Sovereign Being Under Natural Law. Educator. Anarchist. Occasional podcaster. Co-producer & protagonist in the film, The Great British Mortgage Swindle. Founding Trustee of Universal Community Trust. Lives in Bernicia & Deira, one of the Stolen Ancestral Lands of Northern Britain.
A Discourse On the Stripes That Mark Out the Criminals at Play On the World’s Geopolitical Chessboard, Including an Inappropriate Pair of Trainers, a Railway ‘Line’, a Strange Striped Badge from 13th Century England and a Frantic Judicial Attempt to Cover Up A Mortgage Forgery.
Notes:
Keir Starmer’s vacuity, his Adidas Trainers, the Cocaine Train scandal, his cover ups for the elites.
His Treason as evidenced by his WEF role, his governmental plundering and funnelling of moneys to foreign interests and to the detriment of the peoples of the Isles of Britain.
How Starmer may well be up to his balls in a clandestine relationship and his conflicts of interest.
He is also fond of ‘hanging out’ with the notorious cokeheads, Macron and Zelensky.
Effete men like Starmer and his two mates may well enjoy its effects.
The origins of the expression 4X2 as rhyming slang for ‘Jew’.
Where is the MSM coverage of the coke train scandal? Silence. A far cry from the halcyon days of tabloid outrage when a story of this magnitude broke.
More censorship from X
Starmer as a Tragic Anti-Hero – up to his neck in covering up the crimes of his elite handlers, a man who fell in love with the gross materiality of the world.
The empty shallowness of cocaine and how it amplifies individual vacuity, fuelling delusions of adequacy and grandeur.
Dave’s matter with the Nationwide BS who have made a fraudulent claim for possession of his home.
The barrister, Mr Laville (above), rather than explaining how the document came to be forged, turned up to the hearing but offered nothing, relying instead on repeating the mantra that Dave’s application was an ‘abuse of process’ when that is exactly what he is engaging in – a conclusion that is reached on the basis that he chose to remain silent about his reliance upon it in order to make material gain for his masters and his client, the Nationwide BS.
How Judge Pickering fallaciously dismissed Dave’s application on the false ground that he could only inspect and consider evidence in the court file, even when Dave has demonstrated in his Affidavit and in court to the judge himself that it contains a forgery.
The liars, perverts and subverters of the Truth and accuse others of that which they are engaging in themselves.
How to account for the conduct of Judge Pickering.
How, in matters such as this, Dave is the only one in the court who is standing under the facts of the matter in the unlawful possession claim against his home.
_____________________________________
As ever, thank you for your attention. If you are feeling appreciative, please chuck a few quid into the pot via the BuyMeACoffee button and/or take out a paid subscription at my Substack page.
In this RogueCast, I discourse over the subject of Anarchy, the inherent criminality of the State, the Troubled Life of Keir Stalin and ask the question, is the West heading towards Civil War?
Correction: it was recorded on Easter Sunday, 20th April, 2025.
Anarchy defined:
1530s, “absence of government,” from French anarchie or directly from Medieval Latin anarchia, from Greek anarkhia “lack of a leader, the state of people without a government” (in Athens, used of the Year of Thirty Tyrants, 404 B.C., when there was no archon), abstract noun from anarkhos “rulerless,” from an- “without” (see an- (1)) + arkhos “leader” (see archon).
Voluntary Association – truth in contracts, no third party interloper, no deceptive dealings with each other, no fraud, only a Lawful agreement between the parties.
The genocide of Government – whether it be at home or abroad – your Government wants you dead.
Coercion is the modus operandi of Government.
Moneys plundered under threat of violence, then used to fund programmes at home (Divoc 91, for instance) and abroad (the genocide in Gaza is being funded by taxpayers) and, for all its DOGE moves towards dismantling the USAID funnelling of plunder towards ‘woke’ initiatives which the majority of the populace do not support.I also consider the allegations that Keir Stalin is in a homosexual relationship with the Mohammedan Lord Ali
Is ‘Kweer’ Starmer in a lavender marriage? In a wider sense, it could be reasonably asserted that the Labour Party is also in bed with the Mohammedans?
I consider further the long-held Lawful position that the claimant who was owed money had to provide the instrument of indebtedness, without which his claim would be dismissed. All of which is a far cry from the current state of the Legal system whereby HM’s courts will accept a dog-eared photocopy and falsely claim that proves the indebtedness.
How Religionists are essentially Statists by another name – after all, both believe in that which cannot be proven and certain groups are given privileged status. How can Starmer survive when his claim(s) to be a fit and proper PM have been demonstrably shown to be a pack of lies?
It is beyond doubt that Western countries are fractured by way of the incessant and ever-increasing plunder and the granting of special rights, privileges and immunities to certain groups, largely of an ethnic hue to the detriment of the Native Peoples.
In the light of which, the question arises – given the circumstances, are we heading towards civil war? The quoted article suggests that all the conditions are “nearing the ideal”, making it inevitable.
Perhaps it is already here, possibly in the form of an information war, a battle between the Truth and Lies?
Which side, ultimately, do you take in such circumstances – Anarchy or Statism?
The Financial Plundering by the Financiers & HM Gov Is Mind-Boggling. Moaning is Rife. As a National Strike Looms, I Examine How a 1930s Couple Threatened the Beast With A Nationwide Mortgage Strike.
THE REDOUBTABLE ELSY BORDERS VS THE BRADFORD BUILDING SOCIETY.
Can pay, won’t pay
So it was for Elsy Borders, the housewife who became a folk hero in the organisation of mortgage strikes in the 1930s.
This is an inspirational tale of two mortgagors, Jim and Elsy Borders, who achieved national acclaim and the support of hundreds of thousands of mortgagors who, inspired by their actions, went on Mortgage Strikes vs the Building Societies in Britain in the 1930s to the outbreak of WW2 over the banksters/building societies’ fraudulent misrepresentations.
The history of the Borders and their battle vs the Bradford Equitable Building Society may well be an example to all those currently engaged in the struggle to end the treachery of the biggest pyramid scheme of them all, namely the securitised loan scam aka The Great British Mortgage Swindle. It is quite possibly an example which can be used to inspire the brow-beaten ‘mortgagors’ of these shores to draw that line in the sand and declare they too are on a mortgage strike.
It is also significant in the part it plays in establishing the cause of action for the Tort of Deceit:
It is today taught in legal training that it was held in Bradford v Borders (1941) that the maker of a false statement must have intended for the claimant to have relied upon the statement if a tort is to be established. Moreover, the main difference between suing in deceit and in negligence was addressed by reference to the caps on remoteness of damages. In deceit, to mark the law’s disapproval of fraud, the defendant (in Elsy’s case the building society) is liable for all losses flowing directly from the tort, whether they were foreseeable or not.
