The facts of the matter are plain for anyone with a functioning brain:
In common usage, theft is the taking of another person’s property without that person’s permission or consent with the intent to deprive the rightful owner of it.”
On 02 July, 2015, the Crawford Family was subjected to a violent theft of the family home of 26 years and the property inside the home was stolen by unidentified individuals who assisted Liam Fox, the owner of a removal company in Lytham St Annes, Lancashire to load up his van. It was theft on the simple basis that it was taken without the owners’ consent and subsequently deprived them of their home.
On that basis, the actions of the conspirators who planned and executed ‘Operation Hooper’, which includes (without limitation) Notts Police Force, the County Court, the local Council, the agents of Walker Morris and the officers of UKAR/ the Bradford and Bingley were criminal.
Theft is not theft when it is carried out by those working for the State-Corporate Machine, who employ unknown persons to commit the act.
Of course, theft is theft so that assertion is a logical fallacy. Groups of individuals cannot get together and grant each other powers to carry out violent thefts such as this; so what is it that those in fake positions of authority believe gives them the right to conduct such an operation?
In the simplest of terms, it is Statism: the dangerous superstition that violence can be legitimate, predicated on the false notion that ‘might is right’ when it is carried out for and on behalf of the ‘state’ by its ‘licensed’ agents.
Each and every man and woman who turned out to assist the Crawford family in its terrible hour of need was acting with the good faith intention that the theft be prevented. This is how and why, though outnumbered by those in the colours and costumes of the police, they attempted to prevent the removal van leaving the scene of the crime. A crime was taking place in front of them and they had, one might reasonably posit, a public duty to do that which they knew to be the right thing.
The individuals acting as ‘constables’ that day who assisted in the operation are culpable for their actions. Aiding and abetting a crime remains an indictable offence:
The Accessories and Abettors Act 1861 provides that an accessory to an indictable offence shall be treated in the same way as if he had actually committed the offence himself. Section 8 of the Act, as amended, reads:
“Whosoever shall aid, abet, counsel, or procure the commission of any indictable offence, whether the same be an offence at common law or by virtue of any Act passed or to be passed, shall be liable to be tried, indicted, and punished as a principal offender.”
It was no surprise, therefore, that a lawfully convened Grand Jury of the People of Nottingham, having heard first hand testimony to the criminality at work on 02 July, 2015, returned a unanimous declaration that there was a case to answer that the eviction was unlawful.
Non-violent action was taken by the people present in order to prevent a crime taking place. Namely, the theft of the Crawford family property in Fox’s removal van.
Given reasonable force is defined as applying to self defence only, and not acts of aggression, the constables’ use of kettling tactics against those individuals, who were in any event out-numbered by the police, was not lawful.
To date the court officials, judges and their assorted statist acolytes who inhabit the virtual reality world where violence, fraud and extortion are shamelessly justified, have ignored and/or poured ridicule on the notion that a Grand Jury could even exist, let alone be capable of delivering an entirely valid declaration which the courts are obliged to taken action on.
Meanwhile, further West, the news that Seattle council took out an audit into mass mortgage fraud in the city, vindicates the legal arguments that have been put forward by the co-producers of The Great British Mortgage Swindle and which feature in the film, is the fly in the ointment for all those who have emptied the shallow swill of their statist ‘thinking’ into the cesspit of a degenerate system which is, particularly in these lands, staggering drunkenly into mistake upon mistake. Can the reader imagine, say, Nottingham City Council ordering a detailed mass audit of all banks who have been unlawfully claiming possession against people’s homes, a process that is rubber stamped by the notorious County Court?
Yet, without a lawful contract, signed by all parties, there can be no valid consent. On top of which, there is the undeniable fact that the bank’s expensive barrister, Nicole Sandells, could not verify that the amount owed was a valid one. Not even Nigel Godsmark, a man acting as a judge on 01 May, 2015 could ignore that fact.
Of course, there is also the accounting fact that the Crawfords were the creditors of the bank – it was, after all, their signatures and promise to pay that created the credit in the first place to buy the bungalow.
The misrepresentation of this fact lies at the heart of the Great British Mortgage Swindle, an entirely genocidal practice whereby people are thrown violently out of their homes on the false basis that they debtors, who have a valid obligation to pay the bank moneys earned from their sweat equity based on the lie that they are indebted and that there was a valid agreement (contract) in place.
TGBMS, the practice, not the film, has all the classic ingredients of a classic smoke and mirrors operation, a scam so deeply embedded into the state-corporate system of control(s) that, when all else fails, it has nothing left to rely on other than the brutal and bovine tactics of a private army of duped individuals who, if brains were dynamite, couldn’t blow their helmets off. Individuals who have sworn to serve and protect the people but who, in fact, are serving and protecting the vested interests of the City of London and all agencies operating under the aegis of the Crown House of Rothschild.
