Sovereign Being Under Natural Law. Educator. Anarchist. Occasional podcaster. Co-producer & protagonist in the film, The Great British Mortgage Swindle. Founding Trustee of Universal Community Trust. Lives in Bernicia & Deira, one of the Stolen Ancestral Lands of Northern Britain.
Across the lands of Europe and the isles of Britain, the people are increasingly aware of just how corrupt their ‘governments’ are. For instance, the Gilet Jaune movement in France is now in its 23rd week and shows no sign of relenting. Some might well argue a revolution is required. But, what of a peaceful renaissance that takes the power back into the hands of the people, where it truly belongs?
The much-despised political class, wherever they may sit – Brussels, Westminster or on local councils – continues to demonstrate just how out of touch it is with the reality of life for those whom they are falsely claiming to serve. A fact which can be easily seen with the Brexit pantomime, as being acted out on the ‘great’ stages of Westminster, Brussels and Berlin.
Whilst it seems unlikely that the French people’s mass action will be repeated in a similar form across these shores, growing awareness of #TGBMS has the potential to galvanise a slumbering populace towards a renaissance. This would represent a resurgence of power and transfer of wealth into the hands of the people on a massive scale. One that has not been seen before.
Banksters – our common enemy.
Quite how and why people falsely believe that ‘gov’ is there to help, serve and protect them is something I have written about on numerous occasions. Once one examines the facts, it does not take much to work out who is handling the politicians. As touched on by Michael O’Bernicia in the Renegade Inc interview, there is an ongoing criminal investigation into the allegation that all politicians are being financially rewarded by the Lloyds Group for not going into the subject of banking fraud. Needless to say, this includes the institutionalised mortgage fraud as laid out in the film, ‘The Great British Mortgage Swindle‘. The greed and treasonous self-interest of those politicians who evidently believe they are superior to their constituents will be their undoing.
There are countless other examples I could list but, for the purposes of this piece, I will focus on the one issue that unites us all – the ultimate control mechanism known as banking. Not one of those elected public servants is ever going to deal with the salient issue of the financial system and how it works towards enslaving mankind. The reason why is simple: they are only motivated by self-interest.
Meanwhile, the frustrations of the people continue to mount – and it is a justifiable anger that is directly related to the arrogance and disdain of said political class. Many will take to the streets, others will chant slogans and some may even join in exulting those who purport to be their leaders but who, in reality, are merely actors in the old game of ‘Controlled Opposition’ whereby the followers are corralled into a ‘limited hangout’ that allows them to vent their spleen but, ultimately, goes nowhere.
Following the Money.
The effects of the 2008 bank crash and resultant bail outs of the banks continue to felt by the people of these isles.The mortgage industry is valued at £1.3 trillion. When the money is created out of thin air, there can be no such thing as bank ‘loans’ , yet millions of people are paying billions each month to service these fake debts. It is, quite simply, fraud on an industrial scale and it affects us all.
The Great British Mortgage Swindle is a no-holds-barred documentary that focuses on this very issue. Featuring dramatic footage of unlawful evictions, hard-hitting facts about ‘money’ and its creation as well as actual court cases, it is a film that opens up the key issue of our time: the fraud of the bankers.
Perhaps, above all else, however, the film challenges the viewer to ask the question, what can I do about it?
A Renaissance?
In the recent interview with Renegade Inc (below), the host, Ross Ashcroft, suggests that freedom from mortgage slavery would result in a renaissance on the basis it would represent an unprecedented transfer of wealth and power to the people from the tiny elite. This intimate ruling kleptocracy is controlled and personified by the machinations of the House of Rothschild. He is right to state that the only ‘losses’ would be corporate. What will it take to bring about this renaissance?
Taking Action
In order to affect a renaissance, it is humbly suggested that what is required is for the ‘mortgagors’ of the British isles to take action and have their void charges removed from the land register.
This is course of action is outlined in the film and which can be read in full in this article, The People v The Banks: Representative Actions To End Mortgage Fraud. Readers are encouraged to sign up for the newsletters at the link therein. This would represent an action that circumvents the rigged political system and puts the power back where it truly belongs: in the hands of the people.
For further information and an opportunity to meet and get organised with fellow like-minded souls in your town or city, please book a seat at one of the nationwide screenings of TGBMS that is taking place next month.
TGBMS is predicated on an insidious fraud involving the very homes we live in. It is obvious that man needs shelter and that, particularly in northern climes, his shelter has to be substantial in order for him to survive the vicissitudes of the seasons.
It is also self-evident that a criminal financial system, fuelled by greed and lust for power, that takes control of that need via fraudulent practices which bleed the individual of his earnings is parasitical in the extreme and intolerable to anyone with a modicum of intelligence. Such a system amounts to financial enslavement and, here in the isles of Britain, it matters not whether one’s home is a flat, a terraced house, a semi-detached villa, a farm or a mansion, for whichever milieu of ‘society’ one is in, the banksters have been screwing you over.
This unconscionable state of affairs is never referenced by the puppets of parliament or the mealy mouthed mainstream media for they are each, one way or another, compromised by said by banksters.
To wage a war against it, as a small but notable group of mavericks has done, may appear to some to be an exercise in futility but that is to underestimate the power that the people have.
It is now 9 years since Michael O’Bernicia and myself began to chronicle the events of our uncovering of the stranglehold that is TGBMS – a long time for sure, and longer than we each envisaged. Battles have been won and lost on the way but the war has raged on to the point where it is now – the revelation is coming and all those self-serving barristers, judges, bankers, clerks, bailiffs and police officers who have sided against the people would do well to take heed of that fact:
“For we brought nothing into the world, and we cannot take anything out of the world. But if we have food and clothing, with these we will be content. But those who desire to be rich fall into temptation, into a snare, into many senseless and harmful desires that plunge people into ruin and destruction. For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evils. It is through this craving that some have wandered away from the faith and pierced themselves with many pangs” Timothy 6:7-10
Remi: “These people are criminals: they are breaking the law. See this here [hold aloft bible] , the Queen swore an oath on this thing here, ok? This is the law.”
In any event, and in response to the enquiries about its British release, we, the producers of TGBMS, ask all supporters and/or those who have purchased tickets to bear with us. A series of issues – both technical and legal – have had to be addressed in order that everything is as it should be. Happily, those issues have been resolved and we expect to make an announcement within the next week or so about its cinematic and on-line release.
Whilst more will be revealed nearer the time, we can confidently state that all who view the film are in for a quite a ride – the like of which they will never previously have had. TGBMS is the epic chronicle of 9 years’ worth of experiences of those on the front line in the civil war with the banks. We are almost there, folks, so thank you for your patience and support.
Finally, please also note that every one who has purchased tickets will be able to use those tickets to go to any screening in the country, subject to availability.
The narrative requires us to believe that a double agent, Sergei Skripal, ‘previously’ employed by MI6, who was jailed in 2006 for treason against the Russian state, released in 2010 and came to settle in Britain, is subject to a clumsy assassination attempt by his former government. This attempt was made via use of a ‘nerve gas’ which, it is alleged, was produced by Russian laboratories and goes by the name, ‘Novichok’.
Yet, even the very existence of said chemical weapon is doubtful:
“As recently as 2016 Dr Robin Black, Head of the Detection Laboratory at the UK’s only chemical weapons facility at Porton Down, a former colleague of Dr David Kelly, published in an extremely prestigious scientific journal that the evidence for the existence of Novichoks was scant and their composition unknown.
In recent years, there has been much speculation that a fourth generation of nerve agents, ‘Novichoks’ (newcomer), was developed in Russia, beginning in the 1970s as part of the ‘Foliant’ programme, with the aim of finding agents that would compromise defensive countermeasures. Information on these compounds has been sparse in the public domain, mostly originating from a dissident Russian military chemist, Vil Mirzayanov. No independent confirmation of the structures or the properties of such compounds has been published.
Source: Robin Black. (2016) Development, Historical Use and Properties of Chemical Warfare Agents. Royal Society of Chemistry. LINK
There is also this fact to consider:
So, what does it add up to? Cui Bono?
Could it be an attempt to demonise Russia and Putin? A pretext for conflict, a third world war as laid out by Albert Pike?
