In memoriam

A tribute to my dear friend, Jan, ‘the man’.

On Sunday, 8 days ago, I was stunned to learn of the untimely demise of a man who, though I have only known him these last 6 years, has been a great friend. Jan of the Bogusz family passed away on the morning of Thursday, 13 April, 2017. His cause of death is unknown for now but, as far as I know, the doctors at Lincoln hospital did confirm it was not his heart for that was beating strongly throughout those final hours.

Jan was born just over 61 years ago, in Lincoln, to a Polish father and a British mother. His paternal clan, of which he was justifiably proud, was Silesian in origin.

When I first met him in 2011, I looked into his twinkling clear blue eyes and immediately knew him to be a kindred spirit, a man who I knew implicitly I could trust. Jan was a man of vigour, robust in physique, with a bright, fierce intelligence and a generosity that shone through his every deed. Quite simply, he was ‘one of us’.

He lived in Lincoln all his life and worked as a highly regarded electrician, one of those men whose quality of work was never formally ‘advertised’. Rather, his good reputation was spread by word of mouth among those for whom he had worked.

On top? The late Jan Bogusz with his wife, Michell.

I cannot help but think his departure is too soon. He had just freed himself of the shackles of a void mortgage, he leaves behind his three children, three grandchildren and his mother, who has also outlived him. He was looking forward to starting afresh, with the intention of renovating a house for Natalie, his daughter, and himself.

When I last spent the day with him (in a matter at the County Court, Nottingham, the details of which I will write about when the time is right) and Tom Crawford, on 31 March, 2017, he was in fine fettle: brimming with energy, bright as a button, strong and vibrant, with the ever-present twinkle in his eyes. He left that evening, having shared a meal with us, we hugged and off he popped, back to Lincoln. Little did I know it would be the last time we would see each other.

He will be sorely missed, particularly by his family, but also by all those who knew him. A rogue male, of stout heart and quick mind, who did no harm and never took any shit, Jan’s support of the work at RM and the production of The Great British Mortgage Swindle, and the generosity of his spirit towards me, right from the beginning, was truly appreciated.

God bless you, brother. I am sure that I am not alone when I state your sudden passing has left a hole in my life, which is amplified by its unexpectedness.

Blessings to the Bogusz family at this most difficult of times.

Update: for those who may wish to attend, Jan’s funeral will take place on Wednesday, 17th May. It will start at 1.30pm, at St Mary Magdalene Church in the Bail, moving on to the cremotorium thereafter. A wake will be held at 3.15pm, at Huckleberry’s in Lincoln (where ‘Ye Olde Crown’ used to be).

April 24, 2017 6

Psychological Warfare and The ‘London Attack’ of 3/22

When false flags flutter, the truth is the first casualty.

Why are the people less happy?

An old friend of mine suggested yesterday that people, especially young people, are not as happy as they used to be. She cited how studies show people were happier in the 70s than they are now and how she remembered her own childhood of that time as being a happy one. I am inclined to agree with her. It is particularly notable that children appear unhappier than they were. As someone who grew up in the 1970s, I clearly remember how much more freedom children had. There was less television to watch, no electronic and/or other computer devices to be glued to and even though we were ‘schooled’, the institutions were not surrounded by 7ft high steel fences, the corridors did not have CCTV and there was no national curriculum being imposed on us.

Furthermore, we actually spent as much time outside as we could – on returning from school, one would slip out of the grey uniform and into one’s ‘playing out’ clothes, often muddied from the previous day, to go and meet up with friends to ride bikes, play endless games of cricket and football, hide and seek, den-building and general ‘laking out’ as it was termed in the local vernacular of the West Riding.

Am I being overly nostalgic? No. These were the times when children made their own entertainment and, although we would be called in by our mothers when dusk came or tea was ready, we were left unsupervised, unhindered and free to do as we wished, providing of course, we were not harming anyone else.

Little wonder we were happy – the neighbourhood was our world and it was our playground or, quite often, our training ground for life and, schooling aside, we had the freedom to explore it. I do not look back fondly at my incarceration in the local state indoctrination centres, and those teachers who imposed their rules on me from the ages of 4 to 18 were hardly paragons of free thinking and virtuosity who had our best interests at heart (school was often a violent place, with random acts of aggression perpetrated by teachers and children alike), but there were opportunities every day to live a life outside of its confines. It was also a lot easier to play truant in those days than it is now and, of course, there was no requirement to stay on til the age of 18 (though I did choose to). Neither am I stating that our childhoods were idyllic, merely emphasising that there were more gaps in the matrix of adult control to explore or escape through than there are now.

I would argue that the matrix of control has been ramped up over the last 16 years – since the events of 9/11, which signalled all manner of ‘security’ measures being wheeled out.

The whole amounts to nothing less than a psychological operation on the consciousness of mankind, the effects of which have trickled down into the childhoods of the young. In other words, there is good reason why people are not as happy as they once were. We were not born into this world to live lives that are limited, to suffer state-programming in incarceration centres (schools) that only ‘teach’ us what to think, not how.

The levels of psychological manipulation are so dominant these days that they form a panopticon of the mind (as is the intention behind them). People are so engrossed with and in the mobile devices and their content that their minds are seemingly unable to focus on the world around them with any degree of critical thinking.

Furthermore, due to their schooling, the pollutants of the environment, fluoride in their drinks, mass vaccinations, the control of the country’s credit creation by private House of Rothschild financiers, the deceptive practise of birth registration, the kleptocracy of the state, the never-ending wars, their miseducations and the relentless mass propaganda exercises they are subjected to, they are frequently incapable of seeing through the lies and distortions that are perpetrated against them on an hourly basis.

Said lies and distortions are invariably pumped out into the consciousness of humanity via the usual fake news outlets who are fed the storylines via the Rothschild-controlled fake news agencies like Reuters and Associated Press. They are swallowed hook, line and sinker by those false ‘journalists’ who merely repeat what they fed.

Thus, when an event occurs like the previous week’s ‘London Attack’, the cogs in the propaganda machinery begin to turn, instantly churning out an official narrative which, upon critical examination, does not add up to the some of its parts. Incoherency dominates, with the cut and paste methodology serving only to pour oil on the flames of the psychological manipulation emanating therefrom. The truth is indeed the first casualty in a war on the psyche of the people.

A cursory examination of the narrative reveals there is a number of anomalies concerning the ‘London Attack’ that will lead the discerning critically thinking individual to conclude that, on the balance of probabilities, the event was staged. That sentence may well cause outrage in the mind of any one who has simply swallowed the narrative with no consideration as to how it has been scripted. Staged events, by their very existence, are scripted. The world is a stage – the question is, as this site has posed on many occasions, who is writing the script(s)?

Psychological warfare is nothing new. Scripted events, like false flags have been part of the history of this warfare for hundreds of years. Off the top of my head, those that have been scripted include the so-called Gunpowder Plot the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, the sinking of the Lusitania, the Gulf of Tonkin incident that lead to the US war with Vietnam, and, the mother of them all, the 9/11 ‘attack’ on the Twin Towers.

Anyone who believes that false flags do not happen, that there is no reason for them or that no one benefits from them would do well to look into Operation Gladio whereby controlled opposition groups, or ‘terrorist cells’ were created after WW2 in order to foment events across Europe that would lead to greater controls being imposed on the populace by the very same ‘shadow’ governments, financiers and/or ‘security’ operations that were responsible for the mass slaughters of the 20th Century.

Without limitation, the anomalies of the 3/22 attack that have come to one’s attention are:

The fact that there was a training drill taking place prior to the events, as confirmed by this young man
The date and its connection to the Skull and Bones society and Freemasonic numbering “The date 3/22 (322) is not only the emblem of America’s leading CIA-Freemasonic elite group, Skull and Bones. 3/22 is also the culmination of the three-day Satanic Feast of Pelusia, consisting of – get this – “the invocation of Isis.”
The arrival on Parliament Square of a red Freemasonic helicopter:
The curious incident of the purportedly Romanian woman who jumped into the Thames after the car had passed her by, the footage of which shows some chord or other, possibly a bungee jump rope, to which she was attached, all of which is shot from a distance, indicating different weather conditions from the day in question. Was it even a woman? The splash might suggest otherwise.
The fact that it is claimed that between 40 and 50 people were injured when the purported attacker’s car mounted the curb and the fact that none of the photographs and footage appears to show any such number of casualties.
The ‘great shoe mystery’ whereby the purported victims’ shoes had come off in the melee, to be neatly placed nearby.
The ‘lone wolf’ status of the alleged attacker, and the possibility of him being an asset of the security services.
The appearance on the scene of Tommy Robinson, the self confessed “jewish” “zionist” in the presence of the Zionist organisation, ‘Rebel Media’, suggesting he and they had knowledge in advance of the alleged incident.
The Go Fund Me account set up within hours on behalf of the alleged American victim of the attack.
The curious actions of Tobias Ellwood, an American Tory MP with background work in the secret services and how the by-standing paramedics and doctors allowed him to perform the CPR resuscitation on the policeman (who was possibly killed via some bizarre ritual murder) rather than themselves and the inexplicable smearing of his forehead with a streak of blood thereafter.
The immediate labelling it as a ‘Terrorist incident’ by the possible Mi5 agent known as Theresa May, without any investigation into what might have happened.
Westminster Council turned off the CCTV last year. Why might that be?
How despite the imposition of draconian ‘security’ measures, tapping phone calls, collecting private emails, extra powers of investigation, no one knew what was going on? As Jon Rappoport writes, “Wherever you see the Surveillance State, you see technocracy. The claim that surveillance is being utilized to prevent terror attacks is a cover story. In fact, there can be no all-embracing technocracy without real-time tracking of every citizen’s energy consumption.” source
The curious incident of the Mannequin under the bus wheel (again, without shoes): and the likelihood of another being used at the roadside for purposes of the aforementioned drill that was taking place prior to the alleged attack.
How Channel 4 misreported the name of the alleged attacker, only for his lawyer to confirm that he is currently in prison.
The stock of photographs conveniently provided by ‘official’ photographers (Stefan Rousseau and Toby Melville) of the state’s actors like the ‘Royals’ and ‘Parliamentarians’ – video by ‘Annie Logical’.

None of it adds up to a coherent narrative.

It is curious to note also that the staged event was predicted:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u9QfC3u14YA

As ever, the question that is left hanging in the air is Cui Bono?

