Author: ROGUE MALE

Sovereign Being Under Natural Law. Educator. Anarchist. Occasional podcaster. Co-producer & protagonist in the film, The Great British Mortgage Swindle. Founding Trustee of Universal Community Trust. Lives in Bernicia & Deira, one of the Stolen Ancestral Lands of Northern Britain.

The Promissory Note

A friend recently tendered, in good faith, a promissory note to the CEO of Nationwide Building Society to settle and close his mortgage account.

This article examines what happened when the tender of this lawful form of currency was made and how Nationwide  is seeking to rely on a dishonest statement in order to extort moneys it falsely claims are owed.

It should be read in conjunction with this previous article in which I cite the investigation, material evidence and conclusions of Professor Richard Werner concerning how the Licensed Credit Brokers, of which Nationwide is but one.

First and foremost, it is of crucial importance that we distinguish between what is a bank and those who are merely masquerading as such.

Each and every ‘bank’ in the UK is actually a Credit broker, licensed under the aegis of the Bank of England (BOE) of which William Paterson, founder of  the BOE in 1694, then a privately owned bank, stated,

“The bank hath benefit of interest on all moneys which it creates out of nothing.”

Any and all so-called ‘banks’ are in fact merely credit brokers, licenced by the BOE, which are in the business of buying and selling securities like Deeds of Mortgage. As Professor Richard Werner states,

“I will tell you key points about banks. In case you thought banks lend money, they take deposits and lend money. You are wrong . Banking was developed, modern banking was developed, in the United Kingdom in the 17th century and the legal facts are very clear but not very well known. Banks do not take deposits and banks do not lend money. That’s a fact.”

Whilst the system of credit creation is duplicitously used to enslave the people by way of its misrepresentation of any and all loans (including mortgages), it is also a fact that we, as blessed creative living souls are the creditors of the credit system. It is, quite literally, a fact that it cannot exist without us.

Credit is created from the individual’s own creative abilities which are transformed into a system whereby this capacity is utilised to create money as debt also know as hypothecation:

“from medieval Latin hypothecat- ‘given as a pledge,’ from the verb hypothecare, based on Greek hupothēkē .”

In essence, it is the  promise to pay (pledge) which creates the credit. In this sense, it is not true to state the credit is created out of thin air. Interestingly a mortgage translates as a ‘dead’ pledge (promise).

“late Middle English: from Old French, literally ‘dead pledge,’ from mort (from Latin mortuus ‘dead’) + gage ‘pledge.’ ”

A promise satisfied by death? A promise without life? Why might that be the case? Death of what or who? Does it mean it is a promise which will only be satisfied when the individual dies? How could that be the case? Why would its extinguishment be dependent upon his death?

If the credit is created by the individual’s capacity to create then has a loan actually taken place?

It is a fact that the licenced credit broker ( the fake ‘bank’) does not lend its own funds – the book keeping entries prove that. The mechanics of credit creation under a fiat currency system are based entirely on the hypothecation of the individual’s promise to pay. That, of course, is how and why Bank of England notes are backed only by this hypothecation or what is an illusory promise, as per the definition above. A ten pound note can no longer be cashed in for ten pounds of sterling silver.

Note: the hypothecation is essentially a chimera as, in credit-based financial system, it is simply the individual’s promise to pay that creates the line of credit which is used to purchase the property outright.

More on this can be read in the comment below the essay, posted today (27/08/25) by Pat Cusack

There was a time when I was of the view that I had actually received moneys from the bank’s own coffers and, that being the case, I had to pay it back as it was not mine. I genuinely believed that a loan had been made and that it was one which I had solemnly promised to pay back. This I dutifully did, to the best of my ability, compound interest and all, to a total amount that equated with double that which I falsely believed I had borrowed – £67, 747 on an initial loan of £34, 000.

It was, however, an illusion. In fact, the whole thing was one big lie put to paper by way of the Deed of Mortgage which operates as a charge over the house in favour of the ‘bank’. Money has only the value we attach to it. Just like playing a game of monopoly. Pieces of paper are accrued or lost by way of the roll of the dice. It is a game of chance and decision in which the Bank of England has all the power.

So, if a ‘mort-gage’ is a promise/pledge to the death, what would its opposite be? A promise of life?

God gives us life. Satan, death. A mortgage is a work of satan. From this it follows that a mortgage is anti-life, which is likely related to the French origin of the term.

“Satan Old English, via late Latin and Greek from Hebrew śāṭān, literally ‘adversary,’ from śāṭan ‘plot against.’ ’’

Given the extent to which Western Civilisation is built upon the key tenets of the holy science currently known as Christianity, why then would the church of God not warn its flock about the inherent workings of such a device that is designed to enslave, ensnare and is of such an invidious nature as to be abhorrent to spiritual practice? So much so that Jesus, the inspirational being at the heart of its teachings, turned over the table of the money changers (bankers) when he discovered them to be operating in the temple?

No man of God should be going anywhere near a mortgage for it is a devilish device designed to entrap his soul, at least on the basis of its etymological origins, to a promise of death and yet the Church of England is hugely invested in the very financial apparatus that the Bible condemns.

Regardless of one’s take on the nature of this realm, we are here, in our avatars, to live – it is a journey of the soul.

A mortgage, founded upon the false pretext that a loan has taken place is the opposite to that. Thus, it is anti-life. Inevitably, mortgages that spring from a fiat currency are effectively unconscionable devices used for the purposes of indentured servitude that tie the people down by way of stealing energy via the fake ‘charge’.

I realise this may seem simplistic to many who will claim that I am reading too much into it and that it means no such thing because of its every day usage but that would be an appeal to common practice and, as such, fallacious. For the facts of the matter are plain:

1. No loan takes place, the credit is created by the pledge, the promise to pay.

2. The promissory note created on the back of the void mortgage deed is, in effect, a cash asset (deposit) given to the bank by the purported ‘mortgagor’.

3. Usury is the immoral practice of charging interest on purported loans. When no actual loan has taken place, it is self-evidently iniquitous, to put it mildly.

4. There is no valid power of attorney.

5. The failure to disclose how the real nature of the transaction by which credit is created renders the agreement void.

6. There is no lawful contract signed by both parties and as required at law, under s.2 of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1989.

7. The mortgage deed is a lie put to paper, signed by the individual under the instruction of his conveyancing solicitor before he is the beneficial owner of the home, with the necessary proprietary interest.

The deception runs through every aspect of our lives and it has been existent for hundreds, if not thousands of years. There is nothing new under the sun,

“Now governmental borrowing was a fact of life. William and his government had surrendered the English nation’s sovereign prerogative to create and control its own money, and had passed on to the English nation a 1.2 million pound debt plus interest which had to be paid out of taxation. If the government created its own money, interest-free and debt-free, there would be no national debt and very little need for taxation as the government would not be short of the money for health, education and the armed forces. The English nation HAS NEVER RECOVERED, and is still paying interest on money borrowed to fight the Napoleonic Wars.

“In 1694 William – without consulting Parliament – borrowed 1,200,000 pounds in gold from the Jewish money-changers at 8 percent interest, which was to be repaid a year later. The Jews agreed to lend him the money on the condition that he gave them permission to establish a Bank of England and print for themselves in banknotes a sum equal to the King’s indebtedness. He thus agreed to pay them 108 percent in bank notes, plus the 8 percent interest” – Nicholas Hagger (Secret History of the West)

Richard Werner is 100% correct in his assertions, and to whom the following is entirely credited, but he is certainly not the first to express the facts, as he readily acknowledges herein. The reader is invited to read and re-read this carefully for it is the unassailable truth:

“In modern times private bankers discontinued issuing notes, and merely created Credits in their customers’ favour to be drawn against by Cheques. These Credits are in banking language termed Deposits. Now many persons seeing a material Bank Note, which is only a Right recorded on paper, are willing to admit that a Bank Note is cash.

But, from the want of a little reflection, they feel a difficulty with regard to what they see as Deposits. They admit that a Bank Note is an “Issue”, and “Currency,” but they fail to see that a Bank Credit is exactly in the same sense equally an “Issue,” “Currency,” and “Circulation”.”

[Macleod (1905, vol. 2, p. 310)]

“… Sir Robert Peel was quite mistaken in supposing that bankers only make advances out of bona fide capital. This is so fully set forth in the chapter on the Theory of Banking, that we need only to remind our readers that all banking advances are made, in the first instance, by creating credit” (p. 370, emphasis in original).

In his Theory of Credit Macleod (1891) put it this way:

“A bank is therefore not an office for “borrowing” and “lending” money, but it is a Manufactory of Credit.”
[Macleod (1891: II/2, 594)]

According to the credit creation theory then, banks create credit in the form of what bankers call ‘deposits’, and this credit is money. But how much credit can they create? Wicksell (1907) described a credit- based economy in the Economic Journal, arguing that

“The banks in their lending business are not only not limited by their own capital; they are not, at least not immediately, limited by any capital whatever; by concentrating in their hands almost all payments, they themselves create the money required….”

“In a pure system of credit, where all payments were made by transference in the bank-books, the banks would be able to grant at any moment any amount of loans at any, however diminutive, rate of interest.”
[Wicksell (1907, 214)]

Withers (1909), from 1916 to 1921 the editor of the Economist, also
saw few restraints on the amount of money banks could create out of nothing:

“… it is a common popular mistake, when one is told that the banks of the United Kingdom hold over 900 millions of deposits, to open one’s eyes in astonishment at the thought of this huge amount of cash that has been saved by the community as a whole, and stored by them in the hands of their bankers, and to regard it as a tremendous evidence of wealth. But this is not quite the true view of the case. Most of the money that is stored by the community in the banks consists of book-keeping credits lent to it by its bankers.”
[Withers (1909, pp. 57 ff.)]

“… The greater part of the banks’ deposits is thus seen to consist, not of cash paid in, but of credits borrowed. For every loan makes a deposit ….”
[Withers (1909, p. 63)]

“When notes were the currency of commerce a bank which made an advance or discounted a bill gave its customer its own notes as the proceeds of the operation, and created a liability for itself. Now, a bank makes an advance or discounts a bill, and makes a liability for itself in the corresponding credit in its books.”
[Withers (1909, p. 66)]

We ‘know from Keynes’ contribution to the Macmillan Committee (1931) that Keynes meant with this that each individual bank was able to create credit:

“It is not unnatural to think of the deposits of a bank as being created by the public through the deposit of cash representing either savings or amounts which are not for the time being required to meet expenditure. But the bulk of the deposits arise out of the action of the banks themselves, for by granting loans, allowing money to be drawn on an overdraft or purchasing securities a bank creates a credit in its books, which is the equivalent of a deposit” (p. 34).

All of which points to the veracity and sheer matter-of-factness of Lord Denning’s famous assertion that,

“We have repeatedly said in this court that a bill of exchange or a promissory note is to be treated like cash. It is to be honoured unless there is some good reason to the contrary,”

The foregoing brings us nicely back to the current situation in 2024 – namely that the delivery of a Promissory Note to the CEO of Nationwide, made by my friend, stands as a genuine settlement of the purported balance on his ‘mortgage’. The note is similar to this, which, by way of an example, contains the monetary value of the one I sent to Richard Pym, the then CEO of the Bradford and Bingley licenced broker that falsely claimed I owed them the stated total value (including their phoney legal costs as of April, 2010)


It is completely without doubt and factually correct to state that the licenced credit broker (Nationwide) has the ability to deposit the note in a special account and stream a line of credit that, as a matter of accountancy fact, will zero the balance. That, after all, is the very business it is engaged in.

I did the same some 14 years ago and the response was, more or less,  the same as this which is dated 27th August, 2024.

It is hard to imagine a more blatantly dishonest statement. In fact, the Nationwide is attempting to rely on this lie in order to steal his home. That is as clear an example of fraud as can be envisaged.

Whilst I am well-aware that the individual who sent the letter simply does not know how the very institution he is working for operates in the business of credit creation, it matters not one jot – he is lying.

In each and every case that I know of, including my own, the ‘bank’ never returns the note. Why might that be the case?

It is also to be noted that this is a legal tender of currency, an honourable payment made using the same specie of currency from which the original credit to buy the house was created.

The licenced broker creates the credit from depositing promissory notes and securities but it will refuse a genuine attempt to clear the balance by way of the same?

Ask yourself this – is it possible to imagine a more blatant example of financial enslavement? Of tyrannical despotism? Of Satanic fraud?

After all, given we are the creditors of the financial system, how could we possibly be indebted?

Nevertheless and regardless of the dishonesty of Nationwide, anyone can issue a Promissory Note to settle and close a mortgage account. Am I suggesting you try it? Why not?

