For Whom the Bell Tolls

For whom the Bell Tolls

No man is an island,
Entire of itself.
Each is a piece of the continent,
A part of the main.
If a clod be washed away by the sea,
Europe is the less.
As well as if a promontory were.
As well as if a manor of thine own
Or of thine friend’s were.
Each man’s death diminishes me,
For I am involved in mankind.
Therefore, send not to know
For whom the bell tolls,
It tolls for thee.

By John Donne

Notes:

My recent Rogue Rant over Farage, Lowe and Habib – the ex-investment bankers who steadfastly refuse to rock the boat and consider the one ring to control it all – money/credit creation and control:

Does this make them faux leaders of the controlled opposition?

I posit that is the case.

Witness their collective and individual silence over the subject, the promulgation of the fake debt notion and their complete avoidance of MagnaCarta2025

Each of them has never experience penury, homelessness or what it is to not have a pot to piss in.
The British Class (caste) system – rooted in the private and public school education – indoctrination – system.

I muse on how none of them ever go near the subject of law – MC25 – the Golden Rule – instead, they post platitudes, empty rhetoric and memes like Detain, Deport, ‘Restore Britain’ and the illusion of a National Debt to the Houses of Rothschild, aka the fake banks, the licenced credit brokers.

The X doctrinal policy of freedom of speech but not reach is as persistent as it ever was – a suppression that began in the Convid days, and which has continued to this day.

I pontificate on the illusion of money and the law and how, from personal experience, it is clear that you will be suppressed by the algorithms of the various media platforms if you go into these subjects.

My personal recommendation of the exemplary work of Richard Werner – X link, one of the few who examines the subject of Money/Credit and its creation in any detail.

It is factually correct to state that NO LOAN ever takes place, whether it be to an individual, a council or the government of a country.

The greatest psy-op is this one Ring of Power – and one of a number of extraordinary men to point it out was Henry Ford,

I reference Paget’s Law of Banking (1904), from which the following quote is taken,

Paget’s Laws of Banking (1904)

P266.
In Ex parte Brett, L. R., 6 Ch. 841, it is implied that where a person accepts bills, not being under actual liability to do so, on having bills of lading transferred to him, those bills become part of his estate, though he can only hold them as security for the liability he incurs on behalf of the drawer.

Probably, as Mr. Chalmers says, “there is a kind of mixed property in the goods, both drawer and acceptor having a defeasible interest therein,” the acceptor’s interest extending to justify anything necessary for his protection or indemnity.

If the banker do not accept the bill of exchange he has no right to keep the bill of lading or other document of title, and no property in the goods passes to him. (Sale of Goods Act, 1898, s. 19, sub-s. 8; cf. Calm v. IW.-.7/X, (V.. Company [1899] 1 Q. B. 648.) As between the banker and the customer, an undertaking to forward bills of lading against acceptance will give the banker who has accepted the bill an equitable claim to the bill of lading, equivalent to a valid hypothecation of it, which would hold good against the customer’s trustee in bankruptcy. (Lutschcrv. Comptoird’Escompte,1Q.B.D. 709.)

But as against third parties, it would seem that nothing short of possession of the documents, or at least constructive possession of them, as by their having been posted to the banker, will give him a good title to the goods.“

The highlighted line further illustrates the point about how the Licenced Lenders of UK and elsewhere have ZERO right to possess anyone’s home when they do not have the ORIGINAL and VALID Deed of Mortgage. All of which is why the Great British Mortgage Swindle is a criminal racket of staggering proportions.

Even the former governor of the Bank of England, Joshua Stamp admitted to the fraud of the Rothschild controlled banks,

In simple terms, Monetary mechanics demonstrates that a credit card is a fraudulent representation of the facts – the notion that credit can and has to be paid back when it inverted as a ‘loan’. There is literally nothing to ‘pay back’.

The same applies to loans to buy homes. By way of example, when I bought my home in 1994 the credit extension, based on my salary at the time was some £34k, of which I had ‘paid back’ some £67k by 2010 when I was unlawfully evicted after challenging the Bradford and Bingley to prove a loan had been made and that there was a lawful mortgage deed and contract in place.

When it failed to do so, I launched a counter claim vs said credit provider and the fake lender immediately appointed barrister Benjamin Wood, a former banker at N.M Rothschild of London to shut me down and have me unlawfully evicted. The levels of psychopathy that were unleashed were incredible to experience.

My measured rant was posted on Rupert Lowe’s X account under a post he had made about the illusory National Debt – whilst his post had over 440k views, due to the algorithmic suppression my rant had a tiny 34 views, when time was, probably pre-Convid, it may well have garnered tens of thousands.