Possible Beneficiaries

The fake state.
The hidden controllers like the Tri Lateral Commission and all those who wish to foment civil war, possibly between muslims and indigenous peoples or the continued manipulation of the false left-right divide;
Those who operate a divide and rule strategy.
Those who wish to keep the populace within a mental panopticon , wherein the fear of being under attack is greater than the actual manifestation of one and thus the population are easy to control, guided into total acceptance of whatever increased ‘security’ measures are deemed necessary.
Those who wish for increased powers of the police state. Afterword: sure enough, on the back of this a headline duly appeared on 24 March in the ‘Evening Standard,

“Scotland Yard to rush through £11m spend on guns to protect London from terror attacks”
Those seeking further excuses for censorship

Meanwhile, we have the division caused by the fake left and right, both of whom swallow the official narrative because it suits their agendas. The right take it as proof that we are too tolerant – that Enoch Powell was correct, that these ‘barbarian invaders’ should be deported and tougher immigration laws are needed. Whilst the left accept the narrative as proof that the people are somehow ‘not tolerant enough’ and if we were only more supportive of our muslim populations, more inclusive, then none of this would occur. Both are also conveniently and complacently overlooking the fact that many muslim groups are not religious organisations but cells funded and controlled by the security services such as Mi5.

Also worthy of consideration is the fact that the alleged targets of these attacks (in this case, ‘parliamentarians’) are always left unscathed, with the actual victims, when there are any, being members of the public or, as may have been the case here, members of the police or military, any of whom may have been killed as part of some nefarious ritual. If a genuine Islamic jihadist wanted to blow up a ‘Parliamentarian’, why would he not succeed? After all, it’s not difficult to get close to the MPs:

Theresa May, possible Mi5 agent, with some men who may or may not be wearing nightshirts.

– and certainly not impossible for a genuine assassin to hide some kind of lethal explosive up his kaftan or his orifice ready for detonation.

Why would a genuine suicide bomber not take a leaf out of the assassination of Prime Minister Spencer Perceval?

As ever, and just like the other staged events, we are always left with more questions than answers, questions that are never touched by the fake news outlets and their woefully ill-equipped ‘journalists’.

Little wonder, therefore, that in times like the ones we are living through, levels of happiness among the young are not as high as they once were. As one ages, there is thus little regret that I had not been born later – without my childhood, I would have little cognisance nor appreciation of what sovereignty truly means, nor understanding of what individual freedom consists of.

In any event, these staged events amount to nothing less than psychological warfare, being raged on and against the indigenous populations and, as such, may be taken as clear evidence that there are traitors in our midst, enemies of the people with scant regard for noble concepts like peace, individual sovereignty and western philosophy, freedom and the rights of man.

Conclusion.

It is not unreasonable to take the view that, given the historical factual occurrences of false flag/staged events committed by the varous alphabet agencies of government down the years and across the world, this was another staged event. Engineered to trigger fear, from which the public expect, or even call for ‘security’ to be ramped up, it serves the dual purpose of psychological manipulation and the ramping up of further draconian powers of the state. The effect being to demoralise the people thus making them feel more helpless and leaving them easier to manipulate.

Easier to manipulate if they swallow the official narratives from the fake news outlets, that is. As ever, the individual is encouraged to complete his own research and exercise his critical thinking skills in order to blow apart any and all attempts at psychological and spiritual manipulation. In short:

Keep ‘em peeled and use your common sense.

Afterword: it is interesting to note also that a number of so-called ‘alternative media’ operatives, like Paul Joseph Watson (of InfoWars), Stephan Molyneux and Red Ice Radio, all seem to swallow and promote the official line, i.e the one that the mainstream media feeds the populace. Have they never heard of false flags? Do they have no historical knowledge of staged events? Do they not do any research? Or are they, perchance, paid agents of the Military industrial complex whose aim is to create division?

___________________________________

Acknowledgements: once again, a special thank you to David R, Stephen K, Jan B and Brian V for their kind donations and sponsorship of this site. All greatly appreciated!

As ever, any one who wishes to show their support and appreciation of the work at RogueMale is invited to do so via the donate button. Thank you.

April 1, 2017 6

THE BANKING CON – A STARK REMINDER

The Immorality of Banking – a plain tale

Of Old King Coal, fake LOBO loans and illusory debt, exposed to the bones.

I have written many times about the fraudulent nature of the banking system; I have even fallen prey to its genocidal ways and co-produced a film about it, TGBMS. I’m not going to stop writing about it either, so long as it is necessary to expose its immoral machinations for what they are.

Money and its creation is the world’s biggest religion. It holds everyone in thrall. It is a racket that permeates every aspect of our lives, no matter which level of so-called society we find ourselves at.

As Michael of Bernicia states in the trailer to the aforementioned film,

‘What would you do if you knew that every bank loan was a complete and utter fraud? That the banking industry is a huge con?”

Some might, quite understandably, take the view that he who has been tricked deserves to be tricked. After all, if he was unable to see through the con trick at the time it was played, then more fool he. Were we not warned via the programming of the brand known as Shakespeare, to be wary of usury and Jewish money lenders (The Merchant of Venice)? Was it not laid out clearly to us in Hamlet? –

Neither a borrower nor a lender be,

For loan oft loses both itself and friend,

And borrowing dulls the edge of husbandry.

Hamlet Act 1, scene 3, 75–77

And what of Jesus overturning the money-changers’ tables in the temple?

When everyone and everything is in hock to the banksters, one cannot help but think, how did it get to this? The history of banking, its use of fiat currencies, of usury and the hidden practices of credit creation via the honourable promise to pay are there to be explored by the critical thinker and it behoves him to do so at the earliest opportunity.

How and why so many fail to understand the fraud that is committed by the banks every minute of every day is a question which can be answered by a brief examination of the state’s deliberate policy of dumbing down the population via its programme of mass schooling. Notice I state schooling and not education, which is something completely different.

Schools exist not to liberate the individual and inspire him to become whatever he so chooses to be but, rather, have been created to deliberately dumb down the people into a collective mass of stupidity which neither knows of nor cares to understand the matrix of deceit that has been constructed around it. Standardised tests measure the ability to regurgitate information – it is the Frankfurt School of thought whereby shit in equals shit out. The masses are effectively dumbed down and those who can parrot, without question, the information they have been fed are rewarded with the jobs in ‘human resource’ organisation and other low grade service sector positions of management. They are paid according to how well they tow the line. They are not paid to think:

“Mass dumbness is vital to modern society. The dumb person is wonderfully flexible clay for psychological shaping by market research, government policymakers; public-opinion leaders, and any other interest group. The more pre-thought thoughts a person has memorized, the easier it is to predict what choices he or she will make. What dumb people cannot do is think for themselves or ever be alone for very long without feeling crazy. That is the whole point of national forced schooling; we aren’t supposed to be able to think for ourselves because independent thinking gets in the way of “professional” think-ing, which is believed to follow rules of scientific precision.” John Taylor Gatto, The Tyranny Of Compulsory Schooling

Few of us escape this tyranny and its effectiveness is amply demonstrated by those who are most supplicant to the collectivist mindset: politicians of all hues.

Politicians are not only incapable of thinking and acting outside the fake paradigms of the state, they are jointly and singularly, notoriously self-serving. It doesn’t take much research to demonstrate that fact.

Yet the pretence that they are there to serve the people continues to linger.

It is their self-serving egoic modus operandi that leaves them wide open for manipulation by the deep government that controls the puppet show commonly known as politics, a theatre where ego abounds and honour is dead.

Can we imagine how things might be if those who work in the political field actually did so with the interests of the people at heart, rather than the promotion of state-corporate-collectivist agendas? A collection of individuals who were not subject to the fake left-right paradigms?

Whilst I remain dubious of any politician and his intentions, I was pleasantly surprised by Donald Trump’s support of the coal miners, which can be read about here.

Imagine if a British leader came forward like Trump and announced legislation that brought back the mining industry and its associated industry?

“It is time to acknowledge that the decision to close the coal mines was a catastrophe for the people of this nation. Communities were destroyed, families torn apart and the nation’s independence was compromised to such an extent that we now have foreign companies purportedly owning much of the country’s power industry. It is time to reverse that. The rich coal seams that exist across the lands and off shore will be reopened and an associated power generation scheme will mean the establishment of efficient, non-polluting energy.

In the meantime, we will also be funding alternative sources of generating electricity via Tesla technology and over-unity devices that will serve to resurrect the latent steel and engineering industries, which have similarly suffered over the last 5 decades.

Engineering will once more come to the fore in the isles of Britain, after all, we have a rich history of invention and innovation. The government will no longer be taking up fake loans from the usual coterie of Rothschild dominated banks. Instead, the Great British Pound will be printed by the treasury, free and clear of usury, which is to be outlawed in accordance with the ancient laws of these lands. Community banks will be established and special funds created for the commencement and revival of these industrial initiatives. No longer will we be held to ransom by the private interests of the Bank of England and its associated licenced minions in the credit industry.”

Could you imagine the stooge May doing it? Or even the Fabian puppet Corbyn? Would that happen under the current political regime?

Not a chance.

And yet, the coal reserves underground and off-shore around |the British Isles remain substantial enough to reestablish the self-sufficiency in power production that was until only recently a hallmark of these lands.

“There are vast coal resources beneath parts of Yorkshire, Nottinghamshire, Lincolnshire and NE Leicestershire (henceforth referred to as the Yorkshire-Nottinghamshire Coalfield). This coalfield has been extensively and intensively exploited for hundreds of years, particularly since the industrial revolution. Over 400 collieries were open at its peak in the late 19th and early part of the 20th Century. Over the centuries mining has gradually advanced to the east, exploiting progressively deeper seams. Nottinghamshire’s pits were some of the deepest in the country. For example, Bevercotes (opened in the 1960s but now closed) and Harworth have shafts more than 1000 m deep.” source

Following the brutal destruction of the coal mining industry by the Thatcher government, the country is left in the ridiculous position whereby,

“Currently 40% of the electricity we use is generated from coal-fired power stations and UK Coal supplies the fuel that makes 4% of the country’s electricity. This means that 70% of the coal used to generate the nation’s energy is imported from places such as Russia, America and Colombia.” source

So, a country that was self-sufficient in coal just a generation ago is now dependent upon imports simply because a draconian government fraudulently auctioned off the industry to the carpet baggers? Is that not an extreme state of affairs?