If we had a truthful financial system, then what would happen once the shackles of fake debt are removed?

The answer to the last question, for those who have read this far and are paying attention can be reduced to 3 letters – UCT.

And on that ‘note’, I will end for now, with the ‘promise’ of more to follow on this most salient issue.

________________________________________

Thank you for reading and listening to this Rogue Rant. As ever, I am very grateful to those who have chucked a few quid into the coffers by way of the  Buy Me a Coffee button and/or have taken out a subscription to my Substack pages where, if you like, you can also support me by taking out a paid subscription which will grant you ‘first dibs’ on my output.

 

4

The Financial Sleuth

Sleuth Investigation Conclusively Demonstrates That the Financial System is Credit-based and that Any and All Loans are Illusory.

This essay was originally written in 2018 and has been revised in acknowledgement of the great exemplary work of Richard Werner – X link, one of the few, if not the only financial academic who examines the subject of Money/Credit and its creation in any detail.

At the heart of #TGBMS lies the fact that the banks do not make loans of money from their own deposits and that they merely extend credit on the back of fraudulent mortgage deeds.

For a number of years now, the fraudulent nature and illimitable potential for abuse of power associated with modern day banking practices has become increasingly clear to those few who are willing to dig into the actual monetary mechanics of banking i.e how ‘loans’ are created by the purported ‘lenders’ as debt.

On 26th August, 2009, I stepped into Nottingham County Court to defend a fraudulent possession claim made by agents for the Bradford and Bingley Building Society and boldly declared that it was my “duty” to get to the heart of this issue.  In that moment I  also became a financial sleuth, not out of choice but obligation. 16 years on and my mission continues and so does Richard Werner’s:

The ‘modern’ mechanics of money are more simple than many would have us believe. It boils down to this:

the ‘promise to pay’ is what creates the credit.

When a loan agreement or a mortgage deed is signed, that creates a financial instrument. The fact that the individual’s promise to pay – whether it be by way of a loan agreement or the ‘dead’ pledge that is a mortgage – is a financial instrument that is founded on the hypothecation of his future earnings. In other words, he is deceived into signing a valuable financial instrument which is procured by his negligent conveyancing solicitor and which, in the words of Lord Denning, is “as good as cash.”

Anyone who is actively investigating these matters is operating as a financial sleuth:

“sleuth |slo͞oTH| informal

noun

a detective.

verb [ no obj. ] (often as noun sleuthing)

carry out a search or investigation in the manner of a detective: scientists began their genetic sleuthing for honey mushrooms four years ago.

• [ with obj. ] dated investigate (someone or something).

ORIGIN

Middle English (originally in the sense ‘track,’ in sleuth-hound): from Old Norse slóth; compare with slot2. Current senses date from the late 19th cent.”

The attached PDF – “Can banks individually create money out of nothing? — was written by The theories and the empirical evidence” by Richard A. Werner, Centre for Banking, Finance and Mr Werner when he was working in the  Sustainable Development at the University of Southampton, United Kingdom. Richard’s detailed investigation into the mechanics of how an actual ‘loan’ is created stands as a monolith to the fraud of the fake licenced credit providers.

It is an admirable piece of sleuthing.  After enquiring at a number of High Street banks, the only bank that agreed to allow an in-depth examination of the actual monetary mechanics behind the ‘creation’ of a €200, 000 loan is a small German one:

“Raiffeisenbank Wildenberg e.G., located in a small town in the district of Lower Bavaria […]. The bank is a co- operative bank within the Raiffeisen and cooperative banking association of banks, with eight full-time staff. “

The entire process was documented and filmed in August, 2013.

The ledger entries are noted, as are the appearances of liabilities and assets on the books of the bank and its officers’ interactions with each other and/or other banks are recorded. As the author states, what is unravelled here is five thousand years of banking practice.

It is interesting to note that the staff, though open to the process, are seemingly blind to the actual mechanics themselves – i.e none of them seem particularly clear as to how it actually happens.  This, of course, makes sense for the controllers – why would the House of Rothschild want anyone below a certain level of its modus operandi to be knowledgeable about how the process works? After all once sufficient numbers understood the workings of the banking fraud, the truth would spill out to sufficient numbers of people and the game would be over:

Previously, the only time a court case has gone in favour of one who claimed he was loaned nothing, was the Credit River Case in America which resulted in a jury finding in favour of the mortgagor and the judge, Martin Mahoney being poisoned on a fishing trip.  Fishy, being the operative word:

“the 1969 trial of Jerome Daly vs the First National Bank of Montgomery. A Minnesota Trial Court’s decision holding the Federal Reserve Act unconstitutional and VOID; holding the National Banking Act unconstitutional and VOID; declaring a mortgage acquired by the First National Bank of Montgomery, Minnesota in the regular course of its business, along with the foreclosure and the sheriff’s sale, to be VOID. To be short and sweet, banks can’t legally foreclose on your house because the money put up by the banks never actually exists and makes the contract void.”

The case can be viewed here:

 

and read about more extensively here:

“Daly, an attorney representing himself, argued that the bank had put up no real money for his loan. The courtroom proceedings were recorded by Associate Justice Bill Drexler, whose chief role, he said, was to keep order in a highly charged courtroom where the attorneys were threatening a fist fight. Drexler hadn’t given much credence to the theory of the defense, until Mr. Morgan, the bank’s president, took the stand. To everyone’s surprise, Morgan admitted that the bank routinely created money “out of thin air” for its loans, and that this was standard banking practice. “It sounds like fraud to me,” intoned Presiding Justice Martin Mahoney amid nods from the jurors.”

In his court memorandum, Justice Mahoney stated:

“Plaintiff admitted that it, in combination with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis,  did create the entire $14,000.00 in money and credit upon its own books by bookkeeping entry. That this was the consideration used to support the Note dated May 8, 1964 and the Mortgage of the same date. The money and credit first came into existence when they created it. Mr. Morgan admitted that no United States Law or Statute existed which gave him the right to do this. A lawful consideration must exist and be tendered to support the Note.”

The court rejected the bank’s claim for foreclosure, and the defendant kept his house. To Daly, the implications were enormous. If bankers were indeed extending credit without consideration – without backing their loans with money they actually had in their vaults and were entitled to lend – a decision declaring their loans void could topple the power base of the world. He wrote in a local news article:

“This decision, which is legally sound, has the effect of declaring all private mortgages on real and personal property, and all U.S. and State bonds held by the Federal Reserve, National and State banks to be null and void. This amounts to an emancipation of this Nation from personal, national and state debt purportedly owed to this banking system. Every American owes it to himself . . . to study this decision very carefully . . . for upon it hangs the question of freedom or slavery.” SOURCE

The premise for Werner’s recent investigation is sound: he begins by stating his aim as to find out which of the 3 commonly held ‘theories’ about credit creation is true:

  1. Are loans created from deposits which are loaned out?
  2. Are loans created by way of fractional reserve banking practices, through ‘systemic interaction?
  3. Are loans created out of thin air?

“According to the financial intermediation theory of banking, banks are merely intermediaries like other non-bank financial institutions, collecting deposits that are then lent out. According to the fractional reserve theory of banking, individual banks are mere financial intermediaries that cannot create money, but collectively they end up creating money through systemic interaction. A third theory maintains that each individual bank has the power to create money ‘out of nothing’ and does so when it extends credit (the credit creation theory of banking).”

It is a fine piece of financial sleuthing and one which demands to be read by any one with a fully functioning capacity to consider such matters – which, in reality, should be everyone on the simple basis that it is the gargantuan issue that affects us all.

In a previous article, I explained how woefully inadequate my Economics A-Level had been in so far as it went nowhere near this issue of how money is created. John Meynard Keynes was the ‘guru’ whose work formed the basis for much of what was ‘taught’. Werner is less than impressed with the work of said economist, a man who shifted his position and who was responsible for much of the confusion and fudging that dominated twentieth century thinking on these matters:

“Keynes used his considerable clout to slow scientific analysis of the question whether banks could create money, as he instead engaged in ad hominem attacks on followers of the credit creation theory. Despite his enthusiastic early support for the credit creation theory (Keynes, 1924), only six years later he was condescending, if not dismissive, of this theory, referring to credit creation only in inverted commas. He was perhaps even more dismissive of supporters of the credit creation theory, who he referred to as being part of the “Army of Heretics and Cranks, whose numbers and enthusiasm are extraordinary”, and who seem to believe in “magic” and some kind of “Utopia” (Keynes, 1930, vol. 2, p. 215).”

It is self-evident that when men rely on fake authority figures such as Keynes, and fail to sleuth the facts out for themselves, confusion and ignorance reign. In such a state, predators like the House of Rothschild and all those who know the ‘secrets’ of monetary mechanics are able to take control and completely dominate the world by way of their hidden knowledge. They are not gods but to the average man, who has no such knowledge, they appear to be so.

In order to keep the secret, those Fake Gods Who Wear White Collars need to employ others who will not spill the beans. Thus, Freemasonic lodges and other hidden groups of influence are created to maintain and, when necessary, exert violence, in order to keep the secrets.

A few years ago, a man opined that by exposing The Great British Mortgage Swindle, I was ‘stealing the dreams of the ordinary man.” My reply was that, on the contrary, I am exposing the nefarious greed of those who act as gods and prevent the ordinary man from reaching his full potential.

That is the truth of the matter. It is also what makes ‘Money’ the world’s biggest religion – nobody appears to really know where and how it comes about yet billions believe in its magical nature without question:

ONE EYE TO CONTROL THEM ALL
ONE EYE TO CONTROL THEM ALL

Yet, over one hundred years ago, this very religion and its practices were being scrutinised:

“In modern times private bankers discontinued issuing notes, and merely created Credits in their customers’ favour to be drawn against by Cheques. These Credits are in banking language termed Deposits. Now many persons seeing a material Bank Note, which is only a Right recorded on paper, are willing to admit that a Bank Note is cash. But, from the want of a little reflection, they feel a difficulty with regard to what they see as Deposits. They admit that a Bank Note is an “Issue”, and “Currency,” but they fail to see that a Bank Credit is exactly in the same sense equally an “Issue,” “Currency,” and “Circulation”.”

[Macleod (1905, vol. 2, p. 310)]

“… Sir Robert Peel was quite mistaken in supposing that bankers only make advances out of bona fide capital. This is so fully set forth in the chapter on the Theory of Banking, that we need only to remind our readers that all banking advances are made, in the first instance, by creating credit” (p. 370, emphasis in original).

In his Theory of Credit Macleod (1891) put it this way:

“A bank is therefore not an office for “borrowing” and “lending” money, but it is a Manufactory of Credit.”

[Macleod (1891: II/2, 594)]

To return to the sleuthing Professor, the evidence uncovered by Werner confirms what I and others have been asserting: the customer’s signature on the agreement (the pledge) creates the financial instrument which, in turn, creates the ‘magical’ deposit:

“Starting by analysing the liability side information (Table 7), we find that customer deposits are considered part of the financial institution’s balance sheet. This contradicts the financial intermediation theory, which assumes that banks are not special and are virtually indistinguishable from non-bank financial institutions that have to keep customer deposits off balance sheet. In actual fact, a bank considers a customers’ deposits starkly differently from non-bank financial institutions, who record customer deposits off their balance sheet. Instead we find that the bank treats customer deposits as a loan to the bank, recorded under rubric ‘claims by customers’, who in turn receive as record of their loans to the bank (called ‘deposits’) what is known as their ‘account statement’. This can only be reconciled with the credit creation or fractional reserve theories of banking.” [P15]

The conclusions of the report are clear: the promise to pay creates the credit which is misnamed money and that created by way of digits tapped into a computerised account:

“It was examined whether in the process of making money available to the borrower the bank transfers these funds from other accounts (within or outside the bank). In the process of making loaned money available in the borrower’s bank account, it was found that the bank did not transfer the money away from other internal or external accounts, resulting in a rejection of both the fractional reserve theory and the financial intermediation theory. Instead, it was found that the bank newly ‘invented’ the funds by crediting the borrower’s account with a deposit, although no such deposit had taken place. This is in line with the claims of the credit creation theory.

Thus it can now be said with confidence for the first time – possibly in the 5000 years’ history of banking – that it has been empirically demonstrated that each individual bank creates credit and money out of nothing, when it extends what is called a ‘bank loan’. The bank does not loan any existing money, but instead creates new money. The money supply is created as ‘fairy dust’ produced by the banks out of thin air. The implications are far-reaching.”

The implications are gargantuan indeed.

It is my view that Werner’s conclusion that banks ‘create money out of thin air’  thoroughly exposes the swindle.

