False fears are invariably predicated on lies and,
Whilst God Loves a Trier,
The Devil Loves a Liar
The accompanying Rogue Cast can be viewed here at Substack.
“Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil”
is another maxim that has resonated with me from all those decades ago when I first heard it, most probably from my dear and departed mother, Jean.
It is interesting to me that, for some at least, it appears to fall on stony ground, even within the confines of my own family.
Now, why might that be the case?
Could it be that some are simply closed off to the Truth? I would posit that is manifestly the case.
Whilst I readily delve into those matters that some may regard as taboo or, alternatively, as beyond the powers of their cognisance, I have to admit that the false ‘god’ of this world is the demiurge and its influence is so vast and so pervasive that its tentacles simply squeeze the individual within its false grasp to the point where he is consumed with fear.
That fear is invariably engineered, after all is it not the case that we come into the world in a fear-less state of being? In fact, there exist agencies of the fake state whose very intention is to generate fear, as exemplified by SAGE, whose notorious lies were so prevalent during the Divoc 91 psy-op.
However, when the facts of the matter are revealed, then those fears disappear as readily as a fart into the wind.
‘False fears’ is an expression I first came into contact with as a youth when studying the poetry of John Donne who wrote,
“True and false fears let us refrain, Let us love nobly, and live, and add again
Years and years unto years, till we attain To write threescore: this is the second of our reign.”
― John Donne (1572-1631), The Complete English Poems
Again, it is to be noted how often eternal Truth is expressed via the medium of fiction and/or that of poetry.
In his playful poem of seduction, The Flea, Donne again uses the expression, albeit as part of a literary conceit by which he hopes to get into the knickers of the woman he is attempting to seduce,
Cruel and sudden, hast thou since Purpled thy nail, in blood of innocence?
Wherein could this flea guilty be,
Except in that drop which it sucked from thee?
Yet thou triumph’st, and say’st that thou
Find’st not thy self, nor me the weaker now; ‘
Tis true; then learn how false fears be: Just so much honor, when thou yield’st to me,
Will waste, as this flea’s death took life from thee.
Later in life, Donne became a ‘man of the cloth’ and his poetry reflected his change,
As he that fears God fears nothing else, so he that sees God sees everything else.
Wherefore, it is incumbent upon the individual to apply reason – the logos – to any and all of the psy-ops that are specifically designed to engender false fears within the uncritical listener/viewer.
Thank you for reading. Should you be feeling appreciative, then please chuck a few quid in the pot, via the Buy Me a Coffee button, leave a comment and I will get back to you.
My work can also be read on Substack, which, at least as far as I can tell, appears to be a home to free speech and provides writers and podcasters with an opportunity to be tipped a few coins for their efforts.
How on earth did I come to this? An overview of a journey that began in Huddersfield and led to me taking on the One Ring That Controls it All. Six years on and the issues are still pertinent.
Part 1: The Royal Rejection of god by the queen and her men.
“No enactment of man can be considered law unless it conforms to the law of God.” Sir William Blackstone.
Recently, I’ve been considering the nature of my relation to god, particularly in regard to natural law and the truth or logos (as in the word of god). Last Saturday morning, I had a encounter with an elderly gentlemen who turned up at the door as a paid-up member of the cult of Jehovah (viz. a ‘Jehovah’s Witness’). I explained to him how I have never had any urge to belong to an organised religion, that, nevertheless, I had been christened and that I do believe, in a very practical sense, that Christ consciousness is the antidote to the evil that self-evidently dominates the world at this time.
One can stand in truth and light or one may choose the opposite, to lurk in the shadowy confines of state treachery, financial fraud, fake news and all that which stands in opposition to the truth.
To consciously stand under natural law and in the truth may be termed christ consciousness.
The fact that our world is contaminated by the lies and the frauds of those who speak them, as perpetrated by an inverted mainstream media, means it can be asserted that we are unavoidably bound by natural law to express the truth (the word of god – logos) in the face of myriad lies (the anti-christ: a state of being wherein one chooses to lie or cause harm to gain advantage over others).
It has long been my conviction that we are here to take action in the physical realms – ‘in this world but not of it’ – that this is a genuine spiritual journey through the material world and that anyone who is ignoring the facts of our enslavement or, in turn, uses any form of Kabbalistic Inversion to mislead or harm others (whether knowingly or otherwise) is, by way of his (in)actions, engaged in satanic practice. Thus, any action, whether it be in support of or straightforward compliance to the tyranny that exists all around us may be termed a manifestation of the anti-christ.
The foregoing is the gist of what I expressed to my doorstep visitor.
The witness’s response was to reach for his i-phone (I kid you not) and quote a couple of sections from the bible – one about Jesus’ authority over the world and the other, interestingly, on the temptation of Christ by the Devil. I feel compelled to say that I enjoyed my conversation with this old boy – his smile and the warmth in his blue eyes spoke of a connection that rose between us, no matter how fleetingly. It mattered not from whence each of us had reached our understandings, we were, in those moments – for want of a more appropriate expression – united in christ (consciousness). We had established a common ground The encounter ended with us each musing over the distinct possibility that we are living in the ‘end times’: that it is the end of satan(ism). In that moment, we had individually and jointly, reached a level of trust: trust that the truth will out.
The queen and all her men.
By contrast to that which I trust in, I have a long held a deep mistrust of the British monarchy that has sat easily alongside my perception that their reign is fraudulent. For a number of well-founded reasons, often instinctual, I have steered a course well-away from its tentacles.
Occasionally, however, I have come within its purview. The first example was when I, along with some 400 other junior-school pupils stood on New Hey Road, Oakes, near Huddersfield, to wave at the queen as she drove past en route to open Scammonden Dam and the M62 motorway, some 4 miles north-west of where we stood. It is fair to state I was non-plussed by the experience. Of course, this flag waving was not some natural childish upswell of support for the monarch: it had been organised by the school staff.
The next instance was when I joined the Scouts and swore an oath to God and the Queen:
The Scout Promise
“On my honour I promise that I will do my best—
To do my duty to God and the King* (or to God and my Country)
To help other people at all times and
To obey the Scout Law.”
*’queen’ in my instance.
To me, it was a promise that seemed (and still does) a good one to make, particularly for a young lad of a christian persuasion, as in my case. However, the inclusion of the queen jarred with me. I simply did not comprehend it. I had no sense of how or why this individual could be taken as a ‘ruler’ over others.
The royal wedding of 1981 was easily avoided by way of a cycling trip to Scarborough with 3 friends: the closest we came to it on the day was when we stopped off at a pub at the bottom of Sutton Bank for some refreshment and it was being broadcast on a television behind the bar.
Speaking of which, the obsequious nature of the media coverage of the sinister soap opera known a the monarchy has always been so nauseating to me that I would walk out of the room should it appear on the goggle box and I had no means of switching it off.
In 1997, the death of Diana released an outpouring of collectively-induced fake grieving that I also steered well-clear of. One strange outcome (or should that be ‘happy occurrence’?) of which was that all the roads were completely clear throughout the day on the Sunday immediately following her demise, which made my move, on that day, from Nottingham to Leicester a hastle-free one.