The Fraud on the Court Claim as exemplified here is founded on this very principle – namely, the unscrupulous lawyers, who make fraudulent possession claims on behalf of the ‘front’ banks when the mortgages over the properties/lands in question have been sold on. These fake banks, like the Bradford and Bingley, for instance, are not the holder-in-due course of the mortgage and thus have no right to initiate such claims.
Now, given the deliberate deceits of the banksters and their well-paid lawyers who lie to court and claim their ‘clients’ (who are not in actuality the holders in due course of the mortgage notes, but rather the collectors of moneys for the investors in the mortgage backed securities) it would appear that we may well have grounds for a similar uprising of the people vs the banks… Read this and smile, folks … it is genuinely inspiring and should help all to see just how powerful we are …
“ELSY AND JIM BORDERS ”
“[…] Born around 1900, Elsy Florence Eva was the London housewife who changed the course of legal and political history in the field of owner-occupied housing mortgages. The campaigns around rent control and investment in council housing that the Communist Party was noted for in the 1930s were extended by the Borders to home-owners who went on mortgage strike in protest at shoddy workmanship in the building of new homes.
INDOMITABLE: ELSY BORDERS SPEAKING TO STRIKING MORTGAGORS.
A Communist Party member, Elsy played a prominent role in all this by taking her building society to court over its failure to ensure good building standards. Many homeowners were deeply concerned over the complicity of the building societies in accepting the low standards of construction from speculative builders and the campaign was successful in contributing to legislative change.
Unlike in the USA, which relied on major state infrastructure projects to get out of the Depression, the 1930’s building boom – along with the rise of new consumer industries – were the initial factors in shifting Britain’s sluggish economy upwards (until rearmament came along). But not all of the new buildings were well-built. Many of the new homes leaked, creaked, and crumbled. Building societies tended to be highly authoritarian towards borrowers and could even be considered beset with corruption and snobbery. A situation tantamount to renting emerged as societies employed weekly collectors of the mortgage to try to prevent mass mortgage default as more and more fairly ordinary working class people with secure jobs turned to mortgage-holding.
In March 1934, Elsy and husband Jim, a London cabby, bought a house on Coney Hall estate, twelve miles from Charing Cross in West Wickham, today firmly in the London Borough of Bromley but then thought of as being beyond and into the green belt of Kent. They moved in with their three-year-old daughter, Pamela, and, having a keen sense of humour, named their home “Insanity”. So, their address became, “Borders of Insanity”, Coney Hall Estate, West Wickham, Kent!! More formally and much later it was to become 81, Kingsway, Coney Hall, West Wickham, Kent.
The Borders purchased the house, which was built by Messrs E. Morrell, through the Bradford Third Equitable Building Society. As a down payment, they paid £37 in cash – a considerable sum – and signed a mortgage for the remaining £693. The building society, in accordance with their usual practice, paid only £650 to the builders, keeping the rest as part of a pool to pay losses from defaulted mortgages.
Hardly were the Borders installed when they noticed cracks in the ceiling, squeaks in the floors. Soon plaster began to fall, dampness oozed through the walls, the roof sagged and leaked. Later, it was stated in court by Jim Borders that “…the house was in a bad condition. The whole front … was damp, and the wallpaper fell off the walls by its own weight. The foundations were narrow and did not look strong enough to support the house. There were cracks in the outer walls and windows in front did not fit. Two of the windows would not shut and had been in that state for at least two years. The ceilings were cracked and the roof leaked. The electric wiring was never safe, and the front of the house was cracked in several places and the eaves were open. The glass on the front door has collapsed, the bath had dropped from its original place, and the fireplace had come away from the walls. The chimneys were defective and the woodwork was infected by a small insect. The party wall did not go up to the full height, and he had shaken hands over it with his next door neighbour. That was all he could think of for the moment, he added.”
While the Borders grumblingly met their monthly four guineas payments, Elsy busied herself helping form first a local and then a national Federation of Tenants’ and Residents’ Association. Some 1,200 residents organised themselves into the Coney Hall District Residents Association and, as a result of the struggle, Elsy Borders later became a leading figure in the FTRA, along with Michael Shapiro (se separate entry) as Secretary.
When, in a blaze of local publicity during 1937, the Borders began withholding mortgage payments until some remedy was provided about the building flaws, this prompted as many as five hundred of her neighbours on the estate to also intentionally defaulting on their payments to building societies. After three months, the Bradford Society brought a claim against Jim and Elsy, seeking repossession of the house on the simple grounds that the Borders were three months in arrears with their mortgage repayments.
In turn, the Borders hit back with a massive compensation claim of £500 to cover the accumulated costs of repairs already effected by the couple over the previous three years, a sum approaching the cost of the whole house. Their claim charged misrepresentation of the value of the house, questioned the legality of holding back part of the cost in a pool, while at the same time charging interest on the full amount, and charged the society that it had lent money on an insufficient security and had “wilfully and fraudulently” misled the couple into believing that the house was built of good materials and in efficient manner.
Unable to afford a lawyer, Elsy Borders spent several months reading law in the London School of Economics, and handled the case herself, winning national fame in the mainstream press as “the housewife Portia – the tenants’ KC”. [KC=King’s Counsel] The case began on 13 January 1938 and focused the attention of the whole nation upon the plight in which hundreds of thousands of house purchasers had found themselves.
[…] For 18 days at the beginning of 1938, the legal battle was fought out in the Chancery Court, which was permanently packed with crowds who came to see the “Portia, the tenants’ KC” in action. Elsy spoke for a stunning eight hours but, despite a great deal of fuss that made it seem as if they had achieved total victory, in fact, the Borders actually won only a part of their case, in so far as the Court’s judgment dismissing both actions gave them clear title to their house, without having to pay any more instalments, but rejected other claims.
The Bradford Building Society’s case failed, Mr Justice Bennett ruled, because it was unable to prove that the mortgage deed it produced as evidence was the one that the Borders had actually signed. But the Borders’ counter-claim failed too, because Elsy couldn’t prove that the building society was responsible for misrepresentation. […]
As many as 70,000 families were on rent or mortgage strike at one point.
In 1939, on the centenary of the great working class Chartist Convention that demanded reforms such as universal suffrage and annual Parliaments, representatives of the 200,000 members of the booming Federation of Tenants’ and Residents’ Associations met for its first national convention.
[…] This was all a big deal; Britain had some one thousand building societies, with assets totalling £750,000,000. But the judgement had left all the major issues unresolved, whereupon in February 1939 some 3,000 owner occupiers in outer London went on mortgage strike, causing many houses to be repaired. A measure was rushed through Parliament to legalise the established practice of the building societies in respect of this collateral. Also, whilst it is true that the Borders’ ultimately lost their specific case, the endeavour did truly expose abuses of the building society system and was one of the factors leading to its regulation by an amendment in 1939 to the 1874 Building Societies Act. […]
The “Tenants’ KC” was to return to court in March 1939 with a libel suit taken out by her husband Jim against the builders of the Coney Hall estate, Morrell Brothers, for describing him to his building society as “definitely a bad egg”.
