed with other minerals, it is often listed as a trace mineral, a nutrient for human nutrition.


The fluoride added to 90% of drinking water is hydrofluoric acid which is a compound of fluorine that is a chemical byproduct of aluminum, steel, cement, phosphate, and nuclear weapons manufacturing.

Such fluoride is manmade. In this form, fluoride has no nutrient value whatsoever. It is one of the most caustic of industrial chemicals. Fluoride is the active toxin in rat poisons and cockroach powder.

Hydrofluoric acid is used to refine high octane gasoline, to make fluorocarbons and chlorofluorocarbons for freezers and air conditioners, and to manufacture computer screens, fluorescent light bulbs, semiconductors, plastics, herbicides, — and toothpaste.
It also has the ability to burn flesh to the bone, destroy eyes, and sear lungs so that victims drown in their own body fluid.”



“Once in the body, fluoride is a destroyer of human enzymes. It does this by changing their shapes. In human biochemistry, thousands of enzymes are necessary for various essential cell reactions that take place every second we’re alive. Without enzymes, we’d die instantaneously.”  SOURCE

3.  The European Union has classified it as a Toxin and Irritant under its Dangerous Substances Directive (67/548/EEC) SOURCE


4. “Fluoride is a soluble salt, not a heavy metal. There are two basic types of fluoride. Calcium fluoride appears naturally in underground water sources and even seawater. Enough of it can cause skeletal or dental fluorosis, which weakens bone and dental matter. But it is not nearly as toxic, nor does it negatively affect so many other health issues as sodium fluoride, which is added to many water supplies.

Sodium Fluoride is a synthetic waste product of the nuclear, aluminum, and phosphate fertilizer industries. This fluoride has an amazing capacity to combine and increase the potency of other toxic materials. The sodium fluoride obtained from industrial waste and added to water supplies is also already contaminated with lead, aluminum, and cadmium.

It damages the liver and kidneys, weakens the immune system, possibly leading to cancer, creates symptoms that mimic fibromyalgia, and performs as a Trojan Horse to carry aluminum across the blood brain barrier. The latter is recognized as a source of the notorious “dumbing down” with lower IQ’s and Alzheimer’s effects of fluoride.

Another not commonly known organ victim of fluorosis is the pineal gland, located in the middle of the brain. The pineal gland can become calcified from fluorides, inhibiting it’s function as a melatonin producer.

Melatonin is needed for sound, deep sleep, and the lack of it also contributes to thyroid problems that affect the entire endocrine system. The pineal gland is also considered the physical link to the upper chakras or third eye for spiritual and intuitive openings.

Various permutations of Sodium Fluoride are also in many insecticides for homes and pesticides for crops. Sometimes it is even added to baby foods and bottled waters. SOURCE


The product is manufactured by a Dutch company called ‘NUTRICIA’

In 2013, the company was found to be paying Indian doctors commission (aka, BRIBING) to prescribe and supply mothers with one of their products, a baby formula. SOURCE

With that information, RM decided to speak with the ‘Dietician’ about his concerns ~ this is how the conversation unfolded.

RM: You’re working as a dietician?

D: Yes

RM: Right, we have a serious concern about the ingredients in the Nutricia product. Here is the list. One of the ingredients is ‘Sodium Fluoride’. A cursory 10 minutes spent researching its harmful qualities will show that it is classified as a poison. Do you know it’s used as a rat poison?  We don’t think he should be having this stuff pumped into his body. Is there an alternative?  Are you aware that the Company was found to be bribing doctors in India to prescribe mothers with its baby formula and this resulted in a number of deaths of those babies?

D: Well, I hear what you are saying. Thing is, it has been ‘signed off’ as legal.  I know it’s a drug but it is legal.

RM: Why would they put poison in a nutritional product?

D: I’m not going to debate it, you’re entitled to your opinion.

RM: It is a poison. That is fact, not opinion.

D: All I’m saying is it has been ‘signed off’ as legal.

RM: Why is the NHS using this product?

D: The Trust has agreed to use it.

RM: Is there no alternative, a nutritional supplement without the fluoride?

D: No.

RM: Look, if he is able to eat food, does he need to be on this stuff everyday?

D: Yes. He must have it every day.

At this point, it became apparent he was talking to a drone. The woman is utterly fake. She operates under the job title, ‘Dietician’ yet is actively engaged in the promotion and supply of a substance that contains poison.


Suffice to say, after the actor had left, his mother sided with the phony expert (she is prone to this state of mind and it is one which directly caused harm to her son) and stated, “I thought she handled you rather well.”

Of course, the facts speak for themselves: the elephant in the room is in the shape of this question:

Why are the NHS (and its useful idiots) prescribing poisonous drugs to people?”

At that, his mother, as one might expect, fell silent.

The zombie apocalypse allegory is manifesting around us on a daily basis.

The more this unravels, the more it becomes apparent that the NHS, far from offering cures to people’s illnesses, is in the business of corporate sponsored involuntary EUTHANASIA:

Euthanasia (from Greek: εὐθανασία; “good death”: εὖ, eu; “well” or “good” – θάνατος, thanatos; “death”) refers to the practice of intentionally ending a life in order to relieve pain and suffering.

The thing is, has RM’s father consented to being killed off by the NHS?  Has he knowingly agreed to an acknowledged POISON being fed into his body?

The answer is no: has he fuck.

Neither he nor his wife had any knowledge that the fake nutritional substance/poison contains Sodium Fluoride when they agreed to it.

Any so-called dietician who administers these poisons to a patient, is in effect,  serving a genocidal agenda, whether or not s/he is cognisance of that fact.