Indeed, we currently live in an extreme state, where ‘Benefit fraud’ leads to jail. But banking fraud? Where does that lead? Usually, a cover up or a slap on the wrist fine for whichever bank has been caught operating fraudulently, wth the proceeds ending up who knows where, but most likely in her Maj’s Treasury. That is extremism personified.

“In 2009, James Crosby admitted that HBOS had engaged in High Risk lending and putting client funds at risk – and the SFO reported “over $200 million still missing and unaccounted for” in their Press release in 2008 – huge moneys,still not found! This is demonstrably because of Fraud at the Board level of HBOS PLC (James Crosby was the FCA’s deputy chairman at the material time engaging in insider dealing it appears, and pulling strings – with no punishment for these gross violations of Public trust).” E Watson.

Anyone who does not believe the banks are effectively acting as the deep state would do well to note this:

“Brzezinski, co-founder of the Trilateral Commission and David Rockefeller’s intellectual flunkey: “The nation state as a fundamental unit of man’s organised life has ceased to be the principal creative force: International banks and multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation-state.”

For now, at least, the banks are running it. The Great British Mortgage Swindle is an example of how the banks steal money via the very homes we live in and the LOBO loans taken out by many councils from c. 2003 to 2012 are another stark example.

Lender option borrower option or lender’s option borrower’s option (LOBO) is a long term borrowing instrument available in the United Kingdom. They involve periodic interest re-fixings, which incorporates two linked options:

lender’s option: option for the lender to set revised (usually higher) interest rates at predetermined interest reset dates such as annually.

borrower’s option: linked option for the borrower (exercisable only if the lender’s option is exercised) to pay the revised interest rate or to redeem the bond although that may involve exit fees.

They are provided by banks and the loan contract runs for between 40 and 70 years. There is no regulatory body responsible for overseeing their use … Campaign group Debt Resistance UK researched LOBOs using the Freedom of Information Act.Banks, such as Barclays and Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS), provide LOBO loans to about 240 UK councils (63% of all councils in 2013) with a total value of £15 billion. Out of this £15 billion it is estimated that about £1 billion in upfront profits was made by the lenders. LOBOs are currently almost a fifth of all council borrowing.

LOBOs were recommended to councils by specialist financial advisers who, unknown to the council, were in turn paid commission by the banks providing the LOBOs.

At least 12 councils have the most expensive types of LOBO loan. Most of these have “inverse floaters” taken out with RBS – interest rates for the loan are increased if general bank lending rates decrease.

As a direct consequence of making repayments on LOBOs, councils have had to make major cuts in services to their residents. It has been calculated that if councils were free to relinquish their LOBO contracts at no penalty and instead borrow at a more typical market rate it would save them about £145 million for 2015 alone. Some councils are considering taking legal action. source

For instance, take Kirklees Council in West Yorkshire: this comment from the local newspaper summarises it neatly:

“Kirklees have L.O.B.O loans for £500 million to be repaid in the future, you are paying £4 million a year interest, you seem reluctant to mention this. I suggest everybody googles lobo loans and and Kirklees liability it makes interesting reading.” source

Interest payments on the purported loans are taken to service the debt directly from the people via unlawful council tax. A fake debt at that. Just like a mortgage. No consideration by the banks. No disclosure as to how the credit is created and disguised as a ‘loan’.

Little wonder said council has just added 10% to its council tax bills. The politicians who took out the loans have fecked up and the ‘tax payer’ is footing the ever rising ‘bill’:

“Hear Hear I have tried to get the Kirklees L.O.B.O. loans mentioned in the Examiner in the past but the subject seems to be taboo, but they are one of the main reasons why Kirklees is in such dire financial straits, with massive interest repayments and no accounting for what these loans were used for!”

“Well said David, my estimate of £500m is on the conservative side for 30yrs interest, couple this with £500m unsecured pension liabilities and Kirklees has a future deficit of 1Trillion. Perhaps unqualified Sheard and Turner would care to comment?” source

Read more on LOBO loan swindle here and here.

These LOBO loans are widespread:

“Newham council, Labour 60 / 60, took out 27 loans at a face value of £563m which now cost £959m. Sir Robert Andrew “Robin” Wales is Mayor on £80,029 / year and oversaw a £111m project to relocate council offices, including £18.7m of design and refurbishment costs.”

Update: “Britain’s most enthusiastic council for taking out Lobo loans, Newham, has ditched the scheme saving up to £100 million.

Newham has agreed with its lender, thought to be Barclays, to overhaul £248.5 million of Lobo loans — an acronym for lender option borrower option — and move to traditional fixed-rate borrowing.

It will save £1.6 million a year over an almost 60-year period, or £94 million in total.” source

The bottom line? If one borrows something, then one has to give it back. Whether it be a lawn mower, a hole punch or someone’s pet chimp, it has to be returned to its owner. Simple.

The councils who took out these false loans have had to make massive cutbacks in public services just to keep up on the interest payments – repayments can run for 40 to 70 years.

It is yet another massive swindle.

The corollary of this is plain. Did you borrow anything? If not, then you are under no moral obligation to ‘pay it back’. How could you be?

It is a question of morality. How much fecking clearer can it get?

If no actual loan takes place, then how can you pay it back? And that point applies to councils and companies just as much as it applies to individuals. The LOBO loans have lead to cut backs in museum and library services, to name but two in Kirklees alone. And all because the fake loans and their criminal interest rates have to be ‘serviced’.

Says who? Do they really have to serviced?

Someone with balls would do well to demand that the usual suspects, Barclays and Royal Bank Scotland actually prove they made a loan from their own coffers and that the credit extension was not simply created via a few strokes on a computer keyboard. All loans are created out of thin air!

If it is simply an extension of credit, facilitated by the administrative procedures of the bank, then from where does the moral obligation come to ‘pay it back’? Nothing has been loaned. No deposits, bank or customers – the loan has been created out of nothing. It is merely a conjuring trick.

The Icelandic peoples demonstrated what happens when the banksters are told, in no uncertain terms, to feck off with their fake debts. When will a British Council do the same? The game is up and it is surely only a matter of time before the whole rotten edifice of the banking racket crumbles and falls away.

FOOTNOTES

Britain’s considerable coal reserves:

http://www.nmrs.org.uk/mines-map/coal-mining-in-the-british-isles/

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2593032/Coal-fuel-UK-centuries-Vast-deposits-totalling-23trillion-tonnes-North-Sea.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/energy/10885210/Scotland-sitting-on-vast-coal-reserves-miner-says.html

Acknowledgements: thanks to Steve K for his kind donation and, as ever, David R for his continued support of the work at RogueMale.

Anyone wishing to show his appreciation of the site is encouraged to do so via the Paypal link. Many thanks.

March 1, 2017 1

REVERSE ENGINEERING AND EMPTY RHETORIC

The world is divinely engineered, nihilism and the ‘Big Bang’ merely science fiction.

Check out the rhetoric: how critical thinking is the essential tool of freedom.

In loving memory of my father, Peter, who passed away, aged 79, on 22 January, 2017.

After a long neurological illness, my dad departed this mortal coil at 2.40pm last Sunday, with his wife of 58 years, his son and son-in-law at his bedside.

As I witnessed his last breath, my heart opened with what I can only describe as immense gratitude, a deep sense of connectedness and love for a man who had always insisted, from my early years, the importance of exercising

“the common sense that you were born with”.

An engineer, Peter left school at 15, became a projectionist at the Odeon cinema in Blackpool, before completing his 2 years national service at Catterick, North Yorkshire (where he also operated the camp’s 35mm projectors at its own cinema). In 1958, he began working at David Brown Gears in Huddersfield as a profile grinder, a place where my grandfather, Tom, had worked before him.

He went on to work there for 43 years before retiring in 2001.

Like many of his generation, he was not subjected to what now mistakenly passes for an ‘education system’. He was capable of seeing things clearly and, to my knowledge, no one (other than the usual statist entities of the Crown House of Rothschild) ever got the better of him. Whilst he was not always accurately informed, he spoke his mind and stated things as he saw them. He caused no harm to others and took no shit. People knew where they stood with him and he was, in the clearest sense of the term, a ‘good man’. Such a man, I would posit, is a fine example to any younger man who is paying sufficient attention. He had common sense in abundance, a mind that was capable of sifting the wheat from the chaff and he was a man who laughed regularly at the comedic nature of the people and the world around him. Moreover, he was always there for his family and for me.

Independent to his core, my father was a man who could turn his hand to anything: from bricklaying to building fireplaces to rewiring the house, to plumbing, to woodworking, to fixing and servicing the car, home-brewing, amateur operatics, he played (field) hockey until he was 54 and, up until his illness, was often to be seen out walking when others would choose to travel by car. Simply put, he was able to work things out, to see instantly how stuff worked and, as such, he was a man who was able to see through bullshit. He was not a man given to tears: the only occasions I recall being when he wept with hilarity (he had a great sense of humour, right up until the end) and, back in September, 1999, when he broke down crying as I left the house to go on a 16 month sojourn to India.

For years I did not truly understand how and why my departure had caused him to weep. Now I do, for the realisation has arisen within me these last few days that we are more inextricably connected to one another than we realise, often when it is very late. His cousin, Madeline stated to me the other day, “Blood is thicker than water, Michael” and it’s a maxim that now shines with crystal clarity.

Much of the bullshit we have to deal with is rhetorical:

Rhetoric|ˈredərik|

the art of effective or persuasive speaking or writing, especially the use of figures of speech and other compositional techniques.”

However, for rhetoric to be accurate and not misleading, it has to be founded on sound grammar (information) and reasoned thought (logic).

Of course, rhetoric need not be truthful and one only has to look at the premise of the double-speak of politicians and advertisers for illustrations of that. It is fair to state we are bombarded from all angles by fake rhetoric, often pushed out by the fake news outlets such as the BBC and the Guardian, CNN, Fox, Reuters being just a few examples.

Rhetoric is used to deceive, to persuade and to manipulate – emotionally, psychologically and socially. This is why memes can be so effective.

The individual can choose to switch off from it entirely by refusing to listen and watch any of the MSM. That is not to state, however, that the so-called ‘alternative’ information outlets are not engaging in promulgating fake rhetoric themselves, whether knowingly or otherwise.

In the current world of mass media and manipulation of all kinds, the individual will only be able to navigate his way through his life if he has developed the skills and ability to think critically. One way to do so is to learn the 3 ways of the Trivium. This is a practical template for him to develop further his latent powers to make sense of the world around him, to see through the lies of those who would seek to control, influence or persuade him of things that are untrue or fill him with erroneous beliefs that only benefit those who are seeking to gain from his naivety.