In support of his paper, I would add the following points:

The assertion that the credit/money is created out of thin air as a kind of magic trick overlooks the fact that the individual’s promise to pay – whether it be by way of a loan agreement or the ‘dead’ pledge that is a mortgage – forms the basis of a financial instrument that is founded on the hypothecation of his future earnings. Or, his ability to ‘repay’ the credit, which is an oxymoron, of course.

His conclusion could be clearer if he stated that no ‘loan’ takes place. It is simply an extension of credit made from the deposit of the cash asset – the security that is backed by the promise to pay: an extension of credit that is fraudulently represented as a loan.

Ultimately, it is an elaborate game of ‘magical’ book-keeping with the banks currently hiding the other side of the ledger that demonstrates a deposit has been made.

Nevertheless, it is a splendid piece of research from which we can begin airing the facts of monetary mechanics and, as such, an individual could certainly enter it into court as compelling evidence in a claim/defence against a bank that no moneys are owed.

The ramifications of these findings are huge. Little wonder, Ross Cranston, acting as the presiding judge, stated to me, in an initial aside at the start of the hearing in February 2015 that if he allowed my claim for negligence vs the conveyancing solicitor to be awarded in my favour  it would result in the entire edifice collapsing.  Sir Cranston, I would wager, does have some understanding of how credit is created, having also written papers on international banking law. Indeed, the banks and the judiciary have been warned, time after time:

As Sir Josiah Stamp, president of the Bank of England declared in an address at the University of Texas in 1927:

“The modern banking system manufactures money out of nothing. The process is perhaps the most astounding piece of sleight of hand that was ever invented. Banking was conceived in inequity and born in sin . . . . Bankers own the earth. Take it away from them but leave them the power to create money, and, with a flick of a pen, they will create enough money to buy it back again. . . . Take this great power away from them and all great fortunes like mine will disappear, for then this would be a better and happier world to live in. . . . But, if you want to continue to be the slaves of bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, then let bankers continue to create money and control credit.”

And, Robert B. Anderson, Secretary of the Treasury under Eisenhower, said in an interview reported in the August 31, 1959 issue of U.S. News and World Report:

“When a bank makes a loan, it simply adds to the borrower’s deposit account in the bank by the amount of the loan. The money is not taken from anyone else’s deposit; it was not previously paid in to the bank by anyone. It’s new money, created by the bank for the use of the borrower.”

Richard Pym: ex CEO of bailed-out B&B of UKAR.
Richard Pym: ex CEO of bailed-out B&B of UKAR.

It was this awareness that led me to challenge his bank to prove it had loaned me any of its own moneys. Of course, its CEO, Richard Pym (left), refused to do so on the simple basis he could not provide any evidence of such.

Slavery is where we are at – paying a fake mortgage debt under threat of eviction is extortion and is nothing short of indentured servitude. The genocidal lengths the banks go to collect on these imaginary loans is perfectly illustrated in the Great British Mortgage Swindle which confronts the issue full on, in heart-wrenching and graphic detail.

SUCKING AT THE ROTHSCHILD TEAT
SUCKING AT THE ROTHSCHILD TEAT

Professor Werner’s report stands as a remarkable and  admirable piece of sleuthing: another nail in the coffin of the fake money masters, the House of Rothschild and their sycophantic henchmen who operate at various levels within the rigged game. The rigged game of banking and its acolytes who inhabit the legal professions and the judiciary, that is.

From time to time over the last 16 years, I have questioned my own sanity in regard to this very issue – it is so monstrous in its scope and effect that it couldn’t possibly be true, could it?

Well, it most certainly is.

Thus, the converse is true: for an individual to believe he was in receipt of a loan is insane. Welcome to the nut house.

____________________________________________________________________

Thank you for your attention. Ironically enough, I am still without a UK bank account and I am currently homeless, which means any and all donations are most helpful and truly appreciated at this time, so please feel free to chuck a few quid into the Rogue Male coffers.

Therefore, if you’re able, please consider taking out a paid subscription on Substack or donate via the Rogue Male Coffee Pot.

Until the next time, all the very best to you and yours and, remember, Fortune truly Favours the Brave.

_____________________________________________________________

 

Acknowledgements: Richard Werner for his continued excellence and for a brilliant piece of work;  Timothy Madden, another analyst whose work shines a light into the hidden world of monetary mechanics;  Jerome Daly for his stand against this iniquitous practice and, Martin Mahoney the judge with the balls who was bumped off. 

Further reading:

1. Minnesota Judge Allegedly Poisoned In 1969 After Ruling Against Corrupt Banksters

2. PDF OF Richard Werner’s investigation prof-richard-werner-banks-create-money-from-nothing

3. The Great British Mortgage Swindle (TGBMS) Links

a. Buy the DVD

b. Watch on Amazon Prime

4. For Whom the Bell Tolls

5. Money’s Secrets

6. Renegade Inc interview with Michael O’Bernicia and yours truly

7.  Who is the Holder of Your Mortgage Deed?

 

11

The Pied Pipers: A Rogue Rant

In this Rogue Rant, I once again take aim at the 3 Stooges who front Reform UK, Restore Britain and Advance UK – namely, Messrs Farage, Lowe and Habib, the 3 former investment bankers who deem themselves to be the best candidates to front up the opposition to the criminally absurd UK Government.

I’ve written many an article about this, and in fact I’ve touched on this subject many times, and what we’re dealing with here is the trivium, or less prosaically, less academically: the ability to think critically.

Does Rupert have it?

I doubt it.

It is a circus of distraction, a whirling cloud of smoke and mirrors which, to any one who is able to apply critical thinking, is aimed at pacifying the people by leading them into a cul-de-sac of empty rhetoric.

When it boils down to it, all power lies with the individual.

End of rant.

_______________________________

Thank you for your attention. I am still without a UK bank account and I am currently homeless, which means any and all donations are most helpful and truly appreciated at this time, so please feel free to chuck a few quid into the RogueMale coffers.

Therefore, if you’re able, please consider taking out a paid subscription on Substack or donate via the Rogue Male Coffee Pot.

Until the next time, all the very best to you and yours and, remember, Fortune truly Favours the Brave.

4

For Whom the Bell Tolls

For whom the Bell Tolls

No man is an island,
Entire of itself.
Each is a piece of the continent,
A part of the main.
If a clod be washed away by the sea,
Europe is the less.
As well as if a promontory were.
As well as if a manor of thine own
Or of thine friend’s were.
Each man’s death diminishes me,
For I am involved in mankind.
Therefore, send not to know
For whom the bell tolls,
It tolls for thee.

By John Donne

Notes:

My recent Rogue Rant over Farage, Lowe and Habib – the ex-investment bankers who steadfastly refuse to rock the boat and consider the one ring to control it all – money/credit creation and control:


Does this make them faux leaders of the controlled opposition?

I posit that is the case.

Witness their collective and individual silence over the subject, the promulgation of the fake debt notion and their complete avoidance of MagnaCarta2025

Each of them has never experience penury, homelessness or what it is to not have a pot to piss in.
The British Class (caste) system – rooted in the private and public school education – indoctrination – system.

I muse on how none of them ever go near the subject of law – MC25 – the Golden Rule – instead, they post platitudes, empty rhetoric and memes like Detain, Deport, ‘Restore Britain’ and the illusion of a National Debt to the Houses of Rothschild, aka the fake banks, the licenced credit brokers.

The X doctrinal policy of freedom of speech but not reach is as persistent as it ever was – a suppression that began in the Convid days, and which has continued to this day.

I pontificate on the illusion of money and the law and how, from personal experience, it is clear that you will be suppressed by the algorithms of the various media platforms if you go into these subjects.

My personal recommendation of the exemplary work of Richard Werner – X link, one of the few who examines the subject of Money/Credit and its creation in any detail.

It is factually correct to state that NO LOAN ever takes place, whether it be to an individual, a council or the government of a country.

The greatest psy-op is this one Ring of Power – and one of a number of extraordinary men to point it out was Henry Ford,

I reference  Paget’s Law of Banking (1904), from which the following quote is taken,

Paget’s Laws of Banking (1904)

P266.
In Ex parte Brett, L. R., 6 Ch. 841, it is implied that where a person accepts bills, not being under actual liability to do so, on having bills of lading transferred to him, those bills become part of his estate, though he can only hold them as security for the liability he incurs on behalf of the drawer.

Probably, as Mr. Chalmers says, “there is a kind of mixed property in the goods, both drawer and acceptor having a defeasible interest therein,” the acceptor’s interest extending to justify anything necessary for his protection or indemnity.

If the banker do not accept the bill of exchange he has no right to keep the bill of lading or other document of title, and no property in the goods passes to him. (Sale of Goods Act, 1898, s. 19, sub-s. 8; cf. Calm v. IW.-.7/X, (V.. Company [1899] 1 Q. B. 648.) As between the banker and the customer, an undertaking to forward bills of lading against acceptance will give the banker who has accepted the bill an equitable claim to the bill of lading, equivalent to a valid hypothecation of it, which would hold good against the customer’s trustee in bankruptcy. (Lutschcrv. Comptoird’Escompte,1Q.B.D. 709.)

But as against third parties, it would seem that nothing short of possession of the documents, or at least constructive possession of them, as by their having been posted to the banker, will give him a good title to the goods.“

The highlighted line further illustrates the point about how the Licenced Lenders of UK and elsewhere have ZERO right to possess anyone’s home when they do not have the ORIGINAL and VALID Deed of Mortgage. All of which is why the Great British Mortgage Swindle is a criminal racket of staggering proportions.

 

Even the former governor of the Bank of England, Joshua Stamp admitted to the fraud of the Rothschild controlled banks,


In simple terms, Monetary mechanics demonstrates that a credit card is a fraudulent representation of the facts – the notion that credit can and has to be paid back when it inverted as a ‘loan’. There is literally nothing to ‘pay back’.

The same applies to loans to buy homes. By way of example, when I bought my home in 1994 the credit extension, based on my salary at the time was some £34k, of which I had ‘paid back’ some £67k by 2010 when I was unlawfully evicted after challenging the Bradford and Bingley to prove a loan had been made and that there was a lawful mortgage deed and contract in place.

When it failed to do so, I launched a counter claim vs said credit provider and the fake lender immediately appointed barrister Benjamin Wood, a former banker at N.M Rothschild of London to shut me down and have me unlawfully evicted. The levels of psychopathy that were unleashed were incredible to experience.

My measured rant was posted on Rupert Lowe’s X account under a post he had made about the illusory National Debt – whilst his post had over 440k views, due to the algorithmic suppression my rant had a tiny 34 views, when time was, probably pre-Convid, it may well have garnered tens of thousands.

Can you see just how the game is rigged?

Whether its the financial game, the judicial one or the social media one?

Each operates as some kind of Plato’s Cave, designed to entrap and keep imprisoned the mind of the collective.

A new feature of my RogueCast is the Great British Bell End – GBBE –  which will present one example/ candidate per week.

This week’s character is James Delingpole a flibbertigibbet establishment character, son and brother of Freemasons, a man whose role is to corral his listeners into a Limited Hangout that is fuelled by his penchant for rabbit holes of conspiratainment which only promote inaction and shallow thinking.

His brother, Dick, claims to be a Christian but this is, in the final analysis, palpably false as the religious cult of Freemasonry is, in fact, in worship of the false god, Jabalon – a thought form of the demiurge, that is most certainly not the True God.

In this way, James spins out falsities by the bucket-load and his defence of the dubious character Miri Bull-shit Finch, she of the empty rhetoric, in a private message to me more than qualifies him as this week’s nominee of GBBE in which I will highlight a character for the dubious honour of being a prize pillock of a deceiver.

I touch on Charlie Downes and the Generation Z, which is but a marketing description to characterise and target audiences for the targeting with advertising, who are compiled into general age groups – not a definitively accurate term but useful for the purposes of this discussion. Downes is another privately educated man who, in all probability, has never not had a pot to piss in.

As it stands, I am moving towards the view that Restore Britain is Controlled Opposition and it is noted that Rupert and his friends are pumping out empty platitude after platitude. In other words, and because they don’t go into the Law and Money issues, their rhetoric is empty. T

The seas of Great Yarmouth may not be populated with dinghy aliens but, at least as far a Rupert is concerned,  they do appear to be waters of fallacy, whose empty rhetoric washes up like flotsam and jetsam on its sandy beaches.

_______________________________

Thank you for your attention. I am still without a UK bank account and I am currently homeless, which means any and all donations are most helpful and truly appreciated at this time, so please feel free to chuck a few quid into the RogueMale coffers.

Therefore, if you’re able, please consider taking out a paid subscription on Substack or donate via the Rogue Male Coffee Pot.