On 30th March, 2002, one of the fake royals known ‘affectionately’ (as the sycophantic media would have it) as the ‘queen mother’ died. On 1st April, two days later, I was at a forgettable football game between Huddersfield Town and Oldham Athletic. However, to my great chagrin and disbelief, it was announced that before the game kicked off there would be minute’s silence to mark her passing. Of the 14,343 spectators in the ground, I must have been just about the only who did not stand up when the moment came. It’s the unquestioning deference that I just don’t get, particularly when it happens en-masse. Such collective doffing of one’s cap is an anachronism that may well be explained by the levels of media propaganda that the population is subjected to.
Naturally, I will be avoiding the latest wedding episode of the ‘royal’ Bread and Circus show, as scheduled for later this month.
In 2009, I renounced my citizenship of the UK, by way of Notice to the woman acting as the Queen, the nominal head of the ‘Crown’. In an accompanying missive, I took the opportunity to renounce my childhood allegiance to her as made in the scout ‘promise’ on the basis that she had failed in her moral obligations to the people to whom she had sworn an oath.
As far as I am concerned, even if the woman known as ‘Elizabeth Windsor’ did truly have a divine right to reign over us, she has forfeited that right by completely failing to fulfil the promise of her coronation oath to maintain God’s law for and on behalf of the people of these lands and, further, is entirely complicit in the act of treason by which the isles of Britain were assigned membership of the reich known as the European Union.
As the acclaimed William Blackstone observed:
“I PROCEED next to the duties, incumbent on the king by our constitution; in consideration of which duties his dignity and prerogative are established by the laws of the land: it being a maxim in the law, that protection and subjection are reciprocal.
[…] THE principal duty of the king is, to govern his people according to law. Nec regibus infinita aut libera potestas [kingly power is neither free nor unlimited], was the constitution of our German ancestors on the continent.*
And this is not only consonant to the principles of nature, of liberty, of reason, and of society, but has always been esteemed an express part of the common law of England, even when prerogative was at the highest.
“The king,” says Bracton, who wrote under Henry III, “ought not to be subject to man, but to God, and to the law; for the law makes the king. Let the king therefore render to the law, what the law has invested in him with regard to others; dominion, and power: for he is not truly king, where will and pleasure rules, and not the law.” source
And again:
“the king also has a superior, namely God, and also the law, by which he was made a king.”
It is to be noted that the Molmutine laws, being of more ancient origin than said Germanic laws, are those upon which the common law of the British Isles were established. More can be read here regarding the subject.
In this context, we turn to the terms of the contract she thereby established with the people through the Oath of Coronation, the terms of which were presented to her thus:
“The archbishop or bishop shall say, Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the people of this kingdom of England, and the dominions thereto belonging, according to the statutes in parliament agreed on, and the laws and customs of the same?
The king or queen shall say, I solemnly promise so to do.
“Archbishop or bishop. Will you to your power cause law and justice, in mercy, to be executed in all your judgments?
King or queen. I will.
“Archbishop of bishop. Will you to the utmost of your power maintain the laws of God, the true profession of the gospel, and the protestant reformed religion established by the law? And will you preserve unto the bishops and clergy of this realm, and to the churches committed to their charge, all such rights and privileges as by law do or shall appertain unto them, or any of them?
King or queen. All this I promise to do.
“After this the king or queen, laying his or her hand upon the holy gospels, shall say, The things which I have here before promised I will perform and keep: so help me God. And then shall kiss the book.”
By swearing thus upon her oath, Elizabeth contractually agreed to the incontestable fact that god’s law, as delivered in and through the bible, stands as the supreme law of the lands known as Britain.
The question naturally arises: has she upheld the terms of her contract with the peoples of these lands?
Part 2: TGBMS: at the vanguard of the resistance to tyranny.
Of course, it naturally follows that the all-enveloping ‘Crown’ and ‘Her Majesty’s Courts’ are also up-to-their-necks in The Great British Mortgage Swindle. There is a scene in the documentary in which Remi (my former housemate and associate) and I are resisting a second criminal eviction (just 12 months after the theft of my home on 4th November, 2010) by Nottingham County Court bailiffs and the complicit Nottinghamshire Constabulary.
The warrant had, as a matter of fact, been settled by way of a cash payment, for which we had a signed receipt from the county court where the money was tendered. [see below]
The warrant upon which the queen’s men were reliant:
What the law states:
Under the County Court Act 1984 – Section 87 –
“Upon payment of the amount outstanding, the right to enforce a warrant of Possession is suspended.”
Note: whilst it has been correctly pointed out that there is a reference to an outstanding sum of £126,581.24, the intention was to nullify the warrant so that the eviction could not go ahead. Therefore, at least as far as the warrant was concerned, it was a valid attempt to void it, albeit an unsuccessful one.
The copper did not challenge it at the time. Looking back, we were under considerable pressure as we were facing a second unlawful eviction in 12 months and we reasoned it was worth a try, if only to expose the BS operation of the warrant, which, by law, should have been signed by a judge and clearly was not.
In a similar case that eventually ended up in the Crown Court, the judge there ordered that the valid warrant be produced, containing the judge’s signature. The County Court refused to provide it, which speaks volumes about the fraudulent nature of any and all possession warrants. So, at least as far as the warrant was concerned, the receipt did prove it was satisfied:
This crucial evidence was criminally ignored by those acting as constables each and every time it was presented to them. At a certain point in the ensuing action (which lasted for 6 hours or so on that cold day of 07 November, 2011), Remi, seeing the vultures beginning to gather, strides down the street, holding aloft his copy of the bible. Full of righteous indignation he declares,
“These people are criminals: they are breaking the law. See this here, the Queen swore an oath on this thing here, ok? This is the law.”
He is expressing the truth. It is a striking moment.
Part 3: The Broken Promises of the UK’s Judges and Constables
Firstly, the scene above graphically illustrates the extreme lengths to which the Crown’s agents (in the forms of the Court, the judge, Richard Inglis, its Bailiffs and Nottinghamshire police) will go in the violent enforcement of a satisfied, albeit void, warrant of possession.
Secondly, it demonstrates the individual and collective breaches of the oaths sworn by the judge and the attendant constables and, hence, the fraudulent actions of those acting in those roles.
In my own case against the Bradford and Bingley, Richard Inglis, the then ‘senior judge’ or, more accurately, overlord of Nottingham County Court, repeatedly failed to apply the statutory law of mortgages, in clear breach of his oath of office which states:
“I, _________ , do swear by Almighty God that I will well and truly serve
our Sovereign Lady Queen Elizabeth the Second in the office of ________ ,
and I will do right to all manner of people after the laws and usages of
this realm, without fear or favour, affection or ill will. “
For the court to ignore the facts of the matter, as reasonably presented to the judge and then conspire with the bank, the bailiffs, locksmiths and police to steal the house, without any evidence of a lawful contract or consideration, is as clear a breach of this oath as can be imagined.
To throw people out on to the street, essentially over a fake debt, with no regard whatsoever for the evictees’ well-being is, self-evidently, a psychopathic action that stands in breach of natural law. To reiterate: any action that causes harm to others is satanic.
