Author: ROGUE MALE

Sovereign Being Under Natural Law. Educator. Anarchist. Occasional podcaster. Co-producer & protagonist in the film, The Great British Mortgage Swindle. Founding Trustee of Universal Community Trust. Lives in Bernicia & Deira, one of the Stolen Ancestral Lands of Northern Britain.

A Winter of Discontent

In which the Rogue Male discourses on this Winter of Discontent, State Plunder, the Inevitability of the Swing to the Reich (sic) and how the Dissenting Individual is More Powerful than He Realises. The discourse continues with a discussion of how his good friend Dave’s Claim of Mortgage Fraud against a UK Lender was Railroaded by a masonic Judge and a Mr Laville, barrister of the Inner Temple, which is a Further Example of the Two Tier Justice System that is Rigged in Favour of the Criminal Financiers.

Topics covered in this discourse over a Winter of Discontent:

  1. State Plunder
  2. Back on the Farm – episode 71
  3. Swing of the pendulum
  4. Trump playing role of the Jesuit ‘saviour’ and Musk his Freemasonic sidekick
  5. Controlling the script – eg no more trans-gender nonsense
  6. All taxation is theft – similar reveal going on Isles of Britain – Albanian prison electric cards
    African promotion of trans-gender nonsense.
  7. Billions of pounds of stolen moneys/energies transferred to foreign states in furtherance of bogus agendas.
  8. How the British peoples have had enough – exemplified by treatment of immigrants from theft of energies
  9. US Congress woman Elizabeth Warren’s massive increase in her assets
  10. The funnelling of energies money and plunder into pockets of geo-political puppets.
  11. How Council tax is on increase and the rise in people stopping paying it.
  12. No taxation without representation
  13. DOGE audits continuing to reveal the theft plunder and misappropriation of credits
  14. How charity begins at home
  15. How the plunder is directly from native peoples of US and Europe
  16. How the Trans-Atlantic actions will similarly occur in Northern Europe
  17. The Mortgage Monkey – revealed demonstrable fraud of any and all mortgages
  18. Bait and switch – how the mortgage racket is built on fraud.
  19. How the Promise to pay is what creates the credit, which is also true of bank notes
  20. Dave’s situation – how the UK Courts are operating a 2 tier justice system in favour of the credit controllers.
  21. How the Court issued a Void possession order and the decision for Dave to go in as the Claimant
  22. N1 Application for a Declaration that the possession order was founded on an illegal deed of mortgage:
  23. Sir Ross Cranston, former solicitor General in Blair’s government
  24. How mortgage strikes would have a Deleterious effect on the financiers’ profiteering
  25. The Mortgage industry is a multi billion pound racket
  26. The Monetary mechanics of any and all loans
  27. How on 12th February, 2025, the Judge determined Dave’s claim was an abuse of process when, in fact, it the financiers and courts that are abusing the process of credit creation
  28. Mortgage strikes – people refusing, individually and en masse to pay
  29. Bring courts to a standstill and deny fake lenders their income streams
  30. USAID – United States Agency International Development
  31. The demiurge – to whom Musk and Trump have sworn allegiance
  32. The Time is ripe to take advantage of the unveiling – the one ring to control it all is the credit system
  33. Taking advantage of the pendulum’s swing – courts manifestly not going to support the people, so it behoves them to take action individually.
  34. The misrepresentations of the solicitor and barrister representing the Nationwide ‘lender.’
  35. How the Antidote to state sponsored fraud and collectivist mind control lies entirely within the individual
  36. The Conclusion: when the individual takes action, things happen for the best, one door closes, another opens. This winter of discontent will eventually end.

Thank you for listening to this discourse. As ever, I am very grateful to those who have chucked a few quid into the coffers by way of the  Buy Me a Coffee button and/or have taken out a subscription to my Substack pages where, if you like, you can also support me by taking out a paid subscription which will grant you ‘first dibs’ on my output.

 

1

The Rise of the Taxi Wallah.

A wallah is defined as,

 

wal·lah | ˈwälə |
noun [in combination or with modifier] Indian or informal
a person concerned or involved with a specified thing or business: a rickshaw-wallah.

• a native or inhabitant of a specified place: Bombay wallahs.

ORIGIN
from the Hindi suffix -vālā ‘doer’ (commonly interpreted in the sense ‘fellow’), from Sanskrit pālaka ‘keeper’.

Why are British councils licencing thousands of wallahs to drive taxis?

Take a taxi in any British town or city and it is most likely that the driver is from Bangladesh or Pakistan and not a native of the Isles of Britain. Why might this be the case?

Almost four years ago, I had an altercation with a neighbour who goes by the name Masood.

He is a licenced taxi driver of the Mohammedan religion and he is from Pakistan. I had parallel-parked my car in a tight space between his vehicle and the one in front, whilst he was sat in the driver’s seat.

In his heavily-accented and broken English, he grumbled that I had made it very difficult for him to get out. Reasoning that he is, after all, a ‘professional’ driver and that he should have the levels of skill necessary to get out of the space, I told him that I needed to be parked there, outside the house as I had two small children and an assortment of luggage to unload.

Although he had a sensor on his Toyota hybrid car, he reversed, albeit gently, into the vehicle behind him. At this point he jumped out and started shouting, “You fooking bastard, I fooking kill you!”

His wife came out and pulled him away, thus preventing what may have turned into a bout of fisticuffs.

It is a minor event but I cite it as an example of the manifest lack of skill he has as a ‘professional’ driver and his unreasonable behaviour, by which I mean his inability to keep his temper.

In the parlance of his own country, Masood is a taxi wallah and he is one of tens of thousands operating around the towns and cities of Britain right now.

Of course, not all wallahs drive taxis. some work on electric bicycles, travelling around with large square backpacks on their shoulders, delivering pizzas and fast-food to customers in exchange – literally – for a few credits.

Delivery wallahs, Whitechapel, London.

In fact, it is fair to state that over the last 3 decades or so, the UK’s taxi, bicycle and home delivery services have become monopolised by Pakistani muslims and other immigrants.

Travel to Pakistan, India or the Far East countries like Vietnam or Thailand and you will immediately notice the proliferation of the rickshaw – a pedal or mechanised 3 wheel carriage.

 

In India, the drivers are called Rickshaw Wallahs:

Invariably, and I write from direct experience of my time in India, Nepal and Thailand, there are more rickshaws available than customer demand. This means that many of the wallahs are under-employed and spend their time snoozing in the back of their taxis/rickshaws. Fair enough, one might say.

As one might expect, many of the immigrants who come to the Isles of Britain immediately look for work as taxi drivers. Taxi drivers are, in effect, government operatives as they are, by definition, taxing individuals for their journeys.

The historical origins of the taxi service lie in the 19th century:

taxi (n.)

1907, shortening of taximeter cab (they were introduced in London in March 1907), from taximeter “automatic meter to record the distance and fare” (1898), from French taximètre, from German Taxameter (1890), coined from Medieval Latin taxa “tax, charge” (see tax (n.)) + meter (n.3). An earlier English form was taxameter (1894), used in horse-drawn cabs.

To become a licenced taxi driver, one has to apply for the licence via the local council. All well and good, one might state.

However, it appears that the application process has become monopolised and, in particular, by Wolverhampton city council which operates a stream-lined process . Here is a comment on You Tube made in relation to the operation,

It took me 7 months to get my PHV licence from start to finish. That is including getting my vehicle and getting it fully insured and licenced. And the fact that it takes Wolverhampton a fraction of that time is in fact worrying. I live next door to Rotherham, and the effects of that are still felt today within the taxi industry. The fact that it takes days, instead of months within Wolverhampton should be alarm bells in the first place.

Seemingly, it is not necessary for the licencee to even live in the city,

“The majority of the private hire vehicle licences issued in Wolverhampton were registered to drivers outside of the city. Only 1,310 were currently registered to residents, with a whopping 95.5 per cent of applicants living elsewhere.

Taxis with Wolverhampton plates have been spotted in Manchester, Bury and York, according to recent social media posts. One X user also highlighted an “increasing numbers of cars in Blackburn”, adding: “Anyone know what that’s all about? It’s not as though the two places are cheek by jowl, is it?”

City of Wolverhampton Council has previously denied it was ‘quicker and easier’ to get a private hire licence with them, having come under fire for licensing cabbies from outside the area. It said while it didn’t “actively encourage” applications from ‘out of towners’, many favoured its “efficient, yet rigorous, licensing process”. Source

 

An article in Bolton News, states,

“More than a third of private hire taxi drivers in Greater Manchester (GM) are licensed by a council that operates around 80 miles away in Wolverhampton.

According to a Freedom of Information (FOI) request submitted by the Local Democracy Reporting Service, 8,952 private hire drivers, licensed by City Of Wolverhampton Council reside in GM.

This makes up 35 per cent of the private hire cabs operating across the city-region.” Source

The money-making scheme/scam of Wolverhampton Council has meant that,

“Wolverhampton has become a major hub for licensing due to its streamlined process, lower costs, and quicker turnaround times. This has led to a surge in drivers choosing Wolverhampton over local councils, even if they never intend to work there.”  Source

Now, whilst I appreciate that my views are anecdotal, they are based on my direct experience of the levels of competency demonstrated by the plethora of taxi wallahs that operate around Nottingham. In the main, the levels of competency are poor and are characterised by a lack of awareness of how to position their vehicles when turning right and a general inability to be courteous, without so much as a raised hand to show appreciation of a fellow motorist granting them right of way in a congested road.

