Tag: #TheGreatBritishMortgageSwindle

#TGBMS – Knocking Down the Dominoes of Dogma

Defeating dogma has never been easy. On many occasions, the individual can become disheartened that his efforts appear to have come to nought. Taking my own experiences over the last 8 years, during which time I took on the government bank known as the Bradford and Bingley over my void mortgage and ended up being callously and criminally evicted, I can perfectly understand how and why such a state of mind may come about. The voice of my ego will tell me things like ‘it was all for nothing; you worked all those years for the house and now you have fuck all; you should have played the game; it was pointless to risk it all in a game which you could never win; the odds were stacked against you; it was hopeless from the beginning; look at you, penniless and for what point?’ etc.

At such times my self-criticising ego may bemoan the fact that this website doesn’t attract much interest and that no-one is paying attention to the work. This only serves to reinforce the egoic thinking that all the effort has indeed been pointless.

However, being essentially nihilistic in origin, such thinking does not serve me. The RogueMale site has never been about attracting huge numbers of people: the writings are often lengthy and therefore the audience for them is of a particular quality – namely those who are able to read fluently and with the required levels of discernment and critical thinking. It is a case of quality over quantity and it was ever thus.

Popularity is not something I have ever courted. It belongs to the world of the glib, the smooth operator and the one who seeks approval outside himself:

“… the neurotic anxiously seeks the esteem and affection of the largest number of people…”

Jacques Ellul, ‘Propaganda: the formation of Men’s Attitudes.’

The world is awash with psychological operations which stem from many sources, particularly religion and all forms of external governance. Most if not all of these ‘psy-ops’ are dependent upon the continued perpetration of untruths, lies that are repeated so often, they become accepted by the uncritical mind as being the truth. When those in (false) ‘authority’ repeat those lies, they operate as agents of dogma:

dogma

noun

a principle or set of principles laid down by an authority as incontrovertibly true: the Christian dogma of the Trinity | the rejection of political dogma.

 

ORIGIN

mid 16th cent.: via late Latin from Greek dogma ‘opinion,’ from dokein ‘seem good, think,’ from Greek dogmatikos “pertaining to doctrines,” from dogma (genitive dogmatos) “opinion, tenet,” literally “that which one thinks is true,” from dokein “to seem good, think” (from PIE root *dek- “to take, accept”). Related: Dogmatical (c. 1600).

As the discerning one knows, the truth is simply that which is so.

Dogma, as defined above, may be true but, more regularly, it is false.  As such it can be used to promote falsehoods. Interestingly, the fallacy of the appeal to authority is what often underpins a dogma, as can be exemplified by the religious dogmas relied upon by the Vatican (or other organised religions).

Throughout the pages of this website, it is stated that the Great British Mortgage Swindle is a fraud of monstrous proportions, that exists largely due to the inability of the people to understand just how it operates, both in terms of finance and the legal system.

Its operation is dependent upon the miseducation of the general populace (which thus has no ability to think critically) and the fake authorities that are used to shore up the swindle. However, its continued existence is hanging by a precarious thread, which is constantly unwinding as more and more of those people who are capable of critical thinking grasp the nature and the workings of the swindle. That unravelling thread is the pretence that the mortgage is lawful – that there has been consideration (an actual loan) on the part of the bank, that there has been a meeting of the minds of all parties (a necessary requirement for a valid contract to exist) and that every aspect of the ‘agreement’ has been disclosed. The absence of any one of which is enough to render the mortgage ‘agreement’ void ab initio.

Over the last 8 years I have taken part in or been present at many court hearings for (false) possession claims made by banks where the lawyers for the banks and the judges sweat their way through the proceedings, fumble for words and nervously shift in their seats due to the fact that they are being confronted with the truth of the matter:

  1. No loan has taken place – the credit (‘money’) for the purchase of the house was created out of thin air.
  2. The mortgage deed is void, a lie put to paper, fraudulently signed before any ‘advance’ has taken place and illegally executed before the ‘mortgagor’ was in possession of the house.
  3. There is no valid contract for a mortgage in place as required at law, signed by all parties.

These are the facts. They are not based on any fallacy. Indeed, any one who is able to point out any errors in fact or reason is invited to do so. The fact that no conveyancing solicitor ever points out the unlawful aspects of the mortgage agreement he is advising his client to enter renders the entire profession liable to a negligence claim once a mortgagor has sustained losses. That link demonstrates how one senior judge, Mr Ross Cranston, former solicitor general to the Labour government, took it upon himself – or, as is more likely the case, carried out instructions from his handlers –  to pervert the course of justice, just like all his cohorts did. It is fair to state that he was most nervous in the hearing as he went about shutting down a valid claim against the conveyancing solicitor and that his void judgement was pre-written (he did not retire to ‘deliberate’ but launched straight into it).

His extreme discomfort (and that of the legal profession and the British judiciary as a whole) was caused by his reliance upon dogma which flies in the face of the facts and reason. Dogma which exists as consequence of brainwashing (‘education’) and which blinds him and his ilk to the truth.

Thus, when presented with the facts, it is often the case that the judges will resort to the dogmatic expression,

“Well, you got the house didn’t you?”

Or, the solicitor will falsely claim that the mortgagor’s defence has “no basis in law”, often citing another such case where a miscarriage of justice took place as proof that the mortgagor’s claim is “hopeless”. Alternatively, the solicitor will falsely claim that the mortgagor is a ‘vexatious litigant’.

 

Thus it follows that both judge and solicitor are reliant upon dogma. The judiciary repeats the line in a desperate and underhand attempt to get the mortgagor into agreement that a loan took place (after all, if no loan took place then the entire proceedings are null and void and the bank is committing fraud by bringing the claim in the first place, with its CEO and minions all guilty of perjury too, for without consideration by the bank, there can be no valid contract and no money is due because no actual loan ever occurred).

A solicitor who defends a bank in such matters is totally dependent upon the fallacy known as the appeal to authority, a fake judicial authority that by failing to rule, time after time, upon the facts, has individually and collectively perverted the course of justice in order for the illusion to continue.

“It’s not what we don’t know that hurts us, it’s what we do know that isn’t so.”

The truth of this statement is plain and whilst it accurately applies to #TGBMS, it is applicable to any field of knowledge.

This aphorism is wholly applicable to the British Court System and all those banking acolytes and apologists who peddle the dogma that the 11.2 million mortgages in Britain are in any way valid.