It is a top-down system of psychopathic tyranny that infects every level of public life and it flows directly from the cruel deception that is the monarchy. The police are one cog in this tyranny and they have been played.
Each constable swears an oath of allegiance to the queen, in which he promises to serve and protect the people, without fear or favour. Yet, as was the case here, by taking the side of the Court and its officers, and ignoring the first-hand evidence of the receipt for the settlement of the warrant, the constables of Nottinghamshire, jointly and severally, were demonstrably in breach of their oath of office:
“I do solemnly and sincerely declare and affirm that I will well and
truly serve the Queen in the office of constable, with fairness,
integrity, diligence and impartiality, upholding fundamental human
rights and according equal respect to all people; and that I will, to
the best of my power, cause the peace to be kept and preserved and
prevent all offences against people and property; and that while I
continue to hold the said office I will to the best of my skill and
knowledge discharge all the duties thereof faithfully according to
law.”
A constable from Nottinghamshire Police Force in breach of his oath:
MOD: “You may well fold your arms and stare into empty space because that’s the chasm you’re looking at. The sooner you guys wake up to what’s going on, the better. I’m asking you for some help here, man. I’m scared. Excuse me, I’m scared [taps PC on shoulder]. Can’t you help me?” PC: “We’re here to protect.. “ MOD: “Right, well, they’re knocking my front door down, how’s that not a breach of the peace?”
Conclusion: “Kingly power is neither free nor unlimited.”
Swearing allegiance to a monarch who has, in turn, promised to uphold God’s law, necessarily means that the police too are beholden to natural law. This second eviction scene illustrates how the woman acting as ‘her majesty’ and the officers of ‘her Majesty’s Courts’ completely fail in their obligation to uphold natural law and the ancient laws of these lands (the common law). For Elizabeth, the woman, this breach is a direct inversion of her coronation oath, which included her promise, as nominal defender of the faith, to protect the God-given rights of the people:
“But, to obviate all doubts and difficulties concerning this matter, it is expressly declared by statute 12 & 13 W. III. c. 2. that
“the laws of England are the birthright of the people thereof; and all the kings and queens who shall ascend the throne of this realm ought to administer the government of the same according to the said laws; and all their officers and ministers ought to serve them respectively according to the same: and therefore all the laws and statutes of this realm, for securing the established religion, and the rights and liberties of the people thereof, and all other laws and statutes of the same now in force, are by his majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the lords spiritual and temporal and commons, and by authority of the same, ratified and confirmed accordingly.”
Source: Commentaries on the Laws of England (1765-1769) SIR WILLIAM BLACKSTONE BOOK 1, CHAPTER 6 ‘Of the King’s Duties’
Given the queen’s oath is sworn on the bible, which necessarily means the monarchy is contractually obliged to uphold the law of god, then what about the law on usury?
Ancient customs/law banned usury. As does the bible. Further, what of the double fraud that take place in The Great British Mortgage Swindle – the charging of compound interest on credit/money that was created out of thin air?
The bible is perfectly clear on this issue
Let us not forget that each and every so-called bank is a Rothschild-licenced money-changer (or conjuror) which operates under the fraudulent aegis of the ‘Crown’. The bank deceptively claims that one is a borrower and then adds compound interest on top of the fake loan, which necessitates. and this is a major plank in the perpetuation of TGBMS, that a mortgagor not only has to pay off the original principal (the value of the fictitious ‘loan’) but also the unlawful interest on top of that which usually results in him paying around three times the amount of the false debt.
That is why it is a monstrous swindle whose enforcement amounts to nothing less than tyranny.
The antidote to Kabbalistic Inversion: Tell the Truth & Shame the Devil.
It is often said that the devil is in the detail. Therefore, given the monarch’s self-evident breach of contract, the inversion of all pubic oaths taken by officers of the courts and the police and the nature of The Great British Mortgage Swindle, it is reasonable to state that we are living under the yoke of tyranny.
This tyranny operates from the ‘top’ down and, to any one with the requisite levels of critical thinking, it amounts to nothing less than a breach of natural law. One may term it god’s law or one may term it the common law but, whichever phrase one chooses, it is clear we are being subjected to a system of control that is an inversion of the truth. This inversion is abhorrent to anyone who knows what is right, what is just and what the truth is.
In this sense, the monarchy and its minions represent the anti-christ, from which one may extrapolate that it is satanic.
The antidote is to reveal its nefarious workings and call it what it is.
The antidote is to stop complying with it.
The antidote lies within each and every one of us who, by way of our god-given intelligence, to stand in the truth and take natural law as the only law we need follow.
Therefore, although my boyhood oath of allegiance to the queen was rightly rescinded on account of her abject failure to uphold her Royal compact with the people, that which I swore to god and natural law stands as good.
Thus, God is my right: Dieu et mon droit
The individuals who continue to uphold the tyranny and the accompanying falsehoods that operate to the detriment of the people have, by way of their actions, chosen to follow the path of the anti-christ. Elizabeth ‘Windsor’ can no longer claim that motto as evidence of her divine right to reign.
May god help her and all those who act under her name.
♥——————————–º———————————♥
Thank you for your attention. I am still without a UK bank account and I am currently homeless, which means any and all donations are most helpful and truly appreciated at this time, so please feel free to chuck a few quid into the RogueMale coffers.
Therefore, if you’re able, please consider taking out a paid subscription on Substack or donate via the Rogue Male Coffee Pot.
Until the next time, all the very best to you and yours and, remember, Fortune truly Favours the Brave.
Have I been debanked over my eccentric views on life? For being a philosopher? (A Lover of Wisdom?)
Doubtful whether it could be my political views as I consider all politicians to be puppets in a uni-party fake democracy. Two cheeks of the same arse, in other words.
Keir Stalin meets the Don in the White House and his effete body language, as he sits cross-legged like a girl.
JD Vance makes point about the tyrannical treatment and abuse of UK people who are deemed to have written hurtful social media posts which may upset certain protected peoples currently residing like cuckoos in thousands of nests across the lands of Britain.
In reply, Starmer lied by saying freedom of speech is and has always been valued in the UK. A dishonourable untruth.
The ridiculous On line Harms Act and associated Warrant Officers [PIC]
Dave’s mortgage case – Mr Laville and the forged affidavit. [PICS]. How forgery is a criminal act at Common Law.
The world is a magical fiction – ‘time’ is not linear
Good art will express eternal truths through its fictions
My debanking experience – my sincere appreciate for all the donations and the insightful comments.
The Truth of Good Art –
The Truth is Beauty, Beauty is Truth
Thank you for listening.
Should you be able to support me during this time of my debanking, please consider chucking a few quid into the pot via the BuyMeACoffee button and/or taking out a paid subscription at my Substack page.
HOW & WHY MAGNA CARTA WAS FOUNDED ON ANCIENT BRITISH HISTORY & LAW.
It is reasonable to state that the Peoples of these islands [commonly known as the ‘British Isles, including Ireland’] have a long and noble history of common law.
Natural law may be seen as the innate understanding of what is fair or right (correct). The common law rises from it. Natural law, being of the creator/nature/god, is superior to any man-made law (positive law) which may be used to place a state, corporation or any individual between a Man and his maker.