Can you see just how the game is rigged?

Whether its the financial game, the judicial one or the social media one?

Each operates as some kind of Plato’s Cave, designed to entrap and keep imprisoned the mind of the collective.

A new feature of my RogueCast is the Great British Bell End – GBBE – which will present one example/ candidate per week.

This week’s character is James Delingpole a flibbertigibbet establishment character, son and brother of Freemasons, a man whose role is to corral his listeners into a Limited Hangout that is fuelled by his penchant for rabbit holes of conspiratainment which only promote inaction and shallow thinking.

His brother, Dick, claims to be a Christian but this is, in the final analysis, palpably false as the religious cult of Freemasonry is, in fact, in worship of the false god, Jabalon – a thought form of the demiurge, that is most certainly not the True God.

In this way, James spins out falsities by the bucket-load and his defence of the dubious character Miri Bull-shit Finch, she of the empty rhetoric, in a private message to me more than qualifies him as this week’s nominee of GBBE in which I will highlight a character for the dubious honour of being a prize pillock of a deceiver.

I touch on Charlie Downes and the Generation Z, which is but a marketing description to characterise and target audiences for the targeting with advertising, who are compiled into general age groups – not a definitively accurate term but useful for the purposes of this discussion. Downes is another privately educated man who, in all probability, has never not had a pot to piss in.

As it stands, I am moving towards the view that Restore Britain is Controlled Opposition and it is noted that Rupert and his friends are pumping out empty platitude after platitude. In other words, and because they don’t go into the Law and Money issues, their rhetoric is empty. T

The seas of Great Yarmouth may not be populated with dinghy aliens but, at least as far a Rupert is concerned, they do appear to be waters of fallacy, whose empty rhetoric washes up like flotsam and jetsam on its sandy beaches.

_______________________________

Thank you for your attention. I am still without a UK bank account and I am currently homeless, which means any and all donations are most helpful and truly appreciated at this time, so please feel free to chuck a few quid into the RogueMale coffers.

Therefore, if you’re able, please consider taking out a paid subscription on Substack or donate via the Rogue Male Coffee Pot.

Until the next time, all the very best to you and yours and, remember, Fortune truly Favours the Brave.

August 25, 2025 1

Ding Dong Bell, Delingpole’s Down the Well

The Shekels or the ‘money’ is a chimera that many chase. It is a falsity on the simple basis that the money of the realm is neither lawful or real and because it is, as a matter of unassailable fact, a credit system of financial control. It is
The One Ring to Control Them All.

As I have written about extensively, the licenced credit brokers are not actual banks. They are traders in securities, which they either buy, sell for profit or, in the case of the Great British Mortgage Swindle, unlawfully procure through the thousands of duplicitous conveyancing solicitors whose ignorance of the facts is as manifold as the earth’s oceans.

In an essay written last year, I posited that I am not in the business of making friends or followers across social media, whatever the form those limited hangouts take. My output is to be measured qualitatively and not quantitively.

A year on and nothing has changed: Facebook, X and You Tube continue to implement shadow banning on the accounts that I have. Any followers I have are small in number, with YT currently standing at 245, regardless of the quality of my output. X stands at 1812 followers and Facebook c. 2.9k.

The X feed does not show me the posts from those whom I follow and my posts are tweaked by the algorythms to not appear in the feeds of my 1.8k followers.

Why might this be the case? It began some 5 years ago when I was writing about the Scamdemic and, in common with many others who were doing the same, a blanket of censorship was draped over my content.

The numbers who subscribe to the Rogue Male site has remained static and, as it stands, those who visit my site has nosedived, with visitors now inumbered in the tens when it was in the hundreds per day, especially when I made a post.

It is frustrating and it is designed to be so as demoralisation is the name of the game in which silencing me is the intention, to the point where I simply give up.

One may posit that ‘surely this is paranoia, Michael?’

To which I would counter that it may simply be awareness of the fact that for the last 16 years I have been engaged in a steady campaign of exposing and explaining the Banking Con which necessarily includes the Great British Mortgage Swindle and the actual mechanics of a ‘money’ system that is entirely an illusion. Henry Ford famously said – and I’m paraphrasing here – that only one man in a million could work it out and if the population were to grasp the swindle of banking, then the proponents would be hanging from the lamposts.

Couple that with my exposure of the fraud at work in the Courts (HMCTS) – the calling out of the various actors who claim to be judges and the dark freemasonic sorcerers who serve the inversion of truth at all levels, then you may see just why I have been so suppressed. I am like the lone nutter who wanders round an empty field sounding off about the various BS artists and controlled opposition groups whose platforms dwarf mine by infinite degrees of magnitude. This Rogue Rant from yesterday, 21st August, 2025, serves to illustrate the point that Reform UK, Advance UK and Restore Britain are each led by ‘former’ investment bankers, who never go near the subject of credit creation.