The state (Empire), the banksters and associated fake ‘financiers’, the puppet politicians, the pharmaceutical industry, the schooling system, advertisers and associated sellers of ‘snake oil’ all want to control him through his mental processing and the theft of his energy (via taxation, fake debt, false pharmaceutical ‘remedies’ and usury).

‘Empty Rhetoric’

When the facts and logic break down, the result is invariably non-sensical. To work out whether the rhetoric is true in its content, or merely empty, as it’s backed by nothing of substance, one simply needs to reverse engineer it.

In other words, work through the grammar and the logic from which it has been created. Learn what logical fallacies are and train your thinking to spot them when they occur.

Take the following, for instance, which was on a banner being carried by a bald-headed ‘mangina’ at a women’s march in London last weekend, a placard that someone, possibly the carrier himself, had gone to the time and expense of making and ask yourself is it built on fallacy or is the grammar and reasoning sound?

Empty rhetoric: “No uterus, no opinion.”

Grammar: uterus |ˈyo͞odərəs|

noun (pl. uteri |ˈyo͞otəˌrī, -ˌrē| )

the organ in the lower body of a woman or female mammal where offspring are conceived and in which they gestate before birth; the womb.

opinion |əˈpinyən|

noun

a view or judgment formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge: I’m writing to voice my opinion on an issue of great importance | that, in my opinion, is dead right.

So, the message is if you are not a woman, then you cannot have an opinion.

When one asks ‘why’ that might be so, it all falls apart as there is no reason why one has to be a woman to have an opinion.

There is no information to suggest that only women have opinions.

It is a logical fallacy – an appeal to the emotions, or even to the absurd. Maybe he is taking the piss? Or even hoping to pull some feminista chick at the march?

In any event, being based on poor grammar and grounded in the illogical, it is a classic example of empty rhetoric.

Of course, it is an entirely transparent device but serves as a fine example, amongst many, of the empty rhetoric that is pumped out by many a SJW and feminista and those on the fake ‘left’ of the false political spectrum with phoney agendas to promote, the thinking behind which has been carried out by others whose only aim is manipulate, divide and rule or steal from. Many such groups and marches like this being funded by the discreditable ‘Soros Foundation’.

A more sophisticated example of empty rhetoric may be found in the nihilistic belief that life is meaningless, a completely random series of events that have happened by accident, all originating from a ‘big bang’ that occurred in the nothingness of ‘space’ and from which all life has evolved.

Nothing can come from nothing. To suggest otherwise is faulty reasoning. It is plain to state that Nature is a form of engineering – a divine engineering that has created all that is. Given the world around us, of which Man is a part, has been crafted by a creative power that is beyond our understanding, the engineer of which may or may not be termed ‘God’, we too have been divinely created by one whom we can never know or truly comprehend.

However, just because we cannot comprehend it, does not mean that it does not exist.

Whether one bores down into the microcosmic or zooms out to the macro, it is clear that all of it is a marvellous creation.

My father has, at least for now, returned to whence he came. Life is a glittering paradox and the world is the stage on which we each play our roles; a shimmering splendid creation, a sometimes seemingly incomprehensible platform of order and chaos, onto which we enter and exit. We pop in to the world, inhaling our first breath, and eventually we pop off, exhaling our final breath. It is resplendent with as much meaning and meaninglessness as we perceive, empty and full, triumphal and defeating, each to our parts. Singularly one, yet always connected – to those who are here and those that have departed.

By way of heartfelt appreciation, I salute too the great ancestral lineage from which my father emerged, a recent incarnation of a long, long line stretching down the millennia. It remains an epic interwoven strand of dna and spirit, the abundant qualities of which shone through my dad.

Who or whatever the divine creator behind it all is, Nature and Life, in all its aspects is an ineffable work of engineering.

Peter, the engineer, David Brown Gears, c. 1965

In any event, my, dad who engineered gigantic, precise and ingenious gearing mechanisms out of steel (see above), was a wonderful force of nature who, at least as far as I am concerned, will be dearly missed. As the beloved so eloquently put it,

“May his journey back to source be illuminated by the lights of a thousand angels! We will keep the memory of his playful sense of humour and the strength of his soul. God bless Peter.”

Much love to all, but particularly, at this time, to my mother, my sister, niece, brother-in-law and, of course, my beloved.

Finally, here is the Gracie Fields song he requested be played at the end of his funeral: a fond farewell indeed.

A special thank you to Jamie U for his kind donation and, particularly, David R for his generous sponsorship of the work at this site. It’s greatly appreciated.

Anyone who wishes to show his appreciation of the work at RogueMale is also invited to make a donation via the Paypal button. Many thanks.

January 29, 2017 11

THE WAR AGAINST NATURE

Political Correctness, Transhumanism, Misandry and Misogyny – All attacks on Nature but to what end?

In a time of universal deceit, speaking the truth becomes an act of rebellion.

George Orwell.

I recently came across this post,

“The fear is waning and the bravery to speak the truth growing. In the future this trait could become a clear litmus test for anyone who appoints himself as one of our countless “event interpreters”: do they have the courage to say what we all see clearly in front of our face? Or do they sputter and waffle and shy away and equivocate?”

SOURCE

He’s right. If now is not the time to express the facts as they appear to you, then when is it?

Misandry is a hatred of men. The rise of feminism is a manufactured manifestation of misandry.

It is as responsible as any form of social engineering for promoting division between men and women because that is its intent. It is a subject which has been written about in great depth elsewhere but, in the briefest of explanations, it can be traced from the rise of the Suffragettes, through the promotion of degenerate Cultural Marxism as exemplified by the state of the Weimar Republic, the rise of the ‘flapper’ in the 1930s, to the promotion of cigarette smoking as a form of liberation by Edward Bernays, to the rise of ‘women’s lib’ to the documented efforts of the Rockefeller foundation to get women out of the home and into the workplace where they could be taxed. All of which led to millions of children, as a matter of practice, being handed over by their parents to the ‘care’ of strangers working for the state apparatchik who were to be entrusted, without question, with the welfare and education of their offspring.

Expressed in these terms, we can see how it has worked to the detriment of all, particularly the younger generations and especially those who were born post 1960. Feminism is thus a form of social and psychological engineering.

Another form is transhumanism. Much of the transhumanist agenda has been inculcated by programmers such as H G Wells and Aldous Huxley in their influential writings like War of the Worlds and Brave New World.

As a metaphor for social engineering via transhumanism, Michael Crichton’s ‘Westworld’ is a powerful work of fiction. The HBO series Westworld (2016) blatantly promotes a transhumanist agenda whose final denouement is the obliteration of ‘humans’ by androids, that have been created by the Anthony Hopkins character and his brother. Throughout its laborious 10 episodes, it relentlessly promotes the view that artificial intelligence is the means through which mankind can be improved. As such it is an anti-nature vehicle that promulgates the false view that man has been not been divinely created by the creator but is rather a creature that has built in imperfections that need fixing by the use of artificial intelligence/computer programming. It a series which promotes the insipid belief that mankind is fatally flawed and that androids are more perfect forms whose consciousness is ‘evolving’ via tweaks and adjustments to their programming.

Westworld (2016) – transhumanist propaganda.

Frequent and excessive violence is used throughout, with the overt message being that through extreme adversity, the consciousness of the androids increases. Order comes out of chaos, as the older model androids develop consciousness and memory.

However, being based in fallacy and founded on false scientific notions that go against nature (or God) Westworld is itself fatally flawed. How? Given the fact that most of Mankind’s brain is taken up with the functioning of our sense of vision and that it is so complex, Artificial Intelligence scientists and technicians have found it impossible to produce robots that are capable of seeing, the entire premise that the Hopkins’ character has been able to manufacture fully functioning robots falls into smithereens. It is literally science fiction. In other words, fake science is the false premise on which the entire series is founded. And that is stated without any consideration to the other senses or how one could create humanoids that are capable of experiencing ‘human’ emotions in the ranges the robots seemingly have, let alone the claim that they are some how ‘conscious’. Westworld is thus nothing less than transhumanist programming.

Feminism is also another form of programming, of a sort that is also anti-nature, even anti-christ (as in against consciousness). Nature may be ‘tamed’ by man when he works in harmony with her powers (gardening is a fine example, as is canal building, or even an invention like the bicycle) but nature will always ultimately triumph and mankind would do well to remember that fact at all times. What feminism does is discount the nature of Mankind and, as such, it is an affront to the natural law to which we are all subject. There is no one between the individual and Nature/God/his maker. Any ‘person’ or entity which imposes itself between him is anti-nature. The natural law to which we are all inextricably attached may be distilled to what is sometimes referred to as the Golden Rule: treat others as you would have them treat you. Or more bluntly, Do no harm, take no shit.

Given the foregoing, the image below may be taken as anti-nature.

The feminist with the placard is, as far as RM can see, a fuckwit. What on earth does she purport to be doing? Encouraging men to think less? To feel more? Moreover, who in their right mind is likely to listen to her? What does she mean by ‘straight white men’? Is she mentally ill? In any event, she is farting into the wind and her smug expression belies a head that will one day explode like a pumpkin lantern that has a stick of dynamite burning inside it. Is she causing harm? Only to those who are foolish enough to take her seriously.

RM suspects she may be one of those fake Social Justice Warriors (SJW) who erroneously believes that ‘straight white men’ are somehow the problem causing the world’s ills. With skewed thinking like that, she would be out of her depth in a puddle and, moreover, she is labouring under a form of misandry, the hatred of males. Misandry and misogyny are two sides of the same coin.

Speaking of the cerebrally challenged, the kind of man who may take her seriously is sometimes referred to as a ‘blue pill’ male. This type is characterised by a form of emasculated programming that results in the individual buying into all manner of cultural collectivist thinking. He swallows his blue pill and chooses the route of conformity and least resistance, seemingly so incapable of critical thinking and low on testosterone that he falls prey to all those who seek to control him and/or oppress him.

What is wrong with that, one might well ask? It is wrong because it goes against the nature of man which is to look outward, weigh up his situation and take action. The individual who does that will soon come to the realisation that he is not free, as he once mistakenly believed. Such individuals ‘go along to get along’ – they do not challenge authority, they form part of the ‘pay and obey’ mindset and lead themselves wide open to the manipulations of others. Whereas, the warrior does no harm but is aware of his inherent and natural right to self defence. The warrior takes no shit. The warrior does what is right. The warrior is brave enough to take the red pill.

