Category: Rogue Podcast

Mind Bending Intelligence Gathering

A Discourse That Begins With The Intelligence Of Dr Jekyll, Covers The 125 Year Sci-Fi-Psy-Op and Applies The Trivium To The Notion Of Space Travel as Perpetuated by NASA and Mr Musk’s Space X.

In some, if not all, respects, we are players in a great game of Hide and Seek. Last Spring, I released a Rogue Cast in which I posited the view that, whatever this realm may be, we are each of us involved in a game of hiding and finding. Each of us has things we wish to hide, or to keep secret from others. Each of us has a curiosity that sends us seeking answers to questions that have occurred to us.

This simple tenet applies to all things.

‘Seek and Ye Shall Find.’

In The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde, published in 1886, by Robert Louis Stevenson, the narrator states,

“If he be Mr. Hyde” he had thought, “I shall be Mr. Seek.”

Stevenson puts forward the view that each of us exists with the capacity for good and evil,

“With every day, and from both sides of my intelligence, the moral and the intellectual, I thus drew steadily nearer to the truth, by whose partial discovery I have been doomed to such a dreadful shipwreck: that man is not truly one, but truly two.”

Stevenson writes of a duality of nature that is to be found in each of us,

“All human beings, as we meet them, are commingled out of good and evil: and Edward Hyde, alone, in the ranks of mankind, was pure evil” ?

What does our intelligence make of this?

Firstly, let’s consider just what intelligence means,

intelligence(n.)

late 14c., “the highest faculty of the mind*, capacity for comprehending general truths;” c. 1400,

“faculty of understanding, comprehension,” from Old French intelligence (12c.) and directly from Latin intelligentia, intellegentia “understanding, knowledge, power of discerning; art, skill, taste,”

from intelligentem (nominative intelligens) “discerning, appreciative,” present participle of intelligere “to understand, comprehend, come to know.”

This is from assimilated form of inter “between” (see inter-) + legere “choose, pick out, read,” from PIE root *leg- (1) “to collect, gather,” with derivatives meaning “to speak (to ‘pick out words’).”

* mind, as I have previously articulated, is non-local.

Given the non-locality of the mind, then intelligence may be defined as the ability to discern truths from the information (Grammar) received by the brain from the Informed Field.

Intelligence is the ‘capacity’ to comprehend ‘general truths’.

 

The character of Dr Jekyll is personified thus,

“from both sides of my intelligence, the moral and the intellectual, I thus drew steadily nearer to the truth.”

Stevenson is evidently suggesting that intelligence is dualistic – i.e it is only founded in the morality and the intellectual capacity of the individual.

Whilst I acknowledge this is but a work of fiction and that for the purposes of the narrative of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde, this is necessary, I do wonder if this precludes the other possibilities of intelligence being intuitive. After all, how often do we find that our first impressions of an individual or a subject turn out to be accurate?

At this point, it may be necessary to remind the reader that I am of the view that what we take to be our thoughts do not emanate from the brain but, rather exist outside us and that our brain is simply download the information.

The conscious individual comes to know that nothing comes from his brain, but that the brain receives his ideas and imaginings from the Informed Field, and that his connection to that is improved by his being conscious of himself as a spirit, sojourneying through this realm inside a bio-avatar that may not even be his.

Stevenson suggests that Jekyll is limited by his individual intelligence and that this may be applied to each and everyone of us;

“All human beings, as we meet them, are commingled out of good and evil: and Edward Hyde, alone, in the ranks of mankind, was pure evil.”

And yet, Stevenson also wrote in Lay Morals that,

“So long as we love we serve; so long as we are loved by others, I would almost say that we are indispensable; and no man is useless while he has a friend.”

And, in Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde, he shows himself to be well-aware of man’s true nature and his existence in this realm, a construct that is most likely a simulacrum, a copy of another realm,

“I began to perceive more deeply than it has ever yet been stated, the trembling immateriality, the mist-like transience, of this seemingly so solid body in which we walk attired.”

It is also to be noted that Stevenson was unhealthy, much of his life being plagued by an illness that, eventually, resulted in him moving to the South Pacific (Samoa) to alleviate its symptoms. Bouts of ill-health are certainly conducive to a more lucid view of individual existence as a beguiling and convincing dream in which we believe ourselves to be awake.
Largely bedridden, Stevenson described himself as living

“like a weevil in a biscuit.”

Our intelligence is necessarily limited until we apply our common sense to an issue.

Remember, in a mental construct or perceived reality, it is essential that we develop and apply our critical thinking skills to any given matter. If we are confined by an intelligence that only perceives a dichotomy, then we will become just that – an individual who is hampered by the limitations of his intelligence.

All of which is why the Trivium is such a powerful tool for it is one which utilises the individual’s natural proclivity towards elucidating the truth of a matter.

By way of example, let us apply it to consider Elon Musk’s promotion of his Space X narrative and his notion that we can travel through space and colonise Mars within 20-30 years.

  1. Grammar: the who, what, when and where of the matter.

In order to truly believe in Space existing as a reality, it is necessary to examine the information:

Who has put forward the view that space travel is a possibility?

H. G. Wells – the War of the Worlds, the Time Machine; myriad Sci-Films and books of the last 100 years+.

Spielberg, Stanley Kubrick, Gene Roddenberry (Star Trek), George Lucas (Star Wars), the BBC (Dr Who), any and all Sci-Films and, of course, NASA.

The astronauts – each of whom is a freemason – are also presented to the public as proof space travel is possible.

When did the promotion of Sci-Fi begin?

Over 100 years ago, with H.G. Wells figuring large in its infancy. Since then, it has been rolled out via mass printing of newspapers and books but, arguably more significantly, it has been seeded in the imaginations of the populace by films and TV programmes that portray the fantasy and trick the viewer into accepting it all as possible. The sheer number of Sci-Fi films is taken as evidence of this being a mass thought control programme.

What are they each promoting?

The notion that the stars and planets are real and that we are on a globe (a ball) spinning through the galaxy at great speed.

What do they cite as proof of space travel?

The Cosmonauts of the Soviet Union’s voyages in space with Yuri Gagarin, huge volumes of ‘photographs’, videos of ‘astronauts’ in zero ‘gravity’, footage of space rockets and their purported landings.

To where do the believers claim man has travelled in Space?

The Apollo Moon Landing of 1969 and each of the subsequent ‘missions’ are invariably cited as proof that mankind has landed on the moon. However, a cursory look at the cited ‘proof’ reveals it to be nothing more than cinematic psy-op filmed, most probably, by Stanley Kubrick. The Newsbenders, a BBC film from 1968, reveals such a film set, a year before the ‘landing’ on the lunar surface.

Just one year before the Apollo ‘moonlanding’ of 1969, the BBC’s Newsbenders showed this lunar space set.

In 2025, we have the continuance of the same fake narrative in the form of Elon Musk’s Space X agency and his claim that mankind will be able to colonise Mars in 20-30 years.
We are also fed the fantasy of The International Space Station, nonsensical footage of Astro-Women with their hair on end to simulate ‘zero gravity’.

NASA publishes only composite images of the ‘globe’, CGIs of the world in which the clouds never shift, dubious photographs of the stars and the planets.

Computer/CGI composite ‘photos’ of the earth from ‘Space’.

How can the Critical Thinker ignore these anomalies (which are but the tip of the fraudulent and monolithic iceberg)?

By way of an adjunct, in July, 1969, I was 4 1/2 years old. It was an exceptionally sunny day and, with the lounge facing south, the curtains were drawn so that I could see the screen. I remember watching the purported moon landing as it was shown on our black and white TV. Whether or not I was viewing the highlights, I cannot recall. However, I was most definitely unimpressed by it, to the point where I decided it was not worthy of my attention any longer. After all, I would rather be playing outside, so I drew back the curtains, turned off the set and stepped out into the beauty of the day.

Such was my childish take on the Space nonsense. It may not surprise the reader but thereafter, I never had any real or lasting interest in the subject. We went to see the Star Wars film on its release in 1978 but I didn’t bother with any of the subsequent episodes.

2. Logic (reasoning)

How has the Sci-Fi Psy-op been promulgated? By the Dark Cinematic Arts of Film and TV, a programming of a false narrative that begins in the child and bombards him throughout his life.