In a recent Wolverhampton Council meeting, John Roseblade, Director of Resident Services, stated that,

“As (of) 1st July, we licenced 45k licenced drivers and just under 30k private hire.”  source

As always, when one follows the money, it becomes apparent that the Council is making large profits from its stream-lined application service.

Additionally, there are demonstrable connections with Muslim taxi drivers and the endemic Child Sexual Abuse (CSA) cases that have been documented in towns like Rotherham, Rochdale, Telford, Oldham, Huddersfield and elsewhere,

Aware that taxi drivers were offering children rides for sex, in 2006 it (Telford Council) suspended licensing enforcement for drivers, allowing high risk drivers to continue practicing. As the Telford Inquiry found, this was “borne entirely out of fear of accusations of racism; it was craven”. Source

Whilst I do not doubt that there may well be a minority of these taxi wallahs who are competent, the question remains – why are there so many plying their business around the Isles of Britain? Do we really need them and what impact has this had on the native population’s drivers? Have they been priced out? Is it simply a money-making scam or is there something sinister going on?

Of equal significance, is it not high time that multi-culturalism is declared to be a failed experiment?

Thank you for reading this essay. As ever, I am very grateful to those who have chucked a few quid into the coffers by way of the  Buy Me a Coffee button and/or have taken out a subscription to my Substack pages where, if you like, you can also support me by taking out a paid subscription which will grant you ‘first dibs’ on my output.

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

The Pendulum Swings

It is a law of physics that a pendulum will always swing back to its opposite position.


“This island is made mainly of coal and surrounded by fish. Only an organizing genius could produce a shortage of coal and fish at the same time.” Aneurin Bevan Daily Herald, 25 May 1945.

The geopolitical stage is populated by fools of astonishing levels of inadequacy and, lest we forget, it is and has always been a pantomime served up for the moronic, a theatrical distraction in which the ‘villains’ and the ‘saviours’ (like Trump) are controlled and scripted by the Freemasonic Sorcerers and Financiers who only inhabit the shadows behind the curtain.

One such villainous fookwit is the character known as Ed Milliband. Born of an immigrant Jewish family, he is playing the role of the Energy Secretary in the reviled Keir Stalin’s fake government.

The character, Aneurin Bevan, whilst being an actor on the geopolitical stage, at least had a streak of common sense running through his veins.

No such sense can be attributed to Milliband, a man who is as an inept and fraudulent as the woman who currently holds the honourable office of Chancellor.

Whilst Bevan may have been afflicted with the tyrannical strain of communism, his common sense was applied when required. The very opposite of Milliband who cannot even eat a bacon butty without mishap (left) (why would a Jew eat one anyway?).

The fact is plain to state: by following the fraudulent Net Zero doctrine of his WEF overlords, Milliband is a traitor. The promotion of such a ridiculous policy is part of the demoralisation programme that has targeted the Isles of Britain to the point where we are no longer self-sufficient.

Our ancestors, in direct contradiction to the miseducated and deceived populace of the times we live in, were in tune with the most elemental aspects of the natural world: they worked with nature, not against. Fishing, animal husbandry, farming techniques, the traditional trades of carpentry, stone masonry and building, genuine medicine that used nature’s resources, the weaving of cloth from the wool provided by the hardy sheep perfectly suited to the environment, shoemaking and diet were the activities of an intelligent peoples who, as evidenced by the Peoples’s Revolution of 1381 and the Luddites defiance, both in the face of a profiteering genocide which sort to wipe them out, stood their ground and fought for what was right.

How far we have declined as a nation may be measured in the demise of these activities and the theft of the natural resources [gas, oil and coal reserves] which truly belong to the people and not those gargantuan monoliths of psychopathic extortion and thievery as so perfectly exemplified by SERCO, a nefarious organisation whose dastardly operations are overseen by Rupert and Nicholas Soames, the Toad-of-Toad Hall brothers and grandsons of Winston ‘Rothschild’ Churchill, the alcoholic war-mongering old soak and prince of toads himself.

Ship-building, fishing fleets, iron and steel can also be added to the list of decimated industries.

Indeed, as a relevant aside, consider how the price of the traditionally cheap and nutritious meal of fish and chips, cooked in beef dripping, has gone through the roof to the point where it is now often over £10 for a portion when the fact is our seas are teeming with fish.

Then we have the absurdity of Britain importing energy from abroad when the fact is that there are massive reserves of fuel which could satisfy any and all energy requirements,

“UK Coal Reserves


“Economically recoverable coal reserves for existing deep mines and opencast sites in Britain are estimated to be around 400 million tonnes.
However, the total potential British coal reserves are much larger.

The Coal Authority, the body responsible for directing the British coal industry, has indicated that in 2005 coal resources at existing deep mines and existing, planned and known potential surface-mining sites were in the order of 900 million tonnes, with approximately one-third in deep mines and two-thirds at surface-mining sites.

Additional recoverable tonnages considered to be potentially available from new or expanded deep-mining operations amounted to almost 1.4 billion tonnes!!

Unlike gas and oil which are now mainly imported (Government consultants forecast that up to 90% of our gas requirements will need to be imported by 2020), coal is still a plentiful indigenous resource.

Coal and UK Power Generation

35 per cent of UK power is generated by coal fired power stations. However during the periods of peak demand, coal stations can be ramped up to provide 47 per cent of Britain’s power compared to gas stations at around 34 per cent and nuclear stations at around 19 per cent.

Coal is the only fuel that can be relied upon to match these periodic sudden increases in demand so is absolutely vital for Britain’s energy future.
Renewables, including wind and hydro power, collectively produce less than 1 per cent of national peak-time needs!!

Ratcliffe-on–Soar power station in Nottinghamshire was capable of generating 2,000 MW which can supply the energy needs of 2 million people.” source

Milliband is as far out-of-step with the facts as could be imagined: if he thinks that a net zero policy will benefit the world, then how does he account for the fact that India and China are, right now, building new coal burning power stations in order to supply their energy needs?

Furthermore, his nonsense fails to take into account the fact that increasingly sophisticated filtration systems are capable of completely removing any pollutants resultant from coal-fired power stations.

Milliband is but a puppetician, a front man acting on behalf of his hidden financial overlords. Nothing he claims can be backed up by the facts.

The pendulum is swinging from left to right, just as was always the intention as the woke agenda was always unsustainable. Trump, the actor, is playing the role of saviour and is taking advantage of the swing to bring into existence a Christo-Zionist Third Reich, with all that that entails.

There is nothing that can stop that swing which necessarily means Keir Stalin and his sidekick Milliband are hopelessly lost in their various frauds and promotion of communist policies.

Their demise is inevitable.

Thank you for reading this essay. As ever, I am very grateful to those who have chucked a few quid into the coffers by way of the  Buy Me a Coffee button and/or have taken out a subscription to my Substack pages where, if you like, you can also support me by taking out a paid subscription which will grant you ‘first dibs’ on my output.

1

Kicker Conspiracy: Football is a Freemasonic Game

and the Stadia are Harvesting Energy.

Here’s the kicker: ever since I was a young lad, and that is a long time ago, I have been interested in the sport officially known as Association Football.

Whilst I stopped playing some years ago, my allegiance or support for the Football club known as Huddersfield Town has lingered on to the point where I do, occasionally, watch a live-stream of one of their matches.

The former stadium of Huddersfield Town, demolished in 1994.

I’m not going too far into the how and why I began to support them at an early age. All that needs to be said is that is a familiar tale of a fascination that grew from the moment I went to an evening game under the floodlights at the old Leeds Road stadium (left). As my dad and I emerged to stand on the massive terrace to look down upon the pristine emerald pitch, I was captivated. My allegiance from that point was to the team in blue and white stripes.

On 30th March, 2002, one of the fake royals known ‘affectionately’ (as the sycophantic media would have it) as the Queen Mother died. On 1st April, two days later, I was at a football game between Huddersfield Town and Oldham Athletic. To my great chagrin and disbelief, it was announced that before the game kicked off there would be minute’s silence for her. Of the 14,343 spectators in the ground, I must have been one of a handful who did not stand up when the moment came. None of my companions joined me in remaining seated: each dutifully took to his feet, along with the thousands who did the same. Such deference, particularly en-masse, is an anachronism that may be explained by the levels of media propaganda that the population is subjected to.

It was at that point that any lingering sense of connection or bon-homie with my fellow ‘supporters’ began to wane – fookwittery knows no bounds and its existence amongst millions of football fans has merely deepened down the ensuing years. If you doubt the truth of that comment, then take a look at the number of deaths of professional footballers and fans at games and consider why no one is capable of making the connection between the increase in heart-related issues since the roll out of the deadly injections of a test serum that began in 2021.

Nobody puts two and two together, despite the professional game seemingly plagued by injuries to players who were, for the most part, recipients of the 3 Dart Finish in the form of the experimental serum of death commonly known as the Covid-19|Divoc-91 inoculation. The following quotation is about Tottenham Hotspur FC but could be about many of the clubs who insisted their valuable players took the serum,

“Almost all of Tottenham’s 26-man first team squad were injured at some point in the 2023 Premier League campaign and the 2024 season is not proving to be much better.

Ange Postecoglou had 22 of his players out at some point of the season, with 37 separate injuries recorded overall. In their worst-hit week, Postecoglou had nine players absent as many players suffered more than one injury.”

Nobody notices as fans drop in the stands from heart-attacks, nor, for instance, why the Luton player, Adam Lockyer, had two heart attacks on the field of play or why his football club were so proud of vaccinating their entire playing squad. Lower down the football pyramid, the notorious mass murderer, Dr Jonathan Van Tam, took part in a photo opportunity in which he was seen to be jabbing the players of Boston Utd, with which ‘Dr Death’ has a number of links. Even though nobody within the sport seems to care, let’s get on with the game.

In 2021, I wrote an essay entitled, ‘They shoot, footballers, don’t they?’ in which I questioned exactly why the various football clubs (I don’t know if it was all) took such a risk to their prized assets’ heath by having them play Russian Roulette with the vile vials.

My conclusion was that football clubs are just like any other organisation – whether of the state or corporate worlds – they are populated by arrogant morons who, when it boils down to it, know fook all about the nature of this reality but almost everything there is to know about finance (though not its monetary mechanics).

Who is being played?

Whether the individual is one of the 22 (a popular freemasonic number) on the pitch or one of the thousands in the stadium, he is being played.

By which I mean that he is being used for various purposes.

The first purpose is to generate and then harvest his energy by way of currency (‘money’ or, more accurately, ‘credits’).

As always, it is important to consider the narratives that are offered up concerning the origins of the regulated game of football,

“The origins of modern soccer came from English and Scottish villages. Mob football probably started as a way of celebrating a military victory, as early as the Viking period. The game consisted of crowds madly attempting to get an inflated pig’s bladder from one goal to the other, and apparently anything shy of actually murdering each other was permitted. The game was eventually outlawed, but it evolved into an only slightly less violent version for another five centuries.

In the 1820s, the game became popular at English boys’s schools like Eton, Harrow, Rugby and Westminster, without the murderous intent. Each school developed its own rules, and the game was played in a field with no boundaries.

Association football was born in 1863 at the Freemason’s Arms Pub near London’s Covent Garden, at 81-82 Long Acre. Six meetings were held at the pub to decide on rules and structure, and the meetings ended with a split between the new Football Association (“soccer” is said to be a truncated version of “association”) and the proponents of different rules that became rugby.

The Freemason’s Arms pub was built in 1860 and is still open today. It began life as the Freemason’s Tavern, which originally stood where the United Grand Lodge of England’s New Connaught Rooms are today on Great Queen Street. London’s Freemasons’ Hall is literally right across the street.” source

Competitors from the opposing teams, the Up’ards and the Down’ards, reach for the ball during the annual Royal Shrovetide Football Match in Ashbourne, northern England, on February 28, 2017.
The mass-participation ball game involves two teams, whose players are defined by which side of a small brook that bisects the town they were born, aiming to score a goal, which are some three miles apart. The game, which has very few rules, is played over two 8 hour periods on Shrove Tuesday and Ash Wednesday. Royal Shrovetide Football is believed to have been played annually in Ashbourne since 1667.

Therefore, it is plain to state that the game of football, in its original form(s), was largely a free-for-all in which there were virtually no rules – you could kick the ball, hold it, punch it, throw it, wrestle it from your opponent but the object was always to get it over a line and score a goal.

The remnants of this original form of the game can be see to this day, as, for example, in the Derbyshire town of Ashbourne and its Shrove Tuesday match between the townsmen (see image above).

If we take the divide and rule tactic of Freemasonry – as exemplified by it set-square and compass symbol:

Elon Musk’s X platform’s freemasonic logo.

we instantly note that this juncture of the two is exactly the X logo of Elon Musk’s ‘twitter/X’ social media platform (above). From which it would seem logical to state that the regulated sport of Association Football was created by the captured operation that is Freemasonry and that X is also a Freemasonic platform.

Mind control of the people is and has always been the aim as has the control of the masses by regulation of the currency (money, or more accurately, credit creation), but how many stop to contemplate the fact that, as with every mechanism of control – education, the media, the health system, geopolitics et al – there is also an energetic transfer or harvesting taking place?

The huge amounts of credit that swirl around the professional sport of football are manifestly proof of the fact that it is ultimately controlled and utilised by the hidden financiers who run the governments – all dominated by freemasonry. Another consideration is the amount of money the average fan spends in support of his club for season tickets, refreshments and all forms of merchandise, all of which is, in and of itself, an energetic harvesting – a redirecting of currency into the pockets of the  approved wealthy owners and their creditors.

The Field of play.

A key aspect of the regulated sport of football began when the ‘Brethren’, using a set square and compass, drew up the field markings and pitch dimensions on which the game was to be played and to which any and all football teams had to agree to. Given the fact we live in a simulated constructed, it logicaly follows that we are in an informed field, which we are able to tap into. This is sometimes called the Akashic record.

Interestingly, the field is often referred to as the pitch, the main definition of which is,

1 | piCH |
noun
1 the quality of a sound governed by the rate of vibrations producing it; the degree of highness or lowness of a tone: a car engine seems to change pitch downward as the vehicle passes you.

a standard degree of highness or lowness used in performance: the guitars were strung and tuned to pitch. See also concert pitch.

Middle English (as a verb in the senses ‘thrust (something pointed) into the ground’ and ‘fall headlong’): perhaps related to Old English picung ‘stigmata

In the linked video at the foot of this article the point is made that there is a geometrical dimension to the markings and that, when expanded into 3D, a pyramid appears. In an informed field symbols proliferate. This is how the resultant geometrical shapes may be used to affect the field of play. The video explains it very well and for that reason, I would recommend watching it for a deeper explanation than I offer here.

The field markings can be visualised to reveal a 3D pyramid.
The stadium is like a stargate – a circle around a pyramid.

Every game has an atmosphere generated by the polarity of the two sets of supporters and this, as the game unfolds, is intensified to produce a swing-o-meter of emotions – an energetic field like that between the positive and negative poles of a battery or a magnetic field.

The larger the crowd in attendance, the greater this field and the more intense it becomes by way of the stadium design and shape around which the energy flows.

Whilst I appreciate this may seem a preposterous suggestion, could it be that this energy is being harvested/collected as an energetic offerering in an esoteric ritual to the false god of freemasonry, Jabalon?

The passions generated by the ‘great’ game and its false rivalries are another aspect of this – but the fighting fans of yesteryear were, more or less, curtailed from there activities, at least inside the grounds, when all-seater stadia were introduced after the engineered deaths of 96 fans at Hillsborough, Sheffield in 1986. All-seating stadia was always about control – a heaving mass of supporters on the terracing being far more unpredictable than stands of individually allocated seating. The theatres of football thus became more genteel, more diluted and more easily surveilled by the burgeoning proliferation of CCTV.

The effect of which was to remove the boisterousness (and unchanelled energy) of the fans – an aspect which was referred to by some as the gentrification of the game. This continues asunder with Everton Football Club’s new ground built at Liverpool docks being but the latest example:

Everton FC’s new ground – notice the circuit like structure and the fact that there is water on 3 sides.
Notice the juxtaposition of the old world architecture alongside the inferior new construct.

This gentrification was, of course, the intention behind the codifying of football through the regulation of the field of play and the new rules that were introduced by the self-appointed and still-dominant freemasonic overlords who took over the game in the 1860s.

There is, of course, nothing new in this – stadia, in the form of amphitheatres and colosseums, have existed for millennia and invariably were but earlier incarnations of the Bread and Circuses that were specifically deployed as a means of mass-distraction and to divide and rule the populace- as symbolised by the square and compass of freemasonry.

The question that arose for me was what would finally break any lingering interest I have in the sport?

The realisation that it is but one gigantic means of stealing one’s attention as well as one’s moneys is certainly a factor in the decimation of my fondness for the game. However, the final nail in the coffin of my false attachment has been the discovery that not only is the professional game a circus show of distraction, featuring highly-paid (credited) athletes and a time-proven tool for the divide and conquer modus operandi (MO) of those who manipulate Mankind’s minds but that it is also, in all likelihood, directly linked and in service to the Freemasonic false deity they call Jabalon. After all, why would I wish to give any of my attention to  thought form of a fake god who purports to rule this world?

Just as with everything in this realm that is good, the Freemasonic sorcerers have inverted the game of football, regulated it and used it for a massive energy extraction. If that knowledge does not sever any lingering interest I had, then I don’t know what will.

 

Thank you for reading this essay. As ever, I am very grateful to those who have chucked a few quid into the coffers by way of the  Buy Me a Coffee button and/or have taken out a subscription to my Substack pages where, if you like, you can also support me by taking out a paid subscription which will grant you ‘first dibs’ on my output.

 

Further reading: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3308796/Freemasons-Utd.html
https://masonry101.com/english-footballs-ties-with-freemasonry/

Further viewing – this video, by Michelle Gibson and Chad Williams, explores the notion that the energy of the spectators is being generated and harvested and that the suggestion by the character Morpheus in the Matrix  that humans are being used as batteries may relate to the ways in which all spectator sports have a field of play whose dimensions are of a sacred geometrical pattern that creates such an energy flow as may be observed between magnetic polarities and the electrical fields of batteries.

 

 

7

Back On The Farm

A conversation with Dominic and Christian of the Sheep Farm Podcast.

After a hiatus, I’m back with a rather different episode of the Rogue Cast. This week’s offering was recorded on 24th January, 2025 and is a conversation with Dominic and Christian on their Sheep Farm Podcast.

All 3 of us are former pupils of the same High School and I last spoke with them in the Summer of 2024. This conversation was another enjoyable ramble across a variety of subjects pertaining to this crazy realm we find ourselves in.

Topics discussed include the staged geopolitical realm, its various actors, the News Benders film of 1968, the recent Fog, tobacco smoking, mind manipulation, the second summer of love, the lawfare waged upon Richard D Hall, the Law, Do Unto Others As You Would Have Them Do Unto You, a parasitic legal system, sovereignty, money and credit, empathy, male female polarities, the effects of testosterone replacement therapy, (ste)roid rage, genetic manipulation, how the societal pendulum will inevitably swing from left to right and the resultant changes, acadummy gatekeeping and hidden history.

Hope you enjoy it as much as I did. Thanks to Dom and Christian for having me on the show and, a big thank you to all those who have supported the work on this site. Please consider buying me a coffee should you be feeling appreciative.

RogueCast 071: Back On The Farm (Download – Right Click to Save Link As)

 

4

The Fog Descends

Just as the Isles of Britain were recently covered in fog, a fugue hangs over Nottingham University’s exhibition on the Caves of Nottingham.

For whatever reason, I have recently garnered a number of new subscribers to my Substack pages and I would like to begin by welcoming each and every one of them.

Regular readers and listeners may have noticed that I have not published anything for some 30+ days. This has been a consequence of my falling ill on Monday, 30th December. Whilst I do not know the exact cause, I strongly suspect it may have originated in the curious fogs which have recently been afflicting the lands of Britain (and elsewhere).

Around Yuletide, or the Winter Solstice of the year 2024, a series of unusual fogs were noted by various peoples around the world. The Isles of Britain were afflicted too and many reported feeling ill as a consequence of being out and about in them. Nottingham was no exception and, for several days, a dense fog lingered over the city.

 

Jason Breshears of Archaix commented:

“The fogs and mists that have been documented recently are probably not a government weapon to kill the people. That anyone would even announce this is evidence for it being a cover story, not the truth.

In fact, these sickness mists or plague fogs have been documented since the dawn of recorded history. William Corliss in his Sourcebook Project books and Charles Fort in his myriads of reports and books has documented many incidents of fogs and mists appearing unusual and then causing widespread sicknesses. This has been happening for a long time.

In 1930 thousands fell ill after strange fogs appeared in Belgium. In 1902, the last Phoenix year they are mentioned. Referenced also in this newspaper clip. Star jelly, carbonaceous materials like flakes falling from the sky- all documented. Fetid, putrid, sticking fogs and snowflake materials of hydrocarbons.

In 1347 strange objects in the sky over Europe were seen spraying mists later called plague fogs. The Great Black Death plague broke out.” Twitter post

William Bramley wrote of contemporaneous accounts of the Black Death/Plague being caused by strange fogs in The Gods of Eden, 1989.

Whatever the cause, it is true to state that I am rarely ill and that this affliction had me bed-ridden for 3 days, during which time I had what I would describe as a head cold, with a hacking cough (that lingered for over 2 weeks), the occasional nosebleed and headaches caused by my sinuses being blocked.

Looking down to the fog in Hathersage, 27th Dec, 2024

Interestingly, on Friday 27th December, 2024, I was out on a hike in the Peak District, above the town of Hathersage. Whilst the valleys were shrouded in fog, clear blue skies were dominant at the higher levels of what are called Stanage Edge and Burbage Rocks.

 

The megalithic stones of Stanage Edge – the forces of nature did not create these.

The official narrative would have us believe that these are merely “gritstone escarpments” but, on closer inspection, the notion that these were formed by natural forces of wind, rain, ice-sheets and erosion is palpably untrue.

 

 

Burbage Rocks – again, these were not formed via glacial deposit and the action of wind and rain. What we are looking at are the remains of a huge structure from the Old World.
Higger Tor – casually dismissed as an ‘Iron Age Fort’ by the keepers of the ‘knowledge’.

I am increasingly convinced that the Isles of Britain are covered in these megalithic structures that reveal an ancient and magnificent Old World civilisation on a such a huge scale that we can scarcely imagine it, let alone emulate its architectural splendours. It is self-evident that these structures were subject to enormous cataclysms that laid them to waste and buried huge swathes of ancient architecture that was so sophisticated and of such a size that builders of today would be utterly incapable of such advanced levels of construction.

The summit of Kinder Scout is littered with megalithic structures that many climb over but never question.

 

The city of Nottingham is but one example of how these former civilisations have been buried and exist, quite literally, beneath our feet.

Nottingham University’s ‘Tales from the Caves’ exhibition: a uniformitarian fairy tale.

By way of example, last Thursday, I visited an exhibition at Nottingham University on the proliferation of the caves that exist under the city. There were a number of documents, photographs and associated articles that are displayed in glass cabinets. The lighting is dim which renders them difficult to read. Significantly, the exhibition denies any and all members of the public the opportunity to film or take photographs of them on the false premise that the exhibits are either private or will be damaged by the act of taking a photograph, so I don’t have any illustrations to show.

Universities are in the business of spewing out false narratives, thereby hiding the Truth.

However, the role of the University is clearly that of a gatekeeper – a gatekeeper who takes the view that the ordinary man is morally and intellectually inferior to the burghers of truth. They have engaged a number of lecturers to deliver talks on the subject but these were sold out – a pity as I would have loved to have had the opportunity of asking some pertinent questions.

The University’s attitude is typical of such institutions and is in marked contrast to the museums, like the one at Nottingham Castle, where no such restrictions exist on photography.

Castle Rock, on top of which stands Nottingham’s Ducal Palace (it is not a castle). Acadummies regurgitate the narrative that the ‘caves’ were dug out by the city’s inhabitants from the ‘natural’ rock.

In any event, it matters not as the exhibition simply repeats the false uniformitarian notion that the caves were formed in some mythical time when all the land was under sea and that, centuries later, the caves were carved out by men equipped only with hammers and chisels and horses and carts for moving away the rubble.

Indeed, a little to the West of the Trent Building (a venue where, incidentally, I studied for a degree in English back in the 80s), there is a curious out-of-place-artifact (OOPART) which stands as testimony to the inherent nonsense of uniformitarianism, the false doctrine of how life was formed in this realm:

More acadummic nonsense; a plaque at Nottingham University promoting a fictitious narrative.

The Isles of Britain are full of such OOPARTS and remains, all of which point to the existence of an ancient civilisation that was blown apart and covered by a series of catastrophes that were documented and recorded by historians who had a firmer grasp on the real history than those highly-paid ‘professionals’ whose job it is to regurgitate the falsities with which they have been programmed.

One particular example is the remarkable tunnel that goes from the Park Estate to Derby Road – the official narrative would have us believe that this was constructed so the high and mighty could drive their horse and carriages from the Estate and into the city. It took a few years to construct and yet, when it was finished, the slope was too steep for the carriages to travel along.


If you visit the tunnel, you will see that the entire structure is built upon massive sandstone blocks that are clearly not a result of the compression of sedimentary rock but are engineered, possibly poured into situ by an ancient and advanced civilisation.

A tunnel that the false guardians and progenitors of our ‘history’ state was built at the same time as the city’s other old-world buildings that exist to this day. Those buildings were not built in the 19th century by highly skilled architects, masons, master-craftsmen who had no power tools and were wholly reliant on horses and carts to transport massive stones at a time when the population was very small and the roads were often muddy morasses.

The logistics of these bogus narratives are always the common point at which they fall down: the numbers of people, the technology available to them simply do not add up. In other words, many of Nottingham’s buildings are from an old-world civilisation that has been buried by cataclysm and built over.

This take on our world is one which few go near but, it has to be noted, more and more people are digging into it and making sense of it by systematically demolishing the AI narratives.

The fake archeology of Nottingham is echoed all round the towns and cities of the Isles of Britain as well as across the realm we call Earth.

The Isles of Britain are full of artefacts and remains that point to the existence of an ancient civilisation that was blown apart and covered by a series of catastrophes that were documented and recorded by historians of former epochs who had a firmer grasp on the real history than the current highly-paid ‘professionals’ whose job it is to regurgitate the falsities with which they have been programmed.

In this case, the fog is created by the deliberate falsehoods of the University Uniformitarians, aca-dummies, each and everyone of them, whose role it is to enshroud and obscure the incredible remains of the advanced civilisation that once existed across the lands of Britain.

Thank you for reading this essay. As ever, I am very grateful to those who have chucked a few quid into the coffers by way of the  Buy Me a Coffee button and/or have taken out a subscription to my Substack pages where, if you like, you can also support me by taking out a paid subscription which will grant you ‘first dibs’ on my output.

Further viewing –

Rather synchronistically, this presentation by Jason Breshears of Archaix illustrates perfectly that which I have attempted to convey. Highly recommended.

3

The Mortgage Monkey

The Great British Mortgage Swindle in Real Time.

This Rogue Cast (070) is a condensed exposition of the various components that comprise the multi-levelled racketeering operation which is revealed in the Great British Mortgage Swindle (TGBMS) the eviscerating documentary that was released in late 2018.

Whilst I have written extensively about TGBMS, this episode stands as a real-time expose of how the entire racket is predicated on the ignorance and common practice of the conveyancing solicitor.

The viewer is encouraged to read this essay on how, in 2015, I sued the conveyancing solicitor who advised me that the mortgage agreement I entered in 1994 was Lawful, along with this Rogue Cast, ‘the Knight Who Shut Down My Negligence Claim.’

Both illustrate exactly how and why the courts of the British Isles are engaged in covering up the swindle to the point of rolling out a Knight of the Realm to assist them in their manifest support of what is an industrial-scale racket.

For those who haven’t’ watched TGBMS, it can be viewed here for free.

The podcast stands as an exposition of how a current application for a loan to buy a house (secured by a mortgage) is unfolding and is laid out in in a step-by-step account of the role that is played by the conveyancing solicitor.

Regular readers will not be surprised by the various deceptions that take place during the process of the application and what is laid out is the demonstrable professional negligence of the solicitor who is, in effect, wholly reliant upon the common practice of those who specialise in these matters. The appeal to common practice is, of course, a logical fallacy on the simple basis that just because a practice is done commonly, that does not necessarily make it Lawful.

The entirety of the racket is predicated on the false notion that a loan is made. This essay explains exactly how and why it is false.

It is to be noted that all of this applies to each and every mortgage application, whether in the Isles of Britain or elsewhere in the world.

The swindle is wholly dependent upon the ignorance of the duped individual who, in reality, is the one who funds the purchase of the property in its entirety.

As stated previously, the licenced brokers (the ‘banks’) are in the business of wheeling and dealing in securities – they do not make loans but only extend credit and in this industrial scale fraud, the creditor (the mortgagor) is the one who provides the funding by way of his signature on a deed to a property he does not own at the time he signs the incomplete deed (it is not dated).

This is in contradiction of s1 of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1989.
The agreement for a loan for the disposition of an interest in land (which includes mortgages) is, as a matter of fact, illegal in every case as it is not in writing and is never counter-signed by a duly appointed officer of the fake lender, which is a breach of s2 of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1989 (the LPMP Act  1989).

The issue of a valid contract can be read in this essay,  TGBMS – No Contract?

In this current situation, which is developing right now in Nottingham, we can see how, like a conjuring trick, the deception is dependent upon the ignorance of both the ‘punter’ and his legal advisor.

Naturally, it is largely dependent also upon the false notion that a loan has been made from the fake lenders’ coffers when, in accord with the monetary mechanics of modern finance, the credit is created by deposit of the fake mortgage deed in an account from which it is streamed.

Agreement means contract and in this essay, I explain exactly how a valid contract requires the agreed terms, conditions and performance of both parties. At most, the lender should be paid an administrative fee only.

In this situation, at the behest of the conveyancing solicitor and because there is no performance (loan) made by the bank, then it is what is known as a nudum pactum, literally, a naked agreement.

As an interesting aside, the question may be reasonably asked, how is it that virtually no one who leaves the public fooling system understands what actually constitutes a valid contract?

 

 

 

 

A valid contract will contain the following elements:

  1. The agreement of the parties to perform in accordance with the terms and conditions – this can be oral, or in writing, as is required under s2. of the 1989 LPMP Act.
  2. Consideration by both parties (the duped individual is promising to pay via the credits he earns but the bank’s performance is an illusion – no loan is made).
  3. A written contract will contain the terms of the agreement and will be signed by the parties.
    In short: the fake lender is in breach of these stipulations. It is also worth noting that without full disclosure as to where the funds originate, then any agreement becomes null and void.

As the podcast shows, the former Nottingham Bank was located in the magnificent building on Thurland Street in Nottingham. Said building has two monkey statues fixed to the stone work: commonly recognised as a mortgage monkey.

The solicitor in each and every case is being paid for his professional knowledge and from this it naturally follows that he should know the Law of Mortgages.

However, he does not for he has been miseducated during the course of his years of study in the legal system, which is, in essence, a mirror of the Talmudic system which has formulated a series of complex ‘get out’ clauses to ‘permit’ any and all unlawful stratagems.

In 2014, the case of Scott vs Southern Pacific was ruled upon by the Supreme Court, with Justice Lady Hale issuing a (unheeded)  warning that there is no right to grant a charge unless you are the owner of the property –

Without exception, the conveyancing solicitor will instruct the client not to date the deed – in line with the bait and switch deception whereby the individual goes into the arrangement as the creditor and ends up as debtor.

All of which is predicated on the credit system which controlled by the financiers to their advantage and to the detriment of everyone else.

The 1989 Act makes it plain that there has to be a contract signed by all parties.

The questions which arise from this current real time expose of the duplicity of the conveyancing solicitor are straightforward:

  1. Is it lawful for me to sign a mortgage deed over a property which I do not own?
  2. Where is the contract as per the Act?
  3. Can you confirm that the ‘Bank’ will be making a loan of moneys from its own coffers?

The Kuwait Bank vs Sahib case, which was between 2 banks, not between a mortgagor and a bank made it plain  as long ago as 1996 –

UNITED BANK OF KUWAIT V SAHIB & OTHERS
(1996) Times, 13 February
Deposit of deeds does not create charge

COURT OF APPEAL
Published 13 February, 1996

Before Lord Justice Leggatt, Lord Justice Peter Gibson and Lord Justice Phillips

Judgment February 2, 1996

Section 2 of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989, which provided that a disposition of an interest in land had to be in writing in a document signed by both parties incorporating all the terms of the agreement, abolished the long established rule that a mere deposit of title deeds relating to a property by way of security created a valid equitable mortgage or charge of the property without more.

The Court of Appeal so held in a reserved judgment dismissing the appeal of the third defendant, Societe Generale Alsacienne de Banque SA (“SoGenAl”), from part of the judgment of Mr Justice Chadwick (The Times July 7, 1994; (1995) 2 WLR 94) in the Chancery Division when he granted a declaration that, as between SoGenAl and the plaintiff bank, United Bank of Kuwait plc, SoGenAl did not hold any equitable mortgage or charge over the undivided share belonging to the first defendant, Hadi Haji Sahib (“S”), in the proceeds of sale of the property known as 37c Fitzjohn’s Avenue, Hampstead, London… continued here

All of which may add up to the refrain,

One rule for thee but another for me.

and the selective application of the Law of Mortgages.

It is hard to escape the fact that the solicitor is acting simultaneously for the bank as well as the individual punter – is this ever disclosed? No. The conflict of interest is another element of TGBMS.

Is there any aspect of the transaction which is lawful?  I would argue not in the least.

To reiterate this essential point, these are the most salient questions an indivdual can ask of his conveyancing solicitor,

  1. Is it lawful for me to sign a mortgage deed over a property that I am not the owner of?
    Where is the agreement for the loan?
  2. Can you confirm that there does not need to be a written contract, signed by both parties as per the LPMP Act 1989?
  3. Can you confirm that I will be receiving the loan from the bank’s own funds?

Common practice is what they will rely upon but that does not make it lawful.

How competent, therefore, are these conveyancing solicitors?

Both the separate documents that the husband and wife are being asked to sign – one for him promising to continue working into his 70s and one for her to relinquish her spousal share of the equity in the house are manifestly void and fall as fatal breaches  of the Consumer Rights Act – as soon as an individual is disadvantaged, that’s a breach of the act.

At Law, the statutory regulations listed here and elsewhere have to followed by the licenced lenders but they are not. Why? Because it is a criminal racket.

In short, the conveyancing solicitors know nothing about the Law, let alone the statutory regulations they are legally required to comply with.


The notion that the LPMP Act does not apply to individuals is fallacious
There is no mortgage contract containing the signatures of both the mortgagor and the mortgagee, along with the terms and conditions, in a single document.

This offends Section 2 of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989, in accordance with the Court of Appeal decision in United Bank of Kuwait v Sahib & Others [1996] –

a mortgage or charge will not arise without a section 2 compliant contract.

This is the dilemma posed in the Rogue Cast – being furnished with the facts of the matter, what would you do?

Thank you for listening and reading the accompanying essay. As ever, I am very grateful to those who have chucked a few quid into the coffers by way of the  Buy Me a Coffee button and/or take out a subscription to my Substack pages where, if you like, you can also support me by taking out a paid subscription which will grant you ‘first dibs’ on my output.

All the very best, Michael.

1

A Question of Law: The Triads of Britain

HOW & WHY MAGNA CARTA WAS FOUNDED ON ANCIENT BRITISH HISTORY & LAW.

It is reasonable to state that the Peoples of these islands [commonly known as the ‘British Isles, including Ireland’] have a long and noble history of common law.

Natural law may be seen as the innate understanding of what is fair or right (correct). The common law rises from it.  Natural law, being of the creator/nature/god, is superior to any man-made law (positive law) which may be used to place a state, corporation or any individual between a Man and his maker.

From the common law, there arises knowledge of certain key principles like the right to a fair hearing, freedom of expression, due process of the law and the power of a jury to nullify an unjust law or exonerate an individual who has been wrongfully accused. It includes the reasonable principle that a crime cannot have been committed without there being a victim, or injured party.

“Blind unquestioning obedience is the law of tyrants and of slaves: it does not yet flourish on English soil… Arrested with or without a warrant, the subject is entitled to know why he is deprived of his freedom, if only in order that he may, without a moment’s delay, take such steps as will enable him to regain it.” Christie v. Leachinsky [1947] A.C 573.

From: “Freedom under the Law” by Sir Alfred Denning, One of the Lords Justices of his Majesty’s Court of Appeal in England’ 1949 (Thirteenth Impression, 1986)

Common sense is the innate understanding that rises in a man when he is faced with an issue or situation that and it is founded in intuitive reason. Common law, in so far as it depends on the ability to reason, is common sense.