“Make no mistake, the poisoning of Sergei Skripal is part of an on-going and long-running psy war between Russia and the West, whoever carried out this attack had the intent of blackening Russia’s image in the minds of the British people. However, do you think Russia’s psywar guys give a toss about their image among the British and western sheeple or about “Russophobia” in those markets?
Fear and talk in the said markets about how Russian psywar guys are manipulating politics and media in the west (which they are) is GOOD for the Russian psywar effort, not BAD. Why? Because it implies to western populations that western rulers are WEAK, unable to control what goes on in western countries. That is really awful for morale. This is all in Psychological Warfare 101.
In short, the more bleating there is in Britain and the West about Russian manipulation of politics and media in those countries, the more the Russian psy war guys celebrate.”
“At the end of the day, the people who benefit from this crass and obvious attempt to ratchet up the tension between Russia and the West and to poison the minds of the British people against Russia is all too clear – it is the Zionist criminals who control Israel and the US.
Why is an even more obvious answer, they are pushing the world ever closer to World War 3 and poisoning a former Russian spy on the streets of Britain is their way of sowing in the minds of the British sheeple the notion that the Russians, and particularly Putin, are both belligerent and reckless enough to disregard international law and justice, to ignore British sovereignty and carry out a brutal murder on the streets of a quiet English town.
The message they wish to inculcate is one of fear and loathing of the big, bad Russian bear, a clear psy op to prepare the British sheeple for the upcoming war with Russia.”
There is also the issue of evidence. Where is the proof that the alleged attack actually happened? Theresa May certainly hasn’t provided it. Assuming it did happen, which is a massive assumption, then why would such a method be used if the Russians genuinely wanted Skripal dead? Why bother to leave a ‘calling card’? There are easier ways to assassinate someone rather than deploy the strategy as is being claimed. How could the Russians possibly benefit from such an action?
All of which suggests it is a false narrative that has been propounded by one of the security agencies, possibly with the involvement of Mossad.
The claim that Russia is behind it is further undermined by the absence of any evidence that a sarin gas was used. If it had been, then how could this occur?
Conclusion? It’s a blatant false flag. The entire narrative is not backed by any evidence. It is scripted, a piece of theatre designed to inculcate fear of the ‘Russian bear’ in the people. Will it work? It is hard to see how it could possibly be successful in the face of the wealth of critical thinking that has been unleashed regarding the myriad holes in the official narrative. Thus, it is a ‘story’, a false narrative with its own bogey man that will only work on the dumbed down, unquestioning, hive mind. Flimsy in the extreme.
“It’s a grand international provocation. […] First, they launch an insane propaganda campaign then they seal the data. Then, the courts make a decision but nobody knows what (it is) … because all those things are classified. Why are they so classified that we can’t even discuss them? Shocking.” Maria Zakharova
“Lies are piling on top of lies. As in all religions, the more absurd the pseudo-reality is, the more brutal and extreme are the methods used to uphold it. The more laughable the fabrications are, the more powerful the techniques used to suppress the truth are.
Today, hundreds of thousands of ‘academics’, teachers, journalists, artists, psychologists and other highly paid professionals, in all parts of the world, are employed by the Empire, for two goals only – to glorify the Western narrative and to discredit all that is standing in its way; daring to challenge it.
Russia is the most hated adversary of the West, with China, Russia’s close ally being near second.
The propaganda war unleashed by the West is so insane, so intense, that even some of the European and North American citizens are beginning to question tales coming from Washington, London and elsewhere.
Wherever one turns, there is a tremendous medley of lies, of semi-lies, half-truths; a complex and unnavigable swamp of conspiracy theories. Russia is being attacked for interfering in U.S. domestic affairs, for defending Syria, for standing by defenseless and intimidated nations, for having its own powerful media, for doping its athletes, for still being Communist, for not being socialist anymore;in brief: for everything imaginable and unimaginable.” Andre Vltchek, SOURCE
Any one who unquestioningly swallows the narrative, as delivered by Theresa May, has fallen for a clumsily-planned psychological operation and is being played for a fool. The majority of the unquestioning people are being treated with the same levels of stupidity that are manifest in the behaviour and arrogant ignorance of the self-serving poli-puppets who, in some ways, are a mirror of the same in the general population. If any one politician could be labelled as being not in his right mind, then surely Boris Johnson would be a contender:
Speaking during a visit to a west London military museum with the Polish foreign minister, Johnson said the UK’s “quarrel is with Putin’s Kremlin”.
“We think it overwhelmingly likely that it was his decision to direct the use of a nerve agent on the streets of the UK, on the streets of Europe, for the first time since the Second World War,” he said.
This is the kind of language used by Tony Blair to justify the beginning of the genocide in Iraq, in 2003.
Not without some justification, Dr Paul Craig Roberts argues that the western governments do not give a fig about international law, a position which he claims the Russians do not understand:
“Why do the Russians think the British government cares a hoot about law or evidence? Are the Russians really this brainwashed about the West?
The British government of Tony Blair cooperated with the George W. Bush regime in propagating the lie that Saddam Hussein in Iraq had “weapons of mass destruction.” This lie was used to invade and to destroy Iraq and to leave the country 15 years later in chaos.
The British government also supported the lies about Gaddafi in Libya and participated in overthrowing the Libyan government. The British government also supported the lie that Iran had a nuclear weapons program. There was never any evidence, but evidence was of no interest. An agenda was in motion, and the agenda was independent of evidence.
Although the British Parliament voted down British participation in Obama’s planned invasion of Syria, the current British government supports the lie that Assad is using chemical weapons “against his own people.
By now one would think that Russians, both government, media, and public, would understand that all the West is capable of is to lie. The purpose of the lies is to demonize Russia and to set up Russia for military attack.” SOURCE
However, it appears, at least to an increasingly knowledgeable alternative media and larger numbers of the people, that these staged events are easy to spot for anyone with an ounce of common sense and analytical skill. To pursue the fake threat narrative would suggest that May, Johnson et al have not learned the lessons from history, as so blatantly exemplified by the machinations of Tony Blair and the engineering of war in Iraq and Afghanistan.
With the unquestioning and toothless mainstream media dancing along to the tune of the pied piper, Theresa May, it behoves anyone with the nous to call out their lies for what they are: a ridiculous attempt to demonise Putin and Russia, with the intention of creating a conflict that could initiate a ‘Third World War’.
Acknowledgements: many thanks to Anne and Rob U and Jamie for the kind donations. As ever, special thanks to David R for his most appreciated support.
Anyone who wishes to make a donation in appreciation of the work at RM is encouraged to do so, no matter what size. Thank-you.
Consensus Reality is a phrase that means those sets of things which the majority of people consider to be real. There are countless examples but for the purposes of this article, let’s focus on the fraud of the banking system. Most people wrongly believe that the banks loan them money.
This false belief leads them to the conclusion that their ‘debts’ are real and that they must be paid back, usually with interest. After all, that’s only fair isn’t it? Well, not if you have been duped into believing that you are indeed the ‘borrower’. The professional negligence and failure of the conveyancing solicitor to explain how the mortgage is unlawful for wont of real consideration, how the deed of mortgage is void, why there is no valid agreement between the parties and the failure to disclose just how the ‘funds’ are created amount to one thing: fraud.
Logically, just because the majority of people believe something to be real, does not make it so.
The oft-quoted line from the film, the Matrix is as good an example of what consensus reality means as any:
“This is your last chance. After this, there is no turning back. You take the blue pill — the story ends, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill — you stay in Wonderland and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes.”
The blue pill is the consensus reality; the red is the deeper reality.
Some time ago a blue-pilled individual offered a comment on this site that suggested both Tom Crawford and myself had fallen prey to an “internet theory” which had led us both into taking on the bank known as the Bradford and Bingley (now UKAR) over our purported mortgages. He went on to state that we should simply have paid the bank what it was falsely claiming was owed and that would have allowed us to enjoy the ‘equity’ in our old age.
This blue pill perspective exists only in the consensus reality of those who falsely believe the banks ever make genuine loans, whether on mortgages or of any kind. It is the attitude of those who go along to get along, who ‘pay Caesar what is Caesar’s.’
However, once the red pill has been swallowed – viz., once the individual has become aware of certain hidden truths – there can be no going back, no matter how much one desires to return to that state of (imagined) blissful ignorance.
