Expressed in 36 minutes.
It is certainly a bold title but, on balance, it is a decent attempt to compress the subject of our and humanity’s financial enslavement at the hands of the Jewish financiers who have been exploiting the goy for a lot longer than that.
The discourse is, naturally, wide-ranging but the focus remains on the One Ring to Control it All.
Nevertheless, I do like a challenge and in this week’s discourse, I wander round Shipley Park and Mapperley Lake and delve into the fraud of the Jewish financiers that, along with other factors, has seen them unceremoniously expelled from at least 109 countries down the centuries:
As the RogueCast shows at the start, history is not linear but more of a series of ripples caused by those events that are documented. We are going round in a spiral and that necessarily involves the repetition of events – when I talk about the inevitability of such recurrences, it automatically means that it is a matter of when and not if they happen.
Some will immediately and falsely claim that this is anti-semitic but we are at that point right now when I would rather listen to the warnings of my ancestors than believe the lies about them that are promulgated by the Zio-Controllers and possessors of this false construct.
There is much that has been hidden from us and that which we have been fed as actual history, is invariably a construct of deep deception, designed to besmirch our ancestors and our former selves by the usual suspects.
For instance, how many of us know of the two clauses in the Magna Carta that specifically reference the avaricious Jewish financiers and the problems they were causing to the native population?
The original text of the Magna Carta (1215) is in Medieval Latin. The two clauses that reference Jews (using the term “Judaeis” or “Judeis”, meaning “Jews”) are Clauses 10 and 11 in the modern numbering system.
Here are the relevant original Latin clauses (from reliable scholarly sources, such as parallel editions and transcriptions of the 1215 charter):
Clause 10
Si quis mutuo ceperit aliquid a Judeis, plus vel minus, et moriatur antequam debitum illud solvatur, debitum non usuret quamdiu heres fuerit infra etatem, de quocumque teneat; et si debitum illud inciderit in manus nostras, nos non capiemus nisi catallum contentum in carta.
(English translation: If anyone has taken a loan from Jews, great or small, and dies before the debt is paid, the debt shall not bear interest so long as the heir is under age, of whomsoever he may hold; and if the debt falls into our hands, we will take nothing except the principal contained in the charter/bond.)
Clause 11
Et si quis moriatur, et debitum debeat Judeis, uxor ejus habeat dotem suam, et nichil reddat de debito illo; et si liberi ipsius defuncti qui fuerint infra etatem remanserint, provideantur eis necessaria secundum tenementum quod fuerit defuncti, et de residuo solvatur debitum, salvo servicio dominorum; simili modo fiat de debitis que debentur aliis quam Judeis.
(English translation: And if anyone dies indebted to Jews, his wife shall have her dower and pay nothing of that debt; and if children of the deceased remain under age, necessaries shall be provided for them according to the tenement of the deceased, and the debt shall be paid from the residue, saving the service due to lords; in like manner let it be done with debts due to others than Jews.)
The text is drawn from surviving exemplifications (such as those in the British Library and other archives) and standard scholarly editions.
Note that medieval Latin spelling can vary slightly across copies (e.g., “Judeis” vs. “Judaeis”), but the content is consistent.Yes, the Magna Carta of 1215 was originally written in Medieval Latin.
This was the standard language for legal and official documents in England at the time, as well as for religious, scholarly, and governmental purposes across much of medieval Europe.
The surviving original exemplifications (contemporary copies issued in 1215) — such as those held at the British Library, Lincoln Castle, and Salisbury Cathedral — are all in Latin, written in cursive script on parchment with abbreviations for efficiency.
As previously noted, “under Common Law, a money, land or possession claim will be dismissed in the event that the original and verified as true note of indebtedness (a Deed of Mortgage being a prime example) cannot be produced.
This is why, in the mid-1200s, Simon De Montfort of Leicester (left) deployed an armed militia to seize the strong boxes of the Jewish financiers and destroy any and all original debt instruments. Without these shetars and debt notes, everybody knew that there could be no claim.”
This financial enslavement is and has always been intolerable to the native peoples of Europe and America – usury was banned in most countries for a very good reason and, as history shows us, it will be soon be abolished again.
Financial malpractice is always the stranglehold that causes the most anger – it is a self-righteous anger because it is nothing less than a form of enslavement whose shackles are invisible until they become visible.
Most people are blind to the levels of contempt that the goyim are held in. It is but another perverted form of false moral superiority over humanity, as practised by the Talmudists, the Islamists and, of course, the Freemasons.
Given the recent revelations of the Epstein Files, with all its depravities, including ritual child abuse, trafficking, financial malfeasance, cannibalism and any and all perversions, it should come as no surprise that these types of gross satanic behaviour are not new:
Blood Libel Accusations in Medieval England (12th-13th Centuries)
Blood libels, were accusations that Jews ritually murdered Christians (often children) to use their blood in religious practices, originated in England in the 12th century and spread during the 13th. Here are some key examples from the period around the Magna Carta (1215):
1144: William of Norwich – The first recorded blood libel in Europe occurred in Norwich, England, where Jews were accused of kidnapping, torturing, and crucifying a 12-year-old Christian boy named William during Easter. His body was found in the woods with stab wounds, and a monk named Thomas of Monmouth later promoted the story, claiming it was a ritual reenactment of Jesus’s crucifixion. It led to widespread suspicion and later violence.
1168: Harold of Gloucester – In Gloucester, Jews were accused of the ritual murder of a boy named Harold, whose body was allegedly found mutilated. This case echoed the Norwich incident and contributed to growing anti-Jewish sentiment.
1181: Robert of Bury St. Edmunds – Jews in Bury St. Edmunds were blamed for the death of a young boy named Robert, claimed to have been killed for ritual purposes. This led to attacks on the local Jewish community.
1183: Bristol – Similar accusations arose in Bristol, where Jews were charged with ritually murdering a Christian child, further spreading the libel motif.
1189-1190: Anti-Jewish uprisings in London, York, and Other Cities – During the coronation of Richard I and the Third Crusade, blood libel rumours contributed to massacres. In York, around 150 Jews were killed after seeking refuge in Clifford’s Tower, amid accusations of ritual crimes and general suspicion against Jewish people.
1235: Norwich (Additional Case) – Another blood libel in Norwich accused Jews of murdering a child, building on the earlier William case.
1255: Little Saint Hugh of Lincoln – In Lincoln, Jews were accused of kidnapping, torturing, and crucifying an 8-year-old boy named Hugh. King Henry III intervened, leading to the execution of 18 Jews and the expulsion of others. This case inspired Chaucer’s “The Prioress’s Tale” and became one of the most infamous.
These incidents often resulted in arrests, executions, and expulsions, culminating in the total expulsion of Jews from England in 1290 by Edward I.
___________________________
Thank you for your attention. Should you be appreciative of my essays and RogueCasts, then please consider chucking a few quid into the coffers via the BuyMeACoffee button and/or take out a paid subscription at my Substack page, where you will be the first to receive my work. Cheers
_____________________________
Footnote: it turns out that a large percentage of those who claim to be Jewish are lactose intolerant, which is the likely reason Lord Nathaniel Rothschild was so keen to subvert the goodness of raw milk:
