TGBMS – an Update.

Good evening
I stumbled across your site by accident. I reported my Solicitor to SRA in 2016, not realising Search documents and the Bank Report on Title forms were all forgeries. When I discovered it was deliberate fraud I wrote to RBS pointing out the deliberate forgery of Searches and lies that the Solicitor had completed the Report on Title stating all Searches carried out and all ok. The RBS wrote back and stated nothing to do with them, I obviously misunderstand that RBS knowing of the real possibility of a Fraud have a duty to look into it?

I have ended up a LiP because the Solicitor has used the Courts and Costs to try to beat me off. To date they have failed. I have been allowed a late appeal to be submitted by 04/01/2019. I stated that Judge cannot have read Documents, as is really obvious now (only became so though when in July 2017 they asked me to prove where the Local Council Search Document came from, being ignorant of the actual meaning of “proof” I wrote back and said why ask me, you compiled and completed it. Then brain kicked in and I thought why? So I began to check the Search Application Docs and the Local Search Application had OS Licence year date (2002) we were buying in (2006), the OS Licence number tampered with and to cap it all the Coordinates given were for a house about 1/2 mile or more away in a different street! I immediately pointed this out. They ignored it. The SearchFlow “micro map” containing Confirmation of Plan and Searches ordered had been obfuscated and coordinates etc illegible. Cutting story short I applied to include Concealment of Fraud as that’s what he did from day one. Court refused my request to change claim even though no new evidence, apart from facts of docs being pointed out. Judge also refused my Application for Defendant to obtain a clean legible copy of SearchFlows confirmation despite fact that I’m legally allowed as document has been altered so is different document and that as we paid for searches also entitled to copy. I applied late for appeal because was waiting for transcript and also I had pointed out to Judge that I only received costs schedule posted day before at 3.15 post comes late here, the hearing was at 10 am next day. Also They had sent an electronic copy to the Court which was of course received in time! I believe was deliberate to use to shock me when ruling as to costs was against me. I believe the Judge was biased and had wrongly refused me the copy of SearchFlow document.

In mean time I sent a Part 18 letter and request for the actual Solicitor who did the work to answer the Questions as they were/are all in evidence from beginning. He used wrong Title Plan, two totally different copies of applications for searches and then registered the Correct Title Document which was a different Extent of Area confirming to RBS that all good! He has refused to answer anything or obtain a clean copy from SearchFlow.
I forgot to mention Following a visit to property before we bought a customer said he thought was a sewer running across, so I wrote and asked Solicitor to check it out as well as what was gate to next property for He wrote to Vendors askin about the “Gate” , but not asking about Sewer. He told my husband (now deceased that according to searches, as stated there was no sewer. He fortunately made a notation in his own handwriting “non according to searches”, which following my complaint I spotted when visited his office to look at file. He also had two post it phone notes of some other questions my husband was asking when he phoned Solicitor re our email about Sewer. So we carried on. Now I’ve discovered what was done I feel a chump for not spotting it, but he concealed it all. I’ll stop now as am supposed to be doing my Appeal for late appeal which has to be lodged in 04/01/2019 and am finding it more and more difficult so maybe I’m avoiding the task. I’m 71 next year and it’s not getting easier. Apologies for rambling.
Kind regards Geraldine Perring.