NATURAL LAW > COMMON

For an overview of the distinctions between natural and common law, here is an interesting read:

In Western culture, the philosophical conception of natural law first appears among ancient Greek thinkers. Although natural law is often conflated with common law, the two are distinct.

Common law is not based on inherent rights, but is the legal tradition whereby certain rights or values are legally recognized by virtue of already having judicial recognition or articulation.

Natural law is often contrasted with the human-made laws (positive law) of a given political community, society, or state.

In legal theory, the interpretation of a human-made law requires some reference to natural law. On this understanding of natural law, natural law can be invoked to criticize judicial decisions about what the law says, but not to criticize the best interpretation of the law itself.

Some jurists and scholars use natural law synonymously with natural justice or natural right (Latin ius naturale), while others distinguish between natural law and natural right.”

“Cicero wrote in his De Legibus that both justice and law derive their origin from what nature has given to man, from what the human mind embraces, from the function of man, and from what serves to unite humanity.

For Cicero, natural law obliges us to contribute to the general good of the larger society.

The purpose of positive laws is to provide for “the safety of citizens, the preservation of states, and the tranquility and happiness of human life.”

In this view, “wicked and unjust statutes” are “anything but ‘laws,'” because “in the very definition of the term ‘law’ there inheres the idea and principle of choosing what is just and true.”

Law, for Cicero, “ought to be a reformer of vice and an incentive to virtue.” Cicero expressed the view that “the virtues which we ought to cultivate, always tend to our own happiness, and that the best means of promoting them consists in living with men in that perfect union and charity which are cemented by mutual benefits.”
SOURCE

 

The Isles of Britain: Ourstory

Our ancestral story goes back further than we have been led to believe – way past the principles of law as enshrined in the Great Charter, the Magna Carta of 1215 and to a time predating the arrival of the armies of Rome. For an eloquently straightforward overview of the evidence of the geometrical, architectural and cultural sophistication of our ancestors, the reader is invited to watch the following film by Tom Brooks:

To return to 1215, the most often-referenced parts of the Great Charter are,

+ (39) No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgment of his equals or by the law of the land.

(40) To no one will we sell, to no one deny or delay right or justice.”

Screen Shot 2016-04-21 at 13.13.04

A free man is simply one who is not a slave. In other words, he is a man who is not a citizen; one who has revoked his consent to be governed by authorities which common sense shows him to be tyrannical and oppressive.

We live in times of great deception, where pollutants bombard our earth and our biology from every source (land, sea, air, water and sky/ether); a world in which fake religions like that of Money/Banking, the State-corporate and organisations such as Judaism, Catholicism, Christianity, Islam et al seek to control our minds and hearts. Whether by ill-intended design or not, the effects are the same.

We also live in an era when the Law is being applied selectively by corrupt judges, barristers and solicitors, when corporations have the same rights as persons, Judges ignore the evidence and when certain individuals falsely believe they are above the law.

It logically follows that those who have no knowledge of these matters are those most vulnerable to the sophistry of those who prey on them by way of deception. For instance, until one knows how little power a bailiff has, then one will be thrown into a state of emotional imbalance (fear) which makes one easy to manipulate and vulnerable to attack from those who seek to psychologically, financially or spiritually dominate one.

This, of course, is what lies behind the fake paperwork and oppressive conduct of those who act as ‘debt collectors’. An individual will be similarly fraught with anxiety if he knows not how MON-EY is created. In the sense that huge swathes of people have no idea whence it comes from, what it means and hold the view that it is all-powerful, then they have fallen for a religion for they place blind faith in its ‘magical’ powers. To understand how it is created and controlled to the advantage of an elite is to break its hold over the psyche.

Quite how and why certain individuals and state-corporations seek to achieve such control is for the individual to investigate – the information is out there and people may choose to not use their common sense. They can live in willful ignorance or not.

Screen Shot 2016-04-21 at 13.16.44

What is the truth?

The truth is that which can be evidenced. It does not rely on emotion. The enemies of truth – and there are many – seek to dominate our emotions in order to make feelings reason subordinate to emotion, the result of which is a populace that is easier to control.

Should one doubt that, then ask the question,

Why would a creator give us the ability to reason, if he wanted us to have a blind unquestioning faith in what we’re told, without ever thinking for ourselves based on scientific proof ?”

Who benefits from nihilism?

nihilism |ˈnīəˌlizəmˈnēəˌlizəm|
noun
the rejection of all religious and moral principles, often in the belief that life is meaningless.
• Philosophy extreme skepticism maintaining that nothing in the world has a real existence.
historical the doctrine of an extreme Russian revolutionary party c.1900, which found nothing to approve of in the established social order.

ORIGIN
early 19th cent.: from Latin nihil ‘nothing’ + -ism.

Modern nihilism, whereby the origins of life and life itself are taken to be meaningless and without reason, having begun by way of some mythical ‘big bang’ only leaves us swimming and drowning in a sea of lies. One would do well to ask cui bono (‘who benefits’?) from this state of affairs when millions of people believe that life is meaningless?

To reiterate: historical truth goes by evidence not emotion. Some may say that Magna Carta was based on those principles of law as established by the English king known as Alfred (the Great). Yet what of the more ancients kings of these lands, the ones who were here long before the Saxons and others who invaded these shores? What of those indigenous Britons whose ancestral lineage extends back over 4,000 years into antiquity?

The lies of history have sought to bury that knowledge in favour of those who have usurped these lands for their own material benefit, of which William the Bastard, who invaded in 1066, is a prime example.

Freedom from tyranny

And yet that which is true cannot be buried – or at least not indefinitely. Which is why it is crucial to uncover the hidden history of the indigenous people’s of these islands known as Great Britain.

“tyranny |ˈtirənē|
noun (pl. tyrannies)
cruel and oppressive government or rule: people who survive war and escape tyranny | the removal of the regime may be the end of a tyranny.
• a nation under cruel and oppressive government.
• cruel, unreasonable, or arbitrary use of power or control: she resented his rages and his tyranny | figurative : the tyranny of the nine-to-five day | his father’s tyrannies.
• (especially in ancient Greece) rule by one who has absolute power without legal right.”

When a man finds himself subject to tyranny, it is by way of his common sense and the process of natural law that bring him to rebel and to stand his ground on that which he knows to be true. The tyranny is too much for him to tolerate – he knows it is better to die on one’s feet than on one’s knees.

Such was the state of affairs that led to the sealing of the Magna Carta by the despotic King John at Runnymede in 1215.

A man is a divine body of spirit and matter, as rooted to the earth as he is connected to the heavens in the firmament above, his potential is only limited by his imagination and his connectedness to the great soul from whence he came.

The unearthing of the truth by way of his common sense can effect his escape from the tyranny he perceives. By releasing the mental shackles, he steps into the power of his divinity.

The world of MATTER is inseparable from that of the spirit. Born of mater (mother), one has materialised on these lands in order to play an active role in the world and if tyranny stands in one’s way, then so be it: it must and will be vanquished.

The ancient laws of Britain were laid down by Dyfnal Moel Myd (Dyvnwal Moelmud) and they arise from Natural Law. It is self-evident that they pre-date any of the masses of fake statutory/legal systems of control as traitorously put in place by the psychotic controllers.

The law and society as they stood in ancient Britain during the centuries preceding the Roman invasion of 55 BC. It is based upon the surviving laws of king Dyfnal Moel Myd (Dunvallo Molmutius), who reigned in the 5th-4th centuries BC. The account, from pp. 20-24 of Flinders Petrie’s paper, bears repeated reading, for it reveals a level of culture and literacy amongst the early Britons that is quite unlike the popular image that has been cultivated in recent years by the modernist treatment of British history. It also speaks volumes for the existence of a king whom modernists have always said was a mythical figure, and it reveals our ancestors to have been a highly cultivated and civilised people, and not the illiterate painted savages of popular fame.”

“The condition of pagan Britain is remarkably preserved in the laws of Dyvnal Moelmud. That these laws are certainly long before the tenth century is proved by the gulf that exists between the state of society shown by them and that of the laws of Howel fixed to AD 914.

The laws of Howel show a highly complex and detailed condition of law, and an elaborate royal court, with the rights of officials minutely fixed. In the laws of Moelmud there is very simple law, always subject to proved custom and to adaptation to circumstance; there is no royal court, and very few officials, with no defined claims.

Moreover, the laws of Howel refer back to Moelmud. What takes the laws of Moelmud at least to Roman times is that they are purely Pagan, and the only Christian allusion is an addition to the forms of legal oath, saying that ‘In subsequent times the form of oath was given by the Ten Commandments, the Gospel of St. John, and the blessed Cross’ (no. 219). T

his stamps the previous oaths and the rest of the laws as of the pagan period, and therefore at least of the third century, as British bishops attended the Council of Aries in AD 314. How much farther back these laws may date, towards the traditional time of Moelmud, the fourth or seventh century BC, we cannot now enquire.”
SOURCE

Screen Shot 2016-04-15 at 12.43.48

The laws as codified by Moelmud were based on the ancient rights, usages and customs of the people.

Those principles exemplified in Magna Carta were therefore inspired by and founded in more ancient traditions.

These central tenets of law therefore go back thousands of years.