For instance, prior to 1999, I had been working for 10 years as an English teacher at a school in Leicester. By and large, I was operating via a socialist mindset which resulted in me mistakenly believing that improving the language and literary skills of the children, and enabling them to perform well in examinations, was of benefit to them and to society, and that school was important in the development of every individual, for the collective good of all. I believed too in the consensus reality that the government was there to ensure that resources were evenly distributed and inequities balanced and that the way to achieve this was via a progressive system of taxation. All of which, no doubt, would position me as a statist, someone who believes in the illusion of government operating for the good of all.
The reality, of course, is that government is in the business of extorting money out of people and, should they not pay, locking them up in cages. Council Tax is a prime example of this – Councils commit fraud on people by forcing them to pay even when there is no contractual arrangement between them and the individuals involved. Why should one be forced to pay for ‘services’ which one does not use or require?
Nineteen years on, I can only shake my head at my former self and how I had fallen for the indoctrination of the cultural Marxists and their ilk. I now know that the public education system exists for the purposes of mind control, that all taxation is theft, that government is nothing more than a huge extortion racket, that it is the biggest murderer of people ever and that the politicians are mere puppets who are being played by the hidden hand of the banking and state/military industrial complex. The UK government is most certainly not sovereign on the simple basis that it does not issue its own money and/or credit: all of it is controlled by the Bank of England, which in turn is controlled by the Crown House of Rothschild.
In short: it is all about control and the most expedient way to control the people is through the financial system. All of which, logically, leads me to view that the only way to create free peoples is to educate them to think for themselves.
“The secret of freedom lies in educating people, whereas the secret of tyranny is in keeping them ignorant”
Maximilien Robespierre.
None of that which I have learned concerning the hidden reality of our existences can I magically ‘un-know’ – and why should I wish to? The red pill has been popped. There can be no turning back. Indeed, how could one go back into such a system knowing what one knows? It would mean slipping into an intolerable state of self-delusion.
For all that, some who claim to have popped the red pill are unaware that they have further to go – especially when they continue to place their faith in the corrupt government and its self-serving politicians.
It is very easy to regret one’s decisions yet perhaps harder to remember one’s own larger purpose.
When we pay attention, life unfolds purposefully. Connections with others, shared understandings, a sense of purposefulness fall on us as divine blessings.
Now, this site does not get many visitors but, rest assured, those who are here to read these posts are those for whom I write. When one enjoys that sense of one’s connections with others, it can lead to revelatory moments at which point it is possible to step into one’s powers and realise that our actions do have an impact on the consciousness of mankind.
Does that make me an optimist? Possibly, but consider this: could it actually be I am a realist instead? Or, what about a realistic optimist?
It seems logical to me that the system is wholly based on compliance and, when that can not be had, it uses violence against the individual, regardless of the absence of agreement. That is the ‘might is right’ modus operandi; the opposite of which is voluntary association. Every one is free to enter into an agreement/contract with any individual or entity he chooses and, it thus follows, no one has the right to force bogus contracts on any one. It boils down to right and wrong – which is always matter of conscience.
By way of illustration, here is an entry on David Thoreau concerning Individualist anarchism:
“(Thoreau’s) essay Civil Disobedience (Resistance to Civil Government) was first published in 1849. It argues that people should not permit governments to overrule or atrophy their consciences, and that people have a duty to avoid allowing such acquiescence to enable the government to make them the agents of injustice. Thoreau was motivated in part by his disgust with slavery and the Mexican–American War.
The American version of individualist anarchism has a strong emphasis on the non-aggression principle and individual sovereignty. Some individualist anarchists, such as Thoreau, do not speak of economics but simply the right of “disunion” from the state, and foresee the gradual elimination of the state through social evolution.” Wikipedia
The power to abolish the oppressive tyranny of the state lies solely with the people – a fact that the apparatus of the conditioning system known as state education utterly fails to address on the simple basis that to do so would almost certainly hasten its demise.
It can be somewhat depressing to realise that the entire system is fraudulent – for example, many do realise that Council tax is extortion and the Banking sector is an elaborate illusion. But what are they doing about it? The answer is to learn the nature of the illusion via self-education and then educate others:
“Self-education is, I firmly believe, the only kind of education there is.” ― Isaac Asimov
Consensus reality rightly dictates that if something is borrowed, then it must be returned. However, in the case of a mortgage or, indeed, any ‘loan’ from a bank, nothing is loaned – credit is merely extended by way of the signature of the one who is falsely labelled the ‘borrower’.
On the subject of the fraudulent banking system, which is exposed in all its gory detail in the documentary, the Great British Mortgage Swindle, what would you do if you had the means to redeem your mortgage whilst simultaneously having the full knowledge that your mortgage is void and that no loan ever factually took place? Would you not seek to challenge the bank to prove there is a valid lawful mortgage and that the bank can prove it made a loan before handing over tens of thousands of pounds?
Antonio Horta-Osorio, CEO, Halifax
In the following actual situation the ‘mortgagor’ is in the genuine position of being able to pay off the alleged balance in full. Thus, his request of AntonioHorta-Osorio (left), the CEO of the purported lender, ‘the Halifax’ (part of HBOS) is sincere.
Remember too, if the mortgage was valid then there should be no problem with the bank producing the requested items in exchange for him settling the balance. The following redacted correspondence reveals the full extent of the CEO’s obfuscation of the facts and the fraudulent nature of the banking swindle.
The reader is encouraged to take note of the stipulation that this is in no way to be treated as a complaint.
The response from the CEO’s underling, Wendy Zeal, completely ignored that fact:
Antonio was provided with another opportunity to respond in substance and was helpfully furnished with a copy of Professor Richard Werner’s investigation that demonstrates how banks create money out of thin air:
The next response from the same office was again characterised by blatant misrepresentation:
A short and to-the-point response was sent to Antonio’s Office of the Chief Executive:
Once again, his willing partner in the fraud, Wendy Zeal, sent a reply that amounted to another misrepresentation of the facts. Remember, this is a genuine attempt to redeem the mortgage:
Now, let’s consider what is going on here.
Firstly, it is clear from the correspondence that Antonio, the CEO, is denying a customer the chance to settle the balance on an alleged mortgage. That is an unlawful action. Why is he doing so?
Secondly, by treating it as complaint, he and his minion, Wendy Zeal, are committing fraud by misrepresentation, in breach of the 2006 Fraud Act, of which section 2 states:
2 Fraud by false representation
(1) A person is in breach of this section if he—
(a) dishonestly makes a false representation, and
(b) intends, by making the representation—
(i) to make a gain for himself or another, or
(ii) to cause loss to another or to expose another to a risk of loss.
(2) A representation is false if—
(a) it is untrue or misleading, and
(b) the person making it knows that it is, or might be, untrue or misleading.
(3) “Representation” means any representation as to fact or law, including a representation as to the state of mind of—
(a) the person making the representation, or
(b) any other person.
(4) A representation may be express or implied.
(5) For the purposes of this section a representation may be regarded as made if it (or anything implying it) is submitted in any form to any system or device designed to receive, convey or respond to communications (with or without human intervention). Source
Now, for anyone with a fully functioning brain, the responses from the CEO of the Halifax are clearly fraudulent, as defined by the legislation. Why so?
Could it be that he is unable to provide the requested items?
Why doesn’t he simply state that whilst he cannot hand over those items, the mortgagor can still go ahead and redeem his mortgage, as is his long-established right?
Has he got something to hide? A search engine quickly reveals that Antonio is certainly not the most honourable of men. An internal memo from him to all employees of the Halifax stressed that they should at all times behave in ways that are morally correct. Yet, a few months later, Antonio was caught, in flagrante delicto, cheating on his wife – an act which purportedly resulted in him having his annual salary cut by a mouth-watering £3 million.
Assuming that she is a capable and intelligent woman, Wendy Zeal, by going along with the misrepresentations of her boss, is also complicit in the fraud. She would do well to heed some advice from scripture:
“You shall not spread a false report. You shall not join hands with a wicked man to be a malicious witness.” Exodus 23:1 23
Whilst the situation is not over yet, it starkly illustrates the almost casual fraud and arrogant behaviour of those working in the higher echelons of the Rothschild Central Banking Game and how the system treats its mortgagors with contempt. The reader is also reminded that HBOS, of which the Halifax is part, were bailed out by way of stolen taxes to the tune of £45 billion when it failed some ten years ago.
TBGMS: Are you ready to take the red, white and blue pill?