Until the next time, all the very best to you and yours and, remember, Fortune truly Favours the Brave.

1

Ding Dong Bell, Delingpole’s Down the Well

The Shekels or the ‘money’ is a chimera that many chase. It is a falsity on the simple basis that the money of the realm is neither lawful or real and because it is, as a matter of unassailable fact, a credit system of financial control. It is
The One Ring to Control Them All.

As I have written about extensively, the licenced credit brokers are not actual banks. They are traders in securities, which they either buy, sell for profit or, in the case of the Great British Mortgage Swindle, unlawfully procure through the thousands of duplicitous conveyancing solicitors whose ignorance of the facts is as manifold as the earth’s oceans.

In an essay written last year, I posited that I am not in the business of making friends or followers across social media, whatever the form those limited hangouts take. My output is to be measured qualitatively and not quantitively.

A year on and nothing has changed: Facebook, X and You Tube continue to implement shadow banning on the accounts that I have. Any followers I have are small in number, with YT currently standing at 245, regardless of the quality of my output. X stands at 1812 followers and Facebook c. 2.9k.

The X feed does not show me the posts from those whom I follow and my posts are tweaked by the algorythms to not appear in the feeds of my 1.8k followers.

Why might this be the case? It began some 5 years ago when I was writing about the Scamdemic and, in common with many others who were doing the same, a blanket of censorship was draped over my content.

The numbers who subscribe to the Rogue Male site has remained static and, as it stands, those who visit my site has nosedived, with visitors now inumbered in the tens when it was in the hundreds per day, especially when I made a post.

It is frustrating and it is designed to be so as demoralisation is the name of the game in which silencing me is the intention, to the point where I simply give up.

One may posit that ‘surely this is paranoia, Michael?’

To which I would counter that it may simply be awareness of the fact that for the last 16 years I have been engaged in a steady campaign of exposing and explaining the Banking Con which necessarily includes the Great British Mortgage Swindle and the actual mechanics of a ‘money’ system that is entirely an illusion. Henry Ford famously said – and I’m paraphrasing here – that only one man in a million could work it out and if the population were to grasp the swindle of banking, then the proponents would be hanging from the lamposts.

Couple that with my exposure of the fraud at work in the Courts (HMCTS) – the calling out of the various actors who claim to be judges and the dark freemasonic sorcerers who serve the inversion of truth at all levels, then you may see just why I have been so suppressed. I am like the lone nutter who wanders round an empty field sounding off about the various BS artists and controlled opposition groups whose platforms dwarf mine by infinite degrees of magnitude. This Rogue Rant from yesterday, 21st August, 2025, serves to illustrate the point that Reform UK, Advance UK and Restore Britain are each led by ‘former’ investment bankers, who never go near the subject of credit creation.

That said, as regular readers and viewers will know, I simply enjoy writing and discoursing on the pertinent topics that come to my attention and, as you may expect, I have no intention of stopping.

Those who are approved evidently have no such problems and one example of a so-called popular writer and podcaster is the character known as James Delingpole.

His Delingpod  podcast continues to have a reach I can only dream of. Not that popularity can be used as the measure of a man or his work.

The son and brother of Freemasons, the expensively-educated Oxford graduate, who was once employed by the mainstream print media and was editor of Breibart, is something of a flibbertigibbit who enthusiastically plummets down a variety of rabbit holes, with all the gusto of a Jack Russell terrier, referring to himself as a red-pilled conspiracist who interviews a wide variety of guests.

Good for him, you might say but what if he is actually a state asset? After all, he is of the same cohort of graduates as Boris Johnson, David Cameron, George Gideon Osborne et al. He has stated that he was not recruited by Mi5 and groomed to be a national leader but I’m not buying it – the lady doth protest too much.

His long friendship with Lord Toby Daniel Moorsom Young, Baron Young of Acton – aka Toby Young – certainly rings a few bells. The pair of them had a weekly podcast, London Calling which, for a time, carried advertising for  the services of a Leicester mortgage broker who was sponsoring the ‘show’.

Of all the rabbit holes he goes down, like so many of his ilk, James Delingpole never goes near the issue of the One Ring of financial control that holds the vast majority of the multitude in its thrall.

This avoidance is sometimes referred to as the Third Rail:

“The third rail of a nation’s politics is a metaphor for any issue so controversial that it is “charged” and “untouchable” to the extent that any politician or public official who dares to broach the subject will invariably suffer politically. The metaphor comes from the high-voltage third rail in some electric railway systems.

Touching a third rail can result in electrocution, so usage of the metaphor in political situations relates to the risk of “political suicide” that a person would face by raising certain taboo subjects or having points of view that are either censored, shunned or considered highly controversial or offensive to advocate or even mention.” Source

Could it be that James has been placed to corral those who are awakening to the pernicious nature of the construct in which they find themselves to be trapped? Is he what Wyvern the Terrible calls,

“The Joe Rogan of British podcasting”?

I would assert that is exactly what he is and that his output manifestly amounts to nothing more than a Limited Hangout.

After all, is it not the case that those, like him, who have sizeable followings are tolerated by the controllers as long as they avoid the more salient issues like the law, hidden history and the credit system?

To be popular on social media and in the ‘alternative scene’ one has to accommodate and maintain the current audience but is that audience truly conscious or have they been suckered into a cul-de-sac of empty rhetoric that nullifies their followers into passivity?

Is an audience that is drawn to conspiratorial narratives and the ‘rabbit holes’ that James frequently refers to really any different from the rest of the populace? Does that audience not have a limited perception that undermines their claims to be ‘awake’?

Is the ‘alternative scene’ truly different from the mainstream one?

Take for instance the issue of vaccination. The mainstream promotes it and the alternative scene denounces it.

Although a minority may point it out, few seem to be ready to acknowledge that the very premise of vaccination is utter nonsense. That premise is rarely considered and thus we have the mud-slinging that is exchanged between the two opposing camps which goes nowhere, just as it is intended to do.

Delingpole’s jolly schtick is nothing more than an echo chamber, that occasionally mocks his followers. By way of example, in his interview with Richard D Hall last year, the latter made mention of the recurrence of the number Twenty-Two in  the referenced Manchester event, as well as how it features in other such psy-ops. This moment occurs in the 22nd minute of their dialogue. Did James edit it so that it appeared to be a coincidence, designed as a hint that the Freemasonic controllers are all-powerful and that their operations are thus works of genius?

The only interaction I have had with Mr Delingpole was when, last September, I published an essay on Rhetoric on the Substack platform, James shared it and reiterated my conclusion that Miri Finch’s article on the Richard D Hall court case was reliant on logical fallacies. Finch, of course, is someone who he has interviewd on a number of occasions and I would not trust her as far as I could throw her. The pair of them run round the rabbit runs like a pair of self-righteous bunnies.

Birds of a feather flock together – Finch and Delingpole – an echo chamber of empty rhetoric.

The curious thing was that shortly after the article was published and Delingpole had shared it, he then sent me a direct message, recanting his support of the piece, in which he glibly stated that Finch is “good”, that he would defend her honour and that I should stop giving her “shit”, otherwise he would be “very disappointed”.

Somewhat surprised at his volte face, I sent him this reply,

“Good morning, James and thank you for getting in touch.

Naturally, I will retract any post I have made that is inaccurate and, if necessary, issue an unreserved apology to the individual concerned.

Therefore, if you would be so kind, please inform Ms Finch that she has only to point out any errors in my reasoning and I will do just that.

However, please take note that I will not be moved by any fallacious appeals to emotion such as those contained in your rather bizarre direct message.

In fact, may I enquire as to what any of this has to do with you? Did you not appreciate the critique on Finch’s rhetoric to the point of sharing it?

In truth and honour, Michael”

The ensuing silence was deafening.

Looking back, I wonder what had motivated him to behave in such a way. The Bullfinch is fond of repeating her mantra that “If you know the name, they’re in the game.”

Unsurprisingly, she does not apply this tenet to James Delingpole, a man who is married to a member of the tiny hat family and who sent his son to Eton. Quite how, as a self-proclaimed alternative ‘truther’ he is able to fund his country manor and the school fees of his son is beyond my ken, unless, of course, he is indeed a salaried deep state operative who does not have to rely on donations and subscriptions.

It is also worth noting that he never goes anywhere near the subject of the ongoing invidious population replacement progrom that is being rolled out before our very eyes, even going so far as to state that the Southport murders were a false flag operation and that the Mohammedan gangs on our streets are state-sponsored actors.

Is all this a case of sour grapes? Not in the least. To reiterate: I am not here to gain praise or garner followers but I am allergic to bullshit and have a healthy suspicion of those who speak with plummy accents, lord it over others and ponce about like latter-day pied pipers.

My writings and discourses are to be assessed qualitatively – they stand or fall on the accuracy of the information and the reasoning contained therein and not the size of the audience. That, of course, means that I stand as the antithesis to each of the ex-investment bankers who front Reform UK, Restore Britain and Advance UK.  Posh accents invariably gloss over vaccuity and none of those ever goes near the subject of money/credit creation, its control and its supply:

Meanwhile, James’ love of the shekels continues – each ‘Delingpod’ episode is introduced with an advertisement for a company that deals in gold and silver and whilst there is no problem with that per se, it is interesting to note that his much-trumpeted burrowing down and through a variety of rabbit holes always avoids the gaping tunnel of the financial control system, the matter of Law and the various legal traps in which we find ourselves. Would such a venture threaten his income stream? I don’t know but it is an interesting question nevertheless.

One thing for sure is that Delingpole has never been short of a few bob, just like Farage, Lowe and Habib and, consequently, that could be the reason why none of them go near the issue of the fraud of banking and, indeed, why no so-called ‘influencer’/soc media bigwig or conspiracy enthusiast ever goes near the subject of how it’s created, where it comes from and who controls it.

Cue the silence as I drop another pebble into the well of their vaccuity… so it goes, so it goes….

_________________________________________

Thank you for your attention. I am still without a UK bank account and I am currently homeless, which means any and all donations are most helpful and truly appreciated at this time, so please feel free to chuck a few quid into the RogueMale coffers.

Therefore, if you’re able, please consider taking out a paid subscription on Substack or donate via the Rogue Male Coffee Pot.

Until the next time, all the very best to you and yours and, remember, Fortune truly Favours the Brave.

 

Addendum: Whilst I cannot vouch for the veracity of this short YT video, “Is James Delingpole Encoding Masonic Numerology Into His Show?“, it does touch on some of the issues that I have aired in this essay – namely that Delingpole edited the interview so it appeared that Richard D Hall started speaking on the recurrence of the number 22 at the 22nd minute mark and it also posits that James’ brother, Dick, is a Freemason, as was their father. Consequently, some may take the view that there’s no smoke without fire…

2

Faking it: broken Royal promises, the anti-christ and TGBMS.

How on earth did I come to this? An overview of a journey that began in Huddersfield and led to me taking on the One Ring That Controls it All. Six years on and the issues are still pertinent.

Part 1: The Royal Rejection of god by the queen and her men.

“No enactment of man can be considered law unless it conforms to the law of God.” Sir William Blackstone.

Recently, I’ve been considering the nature of my relation to god, particularly in regard to natural law and the truth or logos (as in the word of god). Last Saturday morning, I had a encounter with an elderly gentlemen who turned up at the door as a paid-up member of the cult of Jehovah (viz. a ‘Jehovah’s Witness’). I explained to him how I have never had any urge to belong to an organised religion, that, nevertheless, I had been christened and that I do believe, in a very practical sense, that Christ consciousness is the antidote to the evil that self-evidently dominates the world at this time.

One can stand in truth and light or one may choose the opposite, to lurk in the shadowy confines of state treachery, financial fraud, fake news and all that which stands in opposition to the truth.

To consciously stand under natural law and in the truth may be termed christ consciousness.

The fact that our world is contaminated by the lies and the frauds of those who speak them, as perpetrated by an inverted mainstream media, means it can be asserted that we are unavoidably bound by natural law to express the truth (the word of god – logos) in the face of myriad lies (the anti-christ: a state of being wherein one chooses to lie or cause harm to gain advantage over others).

It has long been my conviction that we are here to take action in the physical realms – ‘in this world but not of it’ – that this is a genuine spiritual journey through the material world and that anyone who is ignoring the facts of our enslavement or, in turn, uses any form of Kabbalistic Inversion to mislead or harm others (whether knowingly or otherwise) is, by way of his (in)actions, engaged in satanic practice. Thus, any action, whether it be in support of or straightforward compliance to the tyranny that exists all around us may be termed a manifestation of the anti-christ.