These laws give a remarkable view of a community with the greatest respect for weakness and misfortune, high rights for women, full consideration for foreigners, and great privilege for learning, for the arts, and the crafts. Social duty was strongly held, and the full power rested on the vote of every free man and woman, even to deposing the king. Arms were prohibited civil assembly, and the harp was as necessary to a free man his coat and his cooking-pot. The whole air is that of simple conditions and a free life, with much personal cultivation and sympathy in general conduct. It would be impossible to produce such a code from a savage or violent people, and this intimate view of their life is the best ground for judging of their qualities. That there was generally a well-organized peace kept in the country is shown by Caesar’s statement that ‘the number of the people is countless, and their buildings exceedingly numerous.”

SOURCE

The Welsh triads

Screen Shot 2016-04-21 at 13.21.42

The Molmutine Laws are given in the form of triads – a poetic form which comes in ‘threes’, an aspect of oral bardic tradition whereby information was more easily memorised:

1. There are three tests of civil liberty: equality of rights, equality of taxation, freedom to come and go.

2. Three things are indispensable to a true union of nations: sameness of laws, rights, and language.

3. There are three things free to all Britons: the forest, the unworked mine, the right of hunting.

4. There are three property birthrights of every Briton: five British acres of land for a home, the right of suffrage in the enacting of the laws, the male at twenty-one, the female on her marriage.

5. There are three things which every Briton may legally be compelled to attend: the worship of God, military service, the courts of law.

6. There are three things free to every man, Briton or foreigner, the refusal of which no law will justify: water from spring, river, or well; firing from a decayed tree; a block of stone not in use.

7. There are three classes which are exempt from bearing arms: bards, judges, graduates in law or religion. These represent God and His peace, and no weapon must ever be found in their hands.

8. There are three persons who have a right of public maintenance: the old, the babe, the foreigner who can not speak the British tongue.

9. There are three things free to a country and its borders: the roads, the rivers, and the places of worship. These are under the protection of God and His peace.”

SOURCE

 

It is those long-established principles which formed the bedrock of the demands made by the Barons to King John in 1215 and which were subsequently used to form the constitution of the United States:

For more than six hundred years– that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215–there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or resisting the execution of, such law.”

–Lysander Spooner, The Right of Juries

They will never be lost as they exist as imprints within the very dna of all free-thinking and righteous peoples across the planet.

Contrary to the deceptions at the heart of nihilism, we are each born free and exist under God only. No man, potentate or de facto agency of the state-corporate can come between the man who knows who he truly is and acknowledges the Golden Rule:

Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.”

That is the legacy of Dyfnal Moel Myd (Dunvallo Molmutius) and the ancient ancestors of the peoples of Britain and that is why a system of control that seeks to bury the principles of justice and divinity by way of ‘Civil Law’ and nihilism is doomed to failure.

Tyranny will fail as it is a closed system that none will thrive under. Freedom will always reign supreme and it is gaining in popular awareness. It is there to be claimed and exemplified by the independent man, not granted by pope, prelate or fake potentate.

Was man created to live in a closed system?

It is a given that freedom is an idea and a natural way of being that can never be vanquished. It is for this reason that the laws of ancient times, the Magna Carta, the common law, the constitution of the united states and all systems of justice that are predicated on them and common sense are as valid now as they have ever been. Their validity is based on them existing as eternal truth and not simply upon some dusty document that the people were not party to.

It may be stated that they are of incalculable value in these times given the demonstrable tyranny of the state-corporate whose modus operandi is more control and less freedom.

All men thrive in an open system of mutually respected freedom – one is free to do as one chooses, providing no harm is caused to his fellow beings.

The Great Charter of 1215 embodied the spirit of that time and it also carried within it the principles behind the more ancient laws of these lands. Those principles hold good today as they are founded in the truth.

RM posits that a Great Charter for the present (2016) has already been created and exists as the treaty of Universal Community Trust, a voluntary association of self-governed individuals, forming anarcho-nations under natural law

Anyone to whom these words and principles resonate in their hearts and minds, is hereby invited to drop their citizenship and declare their individual sovereignty and, under voluntary association with like-minded souls, form his own anarcho-nation, wherever he so be, each living under natural law, in accord with the terms of the treaty. A pdf of such a declaration is attached below along with a Sovereign Declaration by which the individual may relinquish his citizenship.

Blessed be the righteous.

Screen Shot 2016-04-21 at 13.28.36

FOUNDING DEED ANARCHONATION TRUSTEES

INDIVIDUAL SOVEREIGN DECLARATION

As always, a huge thank you to all those readers and listeners who have shown their generous appreciation for my discourses and essays. Should you be able, please chuck a few quid in the pot via the Buy Me a Coffee button and/or take out a subscription to my Substack pages. if you like, you can also support me by taking out a paid subscription which will grant you ‘first dibs’ on my output.
All the very best, Michael.

4

Episode 68: The Glass Menagerie

The Alternative Media Menagerie

The danger of throwing pebbles in a glass house is a suitable metaphor for those fringe magnets who inhabit the snow dome that is the alternative media.

Menagerie noun
a collection of wild animals kept in captivity for exhibition.
a strange or diverse collection of people or things: some other specimen in the television menagerie.
ORIGIN
late 17th century: from French ménagerie, from ménage (see ménage).

Fringe magnets is a term invented by Dom Waterson of the Sheep Farm website and podcast and it means those popular public figures who fret about on the ‘alternative’ stage set of the ‘truth-seekers’. Unfortunately, the stage is populated by a menagerie of statists who are masquerading as free-thinkers.

The Curious Tale of Miri Finch

The menagerie is, of course a reference to the factual existence of financier-state sponsorship of those limited hangouts and agent provocateurs which and who exist in order to corral people into echo chambers where the truth and the facts are sidelined and the participants are led in a circular dance that never goes anywhere and never offers remedies, with the overall effect being to splinter the opposition and to sow doubt in the minds of the public. All of which is its purpose.

In the 1968 film, The News Benders the main character states that 92% of the population have no idea that the news is composed of fake events and falsities of all descriptions. The rest, he says, “work for us”.

The state asset, Marianna Spring is an example of a woman who, though she operates in the lame-stream sewers of the BBC Propaganda Pumping Station, throws around a heap of pebbles as she fact-checks the output of those that the military-industrial complex label conspiracy theorists. The hopeless irony being that she works within an organisation whose modus operandi is the production and dissemination of false narratives, inaccurate information, woke nonsense as well the employment of a plethora of nonces whose slimy trails score across the entire dung-heap of its fetid output.

Never, ever, does she fact check the disinformation that the corporation was created to spew into the minds of the unthinking masses and which it does on a daily basis. I would love to see her critique The News Benders as it is, perhaps a classic example of revelation of the method.

I have previously posited that James Delingpole is one of these types in so far as he has been set up precisely to engage in this type of operation. James loves the shekel, that is true, but is it unreasonable to suggest that he deliberately steers clear of discussing, in any real depth, the nature of the financial fraud and false money system we are having to negotiate as we journey through this shit parade of lies?

Miri Finch is a woman who writes articles on a variety of ‘conspiracy’ issues and she has a sizeable following on Substack. I previously critiqued her article in which claimed Richard D Hall is a deep-state asset and that the Manchester Arena False Flag of 2017 was part of an elaborate, even ingenious plan to curtail freedom of speech. My conclusion was that her writing is largely fallacious and full of airy nothings or empty rhetoric.

Her reliance on empty rhetoric was also clearly demonstrated on a recent podcast with Iain Davis in which she attempted to explain how and why she sees Hall as a state asset – this is from the opening segment to the podcast and is a direct quote of her explanation,

“there are people who believe, as is their right, that the bombing was real and that the victims were injured in that bomb in the way that they said they were and that’s those peoples’ beliefs and if these people have really been injured in the way that they say they have and you’re accusing them of faking, isn’t that completely unacceptable?

No, it’s not unacceptable at all, it’s totally acceptable and not just acceptable but the basis of the judicial system which assumes everyone is innocent until proven guilty. So, whenever you make an accusation of anyone, always the initial assumption is well they are innocent until there’s enough evidence to show either way. So, I said, yes of course, we must accuse potentially innocent people because how do we otherwise get to the truth. We don’t know what the truth is, that’s why (intelligible) … we’re making accusations, so, we’ll just have to go where the evidence takes us.

Erm, now, with, erm, particular people, Martin and Eve Hibbert, … I do think they are victims of something, I just don’t think it’s a bomb, erm, so if we just shut down the conversation, completely and say they’re victims, they’re disabled, they’re vulnerable so they’re beyond reproach, can’t ask any questions of them, then we’re never going to unravel what’s really going on. So, you know, whatever’s really happened to them, we have to risk making false accusations, have to risk being wrong, maybe, you know, apologise for being wrong, but that’s the only way to get to the truth.”

“I think they set up the counter narrative via Richard D Hall. The big red flag to me is the amount of media publicity he gets and it’s not just since [the trial]”

Now, Miri’s schtick and oft-repeated adage is, “if you know the name, they’re in the game.”

By which she means that anyone whose name appears in the media is a player in the mind-control and psy-ops which are perpetrated against the public.

Unfortunately, it is a rather simplistic and very fragile tag-line upon which to hang an ethos or any kind of logic or reasoning.