Of course, the colossal failures and fraud of those who operate at the higher end of the corrupt banking system are revealed in The Great British Mortgage Swindle. The question is are the British people ready to pop the red, white and blue pill and do something about it? Or, are they content to live in a state of financial and spiritual enslavement to a system of fraud and control that extorts them at every opportunity?
And, for the avoidance of doubt, any blue pilled individual who fancies having a dig is encouraged to engage his brain first and stick to the facts. Don’t take my word for it that the system is rigged: here are the words of the former governor of the Bank of England (you know the entity that runs the entire shit parade that passes for a finance) –
Acknowledgment: a huge thank-you to David R for his continued support. It is truly appreciated.
The notorious Bradford and Bingley Building Society (now known as UKAR), who were bailed out to the tune of £19.1b in 2008, was the Bank at the heart of the matter that arose between themselves and Tom Crawford of Nottingham.
STRONGHOLD: B&B (UKAR) HQ, BINGLEY, WEST YORKSHIRE.
Whilst this was not the first time this unscrupulous financial entity had been involved in a ‘difficult’ and fraudulent possession claim via the city’s county court, it marked the remarkable rise of a genuine grassroots movement determined to wipe out the scourge of the Great British Mortgage Swindle.
RogueMale has written about this matter in some detail previously and anyone who is not familiar with the issue is encouraged to dip into the articles.
The key question that any mortgagor should be asking is this –
“did the bank actually lend me any moneys to purchase my house?”
The splendid work of Professor Richard Werner of Southampton University on this matter emphatically demonstrates that the credit creation behind all loans and mortgages means the funds are created out of thin air. That is how the system works – 97% of the money supply in the UK is created out of the ether. Here is a quotation from Richard Werner that answers the question in a way that few will ever go near:
“I will tell you key points about banks.
In case you thought banks lend money, they take deposits and lend money. You are wrong .
Banking was developed, modern banking was developed, in the United Kingdom in the 17th century and the legal facts are very clear but not very well known.
Banks do not take deposits and banks do not lend money. That’s a fact. How is that possible? Well, legally they do not take deposits. They borrow from the public, because your money at the bank is not on deposit. Its not held in custody, it’s not a bailment. What is it legally? You have lent money to the bank. So the expression in banking are designed to mislead what’s really happening. Who is the owner of this money? It is the banks, you are just a general creditor. Which is very different from the impression given when we use the term deposit.
What about lending surely banks lend money? No they don’t.
No bank has ever lent any money.
How is that possible? What does a bank do?
Banks purchase securities and they don’t pay up. That’s what they do. How is that? Well if you go to the bank and you borrow money you sign a loan contract. Very crucial.
Your signature creates the money supply. Because the bank legally will consider the loan contract a promissory note.
And that is what is considered legally, is a promissory note.
Just like the bank of England Note, central bank money, paper money, is a promissory note from the central bank. And the bank purchases this contract. That is what they do, they purchase the loan contract. Now they owe you money.
You say I dont care about the mechanics, give me the money. The banker will say we will put it in your account. You will find it in your bank account. Well what is a bank account? It is not a deposit. Its a record of the bank’s debt to the public. It is a record of the bank’s debt to the new borrower, and they show you the record of how much money they owe you. That is it, they don’t pay up. And this is how the money supply is created. So lets go in sequence:
Step one: You go to the bank and you sign the loan contract, say a thousand pounds. This will be recorded in the bank balance sheet as an increase in bank assets. The bank, will then, record its debt to the borrower. But it will do some accountant trick. It should really say this is an accounts payable item. Something that the bank has to pay but it has not yet paid. But it won’t record as an accounts payable. If you talk to an bank’s accountant they are horrified “No you cannot use an expression like accounts payable in a bank” And do you know why? Because they recorded it as customer deposit. They show it on the bank’s liability side as a customer deposit. But nobody has deposited it, the customer has not deposited for sure. The customer is borrowing it.
The bank has not deposited either. It is added to the money supply, and this is how 97% of the money supply is created out of nothing on the basis of a signature and of course on the credit of the borrower. That is money creation. So no money is transferred from any where else to the borrowers account.”
When asked in court to prove the alleged amount ‘owed’ by the Tom and Sue Crawford, the bank was unable to do so, relying entirely on a computer ‘print out’ which was dismissed by the Judge, Nigel Godsmark (not that his final judgement went anywhere near that issue).
That fact needs to be stressed as clearly as possible, for it applies to all mortgagors, – when asked for verifiable proof that an amount is owed, the banks are incapable of providing it. Why? Because it is fictitious: it operates in the realms of fantasy. Any consideration on the part of the bank is an illusion.
The epic battle undertaken by Michael of Bernicia and the trustees of the family property portfolio against HBOS establishes a number of facts concerning the other illusions that exist at the heart of the swindle:
There is no lawful contract, no signed agreement between the parties, as required at law.
There is no valid mortgage deed, properly executed by the mortgagors – despite the fact that a conveyancing solicitor, Tim Grey of Sintons Lawyers in Newcastle, oversaw each and every aspect of the purported mortgages.
That being the case, there is no valid and binding power of attorney, despite the fact that the banks claim to have an ‘irrevocable’ one – which is a legal impossibility.
Thus, the swindle is predicated upon a series of illusions, which renders the entire mortgage industry a monumental fraud, perpetrated upon the people. There are some 11.2 million of these fraudulent devices registered at the Land Registry. It is literally a racket of monstrous proportions.
THE REALITY OF INSTITUTIONALISED MORTGAGE FRAUD.
As the aphorism goes, the closer one is to the target, the greater the flak one can expect.
Sure enough, those paid trolls, shills and agents of the state and the banksters emerged from the shadows as soon as Tom and the Crawford family began to attract hundreds if not thousands of supporters to their cause.
Many of these trolls and shills sought to falsely and maliciously paint Tom as a stubborn misguided man who should simply have ‘paid off’ the fraudulent sum of £43k that was being claimed by the bank.
One such character suggested it be done by crowd funding – an option rejected by Tom on the basis of the facts. In every sense, nothing was owed. The bank had already unjustly enriched itself to the tune of over £120k in the form of payments made by Tom and Sue over the 25 years of the void mortgage, why should he make any kind of payment, let alone enlist the support of the public when said public had already been fleeced, one way or another, by the swindle, as have we all?
That same individual once suggested to me that “everyone knows that’s how banking works” and that we should all simply pay Caesar what is Caesar’s. A glib response that serves only to maintain the status quo and which suggests he has some kind of vested interest in the continuation of the swindle. The levels of vitriol that spewed out from all those agents was like a tsunami and the Crawford family were deluged across the social media in utter bullshit. I sometimes wonder how many have truly grasped the enormity of the fraud and thus understood how it has been used to enslave us all to false debt, simply to keep a roof over our heads.
The attitude of those who say that that is how it works and there is nothing we can do about it is, in one word, pathetic. It is characterised by denial whereby many seek to hide from the facts and cognitive dissonance clouds their minds. Yet, do we really need to be concerned with the majority of people who are unwilling or incapable of realising the truth of the matter?
For what are the implications of huge numbers of people seeing through the illusions of TGBMS?
An end to the genocide of eviction and greater personal freedom for all. That is it.
To educate the people to the facts of TGBMS is the frequently stated aim of much of the work at this site. Whilst the release of the film will certainly go a long way to achieving that, in the meantime, anyone who has not quite grasped the reality that the banks do not lend anything is encouraged to watch the short film below in which Professor Richard Werner succinctly explains to a gathering of accountants the fact that credit creation leads to ‘money’ being created out of thin air. Quite what the hundreds of thousands of accountants across these lands would make of it is anyone’s guess, given the fact that they have a vested interest in continuing the illusion. However, they and all those who perpetuate the fraud of the banking system will, ultimately, be proven to be on the wrong side of history. All of which is more the reason for all right thinking individuals to salute the stance taken by Tom Crawofrd and those thousands who support him.
Acknowledgements: David R for his generous sponsorship of this site and, once again, Michael of Bernicia for his unflinching determination and robust exposition of the swindle in all its forms.
Finally, if one has the means and appreciates the work at this site, please make a donation of any size via the donate button.