Why? To keep Mankind distracted and thus ignorant of his true self and the nature of the world in which he appears to live. To sever the divine connection of each spirit to his ultimate creator. To disable and nullify the individual threat to the Freemasonic sorcerers and controllers that would arise were the individual able to break free of the mental shackles that tie him to the dungeon programming (Jason Breshears).

3. Rhetoric.

By way of the falsified Space Narrative, by the seeding and promulgation of the false notion that life is meaningless as we are but carbon based lifeforms spinning on a ball through a galaxy and the relentless propaganda attached to it all, the controllers or mind benders are able to place individual minds into virtual prisons where the walls that contain his mind are invisible.

The Space Narrative has served its scriptwriters and their controllers by effectively placing an imaginary astronaut’s helmet on the head(s) of the deceived. Not only is it a kind of goldfish bowl for his mind but it also works as a shaken snow dome, the particles of which further confuse and obscure his already limited perception of himself and his existence.

Conclusion: in a perceived reality, all is mind. Thus, those who seek to control the profane, the goyim and the infidel, the epithets that the masses are labelled with, use the Space Narrative as an effective means of mind control. Another significant benefit for the would-be controllers is the huge financial opportunities that also accrue via the funnelling of taxes and moneys into NASA and Space X.

__________________________________________________________

Thank you for your kind attention.

Should you be able to support me, please consider chucking a few quid into the pot via the BuyMeACoffee button and/or taking out a paid subscription at my Substack page.

4

Is Elon Musk a Nice Man?

… is a Nice Man.

Nice is an incorrectly and much over-used word, at least as far as the English language is concerned.

I have been writing essays for close on 50 years, a discipline that was instilled into me throughout my state-education. From O-level, to A-level to a Degree in English Language and Literature, I became accustomed to being able to pump out 1,000 – 3,000 word essays at a fair rate by my late teens.

For me, the necessary discipline required for writing essays came naturally. Often, I would read back and ponder where the writing had actually come. Frequently, I was impressed by the quality of my writings, not in an egotistical sense but in a genuine sense that I would wonder where the inspiration and the actual content had come from. Invariably, I was left with the vague impression that it had come from a higher source, that I was tapping into some kind of information field and then I would conclude that what was written by the pen to manifest on the paper was some kind of ability that existed within me. In any event, it is fair to state that the act of writing has come easy to me but is it really to be attributed to that fictional entity known as ‘myself’?

I now no longer take the view that it was and is a local ability that resides in my brain.

In my previous RogueCast of last week, I delved into the non-locality of the imagination, how our dream-scapes are evidence of the spirit leaving the body during sleep, how this demonstrates that we are not the bio-meat-suits in which we travel through this realm and that our ideas and knowledge are direct reflections of our ability to tap into the information field that exists all around us.

In today’s episode of the Rogue Cast, I focus on the usage and correct meaning of the too-often spoken word, nice:

ORIGIN
Middle English (in the sense ‘stupid’): from Old French, from Latin nescius ‘ignorant’, from nescire ‘not know’.

nice(adj.)

late 13c., “foolish, ignorant, frivolous, senseless,” from Old French nice (12c.)

“careless, clumsy; weak; poor, needy; simple, stupid, silly, foolish,” from Latin nescius “ignorant, unaware,” literally “not-knowing,” from ne- “not” (from PIE root *ne- “not”) + stem of scire “to know” (see science).

As I uncovered the etymology of nice, I came across another word whose meaning is equally far-removed from its original and true sense:

fond (adj.)

late 14c., “deranged, insane;” also “foolish, silly, unwise,” from fonned, past-participle adjective from obsolete verb fon, fonne (Middle English fonnen) “be foolish, be simple,” from Middle English fonne “a fool, stupid person” (early 14c.), which is of uncertain origin but perhaps from Scandinavian. Related: Fonder; fondest.

We can see that the original meaning of nice derives from the Latin, nescius – meaning ignorant:

Those who carry out the business of the bankers are handsomely rewarded for their sweat equity ~ economists, propagandists, advertisers, film makers, psychiatrists, drug manufacturers (whether legal or otherwise, it matters not, if they are all using the money).

The thing is that in order to keep the people tricked and playing the game, the Bankers require that the people remain nescient (unaware) of what is going on. To break free of their mind games, one has to understand just what those games are and how they work on the human mind. From ‘Rescinding the Birth Certificate’

A current example of the correct use of the word nescient would be to state,

“Without a nescient population, which had been deliberately miseducated and propagandised, the genocide by needlepoint global operation would have failed.” Genocide by Needlepoint

Notes

  1. Thank you and much appreciation to each and every one of you who kindly tipped me a few quid via the BuyMeACoffee page.
  2. How over-used and inaccurately applied is the word nice.
  3. The Trivium is the Three Ways of how we discern the Truth – Grammar, Logic and Rhetoric.
  4. In a perceived reality we are compelled to the Truth that it is, therefore, a mental construct.
  5. The brain is not the source of your imagination, your ideas, visions, realisations – it all comes from without you; the brain being but a receiver and an antenna of information. Information that is in the informed field that you appear to live in (although you may actually be dreaming yourself to be awake).
  6. In Times such as these, speaking the truth becomes an individual act of liberation.
  7. How I became an essayist.
  8. In a perceived reality logic and reason are essential tools in the individual’s armoury. The Trivium is the tool he can use to reach a more accurate and complete understanding of any subject.
  9. The simulacrum we are in is, by definition, a copy of another realm.
  10. A pertinent question in the butcher’s shop, comedy as release of unspoken subjects and thoughts, often in form of taboos.
  11. The role of the Licenced Jester or Fool – why the comic has always been tolerated. A good comedian is simply tapping into the informed field to pull out the taboos that others may feel they cannot express.
  12. The Fake Space Narrative and Elon Musk’s promotion of it and its furtherance.
  13. His promotion of the fake space narrative and rockets to Mars leads us to the pertinent question of what his aim may be:

    Elon Musk promotes the false narrative of Space Travel even going as far to suggest Mars can be colonised in 30 years.
  14. Does he know that NASA and the Sci-Fi narratives of space travel are BS?

    In the event Musk is serious and truly believes his own rhetoric, then he has fallen for the 100 year+ Sci Fi Psy-op.
  15. If so, he’s fantastic actor who is simply continuing the furtherance of the baloney, for and on behalf of his Freemasonic Financial Overlords.
  16. In the event he believes in it all, then he is a dupe, a fool or, to use the term correctly, a nice man.
  17. So, given the word nice means ignorant or foolish,

is Elon Musk a nice man?

Conclusion.

The Power of Language is not to be underestimated. Use the words correctly, be precise in your expression of the Truth and avoid the use of the word nice unless you choose to use it correctly.

Indeed, your Critical Thinking abilities and intution are what will enable you to discern Fact from Fiction.

Thank you for listening.

Should you be able to support me during this time of my debanking, please consider chucking a few quid into the pot via the BuyMeACoffee button and/or taking out a paid subscription at my Substack page.

1

Education: A Discourse on its True Meaning

In this RogueCast, I consider How Education Has Been Inverted.

The word ‘Education’ is from the Latin, Educare, the definition of which is,

ORIGIN
late Middle English: from Latin educat- ‘led out’, from the verb educare, related to educere ‘lead out’ (see educe).

  • Notes
  1. How the Truth has become an Inversion.
  2. Appointment of Sir Hamid Patel as Chairman of OFSTED – Star Academies
  3. Divide and Rule – Mohammedism is a Trojan Horse designed to perpetuate it.
  4. Inversion of public servant – master roles when it comes to those in government
  5. Lindsey Hoyle has grown fat on the public purse.
  6. The best way to control the opposition is to lead it.
  7. Reform party. Nigel Farage is an ex banker.
  8. Chair of Reform Party is Zia Usuf – another Mohammedan
  9. The placement of former bankers in geopolitical roles – Mark Carney, former Governor of BoE, now unelected PM of Canada
  10. Quote from Phenomenal World, p 46

  11. “Consciousness is not located in the brain, but is a ‘plasmic holographic energy field’ that permeates and surrounds the physical body. Is this hologram built of thought waves or thought particles? In a holographic universe the concept of location is an illusion, everything being nonlocal, including consciousness. Although consciousness seems to be localised somewhere inside the skull, it can at times appear to be localised elsewhere, as in the case of out-of-body experiences. The nonlocal aspect of consciousness is also suggested by dreams, where location and space are completely illusory and shifting.”

