PREMIERES IN LONDON & MANCHESTER
Weekend of 17th and 18th December, 2016.
Introduction: The Rise and Fall of an Idiocracy.
The historical facts surrounding the centuries’ old influence of the Phoenicians, the Venetians, the Sabbatean Frankists, the House of Rothschild (HOR), the fake Crown, the West and East India Companies international drug operations and the planetary manipulations of the Council for Foreign Relations (CFR) have resulted in us living in a system of control which is only as strong as its weakest links. SOURCE MATERIAL
Given the factual dumbing down of the populace that has occurred via the established means of miseducation, brain-washing, Cultural Marxism, the machinations of the Tavistock institute, television, the double-speak of the Main Stream Media (MSM), the bread and circus distractions, vaccinations-for-mind-fucking and disability and all other indoctrination systems promulgated from numerous sources, is it really surprising that in these times it is as though we are wading up to our knees in the thick treacle of an idiocracy?
An idiocracy which, in line with its communist origins, reduces everything to the lowest common denominator?
An idiocracy may be defined thus:
“a form of government in which a country or territory is run by fools”
Example Sentence: “Some democracies can turn into idiocracies depending on the election results.” http://www.wordcentral.com/byod/byod_search.php?term=idiocracy
Or, as the 2006 film of the same title is described,
“a dystopian society where advertising, commercialism, and cultural anti-intellectualism have run rampant, and is devoid of intellectual curiosity, social responsibility, and coherent notions of justice and human rights.”
RM states this in the light of yet another unenlightening encounter in a County Court last Wednesday with a young solicitor who might, at best, be termed an ‘apologist’ for those who support the continuation of the Great British Mortgage Swindle – viz, a mere hireling in the employ of the notorious Leeds firm known as Walker Morris. At worst, she could be termed a cerebrally challenged legal whore who would be out of her depth in a puddle. Harsh, perhaps, but given the circumstances, not unfair.
When she was reminded that the mortgagor was more than willing to settle the alleged amount owed upon being provided with proof of the debt, a valid deed and contract, as required at law and a valid power of attorney, she responded by reading from a piece of paper that “Heldon vs Strathmore” established that a deed is not caught by section 2 of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1989 (LPMPA)
No shit, Sherlock, no shit. It is, of course, section 1.3 of LPMPA that relates to the requirement for a deed to be validly executed. Section 2, concerns the contractual obligation for both parties to enter into a valid agreement (contract) for a mortgage and it must be signed by all parties.
Interestingly, in the cited case, it was ‘Lord Neuberger’, the ‘Master of the Rolls’, a Rothschild acolyte who presides over the British judiciary, who made the ruling in favour of the banks, by way of the usual sophistry that goes hand-in-hand with his role as apologist for the HOR.
“Born on 10 January 1948, Lord Neuberger was educated at Westminster School, later studied Chemistry at Christ Church, Oxford. After graduating he worked at the merchant bank, N M Rothschild & Sons from 1970-1973 until he entered Lincoln’s Inn and was called to the Bar in 1974.” source
I’ll not besmirch this site by quoting him but will simply point out that he has a mirror acolyte for the HOR to be found in the shape of Benjamin Wood, a barrister at 4Square Chambers, who previously worked at the same Rothschild bank before taking up the wig and becoming employed as a ‘hitman’ who is engaged (at considerable expense) by the banks whenever a mortgagor gets too close to exposing the racket of his masters.
“Before coming to the Bar, Ben worked at Procter & Gamble and then joined NM Rothschild & Sons, where he worked as a corporate finance adviser. Whilst at Rothschild in the European Mergers and Acquisitions team, Ben was involved in numerous transactions, notably the £2bn Marks & Spencer restructuring and European store disposals and the ECJ determination of the Competition Commissioner’s prohibition of the takeover of Sidel by Tetra Laval.” source
It is fair to state that RM has examined a large number of mortgage deeds and associated documents over the last 7 years and, in all that time, has never seen a contract that has complied with the requirements of the law of mortgages. They do not exist. In fact, there is never anything at all that has been signed by a duly authorised officer of the bank.
Not even an offer of mortgage advance letter. Nothing. Zilch.
All that is seemingly required is your signature. The invaluable autograph of the real creditor in the illusory deal.
Now why might that be the case? Is it because, in reality, there is never a binding offer of a loan, no meeting of the minds and no full disclosure as to how the loan is created? And, obviously, no consideration from the bank/mortgagee?
In short, it is a chimera. A sham. The illusion of a loan underpins it all. The deceit is entirely dependent upon the licenced banks’ ability to create the credit ‘out of thin air’ and the complacent negligence of a conveyancing industry whose solicitors are hopelessly conflicted in their interests as they are simultaneously representing the mortgagor and mortgagee. It is an industry occupied by foolish individuals who have no understanding of credit creation and the lawful requirements of a valid mortgage. Without that knowledge, how can it be anything less than another component in what amounts to an idiocracy?
The logical conclusion is that this is the state we find ourselves in.
The solicitor I met last Wednesday also claimed:
“There doesn’t need to be a contract for a mortgage.”
The illogicality of this statement is breathtaking. Stunning in its stupidity. This is why RM ’s view that the legal system is in meltdown only gets strengthened over time. A culture of stupidity rules, ok?