Defeating dogma has never been easy. On many occasions, the individual can become disheartened that his efforts appear to have come to nought. Taking my own experiences over the last 8 years, during which time I took on the government bank known as the Bradford and Bingley over my void mortgage and ended up being callously and criminally evicted, I can perfectly understand how and why such a state of mind may come about. The voice of my ego will tell me things like ‘it was all for nothing; you worked all those years for the house and now you have fuck all; you should have played the game; it was pointless to risk it all in a game which you could never win; the odds were stacked against you; it was hopeless from the beginning; look at you, penniless and for what point?’ etc.
At such times my self-criticising ego may bemoan the fact that this website doesn’t attract much interest and that no-one is paying attention to the work. This only serves to reinforce the egoic thinking that all the effort has indeed been pointless.
However, being essentially nihilistic in origin, such thinking does not serve me. The RogueMale site has never been about attracting huge numbers of people: the writings are often lengthy and therefore the audience for them is of a particular quality – namely those who are able to read fluently and with the required levels of discernment and critical thinking. It is a case of quality over quantity and it was ever thus.
Popularity is not something I have ever courted. It belongs to the world of the glib, the smooth operator and the one who seeks approval outside himself:
“… the neurotic anxiously seeks the esteem and affection of the largest number of people…”
The world is awash with psychological operations which stem from many sources, particularly religion and all forms of external governance. Most if not all of these ‘psy-ops’ are dependent upon the continued perpetration of untruths, lies that are repeated so often, they become accepted by the uncritical mind as being the truth. When those in (false) ‘authority’ repeat those lies, they operate as agents of dogma:
dogma
noun
a principle or set of principles laid down by an authority as incontrovertibly true: the Christian dogma of the Trinity | the rejection of political dogma.
ORIGIN
mid 16th cent.: via late Latin from Greek dogma ‘opinion,’ from dokein ‘seem good, think,’ from Greek dogmatikos “pertaining to doctrines,” from dogma (genitive dogmatos) “opinion, tenet,” literally “that which one thinks is true,” from dokein “to seem good, think” (from PIE root *dek- “to take, accept”). Related: Dogmatical (c. 1600).
As the discerning one knows, the truth is simply that which is so.
Dogma, as defined above, may be true but, more regularly, it is false. As such it can be used to promote falsehoods. Interestingly, the fallacy of the appeal to authority is what often underpins a dogma, as can be exemplified by the religious dogmas relied upon by the Vatican (or other organised religions).
Throughout the pages of this website, it is stated that the Great British Mortgage Swindle is a fraud of monstrous proportions, that exists largely due to the inability of the people to understand just how it operates, both in terms of finance and the legal system.
Its operation is dependent upon the miseducation of the general populace (which thus has no ability to think critically) and the fake authorities that are used to shore up the swindle. However, its continued existence is hanging by a precarious thread, which is constantly unwinding as more and more of those people who are capable of critical thinking grasp the nature and the workings of the swindle. That unravelling thread is the pretence that the mortgage is lawful – that there has been consideration (an actual loan) on the part of the bank, that there has been a meeting of the minds of all parties (a necessary requirement for a valid contract to exist) and that every aspect of the ‘agreement’ has been disclosed. The absence of any one of which is enough to render the mortgage ‘agreement’ void ab initio.
Over the last 8 years I have taken part in or been present at many court hearings for (false) possession claims made by banks where the lawyers for the banks and the judges sweat their way through the proceedings, fumble for words and nervously shift in their seats due to the fact that they are being confronted with the truth of the matter:
No loan has taken place – the credit (‘money’) for the purchase of the house was created out of thin air.
The mortgage deed is void, a lie put to paper, fraudulently signed before any ‘advance’ has taken place and illegally executed before the ‘mortgagor’ was in possession of the house.
There is no valid contract for a mortgage in place as required at law, signed by all parties.
These are the facts. They are not based on any fallacy. Indeed, any one who is able to point out any errors in fact or reason is invited to do so. The fact that no conveyancing solicitor ever points out the unlawful aspects of the mortgage agreement he is advising his client to enter renders the entire profession liable to a negligence claim once a mortgagor has sustained losses. That link demonstrates how one senior judge, Mr Ross Cranston, former solicitor general to the Labour government, took it upon himself – or, as is more likely the case, carried out instructions from his handlers – to pervert the course of justice, just like all his cohorts did. It is fair to state that he was most nervous in the hearing as he went about shutting down a valid claim against the conveyancing solicitor and that his void judgement was pre-written (he did not retire to ‘deliberate’ but launched straight into it).
His extreme discomfort (and that of the legal profession and the British judiciary as a whole) was caused by his reliance upon dogma which flies in the face of the facts and reason. Dogma which exists as consequence of brainwashing (‘education’) and which blinds him and his ilk to the truth.
Thus, when presented with the facts, it is often the case that the judges will resort to the dogmatic expression,
“Well, you got the house didn’t you?”
Or, the solicitor will falsely claim that the mortgagor’s defence has “no basis in law”, often citing another such case where a miscarriage of justice took place as proof that the mortgagor’s claim is “hopeless”. Alternatively, the solicitor will falsely claim that the mortgagor is a ‘vexatious litigant’.
Thus it follows that both judge and solicitor are reliant upon dogma. The judiciary repeats the line in a desperate and underhand attempt to get the mortgagor into agreement that a loan took place (after all, if no loan took place then the entire proceedings are null and void and the bank is committing fraud by bringing the claim in the first place, with its CEO and minions all guilty of perjury too, for without consideration by the bank, there can be no valid contract and no money is due because no actual loan ever occurred).
A solicitor who defends a bank in such matters is totally dependent upon the fallacy known as the appeal to authority, a fake judicial authority that by failing to rule, time after time, upon the facts, has individually and collectively perverted the course of justice in order for the illusion to continue.
“It’s not what we don’t know that hurts us, it’s what we do know that isn’t so.”
The truth of this statement is plain and whilst it accurately applies to #TGBMS, it is applicable to any field of knowledge.
This aphorism is wholly applicable to the British Court System and all those banking acolytes and apologists who peddle the dogma that the 11.2 million mortgages in Britain are in any way valid.
Challenging its dogmas is a costly and demoralising exercise, for sure but it is necessary to do so in order that the racket may fall and, be sure of it, it will collapse for its roots are rotten to the core.
Rest assured, those dogma dominoes are there to be toppled and it only takes one finger from one individual to begin the fall. Roll on the release of the new and improved The Great British Mortgage Swindle, the film that is guaranteed to not just knock down the dominoes but obliterate them.
Finally, to all those who may be experiencing doubt and frustration over the state of the world today and the refusal of many to wake up to the tyranny that exists all around them, though your audience may be small and some may appear not to be listening, your efforts are worthwhile – keep knocking down the dominoes and never underestimate the power of what you do to have an effect.
Acknowledgements: Michael O’Bernicia for his vision and steadfast inspiration and David R for his unerring support and sponsorship of the work at RogueMale. Always appreciated, brothers.
Make no mistake, when a small group of determined individuals stand up to tyranny, there is an effect.
8 years ago, I took on the might of the Rothschild Banking Monopoly by making a counter claim in Nottingham County Court against the Bradford and Bingley who had begun false possession proceedings against my home of 15 years:
RM’S STOLEN HOME, MARCH 2011.
That counter claim was grounded on 4 basic principles:
Each of the above elements form the basis of the multi-levelled Great British Mortgage Swindle. The battle for my home raged on for some 16 months and was falsely termed by Richard Inglis, the then circuit judge at Nottingham, as “scandalous”, when the real scandal is the very existence of The Great British Mortgage Swindle.
It is no exaggeration to state that the resistance was a source of inspiration to others and that the resulting groundswell of support rose to a magnificent level when hundreds of people turned up on July 23, 2014 and January 23, 2015 in support of the Crawford Family who were similarly defrauded by the same bank:
THE PEOPLE: TAKING NO SHIT, THE CRAWFORDS HOME, CARLTON, NOTTINGHAM 23 JULY 2014.
As we know, the only way the Crawfords were defeated was the same way I was – the police, the courts and the bank colluded in what was termed ‘Operation Hooper’ that only succeeded because of deception and criminality.
8 years on from when I stepped into court to defend my home against the false possession claim, and one can see the effect of such resistance: mortgage repossessions are manifestly down. People are going into the courts and challenging the false possession claims against their homes to the point where:
“The Ministry of Justice has released data (which) shows that the number of annual mortgage repossessions enforced by the courts fell from around 25,000 to under 5,000, during the six year production period of TGBMS, a film which chronicles the struggles of the very people who made that happen.” source
Quite rightly, much is made about the decline in British standards of living. Much is made about ‘austerity’. Much is made about the lack of jobs. Much is made about the fact that many young people cannot afford to buy their own homes.