  12. We are not our biological meat suits, our avatars, these vehicles in which we travel through this construct.
  13. Archaix on X (Twitter)
  14. You become that which you suppose yourself to be –

  15. “I am that, I am.”

  16. The most powerful among us are the autodidacts, the free thinkers who have removed the mind shackles of their miseducation and the propaganda that they are immersed in.
  17. Substack is but another limited hangout
  18. The Limited Hangouts – the actors and gobshites who dominate them
  19. Freedom of speech but not freedom of reach – Yaccarino, CEO, X.

  20. How paying for X’s blue tick is like a man who is already in a straitjacket paying to be put in a muffled and silent padded cell (above)
  21. Musk as DOGE, the Sheriff of Venice
  23. The entire episode is, essentially, focused on the subject of Education and it is only by bringing out his spirit from within that the individual will free himself of the shackles of his perceived reality.

Thank you for listening.

Should you be able to support me during this time of my debanking, please consider chucking a few quid into the pot via the BuyMeACoffee button and/or taking out a paid subscription at my Substack page.

7

They Shoot Footballers, Don’t They? How Football is Crocked.

In this Discourse, the Rogue Male Considers How Association Football Shot itself in both feet and how Staged Events Like Football Are to Be Expected in a Theatrical World.

Has Association Football Moronically Assigned its Thoroughbreds to the Knacker’s Yard?

 

Notes

  1. Welcome and a heartfelt thank you all those who have kindly left a donation or taken out a paid subscription to my Substack page.
  2. Whilst we are able to hear and see what is around us, that does not prove we are in a natural world, in which events unfold randomly. The opposite is the case – everything in this construct occurs on a timeline, with events echoing other events with a mathematical and a calendric patterning that can be measured, as demonstrated by the incredible work of Jason Breshears of archaix.com
  3. The Freemasonic Sorcerers who write the scripts for False Flag events can easily predict the responses of the masses. However, they can never predict how the individual rogue being will act.
  4. The Skripal False Flag event – Salisbury, Porton Down connections of Chris Whitty who was also prominent in the Divoc 91 Scamdemic Psy-op as conducted between 2020 and 2022.
  5. Taking the MIC (Military Industrial Complex) – UK ‘Gov’ has been criminally permitting the spraying of the people with all kinds of poisons for at least 70 years now.
  6. Kicker Conspiracy – the freemasonic origins of Association Football – marked contrast to its original form. It’s all about rules and regulations, occultic ritual, psychological manipulation and energy harvesting, in all its forms.
  7. Energy harvesting via stirring up of opposing football crowd energies, magnetic polarities, cash-credit extraction via merchandising all offered up to the false god of Freemasonry, Jah-Bal-On.
  8. It is all psychological manipulation, distraction and football is but another version of bread and circuses – all to the benefit of the controllers, the freemasonic sorcerers and script writers, or the predictive programmers of this perceived reality.
  9. The hypnotic effect of TV and the induced suggestive state wherein the individual is open to receiving any and all propaganda, having no ability to think critically, he is easily influenced
  10. They shoot footballers, don’t they?
  11. I also have a strange encounter with a man who falsely believes filming in public places, in this case the woods, cannot take place without his permission.
  12. Shakespeare’s analogy is correct – we are players/actors acting our roles on a series of stages. Football is no different.
  13. As is always the case, the question is, who is writing the scripts and directing the action?

Thank you for listening.

Should you be able to support me during this time of my debanking, please consider chucking a few quid into the pot via the BuyMeACoffee button and/or taking out a paid subscription at my Substack page.

7

A Winter of Discontent

In which the Rogue Male discourses on this Winter of Discontent, State Plunder, the Inevitability of the Swing to the Reich (sic) and how the Dissenting Individual is More Powerful than He Realises. The discourse continues with a discussion of how his good friend Dave’s Claim of Mortgage Fraud against a UK Lender was Railroaded by a masonic Judge and a Mr Laville, barrister of the Inner Temple, which is a Further Example of the Two Tier Justice System that is Rigged in Favour of the Criminal Financiers.

Topics covered in this discourse over a Winter of Discontent:

  1. State Plunder
  2. Back on the Farm – episode 71
  3. Swing of the pendulum
  4. Trump playing role of the Jesuit ‘saviour’ and Musk his Freemasonic sidekick
  5. Controlling the script – eg no more trans-gender nonsense
  6. All taxation is theft – similar reveal going on Isles of Britain – Albanian prison electric cards
    African promotion of trans-gender nonsense.
  7. Billions of pounds of stolen moneys/energies transferred to foreign states in furtherance of bogus agendas.
  8. How the British peoples have had enough – exemplified by treatment of immigrants from theft of energies
  9. US Congress woman Elizabeth Warren’s massive increase in her assets
  10. The funnelling of energies money and plunder into pockets of geo-political puppets.
  11. How Council tax is on increase and the rise in people stopping paying it.
  12. No taxation without representation
  13. DOGE audits continuing to reveal the theft plunder and misappropriation of credits
  14. How charity begins at home
  15. How the plunder is directly from native peoples of US and Europe
  16. How the Trans-Atlantic actions will similarly occur in Northern Europe
  17. The Mortgage Monkey – revealed demonstrable fraud of any and all mortgages
  18. Bait and switch – how the mortgage racket is built on fraud.
  19. How the Promise to pay is what creates the credit, which is also true of bank notes
  20. Dave’s situation – how the UK Courts are operating a 2 tier justice system in favour of the credit controllers.
  21. How the Court issued a Void possession order and the decision for Dave to go in as the Claimant
  22. N1 Application for a Declaration that the possession order was founded on an illegal deed of mortgage:
  23. Sir Ross Cranston, former solicitor General in Blair’s government
  24. How mortgage strikes would have a Deleterious effect on the financiers’ profiteering
  25. The Mortgage industry is a multi billion pound racket
  26. The Monetary mechanics of any and all loans
  27. How on 12th February, 2025, the Judge determined Dave’s claim was an abuse of process when, in fact, it the financiers and courts that are abusing the process of credit creation
  28. Mortgage strikes – people refusing, individually and en masse to pay
  29. Bring courts to a standstill and deny fake lenders their income streams
  30. USAID – United States Agency International Development
  31. The demiurge – to whom Musk and Trump have sworn allegiance
  32. The Time is ripe to take advantage of the unveiling – the one ring to control it all is the credit system
  33. Taking advantage of the pendulum’s swing – courts manifestly not going to support the people, so it behoves them to take action individually.
  34. The misrepresentations of the solicitor and barrister representing the Nationwide ‘lender.’
  35. How the Antidote to state sponsored fraud and collectivist mind control lies entirely within the individual
  36. The Conclusion: when the individual takes action, things happen for the best, one door closes, another opens. This winter of discontent will eventually end.

Thank you for listening to this discourse. As ever, I am very grateful to those who have chucked a few quid into the coffers by way of the  Buy Me a Coffee button and/or have taken out a subscription to my Substack pages where, if you like, you can also support me by taking out a paid subscription which will grant you ‘first dibs’ on my output.

 

1

Back On The Farm

A conversation with Dominic and Christian of the Sheep Farm Podcast.

After a hiatus, I’m back with a rather different episode of the Rogue Cast. This week’s offering was recorded on 24th January, 2025 and is a conversation with Dominic and Christian on their Sheep Farm Podcast.

All 3 of us are former pupils of the same High School and I last spoke with them in the Summer of 2024. This conversation was another enjoyable ramble across a variety of subjects pertaining to this crazy realm we find ourselves in.

Topics discussed include the staged geopolitical realm, its various actors, the News Benders film of 1968, the recent Fog, tobacco smoking, mind manipulation, the second summer of love, the lawfare waged upon Richard D Hall, the Law, Do Unto Others As You Would Have Them Do Unto You, a parasitic legal system, sovereignty, money and credit, empathy, male female polarities, the effects of testosterone replacement therapy, (ste)roid rage, genetic manipulation, how the societal pendulum will inevitably swing from left to right and the resultant changes, acadummy gatekeeping and hidden history.

Hope you enjoy it as much as I did. Thanks to Dom and Christian for having me on the show and, a big thank you to all those who have supported the work on this site. Please consider buying me a coffee should you be feeling appreciative.