The rise and fall of civilisations are marked by certain characteristics, as succinctly posited here.
To return to the Great British Mortgage Swindle.
As well as its operation as a financial instument – a promise to pay which is used to hypothecate the mortgagor’s future earnings, the mortgage deed exists as a demonstrably false receipt.
How? Ok, say I was going to loan someone a grand. What do you think would happen if I were to suggest that, before I made the loan, I asked them to sign a receipt for one thousand quid, in which they acknowledged that they were already the debtor without having received the money from me yet? And, that I said I also reserved the right not to make the loan?
Or that, first of all, they were to write me a cheque which I would then deposit in a special account and then attempt to pretend that I was funding the loan myself and not from that self same cheque? Would an intelligent individual not laugh in my face and tell me, not unreasonably, to fuck off?
The mortgage deed is a pledge. A promise to pay. It is a financial instrument in and of itself. It is as good as cash to a banker. End of.
In this sense, the mortgagor is advised to sign a receipt, in which he acknowledges he is the debtor to the bank. Before any purported loan or ‘advance’ has been made. It is a well-oiled ‘bait and switch’ move. Tempted by the prospect of ‘owning’ the house, he is drawn into an unconscionable deal in which his position is switched round from creditor to debtor.
Another way to view it is this. Imagine, by way of analogy, that I went to a bank manager and said to him, ‘Right, I am going to make a deposit of one million pounds. I cannot say when but it will be sometime in the future. Could you be so kind as to sign this receipt, whereby you acknowledge you have received the money. But don’t date it , cos I will fill that in later.”
Would the outraged bank manager not tell you to leave immediately? Yet, that is a mirror situation to the one in which an individual is placed when he signs the mortgage deed without dating it.
Thus, the conveyancing solicitor instructs him to enter into a wager-at-law, a gamble that, were the bank to renege, would leave him high and dry, in debt with nothing to show for it.
These elements are, of course, what takes it into the realms of crime.
However, in truth, the game is up, regardless of all those fuckwits who continue to act as apologists for the deception and engage in slurring others who simply point out the facts of the matter – namely, that the mortgagor cannot put a charge on a property that is not his at the moment he signs the false deed of mortgage and that no moneys are ever loaned. Any suggestion that an equitable charge is created is thus fallacious.
The facts are stark:
- Under section 24 of the Land Registration Act 2002 a mortgagor is only capable of granting a legal charge if he is registered as the proprietor of the property concerned, or entitled to be, having completed the purchase of it.
- Under section 1(3) of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 a mortgage deed has to be signed by a mortgagor in the presence of a witness, who must attest to the signature.
- Under the provisions of that section of the 1989 Act, it is impossible for the Land Registry to register a legal mortgage that is not dated.
- Since that’s not possible, an undated deed is void and illegal, whereas a dated deed that is properly made and delivered as a deed, in accordance with section 1 of the 1989 Act, is legally valid and capable of registration.
- On the basis that it would be illegal to register it if it wasn’t dated, adding the date after signature constitutes a material alteration of the deed, on the ground that the alteration transforms a void and illegal deed into a legal charge that is capable of registration on its face.
- The staff at the LR falsely presume that the date on every mortgage deed is the date upon which the mortgagor signed the legal charge deed.
- All mortgage deeds are void under section 52(1) of the Law of Property Act 1925, in the absence of completion at the moment of execution on the ground that no material alterations can be made to the deed after signature.
- No mortgage or charge can arise without a mortgage contract being signed by both parties and containing all terms in a single document, as per the Court of Appeal decision in United Bank of Kuwait v Sahib .
How is the film, TGBMS – the antidote to the idiocracy?
In spite of all of the foregoing and the control of the #FakeNews MSM by a handful of controllers whose links to the Council for Foreign Relations (CFR) are crystal clear, genuine media production is on an inevitable rise.
#TheGreatBritishMortgageSwindle is an independent production that is part of that rise. Notwithstanding RM’s involvement in its production, all readers of these pages are encouraged to make the effort to go and see it in a local cinema.
Because it is one of the most intelligent films you will ever see.
Not only does it contain swathes of real life drama, unlawful evictions shot in an engaging guerrilla style, but it also challenges the viewer to use his intelligence to keep up with the points of law and the expose of a monstrous swindle that is dependent entirely upon the ignorance of the people. And, just in case there is any doubt, that applies to some 11.2 million mortgagors across these lands.
Ultimately, the name of the game is freedom. Freedom from financial enslavement.
If you’re in London or Manchester this weekend and want to enjoy an uplifting cinematic experience with like-minded folk, then RM urges you to get tickets for the screenings before they sell out. Here are the box office links:
LONDON PREMIERE Saturday, 1pm Arthouse Cinema, Crouch End.
MANCHESTER PREMIERE Sunday, 3pm, Moston Small Cinema.
If you’ve had a gutful of the idiocracy, of the lies of the MSM and want to support the work of independent film makers whose productions blow apart the lies and deceptions of the rigged system, then get off the settee, turn off the television and head down to the screening. RM promises you won’t be disappointed and, who knows which like-minded intelligent people you’ll meet?
Acknowledgements to David R, Rhys J, Jan B, Brian V, and Steven K for their kind donations.
Anyone who appreciates the work of RM is encouraged to make a donation. Please give what you can. As always, it will be greatly appreciated.