This information causes COGNITIVE DISSONANCE. Upon hearing this, RM’s sister, whilst aware of the well-established dangers of fluoride, took the view that no way is this an NHS supported attempt to kill him off. She was told to read about the Liverpool Care Pathway for the Dying Patient (LCP) before dismissing the notion:

[it] is a UK care pathway (excluding Wales) covering palliative care options for patients in the final days or hours of life. It was developed to help doctors and nurses provide quality end-of-life care.

The Liverpool Care Pathway was developed by Royal Liverpool University Hospital and Liverpool’s Marie Curie Hospice in the late 1990s for the care of terminally ill cancer patients. Since then the scope of the LCP has been extended to include all patients deemed dying.

While initial reception was positive, it was heavily criticised in the media in 2009 and 2012.

In 2012, it was revealed that just over half of the total of NHS trusts had received or were due to receive financial rewards to hit targets associated with the use of the care pathway.[1] These payments are made under a system known as “Commissioning for Quality and Innovation” (CQUIN), with local NHS commissioners paying trusts for meeting targets to “reward excellence” in care.


SOURCE 2 (Daily Telegraph, 01, December ’13)

SOURCE 3 (Daily Mail, 23 November 2013)


Now, whilst the RM is not suggesting that those working for the NHS Trust are engaging in murder,  if the effect of the drugs they are administering to his dad are poisonous, then it is self-evident that their course of ‘treatment’ will kill him, without his consent.

To return to the question, is the NHS a Death Cult?, let us first consider the definition of what a cult is,

cult (n.)
1610s, “worship,” also “a particular form of worship,” from French culte (17c.), from Latin cultus “care, labor; cultivation, culture; worship, reverence,” originally “tended, cultivated,” past participle of colere “to till” (see colony). Rare after 17c.; revived mid-19c. with reference to ancient or primitive rituals. Meaning “devotion to a person or thing” is from 1829.

This may well prove to be the most accurate of all modern-day definitions,

Cult. An organized group of people, religious or not, with whom you disagree.” [Rawson]


Full Definition of CULT
1:  formal religious veneration :  worship
2:  a system of religious beliefs and ritual; also :  its body of adherents
3:  a religion regarded as unorthodox or spurious; also :  its body of adherents
4:  a system for the cure of disease based on dogma set forth by its promulgator <health cults>
5 a :  great devotion to a person, idea, object, movement, or work (as a film or book); especially :  such devotion regarded as a literary or intellectual fad

b :  the object of such devotion
c :  a usually small group of people characterized by such devotion

If a body of people place their unquestioning faith, collectively and individually, in an organisation of people which is operating under a system of beliefs that are without scientific reason or at odds with the facts which they are purporting to be engaging in, then that organisation, is by definition, a cult, no matter how large or small it may be.

Consider this: if a reasonable individual is informed that they are sanctioning the poisoning of another, albeit from an original point of nescience, once that fact is drawn to his attention, would he not be obliged to go away and investigate the matter with the attention it demands?

This woman appeared to be remarkably unfazed by the facts when they were presented to her: she was either in a state of shock brought on by cognitive dissonance or she was aware and, in spite of her acting out the role of the ‘caring professional’,  does not really give a fuck.

The blind allegiance many demonstrate towards the NHS in this country is characteristic of that of a cult and its followers, in the modern usage of the expression.

If they are not providing the information necessary to patients and their carers when faced with choices like the one related here,  when those ‘professionals’ have a clear duty of care to their patients to do so, then that is clear misrepresentation by omission [Fraud] and amounts to nothing less than gross professional negligence.

A man in RM’s father’s condition is very vulnerable and his wife is equally so as she is virtually caring for him 24 hours a day, a task which has become more onerous with the passage of time. It is reasonable to state that if he had not been at home since his condition began to worsen nearly three years ago, then he would surely have shuffled off this mortal coil some time ago. Nevertheless, it is also reasonable to state that she has an almost blind faith in ‘modern medicine’ as practised by the NHS.

RM be writing to the CEO of ‘Nutricia’ and copying in the CEO of the local NHS Trust, informing them that the family do not consent to the old man receiving any poisons.  The latter will also be informed that a professional negligence claim against their insurance policy may well be forthcoming.

THE ART OF DECEPTION AS PRACTICED BY THE BBC'S PORTRAYAL OF THE NHS. (Interesting use of chequer board floor...)
THE ART OF DECEPTION AS PRACTICED BY THE BBC’S PORTRAYAL OF THE NHS. (Interesting use of chequer board floor…)

Another aspect to this, of course, is the portrayal of the NHS in the Media and the mass mind-programming that results.

With programmes like Casualty which emanate from the Bread Beer Circuses [BBC] Propaganda Ministry, those working under the auspices of the National Health Service are depicted as intelligent, ‘dedicated’ and competent in that which they are doing.

Sadly, just as with the fake depictions of the police by a variety of sources, the levels of intelligence, dedication and competence are at odds with the daily experiences patients and their families endure under the auspices of ‘national health care’.

As is so often the case, the reality is 180′ from the fiction.

The remedy to this, as with every other state-corporate entity, is for the individual to remove his ties and step away. Some, like RM’s elderly parents, are too far gone to achieve this. We reap what we so and, unfortunately, his mother’s blind allegiance to the NHS Cult has brought this unfortunate state of affairs about, not withstanding the love and care she has shown her husband of 55 years, throughout this debilitating time.



RM’s father is fully aware of the facts. Having spoken with him this morning, he remains strong in spirit and is still of the view that he can make a recovery. In the light of this, if there is anyone reading this piece who is able to suggest a course of treatment that may help him, then please get in touch via email ~ .  Thank you.

Email this to someoneShare on Facebook58Share on Google+0Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn1

5 thoughts on “IS THE NHS A (SLOW) DEATH CULT?

As of January, 2016 comments are open... cheers!