Challenging its dogmas is a costly and demoralising exercise, for sure but it is necessary to do so in order that the racket may fall and, be sure of it, it will collapse for its roots are rotten to the core.

Rest assured, those dogma dominoes are there to be toppled and it only takes one finger from one individual to begin the fall. Roll on the release of the new and improved The Great British Mortgage Swindle, the film that is guaranteed to not just knock down the dominoes but obliterate them.

Finally, to all those who may be experiencing doubt and frustration over the state of the world today and the refusal of many to wake up to the tyranny that exists all around them, though your audience may be small and some may appear not to be listening, your efforts are worthwhile – keep knocking down the dominoes and never underestimate the power of what you do to have an effect.

TGBMS Links

Buy the DVD (https://thegreatbritishmortgageswindle.us20.list-manage.com/track/click?u=d15706cafc460fd76074a0069&id=3aa64175f0&e=483727ac6f)

Watch on Amazon Prime (https://thegreatbritishmortgageswindle.us20.list-manage.com/track/click?u=d15706cafc460fd76074a0069&id=d173e8fbab&e=483727ac6f)

Book Cinema Tickets (https://thegreatbritishmortgageswindle.us20.list-manage.com/track/click?u=d15706cafc460fd76074a0069&id=588e7d8966&e=483727ac6f)

Download Free PDF of TGBMS: Next Steps (https://thegreatbritishmortgageswindle.us20.list-manage.com/track/click?u=d15706cafc460fd76074a0069&id=464b61d3d1&e=483727ac6f)

Acknowledgements: Michael O’Bernicia for his vision and steadfast inspiration and David R for his unerring support and sponsorship of the work at RogueMale. Always appreciated, brothers. 

 

16

Thought for the day: End #TGBMS & free the People from debt slavery.

 

Make no mistake, when a small group of determined individuals stand up to tyranny, there is an effect.

8 years ago, I took on the might of the Rothschild Banking Monopoly by making a counter claim in Nottingham County Court against the Bradford and Bingley who had begun false possession proceedings against my home of 15 years:

RM’S STOLEN HOME, MARCH 2011.

 

That counter claim was grounded on 4 basic principles:

  1. There was no valid contract, signed by all parties.
  2. The bank could not prove a loan had taken place and that I had not funded the purchase via the ‘promise to pay’, made by way of the (void) mortgage deed.
  3. There was no full disclosure at the time of the alleged agreement as to how the alleged ‘loan’ was created.
  4. There was no consideration from the bank; which voided the purported agreement.

Each of the above elements form the basis of the multi-levelled  Great British Mortgage Swindle. The battle for my home raged on for some 16 months and was falsely termed by Richard Inglis, the then circuit judge at Nottingham,  as “scandalous”, when the real scandal is the very existence of The Great British Mortgage Swindle.

It is no exaggeration to state that the resistance was a source of inspiration to others and that the resulting groundswell of support rose to a magnificent level when hundreds of people turned up on July 23, 2014 and January 23, 2015 in support of the Crawford Family who were similarly defrauded by the same bank:

THE PEOPLE: TAKING NO SHIT, THE CRAWFORDS HOME, CARLTON, NOTTINGHAM 23 JULY 2014.

As we know, the only way the Crawfords were defeated was the same way I was – the police, the courts and the bank colluded in what was termed ‘Operation Hooper’ that only succeeded because of deception and criminality.

8 years on from when I stepped into court to defend my home against the false possession claim,  and one can see the effect of such resistance: mortgage repossessions are manifestly down. People are going into the courts and challenging the false possession claims against their homes to the point where:

“The Ministry of Justice has released data (which) shows that the number of annual mortgage repossessions enforced by the courts fell from around 25,000 to under 5,000, during the six year production period of TGBMS, a film which chronicles the struggles of the very people who made that happen.”  source

Quite rightly, much is made about the decline in British standards of living. Much is made about ‘austerity’. Much is made about the lack of jobs. Much is made about the fact that many young people cannot afford to buy their own homes.

The solution? Demolish the mortgage system. Cage the bankers responsible. And, thus,  free the people from having to pay extortion moneys to keep a roof over their heads.

To do so would result in the people being free. Free to be creative. Free to spend more money in the local and national economy, thereby providing the country with a massive boost to its productivity.

If that sounds over-simplified, then so be it. The fact is, people are living under a yoke of fake debt. Everyone, no matter where they may dwell is living in a condition of hyper-inflation, whereby housing costs (rent or mortgage) have increased exponentially over our life times, a fact which is hidden from all the ‘cost of living’ statistics. By way of illustration, when RM was a student in the mid-eighties, a ‘studio’ or bedsit could be rented for between £12 and £18 per week. The same would now be at least £100 per week. As ever, the only ones who benefit from such an iniquitous state of affairs are those who operate as bankers and a control system which seeks to subjugate the people.

How many will it take? As many as is necessary. Each day more and more wake up to the tyranny. For those who feel the task is hopeless, let us remember: never underestimate the power of a determined few to bring about change.

TGBMS Links

Buy the DVD (https://thegreatbritishmortgageswindle.us20.list-manage.com/track/click?u=d15706cafc460fd76074a0069&id=3aa64175f0&e=483727ac6f)

Watch on Amazon Prime (https://thegreatbritishmortgageswindle.us20.list-manage.com/track/click?u=d15706cafc460fd76074a0069&id=d173e8fbab&e=483727ac6f)

Book Cinema Tickets (https://thegreatbritishmortgageswindle.us20.list-manage.com/track/click?u=d15706cafc460fd76074a0069&id=588e7d8966&e=483727ac6f)

Download Free PDF of TGBMS: Next Steps (https://thegreatbritishmortgageswindle.us20.list-manage.com/track/click?u=d15706cafc460fd76074a0069&id=464b61d3d1&e=483727ac6f)

 

___________________________________________________________

Acknowledgements: as ever, David R, for his continued support, which is greatly appreciated.

Anyone who is appreciative of the work of this site and is generous enough to make a donation is invited to do so, via the donation button.

In the alternative, one may choose to tip RM some Bitcoin, at 1Fs6HGdQE2Nbd1QtvpSs2iJcz2aHHaknLE.

 

 

3

Banking & Electioneering: Frigging in the Rigging

The Rothschilds, their Polipuppets and the Fraud of the General Election

A Punch & Judy Show: Corbyn & May

Let’s face facts – the ‘snap’ election scheduled for 8th June, 2017 is nothing more than a sophisticated puppet show, the result of which will be rigged in favour of those who control the marionettes who operate on the stage known as the House of Commons. These marionettes are collectively known as politicians. However, a more suitable expression may be ‘polipuppet’, which for the purposes of clarity can be defined thus:

polipuppet |ˌpolipupett|

noun

a life-long actor who obediently and professionally plays the role of a political party representative, and is controlled by the House of Rothschild and/or its agencies.

