The Alternative Media Menagerie
The danger of throwing pebbles in a glass house is a suitable metaphor for those fringe magnets who inhabit the snow dome that is the alternative media.
Menagerie noun
a collection of wild animals kept in captivity for exhibition.
a strange or diverse collection of people or things: some other specimen in the television menagerie.
ORIGIN
late 17th century: from French ménagerie, from ménage (see ménage).
Fringe magnets is a term invented by Dom Waterson of the Sheep Farm website and podcast and it means those popular public figures who fret about on the ‘alternative’ stage set of the ‘truth-seekers’. Unfortunately, the stage is populated by a menagerie of statists who are masquerading as free-thinkers.
The Curious Tale of Miri Finch
The menagerie is, of course a reference to the factual existence of financier-state sponsorship of those limited hangouts and agent provocateurs which and who exist in order to corral people into echo chambers where the truth and the facts are sidelined and the participants are led in a circular dance that never goes anywhere and never offers remedies, with the overall effect being to splinter the opposition and to sow doubt in the minds of the public. All of which is its purpose.
In the 1968 film, The News Benders the main character states that 92% of the population have no idea that the news is composed of fake events and falsities of all descriptions. The rest, he says, “work for us”.
The state asset, Marianna Spring is an example of a woman who, though she operates in the lame-stream sewers of the BBC Propaganda Pumping Station, throws around a heap of pebbles as she fact-checks the output of those that the military-industrial complex label conspiracy theorists. The hopeless irony being that she works within an organisation whose modus operandi is the production and dissemination of false narratives, inaccurate information, woke nonsense as well the employment of a plethora of nonces whose slimy trails score across the entire dung-heap of its fetid output.
Never, ever, does she fact check the disinformation that the corporation was created to spew into the minds of the unthinking masses and which it does on a daily basis. I would love to see her critique The News Benders as it is, perhaps a classic example of revelation of the method.
I have previously posited that James Delingpole is one of these types in so far as he has been set up precisely to engage in this type of operation. James loves the shekel, that is true, but is it unreasonable to suggest that he deliberately steers clear of discussing, in any real depth, the nature of the financial fraud and false money system we are having to negotiate as we journey through this shit parade of lies?
Miri Finch is a woman who writes articles on a variety of ‘conspiracy’ issues and she has a sizeable following on Substack. I previously critiqued her article in which claimed Richard D Hall is a deep-state asset and that the Manchester Arena False Flag of 2017 was part of an elaborate, even ingenious plan to curtail freedom of speech. My conclusion was that her writing is largely fallacious and full of airy nothings or empty rhetoric.
Her reliance on empty rhetoric was also clearly demonstrated on a recent podcast with Iain Davis in which she attempted to explain how and why she sees Hall as a state asset – this is from the opening segment to the podcast and is a direct quote of her explanation,
“there are people who believe, as is their right, that the bombing was real and that the victims were injured in that bomb in the way that they said they were and that’s those peoples’ beliefs and if these people have really been injured in the way that they say they have and you’re accusing them of faking, isn’t that completely unacceptable?
No, it’s not unacceptable at all, it’s totally acceptable and not just acceptable but the basis of the judicial system which assumes everyone is innocent until proven guilty. So, whenever you make an accusation of anyone, always the initial assumption is well they are innocent until there’s enough evidence to show either way. So, I said, yes of course, we must accuse potentially innocent people because how do we otherwise get to the truth. We don’t know what the truth is, that’s why (intelligible) … we’re making accusations, so, we’ll just have to go where the evidence takes us.
Erm, now, with, erm, particular people, Martin and Eve Hibbert, … I do think they are victims of something, I just don’t think it’s a bomb, erm, so if we just shut down the conversation, completely and say they’re victims, they’re disabled, they’re vulnerable so they’re beyond reproach, can’t ask any questions of them, then we’re never going to unravel what’s really going on. So, you know, whatever’s really happened to them, we have to risk making false accusations, have to risk being wrong, maybe, you know, apologise for being wrong, but that’s the only way to get to the truth.”
“I think they set up the counter narrative via Richard D Hall. The big red flag to me is the amount of media publicity he gets and it’s not just since [the trial]”
Now, Miri’s schtick and oft-repeated adage is, “if you know the name, they’re in the game.”
By which she means that anyone whose name appears in the media is a player in the mind-control and psy-ops which are perpetrated against the public.
Unfortunately, it is a rather simplistic and very fragile tag-line upon which to hang an ethos or any kind of logic or reasoning.
