3 Stripes and You’re Out

A Discourse On the Stripes That Mark Out the Criminals at Play On the World’s Geopolitical Chessboard, Including an Inappropriate Pair of Trainers, a Railway ‘Line’, a Strange Striped Badge from 13th Century England and a Frantic Judicial Attempt to Cover Up A Mortgage Forgery.

Notes:

Keir Starmer’s vacuity, his Adidas Trainers, the Cocaine Train scandal, his cover ups for the elites.
His Treason as evidenced by his WEF role, his governmental plundering and funnelling of moneys to foreign interests and to the detriment of the peoples of the Isles of Britain.
How Starmer may well be up to his balls in a clandestine relationship and his conflicts of interest.
He is also fond of ‘hanging out’ with the notorious cokeheads, Macron and Zelensky.
Cocaine as a prop for the vacuous and those of feminised personalities
Effete men like Starmer and his two mates may well enjoy its effects.
The origins of the expression 4X2 as rhyming slang for ‘Jew’.
Where is the MSM coverage of the coke train scandal? Silence. A far cry from the halcyon days of tabloid outrage when a story of this magnitude broke.
More censorship from X
Starmer as a Tragic Anti-Hero – up to his neck in covering up the crimes of his elite handlers, a man who fell in love with the gross materiality of the world.
The empty shallowness of cocaine and how it amplifies individual vacuity, fuelling delusions of adequacy and grandeur.
Dave’s matter with the Nationwide BS who have made a fraudulent claim for possession of his home.
The barrister, Mr Laville (above), rather than explaining how the document came to be forged, turned up to the hearing but offered nothing, relying instead on repeating the mantra that Dave’s application was an ‘abuse of process’ when that is exactly what he is engaging in – a conclusion that is reached on the basis that he chose to remain silent about his reliance upon it in order to make material gain for his masters and his client, the Nationwide BS.
How Judge Pickering fallaciously dismissed Dave’s application on the false ground that he could only inspect and consider evidence in the court file, even when Dave has demonstrated in his Affidavit and in court to the judge himself that it contains a forgery.
The liars, perverts and subverters of the Truth and accuse others of that which they are engaging in themselves.
How to account for the conduct of Judge Pickering.
How, in matters such as this, Dave is the only one in the court who is standing under the facts of the matter in the unlawful possession claim against his home.

_____________________________________

As ever, thank you for your attention. If you are feeling appreciative, please chuck a few quid into the pot via the BuyMeACoffee button and/or take out a paid subscription at my Substack page.

May 16, 2025 2

Episode 65: A Perverted Pantomime

As Dame issues a perverted court order and falls into Void in Richard D. Hall Case.

The perversion of justice in the fake courts of the UK Plc is a subject I have been writing on for some 11 years now. Last week provided two stark examples of the continuance of the inversion of Natural Law by individuals with dubious biases and divided loyalties.

Perverted judgements and orders are anathema to a Lawful system of justice for they are founded on a fundamental lie. As such they are incurably void at Law.

It is important, as always, that we have a clear grasp of exactly what the terms actually mean.

Firstly, let’s take a look at the meaning and etymology of pervert and perverted:

Pervert verb | pərˈvərt | [with object]

alter (something) from its original course, meaning, or state to a distortion or corruption of what was first intended: he was charged with conspiring to pervert the course of justice.

lead (someone) away from what is considered right, natural, or acceptable: Hector is a man who is simply perverted by his time.

ORIGIN

late Middle English (as a verb): from Old French pervertir, from Latin pervertere, from per- ‘thoroughly, to ill effect’ + vertere ‘to turn’.

Thus, it follows that in Richard’s case, the judge has wilfully turned away from the truth (the facts) of the matter – namely, that there is no evidence that a purported 33kg bomb was detonated at the Ariana Grande concert at Manchester Arena on 22nd May, 2017.
Secondly, this has most thoroughly and, to demonstrable ill-effect, resulted in her issuing a palpably void order.

void | void |

adjective
1 not valid or legally binding: the contract was void.
• (of speech or action) ineffectual; useless: all the stratagems you’ve worked out are rendered void.
2 completely empty: void spaces surround the tanks.
• [predicative] (void of) free from; lacking: what were once the masterpieces of literature are now void of meaning.
formal (of an office or position) vacant.ORIGIN

noun
1 a completely empty space: the black void of space.
• an unfilled space in a wall, building, or other structure.
• an emptiness caused by the loss of something: the void left by the death of his wife.