From the common law, there arises knowledge of certain key principles like the right to a fair hearing, freedom of expression, due process of the law and the power of a jury to nullify an unjust law or exonerate an individual who has been wrongfully accused. It includes the reasonable principle that a crime cannot have been committed without there being a victim, or injured party.
“Blind unquestioning obedience is the law of tyrants and of slaves: it does not yet flourish on English soil… Arrested with or without a warrant, the subject is entitled to know why he is deprived of his freedom, if only in order that he may, without a moment’s delay, take such steps as will enable him to regain it.” Christie v. Leachinsky [1947] A.C 573.
From: “Freedom under the Law” by Sir Alfred Denning, One of the Lords Justices of his Majesty’s Court of Appeal in England’ 1949 (Thirteenth Impression, 1986)
Common sense is the innate understanding that rises in a man when he is faced with an issue or situation that and it is founded in intuitive reason. Common law, in so far as it depends on the ability to reason, is common sense.
For an overview of the distinctions between natural and common law, here is an interesting read:
In Western culture, the philosophical conception of natural law first appears among ancient Greek thinkers. Although natural law is often conflated with common law, the two are distinct.
Common law is not based on inherent rights, but is the legal tradition whereby certain rights or values are legally recognized by virtue of already having judicial recognition or articulation.
Natural law is often contrasted with the human-made laws (positive law) of a given political community, society, or state.
In legal theory, the interpretation of a human-made law requires some reference to natural law. On this understanding of natural law, natural law can be invoked to criticize judicial decisions about what the law says, but not to criticize the best interpretation of the law itself.
Some jurists and scholars use natural law synonymously with natural justice or natural right (Latin ius naturale), while others distinguish between natural law and natural right.”
“Cicero wrote in his De Legibus that both justice and law derive their origin from what nature has given to man, from what the human mind embraces, from the function of man, and from what serves to unite humanity.
For Cicero, natural law obliges us to contribute to the general good of the larger society.
The purpose of positive laws is to provide for “the safety of citizens, the preservation of states, and the tranquility and happiness of human life.”
In this view, “wicked and unjust statutes” are “anything but ‘laws,'” because “in the very definition of the term ‘law’ there inheres the idea and principle of choosing what is just and true.”
Law, for Cicero, “ought to be a reformer of vice and an incentive to virtue.” Cicero expressed the view that “the virtues which we ought to cultivate, always tend to our own happiness, and that the best means of promoting them consists in living with men in that perfect union and charity which are cemented by mutual benefits.”
SOURCE
The Isles of Britain: Ourstory
Our ancestral story goes back further than we have been led to believe – way past the principles of law as enshrined in the Great Charter, the Magna Carta of 1215 and to a time predating the arrival of the armies of Rome. For an eloquently straightforward overview of the evidence of the geometrical, architectural and cultural sophistication of our ancestors, the reader is invited to watch the following film by Tom Brooks:
To return to 1215, the most often-referenced parts of the Great Charter are,
+ (39) No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgment of his equals or by the law of the land.
(40) To no one will we sell, to no one deny or delay right or justice.”
A free man is simply one who is not a slave. In other words, he is a man who is not a citizen; one who has revoked his consent to be governed by authorities which common sense shows him to be tyrannical and oppressive.
We live in times of great deception, where pollutants bombard our earth and our biology from every source (land, sea, air, water and sky/ether); a world in which fake religions like that of Money/Banking, the State-corporate and organisations such as Judaism, Catholicism, Christianity, Islam et al seek to control our minds and hearts. Whether by ill-intended design or not, the effects are the same.
It logically follows that those who have no knowledge of these matters are those most vulnerable to the sophistry of those who prey on them by way of deception. For instance, until one knows how little power a bailiff has, then one will be thrown into a state of emotional imbalance (fear) which makes one easy to manipulate and vulnerable to attack from those who seek to psychologically, financially or spiritually dominate one.
This, of course, is what lies behind the fake paperwork and oppressive conduct of those who act as ‘debt collectors’. An individual will be similarly fraught with anxiety if he knows not how MON-EY is created. In the sense that huge swathes of people have no idea whence it comes from, what it means and hold the view that it is all-powerful, then they have fallen for a religion for they place blind faith in its ‘magical’ powers. To understand how it is created and controlled to the advantage of an elite is to break its hold over the psyche.
Quite how and why certain individuals and state-corporations seek to achieve such control is for the individual to investigate – the information is out there and people may choose to not use their common sense. They can live in willful ignorance or not.
What is the truth?
The truth is that which can be evidenced. It does not rely on emotion. The enemies of truth – and there are many – seek to dominate our emotions in order to make feelings reason subordinate to emotion, the result of which is a populace that is easier to control.
Should one doubt that, then ask the question,
Why would a creator give us the ability to reason, if he wanted us to have a blind unquestioning faith in what we’re told, without ever thinking for ourselves based on scientific proof ?”
Who benefits from nihilism?
nihilism |ˈnīəˌlizəmˈnēəˌlizəm| noun the rejection of all religious and moral principles, often in the belief that life is meaningless. • Philosophy extreme skepticism maintaining that nothing in the world has a real existence. historical the doctrine of an extreme Russian revolutionary party c.1900, which found nothing to approve of in the established social order.
ORIGIN early 19th cent.: from Latin nihil ‘nothing’ + -ism.
Modern nihilism, whereby the origins of life and life itself are taken to be meaningless and without reason, having begun by way of some mythical ‘big bang’ only leaves us swimming and drowning in a sea of lies. One would do well to ask cui bono (‘who benefits’?) from this state of affairs when millions of people believe that life is meaningless?
To reiterate: historical truth goes by evidence not emotion. Some may say that Magna Carta was based on those principles of law as established by the English king known as Alfred (the Great). Yet what of the more ancients kings of these lands, the ones who were here long before the Saxons and others who invaded these shores? What of those indigenous Britons whose ancestral lineage extends back over 4,000 years into antiquity?
The lies of history have sought to bury that knowledge in favour of those who have usurped these lands for their own material benefit, of which William the Bastard, who invaded in 1066, is a prime example.
Freedom from tyranny
And yet that which is true cannot be buried – or at least not indefinitely. Which is why it is crucial to uncover the hidden history of the indigenous people’s of these islands known as Great Britain.
“tyranny |ˈtirənē| noun (pl. tyrannies) cruel and oppressive government or rule: people who survive war and escape tyranny | the removal of the regime may be the end of a tyranny. • a nation under cruel and oppressive government. • cruel, unreasonable, or arbitrary use of power or control: she resented his rages and his tyranny | figurative : the tyranny of the nine-to-five day | his father’s tyrannies. • (especially in ancient Greece) rule by one who has absolute power without legal right.”
When a man finds himself subject to tyranny, it is by way of his common sense and the process of natural law that bring him to rebel and to stand his ground on that which he knows to be true. The tyranny is too much for him to tolerate – he knows it is better to die on one’s feet than on one’s knees.
Such was the state of affairs that led to the sealing of the Magna Carta by the despotic King John at Runnymede in 1215.