Elsy’s opponent in this was Norman Birkett KC, no mean opponent in the least. At this point in time, pince-nezzed Birkett was mostly known as the man who got Wallis Warfield Simpson her divorce so that she could marry Edward VIII but he was also considered as Britain’s top criminal lawyer. Described as “one of the most prominent barristers of the first half of the 20th century”, and “the Lord Chancellor that never was”, he was later to become Baron Birkett, a Court of Appeal judge and a member of the House of Lords. Birkett was noted for his skill as a speaker, which helped him defend clients with almost watertight cases against them. Birkett’s legal opinion helped shape the final judgment at Nuremberg Trial of the Nazi leaders in 1945.
Yet Birkett found himself more than matched for guile by Elsy, who won the case hands down, with the court awarding Jim Borders £150! Said Elsy, as Norman Birkett KC withdrew from an attempt to cut and thrust which was well parried by her: “I wiped the floor with him! He was bloody wild.” Elsy was described by one newspaper as “a brilliant and resourceful leader. She has insight, a cool head and, above all, a fervour which inspires her colleagues.” Birkett’s opening observation on cross-examining Elsy was that she was “getting quite accustomed to litigation”. This drew a lightning response from her, widely and approvingly quoted in the newspapers: “This is the first time that I have had the pleasure of meeting you, Mr Birkett”, as laughter drowned the court.
Birkett sought to suggest to Jim Borders that he had only been put up to take the case to court by his domineering wife. “I put it to you,” he declared, “that Mr and Mrs Borders are one and the same person and that person is Mrs Borders.” In response, as Jim’s counsel, Elsy retorted: “There may not be any difference between Mr and Mrs Birkett but there is a difference between Mr and Mrs Borders.” Birkett’s wife was widely portrayed by high society gossip columnists as a domineering woman, so even the judge burst out laughing and the court dissolved into momentary anarchy.
The Borders’ crusade against the power of the building societies was only finally extinguished as the phony war was began to turn to blitz. The case was dragged to the House of Lords in 1940 by Bradford Third Equitable. There, the following year when judgement was handed down, predictably, the honour of building societies was redeemed and Bradford totally exonerated. The mortgage strikes promptly fizzled out. Nonetheless, this had been a moment of serious challenge to the conception of the property-owning democracy that was at the heart of Tory and Liberal thinking on housing – mass mortgage ownership would only be kick-started again in the late 1950s and early 1960s.
Even though the legal outcome as regards collateral security, responsibility for the condition of mortgaged property, and for builders’ descriptions of new houses favoured building societies, remedies had to be found.
In the short term, the campaign – and the associated struggles of rental tenants – shook the very foundations of the political and economic basis of housing policy in Britain. As Claud Cockburn (see separate entry) later wrote (at the time, he was still writing for the Daily Worker as Frank Pitcairn):
“The whole freewheeling apparatus of the boom, the ramshackle financial machine which powered the productivity and profit of it, appeared to be in danger.”
Sadly, the Borders lost possession of their home through these crafty legal moves by the building society. In late 1940, as the blitz progressed, Elsy evacuated with daughter Pamela to Exeter, where she died in 1971. Her marriage to Jim ultimately failed, and neither ever owned a house again. Jim trained as a barrister, but died almost penniless in 1966.
Elsy’s lasting legacy in the world of law is to be the by-word for what constitutes a fraud. In the case of Bradford Third Equitable Benefit Building Society v. Borders [1941], Viscount Maugham’s explanations of his view of what establishes the tort, or civil wrong, of deceit or fraud were not only accepted by the court, they have been used as precedent in countless cases from that time to this very day to establish liability or not.
Arguably, had Elsy not been previously so eloquent, the Viscount may not have been wheeled out by Bradford’s solicitors to issue his fine definition of fraud. Of course, the ultimate in judge-made law is the House of Lords and it was its judgement in 1941 that provides this `legacy’ of Elsy’s.
SNAPPY JUDGES – TAKE OFF THE WIGS, LADS OR DO THE RIGHT THING BY THE PEOPLE. THE GAME IS UP.
It is today taught in legal training that it was held in Bradford v Borders (1941) that the maker of a false statement must have intended for the claimant to have relied upon the statement if a tort is to be established. Moreover, the main difference between suing in deceit and in negligence was addressed by reference to the caps on remoteness of damages. In deceit, to mark the law’s disapproval of fraud, the defendant (in Elsy’s case the building society) is liable for all losses flowing directly from the tort, whether they were foreseeable or not.
But, Maugham’s definition also establishes that a common law action of deceit requires a representation of fact (her expectation that the home she was paying a mortgage on was sound) made by words, or conduct – but not silence or omission – made with a knowledge that it is wilfully false and with the intention that it should be acted upon so as to result in damage sustained by acting on a false statement. In other words, that it was necessary all along in English law to prove that Bradford Third knew that they were funding an unsound home. Effectively, the Borders’ claim that Bradford had “wilfully and fraudulently misled” them, was ruled by the House of Lords as something that could virtually never be established in the business of mortgage lending.
Elsy did not ultimately fail in her campaign, as some have suggested, but the British establishment simply changed the rules to favour themselves. Even so, the business of selling homes that enabled the appearance of damp on walls and ceilings, cracked masonry, warped window- and door-frames, leaking roofs, beetles in the woodwork, and the shrinking floorboards, which issued electric shocks from defective wiring could never again happen.
Sources: Time Magazine July 31st 1939; `Where the Other Half Lives: lower income housing in a neo-liberal world’ Edited by Sarah Glynn, Pluto Press; Thanks to Michael Walker for references from the Communist Party pamphlet `Battle for Homes’ by Ted Bramley; Daily Telegraph, 25th July 2001; Bradford Third Equitable Benefit Building Society v Borders [1941], English Law Reports 205, 211A; The Times March 20th 1939.”
“As many as 70,000 families were on rent or mortgage strike at one point.”
which is a sizeable number.
Today (2025) there are over 11.5 million void mortgages under the auspices of the Crown (via its velvet gloved partners in crime known as Her Majesty’s Land Registry).
The further we take it into the same’s Courts of Injustice, the more the system relies on its high placed masters of double-speak and lies, the Rabbinical high priests who preside in the theatres of tyranny to deny the ‘Goyim’ their equitable and lawful remedies.
A Rigged Game
In the whole of 2009, there was not a single victory for a mortgagor who took on his bogus lender in the courts and yours truly was just one of those. Since then, nothing has changed. The court is the ultimate casino-house-of-religion and the fact that the banksters have their inside agent placed in the fictitious house of parliament in the shape of the ‘Remembrancer‘
THE REMEMBRANCER.
The role of the Remembrancer should demonstrate to all those with a capacity for clear thinking just who and what is the real power at work …
Couple all this with the distinct possibility the Bank of England is the ultimate holder of all those securitised mortgage notes and we are left with the conclusion that we are living under a tyranny. A tyranny of control that will never provide the people with what is lawfully theirs ~ in the simplest of terms, all loan agreements without the signatures of all parties are void.