  • Margaret Thatcher was a British polipuppet whose decimation of the country’s industry was carried out under the instructions of N. M. Rothschild.

ORIGIN

21st century English: from Old French politique ‘political,’ via Latin from Greek politikos, from politēs ‘citizen,’ from polis ‘city’ and ‘puppet’ mid 16th cent. (denoting a doll): later form of poppet, generally having a more unfavourable connotation.

In the same way the life-long actor known as Donald Trump was falsely presented as a maverick candidate who was inserted to quell the rising tide of nationalism amongst an awakening American populace (who merely voted for a new CEO of the USA Corporation) both May and Corbyn will be offered up as ‘solutions’ to the problems facing the UK Corporation.

Puppets on Strings

The puppet show will serve a number of purposes, each of which is beneficial to the hidden hand that controls the fake ‘state’, the main ones being the ‘divide and rule’ agenda and the continuation of the fraud of the banks.

It is now an established fact that the banks do not lend anything and are in the business of buying securities like loan agreements and mortgages to create streams of credit, made-up figures, literally created on a computer. On the back of these fake loans, for which, obviously, there is no consideration on the part of the banks, people’s homes are being stolen by way of void possession orders, issued by a judiciary that has been instructed to maintain the pretence that moneys are owed.

“You got the money to buy the house, didn’t you?”

being the increasingly unsophisticated argument posed by any judge who is forced to go anywhere near the fact that no loan ever took place.

Of course, it is not only individuals who are paying out on fake loans, under the pretence that money is owed; it is also the local councils who have taken out the long term ‘loans’ known as LOBOs.

In any event, the effect is the same – the individual is coerced into picking up the tab for the fake debt. Thus, council tax payers are facing rises in payments in order to service the criminal interest rates piled on top of the fake loans. Services are being cut as a direct consequence. It is fair to state that the banks are like parasites that have infested the private and public bodies of the people. They bleed us dry as they simultaneously fill their vaults with ill-gotten gains.

To charge interest is usury and under the ancient law of these lands, usury is unlawful – and,  for good reason.

To charge interest on fictitious loans is nothing less than criminal.

It all amounts to the people being subjected to a pernicious form of indentured servitude, or slavery by another name. So much for “Rule, Britannia, Britons never will be slaves.”

The answer as to how they have been getting away with it for so long may well lie in the miseducation and general dumbing down that the people have been subjected to over the last 150 years or so and, of course, the fake news media, whose purpose is to promulgate the status quo.

The notion that the polipuppets known as May or Corbyn, both of whom have sworn an oath to the Privy Council, a vow never to hear any criticism of ‘the Crown’, are actually in charge of the ‘nation’ is, in the light of the facts, utterly ludicrous to any one with a fully functioning brain and knowledge of financial operations.

The fact is that, just as all around the world bar – an increasingly small number of sovereign nations – the whole rotten edifice of this indentured servitude is controlled by the House of Rothschild, a family of pernicious financial parasites that has ruled the roost for at least 200 years in the Britain alone.

The Rothschild family claims to be Jewish.  Its tentacles extend into every aspect of our lives, all around the world.

Prior to 1858, it was unlawful for a non Christian to sit in the House of Commons on the basis that he would be unable to swear his allegiance to God and the people whom he was supposed to be serving. The law was changed in order to allow Lionel de Rothschild to take up a position:

“1847: Lionel De Rothschild now married to the daughter of his uncle, Kalmann (Carl) Mayer Rothschild, is elected to the parliamentary seat for the City of London.

 

A requirement for entering parliament was to take an oath in the true faith of a Christian. Lionel De Rothschild refused to do this as he was Jewish and his seat in parliament remained empty for 11 years until new oaths were allowed.  He must have been an invaluable representative for his constituency, bearing in mind he could never vote on any bill as he never entered parliament!  I wonder how he managed to keep his parliamentary seat for 11 years?”

 

“1858: Lionel De Rothschild finally takes his seat in parliament when the requirement to take an oath in the true faith of a Christian is broadened to include other oaths. He becomes the first Jewish member of the British parliament.”

 

“1891: The British Labour Leader (newspaper) makes the following statement on the subject of the Rothschilds,

 

“This blood-sucking crew has been the cause of untold mischief and misery in Europe during the present century, and has piled up its prodigious wealth chiefly through fomenting wars between States which ought never to have quarrelled.

 

Whenever there is trouble in Europe, wherever rumours of war circulate and men’s minds are distraught with fear of change and calamity you may be sure that a hook-nosed Rothschild is at his games somewhere near the region of the disturbance.”

 

Comments like this worry the Rothschilds and towards the end of the 1800’s they purchase Reuters news agency so they can have some control of the media. Source

In his book, “None Dare Call It Conspiracy” (1973), Gary Allen states,

“One major reason for the historical blackout on the role of the international bankers in political history is the Rothschilds were Jewish…The Jewish members of the conspiracy have used an organisation called The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) as an instrument to try and convince everyone that any mention of the Rothschilds and their allies is an attack on all Jews.

 

In this way they have stifled almost all honest scholarship on international bankers and made the subject taboo within universities.

 

Any individual or book exploring this subject is immediately attacked by hundreds of ADL communities all over the country. The ADL has never let the truth or logic interfere with its highly professional smear jobs…

 

Actually, nobody has a right to be more angry at the Rothschild clique than their fellow Jews… The Rothschild empire helped finance Adolf Hitler.”

 

By 1868, Benjamin Disraeli had become the first Jewish Prime Minister of Britain.

“Jews, like other religious minorities, received equal rights over a century ago, beginning with formal Jewish Emancipation in 1858, at which point Lionel de Rothschild was allowed to sit in the House of Commons after the law restricting the oath of office to Christians was changed, the ministry said.”

Source: Extracts from “Jewish World” by Itamar Eichner (published 09.11.2006).

In more recent times, the Thatcherite government’s dismantling of British industry in the 1980s and beyond was manipulated by the House of Rothschild:

“N. M. Rothschild & Sons advise the British government on the privatisation of British Gas. They subsequently advise the British government on virtually all of their other privatisations of state owned assets including: British Steel; British Coal; all the British regional electricity boards; and all the British regional water boards.