That said, as regular readers and viewers will know, I simply enjoy writing and discoursing on the pertinent topics that come to my attention and, as you may expect, I have no intention of stopping.

Those who are approved evidently have no such problems and one example of a so-called popular writer and podcaster is the character known as James Delingpole.

His Delingpod podcast continues to have a reach I can only dream of. Not that popularity can be used as the measure of a man or his work.

The son and brother of Freemasons, the expensively-educated Oxford graduate, who was once employed by the mainstream print media and was editor of Breibart, is something of a flibbertigibbit who enthusiastically plummets down a variety of rabbit holes, with all the gusto of a Jack Russell terrier, referring to himself as a red-pilled conspiracist who interviews a wide variety of guests.

Good for him, you might say but what if he is actually a state asset? After all, he is of the same cohort of graduates as Boris Johnson, David Cameron, George Gideon Osborne et al. He has stated that he was not recruited by Mi5 and groomed to be a national leader but I’m not buying it – the lady doth protest too much.

His long friendship with Lord Toby Daniel Moorsom Young, Baron Young of Acton – aka Toby Young – certainly rings a few bells. The pair of them had a weekly podcast, London Calling which, for a time, carried advertising for the services of a Leicester mortgage broker who was sponsoring the ‘show’.

Of all the rabbit holes he goes down, like so many of his ilk, James Delingpole never goes near the issue of the One Ring of financial control that holds the vast majority of the multitude in its thrall.

This avoidance is sometimes referred to as the Third Rail:

“The third rail of a nation’s politics is a metaphor for any issue so controversial that it is “charged” and “untouchable” to the extent that any politician or public official who dares to broach the subject will invariably suffer politically. The metaphor comes from the high-voltage third rail in some electric railway systems.

Touching a third rail can result in electrocution, so usage of the metaphor in political situations relates to the risk of “political suicide” that a person would face by raising certain taboo subjects or having points of view that are either censored, shunned or considered highly controversial or offensive to advocate or even mention.” Source

Could it be that James has been placed to corral those who are awakening to the pernicious nature of the construct in which they find themselves to be trapped? Is he what Wyvern the Terrible calls,

“The Joe Rogan of British podcasting”?

I would assert that is exactly what he is and that his output manifestly amounts to nothing more than a Limited Hangout.

After all, is it not the case that those, like him, who have sizeable followings are tolerated by the controllers as long as they avoid the more salient issues like the law, hidden history and the credit system?

To be popular on social media and in the ‘alternative scene’ one has to accommodate and maintain the current audience but is that audience truly conscious or have they been suckered into a cul-de-sac of empty rhetoric that nullifies their followers into passivity?

Is an audience that is drawn to conspiratorial narratives and the ‘rabbit holes’ that James frequently refers to really any different from the rest of the populace? Does that audience not have a limited perception that undermines their claims to be ‘awake’?

Is the ‘alternative scene’ truly different from the mainstream one?

Take for instance the issue of vaccination. The mainstream promotes it and the alternative scene denounces it.

Although a minority may point it out, few seem to be ready to acknowledge that the very premise of vaccination is utter nonsense. That premise is rarely considered and thus we have the mud-slinging that is exchanged between the two opposing camps which goes nowhere, just as it is intended to do.

Delingpole’s jolly schtick is nothing more than an echo chamber, that occasionally mocks his followers. By way of example, in his interview with Richard D Hall last year, the latter made mention of the recurrence of the number Twenty-Two in the referenced Manchester event, as well as how it features in other such psy-ops. This moment occurs in the 22nd minute of their dialogue. Did James edit it so that it appeared to be a coincidence, designed as a hint that the Freemasonic controllers are all-powerful and that their operations are thus works of genius?

The only interaction I have had with Mr Delingpole was when, last September, I published an essay on Rhetoric on the Substack platform, James shared it and reiterated my conclusion that Miri Finch’s article on the Richard D Hall court case was reliant on logical fallacies. Finch, of course, is someone who he has interviewd on a number of occasions and I would not trust her as far as I could throw her. The pair of them run round the rabbit runs like a pair of self-righteous bunnies.

Birds of a feather flock together – Finch and Delingpole – an echo chamber of empty rhetoric.

The curious thing was that shortly after the article was published and Delingpole had shared it, he then sent me a direct message, recanting his support of the piece, in which he glibly stated that Finch is “good”, that he would defend her honour and that I should stop giving her “shit”, otherwise he would be “very disappointed”.