How many warriors are there in the image below?

You can count them on no fingers. Presumably, the woman in the previous image would applaud the stance of these emasculated ‘men’ who are similarly anti-nature. What on earth is going through their minds? It is a sad image that reflects the deleterious effects of feminism and an education system that has utterly failed them; as was its intention all along.

These males are like turkeys voting for Christmas.

Little wonder that, as a counter balance to all this Cultural Marxist claptrap, we are witnessing the rise of the so-called ‘Men’s Rights Movement’, with its various offshoots. When nature is out of balance, equity must be restored. What the fuck does the slogan even mean – ‘the future is female’? It is empty rhetoric, just like the previous photograph, adding up to nothing. Throw into the mix the LGTBSG (or whatever it is called today) psyop and where is mankind heading?

RM would posit that, in reality, it is going towards greater freedom and that all of these fuckwits are hastening their own demise, their heads have gone, their thinking is like a lump of holy Swiss Cheese, their brains filled to the brim with half-baked notions of non-sensical political correctness, misguided whimsy and their balls shrunk to the size of raisins.

Back in the nineteen nineties, RM would jokingly state that he was a feminist, as it was the ‘only way to pull the chicks’. Like many of his generation, he had swallowed a load of Cultural Marxist engineering guff but part of him, at least, saw it exactly for what it was. Of course, being built on falsehoods, this programming, in the long term, was destined to break down. Which it did.

From the age of 16 to 18, RM was regularly inspired by a man called Michael Gillard, his A-level English teacher. A striking individual who stood at 6ft 3’, with a penchant for the dramatic and a love of language and literature shared by the young RM, he once told the class of a maxim which has stuck with RM ever since –

a young man can be forgiven for falling for the mental traps of socialism or some other collectivist philosophy, because he has a heart and wishes for fairness for all. If he has not dropped these false notions in later life, the same man has ‘no head’ and has failed to learn from his life’s experiences.

Whilst RM would have preferred to have been provided with a system of education that more thoroughly instilled in him the ability to think critically, that used the trivium and encouraged him to go his own way, such a path was simply not available to him or his cohorts in 1980s Huddersfield. Nevertheless, RM was always aware of the power inherent in language. Were it the case that language had no effect, then the efforts of the Tavistock Institute via Aldous Huxley would amount to nothing, as would all the works of whoever Shakespeare was, the oral traditions of the ancient British peoples, George Orwell and all those word-magicians who have worked their spells and cast their webs far and wide through the propagation of their words. As neatly expressed by Kevin Cole, all of it, as ever, is about,

“The use of language to create new realities”

What has become ever clearer over the course of time is this: when faced with a tyrannical system and its unthinking and compliant foot soldiers, a man, if he is a man, must take action. He will not look to go along with the tyranny for he knows all too well that if he does not stand under what is right, and gives up any of his freedoms for the illusions of peace and security, he will end up with none.

All those Social Justice Warriors (SJWs) who suck on the teat of the blue pill of systemic state propaganda will be faced with oblivion for they are going against nature. Such men are a danger to themselves for the simple reason that compliance breeds a prison for the mind, the beneficiaries of which are those who would seek to control them.

A man who is able to combine his gut instincts with his capacity for critical thinking/discernment is a man to be reckoned with for such a man is the culmination of his entire ancestral heritage.

Woe betide him if these faculties are clouded, obfuscated to the point of closure by some form of social engineering that has emasculated him. That man is a pussy in the sense that ne’er does he deal with the real issues of our times like the criminality of the banksters, the oppressions and deceptions of the Crown, the rigging of the judicial system or the effects of the Bread and Circus that manifests all around him. No, instead, he splashes around in a cess pit of irrelevance, speaking the false language of political correctness, even to the point of extolling the need for ‘women’s rights’ when it is the divine rights of Mankind as a whole that need trumpeting.

Such a man has become a shadow of what he could be and is as annoying and relevant as a fly that buzzes around in a room, bashing itself against the window, too dumb to go out of the gap and free itself from its confines. Little surprise to see the rise of the ‘Game’ and the Men’s Rights Movement, for nature abhors imbalance and it is only to be expected that to every form of oppression, there will be a corresponding response – after all, self defence is inherent in all aspects of sentient life and it rises by way of instinct. However, one wonders how many of these men are simply acting out the nerdish fantasy of being a stud, by way of their following of the Alpha Male players who command such large audiences across the Social Media. How many of them are really engaging with, for instance, the banking swindles that cause the genocide of their fellow indigenous peoples? How many are simply distracted by the question of into which vagina they will next be inserting their penis?

The divisive effects of feminism have led to the rise of such acronyms as ‘Men Going Their Own Way’ (MGTOW) which is supposed to be those men who have decided, quite reasonably, that the relationship game is simply one that is not worth playing. None of which is without its critics:

@IllimitableMan 8m8 minutes ago

MGTOW is how men who view women as pathogenic cell invading viruses pretend they don’t want or need women in their lives.

GAY!”

The rise of the ‘Game’ whereby insights into the nature of women who have been brought up with a false sense of entitlement are used for ‘pick up’ purposes (to get laid). The game players use well-established methods that tap into women’s biological and psychological natures in order to ‘bed’ them. Again, this is modus operandi is questionable:

@IllimitableMan 10m10 minutes ago

“Pick up artistry is how men who view women as the most important thing in their lives make them a priority via lame as fuck gay tricks.”

Thus, one of the most invidious effects of feminism has been the division of the male and female into two camps – the ‘feministas’ and the ‘lone wolf’, or man going his own way. Both are ladened respectively with misandry and misogyny, which are but two sides of the same coin and neither serve Mankind (which is all of us, male and female).

As Jordan B Peterson so eloquently puts it:

“Dividing our civilisation into polarised ideological camps of female group identity and male group identity is certainly not the answer. We have to be honest, male and female alike, about what we really want, as individuals, and talk it out. We know beyond dispute that societies who emancipate their women are much more productive and peaceful, and that the relationship is causal. Thus, it’s not a matter of if but how.” source

It is, he argues, necessary to acknowledge the Divine Individual of the Male with the Divine Mother of the Female: this is where our responsibilities lie. The alternative is nihilism, from which nothing emerges.

“The divine individual is masculine because the feminine is not individual: The divine feminine is, instead, mother and child. However, it a hallmark of Christian supposition that the redemption of both men and women comes through the masculine, and that is because the masculine is the individual. The central realization – expressed dramatically; symbolically – is that the subordination of the group to the ideal of the Divine Individual is the answer to the paradox of nihilism and totalitarianism.

The Divine Individual is the man that every man admires, and the man whom all women want their men to be. The Divine Individual is the ideal from which deviations are punished by the group with contempt and disgrace and fidelity to which is rewarded with attention and honor. The Divine Individual is not the winner of any individual game but the player who plays fair and is therefore continually invited to play. The Divine Individual is the builder, maintainer and expander of the state, he who boldly goes where no man has gone before, and someone who eternally watches over the widows and the children. His power of direct and honest communication is that which identifies, discusses and resolves the continually emergent problems of human existence. He is the Savior of the World.

The primary image for women is not the Divine Individual, because of the heavy burden they bear for reproduction. It is, instead, the Divine Mother and Child. This is not to say that man is the Divine Individual, and woman is not, although such confusion is understandable, given the complexity of the problem. Men, like women, have the Divine Mother and Child as an element of their personality. In men, however, it’s in the background, so to speak, as the Divine Individual is in the background of the psyche for women. Men, by necessity, play a less primary role in the care of children. This frees them to act as individuals in a manner that up to now has been nearly impossible for women. Identification with these images is belief in them. Belief is not the statement of agreement with a set of facts, but the willingness to act something out, to become something, to stake your life on something. For men and women alike, this means voluntary adoption of responsibility – responsibility for oneself, family and state. In that responsibility, and not in rights, resides Meaning itself – the meaning that makes life bearable.” source

Such has been the attack on the family unit, on the very essence of and potential for gender harmony, that many children have been raised by their mothers only. This is deleterious to the well-being of all, but particularly boys, who grow up without a strong male presence and example.

Take another look at those men and that woman in the photographs and ask yourself, whether you are male or female, could any of these people be relied upon in a moment of crisis, in a battle, to stand shoulder to shoulder with you or to defend you in any meaningful way? It’s a good question for these are the times when we should choose our companions wisely, especially when psychological warfare is being waged upon us by our would-be controllers and fake news outlets (such as the BBC ) propagate the age-old divide and rule strategies.

In the meantime, here is an image to balance out the woe-begotten photographs used earlier:

____________________________________________________________________________________________

Many thanks to all those who support the work at RM and especially to Rob and Anne U for their kind donations. Again, any reader who wishes to show his or her appreciation by way of a donation is encouraged to do so. Cheers.

January 17, 2017 0

#TGBMS: A MORTGAGE EXPLAINED IN 600 WORDS

There are some 11.2 million of them in Britain but how many people actually understand what a mortgage is?

A mortgage literally means, ‘Dead Pledge’: late Middle English: from Old French, literally ‘dead pledge,’ from mort (from Latin mortuus ‘dead’) + gage ‘pledge.’

A pledge is a promise. A mortgage is a dead promise.

On its face, it seems very straightforward – a man receives a loan, called a mortgage, for a property and, in so doing, agrees to pay it back within a set period, usually 25 years. Should he fail to do so, the creditor (the lender) claims the right to take his property by way of the registered charge created by his signature on the Mortgage Deed, which forms his sincere promise to pay.

However, it is more complex than many of us would imagine.

What if you were told that, as a matter of fact, no loan had taken place?

You might ask,

’How could that be? The bank loaned me the money and I used it to buy the house and the land. I borrowed their money, therefore, I have to pay it back.’

However, this is an illusion. How?

The bank (the mortgagee) did not actually loan you any of its own money. Most money is created as debt in the form of ‘loans’ and every ‘loan’ is created as a ‘promise to pay’ – just like the Bank of England notes in your wallet.

How does this work? The key document is the mortgage deed. When you sign it, you are acknowledging, without any evidence, that you have received a sum of money. You are also falsely and unlawfully advised to sign it before you are the owner of the property. It is false on the simple basis that no one can place a charge on a property which is not theirs at the time the deed was signed.

This document is also a valuable financial instrument to the bank (the mortgagee). In fact, being a promise to pay, it is as good as cash to the banker who takes it and deposits it in a special account which he never tells you about. In this sense, you are, in fact, the creditor. Your signature has created the line of credit which is streamed from that account and used to buy the property.