A man is a divine body of spirit and matter, as rooted to the earth as he is connected to the heavens in the firmament above, his potential is only limited by his imagination and his connectedness to the great soul from whence he came.
The unearthing of the truth by way of his common sense can effect his escape from the tyranny he perceives. By releasing the mental shackles, he steps into the power of his divinity.
The world of MATTER is inseparable from that of the spirit. Born of mater (mother), one has materialised on these lands in order to play an active role in the world and if tyranny stands in one’s way, then so be it: it must and will be vanquished.
The ancient laws of Britain were laid down by Dyfnal Moel Myd (Dyvnwal Moelmud) and they arise from Natural Law. It is self-evident that they pre-date any of the masses of fake statutory/legal systems of control as traitorously put in place by the psychotic controllers.
The law and society as they stood in ancient Britain during the centuries preceding the Roman invasion of 55 BC. It is based upon the surviving laws of king Dyfnal Moel Myd (Dunvallo Molmutius), who reigned in the 5th-4th centuries BC. The account, from pp. 20-24 of Flinders Petrie’s paper, bears repeated reading, for it reveals a level of culture and literacy amongst the early Britons that is quite unlike the popular image that has been cultivated in recent years by the modernist treatment of British history. It also speaks volumes for the existence of a king whom modernists have always said was a mythical figure, and it reveals our ancestors to have been a highly cultivated and civilised people, and not the illiterate painted savages of popular fame.”
“The condition of pagan Britain is remarkably preserved in the laws of Dyvnal Moelmud. That these laws are certainly long before the tenth century is proved by the gulf that exists between the state of society shown by them and that of the laws of Howel fixed to AD 914.
The laws of Howel show a highly complex and detailed condition of law, and an elaborate royal court, with the rights of officials minutely fixed. In the laws of Moelmud there is very simple law, always subject to proved custom and to adaptation to circumstance; there is no royal court, and very few officials, with no defined claims.
Moreover, the laws of Howel refer back to Moelmud. What takes the laws of Moelmud at least to Roman times is that they are purely Pagan, and the only Christian allusion is an addition to the forms of legal oath, saying that ‘In subsequent times the form of oath was given by the Ten Commandments, the Gospel of St. John, and the blessed Cross’ (no. 219). T
his stamps the previous oaths and the rest of the laws as of the pagan period, and therefore at least of the third century, as British bishops attended the Council of Aries in AD 314. How much farther back these laws may date, towards the traditional time of Moelmud, the fourth or seventh century BC, we cannot now enquire.” SOURCE
The laws as codified by Moelmud were based on the ancient rights, usages and customs of the people.
Those principles exemplified in Magna Carta were therefore inspired by and founded in more ancient traditions.
These central tenets of law therefore go back thousands of years.
These laws give a remarkable view of a community with the greatest respect for weakness and misfortune, high rights for women, full consideration for foreigners, and great privilege for learning, for the arts, and the crafts. Social duty was strongly held, and the full power rested on the vote of every free man and woman, even to deposing the king. Arms were prohibited civil assembly, and the harp was as necessary to a free man his coat and his cooking-pot. The whole air is that of simple conditions and a free life, with much personal cultivation and sympathy in general conduct. It would be impossible to produce such a code from a savage or violent people, and this intimate view of their life is the best ground for judging of their qualities. That there was generally a well-organized peace kept in the country is shown by Caesar’s statement that ‘the number of the people is countless, and their buildings exceedingly numerous.”
The Molmutine Laws are given in the form of triads – a poetic form which comes in ‘threes’, an aspect of oral bardic tradition whereby information was more easily memorised:
1. There are three tests of civil liberty: equality of rights, equality of taxation, freedom to come and go.
2. Three things are indispensable to a true union of nations: sameness of laws, rights, and language.
3. There are three things free to all Britons: the forest, the unworked mine, the right of hunting.
4. There are three property birthrights of every Briton: five British acres of land for a home, the right of suffrage in the enacting of the laws, the male at twenty-one, the female on her marriage.
5. There are three things which every Briton may legally be compelled to attend: the worship of God, military service, the courts of law.
6. There are three things free to every man, Briton or foreigner, the refusal of which no law will justify: water from spring, river, or well; firing from a decayed tree; a block of stone not in use.
7. There are three classes which are exempt from bearing arms: bards, judges, graduates in law or religion. These represent God and His peace, and no weapon must ever be found in their hands.
8. There are three persons who have a right of public maintenance: the old, the babe, the foreigner who can not speak the British tongue.
9. There are three things free to a country and its borders: the roads, the rivers, and the places of worship. These are under the protection of God and His peace.”
It is those long-established principles which formed the bedrock of the demands made by the Barons to King John in 1215 and which were subsequently used to form the constitution of the United States:
For more than six hundred years– that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215–there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or resisting the execution of, such law.”
–Lysander Spooner, The Right of Juries
They will never be lost as they exist as imprints within the very dna of all free-thinking and righteous peoples across the planet.
Contrary to the deceptions at the heart of nihilism, we are each born free and exist under God only. No man, potentate or de facto agency of the state-corporate can come between the man who knows who he truly is and acknowledges the Golden Rule:
Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.”
That is the legacy of Dyfnal Moel Myd (Dunvallo Molmutius) and the ancient ancestors of the peoples of Britain and that is why a system of control that seeks to bury the principles of justice and divinity by way of ‘Civil Law’ and nihilism is doomed to failure.
Tyranny will fail as it is a closed system that none will thrive under. Freedom will always reign supreme and it is gaining in popular awareness. It is there to be claimed and exemplified by the independent man, not granted by pope, prelate or fake potentate.
Was man created to live in a closed system?
It is a given that freedom is an idea and a natural way of being that can never be vanquished. It is for this reason that the laws of ancient times, the Magna Carta, the common law, the constitution of the united states and all systems of justice that are predicated on them and common sense are as valid now as they have ever been. Their validity is based on them existing as eternal truth and not simply upon some dusty document that the people were not party to.
It may be stated that they are of incalculable value in these times given the demonstrable tyranny of the state-corporate whose modus operandi is more control and less freedom.
All men thrive in an open system of mutually respected freedom – one is free to do as one chooses, providing no harm is caused to his fellow beings.
The Great Charter of 1215 embodied the spirit of that time and it also carried within it the principles behind the more ancient laws of these lands. Those principles hold good today as they are founded in the truth.
RM posits that a Great Charter for the present (2016) has already been created and exists as the treaty of Universal Community Trust, a voluntary association of self-governed individuals, forming anarcho-nations under natural law
Anyone to whom these words and principles resonate in their hearts and minds, is hereby invited to drop their citizenship and declare their individual sovereignty and, under voluntary association with like-minded souls, form his own anarcho-nation, wherever he so be, each living under natural law, in accord with the terms of the treaty. A pdf of such a declaration is attached below along with a Sovereign Declaration by which the individual may relinquish his citizenship.
As always, a huge thank you to all those readers and listeners who have shown their generous appreciation for my discourses and essays. Should you be able, please chuck a few quid in the pot via the Buy Me a Coffee button and/or take out a subscription to my Substack pages. if you like, you can also support me by taking out a paid subscription which will grant you ‘first dibs’ on my output.