Somewhat surprised at his volte face, I sent him this reply,

“Good morning, James and thank you for getting in touch.

Naturally, I will retract any post I have made that is inaccurate and, if necessary, issue an unreserved apology to the individual concerned.

Therefore, if you would be so kind, please inform Ms Finch that she has only to point out any errors in my reasoning and I will do just that.

However, please take note that I will not be moved by any fallacious appeals to emotion such as those contained in your rather bizarre direct message.

In fact, may I enquire as to what any of this has to do with you? Did you not appreciate the critique on Finch’s rhetoric to the point of sharing it?

In truth and honour, Michael”

The ensuing silence was deafening.

Looking back, I wonder what had motivated him to behave in such a way. The Bullfinch is fond of repeating her mantra that “If you know the name, they’re in the game.”

Unsurprisingly, she does not apply this tenet to James Delingpole, a man who is married to a member of the tiny hat family and who sent his son to Eton. Quite how, as a self-proclaimed alternative ‘truther’ he is able to fund his country manor and the school fees of his son is beyond my ken, unless, of course, he is indeed a salaried deep state operative who does not have to rely on donations and subscriptions.

It is also worth noting that he never goes anywhere near the subject of the ongoing invidious population replacement progrom that is being rolled out before our very eyes, even going so far as to state that the Southport murders were a false flag operation and that the Mohammedan gangs on our streets are state-sponsored actors.

Is all this a case of sour grapes? Not in the least. To reiterate: I am not here to gain praise or garner followers but I am allergic to bullshit and have a healthy suspicion of those who speak with plummy accents, lord it over others and ponce about like latter-day pied pipers.

My writings and discourses are to be assessed qualitatively – they stand or fall on the accuracy of the information and the reasoning contained therein and not the size of the audience. That, of course, means that I stand as the antithesis to each of the ex-investment bankers who front Reform UK, Restore Britain and Advance UK. Posh accents invariably gloss over vaccuity and none of those ever goes near the subject of money/credit creation, its control and its supply:

Meanwhile, James’ love of the shekels continues – each ‘Delingpod’ episode is introduced with an advertisement for a company that deals in gold and silver and whilst there is no problem with that per se, it is interesting to note that his much-trumpeted burrowing down and through a variety of rabbit holes always avoids the gaping tunnel of the financial control system, the matter of Law and the various legal traps in which we find ourselves. Would such a venture threaten his income stream? I don’t know but it is an interesting question nevertheless.

One thing for sure is that Delingpole has never been short of a few bob, just like Farage, Lowe and Habib and, consequently, that could be the reason why none of them go near the issue of the fraud of banking and, indeed, why no so-called ‘influencer’/soc media bigwig or conspiracy enthusiast ever goes near the subject of how it’s created, where it comes from and who controls it.

Cue the silence as I drop another pebble into the well of their vaccuity… so it goes, so it goes….

_________________________________________

Therefore, if you’re able, please consider taking out a paid subscription on Substack or donate via the Rogue Male Coffee Pot.

Until the next time, all the very best to you and yours and, remember, Fortune truly Favours the Brave.

Addendum: Whilst I cannot vouch for the veracity of this short YT video, “Is James Delingpole Encoding Masonic Numerology Into His Show?“, it does touch on some of the issues that I have aired in this essay – namely that Delingpole edited the interview so it appeared that Richard D Hall started speaking on the recurrence of the number 22 at the 22nd minute mark and it also posits that James’ brother, Dick, is a Freemason, as was their father. Consequently, some may take the view that there’s no smoke without fire…

August 23, 2025 2

Episode 68: The Glass Menagerie

The Alternative Media Menagerie

The danger of throwing pebbles in a glass house is a suitable metaphor for those fringe magnets who inhabit the snow dome that is the alternative media.

Menagerie noun
a collection of wild animals kept in captivity for exhibition.
a strange or diverse collection of people or things: some other specimen in the television menagerie.
ORIGIN
late 17th century: from French ménagerie, from ménage (see ménage).

Fringe magnets is a term invented by Dom Waterson of the Sheep Farm website and podcast and it means those popular public figures who fret about on the ‘alternative’ stage set of the ‘truth-seekers’. Unfortunately, the stage is populated by a menagerie of statists who are masquerading as free-thinkers.

The Curious Tale of Miri Finch

The menagerie is, of course a reference to the factual existence of financier-state sponsorship of those limited hangouts and agent provocateurs which and who exist in order to corral people into echo chambers where the truth and the facts are sidelined and the participants are led in a circular dance that never goes anywhere and never offers remedies, with the overall effect being to splinter the opposition and to sow doubt in the minds of the public. All of which is its purpose.