 

A British MP heavily involved in these privatisations is future Chancellor of the Exchequer, Norman Lamont, a former Rothschild banker.” source

 

“It is quite extraordinary the number of privatisation troughs that N. M. Rothschild has got its snout into: British Telecom, Britoil, British Gas, Royal Ordnance, British Airways, Rolls Royce, British Airports Authority, British Petroleum, British steel, water, regional electricity, Northern Ireland electricity, British coal, the list goes on and on. The chancellor, Norman Lamont, and the economic secretary, Anthony Nelson both used to work for N. M. Rothschild. ” — Private Eye on Thatcherism, April 1993

All of which amounts to the inescapable fact that the ‘Government’ of Britain is controlled by the hidden hand of the ‘Money Changers’, who operate through the Council on Foreign Relations and other controlled offshoots such as the Fabian Party.

The Rothschild dominated agencies of control.

Think the Rothschilds have nothing to do with the Labour Party?  Think again: the spymaster of Mi5, the double agent, Victor Rothschild, sat in the Lords on the Labour benches:

“In 1937, he inherited his title from his uncle, Walter Rothschild, who was the 2nd Baron Rothschild and thereafter sat as a Labour party peer in the House of Lords. During the Second World War, he was recruited by MI5 and was awarded the George medal for his work.” Source: www.maccabi.com.au/News/283/A-history-of-Jewish-first-class-cricketers.cfm

Our so-called ‘culture’ has been controlled from the ‘top’ down, infected by a variety of social engineering projects (viruses), many of which have sprung from the Tavistock Institute, to such a degree that we live in times of widespread degeneracy and under a yoke of financial enslavement. It has recently been termed ‘weaponised anthropology’, or the engineering of mankind’s psychology.

Rest assured, whichever ‘party’ gets elected to ‘government’ on 08 June, the result will have been engineered, with the voting rigged in strict accordance with the wishes of the aforementioned ‘controllers’. The not-so-hidden hand of the House of Rothschild.

The greatest swindle of all time has been perpetuated by these parasitic deceivers; for over 200 years they have held guard to the hidden mechanics of the creation of a fiat currency system. A fiat currency that is issued by their licenced mandarins as debt, a fiat currency that is printed in note form by the private Bank of England (and every other so-called ‘central bank’ in the world).

However, the game is up. The claim made by the Rothschild Bank in London during the American Civil War (which they funded) in a letter to its New York agents that:

“The few who understand the system will either be so interested in its profits, or so dependent on its favours that there will be no opposition from that class, while on the other hand, the great body of people, mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous advantages that capital derives from the system, will bear its burdens without complaint, and perhaps without even suspecting the system is inimical to their interests.”

is as hollow now as it ever was.

 

Thanks to the likes of Professor Richard Werner, the facts are becoming ever clearer:

Interviewer: “You’re firmly of the view that banks create money out of thin air?”

 

Richard Werner (RW): “ Yes, I’ve produced the first empirical studies to prove that in the 5 thousand year history of banking. Banks don’t take deposits and banks don’t lend money.

 

“So what is a deposit? A deposit is not actually a deposit; it’s not a bailment, it’s not held in custody. At law, the word deposit is meaningless.

 

The law courts and various judgements have made it very clear: if you give your money to a bank, even though it’s called a deposit, this money is simply a loan to the bank. So, there is no such thing as deposit: it’s a loan to the bank.

 

“So, banks borrow from the public – that much we’ve established.

 

“What about lending? Surely, they’re lending money? No, they don’t. Banks don’t lend money. Again, at law, they’re in the business of purchasing securities. That’s it. So you say, don’t confuse me with all that legalese, I want a loan. Fine, here’s the loan contract, here’s the offer letter and you sign.

 

“At law, it’s very clear: you have issued a security, namely a promissory note and that bank is going to purchase that – that’s what’s happened.”

 

RT – “ Put it in layman’s terms – what does that mean?”

 

RW “ it means that what the bank is doing is very different from what it presents to the public that it’s doing.

 

“How does this fit together?

 

“You say, fine, the bank purchases my promissory note but how do I get my money? I don’t care about the details, I want my money.

 

“The bank will say, well, you’ll find it in your account. That would be technically correct. If they say we’ll transfer it to your account, that’s wrong because no money is transferred at all, from anywhere inside the bank  or outside the bank. Why? Because what we call a deposit is simply the bank’s record of its debt to the public. Now, it also owes you money and its record of the money it owes you is what you think you are getting as money and that’s all it is.

 

“And that is how the banks create the money supply; the money supply consists to 97% of bank deposits and these are created out of nothing by banks when they ‘lend’ because they invent fictitious customer deposits. Why?

 

“They simply re-state, slightly incorrectly in accounting terms, that there’s an account payable liability arising out of the loan contract which is your promissory note as a customer deposit but nobody has deposited any money. I wonder how the FCA deals with this because in the financial sector, you’re supposed to not mislead your customers.”

Source: Russia Today interview, 07 March, 2017:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EC0G7pY4wRE

“The House of Rothschild is really at the top of the pyramid of power. They are behind the New World Order and the complete domination of the world agenda. They are behind the European Union and the Euro and they are behind the idea of a North American Union and the Amero. They are controlling all of the world’s secret services and their private army is NATO.”  Source

The fact is that no polipuppet, whether it be Corbyn, May, Macron or Trump, will go anywhere near this issue of the fraud of money creation and the over-arching control of the people by way of the indentured servitude. The referenced Financial Service Authority (FSA) is as toothless an entity as the CPS which has recently declined to prosecute the Tory polipuppets who committed demonstrable election fraud in 2015. The system is rigged from top to bottom but, as long as the people are mired in the false belief that the banks are owed money and that there is a national or private ‘debt’ to be paid, it will continue to limp on.

The Rothschilds’ Bank of International Settlements (BIS) – used to exonerate its members from any criminality.

However, given the fact that the fiat money system the Rothschilds’ control is based on the sweat equity of the people via the ‘promise to pay’ and that there is nothing to prevent the people from creating their own currencies and lines of credit (as evidenced by the rise of Bitcoin), its continued dominance is precarious.

It is a system of control that is only as strong as its weakest links, of which there are many.

______________________________________________

Acknowledgments to the excellent work of Richard Werner and the HumansAreFree website for its comprehensive documentation of the Rothschild history.

Special acknowledgments: to long-time supporter, Jan Bogusz, who passed away last month, David R for his continued sponsorship and  Erik S for his donation last month. Thank-you, gents, it’s most appreciated.