RogueCast 071: Back On The Farm (Download – Right Click to Save Link As)

 

4

The Mortgage Monkey

The Great British Mortgage Swindle in Real Time.

This Rogue Cast (070) is a condensed exposition of the various components that comprise the multi-levelled racketeering operation which is revealed in the Great British Mortgage Swindle (TGBMS) the eviscerating documentary that was released in late 2018.

Whilst I have written extensively about TGBMS, this episode stands as a real-time expose of how the entire racket is predicated on the ignorance and common practice of the conveyancing solicitor.

The viewer is encouraged to read this essay on how, in 2015, I sued the conveyancing solicitor who advised me that the mortgage agreement I entered in 1994 was Lawful, along with this Rogue Cast, ‘the Knight Who Shut Down My Negligence Claim.’

Both illustrate exactly how and why the courts of the British Isles are engaged in covering up the swindle to the point of rolling out a Knight of the Realm to assist them in their manifest support of what is an industrial-scale racket.

For those who haven’t’ watched TGBMS, it can be viewed here for free.

The podcast stands as an exposition of how a current application for a loan to buy a house (secured by a mortgage) is unfolding and is laid out in in a step-by-step account of the role that is played by the conveyancing solicitor.

Regular readers will not be surprised by the various deceptions that take place during the process of the application and what is laid out is the demonstrable professional negligence of the solicitor who is, in effect, wholly reliant upon the common practice of those who specialise in these matters. The appeal to common practice is, of course, a logical fallacy on the simple basis that just because a practice is done commonly, that does not necessarily make it Lawful.

The entirety of the racket is predicated on the false notion that a loan is made. This essay explains exactly how and why it is false.

It is to be noted that all of this applies to each and every mortgage application, whether in the Isles of Britain or elsewhere in the world.

The swindle is wholly dependent upon the ignorance of the duped individual who, in reality, is the one who funds the purchase of the property in its entirety.

As stated previously, the licenced brokers (the ‘banks’) are in the business of wheeling and dealing in securities – they do not make loans but only extend credit and in this industrial scale fraud, the creditor (the mortgagor) is the one who provides the funding by way of his signature on a deed to a property he does not own at the time he signs the incomplete deed (it is not dated).

This is in contradiction of s1 of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1989.
The agreement for a loan for the disposition of an interest in land (which includes mortgages) is, as a matter of fact, illegal in every case as it is not in writing and is never counter-signed by a duly appointed officer of the fake lender, which is a breach of s2 of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1989 (the LPMP Act  1989).

The issue of a valid contract can be read in this essay,  TGBMS – No Contract?

In this current situation, which is developing right now in Nottingham, we can see how, like a conjuring trick, the deception is dependent upon the ignorance of both the ‘punter’ and his legal advisor.

Naturally, it is largely dependent also upon the false notion that a loan has been made from the fake lenders’ coffers when, in accord with the monetary mechanics of modern finance, the credit is created by deposit of the fake mortgage deed in an account from which it is streamed.

Agreement means contract and in this essay, I explain exactly how a valid contract requires the agreed terms, conditions and performance of both parties. At most, the lender should be paid an administrative fee only.

In this situation, at the behest of the conveyancing solicitor and because there is no performance (loan) made by the bank, then it is what is known as a nudum pactum, literally, a naked agreement.

As an interesting aside, the question may be reasonably asked, how is it that virtually no one who leaves the public fooling system understands what actually constitutes a valid contract?

 

 

 

 

A valid contract will contain the following elements:

  1. The agreement of the parties to perform in accordance with the terms and conditions – this can be oral, or in writing, as is required under s2. of the 1989 LPMP Act.
  2. Consideration by both parties (the duped individual is promising to pay via the credits he earns but the bank’s performance is an illusion – no loan is made).
  3. A written contract will contain the terms of the agreement and will be signed by the parties.
    In short: the fake lender is in breach of these stipulations. It is also worth noting that without full disclosure as to where the funds originate, then any agreement becomes null and void.

As the podcast shows, the former Nottingham Bank was located in the magnificent building on Thurland Street in Nottingham. Said building has two monkey statues fixed to the stone work: commonly recognised as a mortgage monkey.

The solicitor in each and every case is being paid for his professional knowledge and from this it naturally follows that he should know the Law of Mortgages.

However, he does not for he has been miseducated during the course of his years of study in the legal system, which is, in essence, a mirror of the Talmudic system which has formulated a series of complex ‘get out’ clauses to ‘permit’ any and all unlawful stratagems.

In 2014, the case of Scott vs Southern Pacific was ruled upon by the Supreme Court, with Justice Lady Hale issuing a (unheeded)  warning that there is no right to grant a charge unless you are the owner of the property –

Without exception, the conveyancing solicitor will instruct the client not to date the deed – in line with the bait and switch deception whereby the individual goes into the arrangement as the creditor and ends up as debtor.

All of which is predicated on the credit system which controlled by the financiers to their advantage and to the detriment of everyone else.

The 1989 Act makes it plain that there has to be a contract signed by all parties.

The questions which arise from this current real time expose of the duplicity of the conveyancing solicitor are straightforward:

  1. Is it lawful for me to sign a mortgage deed over a property which I do not own?
  2. Where is the contract as per the Act?
  3. Can you confirm that the ‘Bank’ will be making a loan of moneys from its own coffers?

The Kuwait Bank vs Sahib case, which was between 2 banks, not between a mortgagor and a bank made it plain  as long ago as 1996 –

UNITED BANK OF KUWAIT V SAHIB & OTHERS
(1996) Times, 13 February
Deposit of deeds does not create charge

COURT OF APPEAL
Published 13 February, 1996

Before Lord Justice Leggatt, Lord Justice Peter Gibson and Lord Justice Phillips

Judgment February 2, 1996

Section 2 of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989, which provided that a disposition of an interest in land had to be in writing in a document signed by both parties incorporating all the terms of the agreement, abolished the long established rule that a mere deposit of title deeds relating to a property by way of security created a valid equitable mortgage or charge of the property without more.

The Court of Appeal so held in a reserved judgment dismissing the appeal of the third defendant, Societe Generale Alsacienne de Banque SA (“SoGenAl”), from part of the judgment of Mr Justice Chadwick (The Times July 7, 1994; (1995) 2 WLR 94) in the Chancery Division when he granted a declaration that, as between SoGenAl and the plaintiff bank, United Bank of Kuwait plc, SoGenAl did not hold any equitable mortgage or charge over the undivided share belonging to the first defendant, Hadi Haji Sahib (“S”), in the proceeds of sale of the property known as 37c Fitzjohn’s Avenue, Hampstead, London… continued here

All of which may add up to the refrain,

One rule for thee but another for me.

and the selective application of the Law of Mortgages.

It is hard to escape the fact that the solicitor is acting simultaneously for the bank as well as the individual punter – is this ever disclosed? No. The conflict of interest is another element of TGBMS.

Is there any aspect of the transaction which is lawful?  I would argue not in the least.

To reiterate this essential point, these are the most salient questions an indivdual can ask of his conveyancing solicitor,

  1. Is it lawful for me to sign a mortgage deed over a property that I am not the owner of?
    Where is the agreement for the loan?
  2. Can you confirm that there does not need to be a written contract, signed by both parties as per the LPMP Act 1989?
  3. Can you confirm that I will be receiving the loan from the bank’s own funds?

Common practice is what they will rely upon but that does not make it lawful.

How competent, therefore, are these conveyancing solicitors?

Both the separate documents that the husband and wife are being asked to sign – one for him promising to continue working into his 70s and one for her to relinquish her spousal share of the equity in the house are manifestly void and fall as fatal breaches  of the Consumer Rights Act – as soon as an individual is disadvantaged, that’s a breach of the act.

At Law, the statutory regulations listed here and elsewhere have to followed by the licenced lenders but they are not. Why? Because it is a criminal racket.

In short, the conveyancing solicitors know nothing about the Law, let alone the statutory regulations they are legally required to comply with.


The notion that the LPMP Act does not apply to individuals is fallacious
There is no mortgage contract containing the signatures of both the mortgagor and the mortgagee, along with the terms and conditions, in a single document.

This offends Section 2 of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989, in accordance with the Court of Appeal decision in United Bank of Kuwait v Sahib & Others [1996] –

a mortgage or charge will not arise without a section 2 compliant contract.