In the 1968 film, The News Benders the main character states that 92% of the population have no idea that the news is composed of fake events and falsities of all descriptions. The rest, he says, “work for us”.

The state asset, Marianna Spring is an example of a woman who, though she operates in the lame-stream sewers of the BBC Propaganda Pumping Station, throws around a heap of pebbles as she fact-checks the output of those that the military-industrial complex label conspiracy theorists. The hopeless irony being that she works within an organisation whose modus operandi is the production and dissemination of false narratives, inaccurate information, woke nonsense as well the employment of a plethora of nonces whose slimy trails score across the entire dung-heap of its fetid output.

Never, ever, does she fact check the disinformation that the corporation was created to spew into the minds of the unthinking masses and which it does on a daily basis. I would love to see her critique The News Benders as it is, perhaps a classic example of revelation of the method.

I have previously posited that James Delingpole is one of these types in so far as he has been set up precisely to engage in this type of operation. James loves the shekel, that is true, but is it unreasonable to suggest that he deliberately steers clear of discussing, in any real depth, the nature of the financial fraud and false money system we are having to negotiate as we journey through this shit parade of lies?

Miri Finch is a woman who writes articles on a variety of ‘conspiracy’ issues and she has a sizeable following on Substack. I previously critiqued her article in which claimed Richard D Hall is a deep-state asset and that the Manchester Arena False Flag of 2017 was part of an elaborate, even ingenious plan to curtail freedom of speech. My conclusion was that her writing is largely fallacious and full of airy nothings or empty rhetoric.

Her reliance on empty rhetoric was also clearly demonstrated on a recent podcast with Iain Davis in which she attempted to explain how and why she sees Hall as a state asset – this is from the opening segment to the podcast and is a direct quote of her explanation,

“there are people who believe, as is their right, that the bombing was real and that the victims were injured in that bomb in the way that they said they were and that’s those peoples’ beliefs and if these people have really been injured in the way that they say they have and you’re accusing them of faking, isn’t that completely unacceptable?

No, it’s not unacceptable at all, it’s totally acceptable and not just acceptable but the basis of the judicial system which assumes everyone is innocent until proven guilty. So, whenever you make an accusation of anyone, always the initial assumption is well they are innocent until there’s enough evidence to show either way. So, I said, yes of course, we must accuse potentially innocent people because how do we otherwise get to the truth. We don’t know what the truth is, that’s why (intelligible) … we’re making accusations, so, we’ll just have to go where the evidence takes us.

Erm, now, with, erm, particular people, Martin and Eve Hibbert, … I do think they are victims of something, I just don’t think it’s a bomb, erm, so if we just shut down the conversation, completely and say they’re victims, they’re disabled, they’re vulnerable so they’re beyond reproach, can’t ask any questions of them, then we’re never going to unravel what’s really going on. So, you know, whatever’s really happened to them, we have to risk making false accusations, have to risk being wrong, maybe, you know, apologise for being wrong, but that’s the only way to get to the truth.”

“I think they set up the counter narrative via Richard D Hall. The big red flag to me is the amount of media publicity he gets and it’s not just since [the trial]”

Now, Miri’s schtick and oft-repeated adage is, “if you know the name, they’re in the game.”

By which she means that anyone whose name appears in the media is a player in the mind-control and psy-ops which are perpetrated against the public.

Unfortunately, it is a rather simplistic and very fragile tag-line upon which to hang an ethos or any kind of logic or reasoning.

She states that Richard D Hall is in the ‘game’ because he has been referenced in the lamestream media over the Manchester Arena false flag and what his book revealed, then he must be an actor, whose modus operandi is all scripted and that he must be a security services asset. By that ‘reasoning’, the harassment he received at his market stall in Merthyr Tydfil by Mariana Spring and the subsequent BBC Panorama hit piece on him were all an act, created for the express purpose of demonising ‘conspiracy theorists’ and creating judicial precedents that all serve to curtail freedom of expression.

She is, if I have understood it correctly, claiming that the real controllers are always behind the scenes, anonymously directing the actors who take on the roles assigned to them in the geo-political realm. In this sense, she opines that Hall is a state asset or useful idiot.

If we follow this line of reasoning, then the Crown House of Rothschild is but a front-operation, even though it is a name that is not widely recognised. There is an element of truth in this as the World Crime Syndicate website substantiates.

For the purposes of this essay, let’s take it on face value and state that Miri is correct: that we only know or recognise the names of those who are deeply embedded in the never-ending game of hide and seek and that it is the unnamed controllers who hide in the shadows that are the real initiators of the oh-so-cunning movements of the chess pieces around the geo-political stage.

Now, let’s apply her adage to Mir-i-am herself.