Middle English (in the sense ‘unoccupied’): from a dialect variant of Old French vuide; related to Latin vacare ‘vacate’; the verb partly a shortening of avoid, reinforced by Old French voider.

As a consequence of this, she has perverted the course of the Law.

Therefore, the pantomime dame has fallen into a courtly chasm; the only way out of which is her resignation. (I realise, of course, that this is unlikely to happen in the Freemasonic Legal World she inhabits, where the modus operandi is to lie and cover up the crimes of one’s fellow members of the BAR/Brotherhood).

As is amply demonstrated in this Rogue Cast Dame Steyn’s judgement – all 64 pages of it – is a Lawful nullity. it is VOID. From the moment it was issued and delivered, dead on arrival, it is and always was dead as a dodo, a dead delivery, a miscarriage of justice that is morally repugnant to any one who stands under Natural Law, as expressed so marvellously in the maxim,

“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.”

If I were in Richard D Hall’s shoes, I would refuse to accept the order on the basis that it is void. For more on void orders, watch this and read the accompanying essay.

The Rogue Cast also covers the sad death of Peter Lynch, whose suicide in prison could reasonably be attributed to a certain man acting as Judge called Jeremy Richardson:

It is not unreasonable to suggest that Jeremy Richardson has demonstrated himself to be a prime example of a man who is actively perverting the course of justice. Indeed, it is to be noted that, by being overly-lenient on a predatory paedophile and so heavy-handed in his condemnation and sentencing of Peter Lynch, he has grossly perverted the Law in every sense of the term.

There is an ancient saying that goes along the lines of,

Mankind will not be free until the last priest has been strangled in the entrails of the last lawyer

The veracity of the adage, I would posit, is undeniable, if somewhat grotesque. The point is well-made: the current Legal system is rotten to its core and can only be rectified by its demolition, to be replaced by the Ancient and Natural Law. A real rogue or errant is the individual who places no man-made institution of tyranny between himself and the true God who created him.

As always, thank you for watching this discourse and reading my writings. If you are able, please chuck a few quid in the coffers by way of the Buy Me a Coffee button and/or take out a subscription to my Substack pages.

Alternatively, appreciation may be made by way of a donation in crypto,

Bitcoin receive address: 178UdeXRTSs1hyYHCNDoTPBCDMyUMwyFrE
ETH receive address: 0xdeBBd545FcFB535198227B832299983bC258F32c

October 29, 2024 3

Out of the shadows.

For whatever reason, my content at RogueMale is Shadow Banned on a variety of platforms – X, Facebook and Google/YouTube. The evidence for this can be seen instantly by visiting any of one of those limited hangouts and seeing the statistics for yourself.

“Shadow banning, also called stealth banning, hellbanning, ghost banning, and comment ghosting, is the practice of blocking or partially blocking a user or the user’s content from some areas of an online community in such a way that the ban is not readily apparent to the user, regardless of whether the action is taken by an individual or an algorithm. For example, shadow-banned comments posted to a blog or media website would be visible to the sender, but not to other users accessing the site.

The phrase “shadow banning” has a colloquial history and has undergone some usage evolution. It originally applied to a deceptive sort of account suspension on web forums, where a person would appear to be able to post while actually having all of their content hidden from other users. More recently, the term has come to apply to alternative measures, particularly visibility measures like delisting and downranking.

By partly concealing, or making a user’s contributions invisible or less prominent to other members of the service, the hope may be that in the absence of reactions to their comments, the problematic or otherwise out-of-favour user will become bored or frustrated and leave the site, and that spammers and trolls will be discouraged to continue their unwanted behavior or create new accounts.” Wikipedia

And yet, as I’ll demonstrate below, the comments from those who have watched my content is very positive. So, why are the numbers of apparently low engagement? Why is the work I put out being shadow-banned and what can I do about it?