The courts and judges know this, the people know and the Banksters are acutely aware of this fact too. All mortgages are therefore unlawful. What could be simpler? And yet, the attention spans of the population at large seem too short to hold this thought and the fear that’s been implanted in them often wins out in the form of inaction…
The system comes down heavy on those who challenge it and resorts to force in the last resort. The people, dumbed down through vaccinations, legal drugs, de-education programming (school), chemical assaults on the brain through the air, food and water and afraid to take what they regard as a ‘risk’ with the roof over their heads, shrug their shoulders and drag themselves out to ‘earn’ more of the elusive credit points to pay off a loan that does not exist…
I have been challenging the Banksters over #TGBMS for sixteen years now. In that time, one had expected more and more people to come on board to the point where millions would be challenging the banksters and refusing to pay them moneys that cannot and will never be verified. He had, naively, expected a moment to arrive when the numbers swelled to such an extent that the system could not enforce its bogus orders and, as has happened, bailiffs would fuck off and take the bovine police with them. Without the duped police, this game would have been over long ago… The armed forces and police are referred to as “Our dogs” by the hidden Luciferian sorcerers, the controllers for whom they willingly commit crimes against the people the ruling classes are so afraid of.
Ultimately, the power lies with the people.
But how do we effect a change in the way the Borders did? A mortgage strike of 70,000 mortgagors refusing to pay the banksters would be as massive now as it was then. Such a volume of individuals would, by starving the beast of its funds, be able to bring the whole house of cards down and, being blocked up with the administration of such a sizeable resistance, the criminal injustice system would fall too.
Elsy Border went out and spoke to crowds of people at public events ~ word spread by way of mouth and people got organised ~ is it not the case that now with the internet we have a greater capacity to reach more people? Would that work now, with speakers and meetings organised in communities around the country? Is it now the time to begin such a campaign?
It has long been established that a man’s home is his castle (Semayne Case) and that no man has the right to enter it without his expressed permission.
What would be the outcome if people started – en masse, in their thousands – to withhold their monthly payments, even if only for two months at a time? How would the courts deal with such a scenario whereby they were flooded with such huge numbers of fraudulent possession claims?
Do we not have the power, individually and together to affect such a change whereby the people take back full ownership of their land and homes for the benefit of all, not the least the future generations who, as things currently stand, face lifetimes of indentured servitude just to keep a roof over their heads?
Of course we do.
As ever, thank you, dear reader, for your attention. If you are feeling appreciative, please chuck a few quid into the pot via the BuyMeACoffee button and/or taking out a paid subscription at my Substack page.
The facts are beyond dispute: Taxes that go towards funding a criminal government are unlawful under Common and International Law.
Today’s discourse and the accompanying notes are of especial pertinence to British and American people but also for those in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and South Africa.
Irrespective of what the fraudulent captured governments may falsely claim, you are under Common Law.
When ‘your government’ is stealing your moneys via taxation and using them to fund a Christo-Zionist Genocide (think, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Palestine) then you are obliged under moral and international law to cease funding it. In other words, you have a moral duty and the right to stop paying taxes that the IRS, His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC) et al can (and will) not challenge.
It also applies to the funding of so-called Regime Change and the plethora of non and governmental agencies that have initiated a series of ‘influential’ operations like the fake plandemic, the imposition of a deadly serum delivered at mass-needlepoint, gender-awareness, EV promotion, ‘democracy’ influence on and over foreign states, geo-engineering, 5G, smart meters and all manner of diktats, moneys funnelled into ‘woke’ scams that, ulitmately, enable the crypto-controllers to cull the herd and make massive profits in the process.
The quotation below is from Ken O’Keefe and it was published in 2016 as a Legal Opinion for his then attempt to establish his World Citizen Mission. It was written by Dr. Curtis Doebbler
Summary of Opinion
“Questions of the legitimacy of State action, however, arise when a State uses its resources for activities that are inconsistent with its international obligations.
In such cases, individuals who are able to articulate their opposition to State policies because they are inconsistent with international law, including international human rights law, have a right and an obligation to refuse to act in a manner that supports such illegal activities.
Such action is not inconsistent with an individual’s duties towards his or her State because that duty also requires individuals to not support violations of international law.
1 Does international law recognise any human rights that can justify an individual’s failure to pay public revenue charges or taxes?
2 The answer to the first question is that international human rights law can be a justification for an individual’s failure to pay public revenue charges or taxes when it can be proven that the payment of taxes contribute to an illegal action.
3 Do individuals have a right or an obligation not to support violations of international law by their State?
4 The answer to the second question is that individuals have a right and an obligation not to support violations of international law by any State.
5 Do national courts have a duty to recognise individual rights that are part of international law applying to a particular State?
6 The answer to the third question is that national courts have a duty to recognise individual rights that are part of international law applicable to a particular State. This is the case because under international law, national law can never be a justification for a violation of international law.
7 What legal recourse does an individual have if his or her State forces him or her to contribute to taxes that are used to finance an action that violates international law?
8 Finally, the legal recourse an individual has if a State forces him or her to contribute to taxes that are used to finance an action that violates international law will depend, at the international level on the procedures to which a particular State has agreed. International human rights mechanisms may be approached to determine a States responsibility for forcing an individual under its jurisdiction to contribute to a violation of international law.
Inflation – pint of beer. Packet of Polo Mints now costs £1.20 30 years ago, the same packet of mints would cost just 35p.
State Inversion of the Truth – the targeting of young white males – feminisation, feminism, education, mind control – aim to portray them as the enemy.
Woke nonsense – the Last Voyage of the Demeter is a ‘woke’ film that purportedly is set in the late 1800s yet contains a series of woeful historical inaccuracies.
How I was, in my younger days, an ‘anti-racist’ – how prejudice may simply be discernment, the ability to think critically.
The self-evident attempt to replace the native populations is a decade’s old operation that is crystalised in the Kalergi Plan
The weaponisation of language – the empty rhetoric of the term Islamophobia demonstrates it to be a nonsense.
In other news, there are claims that Elon Musk’s social media platform X is to be fined $1 billion by the criminal mafia that is the EU. However, does the EU actually have the jurisdiction to fine X?
Under Common Law, fines, forfeits and punishments that have not been ordered by a Court of Law (which is a court of record) are illegal and void.
Like any and all relgions, Islam is a bind for the mind.
Religion defined:
popular etymology among the later ancients (Servius, Lactantius, Augustine) and the interpretation of many modern writers connects it with religare “to bind fast” (see rely), via the notion of “place an obligation on,” or “bond between humans and gods.”
The UK government may attempt to invert the language as much as its mealy-mouthed speakers of legalese can manage but it matters not if we stick to the true and accurate definition of the term. If Islam means surrender/submssion and phobia means extreme fear or dislike, then does it not follow that Islamophobia actually means,
An extreme fear of surrender?