She has stated on the Sheep Farm podcast that her father was employed at Keele University and that that is where she was brought up. But who is her father? How many of us have heard of him?

His name John Sloboda and he is a recipient of the Order of the British Empire and, thus, firmly one of the elite.

His OBE was ‘awarded’ for his service – a service into the uses of music in the realm of psychology, of its use as a tool of mind control.  This is what his Wikipedia entry states about him,

Is it not interesting to note that Sloboda was the Executive Director of the Oxford Research Group, of which it is stated,

“The Remote Warfare Programme was established in January 2018, based around the Remote Control project of the Network for Social Change, which had been hosted by ORG since 2013.

It analyses shifts in military engagements, focusing on Western states’ increasing focus on working through local and regional partner militaries in places such as the Middle East and Africa.

As part of this, they examine current developments in military technology and doctrine such as cyber-warfare, unmanned weapons systems (such as unmanned aerial vehicles), private military and security contractors, and special operations forces.” source

Note the link with the Network for Social Change and its involvement in

“cyber-warfare, private military and security contractors and special operations forces”

is it not the case that each and every cited example of these limited hangouts is engaging, perhaps not directly, but substantially in each of these areas?

Are any of these players to be trusted?

Does this mean Miriam’s father, John Sloboda, is in the game, as she likes to put it? Maybe. In any event, he is a bona fide member of the establishment on the simple basis he has been awarded an OBE for his service(s). I am also reminded at this point of another accurate and comical expression used by Dom of Sheep Farm, in reference to the family lineage of those who ponce about in various state-sponsored roles and whose families are firmly ‘established’ to the point where there is never any ordinary line of work to which they are associated,

No Plumbers Allowed

Incidentally, and for those who may be curious, neither Dom and Christian or myself are from establishment families; a suggestion which makes me chuckle as I write it and which is easily dispelled by the fact their father was a butcher and small-holder and mine was an engineer, both heralding from Huddersfield, where, interestingly, Miri Finch now resides.

The use of popular music as a mind control technique is well-documented and one only needs to listen to researchers like Mike Williams and read the work of Dave McGowan and Mark Devlin to see how sophisticated this Tavistock-based deployment of music as a psychological tool has been, with the Beatles being perhaps the finest example of its success.

There are numerous links to Sloboda’s work and whilst I have no interest in researching his academic papers, others may be inclined to do so.

If we are to apply Miri’s tenet then does it not follow that – because I have never previously heard of her father, who is a recipient of an OBE and other establishment accolades – that he may well be one of the psychological influencers/manipulators who exist in the shadows and control those ‘names’ she states being in the game?

And what of Miriam herself?

The link to Companies House suggests that she is also a player in the game. Quite how and why she has 3 separate (now dissolved) companies of which she was director is equally suggestive that she too is a player in the “game”.

It is interesting to note that in March, 2021 she joined a “consultant team” at a legal firm as “as a Legal Assistant (Non-Solicitor).”

“The Jonathan Lea Network is now a full service firm of solicitors that employs senior and junior solicitors, trainee solicitors, paralegals and administration staff who all work from a modern open plan office in Haywards Heath. This close-knit retained team is enhanced by a trusted network of specialist consultant solicitors who work remotely and, where relevant, combine seamlessly with the central team.” Source

Gven the fact that no paralegal (like Miri), solicitor, lawyer, attorney or member of the judiciary in the captured UK plc knows anything about the Law, it should come as no surprise that her ‘opinions’ on matters of Law are woolly and inaccurate as can be demonstrated by the above quotation from Iain Davis’ interview with her.

Acrylic Dressed Up as Wool.

Much of what she asserts is as woolly as her beanie (which is most likely acrylic),

“as a non-lawyer there can sometimes be limits to what I can achieve. However, now with the leverage of an established law firm I can work with, my contributions should have considerably more impact, and I’m very excited indeed about what the Jonathan Lea Network and I can achieve together.”

Empty rhetoric, which upon close inspection, amounts to the square root of fook all.

In any event, one does not take up a paid position at a legal firm without satisfying the employment criteria – they would not appoint her if there was any controversy or doubt about her being a loose cannon. She is evidently regarded as a ‘safe pair of hands’, as demonstrated by the firm’s endorsement of her and her appearances on Delingpole’s and Davis’ podcasts, as well as that of the other disinformation pedlar, Aisling (Whatshername).

Davis has appeared on these platforms and even interviewed Miri on his podcast. Why bother with either bint is my question – what purpose can be served by engaging with these women? Why not have me on to discuss the reasons why Judge Steyn’s order is lawfully VOID and what that actually means? Why piss about with a pair of lasses who are manifestly puffed up on their own empty rhetoric?