She states that Richard D Hall is in the ‘game’ because he has been referenced in the lamestream media over the Manchester Arena false flag and what his book revealed, then he must be an actor, whose modus operandi is all scripted and that he must be a security services asset. By that ‘reasoning’, the harassment he received at his market stall in Merthyr Tydfil by Mariana Spring and the subsequent BBC Panorama hit piece on him were all an act, created for the express purpose of demonising ‘conspiracy theorists’ and creating judicial precedents that all serve to curtail freedom of expression.

She is, if I have understood it correctly, claiming that the real controllers are always behind the scenes, anonymously directing the actors who take on the roles assigned to them in the geo-political realm. In this sense, she opines that Hall is a state asset or useful idiot.

If we follow this line of reasoning, then the Crown House of Rothschild is but a front-operation, even though it is a name that is not widely recognised. There is an element of truth in this as the World Crime Syndicate website substantiates.

For the purposes of this essay, let’s take it on face value and state that Miri is correct: that we only know or recognise the names of those who are deeply embedded in the never-ending game of hide and seek and that it is the unnamed controllers who hide in the shadows that are the real initiators of the oh-so-cunning movements of the chess pieces around the geo-political stage.

Now, let’s apply her adage to Mir-i-am herself.

She has stated on the Sheep Farm podcast that her father was employed at Keele University and that that is where she was brought up. But who is her father? How many of us have heard of him?

His name John Sloboda and he is a recipient of the Order of the British Empire and, thus, firmly one of the elite.

His OBE was ‘awarded’ for his service – a service into the uses of music in the realm of psychology, of its use as a tool of mind control.

This is what his Wikipedia entry states about him,

Is it not interesting to note that  Sloboda was the Executive Director of the Oxford Research Group, of which it is stated,

“The Remote Warfare Programme was established in January 2018, based around the Remote Control project of the Network for Social Change, which had been hosted by ORG since 2013.

It analyses shifts in military engagements, focusing on Western states’ increasing focus on working through local and regional partner militaries in places such as the Middle East and Africa.

As part of this, they examine current developments in military technology and doctrine such as cyber-warfare, unmanned weapons systems (such as unmanned aerial vehicles), private military and security contractors, and special operations forces.” source

Note the link with the Network for Social Change and its involvement in

“cyber-warfare, private military and security contractors and special operations forces”

is it not the case that each and every cited example of these limited hangouts is engaging, perhaps not directly, but substantially in each of these areas?

Are any of these players to be trusted?

Does this mean Miriam’s father, John Sloboda, is in the game, as she likes to put it? Maybe. In any event, he is a bona fide member of the establishment on the simple basis he has been awarded an OBE for his service(s). I am also reminded at this point of another accurate and comical expression used by Dom of Sheep Farm, in reference to the family lineage of those who ponce about in various state-sponsored roles and whose families are firmly ‘established’ to the point where there is never any ordinary line of work to which they are associated,

No Plumbers Allowed

Incidentally, and for those who may be curious, neither Dom and Christian or myself are from establishment families; a suggestion which makes me chuckle as I write it and which is easily dispelled by the fact their father was a butcher and small-holder and mine was an engineer, both heralding from Huddersfield, where, interestingly, Miri Finch now resides.

The use of popular music as a mind control technique is well-documented and one only needs to listen to researchers like Mike Williams and read the work of Dave McGowan and Mark Devlin to see how sophisticated this Tavistock-based deployment of music as a psychological tool has been, with the Beatles being perhaps the finest example of its success.

There are numerous links to Sloboda’s work and whilst I have no interest in researching his academic papers, others may be inclined to do so.

If we are to apply Miri’s tenet then does it not follow that – because I have never previously heard of her father, who is a recipient of an OBE and other establishment accolades – that he may well be one of the psychological influencers/manipulators who exist in the shadows and control those ‘names’ she states being in the game?

And what of Miriam herself?

The link to Companies House suggests that she is also a player in the game. Quite how and why she has 3 separate (now dissolved) companies of which she was director is equally suggestive that she too is a player in the “game”.

It is interesting to note that in March, 2021 she joined a “consultant team” at a legal firm as “as a Legal Assistant (Non-Solicitor).”

“The Jonathan Lea Network is now a full service firm of solicitors that employs senior and junior solicitors, trainee solicitors, paralegals and administration staff who all work from a modern open plan office in Haywards Heath. This close-knit retained team is enhanced by a trusted network of specialist consultant solicitors who work remotely and, where relevant, combine seamlessly with the central team.” Source

Gven the fact that no paralegal (like Miri), solicitor, lawyer, attorney or member of the judiciary in the captured UK plc knows anything about the Law, it should come as no surprise that her ‘opinions’ on matters of Law are woolly and inaccurate as can be demonstrated by the above quotation from Iain Davis’ interview with her.

Acrylic Dressed Up as Wool.

Much of what she asserts is as woolly as her beanie (which is most likely acrylic),

“as a non-lawyer there can sometimes be limits to what I can achieve. However, now with the leverage of an established law firm I can work with, my contributions should have considerably more impact, and I’m very excited indeed about what the Jonathan Lea Network and I can achieve together.”

Empty rhetoric, which upon close inspection, amounts to the square root of fook all.

In any event, one does not take up a paid position at a legal firm without satisfying the employment criteria – they would not appoint her if there was any controversy or doubt about her being a loose cannon. She is evidently regarded as a ‘safe pair of hands’, as demonstrated by the firm’s endorsement of her and her appearances on Delingpole’s and Davis’ podcasts, as well as that of the other disinformation pedlar, Aisling (Whatshername).

Davis has appeared on these platforms and even interviewed Miri on his podcast. Why bother with either bint is my question – what purpose can be served by engaging with these women? Why not have me on to discuss the reasons why Judge Steyn’s order is lawfully VOID and what that actually means? Why piss about with a pair of lasses who are manifestly puffed up on their own empty rhetoric?

It is also worth considering what the game is that Iain Davis is playing. For instance, let us take the adage that signs and symbols rule the realm.

Davis’ logo is a strange one: the smiley face and this is very telling.

The inventor of the smiley face logo has made great financial gains from its prevalence.

Its usage began in the 1950s and was dominant in both the controlled hippy movement of the 1960s and the replay that was the acid house of the late 1980s.

There is also William Ramsay’s work on the phenomenon of the Smiley Face Killers.

Notice the blood through the eye – why would Davis choose it as his logo, given the negative associations it has with music and as a symbol for mind control?

The blood smear reminds me of the staged ‘assassination’ attempt on Trump, in which he rises up from behind the podium with a smear across his cheek. The fact that it was, going by the recurring shoe-motif, a freemasonic ritual of some nature may suggest that Davis’ intention behind choosing that particular symbol is also freemasonic in origin.

Delingpole also professes a fondness for the smiley face,

“he spent some time wearing smiley T-shirts and taking Ecstasy. “I think my Ecstasy chapter is one of the best bits of the book,” he says. He’s right. It’s lovingly nostalgic about the club scene during the late 1980s, as well as a savage indictment of it. He tells us about the “warm, beatific smiles” and the “beautiful faces radiating happiness” on the dance floor, as well as the “poo-scented tailwind of the swing doors” in the dreadful lavatories, and the terrible malaise when the drugs wear off.”  source

I would also add that Davis has establishment connections too – Delingpole, UK (MI5) Column, and, “Iain’s work is regularly featured by a number of outlets including The OffGuardian, Lew Rockwell, Technocracy News & Trends and The Corbett Report.”

Each of which, I would posit, are establishment-controlled ‘alternative’ limited hangouts.

Whilst I may be wrong in regard to some of these assertions, I can reassure readers that I am not of their ilk. As stated, my dad was, for forty years, an engineer at David Brown Gears in Lockwood, Huddersfield and neither my paternal line (family name, Kaye) or my maternal line (family name, Thompson) contain any establishment lineage.

Thus, it can be safely said that I am not chucking stones around in a glass menagerie.

On the subject of establishment families, Delingpole was educated at the exclusive and expensive Malvern College and Oxford University and had a career in the mainstream media. His cosiness with Miriam, his glaring omissions on the fake financial system and his blatant connectedness with the establishment all point to him being an establishment-sanctioned ring-master in the interminable realm of the limited hangouts. After all, if we know the name, are they not in the game? And, does that not account for their large audiences?

This may well go some way to explaining how and why he jumped to the defence of Miriam after he had initially shared my article exposing her fallacies and empty rhetoric.

Remember too that each of these referenced commentators have thousands of followers on social media, that they have only recently come to the fore and that, by comparison, I have very few. To be elevated so quickly to such levels of attention is suspicious as we are in an electronic panopticon in which those who are genuine are not permitted to have large followings; their work is suppressed via censorship, the statistics are manipulated – the game is rigged and only the state-sanctioned players are ‘allowed’ audience access of the size these individuals have.

Whilst I get no pleasure of any kind as I write this and would prefer not to examine the grubby antics of these types, it is important to air these matters on the simple basis that the deceptions and frauds of these individuals need exposing.

As one commentator put it, it can be safely stated that I am not on Miriam’s Christmas card list. It is also fair to state that I will not be receiving an invitation to be a guest on the Delingpod.

As always, a huge thank you to Dave, Steve and David R for their generous appreciation of my discourses and essays. Should you be able, please chuck a few quid in the pot via the Buy Me a Coffee button and/or take out a subscription to my Substack pages. if you like, you can also support me by taking out a paid subscription which will grant you ‘first dibs’ on my output.
All the very best, Michael.

0

Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Baskerville 2 by Anders Noren.

Up ↑