All the very best, Michael.
A Maxim is an eternal truth. The above aphorism was originally expressed by our ancestors in the ancient Brythonic language,
‘Y Gwir Yn Erbyn Y Byd’
In this realm where the demiurge dominates the every thought and action of 99.999999% of the poulace, the ‘rogue’, the indvidual who goes his own way, the sojourner travelling through a perceived reality (mental construct) is an anomaly. He is not here to go along to get along but to forge his own way.
As the epoch slips into ever more craziness, in the demiurge’s vainglorious attempts to control all its fake narratives and multidunous deceptions, then he who stands by and under the truth is truly the hero of his own life. He is also a rebel for he will not accept lies as truths. This attitude brings about a bountiful state of fearlessness for the man who refuses to accept the shackles, shekels and sordid souvenirs that are offered to him in by the demiurge which operates through the ageis of the cryptocracey and its fraudulent systems of finance, law, religion, education, health and media.
He is a natural treasure, a blessed soul who glides onwards and upwards through the weirs, waterfalls and rock-pools of his journey.
Yet this zeitgeist is nothing new for his rebelliousness runs through his veins from an ancestral inheritance that goes back millennia. His adherence to the Truth is the anvil on which his immortal soul is beaten into shape, as the harsh lessons are learned and his obstacles overcome. He acknowledges his divine aspects and by comparison with the multitudinous populace, he challenges the official narratives by way of his reason and the gleanings he has unearthed on his lonely ways.
Once such bogus narrative is that of Divoc-91, the psy-op that was wheeled out in March, 2020. In November of that memorable year, I wrote the following essay – its relevance is as complete now as it was then.
When the truth is that Covid1984 is a fraud, on the simple basis that there is no evidence of its existence, and the criminal politicians and the complicit mainstream media deliberately omit the facts, it is clear that we are in the realm of nefarious mindgames; that all of the propaganda is psychological warfare, being waged on the world’s populations.
In the same way the banks create the illusion of money (credit created out of thin air), the WHO and World Economic Forum (WEF) have created an imaginary lurgy.
All is mind. The controllers know this and that is why they go to such extreme lengths to control and manipulate the individual’s consciousness. It’s a form of mass hypnosis and it is perpetrated by the controlled media, in all its forms.
Just as the narcissist gaslights his victim, with the intention of disorientating the target to the point where he begins to believe he is going mad, the lies of the UK ‘gov’ (and all others who are in line with the ‘great reset’) serve to undermine our sanity. The lies are palpable to anyone who is capable of critical thinking. As such, those with the capacity to think critically will have developed their own cognitive immunity to the psyop they are being subjected to. Here is a prime example of the kind of psychological warfare being waged on the people:
Just like the vast majority of the world’s governments, the UK ‘gov’ operates under the false notion that we, the people, are as thick as pigshit. As such, it takes the fallacious position that one size fits all – whether it be under the guise of law, health, finance, education, travel, or any kind of cognitive freedom. This is the fallacy behind the vaxtermination programme it claims it will impose upon us all. The mantra is familiar, and it is one used by all tyrants when they are attempting to take away the natural rights of the people,
“It’s for the greater good.”
Let’s briefly follow the money.
To coin a favourite phrase of the criminal poli-puppet, Boris Johnson, ‘gov’ has spaffed countless billions on this Covid1984 psy-op. Over £200 billion in fake loans, much of which has been dished out via gov contracts to croney associates of those MPs who have arranged supply contracts for members of their families and others. AKA conflicts of interest.
“The UK’s pandemic response relies too heavily on scientists and other government appointees with worrying competing interests, including shareholdings in companies that manufacture covid-19 diagnostic tests, treatments, and vaccines. Government appointees are able to ignore or cherry pick science—another form of misuse—and indulge in anti-competitive practices that favour their own products and those of friends and associates.” Source, British Medical Journal
Rishi Sunak, the man acting as Chancellor of the Exchequer is the one who has facilitated the fake loans, for and on behalf of his bankster controllers.
However, the truth is there is no debt. It is all imaginary. Created out of nothing.Whether it be to a government, a business or an individual, there is never a loan. The credit that is created is simply stolen by the bank and misrepresented as a loan. The omission of the facts of credit creation makes all purported bank loans fraudulent. Very few people seem to grasp this and even fewer people actually write about it.
Nevertheless, the truth is that all banks are in the business of issuing credit backed by valuable securities of all descriptions. A security is defined thus:
“ ‘ valuable security ‘ means any document creating, transferring, surrendering or releasing any right to, in or over property, or authorising the payment of money or delivery of any property, or evidencing the creation, transfer, surrender or release of any such right, or the payment of money or delivery of any property, or the satisfaction of any obligation.”
Were there a genuinely benevolent ‘gov’ that was truly serving the best interests of the people, it would immediately make moves to free the people of the imaginary debt burden by declaring the facts and conditionally accepting any and all alleged debts upon proof of claim that any moneys were factually loaned in the first instance, using a simple process that can be viewed here.
Essentially, the entire edifice of the state and the operations of its various agencies are built on fraud. Covid1984 is a classic example of fraud on the simple basis that there is no proof the virus exists and that people can catch infections from viruses.
Furthermore,
“No matter where you look in the supposed genome of SARS-CoV-2, there is nothing in the WHO’s test protocols that clearly identifies what it is. The whole genome could be false. The tests do not prove the existence of SARS-CoV-2. All they reveal is a soup of unspecified genetic material.
If so, as there are no isolates or purified samples of the virus, without a viable test, there is no evidence that SARS-CoV-2 exists. Therefore, nor is there any evidence that a disease called COVID 19 exists.
This infers that there is no scientific basis for any claims about COVID 19 case numbers, hospital admissions or mortality figures. All measures taken to combat this deadly virus are quite possibly founded upon nothing.” Source: Off-Guardian
Notwithstanding that fact, there is the issue of the tests themselves:
“The test cannot discriminate between the whole virus and viral fragments. Therefore, the test cannot be used as a diagnostic for intact (infectious) viruses, making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus”
The low quality of its public pronouncements, its advertising campaigns, the mealy-mouthed drivel that spews from the parliamentarians’ mouths and whatever guff they want us to believe is neatly summarised by this pathetic propaganda piece. Note its appeal to the child-like mind.
What the world’s governments are engaged in is Criminal Fraud. The maxim, ‘Fraud Vitiates All’ stands as the truth.
The question is will mankind stand true also or will it fall into the abyss? An abyss imagined by Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum – another actor playing out the role of the villain on the world stage, a villain who hitherto has been the stuff of sci-fi. Has this character been scripted? Undoutedly. Who are his masters? The Sabbatean Frankist money changers who go by the name of Rothschild. The predictive programming aspects of Dr Who make for interesting associations:
_______________________________________________
As ever, a huge thank you for the magnificent support of David R.
Should anyone wish to express his/her appreciation, then please use the Buy Me a Coffee button and leave me a comment – I will get back to you.
I can also be found on Substack, should you frequent that platform.