Anyone who wishes to support the work of RM is kindly directed to the donate button on this page.

 

6

THE BANKING CON – A STARK REMINDER

The Immorality of Banking –  a plain tale

Of Old King Coal, fake LOBO loans and illusory debt, exposed to the bones.

I have written many times about the fraudulent nature of the banking system;  I have even fallen prey to its genocidal ways and co-produced a film about it, TGBMS.  I’m not going to stop writing about it either, so long as it is necessary to expose its immoral machinations for what they are.

Money and its creation is the world’s biggest religion. It holds everyone in thrall.  It is a racket that permeates every aspect of our lives, no matter which level of so-called society we find ourselves at.

As Michael of Bernicia states in the trailer to the aforementioned film,

‘What would you do if you knew that every bank loan was a complete and utter fraud? That the banking industry is a huge con?”

Some might, quite understandably, take the view that he who has been tricked deserves to be tricked. After all, if he was unable to see through the con trick at the time it was played, then more fool he. Were we not warned via the programming of the brand known as Shakespeare, to be wary of usury and Jewish money lenders (The Merchant of Venice)? Was it not laid out clearly to us in Hamlet? –

Neither a borrower nor a lender be,

For loan oft loses both itself and friend,

And borrowing dulls the edge of husbandry.

Hamlet Act 1, scene 3, 75–77

And what of Jesus overturning the money-changers’ tables in the temple?

When everyone and everything is in hock to the banksters, one cannot help but think, how did it get to this? The history of banking, its use of fiat currencies, of usury and the hidden practices of credit creation via the honourable promise to pay are there to be explored by the critical thinker and it behoves him to do so at the earliest opportunity.

How and why so many fail to understand the fraud that is committed by the banks every minute of every day is a question which can be answered by a brief examination of the state’s deliberate policy of dumbing down the population via its programme of mass schooling. Notice I state schooling and not education, which is something completely different.

Schools exist not to liberate the individual and inspire him to become whatever he so chooses to be but, rather, have been created to deliberately dumb down the people into a collective mass of stupidity which neither knows of nor cares to understand the matrix of deceit that has been constructed around it. Standardised tests measure the ability to regurgitate information – it is the Frankfurt School of thought whereby shit in equals shit out. The masses are effectively dumbed down and those who can parrot, without question, the information they have been fed are rewarded with the jobs in ‘human resource’ organisation and other low grade service sector positions of management. They are paid according to how well they tow the line. They are not paid to think:

“Mass dumbness is vital to modern society. The dumb person is wonderfully flexible clay for psychological shaping by market research, government policymakers; public-opinion leaders, and any other interest group. The more pre-thought thoughts a person has memorized, the easier it is to predict what choices he or she will make. What dumb people cannot do is think for themselves or ever be alone for very long without feeling crazy. That is the whole point of national forced schooling; we aren’t supposed to be able to think for ourselves because independent thinking gets in the way of “professional” think-ing, which is believed to follow rules of scientific precision.” John Taylor Gatto, The Tyranny Of Compulsory Schooling

Few of us escape this tyranny and its effectiveness is amply demonstrated by those who are most supplicant to the collectivist mindset: politicians of all hues.

Politicians are not only incapable of thinking and acting outside the fake paradigms of the state, they are jointly and singularly, notoriously self-serving. It doesn’t take much research to demonstrate that fact.

Yet the pretence that they are there to serve the people continues to linger.

It is their self-serving egoic modus operandi that leaves them wide open for manipulation by the deep government that controls the puppet show commonly known as politics, a theatre where ego abounds and honour is dead.

Can we imagine how things might be if those who work in the political field actually did so with the interests of the people at heart, rather than the promotion of state-corporate-collectivist agendas? A collection of individuals who were not subject to the fake left-right paradigms?

Whilst I remain dubious of any politician and his intentions, I was pleasantly surprised by Donald Trump’s support of the coal miners, which can be read about here.

Imagine if a British leader came forward like Trump and announced legislation that brought back the mining industry and its associated industry?

“It is time to acknowledge that the decision to close the coal mines was a catastrophe for the people of this nation. Communities were destroyed, families torn apart and the nation’s independence was compromised to such an extent that we now have foreign companies purportedly owning much of the country’s power industry. It is time to reverse that. The rich coal seams that exist across the lands and off shore will be reopened and an associated power generation scheme will mean the establishment of efficient, non-polluting energy.

 

In the meantime, we will also be funding alternative sources of generating electricity via Tesla technology and over-unity devices that will serve to resurrect the latent steel and engineering industries, which have similarly suffered over the last 5 decades.

 

Engineering will once more come to the fore in the isles of Britain, after all, we have a rich history of invention and innovation. The government will no longer be taking up fake loans from the usual coterie of Rothschild dominated banks. Instead, the Great British Pound will be printed by the treasury, free and clear of usury, which is to be outlawed in accordance with the ancient laws of these lands. Community banks will be established and special funds created for the commencement and revival of these industrial initiatives. No longer will we be held to ransom by the private interests of the Bank of England and its associated licenced minions in the credit industry.”

Could you imagine the stooge May doing it? Or even the Fabian puppet Corbyn? Would that happen under the current political regime?

Not a chance.

And yet, the coal reserves underground and off-shore around |the British Isles remain substantial enough to reestablish the self-sufficiency in power production that was until only recently a hallmark of these lands.

“There are vast coal resources beneath parts of Yorkshire, Nottinghamshire, Lincolnshire and NE Leicestershire (henceforth referred to as the Yorkshire-Nottinghamshire Coalfield). This coalfield has been extensively and intensively exploited for hundreds of years, particularly since the industrial revolution. Over 400 collieries were open at its peak in the late 19th and early part of the 20th Century. Over the centuries mining has gradually advanced to the east, exploiting progressively deeper seams. Nottinghamshire’s pits were some of the deepest in the country. For example, Bevercotes (opened in the 1960s but now closed) and Harworth have shafts more than 1000 m deep.” source

Following the brutal destruction of the coal mining industry by the Thatcher government, the country is left in the ridiculous position whereby,

“Currently 40% of the electricity we use is generated from coal-fired power stations and UK Coal supplies the fuel that makes 4% of the country’s electricity. This means that 70% of the coal used to generate the nation’s energy is imported from places such as Russia, America and Colombia.” source

So, a country that was self-sufficient in coal just a generation ago is now dependent upon imports simply because a draconian government fraudulently auctioned off the industry to the carpet baggers? Is that not an extreme state of affairs?