As ever, thank you for reading and listening. If you are feeling appreciative, please chuck a few quid into the pot via the BuyMeACoffee button and/or taking out a paid subscription at my Substack page.
A Discourse That Begins With The Intelligence Of Dr Jekyll, Covers The 125 Year Sci-Fi-Psy-Op and Applies The Trivium To The Notion Of Space Travel as Perpetuated by NASA and Mr Musk’s Space X.
In some, if not all, respects, we are players in a great game of Hide and Seek. Last Spring, I released a Rogue Cast in which I posited the view that, whatever this realm may be, we are each of us involved in a game of hiding and finding. Each of us has things we wish to hide, or to keep secret from others. Each of us has a curiosity that sends us seeking answers to questions that have occurred to us.
“If he be Mr. Hyde” he had thought, “I shall be Mr. Seek.”
Stevenson puts forward the view that each of us exists with the capacity for good and evil,
“With every day, and from both sides of my intelligence, the moral and the intellectual, I thus drew steadily nearer to the truth, by whose partial discovery I have been doomed to such a dreadful shipwreck: that man is not truly one, but truly two.”
Stevenson writes of a duality of nature that is to be found in each of us,
“All human beings, as we meet them, are commingled out of good and evil: and Edward Hyde, alone, in the ranks of mankind, was pure evil” ?
What does our intelligence make of this?
Firstly, let’s consider just what intelligence means,
intelligence(n.)
late 14c., “the highest faculty of the mind*, capacity for comprehending general truths;” c. 1400,
“faculty of understanding, comprehension,” from Old French intelligence (12c.) and directly from Latin intelligentia, intellegentia “understanding, knowledge, power of discerning; art, skill, taste,”
from intelligentem (nominative intelligens) “discerning, appreciative,” present participle of intelligere “to understand, comprehend, come to know.”
This is from assimilated form of inter “between” (see inter-) + legere “choose, pick out, read,” from PIE root *leg- (1) “to collect, gather,” with derivatives meaning “to speak (to ‘pick out words’).”
* mind, as I have previously articulated, is non-local.
Given the non-locality of the mind, then intelligence may be defined as the ability to discern truths from the information (Grammar) received by the brain from the Informed Field.
Intelligence is the ‘capacity’ to comprehend ‘general truths’.
The character of Dr Jekyll is personified thus,
“from both sides of my intelligence, the moral and the intellectual, I thus drew steadily nearer to the truth.”
Stevenson is evidently suggesting that intelligence is dualistic – i.e it is only founded in the morality and the intellectual capacity of the individual.
Whilst I acknowledge this is but a work of fiction and that for the purposes of the narrative of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde, this is necessary, I do wonder if this precludes the other possibilities of intelligence being intuitive. After all, how often do we find that our first impressions of an individual or a subject turn out to be accurate?
At this point, it may be necessary to remind the reader that I am of the view that what we take to be our thoughts do not emanate from the brain but, rather exist outside us and that our brain is simply download the information.
The conscious individual comes to know that nothing comes from his brain, but that the brain receives his ideas and imaginings from the Informed Field, and that his connection to that is improved by his being conscious of himself as a spirit, sojourneying through this realm inside a bio-avatar that may not even be his.
Stevenson suggests that Jekyll is limited by his individual intelligence and that this may be applied to each and everyone of us;
“All human beings, as we meet them, are commingled out of good and evil: and Edward Hyde, alone, in the ranks of mankind, was pure evil.”
And yet, Stevenson also wrote in Lay Morals that,
“So long as we love we serve; so long as we are loved by others, I would almost say that we are indispensable; and no man is useless while he has a friend.”
And, in Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde, he shows himself to be well-aware of man’s true nature and his existence in this realm, a construct that is most likely a simulacrum, a copy of another realm,
“I began to perceive more deeply than it has ever yet been stated, the trembling immateriality, the mist-like transience, of this seemingly so solid body in which we walk attired.”
It is also to be noted that Stevenson was unhealthy, much of his life being plagued by an illness that, eventually, resulted in him moving to the South Pacific (Samoa) to alleviate its symptoms. Bouts of ill-health are certainly conducive to a more lucid view of individual existence as a beguiling and convincing dream in which we believe ourselves to be awake.
Largely bedridden, Stevenson described himself as living
“like a weevil in a biscuit.”
Our intelligence is necessarily limited until we apply our common sense to an issue.
Remember, in a mental construct or perceived reality, it is essential that we develop and apply our critical thinking skills to any given matter. If we are confined by an intelligence that only perceives a dichotomy, then we will become just that – an individual who is hampered by the limitations of his intelligence.
All of which is why the Trivium is such a powerful tool for it is one which utilises the individual’s natural proclivity towards elucidating the truth of a matter.
By way of example, let us apply it to consider Elon Musk’s promotion of his Space X narrative and his notion that we can travel through space and colonise Mars within 20-30 years.
Grammar: the who, what, when and where of the matter.
In order to truly believe in Space existing as a reality, it is necessary to examine the information:
Who has put forward the view that space travel is a possibility?
H. G. Wells – the War of the Worlds, the Time Machine; myriad Sci-Films and books of the last 100 years+.
Spielberg, Stanley Kubrick, Gene Roddenberry (Star Trek), George Lucas (Star Wars), the BBC (Dr Who), any and all Sci-Films and, of course, NASA.
The astronauts – each of whom is a freemason – are also presented to the public as proof space travel is possible.
When did the promotion of Sci-Fi begin?
Over 100 years ago, with H.G. Wells figuring large in its infancy. Since then, it has been rolled out via mass printing of newspapers and books but, arguably more significantly, it has been seeded in the imaginations of the populace by films and TV programmes that portray the fantasy and trick the viewer into accepting it all as possible. The sheer number of Sci-Fi films is taken as evidence of this being a mass thought control programme.
What are they each promoting?
The notion that the stars and planets are real and that we are on a globe (a ball) spinning through the galaxy at great speed.
What do they cite as proof of space travel?
The Cosmonauts of the Soviet Union’s voyages in space with Yuri Gagarin, huge volumes of ‘photographs’, videos of ‘astronauts’ in zero ‘gravity’, footage of space rockets and their purported landings.
To where do the believers claim man has travelled in Space?
The Apollo Moon Landing of 1969 and each of the subsequent ‘missions’ are invariably cited as proof that mankind has landed on the moon. However, a cursory look at the cited ‘proof’ reveals it to be nothing more than cinematic psy-op filmed, most probably, by Stanley Kubrick. The Newsbenders, a BBC film from 1968, reveals such a film set, a year before the ‘landing’ on the lunar surface.
Just one year before the Apollo ‘moonlanding’ of 1969, the BBC’s Newsbenders showed this lunar space set.
