Far From the Madding Covid1984 Crowd?
On Friday last, two old friends and I were on a 10 ½ mile ramble in Derbyshire. When out in the countryside, it is customary to say hello to those who pass by on their way. After an hour or so, we were happily walking along the broad track alongside Derwent Reservoir when we noticed that a man and woman, both around 60 years old, had stepped off the trail on the right side. They were clearly afraid of something.
As we passed them, the man muttered something about how we should be walking in single file. I asked him what he was on about.
“Social distancing! Single file!” was his reply (whatever that is supposed to mean). He was clearly annoyed about something, undoubtedly caused by whatever was making him afraid. Little did we realise what it was.
“Why are you so angry?” I asked him.
“Two metres – you need to keep two metres away!”
“It’s common sense. You tossers!”
Yes. That is correct. He called us tossers, once he had ‘safely’ passed us.
“No. It’s not common sense at all,” I replied and we continued on our way.
I cite this as an example of the brainwashing that the population has been subjected to by its lying corporate government It was immediately clear to me that his anger was fear-based, with no grounding whatsoever in the facts of the matter.
This extraordinary and ridiculous event is clear evidence of the efficacy that the Covid1984 psyop has had on the majority of the population. This man has bought the lies, hook line and sinker. He is literally a conspiracy theorist who falsely believes there is a dreadful lurgy out there that can jump from person-to-person, even in the open countryside. The psyop has driven many close to insanity – just as it is intended to and the announcement of the next unlawful lockdown will result in more and more people being pushed over the edge of reality as they attempt to find some kind of consistency in the tissue of lies, illogicality and murderous tyranny that spews from the mealy-mouthed politicians and their phoney ‘advisors’.
In any event, we continued on our way, up to and along Derwent Edge, with everyone else we met being greeted in the usual manner of people passing each other on a country walk.
Upon my return, I became aware of the fact that a Freedom of Information (FOI) request had revealed the Covid1984 psyop to be completely naked: the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC), which is Matt Hancock’s department, had admitted that it holds no information that proves the existence of a virus known as Covid1984.
Here is the original FOI request dated 25th July, 2020:
“Please provide a full, accurate and complete list of records held within your office, and or under your authority, describing the isolation of a SARS-COV-2 virus, directly taken from a symptomatic patient of COVID-19 where the sample was not first combined with any other source of genetic material (not limited but by way of example monkey kidney cells, aka vero cells, liver cancer cells) thereby eliminating contamination as a possible alternative source of sampling.
Please note isolation is used in the normally understood meaning of the word – the act of separating a thing from another. I am not referring, and hence not requesting, to isolation meaning the culture of something else, the performance of an amplification test (eg PCR test which only detect mRNA or DNA) or the sequencing of “something”.
If any records match the above description and are available to the public elsewhere, please provide enough information so that I may identify and access each record with certainty (i.e. title, author(s), date, journal, and weblink or location where the public may access it). I remind you full, accurate and complete disclosure is required.”
Here is the stark reply that proves the Emperor is naked:
Your request has been handled under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). DHSC does not hold information on the isolation of a SARS-COV-2 virus.”
This response was followed up by a request on 25th August, 2020 which asked for further clarity to the question of just what evidence the DHSC is relying upon as we move into the next criminal lockdown over Covid1984. Thus, it gave them a further chance to provide any material evidence they hold that demonstrates the factual existence of the virus:
Based upon your previous responses to my FOI: …it has long been known that viral diseases cannot be identified in this way as viruses cannot be grown in ‘pure culture’. When a patient is tested for a viral illness, this is normally done by looking for the presence of antigens, or viral genetic code in a host with molecular biology techniques
Accordingly, please provide a full, accurate and complete list of records held within your office, and / or under your authority, supporting the following claims;
1 – Which symptoms uniquely identify COVID-19?
2 – Which viral antigens uniquely identify COVID-19?
3 – Which viral genetic code uniquely identifies SARS-Cov-2?
4 – What is the accuracy of the testing method for unique COVID-19 antigens upon which those governing rely upon, with supporting scientific verification?
5 – What is the accuracy of the testing method for unique SARS-Cov-2 genetic code upon which those governing rely upon, with supporting scientific verification?
6 – https://www.gov.uk/guidance/high-consequ…
shows updates detailing the explanation of the removal of COVID-19 from the HCID list was on the version dated 21 March 2019. However, there is no link to the source document.
Please provide source document from the 4 nations public health HCID group… that supported the decision that as of 19 March 2020, COVID-19 is no longer considered to be a high consequence infectious disease (HCID) in the UK.”
The answer was late – a reply was due on 14 September, 2020. When it did come, on 28 October, 2020, it simply re-confirmed that the DHSC, under Matt Hancock, Health Minister, has admitted that it has no material evidence to prove the existence of Covid-19:
Conclusion
After careful consideration of the subject matter, I have concluded that the response you received was compliant with the requirements of the FOIA and I uphold DHSC’s statement that the Department does not hold the requested information.”
Charlene Carter
Casework Manager
Freedom of Information Team
FreedomofInformation@dhsc.gov.uk
Could the fraud get any plainer? And the people are supposed to accept the lockdown without the Department of Health and Social Care having any proof that there is a virus?
When the criminal legislation is founded on fraud, it is immediately null and void, under Common Law.
This is why the 650 members of Parliament who have spinelessly acquiesced to the groundless diktats of Covid1984 are facing Private Criminal Prosecution under Common Law.
At this point, it becomes our moral duty to disobey the tyranny.
You cannot avoid it, try as you might for anything less is to be complicit in the fraud.
Drop the fear and refuse to comply:
_______________________________________________
As ever, a huge thank you for the kindness of David R.
Should anyone kindly wish to leave a donation, then please use the paypal link.
Alternatively, you may choose to send tip me some Bitcoin at this address: 1HqUX2C66HbvJddoAwUVdz8yqucWEpJN3L