Indeed, we currently live in an extreme state, where ‘Benefit fraud’ leads to jail. But banking fraud? Where does that lead?  Usually, a cover up or a slap on the wrist fine for whichever bank has been caught operating fraudulently, wth the proceeds ending up who knows where, but most likely in her Maj’s Treasury. That is extremism personified.

“In 2009, James Crosby admitted that HBOS had engaged in High Risk lending and putting client funds at risk – and the SFO reported “over $200 million still missing and unaccounted for” in their Press release in 2008 – huge moneys,still not found!  This is demonstrably because of Fraud at the Board level of HBOS PLC (James Crosby was the FCA’s deputy chairman at the material time engaging in insider dealing it appears, and pulling strings – with no punishment for these gross violations of Public trust).” E Watson.

Anyone who does not believe the banks are effectively acting as the deep state would do well to note this:

 “Brzezinski, co-founder of the Trilateral Commission and David Rockefeller’s intellectual flunkey: “The nation state as a fundamental unit of man’s organised life has ceased to be the principal creative force: International banks and multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation-state.”

For now, at least, the banks are running it. The Great British Mortgage Swindle is an example of how the banks steal money via the very homes we live in and the LOBO loans taken out by many councils from c. 2003 to 2012 are another stark example.

Lender option borrower option or lender’s option borrower’s option (LOBO) is a long term borrowing instrument available in the United Kingdom. They involve periodic interest re-fixings, which incorporates two linked options:

 

lender’s option: option for the lender to set revised (usually higher) interest rates at predetermined interest reset dates such as annually.

 

borrower’s option: linked option for the borrower (exercisable only if the lender’s option is exercised) to pay the revised interest rate or to redeem the bond although that may involve exit fees.

 

They are provided by banks and the loan contract runs for between 40 and 70 years. There is no regulatory body responsible for overseeing their use … Campaign group Debt Resistance UK researched LOBOs using the Freedom of Information Act.Banks, such as Barclays and Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS), provide LOBO loans to about 240 UK councils (63% of all councils in 2013) with a total value of £15 billion. Out of this £15 billion it is estimated that about £1 billion in upfront profits was made by the lenders. LOBOs are currently almost a fifth of all council borrowing.

 

LOBOs were recommended to councils by specialist financial advisers who, unknown to the council, were in turn paid commission by the banks providing the LOBOs.

 

At least 12 councils have the most expensive types of LOBO loan. Most of these have “inverse floaters” taken out with RBS – interest rates for the loan are increased if general bank lending rates decrease.

 

As a direct consequence of making repayments on LOBOs, councils have had to make major cuts in services to their residents. It has been calculated that if councils were free to relinquish their LOBO contracts at no penalty and instead borrow at a more typical market rate it would save them about £145 million for 2015 alone. Some councils are considering taking legal action.  source

For instance, take Kirklees Council in West Yorkshire: this comment from the local newspaper summarises it neatly:

“Kirklees have L.O.B.O loans for £500 million to be repaid in the future, you are paying £4 million a year interest, you seem reluctant to mention this. I suggest everybody googles lobo loans and and Kirklees liability it makes interesting reading.” source

Interest payments on the purported loans are taken to service the debt directly from the people via unlawful council tax. A fake debt at that. Just like a mortgage. No consideration by the banks. No disclosure as to how the credit is created and disguised as a ‘loan’.

Huddersfield Town Hall.

Little wonder said council has just added 10% to its council tax bills. The politicians who took out the loans have fecked up and the ‘tax payer’ is footing the ever rising ‘bill’:

“Hear Hear I have tried to get the Kirklees L.O.B.O. loans mentioned in the Examiner in the past but the subject seems to be taboo, but they are one of the main reasons why Kirklees is in such dire financial straits, with massive interest repayments and no accounting for what these loans were used for!”

 

“Well said David, my estimate of £500m is on the conservative side for 30yrs interest, couple this with £500m unsecured pension liabilities and Kirklees has a future deficit of 1Trillion. Perhaps unqualified Sheard and Turner would care to comment?” source

 

Read more on LOBO loan swindle here and here.

These LOBO loans are widespread:

“Newham council, Labour 60 / 60, took out 27 loans at a face value of £563m which now cost £959m. Sir Robert Andrew “Robin” Wales is Mayor on £80,029 / year and oversaw a £111m project to relocate council offices, including £18.7m of design and refurbishment costs.”

 

Update: “Britain’s most enthusiastic council for taking out Lobo loans, Newham, has ditched the scheme saving up to £100 million.

Newham has agreed with its lender, thought to be Barclays, to overhaul £248.5 million of Lobo loans — an acronym for lender option borrower option — and move to traditional fixed-rate borrowing.

It will save £1.6 million a year over an almost 60-year period, or £94 million in total.” source

The bottom line? If one borrows something, then one has to give it back. Whether it be a lawn mower, a hole punch or someone’s pet chimp, it has to be returned to its owner. Simple.

The councils who took out these false loans have had to make massive cutbacks in public services just to keep up on the interest payments – repayments can run for 40 to 70 years.

It is yet another massive swindle.

The corollary of this is plain. Did you borrow anything? If not, then you are under no moral obligation  to ‘pay it back’. How could you be?

It is a question of morality. How much fecking clearer can it get?

If no actual loan takes place, then how can you pay it back?  And that point applies to councils and companies just as much as it applies to individuals. The LOBO loans have lead to cut backs in museum and library services, to name but two in Kirklees alone.  And all because the fake loans and their criminal interest rates have to be ‘serviced’.

Says who? Do they really have to serviced?

Someone with balls would do well to demand that the usual suspects, Barclays and Royal Bank Scotland actually prove they made a loan from their own coffers and that the credit extension was not simply created via a few strokes on a computer keyboard. All loans are created out of thin air!

If it is simply an extension of credit, facilitated by the administrative procedures of the bank, then from where does the moral obligation come to ‘pay it back’? Nothing has been loaned. No deposits, bank or customers – the loan has been created out of nothing. It is merely a conjuring trick.

The Icelandic peoples demonstrated what happens when the banksters are told, in no uncertain terms, to feck off with their fake debts. When will a British Council do the same?  The game is up and it is surely only a matter of time before the whole rotten edifice of the banking racket crumbles and falls away.