In 2025, we have the continuance of the same fake narrative in the form of Elon Musk’s Space X agency and his claim that mankind will be able to colonise Mars in 20-30 years.
We are also fed the fantasy of The International Space Station, nonsensical footage of Astro-Women with their hair on end to simulate ‘zero gravity’.
NASA publishes only composite images of the ‘globe’, CGIs of the world in which the clouds never shift, dubious photographs of the stars and the planets.
Computer/CGI composite ‘photos’ of the earth from ‘Space’.
How can the Critical Thinker ignore these anomalies (which are but the tip of the fraudulent and monolithic iceberg)?
By way of an adjunct, in July, 1969, I was 4 1/2 years old. It was an exceptionally sunny day and, with the lounge facing south, the curtains were drawn so that I could see the screen. I remember watching the purported moon landing as it was shown on our black and white TV. Whether or not I was viewing the highlights, I cannot recall. However, I was most definitely unimpressed by it, to the point where I decided it was not worthy of my attention any longer. After all, I would rather be playing outside, so I drew back the curtains, turned off the set and stepped out into the beauty of the day.
Such was my childish take on the Space nonsense. It may not surprise the reader but thereafter, I never had any real or lasting interest in the subject. We went to see the Star Wars film on its release in 1978 but I didn’t bother with any of the subsequent episodes.
2. Logic (reasoning)
How has the Sci-Fi Psy-op been promulgated? By the Dark Cinematic Arts of Film and TV, a programming of a false narrative that begins in the child and bombards him throughout his life.
Why? To keep Mankind distracted and thus ignorant of his true self and the nature of the world in which he appears to live. To sever the divine connection of each spirit to his ultimate creator. To disable and nullify the individual threat to the Freemasonic sorcerers and controllers that would arise were the individual able to break free of the mental shackles that tie him to the dungeon programming (Jason Breshears).
3. Rhetoric.
By way of the falsified Space Narrative, by the seeding and promulgation of the false notion that life is meaningless as we are but carbon based lifeforms spinning on a ball through a galaxy and the relentless propaganda attached to it all, the controllers or mind benders are able to place individual minds into virtual prisons where the walls that contain his mind are invisible.
The Space Narrative has served its scriptwriters and their controllers by effectively placing an imaginary astronaut’s helmet on the head(s) of the deceived. Not only is it a kind of goldfish bowl for his mind but it also works as a shaken snow dome, the particles of which further confuse and obscure his already limited perception of himself and his existence.
Conclusion: in a perceived reality, all is mind. Thus, those who seek to control the profane, the goyim and the infidel, the epithets that the masses are labelled with, use the Space Narrative as an effective means of mind control. Another significant benefit for the would-be controllers is the huge financial opportunities that also accrue via the funnelling of taxes and moneys into NASA and Space X.
Should you be able to support me, please consider chucking a few quid into the pot via the BuyMeACoffee button and/or taking out a paid subscription at my Substack page.
Nice is an incorrectly and much over-used word, at least as far as the English language is concerned.
I have been writing essays for close on 50 years, a discipline that was instilled into me throughout my state-education. From O-level, to A-level to a Degree in English Language and Literature, I became accustomed to being able to pump out 1,000 – 3,000 word essays at a fair rate by my late teens.
For me, the necessary discipline required for writing essays came naturally. Often, I would read back and ponder where the writing had actually come. Frequently, I was impressed by the quality of my writings, not in an egotistical sense but in a genuine sense that I would wonder where the inspiration and the actual content had come from. Invariably, I was left with the vague impression that it had come from a higher source, that I was tapping into some kind of information field and then I would conclude that what was written by the pen to manifest on the paper was some kind of ability that existed within me. In any event, it is fair to state that the act of writing has come easy to me but is it really to be attributed to that fictional entity known as ‘myself’?
I now no longer take the view that it was and is a local ability that resides in my brain.
In my previous RogueCast of last week, I delved into the non-locality of the imagination, how our dream-scapes are evidence of the spirit leaving the body during sleep, how this demonstrates that we are not the bio-meat-suits in which we travel through this realm and that our ideas and knowledge are direct reflections of our ability to tap into the information field that exists all around us.
In today’s episode of the Rogue Cast, I focus on the usage and correct meaning of the too-often spoken word, nice:
ORIGIN
Middle English (in the sense ‘stupid’): from Old French, from Latin nescius ‘ignorant’, from nescire ‘not know’.
nice(adj.)
late 13c., “foolish, ignorant, frivolous, senseless,” from Old French nice (12c.)
“careless, clumsy; weak; poor, needy; simple, stupid, silly, foolish,” from Latin nescius “ignorant, unaware,” literally “not-knowing,” from ne- “not” (from PIE root *ne- “not”) + stem of scire “to know” (see science).
As I uncovered the etymology of nice, I came across another word whose meaning is equally far-removed from its original and true sense:
fond (adj.)
late 14c., “deranged, insane;” also “foolish, silly, unwise,” from fonned, past-participle adjective from obsolete verb fon, fonne (Middle English fonnen) “be foolish, be simple,” from Middle English fonne “a fool, stupid person” (early 14c.), which is of uncertain origin but perhaps from Scandinavian. Related: Fonder; fondest.
We can see that the original meaning of nice derives from the Latin, nescius – meaning ignorant:
Those who carry out the business of the bankers are handsomely rewarded for their sweat equity ~ economists, propagandists, advertisers, film makers, psychiatrists, drug manufacturers (whether legal or otherwise, it matters not, if they are all using the money).
The thing is that in order to keep the people tricked and playing the game, the Bankers require that the people remain nescient (unaware) of what is going on. To break free of their mind games, one has to understand just what those games are and how they work on the human mind. From ‘Rescinding the Birth Certificate’
A current example of the correct use of the word nescient would be to state,
“Without a nescient population, which had been deliberately miseducated and propagandised, the genocide by needlepoint global operation would have failed.” Genocide by Needlepoint
Notes
Thank you and much appreciation to each and every one of you who kindly tipped me a few quid via the BuyMeACoffee page.
How over-used and inaccurately applied is the word nice.
The Trivium is the Three Ways of how we discern the Truth – Grammar, Logic and Rhetoric.
In a perceived reality we are compelled to the Truth that it is, therefore, a mental construct.
The brain is not the source of your imagination, your ideas, visions, realisations – it all comes from without you; the brain being but a receiver and an antenna of information. Information that is in the informed field that you appear to live in (although you may actually be dreaming yourself to be awake).
In a perceived reality logic and reason are essential tools in the individual’s armoury. The Trivium is the tool he can use to reach a more accurate and complete understanding of any subject.
The simulacrum we are in is, by definition, a copy of another realm.
A pertinent question in the butcher’s shop, comedy as release of unspoken subjects and thoughts, often in form of taboos.
The role of the Licenced Jester or Fool – why the comic has always been tolerated. A good comedian is simply tapping into the informed field to pull out the taboos that others may feel they cannot express.