It is also worth considering what the game is that Iain Davis is playing. For instance, let us take the adage that signs and symbols rule the realm.

Davis’ logo is a strange one: the smiley face and this is very telling.

The inventor of the smiley face logo has made great financial gains from its prevalence.

Its usage began in the 1950s and was dominant in both the controlled hippy movement of the 1960s and the replay that was the acid house of the late 1980s.

There is also William Ramsay’s work on the phenomenon of the Smiley Face Killers.

Notice the blood through the eye – why would Davis choose it as his logo, given the negative associations it has with music and as a symbol for mind control?

The blood smear reminds me of the staged ‘assassination’ attempt on Trump, in which he rises up from behind the podium with a smear across his cheek. The fact that it was, going by the recurring shoe-motif, a freemasonic ritual of some nature may suggest that Davis’ intention behind choosing that particular symbol is also freemasonic in origin.

Delingpole also professes a fondness for the smiley face,

“he spent some time wearing smiley T-shirts and taking Ecstasy. “I think my Ecstasy chapter is one of the best bits of the book,” he says. He’s right. It’s lovingly nostalgic about the club scene during the late 1980s, as well as a savage indictment of it. He tells us about the “warm, beatific smiles” and the “beautiful faces radiating happiness” on the dance floor, as well as the “poo-scented tailwind of the swing doors” in the dreadful lavatories, and the terrible malaise when the drugs wear off.” source

I would also add that Davis has establishment connections too – Delingpole, UK (MI5) Column, and, “Iain’s work is regularly featured by a number of outlets including The OffGuardian, Lew Rockwell, Technocracy News & Trends and The Corbett Report.”

Each of which, I would posit, are establishment-controlled ‘alternative’ limited hangouts.

Whilst I may be wrong in regard to some of these assertions, I can reassure readers that I am not of their ilk. As stated, my dad was, for forty years, an engineer at David Brown Gears in Lockwood, Huddersfield and neither my paternal line (family name, Kaye) or my maternal line (family name, Thompson) contain any establishment lineage.

Thus, it can be safely said that I am not chucking stones around in a glass menagerie.

On the subject of establishment families, Delingpole was educated at the exclusive and expensive Malvern College and Oxford University and had a career in the mainstream media. His cosiness with Miriam, his glaring omissions on the fake financial system and his blatant connectedness with the establishment all point to him being an establishment-sanctioned ring-master in the interminable realm of the limited hangouts. After all, if we know the name, are they not in the game? And, does that not account for their large audiences?

This may well go some way to explaining how and why he jumped to the defence of Miriam after he had initially shared my article exposing her fallacies and empty rhetoric.

Remember too that each of these referenced commentators have thousands of followers on social media, that they have only recently come to the fore and that, by comparison, I have very few. To be elevated so quickly to such levels of attention is suspicious as we are in an electronic panopticon in which those who are genuine are not permitted to have large followings; their work is suppressed via censorship, the statistics are manipulated – the game is rigged and only the state-sanctioned players are ‘allowed’ audience access of the size these individuals have.

Whilst I get no pleasure of any kind as I write this and would prefer not to examine the grubby antics of these types, it is important to air these matters on the simple basis that the deceptions and frauds of these individuals need exposing.

As one commentator put it, it can be safely stated that I am not on Miriam’s Christmas card list. It is also fair to state that I will not be receiving an invitation to be a guest on the Delingpod.

As always, a huge thank you to Dave, Steve and David R for their generous appreciation of my discourses and essays. Should you be able, please chuck a few quid in the pot via the Buy Me a Coffee button and/or take out a subscription to my Substack pages. if you like, you can also support me by taking out a paid subscription which will grant you ‘first dibs’ on my output.
All the very best, Michael.

December 3, 2024 0

For a Few Shekels More

Taking the Shekel: ‘Red-Pilled’ Podcaster Pushes the Perpetuation of the Great British Mortgage Swindle.

Shekels are defined as,

shekel | ˈSHek(ə)l | noun the basic monetary unit of modern Israel, equal to 100 agorot.

• historical a silver coin and unit of weight used in ancient Israel and the Middle East.

• (shekels) informal money; wealth. ORIGIN from Hebrew šeqel, from šāqal ‘weigh’.

Given the fact that all UK mortgages are riddled with fraud and that the levels of deception are on a scale that more than matches those of the plandemic, why would any so-called red-pilled truther take money from a money-changer, licenced by the Crown/House of Rothschild?