Life is a perpetual game of Hide and Seek shadow play. I am now closing in on my 50th episode of the Rogue Cast and, modesty aside, I am invariably satisfied with the content. For now, it generally takes the form of a walk and talk, in which I literally ramble over the local landscapes of Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire whilst discoursing on a variety of subjects which are of interest to me and my readers/viewers/listeners.

Each RogueCast posted at RM has an accompanying article with links and sources to the material and, of course, there is also a large collection of writings on a variety of subjects, including the Great British Mortgage Swindle, a coruscating documentary co-produced by Michael O’Bernicia and yours truly.

This is a collection of comments from my recent Rogue Cast on YT, some of which, if not all, are being hidden from view, according to one of my viewers.

@six-blade5992

“Great commentary, mate….I’ve now watched several of your vids and shared them about ….Not many people talk about (or even know about) the Trivium method, so good on you explaining it…”

@fieryflowergirl5095

2 days ago
“More great truth. Why so many people cannot see through the veil, which is now so thin as to be virtually transparent, is beyond me. Richard D Hall has my backing. Listened to Iain Davis being interviewed by Gemma O’D outside the courts, another good man. Thanks Michael.”

@haydnhades2730
2 days ago

“I find myself very much looking forward to your walks and talks and I thank you for them. Just as with the attempts to have us queue up to be William Shakespeared in recent years, those of us who retain the ability to see and think clearly must deepen our lines drawn in the sand. We may seem to be assailed from all sides, but be assured there exists a way through this upside-down reality for each of us, and perhaps in different ways. Although not religious I do believe we are living through the last attempt to disseminate something called Common Sense (the highest form of Intelligence) in the realm of mankind.”

@vibetone355
2 days ago

“Considering humans only populate 3% of the planet, the inner earth theory is definitely something to consider, UAPs or UFOs apparently use anti gravity crafts to fly around in, also something to do with magnetism, earth’s core giant magnet maybe a fuel source?? Another ramble in the bramble nice weather to enjoy, keep well and safe.”

It is fair to state that in no way am I in this for the ‘money‘ – I do it because I love it and have been writing since I was a child.

However, if we take the maxim, Credit where Credit is Due, is it unreasonable to expect some kind of exchange from those appreciative of my work? And, is it not the case that ‘money’ is above all else but a medium of spiritual exchange, albeit one that is vastly controlled by the hidden financiers who promulgate fake debt and usury?

I would posit that is a reasonable take on the situation and so, from now on, I will be making only introductory content for YouTube which will direct viewers to the full Rogue Cast on other, less restrictive channels.

As to my X account, I may simply phase it out. After all, the wonderful audience for my work can simply subscribe to my email list on this site and receive notifications that way. I really couldn’t give a hoot about Musk’s platform, when it has a CEO who preaches the false and duplicitous doctrine that users will have,

“Freedom of speech, but not of reach.”

and uses ‘Gov issued I.D”, which along with all their data, is processed and held by a former Israeli/Mossad agency. The ‘blue tick’ of verification, which costs around £7 a month, means that these agencies have your data and that data is sold on to the industrial military complex who may use it against you in these 2-Tiered times of dystopian technocracy, as exemplifed by the traitor Keir Starmer’s treacherous diktats.

None of which, of course, explains why this humble website and its associated content is shadow-banned. It is evident to me that the Wiki quote above pinpoints the issue here,

“the hope may be that in the absence of reactions to their comments, the problematic or otherwise out-of-favour user will become bored or frustrated and leave the site…”

However, that won’t work because I will continue to write and produce my Rogue podcasts regardless of the limitations on my potential audience on the simple basis I enjoy doing it and others appreciate it.

Is the shadow-banning an overreaction to my work? What is it in my content that merits such an over-zealous ban across these platforms? I’ll be interested to read your comments and/or any suggestions readers may have for extending my audiences.

In the meantime, thank you to all who have taken the time to comment and who subscribe to Rogue Male and an especial thanks to those who made donations via the Buy Me A Coffee button.