She states that Richard D Hall is in the ‘game’ because he has been referenced in the lamestream media over the Manchester Arena false flag and what his book revealed, then he must be an actor, whose modus operandi is all scripted and that he must be a security services asset. By that ‘reasoning’, the harassment he received at his market stall in Merthyr Tydfil by Mariana Spring and the subsequent BBC Panorama hit piece on him were all an act, created for the express purpose of demonising ‘conspiracy theorists’ and creating judicial precedents that all serve to curtail freedom of expression.
She is, if I have understood it correctly, claiming that the real controllers are always behind the scenes, anonymously directing the actors who take on the roles assigned to them in the geo-political realm. In this sense, she opines that Hall is a state asset or useful idiot.
If we follow this line of reasoning, then the Crown House of Rothschild is but a front-operation, even though it is a name that is not widely recognised. There is an element of truth in this as the World Crime Syndicate website substantiates.
For the purposes of this essay, let’s take it on face value and state that Miri is correct: that we only know or recognise the names of those who are deeply embedded in the never-ending game of hide and seek and that it is the unnamed controllers who hide in the shadows that are the real initiators of the oh-so-cunning movements of the chess pieces around the geo-political stage.
Now, let’s apply her adage to Mir-i-am herself.
She has stated on the Sheep Farm podcast that her father was employed at Keele University and that that is where she was brought up. But who is her father? How many of us have heard of him?
His name John Sloboda and he is a recipient of the Order of the British Empire and, thus, firmly one of the elite.
His OBE was ‘awarded’ for his service – a service into the uses of music in the realm of psychology, of its use as a tool of mind control.
This is what his Wikipedia entry states about him,
Is it not interesting to note that Sloboda was the Executive Director of the Oxford Research Group, of which it is stated,
“The Remote Warfare Programme was established in January 2018, based around the Remote Control project of the Network for Social Change, which had been hosted by ORG since 2013.
It analyses shifts in military engagements, focusing on Western states’ increasing focus on working through local and regional partner militaries in places such as the Middle East and Africa.
As part of this, they examine current developments in military technology and doctrine such as cyber-warfare, unmanned weapons systems (such as unmanned aerial vehicles), private military and security contractors, and special operations forces.” source
Note the link with the Network for Social Change and its involvement in
“cyber-warfare, private military and security contractors and special operations forces”
is it not the case that each and every cited example of these limited hangouts is engaging, perhaps not directly, but substantially in each of these areas?
Are any of these players to be trusted?
Does this mean Miriam’s father, John Sloboda, is in the game, as she likes to put it? Maybe. In any event, he is a bona fide member of the establishment on the simple basis he has been awarded an OBE for his service(s). I am also reminded at this point of another accurate and comical expression used by Dom of Sheep Farm, in reference to the family lineage of those who ponce about in various state-sponsored roles and whose families are firmly ‘established’ to the point where there is never any ordinary line of work to which they are associated,
No Plumbers Allowed
Incidentally, and for those who may be curious, neither Dom and Christian or myself are from establishment families; a suggestion which makes me chuckle as I write it and which is easily dispelled by the fact their father was a butcher and small-holder and mine was an engineer, both heralding from Huddersfield, where, interestingly, Miri Finch now resides.
The use of popular music as a mind control technique is well-documented and one only needs to listen to researchers like Mike Williams and read the work of Dave McGowan and Mark Devlin to see how sophisticated this Tavistock-based deployment of music as a psychological tool has been, with the Beatles being perhaps the finest example of its success.
There are numerous links to Sloboda’s work and whilst I have no interest in researching his academic papers, others may be inclined to do so.
If we are to apply Miri’s tenet then does it not follow that – because I have never previously heard of her father, who is a recipient of an OBE and other establishment accolades – that he may well be one of the psychological influencers/manipulators who exist in the shadows and control those ‘names’ she states being in the game?
And what of Miriam herself?
The link to Companies House suggests that she is also a player in the game. Quite how and why she has 3 separate (now dissolved) companies of which she was director is equally suggestive that she too is a player in the “game”.
It is interesting to note that in March, 2021 she joined a “consultant team” at a legal firm as “as a Legal Assistant (Non-Solicitor).”
“The Jonathan Lea Network is now a full service firm of solicitors that employs senior and junior solicitors, trainee solicitors, paralegals and administration staff who all work from a modern open plan office in Haywards Heath. This close-knit retained team is enhanced by a trusted network of specialist consultant solicitors who work remotely and, where relevant, combine seamlessly with the central team.” Source
Gven the fact that no paralegal (like Miri), solicitor, lawyer, attorney or member of the judiciary in the captured UK plc knows anything about the Law, it should come as no surprise that her ‘opinions’ on matters of Law are woolly and inaccurate as can be demonstrated by the above quotation from Iain Davis’ interview with her.
Acrylic Dressed Up as Wool.