The ‘Dead Pledge’ that is a ‘mort-gage’ is one element in a multi-layered financial scam; a thousand year old unconscionable tool for financial and state tyranny that was created by the ‘ingenious’ Jewish Money Changers as a means of ‘legally’ stealing people’s wealth:

“The Jews, whom the Normans brought to England . . . [or who financed and followed the invasion – Ed.] brought a refined system of commercial law: their own form of commerce and a system of rules to facilitate and govern it. . .

Several elements of historical Jewish legal practice have been integrated into the English legal system. Notable among these is the written credit agreement – shetar, or starr, as it appears in English documents.

The basis of the shetar, or “Jewish Gage,” was a lien on all property (including realty) that has been traced as a source of the modern mortgage. Under Jewish law, the shetar permitted a creditor to proceed against all the goods and land of the defaulting debtor. . .

Jewish law that debts could be recovered against a loan secured by “all property, movable and immovable” was a weapon of socio-economic change that tore the fabric of feudal society and established the power of liquid wealth in place of land holding. . . . Jewish Law, wherein personal debt superseded rights in real property had become the law of the land.”

Foootnote 11: H.C. Richardson, The English Jewry Under Angevin Kings 94 (1960) (Jews liquidation of land obligations broke down rigidity of feudal land tenure and facilitated transfer of land to new capitalist class).

Footnote 15: CF. 1 F. Pollock and F.W. Maitland, supra note 3 at 469… (alien to English law for creditor not in possession of land to have rights in it).

“The Shetar’s Effect on English Law”, The Georgetown Law Journal; V. 71, P 1179 – 1200); Judith A. Shapiro. SOURCE

The racket is blown apart in the documentary, The Great British Mortgage Swindle. If you have a mortgage and haven’t seen it yet, then I would recommend you do so.

One cannot claim to be ‘awoke’ to the machinations of the deep state without an understanding of the invidious workings of the financial controllers, aka the banksters and how it is a hive of deception and fraud. It is correct to state that Money and its creation is the one ring which controls it all.

The little hat money changers control it and, as a consequence, they are able to also control the media, the public institutions of law, health, education, entertainment and religion. It is an age-old game of usury, with those in charge able to plunder the people at will whilst simultaneously using its monopoly to control to the minds of the ‘public’.

Of course, anyone who claims to be knowledgeable or ‘awake’ to the deep state and its methodologies cannot truly be so without, at the very least, a basic understanding of this ring of control.

Imagine my surprise then when I was listening to an episode of the podcast, ’London Calling’ which features the voices of Toby Young and James Delingpole and, at 51’24 minutes in the latter reads out an advert for a certain Dan Gaskin owner of ‘Crest Mortgages’, evidently based in Leicester.

It proudly states that ‘Dan’ is a ‘fellow sceptic’, a ‘free thinker’, the ‘father of 6 children’, an ex Royal Navy ‘Warfare’ officer who has “driven ships (sic), supply companies and helps people with financial conundrums because he genuinely enjoys looking after people, nothing motivates Dan more than bringing fellow sceptics financial good cheer…”

At the end of the shekel-bought ad, James reads this,

We have to say this bit to be FCA compliant, Crest Mortgages is a trading style of Epiphany investments… Your house may be repossessed if you do not keep up with payments on your mortgage.”

The Crest website states,

We’re in the business of making home-purchasing dreams come true, and we do this by providing expert mortgage advice from Leicester to the entire UK.

People want quick, accurate answers to their questions. They need the best advice available so they can make good decisions about their future. That’s why I started Crest Mortgages.”

Toby Young runs the Daily Sceptic.

A sceptic is defined as

a person inclined to question or doubt all accepted opinions.
a person who doubts the truth of Christianity and other religions; an atheist or agnostic.

How can Mr Young be a sceptic whilst simultaneously promoting a company that engages in the continuation of the frauds of the Great British Mortgage Swindle?

The simple answer is he cannot. After all, “Fraud Vitiates All” which means that by promoting a fraud, regardless of your knowledge of it, you are complicit in it.

I would, therefore, politely suggest that James Delingpole and Toby Young wise up and ditch any and all associations with such a disingenuous proponent of financial enslavement and the shekel payments made by way of the ill-gained mortgage operations of Mr Dan Gaskin. After all, if one is a sceptic, as Toby purports to be, then all narratives are to be questioned and examined, particularly the financial one, just as if one claims, as James does, to be red-pilled and aware of the total inversion of the truth.

I’ll not be holding my breath.

A heartfelt thanks to this site’s benefactor, David R, for his ongoing support.

Should any reader and/or listener appreciate the work at RogueMale and wish to support me, please consider making a donation via the donate button or the ‘Buy Me a Coffee‘ link. Thank-you.

March 14, 2023 1

Subscribe For Latest RogueMale posts