This is the dilemma posed in the Rogue Cast – being furnished with the facts of the matter, what would you do?

Thank you for listening and reading the accompanying essay. As ever, I am very grateful to those who have chucked a few quid into the coffers by way of the  Buy Me a Coffee button and/or take out a subscription to my Substack pages where, if you like, you can also support me by taking out a paid subscription which will grant you ‘first dibs’ on my output.

All the very best, Michael.

1

A Question of Law: The Triads of Britain

HOW & WHY MAGNA CARTA WAS FOUNDED ON ANCIENT BRITISH HISTORY & LAW.

It is reasonable to state that the Peoples of these islands [commonly known as the ‘British Isles, including Ireland’] have a long and noble history of common law.

Natural law may be seen as the innate understanding of what is fair or right (correct). The common law rises from it.  Natural law, being of the creator/nature/god, is superior to any man-made law (positive law) which may be used to place a state, corporation or any individual between a Man and his maker.

From the common law, there arises knowledge of certain key principles like the right to a fair hearing, freedom of expression, due process of the law and the power of a jury to nullify an unjust law or exonerate an individual who has been wrongfully accused. It includes the reasonable principle that a crime cannot have been committed without there being a victim, or injured party.

“Blind unquestioning obedience is the law of tyrants and of slaves: it does not yet flourish on English soil… Arrested with or without a warrant, the subject is entitled to know why he is deprived of his freedom, if only in order that he may, without a moment’s delay, take such steps as will enable him to regain it.” Christie v. Leachinsky [1947] A.C 573.

From: “Freedom under the Law” by Sir Alfred Denning, One of the Lords Justices of his Majesty’s Court of Appeal in England’ 1949 (Thirteenth Impression, 1986)

Common sense is the innate understanding that rises in a man when he is faced with an issue or situation that and it is founded in intuitive reason. Common law, in so far as it depends on the ability to reason, is common sense.

NATURAL LAW > COMMON

For an overview of the distinctions between natural and common law, here is an interesting read:

In Western culture, the philosophical conception of natural law first appears among ancient Greek thinkers. Although natural law is often conflated with common law, the two are distinct.

Common law is not based on inherent rights, but is the legal tradition whereby certain rights or values are legally recognized by virtue of already having judicial recognition or articulation.

Natural law is often contrasted with the human-made laws (positive law) of a given political community, society, or state.

In legal theory, the interpretation of a human-made law requires some reference to natural law. On this understanding of natural law, natural law can be invoked to criticize judicial decisions about what the law says, but not to criticize the best interpretation of the law itself.

Some jurists and scholars use natural law synonymously with natural justice or natural right (Latin ius naturale), while others distinguish between natural law and natural right.”

“Cicero wrote in his De Legibus that both justice and law derive their origin from what nature has given to man, from what the human mind embraces, from the function of man, and from what serves to unite humanity.

For Cicero, natural law obliges us to contribute to the general good of the larger society.

The purpose of positive laws is to provide for “the safety of citizens, the preservation of states, and the tranquility and happiness of human life.”

In this view, “wicked and unjust statutes” are “anything but ‘laws,'” because “in the very definition of the term ‘law’ there inheres the idea and principle of choosing what is just and true.”

Law, for Cicero, “ought to be a reformer of vice and an incentive to virtue.” Cicero expressed the view that “the virtues which we ought to cultivate, always tend to our own happiness, and that the best means of promoting them consists in living with men in that perfect union and charity which are cemented by mutual benefits.”
SOURCE

 

The Isles of Britain: Ourstory

Our ancestral story goes back further than we have been led to believe – way past the principles of law as enshrined in the Great Charter, the Magna Carta of 1215 and to a time predating the arrival of the armies of Rome. For an eloquently straightforward overview of the evidence of the geometrical, architectural and cultural sophistication of our ancestors, the reader is invited to watch the following film by Tom Brooks:

To return to 1215, the most often-referenced parts of the Great Charter are,

+ (39) No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgment of his equals or by the law of the land.

(40) To no one will we sell, to no one deny or delay right or justice.”

Screen Shot 2016-04-21 at 13.13.04

A free man is simply one who is not a slave. In other words, he is a man who is not a citizen; one who has revoked his consent to be governed by authorities which common sense shows him to be tyrannical and oppressive.

We live in times of great deception, where pollutants bombard our earth and our biology from every source (land, sea, air, water and sky/ether); a world in which fake religions like that of Money/Banking, the State-corporate and organisations such as Judaism, Catholicism, Christianity, Islam et al seek to control our minds and hearts. Whether by ill-intended design or not, the effects are the same.

We also live in an era when the Law is being applied selectively by corrupt judges, barristers and solicitors, when corporations have the same rights as persons, Judges ignore the evidence and when certain individuals falsely believe they are above the law.

It logically follows that those who have no knowledge of these matters are those most vulnerable to the sophistry of those who prey on them by way of deception. For instance, until one knows how little power a bailiff has, then one will be thrown into a state of emotional imbalance (fear) which makes one easy to manipulate and vulnerable to attack from those who seek to psychologically, financially or spiritually dominate one.

This, of course, is what lies behind the fake paperwork and oppressive conduct of those who act as ‘debt collectors’. An individual will be similarly fraught with anxiety if he knows not how MON-EY is created. In the sense that huge swathes of people have no idea whence it comes from, what it means and hold the view that it is all-powerful, then they have fallen for a religion for they place blind faith in its ‘magical’ powers. To understand how it is created and controlled to the advantage of an elite is to break its hold over the psyche.

Quite how and why certain individuals and state-corporations seek to achieve such control is for the individual to investigate – the information is out there and people may choose to not use their common sense. They can live in willful ignorance or not.

Screen Shot 2016-04-21 at 13.16.44

What is the truth?

The truth is that which can be evidenced. It does not rely on emotion. The enemies of truth – and there are many – seek to dominate our emotions in order to make feelings reason subordinate to emotion, the result of which is a populace that is easier to control.

Should one doubt that, then ask the question,

Why would a creator give us the ability to reason, if he wanted us to have a blind unquestioning faith in what we’re told, without ever thinking for ourselves based on scientific proof ?”

Who benefits from nihilism?

nihilism |ˈnīəˌlizəmˈnēəˌlizəm|
noun
the rejection of all religious and moral principles, often in the belief that life is meaningless.
• Philosophy extreme skepticism maintaining that nothing in the world has a real existence.
historical the doctrine of an extreme Russian revolutionary party c.1900, which found nothing to approve of in the established social order.

ORIGIN
early 19th cent.: from Latin nihil ‘nothing’ + -ism.

Modern nihilism, whereby the origins of life and life itself are taken to be meaningless and without reason, having begun by way of some mythical ‘big bang’ only leaves us swimming and drowning in a sea of lies. One would do well to ask cui bono (‘who benefits’?) from this state of affairs when millions of people believe that life is meaningless?

To reiterate: historical truth goes by evidence not emotion. Some may say that Magna Carta was based on those principles of law as established by the English king known as Alfred (the Great). Yet what of the more ancients kings of these lands, the ones who were here long before the Saxons and others who invaded these shores? What of those indigenous Britons whose ancestral lineage extends back over 4,000 years into antiquity?

The lies of history have sought to bury that knowledge in favour of those who have usurped these lands for their own material benefit, of which William the Bastard, who invaded in 1066, is a prime example.

Freedom from tyranny

And yet that which is true cannot be buried – or at least not indefinitely. Which is why it is crucial to uncover the hidden history of the indigenous people’s of these islands known as Great Britain.

“tyranny |ˈtirənē|
noun (pl. tyrannies)
cruel and oppressive government or rule: people who survive war and escape tyranny | the removal of the regime may be the end of a tyranny.
• a nation under cruel and oppressive government.
• cruel, unreasonable, or arbitrary use of power or control: she resented his rages and his tyranny | figurative : the tyranny of the nine-to-five day | his father’s tyrannies.
• (especially in ancient Greece) rule by one who has absolute power without legal right.”

When a man finds himself subject to tyranny, it is by way of his common sense and the process of natural law that bring him to rebel and to stand his ground on that which he knows to be true. The tyranny is too much for him to tolerate – he knows it is better to die on one’s feet than on one’s knees.

Such was the state of affairs that led to the sealing of the Magna Carta by the despotic King John at Runnymede in 1215.