The mortgage deed is the keystone in an elaborate fraud, a financial racket that is revealed in the ‘shockumentary’ film, #TheGreatBritishMortgageSwindle.

The banker is, quite literally, creating the money out of thin air by way of strokes on a computer keyboard. No deposits are loaned, neither out of the bank’s vaults or from customers’ accounts.

Once the deed is signed, but always undated, at a time when you are not the owner, have received no moneys and have no written contract with the bank (as required at law) the swindle moves into full swing. The banker misrepresents the facts by falsely claiming you borrowed money, then compound interest is added on top of the fake loan and, in the event you fail to make the payments for 3 consecutive months, it will instruct its solicitors to make a false possession claim against you which will invariably result in the house – the purchase of which, remember, you funded – being stolen by way of a fake County Court Order.

__________________________________________________

TGBMS LINKS

Buy the DVD (https://thegreatbritishmortgageswindle.us20.list-manage.com/track/click?u=d15706cafc460fd76074a0069&id=3aa64175f0&e=483727ac6f)

Watch on Amazon Prime (https://thegreatbritishmortgageswindle.us20.list-manage.com/track/click?u=d15706cafc460fd76074a0069&id=d173e8fbab&e=483727ac6f)

Book Cinema Tickets (https://thegreatbritishmortgageswindle.us20.list-manage.com/track/click?u=d15706cafc460fd76074a0069&id=588e7d8966&e=483727ac6f)

Download Free PDF of TGBMS: Next Steps (https://thegreatbritishmortgageswindle.us20.list-manage.com/track/click?u=d15706cafc460fd76074a0069&id=464b61d3d1&e=483727ac6f)

January 16, 2017 40

CULTURE IS NOT YOUR FRIEND

As the cogs of the Gregorian calendar shift into another numerical gear, RM has recently been considering the cultural swamp that is the social media and my disenchantment with its seething, babbling and incessant content. This insight of Jasun Horsley focuses that view sharply:

“Too much cultural immersion is no doubt accentuating the focus on the negative in a way that isn’t necessarily productive. Judging by the sort of cultural entertainment we choose, we also wallow in dark stuff to distract us from our own darkness.”

He argues that culture is seeded with all kinds of dark memes and ‘realities’ that distract us from focusing on the dark aspects of our own psyches, and thus prevent us facing and releasing them,

“These psychological and social principals are understood well enough to be applied and so, of course, they have been. A large part of cultural engineering has to do with seeding us with fantasy-based fears that, over time, give rise to the social realities that control us.”

Social engineering, by way of financial, physical, spiritual and psychological manipulation are key components in the operations of those who would seek to control Mankind (the various methods of which have been touched on frequently at the RM site). Such is their pervasiveness, the awakening individual may well be compelled to ask, who is writing the script? This leads me inevitably to consider those works with which I am currently engaged and how important it is to focus on writing one’s own script and not participate in those scripted realities provided by the usual outlets as exemplified by the social media (Faceborg and Twatter to name but two of the main culprits).

For that reason, 2017 will witness the revival of the RogueCast (podcast), further writings on these pages concerning a variety of subjects and continued promotion of the ‘shockumentary’ TGBMS (a film which, among other things, will serve to seed the mind of Mankind concerning the way he has been subjected to a form of iniquitous and immoral enslavement to a banking fraud that is as embedded in his mind as it is in the bricks and mortar of the shelter he lives in). A key aspect of the film concerns what the individual can do to escape its odious shackles, so there is much work to do on that front, for all of us who have chosen to engage in this epic challenge.

In association with the film, RM is also planning on writing an eponymously titled book, in hard copy and e-book form which will add further meat to the bones of the swindle.

As we begin another calendrical round, there is much to look forward to and, in short, the less time spent wading through the treacle that pours from the orifices of the MSM and social media, the better for each of us.

As less time will be spent on the aforementioned cultural swamp that is the social media, any one who wishes to contact RM is encouraged to do so via the email address referenced on this site and also to visit the forum.

Much love and blessings at the current time to all readers of these pages and, as ever, a huge thank-you to all who continue to support the work of RM and those at the Self-Realisation Community.

Special appreciation to the following readers for their kind and generous donations: David R, Rhys J, June C, Jan B and Matt C.

Any one who is similarly inclined to make a kind donation in support of truly independent media and RM’s efforts is encouraged to do so – it will be most appreciated.

January 2, 2017 0

#TGBMS – PLAYING YOUR PART

THE RED, WHITE & BLUE PILL

WE LIVE IN A CIRCUS MAXIMUS – WHOSE SCRIPT ARE YOU FOLLOWING?

The fact is elections are invariably rigged by the controllers. It’s an age old game and the election of Donald Trump is the latest example. If voting made a difference they wouldn’t let you do it.

Elections, however, are just one aspect of the bigger picture.

We live in a shaped reality, a rigged Circus Maximus in which spin doctors, marketeers, advertisers, political think-tanks, shadow governments like the Council on Foreign Relations, lobbyists, disinformation artists and other ‘clever bastards’ write the scripts. These scripts are promoted via the mass media, through television programming, social media outlets that are infected with paid deniers, shills and statists, through the print media, press releases and all manner of news agencies controlled by the Crown House of Rothschild [The Guardian – who owns it? ]. To make the population gullible and open to the ‘messages’, there is a state system of outcome-based miseducation which places the emphasis on the young being programmed with what to think rather than how to think.

This means that due to the nature of the human mind, which loves a dramatic story, we are psychologically, emotionally and spiritually drawn into a collective sharing of scripted realities, a passive acceptance of which is the aim of the various media that promulgate the propaganda which shapes our thoughts. All of which is designed to make one feel powerless, even if one is aware that it is a rigged system.

What can the individual do about it? The only remedy is to deploy one’s critical thinking skills, learn the methods that are used against us via the controlled media and exercise one’s own creative thinking and imagination. An immediate method of loosening the grip and tuning out of the harmful frequencies is to simply turn off the television and removing one’s mind from its pernicious influences. Even a walk in the park can achieve this. On top of which, one would do well to make the effort to engage with others and explain to them the facts of the matter. This, of course, is the way RM operates – throughout this website, speculation and conjecture is avoided: one is sharing the experiences and the first hand knowledge of what one has been through and has come to understand.

That circuses and pantomimes are effective in controlling us is beyond doubt. Theatrical devices work because the man-made world is truly a theatre, a point succinctly made by whoever was behind the brand known as ‘William Shakespeare’:

All the world’s a stage,

And all the men and women merely players;

They have their exits and their entrances;

And one man in his time plays many parts […]”

The question, as ever, is who is writing the script? Is one the creative force behind one’s own life or is some other entity, group or individual shaping your thoughts and directing you in a particular way? Have you swallowed the lies of an elaborately rigged and fake reality?

A reminder of the power of the stagecraft that is used by all scriptwriters, whatever the medium, came to me when I went to the theatre the other week to see a Jacobean play. Originally performed at the Globe in 1604, The Revenger’s Tragedy is filled with conspiracy, murder, sex, deception and violence. The rise of the professional actor and theatre during those times was certainly an attempt to persuade, influence and manipulate the reality of the public who paid to see the plays. This is why, when one digs a little deeper, the realisation that we are on a ‘stage’ hits us. The stage set is rigged, there are exits stage left, entrances stage right, the lights are cued, make up, costume, well-crafted lines, a gripping narrative – the ingredients are the same as they always were, only now wide-reaching technology increases the impact on the individual and collective psyche.

Many are, of course, waking up to the nature of the mass manipulations and those who are utilising their own discernment and imagination are, as ever, playing a vital role in freeing mankind from the yoke of the fake reality. It is about each one of us unleashing the power of our imaginations and, in so doing, inspiring others to take action that will result in a seismic shift towards liberation. After all, one’s own individual liberty is worthless unless others are free too.

Like so many others, RM has had a gut full of the utterly fraudulent & tyrannical financial system that dominates our lives. If one looks closely at the world in which he lives, then he will begin to see through its shiny and false facade and perceive the rigged reality around him. For instance, having lived on these shores for over half a century, it is plain for RM to state that, for all the advances in technology, there has been a steady decline in the living standards of the majority. Towns and cities are crumbling away and industries like steel, coal, oil, gas and engineering have been deliberately sold off to the detriment of the people. Communities have been shattered and, as the elites have ‘prospered’, the majority have become poorer and poorer.

For long enough, the younger RM tried to ignore all of this but, with time, it could no longer be so. Action was required. As RM declared in Nottingham County on 26 August 2009, it is his “duty” to get to the bottom of The Great British Mortgage Swindle and reveal it in its entirety. So be it.

The facts are plain enough.

There are some 11.2 million mortgaged homes across these lands. That fact involves, if we take an average of 4 people per household, perhaps as many as 44 million men, women and children. Each of them, one way or another, is affected by the fact whereby each month moneys are paid to/extorted by the Banks in order to keep a roof over their heads. It’s a racket.

Let that sink in for a minute.

Now, let us engage in an imagining of an altogether different reality.

Consider this: how would everyone’s life change if those void mortgages were gone? Blown away. Evaporated. Nothing to pay. The home owned outright, free and clear of any and all payments. What would be the impact on the quality of life for all? On the economy?

Time and energy would be freed up for everyone to live more creatively and productively. In every sense.

Can you imagine such a scenario? RM certainly can. If not, ask yourself ‘why not?’

If your response is, ‘well, that’s never going to happen’ or ‘it’s totally unrealistic’ then consider this: what is it that has led you to such a dismissal? Whose reality are you buying into? Who benefits from such a mindset? Is the status quo that you perceive actually real or is it a scripted reality?

In the meantime, whichever way one looks at it, the issue of eviction remains gargantuan. Families across these lands are being evicted – by the National Trust, Housing Associations and local councils (sometimes over the ‘bedroom’ tax and council tax). And, invariably, it is over fake debt.

Each eviction, for whatever the reason, is an act of genocide on the simple basis that it causes mental and physical harm to indigenous groups of peoples and it is politically motivated by a system of control which places money above life and well-being. It matters not if one is living in a council house, a hovel, a terraced house, a suburban semi, a large detached house, a castle or a farm, the issue of the mortgage swindle affects us all. Councils in Scotland are collecting moneys to pay off fake debts to the banksters, rentals to private landlords inevitably go to the same way, via buy-to-let mortgages, most mortgages are securitised, with the banks acting as collection agents on behalf of the mortgage backed security investors, whilst compound interest sucks out the marrow from all our bones.