Some 200 feet below the Pumping Station at Papplewick, Nottinghamshire, there is a huge aquifer- an underground supply of water that never runs dry. This is Part 2 of my RogueCast on the pumping station.
Half a mile to the north of the pump house, there is a remarkable underground reservoir, which the official narrative would have us was built in a matter of months by a construction company from Wolverhampton.
This time, I shot some of the working machines and more footage of the two massive beam pumps – all of which constitutes a magnificent legacy from a time when our ancestors were evidently more skilled in architecture and engineering than we are today.
The underground reservoir is stunning in its crypt-like quality and it’s hard to believe that it has not been filled with water since 1920.
Many thanks to all the volunteers at the Pumping Station, without whom none of this wonderful history would have survived.
Viewers may be interested to note that the water quality of the aquifer is of a very pure standard, which may lead to the question as to how and why Severn Trent Water believe that chlorine and fluoride should be added to it.
I trust you enjoy it. Thank you for watching. Should you be feeling appreciative, then please tip me a few quid via the Buy Me a Coffee button and, remember too that I can also be read on Substack.
Each day, millions of gallons of water are pumped up at the Papplewick Pumping Station to be distributed to thousands of homes. Now pumped out with electric pumps, which replaced the still-functioning steam-powered ones, the station stands as a monument to the engineering and architectural abilities of our British ancestors. This is a special edition of the RogueCast, with Part 2 to follow this week.
A visit to the opening day celebrating 140 years of the Papplewick Pumping Station, 7 miles north of Nottingham had me pondering on a number of issues, particularly the codswallop of a 50 pence piece and some epic nonsense in the M&S gents’ urinals.
The fact is, and I did not know this until yesterday, that there is an aquifer in Papplewick that is some 200 feet below the surface which is constantly replenished, all of which makes a nonsense of any climate change assertion that water is somehow scarce, on the simple basis that these underground water sources are to found everywhere across the Isles of Britain.
Thank you, as always, for your support and should you be feeling appreciative, then please chuck a few quid in the pot via the Buy Me a Coffee button, leave a comment and I will get back to you.
Readers and viewers may support and follow my output on Substack, which, at least as far as I can tell, appears to be a home to free speech.
In the meantime, I continue to be pumped with a blessedness that I can only hint but which may be discerned via my essays and through my latest RogueCast
Logos is Reason, it is the logic of the Trivium and its meaning has been watered-down in the Bible by way of its mis-translation from the Greek to English.
Manners Maketh the Man was the theme of yesterday’s essay and this RogueCast is a further rumination on the subject, one in which I introduce the term Logos or Reason to the discourse.
In the Beginning was the Word and the Word was God
is the opening line of the Bible and it has a precision and boldness that resonates with the reader or listener. Regardless of the mis-translation, its direct clarity rings true, like a church bell peeling over town or country.
When the individual appreciates the Truth and only the Truth then he is at one with God – he is but a divine fragment, an insignificant aspect of his true creator, a blessed living soul, the sojourner who is passing through this realm and he knows who and what he is.
I emphasise the individual for what many seeem to instinctively know but forget is that the journey through life is highly-personalised and, ultimately, not that of a collective. Born alone, we meet fellow souls on the way and then we pass out again, alone. Alone but not lonely.
To return to the stark clarity of that opening line of the Bible, a book which, for what it’s worth, I regard in the main, as a work of fiction:
The greatest truths are contained in art and if the world is a fiction, then it should not surprise us to read that line as a paradox because that is the essential quality of this world. God, ultimately, is ineffable, beyond our powers of description, beyond the art and beyond explanation and yet…
As I ramble through the woods, I make the point that the original Greek version from which the English Bible was translated uses the word logos and how the knowledge of that underplaying caused by the mistranslation serves to deepen its meaning as it takes the indvidual further into the true import of the line.
When we reconsider the line, with logos – meaning reason or logic – then it becomes even more precise,
In the Beginning was the Logos and the Logos was God
and it means that God is Logic, that God is reason.
The extrapolation of which is that each and every one of us has been created by way of reason. We know that there is purpose to our lives, that we are not fragments of ‘evolutionary’ star dust travelling through a nihilistic world. Rather, we are divine fragments of the one true God, a God who is the Logos.
To me, at least, it can mean nothing less than that. It is both uplifting and humbling and it draws me, inevitably, into a deeper state of wonderment and love.
I posit that the real holy trinity is the Trivium – the ages-old basis for our discernment of the truth, the truth of any subject. We are in a perceived reality – all is mind – and it follows from that our ability to reason is, simply put, divine. Little reason, therefore, that the demiurge, the false god of this mental construct goes to such lengths to cut the individual off from his divine ability to be as reasonable as his maker, for he is a blessed living fragment of that very reason behind his creation, and that is a threat to the forces of darkness that invert the world to such ridiculous extremes.
In the final analysis, it is way beyond my powers of expression to articulate it but I trust the RogueCast goes some way to hinting at it and, how it is a most indvidual realisation of my own logos. The most accurate depiction of this realisation comes to directly from the poetry of Alexander Pope, which rings through my being with all the resonance of those church bells referenced earlier,
“The Truth is Beauty; Beauty is Truth
That is All on Earth Ye need to Know.”
Thank you, as always, for your support and especially to Lizzie for her generosity which she expressed via the Buy Me a Coffee button . If you’re feeling equally appreciative, then please chuck a few quid in the pot, leave a comment and I will get back to you.
My work can also be read on Substack, which, at least as far as I can tell, appears to be a home to free speech.
Good manners appear to be in short supply right now.
It seems appropriate that after the recent passing of my 86 year old mother that I once again revisit another adage which she oft repeated to me at an earlier age,
Manners maketh the Man
Sometimes she would adopt it to, “It costs nothing to be polite, Michael.”
It is fair to state that Truth is the highest beauty and without it a man will fall into a pit of his own creation, one in which he is ever mindful of the pendulum that swings over him as he languishes in a confusion of lies.
Languishing in his pit of lies, the deceiver perishes
It is easier to be truthful than to be a liar for the latter had better possess a good memory on the simple basis that one lie leads to another, and then more and more are required in a vain attempt to prop up the original lie.
A man who possesses good manners is, by definition, one who is reasonable. After all, he cannot be polite when consumed by some fiery anger, for in such moments, he has, quite literally, lost his a ability to reason.
Reasoning will wither on the vine when passion is present.
Good manners or politeness are based on reason. If a man is to be a man, then he has to be able to reason. Maybe the phenomenon of transvestism and all the rest of the ‘trans-rights’ brigade of blokes who flounce about pretending to be women is best explained by stating that such men have lost their ability to reason: that they are being unreasonable.
Unreasonableness may afflict anyone but it mostly to be found in women for they are, in essence, emotional beings and when one is emotional, then one is simply succumbing to a feminity which has no place in a man.
A man’s ability to reason is Divine – God-given, after all is Man not created in the image of God? Are we not blessed essences of his being, who, as such, are truly loved, regardless of the codswallop that may come our way from women and those men who cannot control and direct their emotions?
Do we not betray that love when we veer from the Truth and allow empty rhetoric to hold sway?