August 14, 2024 4

Fallacies Abound – a ramble Far From the Madding Crowd

How the Fallacies of the captured British State will be its undoing.

Fearful of the Madding Crowd’s rejection of his WEF diktats, Agent Keir Starmer, reliant entirely on logical fallacies, continues to pump out the empty rhetoric which is spoon-fed via the usual propaganda channels to a British public which has had enough.

In this latest RogueCast, I take a ramble through the woodland around the remains of Beauvale Priory, Nottinghamshire. It covers a decimation of the empty rhetoric of WEF Agent Starmer, the fallacies of a broken justice system, the Luciferian tone of David Icke’s work, two-tier policing, the dangers of inbreeding and my take on the recent harassment trial of Richard D Hall, which is, again, another example of how logical fallacies fall apart in the face of the facts, logic and reason.

Indeed, the Richard D Hall High Court trial has backfired as the harassment case against him is demonstrably ill-founded to the point where the co-claimant, Mr Hibbert’s daughter (represented by his ex-wife) is proven to have no knowledge or understanding of the actual claim. In other words, the prosecution failed to demonstrate its case. By standing his ground, Richard Hall has blown wide open the facts surrounding the false flag event of the Manchester Arena in 2017. Only a fool would have brought such a claim in the first place and, by ill-advisedly filing it in the High Court, the facts of the matter are now in the public domain.

It would appear that those influential parties who persuaded the mendacious Mr Hibbert to sue Richard D Hall for harassment may well be agents of MI5/the BBC, with a certain Miss Marianna Spring being a central character in the operation to silence Hall.

The blunder is further exacerbated by the fact that Iain Davis who was present in the High Court for the 4-day trial and who wrote a very good 4-part article about it, has also now written a book on the Manchester Arena staged false flag event. Both men back up their rhetoric with data points, logic and reason. This is in marked contrast to the claims of Hibbert, which are demonstrably full of empty rhetoric, being supported only by logical fallacies and no evidence other than appeals to emotion – I felt this, I felt that, I feel this, I feel that…

David Icke remains an interesting character/player who reveals much about the nature of our perceived reality. However, I take issue with his theory that we are ruled by “non-human” entities who are inhabiting the avatars of men when there is no historical evidence of any E.T involvement in the affairs of Mankind. Indeed, Icke may well be promoting a Luciferian view that is more in line with the satanic teachings of Madame Blavatsky and Aleister Crowley than the truth. For the last 80 years, the public has been brainwashed into believing in the existence of aliens from outer space threatening the existence of human life. This is adult fantasy, a fairy tale that encourages us to look up to the skies rather than consider the substantial body of evidence that points to a civilisation of peoples which exists deep underground, the legendary realms of Shangri La, Agartha, of vast realms under the Arctic and Antarctic.

And, of course, it is a well-observed fact that Mr Icke never offers any solutions or suggestions for effective courses of action that would serve to empower the people standing up to the tyranny manifesting around them.

The recent examples of the treacherous two tier policing that is happening across these lands is mirrored by the behaviour of those pen-pushers sitting as deputy district judges/stipends in the Magistrates Courts who are currently meting out unlawful sentences against the native Britons whilst foreign immigrants are out on the streets, in full view of the traitor police constables, brandishing machetes and knives and engaging in various acts of public disorder. All of it ignored by Agent Starmer, the complicit judiciary and a dunderhead constable of the Met.

Whilst many alarmists will proffer the view that ‘the UK has fallen’ or that we are about to descend into a totalitarian system of governance, I take a more optimistic view.

Why? Because, in the end, facts, logic and reason are all that will be left standing in the face of such an impotent regime that is utterly devoid of truth. In the final act of this perversion of justice, the truth will out.

As I said previously, now is the time for clear heads and stout hearts. The truth, backed by facts, logic and reason is our ultimate weapon, so don the armour of God, stand your ground and remember, it is a spiritual war on the collective that is to be won by the individual taking action in his perceived reality.

Many thanks for watching. Should you wish to support the work at RogueMale, please click on the ‘buy me a coffee’ button to donate a few quid. Thank you very much.

August 11, 2024 4

Tag: logical fallacies