A man is a divine body of spirit and matter, as rooted to the earth as he is connected to the heavens in the firmament above, his potential is only limited by his imagination and his connectedness to the great soul from whence he came.

The unearthing of the truth by way of his common sense can effect his escape from the tyranny he perceives. By releasing the mental shackles, he steps into the power of his divinity.

The world of MATTER is inseparable from that of the spirit. Born of mater (mother), one has materialised on these lands in order to play an active role in the world and if tyranny stands in one’s way, then so be it: it must and will be vanquished.

The ancient laws of Britain were laid down by Dyfnal Moel Myd (Dyvnwal Moelmud) and they arise from Natural Law. It is self-evident that they pre-date any of the masses of fake statutory/legal systems of control as traitorously put in place by the psychotic controllers.

The law and society as they stood in ancient Britain during the centuries preceding the Roman invasion of 55 BC. It is based upon the surviving laws of king Dyfnal Moel Myd (Dunvallo Molmutius), who reigned in the 5th-4th centuries BC. The account, from pp. 20-24 of Flinders Petrie’s paper, bears repeated reading, for it reveals a level of culture and literacy amongst the early Britons that is quite unlike the popular image that has been cultivated in recent years by the modernist treatment of British history. It also speaks volumes for the existence of a king whom modernists have always said was a mythical figure, and it reveals our ancestors to have been a highly cultivated and civilised people, and not the illiterate painted savages of popular fame.”

“The condition of pagan Britain is remarkably preserved in the laws of Dyvnal Moelmud. That these laws are certainly long before the tenth century is proved by the gulf that exists between the state of society shown by them and that of the laws of Howel fixed to AD 914.

The laws of Howel show a highly complex and detailed condition of law, and an elaborate royal court, with the rights of officials minutely fixed. In the laws of Moelmud there is very simple law, always subject to proved custom and to adaptation to circumstance; there is no royal court, and very few officials, with no defined claims.

Moreover, the laws of Howel refer back to Moelmud. What takes the laws of Moelmud at least to Roman times is that they are purely Pagan, and the only Christian allusion is an addition to the forms of legal oath, saying that ‘In subsequent times the form of oath was given by the Ten Commandments, the Gospel of St. John, and the blessed Cross’ (no. 219). T

his stamps the previous oaths and the rest of the laws as of the pagan period, and therefore at least of the third century, as British bishops attended the Council of Aries in AD 314. How much farther back these laws may date, towards the traditional time of Moelmud, the fourth or seventh century BC, we cannot now enquire.”
SOURCE

Screen Shot 2016-04-15 at 12.43.48

The laws as codified by Moelmud were based on the ancient rights, usages and customs of the people.

Those principles exemplified in Magna Carta were therefore inspired by and founded in more ancient traditions.

These central tenets of law therefore go back thousands of years.

These laws give a remarkable view of a community with the greatest respect for weakness and misfortune, high rights for women, full consideration for foreigners, and great privilege for learning, for the arts, and the crafts. Social duty was strongly held, and the full power rested on the vote of every free man and woman, even to deposing the king. Arms were prohibited civil assembly, and the harp was as necessary to a free man his coat and his cooking-pot. The whole air is that of simple conditions and a free life, with much personal cultivation and sympathy in general conduct. It would be impossible to produce such a code from a savage or violent people, and this intimate view of their life is the best ground for judging of their qualities. That there was generally a well-organized peace kept in the country is shown by Caesar’s statement that ‘the number of the people is countless, and their buildings exceedingly numerous.”

SOURCE

The Welsh triads

Screen Shot 2016-04-21 at 13.21.42

The Molmutine Laws are given in the form of triads – a poetic form which comes in ‘threes’, an aspect of oral bardic tradition whereby information was more easily memorised:

1. There are three tests of civil liberty: equality of rights, equality of taxation, freedom to come and go.

2. Three things are indispensable to a true union of nations: sameness of laws, rights, and language.

3. There are three things free to all Britons: the forest, the unworked mine, the right of hunting.

4. There are three property birthrights of every Briton: five British acres of land for a home, the right of suffrage in the enacting of the laws, the male at twenty-one, the female on her marriage.

5. There are three things which every Briton may legally be compelled to attend: the worship of God, military service, the courts of law.

6. There are three things free to every man, Briton or foreigner, the refusal of which no law will justify: water from spring, river, or well; firing from a decayed tree; a block of stone not in use.

7. There are three classes which are exempt from bearing arms: bards, judges, graduates in law or religion. These represent God and His peace, and no weapon must ever be found in their hands.

8. There are three persons who have a right of public maintenance: the old, the babe, the foreigner who can not speak the British tongue.

9. There are three things free to a country and its borders: the roads, the rivers, and the places of worship. These are under the protection of God and His peace.”

SOURCE

 

It is those long-established principles which formed the bedrock of the demands made by the Barons to King John in 1215 and which were subsequently used to form the constitution of the United States:

For more than six hundred years– that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215–there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or resisting the execution of, such law.”

–Lysander Spooner, The Right of Juries

They will never be lost as they exist as imprints within the very dna of all free-thinking and righteous peoples across the planet.

Contrary to the deceptions at the heart of nihilism, we are each born free and exist under God only. No man, potentate or de facto agency of the state-corporate can come between the man who knows who he truly is and acknowledges the Golden Rule:

Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.”

That is the legacy of Dyfnal Moel Myd (Dunvallo Molmutius) and the ancient ancestors of the peoples of Britain and that is why a system of control that seeks to bury the principles of justice and divinity by way of ‘Civil Law’ and nihilism is doomed to failure.

Tyranny will fail as it is a closed system that none will thrive under. Freedom will always reign supreme and it is gaining in popular awareness. It is there to be claimed and exemplified by the independent man, not granted by pope, prelate or fake potentate.

Was man created to live in a closed system?

It is a given that freedom is an idea and a natural way of being that can never be vanquished. It is for this reason that the laws of ancient times, the Magna Carta, the common law, the constitution of the united states and all systems of justice that are predicated on them and common sense are as valid now as they have ever been. Their validity is based on them existing as eternal truth and not simply upon some dusty document that the people were not party to.

It may be stated that they are of incalculable value in these times given the demonstrable tyranny of the state-corporate whose modus operandi is more control and less freedom.

All men thrive in an open system of mutually respected freedom – one is free to do as one chooses, providing no harm is caused to his fellow beings.

The Great Charter of 1215 embodied the spirit of that time and it also carried within it the principles behind the more ancient laws of these lands. Those principles hold good today as they are founded in the truth.

RM posits that a Great Charter for the present (2016) has already been created and exists as the treaty of Universal Community Trust, a voluntary association of self-governed individuals, forming anarcho-nations under natural law

Anyone to whom these words and principles resonate in their hearts and minds, is hereby invited to drop their citizenship and declare their individual sovereignty and, under voluntary association with like-minded souls, form his own anarcho-nation, wherever he so be, each living under natural law, in accord with the terms of the treaty. A pdf of such a declaration is attached below along with a Sovereign Declaration by which the individual may relinquish his citizenship.

Blessed be the righteous.

Screen Shot 2016-04-21 at 13.28.36

FOUNDING DEED ANARCHONATION TRUSTEES

INDIVIDUAL SOVEREIGN DECLARATION

As always, a huge thank you to all those readers and listeners who have shown their generous appreciation for my discourses and essays. Should you be able, please chuck a few quid in the pot via the Buy Me a Coffee button and/or take out a subscription to my Substack pages. if you like, you can also support me by taking out a paid subscription which will grant you ‘first dibs’ on my output.
All the very best, Michael.

4

Episode 68: The Glass Menagerie

The Alternative Media Menagerie

The danger of throwing pebbles in a glass house is a suitable metaphor for those fringe magnets who inhabit the snow dome that is the alternative media.

Menagerie noun
a collection of wild animals kept in captivity for exhibition.
a strange or diverse collection of people or things: some other specimen in the television menagerie.
ORIGIN
late 17th century: from French ménagerie, from ménage (see ménage).

Fringe magnets is a term invented by Dom Waterson of the Sheep Farm website and podcast and it means those popular public figures who fret about on the ‘alternative’ stage set of the ‘truth-seekers’. Unfortunately, the stage is populated by a menagerie of statists who are masquerading as free-thinkers.