Maxims are Truths and that is why they resonate so beautifully with us – when expressed, a truth resonates with the reader or listener to the very pit of his stomach: it is to be felt and known in an instant.
As previously stated, I have no time for those who shoot off their mouths without the data or reason to support their emotional outpourings.
In this epoch, in these times and in this realm, there are many in the shape of men but few real men but so it is and, for all those readers who instantly know the tenure of these words to be true, I salute you.
As I have written and spoken on many times, the construct of this realm has been inverted by those who are liars and perverts and, it is to be noted, it may well have always been thus, by which I mean there never was a paradise or a golden age. Edmund Spenser wrote this some 500 years ago and it is as pertinent now as it was then,
“For that which all men then did virtue call, Is now called vice; and that which vice was hight, Is now hight virtue, and so used of all: Right now is wrong, and wrong that was is right.”
To conclude: politeness in the face of rudeness and irritability is divine because it is always reasonable. It is the constant application of reason in a world of unreason and empty rhetoric that will inevitably triumph. Bluntly put, without his innate common sense – the Trivium – a man is not a man.
This essay is dedicated to my brother from another mother, Michael of Bernicia, a man whose nobility, love of the Truth and honour remain intact in the face of all attacks on his good name.
Thank you as always for your support and especially to Lizzie for her generosity which she expressed via the Buy Me a Coffee button. If you’re feeling equally appreciative, then please chuck a few quid in the pot, leave a comment and I will get back to you.
My work can also be read on Substack, which, at least as far as I can tell, appears to be a home to free speech.
A Maxim is an eternal truth. The above aphorism was originally expressed by our ancestors in the ancient Brythonic language,
‘Y Gwir Yn Erbyn Y Byd’
When the truth is that Covid1984 is a fraud, on the simple basis that there is no evidence of its existence, and the criminal politicians and the complicit mainstream media deliberately omit the facts, it is clear that we are in the realm of nefarious mindgames; that all of the propaganda is psychological warfare, being waged on the world’s populations.
In the same way the banks create the illusion of money (credit created out of thin air), the WHO and World Economic Forum (WEF) have created an imaginary lurgy.
All is mind. The controllers know this and that is why they go to such extreme lengths to control and manipulate the individual’s consciousness. It’s a form of mass hypnosis and it is perpetrated by the controlled media, in all its forms.
Just as the narcissist gaslights his victim, with the intention of disorientating the target to the point where he begins to believe he is going mad, the lies of the UK ‘gov’ (and all others who are in line with the ‘great reset’) serve to undermine our sanity. The lies are palpable to anyone who is capable of critical thinking. As such, those with the capacity to think critically will have developed their own cognitive immunity to the psyop they are being subjected to. Here is a prime example of the kind of psychological warfare being waged on the people:
Just like the vast majority of the world’s governments, the UK ‘gov’ operates under the false notion that we, the people, are as thick as pigshit. As such, it takes the fallacious position that one size fits all – whether it be under the guise of law, health, finance, education, travel, or any kind of cognitive freedom. This is the fallacy behind the vaxtermination programme it claims it will impose upon us all. The mantra is familiar, and it is one used by all tyrants when they are attempting to take away the natural rights of the people,
“It’s for the greater good.”
Let’s briefly follow the money.
To coin a favourite phrase of the criminal poli-puppet, Boris Johnson, ‘gov’ has spaffed countless billions on this Covid1984 psy-op. Over £200 billion in fake loans, much of which has been dished out via gov contracts to croney associates of those MPs who have arranged supply contracts for members of their families and others. AKA conflicts of interest.
“The UK’s pandemic response relies too heavily on scientists and other government appointees with worrying competing interests, including shareholdings in companies that manufacture covid-19 diagnostic tests, treatments, and vaccines. Government appointees are able to ignore or cherry pick science—another form of misuse—and indulge in anti-competitive practices that favour their own products and those of friends and associates.” Source, British Medical Journal
Rishi Sunak, the man acting as Chancellor of the Exchequer is the one who has facilitated the fake loans, for and on behalf of his bankster controllers.
However, the truth is there is no debt. It is all imaginary. Created out of nothing.Whether it be to a government, a business or an individual, there is never a loan. The credit that is created is simply stolen by the bank and misrepresented as a loan. The omission of the facts of credit creation makes all purported bank loans fraudulent. Very few people seem to grasp this and even fewer people actually write about it.
Nevertheless, the truth is that all banks are in the business of issuing credit backed by valuable securities of all descriptions. A security is defined thus:
“ ‘ valuable security ‘ means any document creating, transferring, surrendering or releasing any right to, in or over property, or authorising the payment of money or delivery of any property, or evidencing the creation, transfer, surrender or release of any such right, or the payment of money or delivery of any property, or the satisfaction of any obligation.”
Were there a genuinely benevolent ‘gov’ that was truly serving the best interests of the people, it would immediately make moves to free the people of the imaginary debt burden by declaring the facts and conditionally accepting any and all alleged debts upon proof of claim that any moneys were factually loaned in the first instance, using a simple process that can be viewed here.
Essentially, the entire edifice of the state and the operations of its various agencies are built on fraud. Covid1984 is a classic example of fraud on the simple basis that there is no proof the virus exists and that people can catch infections from viruses. For more essential information on the truth of the matter, readers are encouraged to listen to this:
“No matter where you look in the supposed genome of SARS-CoV-2, there is nothing in the WHO’s test protocols that clearly identifies what it is. The whole genome could be false. The tests do not prove the existence of SARS-CoV-2. All they reveal is a soup of unspecified genetic material.
If so, as there are no isolates or purified samples of the virus, without a viable test, there is no evidence that SARS-CoV-2 exists. Therefore, nor is there any evidence that a disease called COVID 19 exists.
This infers that there is no scientific basis for any claims about COVID 19 case numbers, hospital admissions or mortality figures. All measures taken to combat this deadly virus are quite possibly founded upon nothing.” Source: Off-Guardian
Notwithstanding that fact, there is the issue of the tests themselves:
“The test cannot discriminate between the whole virus and viral fragments. Therefore, the test cannot be used as a diagnostic for intact (infectious) viruses, making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus”
The low quality of its public pronouncements, its advertising campaigns, the mealy mouthed drivel that spews from the parliamentarians’ mouths and whatever guff they want us to believe is neatly summarised by this pathetic propaganda piece. Note its appeal to the child-like mind.
What the world’s governments are engaged in is Criminal Fraud. The maxim, ‘Fraud Vitiates All’ stands as the truth.
The question is will mankind stand true also or will it fall into the abyss? An abyss imagined by Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum – another actor playing out the role of the villain on the world stage, a villain who hitherto has been the stuff of sci-fi. Has this character been scripted? Undoutedly. Who are his masters? The Sabbatean Frankist money changers who go by the name of Rothschild. The predictive programming aspects of Dr Who make for interesting associations:
_______________________________________________
As ever, a huge thank you for the magnificent support of David R.
Should anyone kindly wish to leave a donation, then please use the paypal link.
Alternatively, you may choose to tip me some Bitcoin at this address: 1HqUX2C66HbvJddoAwUVdz8yqucWEpJN3L
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