FOOTNOTES

Britain’s considerable coal reserves:

http://www.nmrs.org.uk/mines-map/coal-mining-in-the-british-isles/

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2593032/Coal-fuel-UK-centuries-Vast-deposits-totalling-23trillion-tonnes-North-Sea.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/energy/10885210/Scotland-sitting-on-vast-coal-reserves-miner-says.html

Acknowledgements: thanks to Steve K for his kind donation and, as ever, David R for his continued support of the work at RogueMale.

Anyone wishing to show his appreciation of the site is encouraged to do so via the Paypal link. Many thanks.

1

THE PLUNDER & GENOCIDE OF EVICTION.

CML REVEAL ONE MILLION BRITISH PEOPLE GENOCIDED BY EVICTION SINCE 2008.

#TGBMS – HOW LONG BEFORE THE BRITISH MIDDLE CLASSES WAKE UP TO THE FACT THEY’RE BEING SWINDLED?

EXPOSING THE SWINDLE: IF YOU’RE MIDDLE CLASS & NOT ANGRY YET, THEN YOU’D BETTER START PAYING ATTENTION.

RM has written previously about how eviction is an act of genocide. Most right thinking individuals will regard Israel’s evictions of the Palestinian peoples and the violent theft of their lands as genocide but few will stop to consider how the British Establishment is similarly engaging in acts of genocide against its own people across these lands. Before continuing, the reader, if he isn’t already aware of it, should consider the contents of these articles – here and here.

An eviction is also an act of plunder, carried out by agents of the state, which in turn, is controlled by the Banksters – a provably criminal cadre, operating under the aegis of the House of Rothschild.

plunder |ˈpləndər|

verb [ with obj. ]

steal goods from (a place or person), typically using force and in a time of war or civil disorder: looters moved into the disaster area to plunder stores | [ no obj. ] : the invaders were back and ready to plunder.

• steal (goods), typically using force and in a time of disorder.

• take material from (artistic or academic work) for one’s own purposes: we shall plunder related sciences to assist our research.

noun

the violent and dishonest acquisition of property: the farmers suffered the inhumanity and indignities of pillage and plunder.

• property acquired illegally and violently: the army sacked the city and carried off huge quantities of plunder.

DERIVATIVES

plunderer |ˈplənd(ə)rər| noun

ORIGIN

mid 17th cent.: from German plündern, literally ‘rob of household goods,’ from Middle High German plunder ‘household effects.’ Early use of the verb was with reference to the Thirty Years’ War (1618–48), reflecting German usage; on the outbreak of the English Civil War in 1642, the word and activity were associated with the forces under Prince Rupert.

When we do not learn the lessons of history, we are destined to repeat them. Frederick Bastiat was an eloquent historian and philosopher who knew this all too well. He writes not of theory but of facts. When a government and its judiciary are engaged in acts of plunder against its peoples, the results, as demonstrated time and time again by history, are palpable. The facts are stark.

Frederick Bastiat
Frederick Bastiat

 

“No legal plunder: This is the principle of justice, peace, order, stability, harmony, and logic. Until the day of my death, I shall proclaim this principle with all the force of my lungs (which alas! is all too inadequate).”

“The Results of Legal Plunder

It is impossible to introduce into society a greater change and a greater evil than this: the conversion of the law into an instrument of plunder.

What are the consequences of such a perversion? It would require volumes to describe them all. Thus we must content ourselves with pointing out the most striking.

In the first place, it erases from everyone’s conscience the distinction between justice and injustice.

No society can exist unless the laws are respected to a certain degree. The safest way to make laws respected is to make them respectable. When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law. These two evils are of equal consequence, and it would be difficult for a person to choose between them.

The nature of law is to maintain justice. This is so much the case that, in the minds of the people, law and justice are one and the same thing. There is in all of us a strong disposition to believe that anything lawful is also legitimate. This belief is so widespread that many persons have erroneously held that things are “just” because law makes them so. Thus, in order to make plunder appear just and sacred to many consciences, it is only necessary for the law to decree and sanction it. Slavery, restrictions, and monopoly find defenders not only among those who profit from them but also among those who suffer from them.”  SOURCE

We are living in such times. If any one doubts this, then they are not paying attention. The following image of the Tory Cabinet serves as a wake up call to any one who doubts we are living under a kleptocracy of the most obvious kind. Each of the cabinet members is a millionaire. Quite how and why each believes himself to be suited to govern over others is left to the reader to speculate but it is plain to state such individuals have no care or interest in the well-being of the people of these lands.

tory-cabinet-27-millionaires

In the meantime, the masses of people are distracted by a sting operation which hits a number of men who are involved in the circus of distraction known as football.

I write at a time when the British press is agog over a series of sting operations performed by undercover Daily Telegraph ‘journalists’ on a number of British football managers and coaches. The secretly filmed episodes invariably reveal a world of bungs, hidden player ownership by third parties, overpaid footballers, inflated salaries and out-of-control egos. Sam Allardyce is, thus far, the biggest fish to be caught in the net.

Many have been stating for years that corruption lies at the heart of Britain’s ‘national sport’ and this sting operation is the proof of it: it amounts to plunder:

“The fragmented cartel of corrupting forces destroying the integrity of British football are making a fortune out of their systemic conspiracy.

Contacts within FIFA, UEFA, the bookmaking sectors of SE Asia and Europe as well as our cellular network reckon that between £6 billion and £24 billion was conspiratorially laundered via match fixing in EPL last season.”  SOURCE

Some journalists have even claimed that this is a vindication of British journalism, a fine example of how skilful undercover sleuthing can get to the heart of the matter and reveal the inherent charade for what it is.

However,  RM would have to disagree with that on the simple basis that British mainstream ‘journalism’ is wholly controlled by its owners, establishment figures like the creepy Rupert Murdoch, whose editors keep a firm grip on what does and doesn’t get published.  Political tones are largely superficial, the Guardian is as full of spurious information and conventional opinion as the Telegraph, the Mirror as full of gossip as the Mail, etc etc.

No. The mainstream press is dead in the water. A dead duck, a pathetic version of what once may have existed but now is no more. Namely, investigative journalism.

RM is not one to blow his own trumpet and would hardly describe himself as a journalist. Nevertheless, the contents of this site do serve as first hand testimony to his experiences and insights. The research of others outside the mainstream provides the depth that is so blatantly lacking in the press and other mainstream media (MSM).

Perhaps the last truly investigative TV programme was the BBC’s ‘Rough Justice’ – a series that delved into the ever-fruitful world of Her Majesty’s Courts to uncover a plethora of miscarriages of justice. It so piqued the establishment that the Attorney General erroneously attacked its methods and the stalwart of the justice system, Lord Denning, even went so far as to state it was deplorable that the British justice system was being portrayed in such a light when it was crucial that the commonly held view of it as the best in the world was maintained at all costs, even to the detriment of those who had suffered gross injustices at its hands.