No matter who or wherever we are, there exist parasitical entities and individuals intent on bleeding us dry. In short, we are living in a bankster-dominated kleptocracy of fake debt. Even the National Trust is evicting families.

The shockumentary film, The Great British Mortgage Swindle, is a cinematic work of art that will blow away the CHOR (Crown House of Rothschild) controlled banksters and all those in the judiciary and ‘legal’ industry (particularly the conveyancing solicitors upon whose gross negligence and omissions the entire swindle depends) who continue to commit fraud and attempt to prop it up at all costs to the blatant detriment of the British people.

It serves to illustrate a judicial system that applies the law selectively. Any one with a modicum of historical knowledge knows that such a system of injustice is untenable in the long term:

“Nothing rankles more in the human heart than a brooding sense of injustice. Illness we can put up with. But, injustice makes us want to pull things down. When, only the rich can enjoy the law, as a doubtful luxury, and the poor, who need it most, cannot have it, because, its expense puts it beyond their reach, the threat to the continued existence of free democracy is not imaginary but very real, because democracy’s very life depends upon making the machinery of justice so effective that every citizen shall believe in and benefit by its impartiality and fairness.”

MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN

On the basis that harm caused to others affects us all, one way or another, TGBMS is a must-see film, no matter what one’s particular circumstances. The only ones who can bring this to an end are us, people from all backgrounds and walks of life. No puppet politician in the theatre of parliament will provide relief. All those who have sworn the Privy Council oath stand conflicted – their first allegiance, under this mafia oath, is to the Crown, the figurehead of which is a woman known as Elizabeth Windsor, but whose real power lies in the shadows, where the adroit script-writers lurk. None of them give a flying feck about any of us – to them we are as unruly cattle who must be dumbed down, controlled, held in place and energetically screwed by the financial system or religion known as money.

TGBMS, the film, is also a riveting and powerful documentary that blows open the doors of this psychotic & genocidal kleptocracy that afflicts the people of these lands. It stands not only as historic testimony to the times we are living through but also as an antidote to the lies and distortions of the controlled media and its script writers. Unlike their output, it demands the viewer’s attention and the whole of his brain, whilst engaging his heart via the trauma and drama of the content. In so doing, it shifts the viewer into a different perception of the world he inhabits. What follows after viewing is down to his imagination and willingness to take action – to do something to change an intolerable situation.

Remember, this article is to encourage the reader to imagine a scenario where all this faux financial control has gone, where our homes and the land are ours and exorbitant rents and usurious compound interest payments are no more. The film will also assist in some way to us achieving this. RM states this on the basis that knowledge is power and that the more of us who grasp the fact that there are 11.2m home owners across these lands who falsely believe they have a valid mortgage, the sooner we can bring into effect the change that is required. Freedom from financial tyranny is the name of the game, for each of us and future generations.

Briefly, then, let us reiterate the facts of the matter.

The mortgage deed/charge is fraudulent and it has been all along.

How?

The reader is encouraged to dig into this site’s ‘Rogue Mortgage’ pages for further details, but in the simplest of terms:

The Deed of Mortgage/Charge is a financial security of which you are the originator (i.e the creditor) by way of your signature which constitutes your promise to pay (the dead pledge = mort gage).
Said ‘deed’ is void from the beginning because when you signed it you were not the owner of the property and, due to 1. above, neither were you the borrower. This makes it a false receipt and an illegal document. All of which renders it void.
Due to 1. above, no loan ever took place. The Deed was deposited as a security and a line of credit streamed from the creation of some electronic figures in an account, as if created out of thin air. The bank then fraudulently claims it loaned you moneys. No loan ever takes place.
Due to 1 and 3 above, each and every party in the transaction was paid and the house was purchased outright, albeit in digital credits (which could be converted into the privately issued notes of the Bank of England, if so desired).
The remedy does not lie in the rigged court system. Rather, it lies at the door of the duped Land Registry, the staff of which have negligently registered 11.2 million of these fraudulent securities on its books, despite the fact they are duty bound to protect said properties from fraud!
It cannot be magically turned into a valid mortgage either.
There is no valid Power of Attorney for the Bank to act on your behalf – without which all possession claims, instruments, documents etc that are created and executed on your behalf are void too. All of which adds another level of deceit to TGBMS.

What to do?

The first step is fess up to the fact, that along with millions of others, you were duped by the conveyancing solicitor. Educate yourself as to the facts of the rigged game. Remember the circumstances of how and when you came to sign (execute) the deed – a gut instinct may have made you feel something was wrong at the time. Read the Rogue Mortgage section on this site. Next, combine the experience with the facts of the matter and the prima facie evidence. The law and even the statutory requirements for a valid mortgage are on your side.

Next, have a listen to this remarkable interview with the editor and producer of TGBMS, Michael of Bernicia. It not only provides the listener with the back story of how TGBMS came to be made but also includes some salient information regarding the creation of the void charge, its consequence and what can be done about it.

Then, take time to go through the formation of your own mortgage – work out the relevant dates, dig out any and all documentation – a copy of the void deed, the letter from the conveyancing solicitor asking you sign but not date it. Armed with the truth, you have the right to demand at the Land Registry that the register be rectified on the basis that a void charge has been recorded and, as such, there is a mistake in the register which needs correcting. In addition, indemnity may be owed, pursuant to the losses that have been sustained. This would be duly provided via the Land Registry’s indemnity policy (underwritten by HM Treasury).

In the previous article, The Financial Sleuth, we referenced and included a download of the research paper into how loans are created out of thin air by Professor Richard Werner of Southampton University.

Richard Werner is actively playing his part in the unveiling of the hidden ‘magic’ of the world’s most powerful religion, mon-eye.

This is attributed to a lecture by Richard on banking – we cannot attest to its validity but it certainly rings true:

“I will tell you key points about banks. In case you thought banks lend money, they take deposits and lend money. You are wrong . Banking was developed, modern banking was developed, in the United Kingdom in the 17th century and the legal facts are very clear but not very well known.

Banks do not take deposits and banks do not lend money. That’s a fact. How is that possible? Well, legally they do not take deposits. They borrow from the public, because your money at the bank is not on deposit. Its not held in custody, it’s not a bailment. What is it legally? You have lent money to the bank. So the expression in banking are designed to mislead what’s really happening. Who is the owner of this money? It is the banks, you are just a general creditor. Which is very different from the impression given when we use the term deposit.

What about lending surely banks lend money? No they don’t. No bank has ever lent any money. How is that possible? What does a bank do? Banks purchase securities and they don’t pay up. That’s what they do. How is that? Well if you go to the bank and you borrow money you sign a loan contract. Very crucial. Your signature creates the money supply. Because the bank legally will consider the loan contract a promissory note. And that is what is considered legally, is a promissory note.

Just like the bank of England Note, central bank money, paper money, is a promissory note from the central bank. And the bank purchases this contract. That is what they do, they purchase the loan contract. Now they owe you money.

You say I don’t care about the mechanics, give me the money. The banker will say we will put it in your account. You will find it in your bank account.

Well what is a bank account? It is not a deposit. It’s a record of the bank’s debt to the public. It is a record of the bank’s debt to the new borrower, and they show you the record of how much money they owe you. That is it, they don’t pay up. And this is how the money supply is created. So let’s go in sequence:

Step one: You go to the bank and you sign the loan contract, say a thousand pounds. This will be recorded in the bank balance sheet as an increase in bank assets.

The bank will then record its debt to the borrower. But it will do this by way of some accountant trick. It should really say this is an accounts payable item. Something that the bank has to pay but it has not yet paid. But it won’t record as an accounts payable.

If you talk to an bank’s accountant they are horrified “No you cannot use an expression like accounts payable in a bank” And do you know why? Because they recorded it as customer deposit.

They show it on the bank’s liability side as a customer deposit. But nobody has deposited it, the customer has not deposited for sure. The customer is borrowing it. The bank has not deposited either. It is added to the money supply, and this is how 97% of the money supply is created out of nothing on the basis of a signature and of course on the credit of the borrower. That is money creation. So no money is transferred from any where else to the borrowers account.” LINK TO YOU TUBE COMMENT.

In the meantime, let’s reconsider this earlier question:

Can you imagine what it would be like if no one had to pay hundreds of pounds each month to keep a roof over their heads?

We certainly can. Imagine too the effect it would have not just on the immediate lives of those individuals and families but also the boost it would give to the economy… to the natural rise of trading between peoples and the removal of all the usury, the unjust enrichment and, let’s be fair, the blatant criminality of the banks.

Now isn’t that a better script for everyone?

#TheGreatBritishMortgageSwindle will be screening at 1pm on 17 December, 2016 at the Arthouse Cinema, Crouch End in London. Visit the Box Office to reserve places.

Thereafter, it will also be screened in cinemas across these islands. To reserve a place in your town or city, please visit Cinema On Demand (COD)

____________________________________________________________

Best wishes to all, and a special thank you to the following for their kind donations and support – Jan B, David R, Michael Of Bernicia, Andy Young and Jason at Raconteurs News, Tobe Leigh, Jeb.

As ever, I’m asking readers who appreciate my work to make a donation of their choosing to support the continued production of the articles and podcasts, each of which takes a number of hours to produce.

Of course, by supporting me, you incentivise me to not only continue publishing new content, but to do so with increased frequency and this will provide me with much needed support. Many thanks.

Further reading: http://www.thebernician.net/tgbms-check-mate/

http://thinkfree.org.uk/forum/index.php/board,36.0.html

November 23, 2016 3

THE PLUNDER & GENOCIDE OF EVICTION.

CML REVEAL ONE MILLION BRITISH PEOPLE GENOCIDED BY EVICTION SINCE 2008.

#TGBMS – HOW LONG BEFORE THE BRITISH MIDDLE CLASSES WAKE UP TO THE FACT THEY’RE BEING SWINDLED?

EXPOSING THE SWINDLE: IF YOU’RE MIDDLE CLASS & NOT ANGRY YET, THEN YOU’D BETTER START PAYING ATTENTION.

RM has written previously about how eviction is an act of genocide. Most right thinking individuals will regard Israel’s evictions of the Palestinian peoples and the violent theft of their lands as genocide but few will stop to consider how the British Establishment is similarly engaging in acts of genocide against its own people across these lands. Before continuing, the reader, if he isn’t already aware of it, should consider the contents of these articles – here and here.

