Starmer Jumps the Shark

Keir Starmer, as controlled by Morgan McSweeney, a man of dubious association with the slithering creature going by the name of Peter Mandelson, aka the Prince of Darkness,  has jumped the shark.

Whilst he has many scandals in his Back-Ali funded closet, not the least being the curious narrative regarding the 3 Ukrainian/Russian rent boys who fire-bombed 3 of his properties, it is as clear as day that his ridiculous claim that if one doesn’t agree to a Brit-Card, the state issued tracking, spying and data gathering method, as so beloved by the Chinese rulers, then one will not be able to work, travel or take part in the shit-show that he calls the United Kingdom.

But, as we know, the ‘United Kingdom’ is merely a legal fiction, a corporate entitiy which only exists in a fantasy realm of airy-fairy nonsense, and is based entirely on the deceptive language of legalese, the double-crossing linguistical construct that is designed to trick you.

Equally importantly, what is a ‘mandate’ and does it have any basis in our ancient law?

mandate(n.)
c. 1500, “a command, a judicial or legal order,” from French mandat (15c.) and directly from Latin mandatum “commission, command, order,”

noun use of neuter past participle of mandare “to order, commit to one’s charge,” literally “to give into one’s hand,” probably from manus “hand” (from PIE root *man- (2) “hand”) + dare “to give” (from PIE root *do- “to give”).

mandatory(adj.)

1570s, “of the nature of a mandate, containing a command,” from Late Latin mandatorius “pertaining to a mandator” (one who gives a charge or command), from Latin mandatus, past participle of mandare (see mandate (n.)). Sense of “obligatory because commanded” is from 1818. Source

MANDATE, civil law. Mandates were the instructions which the emperor addressed to public functionaries, which were to serve as rules for their conduct.

2. These mandates resembled those of the pro-consuls, the mandata jurisdictio, and were ordinarily binding on the legates or lieutenants of the emperor of the imperial provinces, and, there they had the authority of the principal edicts. Sav. Dr. Rom. ch. 3, 24, n. 4

Source: Bouviers Law Dictionary.

 

As Sir William Blackstone wrote,

“This law of nature, being coeval with mankind, and dictated by God himself, is of course superior in obligation to any other. It is binding over all the globe in all countries, and at all times: no human laws are of any validity, if contrary to this; and such of them as are valid derive all their force and all their authority, mediately or immediately, from this original.”

Ultimately, there is no such thing as a mandate and Starmer is effectively acting as a Roman Emperor under Civil Law and because there is no such precedent under ancient law, he is spouting empty rhetoric. This is typical of those lickspittles who populate the fraudulent Legal System, each of whom knows not the Law and has been brain-washed in the deceptive language and practices of legalese.

Thus, he has jumped the shark. In so doing, he has unleashed a momentous backlash in the public, many of whom will not comply. Even if it is only 10% of the adult population of c. 50 million, that would amount to 5 million people, which is easily enough to bring it to a grinding halt.

Remember, nothing will happen without your consent, so refuse to comply, stand back and watch the entirety of the digital id and CBDC collapse in its own hubris.

As ever, thank you for your attention.

Should you value these essays and my discourses on RogueMale, then please tip me a few quid via the Buy Me a Coffee button and/or take out a subscription to my Substack pages.