The foregoing is the gist of what I expressed to my doorstep visitor.

The witness’s response was to reach for his i-phone (I kid you not) and quote a couple of sections from the bible – one about Jesus’ authority over the world and the other, interestingly, on the temptation of Christ by the Devil. I feel compelled to say that I enjoyed my conversation with this old boy – his smile and the warmth in his blue eyes spoke of a connection that rose between us, no matter how fleetingly. It mattered not from whence each of us had reached our understandings, we were, in those moments – for want of a more appropriate expression – united in christ (consciousness). We had established a common ground  The encounter ended with us each musing over the distinct possibility that we are living in the ‘end times’: that it is the end of satan(ism). In that moment, we had individually and jointly, reached a level of trust: trust that the truth will out.

The queen and all her men.

By contrast to that which I trust in, I have a long held a deep mistrust of the British monarchy that has sat easily alongside my perception that their reign is fraudulent. For a number of well-founded reasons,  often instinctual, I have steered a course well-away from its tentacles.

Occasionally, however, I have come within its purview. The first example was when I, along with some 400 other junior-school pupils stood on New Hey Road, Oakes, near Huddersfield, to wave at the queen as she drove past en route to open Scammonden Dam and the M62 motorway, some 4 miles north-west of where we stood. It is fair to state I was non-plussed by the experience. Of course, this flag waving was not some natural childish upswell of support for the monarch: it had been organised by the school staff.

The next instance was when I joined the Scouts and swore an oath to God and the Queen:

The Scout Promise

 

“On my honour I promise that I will do my best—

To do my duty to God and the King* (or to God and my Country)

To help other people at all times and

To obey the Scout Law.”

 

*’queen’ in my instance.

 

To me, it was a promise that seemed (and still does) a good one to make, particularly for a young lad of a christian persuasion, as in my case. However, the inclusion of the queen jarred with me. I simply did not comprehend it. I had no sense of how or why this individual could be taken as a ‘ruler’ over others.

The royal wedding of 1981 was easily avoided by way of a cycling trip to Scarborough with 3 friends: the closest we came to it on the day was when we stopped off at a pub at the bottom of Sutton Bank for some refreshment and it was being broadcast on a television behind the bar.

Speaking of which, the obsequious nature of the media coverage of the sinister soap opera known a the monarchy has always been so nauseating to me that I would walk out of the room should it appear on the goggle box and I had no means of switching it off.

In 1997, the death of Diana released an outpouring of collectively-induced fake grieving that I also steered well-clear of. One strange outcome (or should that be ‘happy occurrence’?) of which was that all the roads were completely clear throughout the day on the  Sunday immediately following her demise,  which made my move, on that day, from Nottingham to Leicester a  hastle-free one.

On 30th March, 2002, one of the fake royals known ‘affectionately’  (as the sycophantic media would have it) as the ‘queen mother’ died. On 1st April, two days later, I was at a forgettable football game between Huddersfield Town and Oldham Athletic. However, to my great chagrin and disbelief, it was announced  that before the game kicked off there would be minute’s silence to mark her passing. Of the 14,343 spectators in the ground, I must have been just about the only who did not stand up when the moment came. It’s the unquestioning deference that I just don’t get, particularly when it happens  en-masse. Such collective doffing of one’s cap is an anachronism that may well be explained by the levels of media propaganda that the population is subjected to.

Naturally, I will be avoiding the latest wedding episode of the ‘royal’ Bread and Circus show, as scheduled for later this month.

In 2009, I renounced my citizenship of the UK, by way of Notice to the woman acting as the Queen, the nominal head of the ‘Crown’. In an accompanying missive, I took the opportunity to renounce my childhood allegiance to her as made in the scout ‘promise’ on the basis that she had failed in her moral obligations to the people to whom she had sworn an oath.

As far as I am concerned, even if the woman known as ‘Elizabeth Windsor’ did truly have a divine right to reign over us, she has forfeited that right by completely failing to fulfil the promise of her coronation oath to maintain God’s law for and on behalf of the people of these lands and, further, is entirely complicit in the act of treason by which the isles of Britain were assigned membership of the reich known as the European Union.

As the acclaimed William Blackstone observed:

“I PROCEED next to the duties, incumbent on the king by our constitution; in consideration of which duties his dignity and prerogative are established by the laws of the land: it being a maxim in the law, that protection and subjection are reciprocal.

 

[…] THE principal duty of the king is, to govern his people according to law. Nec regibus infinita aut libera potestas [kingly power is neither free nor unlimited], was the constitution of our German ancestors on the continent.*

 

And this is not only consonant to the principles of nature, of liberty, of reason, and of society, but has always been esteemed an express part of the common law of England, even when prerogative was at the highest.

 

“The king,” says Bracton, who wrote under Henry III, “ought not to be subject to man, but to God, and to the law; for the law makes the king. Let the king therefore render to the law, what the law has invested in him with regard to others; dominion, and power: for he is not truly king, where will and pleasure rules, and not the law.” source

 

And again:

 

“the king also has a superior, namely God, and also the law, by which he was made a king.”

  • It is to be noted that the Molmutine laws, being of more ancient origin than said Germanic laws, are those upon which the common law of the British Isles were established. More can be read here regarding the subject.

 

 

 

In this context, we turn to the terms of the contract she thereby established with the people through the Oath of Coronation, the terms of which were presented to her thus:

“The archbishop or bishop shall say, Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the people of this kingdom of England, and the dominions thereto belonging, according to the statutes in parliament agreed on, and the laws and customs of the same?

 

The king or queen shall say, I solemnly promise so to do.

 

“Archbishop or bishop. Will you to your power cause law and justice, in mercy, to be executed in all your judgments?

 

King or queen. I will.

 

“Archbishop of bishop. Will you to the utmost of your power maintain the laws of God, the true profession of the gospel, and the protestant reformed religion established by the law? And will you preserve unto the bishops and clergy of this realm, and to the churches committed to their charge, all such rights and privileges as by law do or shall appertain unto them, or any of them?

 

King or queen.  All this I promise to do.

 

“After this the king or queen, laying his or her hand upon the holy gospels, shall say, The things which I have here before promised I will perform and keep: so help me God. And then shall kiss the book.”

 

By swearing thus upon her oath, Elizabeth contractually agreed to the incontestable fact that god’s law, as delivered in and through the bible, stands as the supreme law of the lands known as Britain.

The question naturally arises: has she upheld the terms of her contract with the peoples of these lands?

Part 2: TGBMS: at the vanguard of the resistance to tyranny.

 

Of course, it naturally follows that the all-enveloping ‘Crown’ and ‘Her Majesty’s Courts’ are also up-to-their-necks in The Great British Mortgage Swindle. There is a scene in the documentary in which Remi (my former housemate and associate) and I are resisting a second criminal eviction (just 12 months after the theft of my home on 4th November, 2010) by Nottingham County Court bailiffs and the complicit Nottinghamshire Constabulary.

The warrant had, as a matter of fact, been settled by way of a cash payment, for which we had a signed receipt from the county court where the money was tendered. [see below]

The warrant upon which the queen’s men were reliant:

 

 

What the law states:

Under the County Court Act 1984 – Section 87 –

“Upon payment of the amount outstanding, the right to enforce a warrant of Possession is suspended.”

Note: whilst it has been correctly pointed out that there is a reference to an outstanding sum of £126,581.24, the intention was to nullify the warrant so that the eviction could not go ahead. Therefore, at least as far as the warrant was concerned, it was a valid attempt to void it, albeit an unsuccessful one.

The copper did not challenge it at the time. Looking back, we were under considerable pressure as we were facing a second unlawful eviction in 12 months and we reasoned it was worth a try, if only to expose the BS operation of the warrant, which, by law, should have been signed by a judge and clearly was not.

In a similar case that eventually ended up in the Crown Court, the judge there ordered that the valid warrant be produced, containing the judge’s signature. The County Court refused to provide it, which speaks volumes about the fraudulent nature of any and all possession warrants. So, at least as far as the warrant was concerned, the receipt did prove it was satisfied:

 

This crucial evidence was criminally ignored by those acting as constables each and every time it was presented to them.  At a certain point in the ensuing action (which lasted for 6 hours or so on that cold day of 07 November, 2011), Remi, seeing the vultures beginning to gather,  strides down the street, holding aloft his copy of the bible. Full of righteous indignation he declares,

“These people are criminals: they are breaking the law. See this here, the Queen swore an oath on this thing here, ok? This is the law.”

He is expressing the truth. It is a striking moment.

Part 3: The Broken Promises of the UK’s Judges and Constables

Firstly, the scene above graphically illustrates the extreme lengths to which the Crown’s agents  (in the forms of the Court, the judge, Richard Inglis, its Bailiffs and Nottinghamshire police) will go in the violent enforcement of a satisfied, albeit void, warrant of possession.

Secondly, it demonstrates the individual and collective breaches of the oaths sworn by the judge and the attendant constables and, hence, the fraudulent actions of those acting in those roles.

In my own case against the Bradford and Bingley, Richard Inglis, the then ‘senior judge’ or, more accurately, overlord of Nottingham County Court, repeatedly failed to apply the statutory law of mortgages, in clear breach of his oath of office which states:

“I, _________ , do swear by Almighty God that I will well and truly serve

our Sovereign Lady Queen Elizabeth the Second in the office of ________ ,

and I will do right to all manner of people after the laws and usages of

this realm, without fear or favour, affection or ill will. “

For the court to ignore the facts of the matter, as reasonably presented to the judge and then conspire with the bank, the bailiffs, locksmiths and police to steal the house, without any evidence of a lawful contract or consideration, is as clear a breach of this oath as can be imagined.

To throw people out on to the street, essentially over a fake debt, with no regard whatsoever for the evictees’ well-being is, self-evidently, a psychopathic action that stands in breach of natural law. To reiterate: any action that causes harm to others is satanic.

It is a top-down system of psychopathic tyranny that infects every level of public life and it flows directly from the cruel deception that is the monarchy. The police are one cog in this tyranny and they have been played.

Each constable swears an oath of allegiance to the queen, in which he promises to serve and protect the people, without fear or favour. Yet, as was the case here, by taking the side of the Court and its officers, and ignoring the first-hand evidence of the receipt for the settlement of the warrant, the constables of Nottinghamshire, jointly and severally, were demonstrably in breach of their oath of office:

“I do solemnly and sincerely declare and affirm that I will well and

truly serve the Queen in the office of constable, with fairness,

integrity, diligence and impartiality, upholding fundamental human

rights and according equal respect to all people; and that I will, to

the best of my power, cause the peace to be kept and preserved and

prevent all offences against people and property; and that while I

continue to hold the said office I will to the best of my skill and

knowledge discharge all the duties thereof faithfully according to

law.”

A constable from Nottinghamshire Police Force in breach of his oath:

MOD: “You may well fold your arms and stare into empty space because that’s the chasm you’re looking at. The sooner you guys wake up to what’s going on, the better. I’m asking you for some help here, man. I’m scared. Excuse me, I’m scared [taps PC on shoulder]. Can’t you help me?”
PC: “We’re here to protect.. “
MOD: “Right, well, they’re knocking my front door down, how’s that not a breach of the peace?”

Conclusion: “Kingly power is neither free nor unlimited.”

Swearing allegiance to a monarch who has, in turn, promised to uphold God’s law, necessarily means that the police too are beholden to natural law. This second eviction scene illustrates how the woman acting as ‘her majesty’  and the officers of ‘her Majesty’s Courts’  completely fail in their obligation to uphold natural law and the ancient laws of these lands (the common law). For Elizabeth, the woman, this breach is a direct inversion of her coronation oath, which included her promise, as nominal defender of the faith, to protect the God-given rights of the people:

“But, to obviate all doubts and difficulties concerning this matter, it is expressly declared by statute 12 & 13 W. III. c. 2. that

 

“the laws of England are the birthright of the people thereof; and all the kings and queens who shall ascend the throne of this realm ought to administer the government of the same according to the said laws; and all their officers and ministers ought to serve them respectively according to the same: and therefore all the laws and statutes of this realm, for securing the established religion, and the rights and liberties of the people thereof, and all other laws and statutes of the same now in force, are by his majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the lords spiritual and temporal and commons, and by authority of the same, ratified and confirmed accordingly.”

 

Source: Commentaries on the Laws of England (1765-1769) SIR WILLIAM BLACKSTONE BOOK 1, CHAPTER 6 ‘Of the King’s Duties’

Given the queen’s oath is sworn on the bible, which necessarily means the monarchy is contractually obliged to uphold the law of god, then what about the law on usury?