The Fake Space Narrative and Elon Musk’s promotion of it and its furtherance.
His promotion of the fake space narrative and rockets to Mars leads us to the pertinent question of what his aim may be:
Elon Musk promotes the false narrative of Space Travel even going as far to suggest Mars can be colonised in 30 years.
Does he know that NASA and the Sci-Fi narratives of space travel are BS?
In the event Musk is serious and truly believes his own rhetoric, then he has fallen for the 100 year+ Sci Fi Psy-op.
If so, he’s fantastic actor who is simply continuing the furtherance of the baloney, for and on behalf of his Freemasonic Financial Overlords.
In the event he believes in it all, then he is a dupe, a fool or, to use the term correctly, a nice man.
So, given the word nice means ignorant or foolish,
is Elon Musk a nice man?
Conclusion.
The Power of Language is not to be underestimated. Use the words correctly, be precise in your expression of the Truth and avoid the use of the word nice unless you choose to use it correctly.
Indeed, your Critical Thinking abilities and intution are what will enable you to discern Fact from Fiction.
Thank you for listening.
Should you be able to support me during this time of my debanking, please consider chucking a few quid into the pot via the BuyMeACoffee button and/or taking out a paid subscription at my Substack page.
The word ‘Education’ is from the Latin, Educare, the definition of which is,
ORIGIN
late Middle English: from Latin educat- ‘led out’, from the verb educare, related to educere ‘lead out’ (see educe).
Notes
How the Truth has become an Inversion.
Appointment of Sir Hamid Patel as Chairman of OFSTED – Star Academies
Divide and Rule – Mohammedism is a Trojan Horse designed to perpetuate it.
Inversion of public servant – master roles when it comes to those in government
Lindsey Hoyle has grown fat on the public purse.
The best way to control the opposition is to lead it.
Reform party. Nigel Farage is an ex banker.
Chair of Reform Party is Zia Usuf – another Mohammedan
The placement of former bankers in geopolitical roles – Mark Carney, former Governor of BoE, now unelected PM of Canada
Quote from Phenomenal World, p 46
“Consciousness is not located in the brain, but is a ‘plasmic holographic energy field’ that permeates and surrounds the physical body. Is this hologram built of thought waves or thought particles? In a holographic universe the concept of location is an illusion, everything being nonlocal, including consciousness. Although consciousness seems to be localised somewhere inside the skull, it can at times appear to be localised elsewhere, as in the case of out-of-body experiences. The nonlocal aspect of consciousness is also suggested by dreams, where location and space are completely illusory and shifting.”
We are not our biological meat suits, our avatars, these vehicles in which we travel through this construct.
You become that which you suppose yourself to be –
“I am that, I am.”
The most powerful among us are the autodidacts, the free thinkers who have removed the mind shackles of their miseducation and the propaganda that they are immersed in.
Freedom of speech but not freedom of reach – Yaccarino, CEO, X.
How paying for X’s blue tick is like a man who is already in a straitjacket paying to be put in a muffled and silent padded cell (above)
Musk as DOGE, the Sheriff of Venice
The entire episode is, essentially, focused on the subject of Education and it is only by bringing out his spirit from within that the individual will free himself of the shackles of his perceived reality.
Thank you for listening.
Should you be able to support me during this time of my debanking, please consider chucking a few quid into the pot via the BuyMeACoffee button and/or taking out a paid subscription at my Substack page.
In this Discourse, the Rogue Male Considers How Association Football Shot itself in both feet and how Staged Events Like Football Are to Be Expected in a Theatrical World.
Welcome and a heartfelt thank you all those who have kindly left a donation or taken out a paid subscription to my Substack page.
Whilst we are able to hear and see what is around us, that does not prove we are in a natural world, in which events unfold randomly. The opposite is the case – everything in this construct occurs on a timeline, with events echoing other events with a mathematical and a calendric patterning that can be measured, as demonstrated by the incredible work of Jason Breshears of archaix.com
The Freemasonic Sorcerers who write the scripts for False Flag events can easily predict the responses of the masses. However, they can never predict how the individual rogue being will act.
The Skripal False Flag event – Salisbury, Porton Down connections of Chris Whitty who was also prominent in the Divoc 91 Scamdemic Psy-op as conducted between 2020 and 2022.
Taking the MIC (Military Industrial Complex) – UK ‘Gov’ has been criminally permitting the spraying of the people with all kinds of poisons for at least 70 years now.
Kicker Conspiracy – the freemasonic origins of Association Football – marked contrast to its original form. It’s all about rules and regulations, occultic ritual, psychological manipulation and energy harvesting, in all its forms.
Energy harvesting via stirring up of opposing football crowd energies, magnetic polarities, cash-credit extraction via merchandising all offered up to the false god of Freemasonry, Jah-Bal-On.
It is all psychological manipulation, distraction and football is but another version of bread and circuses – all to the benefit of the controllers, the freemasonic sorcerers and script writers, or the predictive programmers of this perceived reality.
The hypnotic effect of TV and the induced suggestive state wherein the individual is open to receiving any and all propaganda, having no ability to think critically, he is easily influenced
I also have a strange encounter with a man who falsely believes filming in public places, in this case the woods, cannot take place without his permission.
As is always the case, the question is, who is writing the scripts and directing the action?
Thank you for listening.
Should you be able to support me during this time of my debanking, please consider chucking a few quid into the pot via the BuyMeACoffee button and/or taking out a paid subscription at my Substack page.
Have I been debanked over my eccentric views on life? For being a philosopher? (A Lover of Wisdom?)
Doubtful whether it could be my political views as I consider all politicians to be puppets in a uni-party fake democracy. Two cheeks of the same arse, in other words.
Keir Stalin meets the Don in the White House and his effete body language, as he sits cross-legged like a girl.
JD Vance makes point about the tyrannical treatment and abuse of UK people who are deemed to have written hurtful social media posts which may upset certain protected peoples currently residing like cuckoos in thousands of nests across the lands of Britain.
In reply, Starmer lied by saying freedom of speech is and has always been valued in the UK. A dishonourable untruth.
The ridiculous On line Harms Act and associated Warrant Officers [PIC]
Dave’s mortgage case – Mr Laville and the forged affidavit. [PICS]. How forgery is a criminal act at Common Law.
The world is a magical fiction – ‘time’ is not linear
Good art will express eternal truths through its fictions
My debanking experience – my sincere appreciate for all the donations and the insightful comments.
The Truth of Good Art –
The Truth is Beauty, Beauty is Truth
Thank you for listening.
Should you be able to support me during this time of my debanking, please consider chucking a few quid into the pot via the BuyMeACoffee button and/or taking out a paid subscription at my Substack page.
What follows is a redacted account of how a False Lender, in this case, the Defendant (D) the Nationwide Building Society, apparently Forged the Claimant’s Affidavit in a hearing at Hull County Court.