The Curious Tale of Miri Finch

The menagerie is, of course a reference to the factual existence of financier-state sponsorship of those limited hangouts and agent provocateurs which and who exist in order to corral people into echo chambers where the truth and the facts are sidelined and the participants are led in a circular dance that never goes anywhere and never offers remedies, with the overall effect being to splinter the opposition and to sow doubt in the minds of the public. All of which is its purpose.

In the 1968 film, The News Benders the main character states that 92% of the population have no idea that the news is composed of fake events and falsities of all descriptions. The rest, he says, “work for us”.

The state asset, Marianna Spring is an example of a woman who, though she operates in the lame-stream sewers of the BBC Propaganda Pumping Station, throws around a heap of pebbles as she fact-checks the output of those that the military-industrial complex label conspiracy theorists. The hopeless irony being that she works within an organisation whose modus operandi is the production and dissemination of false narratives, inaccurate information, woke nonsense as well the employment of a plethora of nonces whose slimy trails score across the entire dung-heap of its fetid output.

Never, ever, does she fact check the disinformation that the corporation was created to spew into the minds of the unthinking masses and which it does on a daily basis. I would love to see her critique The News Benders as it is, perhaps a classic example of revelation of the method.

I have previously posited that James Delingpole is one of these types in so far as he has been set up precisely to engage in this type of operation. James loves the shekel, that is true, but is it unreasonable to suggest that he deliberately steers clear of discussing, in any real depth, the nature of the financial fraud and false money system we are having to negotiate as we journey through this shit parade of lies?

Miri Finch is a woman who writes articles on a variety of ‘conspiracy’ issues and she has a sizeable following on Substack. I previously critiqued her article in which claimed Richard D Hall is a deep-state asset and that the Manchester Arena False Flag of 2017 was part of an elaborate, even ingenious plan to curtail freedom of speech. My conclusion was that her writing is largely fallacious and full of airy nothings or empty rhetoric.

Her reliance on empty rhetoric was also clearly demonstrated on a recent podcast with Iain Davis in which she attempted to explain how and why she sees Hall as a state asset – this is from the opening segment to the podcast and is a direct quote of her explanation,

“there are people who believe, as is their right, that the bombing was real and that the victims were injured in that bomb in the way that they said they were and that’s those peoples’ beliefs and if these people have really been injured in the way that they say they have and you’re accusing them of faking, isn’t that completely unacceptable?

No, it’s not unacceptable at all, it’s totally acceptable and not just acceptable but the basis of the judicial system which assumes everyone is innocent until proven guilty. So, whenever you make an accusation of anyone, always the initial assumption is well they are innocent until there’s enough evidence to show either way. So, I said, yes of course, we must accuse potentially innocent people because how do we otherwise get to the truth. We don’t know what the truth is, that’s why (intelligible) … we’re making accusations, so, we’ll just have to go where the evidence takes us.

Erm, now, with, erm, particular people, Martin and Eve Hibbert, … I do think they are victims of something, I just don’t think it’s a bomb, erm, so if we just shut down the conversation, completely and say they’re victims, they’re disabled, they’re vulnerable so they’re beyond reproach, can’t ask any questions of them, then we’re never going to unravel what’s really going on. So, you know, whatever’s really happened to them, we have to risk making false accusations, have to risk being wrong, maybe, you know, apologise for being wrong, but that’s the only way to get to the truth.”

“I think they set up the counter narrative via Richard D Hall. The big red flag to me is the amount of media publicity he gets and it’s not just since [the trial]”

Now, Miri’s schtick and oft-repeated adage is, “if you know the name, they’re in the game.”

By which she means that anyone whose name appears in the media is a player in the mind-control and psy-ops which are perpetrated against the public.

Unfortunately, it is a rather simplistic and very fragile tag-line upon which to hang an ethos or any kind of logic or reasoning.

She states that Richard D Hall is in the ‘game’ because he has been referenced in the lamestream media over the Manchester Arena false flag and what his book revealed, then he must be an actor, whose modus operandi is all scripted and that he must be a security services asset. By that ‘reasoning’, the harassment he received at his market stall in Merthyr Tydfil by Mariana Spring and the subsequent BBC Panorama hit piece on him were all an act, created for the express purpose of demonising ‘conspiracy theorists’ and creating judicial precedents that all serve to curtail freedom of expression.

She is, if I have understood it correctly, claiming that the real controllers are always behind the scenes, anonymously directing the actors who take on the roles assigned to them in the geo-political realm. In this sense, she opines that Hall is a state asset or useful idiot.

If we follow this line of reasoning, then the Crown House of Rothschild is but a front-operation, even though it is a name that is not widely recognised. There is an element of truth in this as the World Crime Syndicate website substantiates.

For the purposes of this essay, let’s take it on face value and state that Miri is correct: that we only know or recognise the names of those who are deeply embedded in the never-ending game of hide and seek and that it is the unnamed controllers who hide in the shadows that are the real initiators of the oh-so-cunning movements of the chess pieces around the geo-political stage.

Now, let’s apply her adage to Mir-i-am herself.

She has stated on the Sheep Farm podcast that her father was employed at Keele University and that that is where she was brought up. But who is her father? How many of us have heard of him?

His name John Sloboda and he is a recipient of the Order of the British Empire and, thus, firmly one of the elite.

His OBE was ‘awarded’ for his service – a service into the uses of music in the realm of psychology, of its use as a tool of mind control.

This is what his Wikipedia entry states about him,

Is it not interesting to note that  Sloboda was the Executive Director of the Oxford Research Group, of which it is stated,

“The Remote Warfare Programme was established in January 2018, based around the Remote Control project of the Network for Social Change, which had been hosted by ORG since 2013.

It analyses shifts in military engagements, focusing on Western states’ increasing focus on working through local and regional partner militaries in places such as the Middle East and Africa.

As part of this, they examine current developments in military technology and doctrine such as cyber-warfare, unmanned weapons systems (such as unmanned aerial vehicles), private military and security contractors, and special operations forces.” source

Note the link with the Network for Social Change and its involvement in

“cyber-warfare, private military and security contractors and special operations forces”

is it not the case that each and every cited example of these limited hangouts is engaging, perhaps not directly, but substantially in each of these areas?

Are any of these players to be trusted?

Does this mean Miriam’s father, John Sloboda, is in the game, as she likes to put it? Maybe. In any event, he is a bona fide member of the establishment on the simple basis he has been awarded an OBE for his service(s). I am also reminded at this point of another accurate and comical expression used by Dom of Sheep Farm, in reference to the family lineage of those who ponce about in various state-sponsored roles and whose families are firmly ‘established’ to the point where there is never any ordinary line of work to which they are associated,

No Plumbers Allowed

Incidentally, and for those who may be curious, neither Dom and Christian or myself are from establishment families; a suggestion which makes me chuckle as I write it and which is easily dispelled by the fact their father was a butcher and small-holder and mine was an engineer, both heralding from Huddersfield, where, interestingly, Miri Finch now resides.

The use of popular music as a mind control technique is well-documented and one only needs to listen to researchers like Mike Williams and read the work of Dave McGowan and Mark Devlin to see how sophisticated this Tavistock-based deployment of music as a psychological tool has been, with the Beatles being perhaps the finest example of its success.

There are numerous links to Sloboda’s work and whilst I have no interest in researching his academic papers, others may be inclined to do so.

If we are to apply Miri’s tenet then does it not follow that – because I have never previously heard of her father, who is a recipient of an OBE and other establishment accolades – that he may well be one of the psychological influencers/manipulators who exist in the shadows and control those ‘names’ she states being in the game?

And what of Miriam herself?

The link to Companies House suggests that she is also a player in the game. Quite how and why she has 3 separate (now dissolved) companies of which she was director is equally suggestive that she too is a player in the “game”.

It is interesting to note that in March, 2021 she joined a “consultant team” at a legal firm as “as a Legal Assistant (Non-Solicitor).”

“The Jonathan Lea Network is now a full service firm of solicitors that employs senior and junior solicitors, trainee solicitors, paralegals and administration staff who all work from a modern open plan office in Haywards Heath. This close-knit retained team is enhanced by a trusted network of specialist consultant solicitors who work remotely and, where relevant, combine seamlessly with the central team.” Source

Gven the fact that no paralegal (like Miri), solicitor, lawyer, attorney or member of the judiciary in the captured UK plc knows anything about the Law, it should come as no surprise that her ‘opinions’ on matters of Law are woolly and inaccurate as can be demonstrated by the above quotation from Iain Davis’ interview with her.