Ancient customs/law banned usury. As does the bible. Further, what of the double fraud that take place in The Great British Mortgage Swindle – the charging of compound interest on credit/money that was created out of thin air?

The bible is perfectly clear on this issue

Let us not forget that each and every so-called bank is a Rothschild-licenced money-changer (or conjuror) which operates under the fraudulent aegis of the ‘Crown’. The bank deceptively claims that one is a borrower and then adds compound interest on top of the fake loan, which necessitates. and this is a major plank in the perpetuation of TGBMS, that a mortgagor not only has to pay off the original principal (the value of the fictitious ‘loan’) but also the unlawful interest on top of that which usually results in him paying around three times  the amount of the false debt.

That is why it is a monstrous swindle whose enforcement amounts to nothing less than tyranny.

The antidote to Kabbalistic Inversion: Tell the Truth & Shame the Devil.

It is often said that the devil is in the detail. Therefore, given the monarch’s self-evident breach of contract, the inversion of all pubic oaths taken by officers of the courts and the police and the nature of The Great British Mortgage Swindle, it is reasonable to state that we are living under the yoke of tyranny.

This tyranny operates from the ‘top’ down and, to any one with the requisite levels of critical thinking, it amounts to nothing less than a breach of natural law. One may term it god’s law or one may term it the common law but, whichever phrase one chooses,  it is clear we are being subjected to a system of control that is an inversion of the truth. This inversion is abhorrent to anyone who knows what is right, what is just and what the truth is.

In this sense, the monarchy and its minions represent the anti-christ, from which one may extrapolate that it is satanic.

The antidote is to reveal its nefarious workings and call it what it is.

The antidote is to stop complying with it.

The antidote lies within each and every one of us who, by way of our god-given intelligence, to stand in the truth and take natural law as the only law we need follow.

Therefore,  although my boyhood oath of allegiance to the queen was rightly rescinded on account of her abject failure to uphold her Royal compact with the people, that which I swore to god and natural law stands as good.

Thus, God is my right: Dieu et mon droit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The individuals who continue to uphold the tyranny and the accompanying falsehoods that operate to the detriment of the people have, by way of their actions, chosen to follow the path of the anti-christ. Elizabeth ‘Windsor’ can no longer claim that motto as evidence of her divine right to reign.

May god help her and all those who act under her name.

♥——————————–º———————————♥

Thank you for your attention. I am still without a UK bank account and I am currently homeless, which means any and all donations are most helpful and truly appreciated at this time, so please feel free to chuck a few quid into the RogueMale coffers.

Therefore, if you’re able, please consider taking out a paid subscription on Substack or donate via the Rogue Male Coffee Pot.

Until the next time, all the very best to you and yours and, remember, Fortune truly Favours the Brave.

 

0

Acting the Goat

Although they are both ruminants, there exists a number of profound differences between sheep and goats.

The goat is a creature that has many associations, esoteric connotations and symbologies that have stood for thousands of years. A simple dictionary definition will suffice to illustrate this point:

goat | ɡōt | noun1 a hardy domesticated ruminant animal that has backward curving horns and (in the male) a beard.

It is kept for its milk and meat and is noted for its lively and frisky behavior.

Capra hircus, family Bovidae, descended from the wild bezoar.• a wild mammal related to the goat, such as the ibex, markhor, and tur. See also mountain goat.

• (the Goat) the zodiacal sign Capricorn or the constellation Capricornus.

2 a lecherous man.

3 US a scapegoat.

PHRASES get someone’s goat informal irritate someone: I’ve tried to get along with her, but sometimes she really gets my goat.

DERIVATIVES goatlike adjective ORIGIN Old English gāt ‘nanny goat’, of Germanic origin; related to Dutch geit and German Geiss, also to Latin haedus ‘kid’.

GOAT | ɡōt | abbreviation informal, mainly US (especially of a sports player) greatest of all time: excellent defensive play from the GOAT | no one can deny his GOAT status, but he can’t win forever | that movie was GOAT.

There are also numerous associations with the dark arts of Lucifarianism:

When I was a boy, my mother would occasionally disprove of my boisterous behaviour and tell me to,

“Stop acting the goat, Michael”

For the purposes of a broad societal comparison, it is clear to see that most people are firmly embedded in the collective flock, they act as one mind, not individuals and, in recent times, we have seen the introduction of expressions like the sheeple to describe how the desire to fit in results in them complying with criminal government diktats, fake authorities and all manner of general beliefs, which in the final analysis, prove to be simply untrue. The convid scamdemic and the mass compliance with the genocidal ‘vaccines’ is a classic example of the phenomenon. The Freemasonic Satan Mind-benders who seek to control humanity are acutely aware of this fact and, as we know, use it to their invidious advantage. Mind control, in other words, is easy when the target is firmly lost in the hive collective and has been mis-educated to the point of complete propagandisation.

There is, however, a minority of people who are staunchly individual: their eccentricity is demonstrable and they simply do not comply or go along with the fake authorities who try to corral them into accepting all manner of bogus agreements, information and criminal diktats.

Regular readers will know how intolerant I am of false accusations and I have previously noted just how those who make them are invariably accusing the other of just that which they are engaging in themselves.

This point can be illustrated in the matter of my good friend Dave’s challenge to the void mortgage that exists as a false charge over his property.

In Dave’s battle against a void mortgage with the Nationwide, he demonstrated, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that Mr Lavelle, the barrister representing said credit broker, was relying upon a forged affidavit in order to procure a void judgement in his client’s favour. The Judge agreed with Dave’s assertion and stated, on the record, that

“This is a criminal matter Mr XXXX.”

As this unfolded in the County Court, all Mr Lavelle could do was gaze into the void of his laptop’s black mirror and repeatedly mumble that

“This is an abuse of process”,

thereby inverting the truth as it was he that was manifestly engaging in an abuse of process, not Dave.

Yet, in the manner of a schizoid, said judge went on to issue a void order, pretending that the matter had not even been mentioned. This happened in Kingston Upon Hull County Court.

All of which features in the opening part of today’s ramble which then moves on to consider how the reality tunnels we inhabit may be those of a collective mindset whilst others are wholly unique to the individual. By way of illustration the walk next features a physical tunnel made of a hedge-row and which stands as a natural symbol of such. The walk then emerges onto a panoramic view of the rolling hills of Derbyshire.

As I continue, I note that Autumn is coming  and whilst in Oldmoor Woods, I mention the Moors of old and a fake African king, Kubala, who is currently residing in the woods near Jedburgh in the Scottish borders and preposterously claiming that his ancestors were once kings of the Scottish Highlands. Some may posit that he has Delusions of grandeur and it is to be noted that,

Autumn is coming and the King’s looking fat,

When Winter arrives, he’ll be as thin as a lat.

I then show the 14th Century flagstones of Strelley, a lunchtime encounter with a British Bell End before taking in the thousand year old All Saints Church.

The ramble continues with a brief encounter with a vintage 3-wheel motor vehicle, quite possibly a Morgan.

Finally, I touch on a delightful reintroduction I had at the Dew Drop Inn, Ilkeston  with Ian, Sarah and Amelia and an impromptu drinking session. (If you’re reading this, Sarah, then many thanks for your kindness and I look forward to our next meeting).

_______________________________________________

Thank you for your attention. I am still without a UK bank account and I am currently homeless, which means any and all donations are most helpful and truly appreciated at this time, so please feel free to chuck a few quid into the RogueMale coffers.

Therefore, if you’re able, please consider taking out a paid subscription on Substack or donate via the Rogue Male Coffee Pot.

Until the next time, all the very best to you and yours and, remember, Fortune truly Favours the Brave.

0

MONEY’S SECRETS

This was originally published in 2014 and was written for my old friend Jim’s son William. It remains as pertinent now as it was then and, as the reader will gather, it is presented as something that a teenager could understand. There is a free pdf included below, along with a series of links to articles I have written more recently. If you have any feedback and/or constructive criticism, please drop me a comment.

_________________________________________________________

2025 Preamble: Thank you for your attention. I am still without a UK bank account and I am currently homeless, which means any and all donations are most helpful and truly appreciated at this time, so please feel free to chuck a few quid into the RogueMale coffers.

Therefore, if you’re able, please consider taking out a paid subscription on Substack or donate via the Rogue Male Coffee Pot.

Until the next time, all the very best to you and yours and, remember, Fortune truly Favours the Brave.

_____________________________________________________________

WHAT EVERY ONE OVER 16 SHOULD KNOW ABOUT HOW BANKING CONTROLS THE PLANET & HOW ‘ADULTS’ ARE LYING TO THEM ON A DAILY BASIS

OR: Sound Advice for those who Choose Freedom over Slavery

Dedication

William is sixteen and the son of my friend. The last time we spoke, he was describing to me the frustrations he has with life ~ the fake ‘adults’, the lies of his (mis)education at a school/prison of over 1200 pupils and his struggle to find a way out of the web of deception which lies all around him. This is written for him and all who share his frustrations in a way that it is hoped will assist him.  So, Will, thank-you for providing this opportunity and please share it among those friends who you know have their bullshit detectors switched on, enjoy being told a secret and are able to spot when they are being taken for a mug.

BLINKERED CHILD IGNORANCEThis article contains information that no so-called ‘education’ system in Britain will provide and it is just the sort of knowledge any free thinker around the age of 16 and above should be interested in because it reveals exactly why and how they have been lied to, how their minds are manipulated and why they sense they are being untreated fairly and living in a glorified prison. Though it’s written with Will in mind,  the audience is all young people because the vast majority of the so-called ‘adults’ have bought the lie and are in so deep that they are like men drowning in quicksand, whereas young people remain more open and curious to life.

Older people turn away from the truth because it unsettles them due to the fact it is usually at odds with all that they (religiously) believe in and they become fearful that to explore it would somehow deprive them of the means by which they make money (for their masters) and provide sustenance for their families. With each turn, they getted sucked a little deeper into the swamp they are floundering in. Dependency often leads to subservience and, thus, they come to lick the hand of the Banking overlords which feeds them and live out fearful lives of quiet mediocrity.

Does this make them cowards?  Probably. Are they unusual in behaving this way? Sadly, no: the vast majority of humans will shy away from all that unsettles them and the routines of their lives. There are many ways to achieve this ~ via ‘legal’ drugs (prescribed by Doctors/Pharmacists and that supplied in the form of alcohol), by choosing willful ignorance (flatly rejecting any new information that comes their way and challenges that which they falsely hold to be true), by flat-lining their brains with television, by allowing religion and its teachers to hypnotise them by repetition of prayers and chants and by choosing/being forced to work such long hours that their minds never have the time to dwell on a subject ~ people will be busy doing anything which prevents them from having to contemplate the real nature of the lives they lead, the observances they have and the possibilities for further learning.

In short, they calcify to the point where they become like statues.  In the long term, they sacrifice their mental and physical health in order to avoid those issues that really matter.  One of the biggest issues is how they are living as unwitting slaves. That is not stated lightly ~ RM has been outside of his former work as a teacher in the (mis)education system for almost 5 years now and readily admits that he too was a cog in the machinery of statism.

And remember, Will,  if those around you can’t take a joke, then feck ’em.  It’s your life, your journey, your movie and as long as you don’t cause harm to others, you are free to do just what you like. But don’t forget that caveat: cause no harm and be true to your self. Shake off your fake chains: you are more powerful than you realise. But remember too, there are people out there who want to screw you over for their own private gain: such people are predatory and make no mistake, they do exist. They have many tried and tested methods of control; one is language and that, of course, should form the basis for any real advice someone could give you. In the words of Philip K. Dick:

The basic tool for the manipulation of reality is the manipulation of words. If you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use them.

It doesn’t take much to work out the truth of that statement: simply consider how you think, how you communicate, how you find out new things for yourself, how others communicate with you, the effect of certain words when applied in particular circumstances, how media, actors, presenters, anyone in a position of authority use words to control what they express to their audiences. Screen shot 2014-02-23 at 18.42.42

Language is, of course, one of the media by which we communicate ideas but it is also, for the individual, for thinking, for reasoning and expression.  It is  SPELLBINDING and those who practice it well are powerful, self-transforming and influential individuals. Combine WORDS with images, movies and symbols, and one has untold abilities to shape and influence others, for better or worse. However, for the purposes of this post, we are going to focus on the perhaps the most ingenious method of control there is: money.

The history of money, its creation and its controllers is what we may refer to as occulted knowledge: it has been occulted (hidden) to such an extent that very few people on this planet have a complete grasp of how it operates as a means of control over billions and how these control mechanisms are manipulated by a tiny handful of men for their own private gain. The following is a simple distillation of his understanding right now. This occulting of knowledge is only now apparent to him.  The information expressed herein is precisely that which was hidden to the RM’s older self. Therefore, it is offered up as substantive knowledge for those who need to know and will benefit from the knowledge. We all use it, we all believe in it but what exactly is this thing we call money and how is it created?