Whilst I have written extensively on the various frauds of the banks, with particular regard to the void Deed of Mortgage, which is a fraud on its face, and I have seen many examples of banks committing fraud by using so-called robo-signers to forge people’s signatures, never have I seen a Defendant, in this case a Financial institution, seek to rely on a forged document in an actual Court hearing (other than a mortgage deed, a non-existent loan agreement and false statements of moneys being loaned that is).
At least that was the case until just last week. Regular readers may recall the matter of my friend Dave who turned around a possession claim by making a new application as the Claimant (with the Nationwide [NW] as the Defendant).
He was asking the court to issue a legal declaration that the Mortgage Deed the fake lender relied upon to get a possession order was illegal, along with the purported loan agreement as both demonstrably failed to comply with sections 1 and 2 of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1989 [LPMP Act].
After receiving the Claim, the Defendant (D), the NW, went into full defensive mode. Firstly, a para-legal or solicitor going by the name Vandrewalla entered a false witness statement – as a mere employee at a third party company, he is manifestly not legally qualified to declare or claim, under oath, that any amount is owed on the simple basis he is not a duly appointed officer of the lender.
Indeed, this very fact was established in a case from Northern Ireland, Dermody,
In Dermody the High Court dismissed the claim of the plaintiff bank (Ulster Bank Ireland Limited (“UBIL”)) in circumstances where the person swearing the affidavit setting out the bank’s evidence was an employee of a third party (which was a related company charged with the collection of debts due to UBIL) and had been authorised by UBIL pursuant to a power of attorney to swear the affidavit. This decision is in line with the High Court’s decision in Bank of Scotland plc v Stapleton [2012] IEHC 549 regarding Certus, the servicer charged with the management of the loans due to Bank of Scotland plc.
The cumulative effect of these High Court decisions is that:
• The records of the bank are inadmissible save where the provisions of the Act are complied with.
• The evidence must be provided by an employee of the bank and not a representative of some other company to whom the task of collecting the debt has been outsourced.
• It remains open to the person in the bank who created the original document to give direct evidence.
Source: Ulster Bank Ireland Limited v Dermody, [2014] IEHC 140 and ACC Bank plc v Byrne & Others, Unreported, 31 July 2014, which held that the business records of a bank were inadmissible as evidence of the truth of their contents save where the rigorous provisions of the Act were complied with.
Dave rebutted Vandrewalla’s witness statement in a subsequent Affidavit.
In the meantime, the D appointed a barrister, ‘Dodgy’ Roger Laville, from the Inner Temple who bombarded him with a 134 page bundle of documents, just one hour before the scheduled hearing at Hull County Court.
Mr Laville, a barrister from the Inner Temple, relied upon a forged affidavit in order to sway a court judgement in favour of his client, the Nationwide.
What happened next is astonishing, if not surprising.
An earlier Affidavit (see below) which Dave had entered into the Court in defence of the original possession claim was specifically cited by the presiding judge as being inadmissible on the ground it had not been notarised and witnessed.
When Dave got home, having heard the same judge dismiss his claim, he went through his paperwork and noticed that the Affidavit in question had been forged: some agent of the NW had removed the notary signature and seal from the document in order to make it appear that it had not been witnessed and notarised.
Before taking a look at the offending forgery, let us consider what the definition of forgery is. Bouviers Law Dictionary, on this occasion, provides us with an excellent and suitable definition,
FORGERY, crim. law. Forgery at common law has been held to be
“the fraudulent making and alteration of a writing to the prejudice of another man’s right.” 4 Bl. Com. 247.
By a more modern writer, it is defined, as ” a false making; a making malo animo, of any written instrument, for the purpose of fraud and deceit.” 2 East, P. C. 852.
2. This offence at common law is of the degree of a misdemeanour. 2 Russel, 1437. There are many kinds of forgery, especially subjected to punishment by statutes enacted by the national and state legislatures.
3. The subject will be considered, with reference, .1. To the making or alteration requisite to constitute forgery. 2. The written instruments in respect of which forgery may be committed. 3. The fraud and deceit to the prejudice of another man’s right.
UK ‘Gov’ legislation has this to state,
Forgery and Counterfeiting Act 1981 section 9, check out s.9(2) false if altered 9
Meaning of “false” and “making”.
(1) An instrument is false for the purposes of this Part of this Act—
(a) if it purports to have been made in the form in which it is made by a person who did not in fact make it in that form; or
(b ) if it purports to have been made in the form in which it is made on the authority of a person who did not in fact authorise its making in that form; or
(c) if it purports to have been made in the terms in which it is made by a person who did not in fact make it in those terms; or
(d) if it purports to have been made in the terms in which it is made on the authority of a person who did not in fact authorise its making in those terms.
(2) A person is to be treated for the purposes of this Part of this Act as making a false instrument if he alters an instrument so as to make it false in any respect (whether or not it is false in some other respect apart from that alteration).
“What is the common element in all these cases? It is, I think, best expressed in the definition given by East in his Pleas of the Crown, vol 2, page 822. He treats the subject, I think, better than any writer before or since:
“To forge (a metaphorical expression borrowed from the occupation of the smith) means, properly speaking, no more than to make or form: but in our law it is always taken in an evil sense; and therefore Forgery at common law denotes a false making (which includes every alteration of or addition to a true instrument), a making malo animo, of any written instrument for the purpose of fraud and deceit. This definition results from all the authorities ancient and modern taken together.”
Here are the before and after screenshots of the forged affidavit Mr Laville, the barrister, relied upon in order to falsely allege that Dave’s affidavit had not been notarised when it most demonstrably had.
BEFORE THE FORGERY
AFTER THE FORGERY
For those who understand these matters and for those who don’t, let me express what this means as succinctly as I am able,
On the face of it, and until it may be disproven, the use the manifestly forged affidavit appears to be an act of criminality, committed by the Nationwide BS and/or its agents who have used a forgery, as defined at Law, in order to persuade a District Judge to issue a false judgement in their favour.
Dodgy Roger is not so much in hot water as being gently boiled in a hot tub of mushy peas.
Oh dear, Roger, oh dear.
Please take note that I don’t doubt the influence of the Freemasonic Inner Temple, to which he almost certainly belongs, to be able to cover up for him and pull him out of the hot tub, the truth is that this blatant use of a forged affidavit to gain a pyrrhic victory for the D has to be rather damaging to his, no doubt, highly esteemed ‘reputation’, and, for that reason alone, I would encourage sharing this essay with anyone who may find its contents of interest to them.
Pyrrhic
adjective [attributive] (of a victory) won at too great a cost to have been worthwhile for the victor.
In any event, given my unlawful debanking experience with the Co-op Bank, I will continue to expose the fraud of the financiers as and when it comes to my attention.
In the meantime, and should you be able to support me during this time of my debanking, please consider chucking a few quid into the pot via the BuyMeACoffee button and/or taking out a paid subscription at my Substack page.
Thank you to all my supporters – it’s truly appreciated.
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