The solution? Demolish the mortgage system. Cage the bankers responsible. And, thus, free the people from having to pay extortion moneys to keep a roof over their heads.
To do so would result in the people being free. Free to be creative. Free to spend more money in the local and national economy, thereby providing the country with a massive boost to its productivity.
If that sounds over-simplified, then so be it. The fact is, people are living under a yoke of fake debt. Everyone, no matter where they may dwell is living in a condition of hyper-inflation, whereby housing costs (rent or mortgage) have increased exponentially over our life times, a fact which is hidden from all the ‘cost of living’ statistics. By way of illustration, when RM was a student in the mid-eighties, a ‘studio’ or bedsit could be rented for between £12 and £18 per week. The same would now be at least £100 per week. As ever, the only ones who benefit from such an iniquitous state of affairs are those who operate as bankers and a control system which seeks to subjugate the people.
How many will it take? As many as is necessary. Each day more and more wake up to the tyranny. For those who feel the task is hopeless, let us remember: never underestimate the power of a determined few to bring about change.
There are many attacks made on children, whether perpetrated under the guise of religion, health or education/brainwashing. However, male genital mutilation is not usually accorded the same levels of outrage and condemnation as female genital mutilation. Some would, quite reasonably, posit that is because we live in a gynocentric world in which feminism is rife, women have been promoted to positions of power for which they are manifestly ill-equipped (see the demise of Sweden) and, as ever, men’s lives are expendable. The male is here to make and be a sacrifice to war, to the ‘system’ and for the benefit of women. His life is of less value and, accordingly, it will generally not be as long as a female’s.
The issue of male genital mutilation is one RM has written about before – its origins lie in the bizarre dystopian history and development of Judaism. The fact that Rabbis are still engaging in this barbaric act, in the name of their ‘religion’ cannot justify it:
An act of Genocide. In the name of religion, Rabbi cuts off infant foreskin then sucks the blood.
It’s interesting to note too that Muslims also commit this barbaric act against their male issue. This link is about a woman in Nottingham, who had a boy child with a muslim who one day took the child away and had him circumcised, without her permission.
It is a fecking weird and wholly damaging practice, whichever way one looks at it but the bottom line is this:
a child is born into the world and (barring any birth defect) he is born perfectly equipped, in body and mind to make his way through life on this world. Which is just as God/Nature intended. Any suggestion that his foreskin is an imperfection that needs to be rectified is utter nonsense. It is there to serve a purpose, as previously explained in this article.
No one, whether father, mother, doctor, health visitor or priest/rabbi has the right to sanction or engage in any form of mutilation upon any infant. This point is succinctly argued here by Christopher Hitchens:
Of course, there are some sick individuals and groups in this world who promote and attempt to justify all manner of crimes against children. Many of the abusers of children operate at high levels of the control system. Mind control via sexual abuse is, when one looks into it, another barbaric act that needs to be completely removed from the face of the planet. Nothing can justify it, which is why one should be very wary of any institution, lobby group or individual which attempts to promote it as simply another aspect of life which should be normalised or de-stigmatised.
This link identifies how sodomy of children – especially boys – around the age of 3 is used to create mind controlled individuals. It makes for shocking reading. Nevertheless, it is worthy of our consideration if one is to be aware of the levels of depravity that operate on this planet.
All of which is part of the war against nature. In their natural state, our brains enable us to think logically, to extrapolate and work things out as is necessary for us to make our way through our lives’ journeys. If some one is trying to deceive you, then it helps if you are able to apply critical thinking and see through the methodology by which he is seeking to do so. The aim of these sick controllers is to promote a godless state – within and without the individual. Thus, devices are used to hamper brain function in each of us whilst events are engineered to induce chaos across regions to destabilise the many. If you cannot work out the machinations of the world around you, the influences that shape your psyche and the means by which you are subjugated, then you are living in a state of godlessness.
Would it be overly controversial to state that all the methods used against mankind are designed specifically to leave him in such a state? Manipulation of our DNA via vaccinations, chemical spraying of crops, genetically engineered food, geo-engineering of the very air we breathe, (mis)education systems, pharmaceutical drugging, mental viruses placed in popular culture, tyrannical financial controls, war, social engineering, feminism, cultural marxism, phoney religions, eugenics, government psy-ops, media production, registration systems that lead to enslavement, taxation, oppressive judicial control… the list is extensive but each element serves the same ultimate purpose – to keep the individual from realising his christ like consciousness and from being fully-functioning, as nature intended.
To put it mildly, we live on a weird plane of existence. But our reality has been engineered for nefarious reasons. Those reasons may, quite reasonably, be described as satanic in so far as they are anti-nature/God.
The question is, does the individual acquiesce or does he resist, using the full might of his own critical thinking and ability to take action against those who would oppress him and curtail his life?
In any event, the real warrior is the one who takes care of the young, the infirm and the elderly:
If previous generations had paid attention to what was being engineered around them, then we may not have come to find ourselves in this state of being. Don’t let anyone convince you there is nothing we can do about it. Resist it, step away from the state-sponsored tyranny, stop paying those extortionate taxes, refuse to register your children, home educate them, take your name off the electoral role and should anyone commit trespass against you, tell them to fuck off.
If you are feeling generous and would like to support the work at RogueMale, donations are greatly appreciated and can be made via the paypal donation button. Many thanks.
The Manchester ‘bombing’ narrative of 2017 is riddled with more holes than a string vest.
Once again, another ‘attack’ is carried out by what the official narrative (and it is just that, a ‘storyline’) terms a ‘lone’ individual who was known to the security services (Mi5 et al).
The date was 22 May, 2017 and, purportedly, there were 22 victims. Notice the number 22, it’s a recurring digit.
As a consequence, armed troops are deployed alongside armed cops across the streets of Britain. These men with guns are largely stationed outside Buckingham Palace, Downing Street and Parliament.
In a display of pure idiocy, we have mainstream images of the people actually embracing these moves:
Fuckwittery at its most brazen, Newcastle, end May, 2017.
Theresa May has thus used this occurrence in Manchester, along with the 22 March ‘incident’ and the alleged murder of MP, Jo Cox, as justification for partial martial law and as a fuel to the electioneering slogan of her political party.
One question that rarely arises is that of the competency of those who are armed with these automatic weapons. Based on my personal experiences of the police, for instance, I would posit that many of these individuals are the last people one should trust to be going round the streets with guns, as many of them are unthinking reactionaries, ever prone to knee jerk reactions and always willing to carry out the orders of their masters. In all seriousness, many appear to be mentally unstable and operating from a position whereby they falsely believe that their uniforms exonerate them from such crimes as assault, actual bodily harm, kidnap and false imprisonment.
Since 9/11, a plethora of ‘security’ measures has been introduced that are supposed to make the people feel ‘safer’. CCTV, more armed cops, scanning devices at airports, courts and other ‘public’ buildings; all for the ‘war on terror’. Yet, none of these appear to work at the moments they are most required – cameras are either shut down or not working at the time, so no footage of the purported attacks ever manifests and there is never any news of an individual being caught with a rucksack of weaponry, despite the security ‘pat downs’ and scanning devices in situ.
A constant theme that runs through these narratives is that of a training exercise taking place, either at the time, like the 7/7 Tube event of 2005, or as in this case, a year before at the Trafford Centre, just outside Manchester.
These exercises are big business, with numbers of crisis actors being employed to act out the scenes under the direction of those who organise them. This is footage of the Trafford Centre drill from 2016:
Apparently, the Greater Manchester Police also released a warning that there would be a controlled explosion on the night in question:
Just a coincidence, nothing to see here.
The disreputable President Nixon claimed that the American public would not believe something had happened unless they saw it on television, such are the levels of brainwashing and programming that the people are subjected to. The ‘goggle box’ is thus a prime instrument in the promulgation of these events, but the controlled printed media also plays a significant role, with its unquestioning allegiance to the narratives spun out by the Reuters and Associated Press ‘news agencies’, as controlled by the House of Rothschild.
Therein, of course, lies the root of the real ‘Fake News’. Thus, highly suspect images are thrown in to the mix, some blatantly photoshopped, some simply mind boggling in the number of anomalies they throw out.