Such a view is utterly deplorable as it amounts to nothing less than an establishment cover up.

The investigative journalists who worked on the programme were eventually hounded out as a result of pressure from the government and the judiciary and it went into decline before disappearing from tv screens in 2007.

Thus, whilst it is okay to expose the dubious workings of the rigged world of the football industry in Britain and elsewhere, it is less acceptable to the controllers to use the same techniques to expose the nefarious activities of the elite – whether it be a chancellor snorting cocaine, a Labour mp engaging in activity with rent boys, systemic corruption amongst politicians and their expenses, the selling of arms to Arab countries, the genocide of benefit cuts, the murky dealings of the Royal Family, money laundering by HSBC or the effects of zionism and/or usury on the peoples of the world – so those investigations invariably do not begin or get covered up to be spun out like the Chilcot Report into years of fake scrutiny by the very members of the same establishment that is under investigation.

So, the Telegraph journalists use their investigative powers to delve into the murky world of the industry known as football but why do they not put said powers to a more pressing issue, like the fraudulent operations of the money changers?  And yet, there are some among them who are wakening to the truth :

“ All these guys care about is money. They don’t care about society. They certainly don’t care about jobs and they don’t care about you.

OK, you might say, but this has always been going on. But it hasn’t. This sort of utterly amoral screw-everyone capitalism has become much more prevalent in the last 15 years. Our financial elite is now totally out of control. They learned nothing from the crisis, except that the rest of us were stupid enough to give them a second chance. And, now, having plucked all the “low hanging fruit,” they’re destroying the middle classes for profit.

Our current problems have their roots in the early 80s. While much of what Reagan and Thatcher did was necessary, the trouble is that they set a deregulatory train in motion which, over the last couple of decades has dismantled so much of the legal framework that protected us from greedy scuzzballs.”  Alex Proud, The Telegraph

The Wells Fargo banking fraud is a massive story – one of fake accounts, fraudulent debts and paltry fines that go to the coffers of the Rothschild controlled Federal Reserve and not into the pockets of those whose names have been stolen and used for profiteering:

“Reality Check: How Does Nobody Go To Jail In Wells Fargo Case After over 1.2 Million People Were Defrauded? And Why No Matter What Other Crimes The Bank Committed, They Have Been Granted Immunity!” SOURCE

By way of illustration of the genocide and plunder that is eviction, let’s take a look at the Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML) own figures for ‘repossessions’ (evictions) for the UK from 2008 to the present. The following table shows that in those eight years there has been 262,000 evictions. Many of those homes will have been family homes.

REPOSSESSION FIGURES 2008-2016, Council of Mortgage Lenders.
REPOSSESSION FIGURES 2008-2016, Council of Mortgage Lenders.

If there’s an average of 4 people per household, that figure stands at around 1,048,000 men, women and children evicted from 2008 to 2016.

And on it goes – plunder and genocide by banking cartels and their puppets in government and the judiciary, all backed up by the order followers known as bailiffs and police, each of whom remains individually culpable for their part in #TheGreatBritishMortgageSwindle.

In every sense, this story is self-evidently a bigger and more important issue than the antics of those largely unintelligent greedy ring masters who play around in the Circus known as ‘professional football’.

orwell-football-quote

Conclusion: the print media is currently unfit for purpose. All it deals in is gossip and superficiality  – the age-old bread and circus game of distracting the masses from the more important issues. There are, by the CML’s own figures, some 11.2 million mortgaged properties in the UK, each of which has a void charge hanging over it. A void charge that has been falsely registered at the Land Registry.

As and when the middle classes wake up to the swindle, then said Land Registry will be deluged in a tsunami of applications for each of those void charges to be removed. The people will bite back, just as Bastiat says,

“It is impossible to introduce into society a greater change and a greater evil than this: the conversion of the law into an instrument of plunder.”

That is manifestly where we are at and the upcoming theatrical release of #TGBMS will go some way to redressing the balance.

We began with a quotation by a Frenchman, so let’s end with another (from a surprising source) which is as relevant now as it was 201 years ago:

”When a government is dependent upon bankers for money, they and not the leaders of the government control the situation, since the hand that gives is above the hand that takes… Money has no motherland; financiers are without patriotism and decency; their sole object is gain.”

– Napoleon Bonaparte, Emperor of France 1815.

In the meantime, this autumn will mark the release of a cinematic investigation into the genocide of eviction. To book a place at a screening near you, please visit this site, TGBMS.

http://youtu.be/vQuvM7n-BFE?a

Acknowledgements: Many thanks to Jan B and Rhys J for their kind donations. Any reader who appreciates the work of RM is invited to make a donation via the button in the right hand column of this site.  

 

8

WHO ARE THE REAL EXTREMISTS?

THOSE WHO FLOUT THE RULE OF LAW OR THOSE WHO INSIST ON IT BEING APPLIED?

The inherent extremism of the Land Registry, the Judiciary and the Conveyancing Solicitors.

Prior to the Second World War, it used to be the case that no eviction would have taken place across these lands without a County Court Jury deciding that, on the balance of evidence, the individual(s) tenant or mortgagor actually deserved to be on the receiving end of such an extreme course of action. Continue reading “WHO ARE THE REAL EXTREMISTS?” →

8

#TGBMS & 99 HOMES – A COMPARISON.

  • How do two films on mortgage fraud compare?
  • One had a budget of $8m, the other zero.
  • Which deals with the issue of FAKE DEBT?
  • One is a documentary, the other fictional, using scripts and professional actors.

The film, 99 Homes is

Set amidst the backdrop of the 2008 housing market catastrophe, Dennis Nash, a hard-working and honest man, can’t save his family home despite his best efforts. Thrown to the streets with alarming precision by real estate shark Mike Carver, Dennis, out of work and luck, is given a unique opportunity – to join Carver’s crew and put others through the harrowing ordeal done to him in order to earn back what’s his.”

Ramin Bahrani's film about eviction is a damning indictment of personal greed but does it uncover the key aspects of the mortgage swindle?
Ramin Bahrani’s film about eviction is a damning indictment of personal greed but does it uncover the key aspects of the mortgage swindle?

Continue reading “#TGBMS & 99 HOMES – A COMPARISON.” →

0

Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Baskerville 2 by Anders Noren.

Up ↑