Acrylic Dressed Up as Wool.

Much of what she asserts is as woolly as her beanie (which is most likely acrylic),

“as a non-lawyer there can sometimes be limits to what I can achieve. However, now with the leverage of an established law firm I can work with, my contributions should have considerably more impact, and I’m very excited indeed about what the Jonathan Lea Network and I can achieve together.”

Empty rhetoric, which upon close inspection, amounts to the square root of fook all.

In any event, one does not take up a paid position at a legal firm without satisfying the employment criteria – they would not appoint her if there was any controversy or doubt about her being a loose cannon. She is evidently regarded as a ‘safe pair of hands’, as demonstrated by the firm’s endorsement of her and her appearances on Delingpole’s and Davis’ podcasts, as well as that of the other disinformation pedlar, Aisling (Whatshername).

Davis has appeared on these platforms and even interviewed Miri on his podcast. Why bother with either bint is my question – what purpose can be served by engaging with these women? Why not have me on to discuss the reasons why Judge Steyn’s order is lawfully VOID and what that actually means? Why piss about with a pair of lasses who are manifestly puffed up on their own empty rhetoric?

It is also worth considering what the game is that Iain Davis is playing. For instance, let us take the adage that signs and symbols rule the realm.

Davis’ logo is a strange one: the smiley face and this is very telling.

The inventor of the smiley face logo has made great financial gains from its prevalence.

Its usage began in the 1950s and was dominant in both the controlled hippy movement of the 1960s and the replay that was the acid house of the late 1980s.

There is also William Ramsay’s work on the phenomenon of the Smiley Face Killers.

Notice the blood through the eye – why would Davis choose it as his logo, given the negative associations it has with music and as a symbol for mind control?

The blood smear reminds me of the staged ‘assassination’ attempt on Trump, in which he rises up from behind the podium with a smear across his cheek. The fact that it was, going by the recurring shoe-motif, a freemasonic ritual of some nature may suggest that Davis’ intention behind choosing that particular symbol is also freemasonic in origin.

Delingpole also professes a fondness for the smiley face,

“he spent some time wearing smiley T-shirts and taking Ecstasy. “I think my Ecstasy chapter is one of the best bits of the book,” he says. He’s right. It’s lovingly nostalgic about the club scene during the late 1980s, as well as a savage indictment of it. He tells us about the “warm, beatific smiles” and the “beautiful faces radiating happiness” on the dance floor, as well as the “poo-scented tailwind of the swing doors” in the dreadful lavatories, and the terrible malaise when the drugs wear off.”  source

I would also add that Davis has establishment connections too – Delingpole, UK (MI5) Column, and, “Iain’s work is regularly featured by a number of outlets including The OffGuardian, Lew Rockwell, Technocracy News & Trends and The Corbett Report.”

Each of which, I would posit, are establishment-controlled ‘alternative’ limited hangouts.

Whilst I may be wrong in regard to some of these assertions, I can reassure readers that I am not of their ilk. As stated, my dad was, for forty years, an engineer at David Brown Gears in Lockwood, Huddersfield and neither my paternal line (family name, Kaye) or my maternal line (family name, Thompson) contain any establishment lineage.

Thus, it can be safely said that I am not chucking stones around in a glass menagerie.

On the subject of establishment families, Delingpole was educated at the exclusive and expensive Malvern College and Oxford University and had a career in the mainstream media. His cosiness with Miriam, his glaring omissions on the fake financial system and his blatant connectedness with the establishment all point to him being an establishment-sanctioned ring-master in the interminable realm of the limited hangouts. After all, if we know the name, are they not in the game? And, does that not account for their large audiences?

This may well go some way to explaining how and why he jumped to the defence of Miriam after he had initially shared my article exposing her fallacies and empty rhetoric.

Remember too that each of these referenced commentators have thousands of followers on social media, that they have only recently come to the fore and that, by comparison, I have very few. To be elevated so quickly to such levels of attention is suspicious as we are in an electronic panopticon in which those who are genuine are not permitted to have large followings; their work is suppressed via censorship, the statistics are manipulated – the game is rigged and only the state-sanctioned players are ‘allowed’ audience access of the size these individuals have.

Whilst I get no pleasure of any kind as I write this and would prefer not to examine the grubby antics of these types, it is important to air these matters on the simple basis that the deceptions and frauds of these individuals need exposing.

As one commentator put it, it can be safely stated that I am not on Miriam’s Christmas card list. It is also fair to state that I will not be receiving an invitation to be a guest on the Delingpod.

As always, a huge thank you to Dave, Steve and David R for their generous appreciation of my discourses and essays. Should you be able, please chuck a few quid in the pot via the Buy Me a Coffee button and/or take out a subscription to my Substack pages. if you like, you can also support me by taking out a paid subscription which will grant you ‘first dibs’ on my output.
All the very best, Michael.

0

Episode 67: Eccentric

Your Eccentricity is Divine.

Recorded on 20th November, 2024, this Rogue Cast is on the priceless value of the individual’s eccentricity.

When I was growing up in the town of Huddersfield, eccentricity was relatively commonplace. Those individuals who demonstrated it most were labelled ‘characters’ but there are many other epithets that could be used:

The Great British Eccentric has always been acknowledged as a law unto himself. In 1859, John Stuart Mill published his essay, On Liberty in which he wrote,

The etymology of the term is straightforward –

Eccentric
from Greek ekkentros, from ek ‘out of’ + kentron ‘centre’

Many have rightly posited that statism is a religion and a deadly bind at that for the state is attempting to kill you and has been since you arrived in this realm.

Go for a walk in any town or city and you will notice people who are seemingly unable to cross the road without waiting for the green man light to tell them that it is safe to go. These people may be fairly labelled as morons on the simple premise that they choose to ignore the evidence of their own eyes and ears.

The British government is, in essence, a Bolshevik-Communist-Financier operation and isn’t it telling how the recent lawfare and imprisonment of those who voice their dissidence dovetails perfectly with what Alexander Solschenitzyn noted?

”A communist system can be recognised by the fact that it spares the criminals , and criminalises the political opponent”.

By way of example of eccentricity, I touch also on the idiosyncratic qualities of the comedians of yesteryear who were decidedly and deliberately politically incorrect. As the uniquely-talented Billy Connolly puts it,

“Comedians never used to worry about what was correct to say. You said it, and you soon found out whether it was correct or not. And then you got on with it. And that was a good enough rule for me.” Source.

The peoples of these Isles of Britain are currently under the petulant sway of a collection of fools of whom there are many examples, none more so than the woman acting as the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rachel Reeves, whose fraudulent claim to be an economist has been highlighted since the budgetary attack on British farmers has been revealed to be an attempt to drive them into penury:


What we are witnessing in regard to all of the governmental tyranny is exactly that which Larken Rose and others have labelled statism and it is arguably the most dangerous religion of the lot.

Further to this, I posit that the followers of churchianity are really worshipping the false god of this realm, as epitomised by the fake former archbishop, Justin Welby.

Many viewers will have been ostracised by their families as the black sheep, a position I know all too well but, rather than see it as a character flaw, this is a state of being that should truly be celebrated, just like those who were labelled conscientious objectors who, in previous times, refused to accept the legitimacy of the two world wars and stood their ground on that fact.

The Rogue Cast features the chance discovery of a Polish War memorial in the woods which leads me to consider just what is the meaning of the red poppy and to question what is actually being celebrated on 11/11?

As Smedley Butler plainly stated,

The inevitable conclusion is that the eccentric individual is to be cherished and celebrated for he represents the antidote to the collectivist tyranny that is manifesting around us but which I firmly believe will eventually collapse into a fetid cesspit of its own hubris.

Thank you for watching and reading my Rogue Casts and essays. Should you be able to show your appreciation of my discourses and essays, please tip me a few quid via the Buy Me a Coffee button and/or take out a subscription to my Substack pages.

Alternatively, appreciation may be made by way of a donation in crypto,

Bitcoin receive address: 178UdeXRTSs1hyYHCNDoTPBCDMyUMwyFrE
ETH receive address: 0xdeBBd545FcFB535198227B832299983bC258F32c

0

Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Baskerville 2 by Anders Noren.

Up ↑