An eviction is also an act of plunder, carried out by agents of the state, which in turn, is controlled by the Banksters – a provably criminal cadre, operating under the aegis of the House of Rothschild.

plunder |ˈpləndər|

verb [ with obj. ]

steal goods from (a place or person), typically using force and in a time of war or civil disorder: looters moved into the disaster area to plunder stores | [ no obj. ] : the invaders were back and ready to plunder.

• steal (goods), typically using force and in a time of disorder.

• take material from (artistic or academic work) for one’s own purposes: we shall plunder related sciences to assist our research.

noun

the violent and dishonest acquisition of property: the farmers suffered the inhumanity and indignities of pillage and plunder.

• property acquired illegally and violently: the army sacked the city and carried off huge quantities of plunder.

DERIVATIVES

plunderer |ˈplənd(ə)rər| noun

ORIGIN

mid 17th cent.: from German plündern, literally ‘rob of household goods,’ from Middle High German plunder ‘household effects.’ Early use of the verb was with reference to the Thirty Years’ War (1618–48), reflecting German usage; on the outbreak of the English Civil War in 1642, the word and activity were associated with the forces under Prince Rupert.

When we do not learn the lessons of history, we are destined to repeat them. Frederick Bastiat was an eloquent historian and philosopher who knew this all too well. He writes not of theory but of facts. When a government and its judiciary are engaged in acts of plunder against its peoples, the results, as demonstrated time and time again by history, are palpable. The facts are stark.

“No legal plunder: This is the principle of justice, peace, order, stability, harmony, and logic. Until the day of my death, I shall proclaim this principle with all the force of my lungs (which alas! is all too inadequate).”

“The Results of Legal Plunder

It is impossible to introduce into society a greater change and a greater evil than this: the conversion of the law into an instrument of plunder.

What are the consequences of such a perversion? It would require volumes to describe them all. Thus we must content ourselves with pointing out the most striking.

In the first place, it erases from everyone’s conscience the distinction between justice and injustice.

No society can exist unless the laws are respected to a certain degree. The safest way to make laws respected is to make them respectable. When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law. These two evils are of equal consequence, and it would be difficult for a person to choose between them.

The nature of law is to maintain justice. This is so much the case that, in the minds of the people, law and justice are one and the same thing. There is in all of us a strong disposition to believe that anything lawful is also legitimate. This belief is so widespread that many persons have erroneously held that things are “just” because law makes them so. Thus, in order to make plunder appear just and sacred to many consciences, it is only necessary for the law to decree and sanction it. Slavery, restrictions, and monopoly find defenders not only among those who profit from them but also among those who suffer from them.” SOURCE

We are living in such times. If any one doubts this, then they are not paying attention. The following image of the Tory Cabinet serves as a wake up call to any one who doubts we are living under a kleptocracy of the most obvious kind. Each of the cabinet members is a millionaire. Quite how and why each believes himself to be suited to govern over others is left to the reader to speculate but it is plain to state such individuals have no care or interest in the well-being of the people of these lands.

In the meantime, the masses of people are distracted by a sting operation which hits a number of men who are involved in the circus of distraction known as football.

I write at a time when the British press is agog over a series of sting operations performed by undercover Daily Telegraph ‘journalists’ on a number of British football managers and coaches. The secretly filmed episodes invariably reveal a world of bungs, hidden player ownership by third parties, overpaid footballers, inflated salaries and out-of-control egos. Sam Allardyce is, thus far, the biggest fish to be caught in the net.

Many have been stating for years that corruption lies at the heart of Britain’s ‘national sport’ and this sting operation is the proof of it: it amounts to plunder:

“The fragmented cartel of corrupting forces destroying the integrity of British football are making a fortune out of their systemic conspiracy.

Contacts within FIFA, UEFA, the bookmaking sectors of SE Asia and Europe as well as our cellular network reckon that between £6 billion and £24 billion was conspiratorially laundered via match fixing in EPL last season.” SOURCE

Some journalists have even claimed that this is a vindication of British journalism, a fine example of how skilful undercover sleuthing can get to the heart of the matter and reveal the inherent charade for what it is.

However, RM would have to disagree with that on the simple basis that British mainstream ‘journalism’ is wholly controlled by its owners, establishment figures like the creepy Rupert Murdoch, whose editors keep a firm grip on what does and doesn’t get published. Political tones are largely superficial, the Guardian is as full of spurious information and conventional opinion as the Telegraph, the Mirror as full of gossip as the Mail, etc etc.

No. The mainstream press is dead in the water. A dead duck, a pathetic version of what once may have existed but now is no more. Namely, investigative journalism.

RM is not one to blow his own trumpet and would hardly describe himself as a journalist. Nevertheless, the contents of this site do serve as first hand testimony to his experiences and insights. The research of others outside the mainstream provides the depth that is so blatantly lacking in the press and other mainstream media (MSM).

Perhaps the last truly investigative TV programme was the BBC’s ‘Rough Justice’ – a series that delved into the ever-fruitful world of Her Majesty’s Courts to uncover a plethora of miscarriages of justice. It so piqued the establishment that the Attorney General erroneously attacked its methods and the stalwart of the justice system, Lord Denning, even went so far as to state it was deplorable that the British justice system was being portrayed in such a light when it was crucial that the commonly held view of it as the best in the world was maintained at all costs, even to the detriment of those who had suffered gross injustices at its hands.

Such a view is utterly deplorable as it amounts to nothing less than an establishment cover up.

The investigative journalists who worked on the programme were eventually hounded out as a result of pressure from the government and the judiciary and it went into decline before disappearing from tv screens in 2007.

Thus, whilst it is okay to expose the dubious workings of the rigged world of the football industry in Britain and elsewhere, it is less acceptable to the controllers to use the same techniques to expose the nefarious activities of the elite – whether it be a chancellor snorting cocaine, a Labour mp engaging in activity with rent boys, systemic corruption amongst politicians and their expenses, the selling of arms to Arab countries, the genocide of benefit cuts, the murky dealings of the Royal Family, money laundering by HSBC or the effects of zionism and/or usury on the peoples of the world – so those investigations invariably do not begin or get covered up to be spun out like the Chilcot Report into years of fake scrutiny by the very members of the same establishment that is under investigation.

So, the Telegraph journalists use their investigative powers to delve into the murky world of the industry known as football but why do they not put said powers to a more pressing issue, like the fraudulent operations of the money changers? And yet, there are some among them who are wakening to the truth :

“ All these guys care about is money. They don’t care about society. They certainly don’t care about jobs and they don’t care about you.

OK, you might say, but this has always been going on. But it hasn’t. This sort of utterly amoral screw-everyone capitalism has become much more prevalent in the last 15 years. Our financial elite is now totally out of control. They learned nothing from the crisis, except that the rest of us were stupid enough to give them a second chance. And, now, having plucked all the “low hanging fruit,” they’re destroying the middle classes for profit.

Our current problems have their roots in the early 80s. While much of what Reagan and Thatcher did was necessary, the trouble is that they set a deregulatory train in motion which, over the last couple of decades has dismantled so much of the legal framework that protected us from greedy scuzzballs.” Alex Proud, The Telegraph

The Wells Fargo banking fraud is a massive story – one of fake accounts, fraudulent debts and paltry fines that go to the coffers of the Rothschild controlled Federal Reserve and not into the pockets of those whose names have been stolen and used for profiteering:

“Reality Check: How Does Nobody Go To Jail In Wells Fargo Case After over 1.2 Million People Were Defrauded? And Why No Matter What Other Crimes The Bank Committed, They Have Been Granted Immunity!” SOURCE

By way of illustration of the genocide and plunder that is eviction, let’s take a look at the Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML) own figures for ‘repossessions’ (evictions) for the UK from 2008 to the present. The following table shows that in those eight years there has been 262,000 evictions. Many of those homes will have been family homes.

REPOSSESSION FIGURES 2008-2016, Council of Mortgage Lenders.

If there’s an average of 4 people per household, that figure stands at around 1,048,000 men, women and children evicted from 2008 to 2016.

And on it goes – plunder and genocide by banking cartels and their puppets in government and the judiciary, all backed up by the order followers known as bailiffs and police, each of whom remains individually culpable for their part in #TheGreatBritishMortgageSwindle.

In every sense, this story is self-evidently a bigger and more important issue than the antics of those largely unintelligent greedy ring masters who play around in the Circus known as ‘professional football’.

Conclusion: the print media is currently unfit for purpose. All it deals in is gossip and superficiality – the age-old bread and circus game of distracting the masses from the more important issues. There are, by the CML’s own figures, some 11.2 million mortgaged properties in the UK, each of which has a void charge hanging over it. A void charge that has been falsely registered at the Land Registry.

As and when the middle classes wake up to the swindle, then said Land Registry will be deluged in a tsunami of applications for each of those void charges to be removed. The people will bite back, just as Bastiat says,

“It is impossible to introduce into society a greater change and a greater evil than this: the conversion of the law into an instrument of plunder.”

That is manifestly where we are at and the upcoming theatrical release of #TGBMS will go some way to redressing the balance.

We began with a quotation by a Frenchman, so let’s end with another (from a surprising source) which is as relevant now as it was 201 years ago:

”When a government is dependent upon bankers for money, they and not the leaders of the government control the situation, since the hand that gives is above the hand that takes… Money has no motherland; financiers are without patriotism and decency; their sole object is gain.”

– Napoleon Bonaparte, Emperor of France 1815.

In the meantime, this autumn will mark the release of a cinematic investigation into the genocide of eviction. To book a place at a screening near you, please visit this site, TGBMS.

http://youtu.be/vQuvM7n-BFE?a

Acknowledgements: Many thanks to Jan B and Rhys J for their kind donations. Any reader who appreciates the work of RM is invited to make a donation via the button in the right hand column of this site.

October 4, 2016 8

WHO ARE THE REAL EXTREMISTS?

THOSE WHO FLOUT THE RULE OF LAW OR THOSE WHO INSIST ON IT BEING APPLIED?

The inherent extremism of the Land Registry, the Judiciary and the Conveyancing Solicitors.

Prior to the Second World War, it used to be the case that no eviction would have taken place across these lands without a County Court Jury deciding that, on the balance of evidence, the individual(s) tenant or mortgagor actually deserved to be on the receiving end of such an extreme course of action. Continue reading “WHO ARE THE REAL EXTREMISTS?” →

September 11, 2016 8

Author: ROGUE MALE