Much of what she asserts is as woolly as her beanie (which is most likely acrylic),
“as a non-lawyer there can sometimes be limits to what I can achieve. However, now with the leverage of an established law firm I can work with, my contributions should have considerably more impact, and I’m very excited indeed about what the Jonathan Lea Network and I can achieve together.”
Empty rhetoric, which upon close inspection, amounts to the square root of fook all.
In any event, one does not take up a paid position at a legal firm without satisfying the employment criteria – they would not appoint her if there was any controversy or doubt about her being a loose cannon. She is evidently regarded as a ‘safe pair of hands’, as demonstrated by the firm’s endorsement of her and her appearances on Delingpole’s and Davis’ podcasts, as well as that of the other disinformation pedlar, Aisling (Whatshername).
Davis has appeared on these platforms and even interviewed Miri on his podcast. Why bother with either bint is my question – what purpose can be served by engaging with these women? Why not have me on to discuss the reasons why Judge Steyn’s order is lawfully VOID and what that actually means? Why piss about with a pair of lasses who are manifestly puffed up on their own empty rhetoric?
It is also worth considering what the game is that Iain Davis is playing. For instance, let us take the adage that signs and symbols rule the realm.
Davis’ logo is a strange one: the smiley face and this is very telling.
The inventor of the smiley face logo has made great financial gains from its prevalence.
Its usage began in the 1950s and was dominant in both the controlled hippy movement of the 1960s and the replay that was the acid house of the late 1980s.
There is also William Ramsay’s work on the phenomenon of the Smiley Face Killers.
Notice the blood through the eye – why would Davis choose it as his logo, given the negative associations it has with music and as a symbol for mind control?
The blood smear reminds me of the staged ‘assassination’ attempt on Trump, in which he rises up from behind the podium with a smear across his cheek. The fact that it was, going by the recurring shoe-motif, a freemasonic ritual of some nature may suggest that Davis’ intention behind choosing that particular symbol is also freemasonic in origin.
Delingpole also professes a fondness for the smiley face,
“he spent some time wearing smiley T-shirts and taking Ecstasy. “I think my Ecstasy chapter is one of the best bits of the book,” he says. He’s right. It’s lovingly nostalgic about the club scene during the late 1980s, as well as a savage indictment of it. He tells us about the “warm, beatific smiles” and the “beautiful faces radiating happiness” on the dance floor, as well as the “poo-scented tailwind of the swing doors” in the dreadful lavatories, and the terrible malaise when the drugs wear off.” source
I would also add that Davis has establishment connections too – Delingpole, UK (MI5) Column, and, “Iain’s work is regularly featured by a number of outlets including The OffGuardian, Lew Rockwell, Technocracy News & Trends and The Corbett Report.”
Each of which, I would posit, are establishment-controlled ‘alternative’ limited hangouts.
Whilst I may be wrong in regard to some of these assertions, I can reassure readers that I am not of their ilk. As stated, my dad was, for forty years, an engineer at David Brown Gears in Lockwood, Huddersfield and neither my paternal line (family name, Kaye) or my maternal line (family name, Thompson) contain any establishment lineage.
Thus, it can be safely said that I am not chucking stones around in a glass menagerie.
On the subject of establishment families, Delingpole was educated at the exclusive and expensive Malvern College and Oxford University and had a career in the mainstream media. His cosiness with Miriam, his glaring omissions on the fake financial system and his blatant connectedness with the establishment all point to him being an establishment-sanctioned ring-master in the interminable realm of the limited hangouts. After all, if we know the name, are they not in the game? And, does that not account for their large audiences?
This may well go some way to explaining how and why he jumped to the defence of Miriam after he had initially shared my article exposing her fallacies and empty rhetoric.
Remember too that each of these referenced commentators have thousands of followers on social media, that they have only recently come to the fore and that, by comparison, I have very few. To be elevated so quickly to such levels of attention is suspicious as we are in an electronic panopticon in which those who are genuine are not permitted to have large followings; their work is suppressed via censorship, the statistics are manipulated – the game is rigged and only the state-sanctioned players are ‘allowed’ audience access of the size these individuals have.
Whilst I get no pleasure of any kind as I write this and would prefer not to examine the grubby antics of these types, it is important to air these matters on the simple basis that the deceptions and frauds of these individuals need exposing.
As one commentator put it, it can be safely stated that I am not on Miriam’s Christmas card list. It is also fair to state that I will not be receiving an invitation to be a guest on the Delingpod.
As always, a huge thank you to Dave, Steve and David R for their generous appreciation of my discourses and essays. Should you be able, please chuck a few quid in the pot via the Buy Me a Coffee button and/or take out a subscription to my Substack pages. if you like, you can also support me by taking out a paid subscription which will grant you ‘first dibs’ on my output.
All the very best, Michael.