MONEY  ~ by which people can exchange comes in many forms: from shells to tally sticks, to gemstones, to precious metal to coins to animal horns to tokens and notes. Money can be anything that 2 or more people believe has  shared value.

USAGE ~ money is used the world over as a means of exchange, it captures the flow energy of the people and, like a resistor in a circuit board, it holds great power over the currency. [more on real currency, below]

CONTROL ~ by monopolising [the total control of] its creation, supply and demand, money is a highly effective method of controlling others. This control is by way of the governments who do not create money for the people but instead use the people as guarantees for loans (extensions of credit) from the Bankers who control it all.    The Birth Certificate (more below) is used as the basis for the promise (the security) to guarantee repayment of the loans taken out by the governments. The government then collects taxes to ‘pay off’ the fake debts to the Bankers. And all the while, the masses of people, languish in a trough of ignorance as to what it is, how it works and how it is used to extract their energy (currency) from them.

It is fair to state that the most successful controllers of money are those people who belong to the House of Rothschild. Screen shot 2014-02-24 at 11.19.10 Money is like a religion in so far as it binds, controls and requires its disciples to believe in its fake self. It requires that blind faith and allegiance to those high priests of banking who make up the rules and profit beyond what many would deem to be reasonable.

The knowledge of its history, creation and control is OCCULTED knowledge. In other words, it is kept hidden (secret) from all but a few who are allowed access to the money priests’ inner temple (where all the secrets are kept) in order that they may become MONEY’S DISCIPLES who spread the phony laws, control the people and hypnotise others into swallowing their nonsense.

Once upon a time, in a world of teenage nescience, the RM studied a subject called ‘Economics’, the essential point of which, time after time, boiled down to the control of the supply of and demand for goods and services. It was a dry old subject, taught by a dry old teacher in a dry old classroom and the lessons used to bore one’s pants off.

The demand for goods and services was controlled by this hidden group of ‘Economists’ who, our dry teacher reiterated, were working in the interests of everybody for the greater good.  In fact, they were, whether they realised it or not, ultimately working solely for the Bankers. This meant they controlled the flow of the money supply which in turn dampened or kindled demand for goods and services: if one had the money, then one could buy the goods and services; if one didn’t have any money then those goods and services could not be bought and demand would fall. At no point during the two years of study did RM’s teacher explain anything of the history of money.

Now why was that? Why was the information contained in this article NOT made available to those studying a subject of which it is probably the key component?

Money, money, money…

RM has heard it stated that the word itself is a form of mind-control, like hypnosis ~ Mon is from Mono & means one Ey is of Eye which is I (which is also Aye). The One Eye atop the dollar is the clue hidden in plain sight.

It is not difficult to see how money acts as a tool for mind control. Think about it: how many of those people you know are obsessed with it? They must have it, they must save it, they must be careful with it, they must not waste it, they must spend it wisely… There is a whole collection of attitudes and behaviours surrounding the One Eye, the MON-EY. Is money the ring that binds us all?

To RM’s older self,  money was a current that flowed in and out. In hard times, it was incumbent on him to tighten his belt and ride out the time of scarcity. When in plentiful supply, then it was incumbent upon him to spend. Boom to bust to boom to bust.  Again, one might well ask from whence did such notions (beliefs) come from?

I came into this world with fuck all and I’ve still got most of it left.

The pursuit of money was that which gripped the psyche of the adults around the RM as he was growing. When his father was on strike for three months at the back end of the 1970s, he had first hand experience of how a man was forced to go out and earn cash in hand to supplement his strike pay and use his earnings to put food on the table for his family.  If a man couldn’t make money, then life became much less certain. There is nothing like a family with empty stomachs to narrow the focus of the mind of a man… as well the controllers know.

The RM had a succession of jobs as a teenager.  The jobs taught him certain lessons and they paid him cash and that cash allowed him access to certain things. He was brought up to ‘pay his way through the world’ ~ ‘neither a borrower nor a lender be’ ~ and it was clear that this adage was sound advice that would see him through his life as smoothly as possible. Throughout his teenage years and his graduate days, the RM was little concerned with money: it came when he needed it and whilst there were times of hardship, it was a challenge for him to ‘tighten the purse strings’ and either go out and earn some or wait for it arrive by whatever means.

Some thirty years on and the RM is in a situation more poverty stricken (or rather, more cash-strapped) than he has ever been in. This was a direct consequence of him falling for one of the most treacherous swindles the money controllers use against the people: a mortgage [the Dead Pledge].

PREDATORS EXIST: BE ON YOUR GUARD.
PREDATORS EXIST: BE ON YOUR GUARD.

Money is used as a form of enslavement. Your enslavement begins with the Birth Certificate.  A slave is someone who gives over that which he has produced to another, his master. It matters not whether he is gives over 100% of his output or 10%,  he is a slave if he is not permitted to keep all he has earned and has to be giving over the produce of his labour (sweat equity) to a master. When his output is turned into a WAGE, paid in credits or in cash, then it is a piece of cake to control his energetic output and steal his produce.

The most common form of theft from a man is what is known as TAXATION. Given the very word, ‘GOVERNMENT’ means to CONTROL the MIND, it is logical to see it as a cadre of gangs who rob people of their produce by means of mind control techniques, the most powerful of which is the religion known as MONEY and, when that fails, by means of violent coercion.  To do this they have armies, police and various ‘officers’ who operate as revenue collectors. The simplest expression of this is Pay and Obey. Many of your parents will take the position that “that is how it is, we cannot do anything about it”. This is a lie and it is an attempt to pull you into the deceit by way of the fallacious appeal to common practice. Break the spell they are attempting to cast over you because the fact is the vast majority of adults know fuck all about just what money is and how it operates to keep them in a system of (not-so) hidden slavery. Like duped religious followers, they have a BLIND FAITH in money. It is a superstition rather like a belief in Santa Claus, the tooth fairy or Spiderman.

Many will understand immediately what it means to be a slave: every time a parent or adult asks you to do something which you are reluctant to do and then forces you to do it, they are treating you as a slave. Slavery is a crime against nature: you were, in fact, born with FREE WILL. This means at any given moment, you are free to make your own choice, irrespective of what an adult may claim.  Remember, though, you are subject to Natural Law ~ your free will comes with the responsibility not to cause harm to others.

The brainwashing system begins at school and the lengths the teachers go to in order to control you and train you up for a life of compliance demonstrates how powerful you are.

Ever wonder why the schools do so much REGISTERING?

Why lessons begin and end with a bell?

Why you are in a room full of others of your age?

Why you are all supposed to understand and be able to regurgitate the information you have been spoon fed in regular ‘tests’?

Ever wondered why some young people go to private fee-paying schools?

Do you ever wonder just why the fuck you are imprisoned in that building?

Why the hours drag by so slowly?

Ever wonder why everyone appears so stupid?

Why there are so many girls around?

Why some men behave in feminine ways?

Who or what is it that wants to control you at every turn?

How can you escape?

How can you exercise your free will?

THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE SCAM This is the tool of your enslavement.  Ask mum or dad for your copy and take a look at it. When the parent registers your birth, s/he is effectively making your person an agent of the state: your person is the slave, the government is your master and it is to your master that you pay your feudal tribute (taxes). This why the schools place so much emphasis on REGISTRATION and getting you to answer to the name ~ they are brainwashing you into accepting that the ALL CAPITALS name is who you are when, in fact, it is simply a FICTION, a noun which is used to entrap you in a Matrix of control.

This short film, MEET YOUR STRAWMAN, provides a good overview of this subject:

The easiest way to get your head around this is to contemplate the game of MONOPOLY in which the top hat, boot or car is the TOKEN you use to move around the board with. It is a fictional game in which one is subject to the rules and has to play with the MONEY (the notes) which is dispensed to the players by the bank.  The schools are brainwashing you into believing that YOU ARE the actual token, meaning that they want you to believe, just as they do, that YOU ARE the NAME. Each time you admit to being the name, they are casting a spell of control over you: it is a lie that you are expected to swallow (even your parents feed it you).

It takes some 15,000 hours of this brainwashing for most people to come out the other end having fallen completely for the scam.  They are training you like a master trains a puppy to answer to its name and to be obedient. When you are asked who you are, the answer is NEVER the NAME. The truth is that you are a wonderful individual, a perfect manifestation of the Universe, a unique fragment of all that is. Think of a tiny droplet of water in a vast ocean. It is connected to all the other water particles and together they make up the sea. Take one away and the sea is diminished, albeit microscopically. Think of a snow flake and how it is unique amongst all the billions of other flakes and how together they make a vast covering. You are utterly insignificant and yet, at the same time, completely unique and important to the rest of the ocean or the blanket of snow.

Above all, it is one’s individuality that places one smack bang in the middle of this great cosmic game of hide and seek.  Now you see me, now you don’t. Here is a thing to bear in mind at all times. You are not your NAME: you HAVE a name and that name is not you.  Just as you have a bag or a bike, you have a name. That name is as much you as the bag or bike is you. When you truly understand all of this, then you can begin to operate more freely. The only thing you have to remember is that with free will comes great power and if you use it to cause loss or harm to others, then you are misusing your life on earth and in breach of that one law. To harm others for personal gain would be as if a snow flake was intent upon dissolving away all those around it just so it could continue. This is exactly what those who control the planet through the hypnosis of Money are doing right now because they want to reduce the world’s population ~ and that includes all of us. Thing is that as in the end the snowflake itself would melt away too,  so those mentally ill controllers will bring about their own demise.

When your master is in fact mastered by someone else then you can begin to realise that the real slave drivers behind it all are those who control the creation and the supply of money. THE REALITY OF COURSE IS THAT YOU ARE THE MASTER OF YOURSELF. And no one has any right to claim otherwise providing you are causing no harm to any one. That is the essence of self government or living in accordance with your free will under Natural Law.

The alternative, the one that most fall for, is external government. This is essentially agreeing to be a slave. Government, is nothing less than as described here by the French anarchist, Proudhon. For Proudhon, anarchy is to be defined in opposition to the principle of governmentalism, which seeks to impose order through power. As he writes in his 1851 work, The General Idea of the Revolution in the Nineteenth Century:

To be governed is to be watched over, inspected, spied on, directed, legislated at, regulated, docketed, indoctrinated, preached at, controlled, assessed, weighed, censored, ordered about, by men who have neither the right, nor the knowledge, nor the virtue. …

To be governed is to be at every operation, at every transaction, noted, registered, enrolled, taxed, stamped, measured, numbered, assessed, licensed, authorized, admonished, forbidden, reformed, corrected, punished.

It is, under the pretext of public utility, and in the name of the general interest, to be placed under contribution, trained, ransomed, exploited, monopolized, extorted, squeezed, mystified, robbed; then, at the slightest resistance, the first word of complaint, to be repressed, fined, despised, harassed, tracked, abused, clubbed, disarmed, choked, imprisoned, judged, condemned, shot, deported, sacrificed, sold, betrayed; and, to crown all, mocked, ridiculed, outraged, dishonoured.

That is government; that is its justice; that is its morality.

And that, Will, is precisely my first-hand experience of all that government represents. In the simplest of terms, we are governed at arms length by the BANKERS who control the GOVERNMENTS by controlling the creation, demand and supply of money and lend to those same governments to fund wars, genocidal campaigns against the people and all other nefarious activitiess of the military industrial complex.

When the governed get ‘out of hand’ the jackboot of the police (a militarised force of ‘legal’ control) comes down on them. As the holder of the BC, you are destined to become an EMPLOYEE of the Bankers, as is everyone else. This employee status is confirmed by the NATIONAL INSURANCE NUMBER which you are given at 16. Its basis is the BC.  Another entrapment is the Driving Licence.

Both the NI and DL stand as proof of your status as a slave (aka ‘government employee for the banksters). Those who carry out the business of the bankers are handsomely rewarded for their ‘work’ ~ economists, propagandists, advertisers, film makers, psychiatrists, drug manufacturers (whether legal or otherwise, it matters not, if they are all using the money), lawyers, academics and professional performers (sports and other ‘amusements’) are all playing the game and acting as agents of control. They do not rock the boat or bite the hand that feeds them. And this acquiesence to the lie of government allows it to continue.

