X’s Censorship Exposed
I have previously considered just how X is no different from any and all large social media platforms.
Whilst X is often promoted as the last bastion of freedom of speech, this position is unsustainable. As its former CEO, a certain Ms Yaccarino, stated, users will have,
Freedom of speech but not freedom of reach.
I previously wrote,
‘Twatter’, now known as X, was always a tittle-tattle platform, which back in 2013, was largely a vehicle for those who are fluent in epigrams, of whom the self-confessed-sodomite, Steven Fry was a classic example. Now it is primarily an echo-chamber of data-harvesting, nominally controlled by the Arch-Prince of Prats, Elon Musk, a puppet who wants to put an electronic chip in the brain, falsely claims to have launched his ridiculous motor-car into space and wants to colonise Mars.
In the same essay, I defined Limited Hangout as,
a social media platform that censors the writings, speech and/or reach of its users, often without them knowing
Whilst that is exactly how X operates and its machinations are explored in the accompanying video-essay, the term Limited Hangout comes from a previous epoch, long before the internet was released to the public:
The article above is from 1978. Notice what it has to say about the subject,
“
“The top of discussion was: What to do about recent revelations associating President Kennedy’s accused assassin, Lee Harvey Oswald, with the spy game played between the U.S. and USSR? … A decision was made, and a course of action determined. They were calculated to both fascinate and confuse the public by staging a clever “limited hangout” when the House Special Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) holds its open hearings, beginning later this month.
A “limited hangout” is spy jargon for a favourite and frequently used gimmick of the clandestine professionals. When their veil of secrecy is shredded and they can no longer rely on a phony cover story to misinform the public, they resort to admitting – sometimes even volunteering – some of the truth while still managing to withhold the key and damaging facts in the case. The public, however, is usually so intrigued by the new information that it never thinks to pursue the matter further.
We will probably never find out who masterminded the assassination of JFK – or why. There are too many powerful special interests connected with the conspiracy for the truth to come out even now, 15 years after the murder.
Inevitably, comparisons with the JFK and Charlie Kirk ‘assassinations’ will naturally arise, with the latter being different in so far as we now live in an epoch where social media and more access to the information lead to more and more questions being asked. The plethora of critical analysis unleashed by what Grok claims to be a “fictional assassination” are at such a level and the cover ups are similarly immense, with multiple videos of the event being analysed to the nth degree.
This essay is largely based on a ‘conversation’ with X’s AI, Grok and the answers are revealing for, ultimately, the ‘dialogue’ reaches the inevitable conclusion that X is a faux public forum, a tool for suppression and data gathering that is, without question, a limited hangout.
As I have stated regularly,
The Truth fears no Examination
which is why both organised religions, Mohammedism and Talmudism, go to such extreme lengths to defend their various claims to be superior to all others, to those whom they label and denounce as Infidels and Goyim.
Were they expressions of the Truth, then they would not be reliant upon phony expressions like
Islamophobia
and
Anti-semitism
when the truth is at a 180 degree variance to the facts. The notion of Anti-semiticism is founded entirely in the false belief that, historically, the Jewish people have been reviled on the basis that indigenous European populations have banished them simply because of irrational prejudice towards them. As the false phrase, Islamophobia, implies, criticism is not reasonable or applicable because it is tarred with the brush of prejudice – that those who critique any element of either mind-control programme are simply irrational and far right.
At which point the reader may well be reminded of the maxim,
In order to see who controls you, see who you are not permitted to criticise.
The multi-tentacled creature that is Zionism, has a far-reaching and firm hold on the ‘governments’ of both the United States and Great Britain, with the former held in the grip of AIPAC and the latter the Friends of Israel. Indeed, it is a proud boast of the Zionistas and the Mohammedans that they control those state entities, with the funding of individual politicians being an open secret and the criminal Labour government being dependent upon a variety of deals for votes with the a cotery of dodgy Islamic leaders, often in exchange for covering up the criminality of the Mohammed adherents, as exemplified by the industrial scale raping of British girls.
Follow the Money
The Zionistas at work in and out of the Rothschild fiefdom known as Israel have deep pockets and the shekels flow freely from the fraudulent financiers into the accounts of various groups, with Turning Point USA (TPUSA) being almost entirely funded from its very beginnings by Zionist interests. Charlie Kirk’s apparent break with his Zionist financiers meant that there arose a conflict of interests, so massive in their implications, that his handlers and the co-conspirators had him ‘disappeared’.
When one looks into the actual reasons why native Europeans so regularly expelled the Jews from their countries, it was not as a consequence of irrational prejudice towards them but invariably as a result of the criminal financial operations that they were running to their own advantage and to the detriment of the indigenous peoples. And, of course, on top of that there is the fact that, time after time, it was the treacherous Jewish individuals who colluded with the Muslim invaders to open the city gates for them, in exchange for the enslavement and subjugation of the women and children. All of which is not to say that there are other well-founded reasons for the regularity with which European peoples become somewhat disgruntled with their Jewish neighbours.
Any intelligent critque of these Jewish financiers’ criminality is robustly disallowed, whether it be the rise of the criminal mortgage racket from the original Jewish Shetar, the use of paper securities, the fraud of modern banking practices, money creation or even the criminal practice of coin clipping. These are facts born from the Truth, not created from an irrational fear and it is the Truth that they are so desperate to cover up for that is what they most they themselves are most terrified of.
From the Jewish financial support of William the Bastard’s invasion of 1066, to the imposition of the Shetar on the Icenii peoples of East Anglia, to the Expulsion of the Jews in 1290, to the action of Simon De Montfort, to the funding of Oliver Cromwell, to the founding of the Bank of England, to the admittance of non-Christians into Parliament, to the founding of the Federal Reserve, to the funding of the Bolsheviks and the slaughter of the First and Second World Wars, to the Balfour Declaration, to the establishment of the fake state of Israel etc, it is always the case that the indigenous populations become so angry at Jewish financial malpractice that the levels of discontent result in mass expulsions. All of which is not to say that there are other well-founded reasons for the regularity with which European peoples become somewhat disgruntled with their Jewish neighbours.
All of which reminds us that,
Those who fail to learn from history are destined to repeat it. On this occasion, I will leave the final word to Henry Ford, the producer of cars,
_______________________________________
As ever, thank you, dear reader, for your attention. If you are feeling appreciative, please chuck a few quid into the pot via the BuyMeACoffee button and/or taking out a paid subscription at my Substack page.
