Anarchy or Statism?

In this RogueCast, I discourse over the subject of Anarchy, the inherent criminality of the State, the Troubled Life of Keir Stalin and ask the question, is the West heading towards Civil War?

Correction: it was recorded on Easter Sunday, 20th April, 2025.

Anarchy defined:

1530s, “absence of government,” from French anarchie or directly from Medieval Latin anarchia, from Greek anarkhia “lack of a leader, the state of people without a government” (in Athens, used of the Year of Thirty Tyrants, 404 B.C., when there was no archon), abstract noun from anarkhos “rulerless,” from an- “without” (see an- (1)) + arkhos “leader” (see archon).

Voluntary Association – truth in contracts, no third party interloper, no deceptive dealings with each other, no fraud, only a Lawful agreement between the parties.

Notes:

1. The Golden Rule is joined at the hip to anarchy.
2. The genocide of Government – whether it be at home or abroad – your Government wants you dead.
3. Coercion is the modus operandi of Government.
4. Moneys plundered under threat of violence, then used to fund programmes at home (Divoc 91, for instance) and abroad (the genocide in Gaza is being funded by taxpayers) and, for all its DOGE moves towards dismantling the USAID funnelling of plunder towards ‘woke’ initiatives which the majority of the populace do not support.I also consider the allegations that Keir Stalin is in a homosexual relationship with the Mohammedan Lord Ali
5. Is ‘Kweer’ Starmer in a lavender marriage? In a wider sense, it could be reasonably asserted that the Labour Party is also in bed with the Mohammedans?
6. I consider further the long-held Lawful position that the claimant who was owed money had to provide the instrument of indebtedness, without which his claim would be dismissed. All of which is a far cry from the current state of the Legal system whereby HM’s courts will accept a dog-eared photocopy and falsely claim that proves the indebtedness.
7. How Religionists are essentially Statists by another name – after all, both believe in that which cannot be proven and certain groups are given privileged status. How can Starmer survive when his claim(s) to be a fit and proper PM have been demonstrably shown to be a pack of lies?
8. It is beyond doubt that Western countries are fractured by way of the incessant and ever-increasing plunder and the granting of special rights, privileges and immunities to certain groups, largely of an ethnic hue to the detriment of the Native Peoples.
9. In the light of which, the question arises – given the circumstances, are we heading towards civil war? The quoted article suggests that all the conditions are “nearing the ideal”, making it inevitable.

Perhaps it is already here, possibly in the form of an information war, a battle between the Truth and Lies?

Which side, ultimately, do you take in such circumstances – Anarchy or Statism?