The thing to remember is that in order to keep the people tricked and playing the game, the Bankers require that the people remain nescient (unaware) of what is going on.  To break free of their mind games, one has to understand just what those games are and how they work on the human mind. At this point, let me direct you to this short film by LARKEN ROSE called THE JONES PLANTATION. As we observed earlier, when a man’s labour (his physical creation/making of goods and services) is taken by another, then he is, whether he cares to see it that way or not, a SLAVE.  This video explains it very clearly in only a few moments and shows how cunning men can control many people.

When you feel imprisoned Will, it is because there is part of you that sees you are on a giant plantation ~ if it feels like you are trapped, weighed heavy by those who would control you (whether parents or teachers) then that is because that same part of you that is and always will be free is dissatisfied because it knows that no man has the right to control another man. This is not to say that you do not have the right to defend yourself against those who would seek to harm you:  you do.

A bully will retreat when one stands up to him and sometimes, for purposes of self-defence, that may necessitate a punch on his nose or some other act of force to make him back off. They always do because, inside, they have been damaged and they are weak, a weakness they try and hide by playing the role of the bully. If this was not the case,  and he had not been bullied himself, then the bully would not be behaving as he is.

If you feel that school is a prison, then that is because it is. If you feel that there is nothing you can do about it, then that is because you have been brainwashed like a dog into obeying his master, no matter what that master does to him. You have been conditioned. But there is no need to feel sorry for yourself ~ self pity is of no benefit to you for in this situation you have to become your own hero and begin the process of setting yourself free.

Free from all forms of external governance/control is to be SOVEREIGN [from Old French soverain, based on Latin super ‘above.’ The change in the ending was due to association with reign . a sovereign state: independent, autonomous, self-governing, self-determining; nonaligned, free.. REIN is from Old French reignier ‘to reign,’ reigne ‘kingdom,’ from Latin regnum, related to rex, reg- ‘king.’] A sovereign, therefore, is one above a ruler.  And that is your natural state of being.

Ultimately, the real CURRENCY is KNOWLEDGE. One born with a fully functioning brain has the innate power of REASON. When you put into action that which you have learned, then that is WISDOM.

The TRIVIUM is a guaranteed method of freeing your mind from all the bullshit it has been drenched in and under.

TRIVIUM means THREE WAY(s):  these are

KNOWLEDGE

REASON (UNDERSTANDING) and

WISDOM

There are very few people out there who are teachers in the truest sense of the word. A true teacher provides you with the tools for learning and these are the means by which you can find your way out of the dark cave into which others have attempted to imprison you.

Education is from Educare which means to lead out (of the darkness).  A true teacher will assist you by educating you in the true sense:  he will encourage you to find out that which you need to know, how to apply your powers of reason to work out how and why it is so and then show you, by example, how to USE the knowledge and understanding in the REAL world (wisdom).

I mentioned the fact that you are contained within a herd of others who are of similar age to yourself. This is no mistake; in fact, it is a well-established method of control. Previously, your ancestors would have paid for each child to go to a school which was the opposite to that in which you find yourself. The emphasis would have been on how to think and how to apply that which you learned to your life and your art. There would be one classroom. All the children would be of different ages ~ say from 7 to 14. The older children would teach the younger ones that which they learnt and, in so doing, would have deepened their own understanding of the way we each learn.

There was none of this group-thinking that you are being subjected to each day in the institute of your learned-slavery. Those ancestors learnt the importance of self-reliance. The autodidact is one who learns for himself. The more curiosity we have, the more we find out for ourselves and the less we depend on others to define our thoughts and realities. One is a unique fragment of everything.

There is no other me, no other ‘you’ ~ all that exists is the I, the 1, the Eye. Anyone who uses expressions like ‘We are all in this together’, ‘Where would we be if every one took that attitude?’, ‘That’s just the way things are’ and ‘This is for the good of everyone’ is LYING to you.

Think about it. In whose interests would it be for any of us to believe those statements are true? The schools and those fake teachers in them are feeding you lies, disinformation and distortions on a daily basis. They control you by trickery and fear. They force cruel and unjust punishments on you if you so much as speak out or attempt to do things differently. They are very afraid ~ afraid for their jobs, their bills, afraid to speak out the truth, they feed young people all kinds of fake knowledge which is often forgotten immediately, such is its irrelevance to you and your life. For six hours a day you are imprisoned in a phony concentration camp, a jail for your mind.

There is much to digest here, so we will draw it to a close. The key point to remember is that when the individual combines his intuition (that which is heartfelt) with his ability to think for himself, he will become a force in the world.  This is his natural state and the controllers know it. Thus, all power lies in the individual to be whatever he chooses to be which means to walk his walk and be his own man.

That is the aim ~ be yourself.

Shepherd&AwakeSheep

Step away from the herd for it clouds you in group speak and confines you in ‘acceptable’ behaviours that amount to a creative straightjacket. Keep smiling at those who would control your will, Will, secure in the understanding that nothing they can do can touch your true self.

Oh, and failing that, ignore the feckers ~ it is very deflating for them when their empty blusterings fail from non-acceptance.

PDF DOWNLOAD: A PAMPHLET- MONEY’S SECRETS | RogueMale

Bibliography/videography & Other Links for Consideration

1. A article on the Tally Stick usage in Britain up to less than 200 years ago.

2. Wikipedia on Tally Sticks.

3. Let’s talk about money

4. Money – The One Ring to Control it All

5. Money – the most pernicious religion.

6. Episode 62: There is No Money in a Credit system

7. Centralised Digital Currencies are a Tyrannical Trap

 

 

1

Thought for the day: what is the true nature of woman?

 

I have, for a long while now, been pondering just what it is in the psyche of an individual that leads them to seek positions of authority over others. Whilst this essay is from 2017 and was written shortly after the arrival into this world of my daughter, the questions it asks remain as pertinent now as then especially in the light of the various miscreant females who inhabit the criminal UK government in 2025.

The nature of the male is, of course, outgoing. He seeks to understand the world around and outside himself, by way of observation and experience. His dna/biological imperative compels him to be this way and it thus follows that his natural tendency is to seek and implement solutions to the issues which confront him.

By contrast, the female is naturally more inwardly orientated: her emotional life and domestic existence is that to which she is more naturally inclined. Her dna/biological imperative compels her to be nurturing and focused on the home. However, it is also correct to state that, in her true nature, she is more disposed to working in a collective than the male. Compromise is what she seeks at every juncture and, as history demonstrates, this invariably results in decisions that are ‘wishy-washy’; which is a consequence of this.

Compromise may be reasonably defined as a faux solution that leaves everyone dissatisfied.

It is thus easy to understand how men may seek public power but somewhat harder to grasp why women might seek it.

The reader is invited to note, of course, that one is expressing generalisations here for history shows us that some women may well have had the wisdom necessary to operate in positions of authority over others. However, such women are rare.

In the light of which, here are a dozen questions to consider:

1.What kind of woman seeks political, economic, social or any other form of public power?

2. Is it a mere coincidence that the two extremist politicians, Theresa May and Angela Merkel are both childless women?

3. Why would a woman seek to work as a police constable or as a soldier?

Why would a woman want to be cop? Are women naturally inclined towards violence or is this image an aberration?

4.Given the fact men are physically stronger than women, how effective are women who work as firefighters? What are the limits on their ability to carry out the work?

5. Is it a surprise that Cressida Dick, the Commissioner of London’s Metropolitan Police is a childless Oxbridge-educated lesbian?

6. Why are there very few women who wish to work as engineers or scientists?

7. If the law is about reason above emotion, then how successfully can women operate in courts of law as judges, solicitors or barristers?

8. Is it only ‘natural’ that women should seek positions of power or is it a perversion of nature, one that has been engineered by feminism, that most destructive element of Cultural Marxism?

9. Given that enfranchisement is, as a matter of fact, the incorporation of the name as a corporate entity and not about giving people the opportunity to have any real influence on the puppet show known as politics, was this really a victory for the suffragettes? Or, was it a victory for the deep state, that could now include them in its deceptive registration system as chattels of the system?

10. Are women more naturally prone to collectivist thinking than men?

11. When and where is a woman at her happiest?

12. Are women more naturally prone to drama, and necessarily so, given the act of giving birth is one of the most dramatic events possible?

Do you remember the time when the then Tory government had to enter a pact with the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) led by Theresa May and Arlene Foster respectively? With the handbags off the table, a one billion quid deal settled it. Lovely work, sistas!

Whatever the reaction of the reader, the fact remains that social engineering exists and collectivisation is more likely to appeal to the nature of women than men. Male, or female we have been had. The transhumanist agenda, just like feminism before it, is the latest manifestation of this social engineering, and, like all of it, is as much an attack on the nature of the female as it is on the male.

_______________________________________________

Thank you for your attention. I am still without a UK bank account and I am currently homeless, which means any and all donations are most helpful and truly appreciated at this time, so please feel free to chuck a few quid into the RogueMale coffers.

Therefore, if you’re able, please consider taking out a paid subscription on Substack or donate via the Rogue Male Coffee Pot.

Until the next time, all the very best to you and yours and, remember, Fortune truly Favours the Brave.

Rogue Male YouTube Channel

Rogue Male on X

Further reading –

  1. The Bernician on abortion,
  2. Rogue Male on Feminism: the disease masquerading as the cure.
  3. Do we have a problem with women in public life?

 

7

British Lions Awaken

All the signs are that the Lions of the Isles of Britain are no longer Slumbering.

A Rogue Discourse on how the peoples of the Isles of Britain are finally waking like lions from slumber as they come to the realisation that their children, culture and deep-set morality are under attack from an engineered Alien invasion.

The antidote to the collectivisation attempts of the Freemasonic Mind Benders and their puppet traitors is and always has been the individual. We each travel throigh this realm, through a infinite number of unique reality tunnels. This can be illustrated by the fact that a number of witnesses to a car crash will, invariably, notice different details and, thus, provide highly individual accounts of what happened. We are moving within circles of individuality which, as in a Venn Diagram, intersect at various points but each journey is unique to the man or woman who is in this world, but not of it.

However, there exists a resonance that brings those individuals together from time to time. That time is upon us now and increasing numbers are waking up to the current and persistent threat to all that they hold valuable, especially the safety of our women and children. This like-mindness may be illustrated in the volume of ordinary people taking to the streets to voice their non-compliance with the unfettered numbers of illegal aliens who are flooding into our towns and cities and threatenng the well-being of those communities.

When the good folks of places like the sleepy market town of Nuneaton take to the streeets after the rape of a young girl, we know that the game is afoot:

It does appear that the slumbering British Lions have awoken in huge numbers and, like the release of the genie from the lamp, they are not going back until Britain has been restored.

None of these good people are ‘right wing’, ‘racist’ or ‘anti-refugee’. Rather, they are they are interested only in the facts and the truth of the situation that has been forced upon them by the treacherous traitors who are owned and paid for by the fraulent international financiers, the WEF, George Soros Foundation,  Davos etc to implement a Great Replacement of the indigenous European by way of the infamous Kalergi Plan:

The antidote to all forms of tyranny lies with the individual, the one who applies his critical thinking, his own morality and the one who knows that life is an entirely individual journey. In essence, he is the one who has not placed any man-made authority between himself, as a sovereign being, and his maker (God, or the Creator).

The slumberiing lions are thus awakening in their hundreds of thousands, largely as a consequence of the alien invasion of their homelands, the place of theirs (and their ancestral) nativity. These men are literally remembering who they are.

This is an inevitable consequence of the forces that are attempting to corral him into the collectivist trap of digital currencies and I.D.

By comparison, the various accolytes, arse-lickers and servants of the demiurge have sold their souls in return for material rewards. This includes any and all politicians, financiers and deep state operatives. In a perceived reality, all is of the mind, which necessarily means that the material construct is false.

It is also crucial to note that all of it relies on our agreement, our contractual acceptance of the diktats and willingness to comply. All of which explains the numerous methods that are deployed to brainwash us and engineer our consent.

As a sovereign individual, there is nothing that can be done to you without your acquiesence.

The Freemasonic sorcerers have souled-out to the demiurge. That means that they are the most imprisoned and compromised of all humanity – they may have the outward trappings of success but they exist like budgies in a cage, albeit one with golden bars and a diamond encrusted perch.

Until the next time, stay sovereign and realise your individuality is the most precious of all your qualities.

_____________________________

Thank you for your attention. I am still without a UK bank account and I am currently homeless, which means any and all donations are most helpful and truly appreciated at this time, so please feel free to chuck a few quid into the RogueMale coffers.

Therefore, if you’re able, please consider taking out a paid subscription on Substack or donate via the Rogue Male Coffee Pot.

Until the next time,  all the very best to you and yours and, remember, Fortune truly Favours the Brave.

Rogue Male YouTube Channel

Rogue Male on X

0

Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Baskerville 2 by Anders Noren.

Up ↑