Manchester ‘attack’ – man loses trousers, thank god it wasn’t his life.
Photo-shopped? Or simply very long legged?
In the aftermath of these ‘attacks’ (some of which, include genuine casualties, others none), interviews with supposedly bereaved ‘parents’ are added to the mix. A cake of fakery gets baked.
Some will, of course, vehemently deny that crisis actors were deployed in the Manchester event and will, as a knee jerk reaction, question those who put forward the possibility that these are actors, whose roles have been scripted by those who conduct and direct the ‘drills’.
However, is it really that unlikely? Is it beyond the realms of possibility that those crisis actors who were used before and after the event were not instructed along these lines?
Director of drill: “So, each of you has a role to play. We want to make it as realistic as possible. Some of you will play the victims, with fake blood and wounds applied to you by our skilled make up artists. This adds to the realism and, as such, gives those in the emergency services a valuable opportunity to act in a situation that is as realistic as possible. This is a good thing.
Others will be instructed in role play so they can act out the parts of the grieving relatives. Learn your lines, and be ready to take part in the media exercise. Again, this will be made as realistic as possible, with you being provided with the opportunity to be interviewed and filmed by the media. Your role is important as it all adds to the realism of the incident. Yes, it’s role play and a chance for you to show us how good your acing skills are. It’s all a kind of theatre and, who knows, if you are good, it may well lead to other opportunities. How many of you have heard of ‘method acting’? ”
That people readily swallow this sort of guff without question is perhaps not surprising, given the brain washing levels and psychological manipulation that is spun out by the media and the massive onslaught of the state’s miseducation programming via its ‘schooling’ system.
Those with the critical thinking skills are able to question all of this and draw their own reasonable conclusions, but, alas, the vast majority of people swallow it all, hook, line and sinker, without ever engaging in the underlying constructs of these staged events, false flags and hoaxes.
Rarely too do they appreciate that controlled governments stand as the biggest murderers of people throughout history.
Cui Bono?
The controllers – CFR, Roundtable, Club of 300, Bilderberg, Chatham House, the polipuppets, the Military Industrial Complex, security firms, emergency drill companies, crisis actors, and any and all who wish to keep mankind in a state of engineered fear. Which, naturally, includes the House of Rothschild:
The Rothschilds were not the treasurers, but the chiefs of that first secret Communism… Marx and the highest chiefs of the First International… were controlled by Baron Lionel Rothschild [1808-1878].
A fearful mind, is not a creative mind, being paralysed as it is in a false state of consciousness and such a mind is easy to control. Such a mind is susceptible to the manipulation that falsely claims we need more police, whether armed or otherwise.
Thus, most people exist in a state of conditioned consciousness, ever willing to pay (via taxation) for their existence in the virtual slave plantation, in which fake debt mounts upon them and their freedoms are constantly handed over to their ‘betters’, for their own ‘protection’.
Sadly, they fail to realise that the persistent threat to their lives comes not from without, but within their ‘state’, as succinctly espoused here by the Bernician:
However, in the long term, all of this will serve to awaken more people to the controls and oppressions. As increasing numbers cotton on to the nature of their constructed realities, they will rise up. It is inevitable and, despite the insurmountable odds, RM chooses to maintain that this occurrence will manifest at some point.
It is a question of ‘when’, not if.
The sleeper has to awaken: there is no other choice.
In relation to which, let me take this opportunity to salute each and every individual who relentlessly continues to reveal the ‘grand game’ and its theatrical methodologies.
In the meantime, question everything and utilise your God-given common sense.
The Rothschilds, their Polipuppets and the Fraud of the General Election
A Punch & Judy Show: Corbyn & May
Let’s face facts – the ‘snap’ election scheduled for 8th June, 2017 is nothing more than a sophisticated puppet show, the result of which will be rigged in favour of those who control the marionettes who operate on the stage known as the House of Commons. These marionettes are collectively known as politicians. However, a more suitable expression may be ‘polipuppet’, which for the purposes of clarity can be defined thus:
polipuppet |ˌpolipupett|
noun
a life-long actor who obediently and professionally plays the role of a political party representative, and is controlled by the House of Rothschild and/or its agencies.
Margaret Thatcher was a British polipuppet whose decimation of the country’s industry was carried out under the instructions of N. M. Rothschild.
ORIGIN
21st century English: from Old French politique ‘political,’ via Latin from Greek politikos, from politēs ‘citizen,’ from polis ‘city’ and ‘puppet’ mid 16th cent. (denoting a doll): later form of poppet, generally having a more unfavourable connotation.
In the same way the life-long actor known as Donald Trump was falsely presented as a maverick candidate who was inserted to quell the rising tide of nationalism amongst an awakening American populace (who merely voted for a new CEO of the USA Corporation) both May and Corbyn will be offered up as ‘solutions’ to the problems facing the UK Corporation.
Puppets on Strings
The puppet show will serve a number of purposes, each of which is beneficial to the hidden hand that controls the fake ‘state’, the main ones being the ‘divide and rule’ agenda and the continuation of the fraud of the banks.
It is now an established fact that the banks do not lend anything and are in the business of buying securities like loan agreements and mortgages to create streams of credit, made-up figures, literally created on a computer. On the back of these fake loans, for which, obviously, there is no consideration on the part of the banks, people’s homes are being stolen by way of void possession orders, issued by a judiciary that has been instructed to maintain the pretence that moneys are owed.
“You got the money to buy the house, didn’t you?”
being the increasingly unsophisticated argument posed by any judge who is forced to go anywhere near the fact that no loan ever took place.
Of course, it is not only individuals who are paying out on fake loans, under the pretence that money is owed; it is also the local councils who have taken out the long term ‘loans’ known as LOBOs.
In any event, the effect is the same – the individual is coerced into picking up the tab for the fake debt. Thus, council tax payers are facing rises in payments in order to service the criminal interest rates piled on top of the fake loans. Services are being cut as a direct consequence. It is fair to state that the banks are like parasites that have infested the private and public bodies of the people. They bleed us dry as they simultaneously fill their vaults with ill-gotten gains.
To charge interest is usury and under the ancient law of these lands, usury is unlawful – and, for good reason.
To charge interest on fictitious loans is nothing less than criminal.
It all amounts to the people being subjected to a pernicious form of indentured servitude, or slavery by another name. So much for “Rule, Britannia, Britons never will be slaves.”
The answer as to how they have been getting away with it for so long may well lie in the miseducation and general dumbing down that the people have been subjected to over the last 150 years or so and, of course, the fake news media, whose purpose is to promulgate the status quo.
The notion that the polipuppets known as May or Corbyn, both of whom have sworn an oath to the Privy Council, a vow never to hear any criticism of ‘the Crown’, are actually in charge of the ‘nation’ is, in the light of the facts, utterly ludicrous to any one with a fully functioning brain and knowledge of financial operations.
The fact is that, just as all around the world bar – an increasingly small number of sovereign nations – the whole rotten edifice of this indentured servitude is controlled by the House of Rothschild, a family of pernicious financial parasites that has ruled the roost for at least 200 years in the Britain alone.
The Rothschild family claims to be Jewish. Its tentacles extend into every aspect of our lives, all around the world.
Prior to 1858, it was unlawful for a non Christian to sit in the House of Commons on the basis that he would be unable to swear his allegiance to God and the people whom he was supposed to be serving. The law was changed in order to allow Lionel de Rothschild to take up a position:
“1847: Lionel De Rothschild now married to the daughter of his uncle, Kalmann (Carl) Mayer Rothschild, is elected to the parliamentary seat for the City of London.
A requirement for entering parliament was to take an oath in the true faith of a Christian. Lionel De Rothschild refused to do this as he was Jewish and his seat in parliament remained empty for 11 years until new oaths were allowed. He must have been an invaluable representative for his constituency, bearing in mind he could never vote on any bill as he never entered parliament! I wonder how he managed to keep his parliamentary seat for 11 years?”
“1858: Lionel De Rothschild finally takes his seat in parliament when the requirement to take an oath in the true faith of a Christian is broadened to include other oaths. He becomes the first Jewish member of the British parliament.”
“1891: The British Labour Leader (newspaper) makes the following statement on the subject of the Rothschilds,
“This blood-sucking crew has been the cause of untold mischief and misery in Europe during the present century, and has piled up its prodigious wealth chiefly through fomenting wars between States which ought never to have quarrelled.
Whenever there is trouble in Europe, wherever rumours of war circulate and men’s minds are distraught with fear of change and calamity you may be sure that a hook-nosed Rothschild is at his games somewhere near the region of the disturbance.”
Comments like this worry the Rothschilds and towards the end of the 1800’s they purchase Reuters news agency so they can have some control of the media. Source
In his book, “None Dare Call It Conspiracy” (1973), Gary Allen states,
“One major reason for the historical blackout on the role of the international bankers in political history is the Rothschilds were Jewish…The Jewish members of the conspiracy have used an organisation called The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) as an instrument to try and convince everyone that any mention of the Rothschilds and their allies is an attack on all Jews.
In this way they have stifled almost all honest scholarship on international bankers and made the subject taboo within universities.
Any individual or book exploring this subject is immediately attacked by hundreds of ADL communities all over the country. The ADL has never let the truth or logic interfere with its highly professional smear jobs…
Actually, nobody has a right to be more angry at the Rothschild clique than their fellow Jews… The Rothschild empire helped finance Adolf Hitler.”
By 1868, Benjamin Disraeli had become the first Jewish Prime Minister of Britain.
“Jews, like other religious minorities, received equal rights over a century ago, beginning with formal Jewish Emancipation in 1858, at which point Lionel de Rothschild was allowed to sit in the House of Commons after the law restricting the oath of office to Christians was changed, the ministry said.”
Source: Extracts from “Jewish World” by Itamar Eichner (published 09.11.2006).
In more recent times, the Thatcherite government’s dismantling of British industry in the 1980s and beyond was manipulated by the House of Rothschild:
“N. M. Rothschild & Sons advise the British government on the privatisation of British Gas. They subsequently advise the British government on virtually all of their other privatisations of state owned assets including: British Steel; British Coal; all the British regional electricity boards; and all the British regional water boards.
A British MP heavily involved in these privatisations is future Chancellor of the Exchequer, Norman Lamont, a former Rothschild banker.” source
“It is quite extraordinary the number of privatisation troughs that N. M. Rothschild has got its snout into: British Telecom, Britoil, British Gas, Royal Ordnance, British Airways, Rolls Royce, British Airports Authority, British Petroleum, British steel, water, regional electricity, Northern Ireland electricity, British coal, the list goes on and on. The chancellor, Norman Lamont, and the economic secretary, Anthony Nelson both used to work for N. M. Rothschild. ” — Private Eye on Thatcherism, April 1993
All of which amounts to the inescapable fact that the ‘Government’ of Britain is controlled by the hidden hand of the ‘Money Changers’, who operate through the Council on Foreign Relations and other controlled offshoots such as the Fabian Party.
The Rothschild dominated agencies of control.
Think the Rothschilds have nothing to do with the Labour Party? Think again: the spymaster of Mi5, the double agent, Victor Rothschild, sat in the Lords on the Labour benches:
“In 1937, he inherited his title from his uncle, Walter Rothschild, who was the 2nd Baron Rothschild and thereafter sat as a Labour party peer in the House of Lords. During the Second World War, he was recruited by MI5 and was awarded the George medal for his work.” Source: www.maccabi.com.au/News/283/A-history-of-Jewish-first-class-cricketers.cfm
Our so-called ‘culture’ has been controlled from the ‘top’ down, infected by a variety of social engineering projects (viruses), many of which have sprung from the Tavistock Institute, to such a degree that we live in times of widespread degeneracy and under a yoke of financial enslavement. It has recently been termed ‘weaponised anthropology’, or the engineering of mankind’s psychology.
Rest assured, whichever ‘party’ gets elected to ‘government’ on 08 June, the result will have been engineered, with the voting rigged in strict accordance with the wishes of the aforementioned ‘controllers’. The not-so-hidden hand of the House of Rothschild.
The greatest swindle of all time has been perpetuated by these parasitic deceivers; for over 200 years they have held guard to the hidden mechanics of the creation of a fiat currency system. A fiat currency that is issued by their licenced mandarins as debt, a fiat currency that is printed in note form by the private Bank of England (and every other so-called ‘central bank’ in the world).
However, the game is up. The claim made by the Rothschild Bank in London during the American Civil War (which they funded) in a letter to its New York agents that:
“The few who understand the system will either be so interested in its profits, or so dependent on its favours that there will be no opposition from that class, while on the other hand, the great body of people, mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous advantages that capital derives from the system, will bear its burdens without complaint, and perhaps without even suspecting the system is inimical to their interests.”
is as hollow now as it ever was.
Thanks to the likes of Professor Richard Werner, the facts are becoming ever clearer:
Interviewer: “You’re firmly of the view that banks create money out of thin air?”
Richard Werner (RW): “ Yes, I’ve produced the first empirical studies to prove that in the 5 thousand year history of banking. Banks don’t take deposits and banks don’t lend money.
“So what is a deposit? A deposit is not actually a deposit; it’s not a bailment, it’s not held in custody. At law, the word deposit is meaningless.
The law courts and various judgements have made it very clear: if you give your money to a bank, even though it’s called a deposit, this money is simply a loan to the bank. So, there is no such thing as deposit: it’s a loan to the bank.
“So, banks borrow from the public – that much we’ve established.
“What about lending? Surely, they’re lending money? No, they don’t. Banks don’t lend money. Again, at law, they’re in the business of purchasing securities. That’s it. So you say, don’t confuse me with all that legalese, I want a loan. Fine, here’s the loan contract, here’s the offer letter and you sign.
“At law, it’s very clear: you have issued a security, namely a promissory note and that bank is going to purchase that – that’s what’s happened.”
RT – “ Put it in layman’s terms – what does that mean?”
RW “ it means that what the bank is doing is very different from what it presents to the public that it’s doing.
“How does this fit together?
“You say, fine, the bank purchases my promissory note but how do I get my money? I don’t care about the details, I want my money.
“The bank will say, well, you’ll find it in your account. That would be technically correct. If they say we’ll transfer it to your account, that’s wrong because no money is transferred at all, from anywhere inside the bank or outside the bank. Why? Because what we call a deposit is simply the bank’s record of its debt to the public. Now, it also owes you money and its record of the money it owes you is what you think you are getting as money and that’s all it is.
“And that is how the banks create the money supply; the money supply consists to 97% of bank deposits and these are created out of nothing by banks when they ‘lend’ because they invent fictitious customer deposits. Why?
“They simply re-state, slightly incorrectly in accounting terms, that there’s an account payable liability arising out of the loan contract which is your promissory note as a customer deposit but nobody has deposited any money. I wonder how the FCA deals with this because in the financial sector, you’re supposed to not mislead your customers.”
“The House of Rothschild is really at the top of the pyramid of power. They are behind the New World Order and the complete domination of the world agenda. They are behind the European Union and the Euro and they are behind the idea of a North American Union and the Amero. They are controlling all of the world’s secret services and their private army is NATO.” Source
The fact is that no polipuppet, whether it be Corbyn, May, Macron or Trump, will go anywhere near this issue of the fraud of money creation and the over-arching control of the people by way of the indentured servitude. The referenced Financial Service Authority (FSA) is as toothless an entity as the CPS which has recently declined to prosecute the Tory polipuppets who committed demonstrable election fraud in 2015. The system is rigged from top to bottom but, as long as the people are mired in the false belief that the banks are owed money and that there is a national or private ‘debt’ to be paid, it will continue to limp on.
The Rothschilds’ Bank of International Settlements (BIS) – used to exonerate its members from any criminality.
However, given the fact that the fiat money system the Rothschilds’ control is based on the sweat equity of the people via the ‘promise to pay’ and that there is nothing to prevent the people from creating their own currencies and lines of credit (as evidenced by the rise of Bitcoin), its continued dominance is precarious.
It is a system of control that is only as strong as its weakest links, of which there are many.
______________________________________________
Acknowledgments to the excellent work of Richard Werner and the HumansAreFree website for its comprehensive documentation of the Rothschild history.
Special acknowledgments: to long-time supporter, Jan Bogusz, who passed away last month, David R for his continued sponsorship and Erik S for his donation last month. Thank-you, gents, it’s most appreciated.
Anyone who wishes to support the work of RM is kindly directed to the donate button on this page.
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