Without this private bovine army, the state-corporate is fecked. Without the assistance of the police, none of this theft would take place.
These former soldiers woke up to reality of their employment as henchmen for the interests of a ‘Crown’ whose fraudulent peddling of the old ‘Queen and country’ myth they mistakenly swallowed-
The reality is that the brand known as the Crown never had any legitimacy and was, in any event, infiltrated by the banking family known as Rothschild, whose central banking monopoly was evidently threatened by those countries like Iraq, Libya, Syria and Afghanistan et al who refused to comply and/or were sitting on natural assets like gas, oil and/or heroin that the ‘Crown’ deals in (not to mention its world-wide wheeling and dealing in depleted uranium, used in the bombs made in GB, to enable to the mass genocide of hundreds of thousands of men, women and children).
The most absurd apology for authority and law is that they serve to diminish crime. Aside from the fact that the State is itself the greatest criminal, breaking every written and natural law, stealing in the form of taxes, killing in the form of war and capital punishment, it has come to an absolute standstill in coping with crime. It has failed utterly to destroy or even minimize the horrible scourge of its own creation.”
The schism that exists in the minds and hearts of those who operate as judges, barristers and solicitors lies in the fact that they invariably defend the interests of the white collar criminals and those who operate under ‘licence’ from the state, as if the state had, in reality, the power to permit unlawful/criminality, providing it is undertaken by a giant financial institution, a council, HMRC, politicians and/or those involved from the fake higher echelons of ‘power’ who engage in despicable acts against children. To defend the indefensible is to descend into a maelstrom of lies, and cover ups which invariably will cause psychological and/or spiritual harm to the one so employed. In other words, it fucks up their heads.
Some take the view that the pederast behaviour of those who rape children is the glue that binds it all together; at least in so far as it creates a system of control whereby compromised individuals, are open to bribery and forced to carry out the bidding of the ‘masters’ if they do not wish to be exposed for whatever crimes or misdemeanors they have committed. Thus, they are owned; thus they act as puppets for their masters.
Inevitably, these puppets are clearly not fit for purpose. Take for instance the Crown Persecution Service. When the discreditable BBC runs a 30 minute radio programme on how the CPS is in meltdown, with understaffing issues, miscarriages of justice and over-bearing workloads for those who work in its oppressive environs, it is fair to say that the ice berg of its incompetence is beginning to appear. 29 years in existence, how much longer before it collapses?
Meanwhile, across both the civil and criminal justice system, rail roadings are a daily occurrence and, inevitably, grave miscarriages of justice are the result of the entire ‘Crown’ judiciary’s failure to grasp the mettle and do the right thing by the people. But maybe that is simply further evidence of how each and every one of them is compromised – perhaps by money or by some action they do not want to come out into the harsh light of public scrutiny.
In the meantime, one has to ask what of those who are facing malicious prosecution by the same brand, the ‘Crown’ on trumped up charges pertaining to the events of the 2nd of July, 2015?
Firstly, the Grand Jury declared that those charges be dropped on the basis that there is a case to answer that the eviction was unlawful. The travesty is that each of the people who attended in support of the Crawfords on 02 July, 2015 were acting in good faith to prevent the theft of the Crawford family’s property by a man called Liam and his bunch of daylight robbers from Lytham St Annes.
The fact is the police were there fraudulently. Their so-called Evidence Gatherers failed to film the real crime going on behind them at the scene of a violent attack on the Crawfords and filmed the people who were in attendance that day, not as ‘protestors’ but as extra-ordinary men and women who simply wanted to help prevent another criminal eviction from taking place. Some statists may well claim that the police actions were not unlawful and that they were simply doing their job. This is of course, the myopic view of a statist. They pretended that it was all ‘legal’, that the family didn’t even need to be notified of the eviction, that operation Hooper (incidentally, this is the name of the Clerk to the Justices, Graham Hooper of Nottingham Magistrates Court – just a coincidence?) was justified as Tom had ‘lost his case’ and not suffered a grave miscarriage of justice.
The clueless (or should that be cloth-eared) inspectors who gaggled there on the day, with their thumbs in their bra-waistcoats, and their brains up their arses, were informed that the eviction was unlawful on the simple basis that there was no warrant, no due process and that the bank had fraudulently claimed an amount it could not verify, a fact noted by Nigel Godsmark, QC, who has been acting as senior judge at Nottingham County Court since the retirement of the disgraced Richard ‘Dickie’ Inglis over 2 years ago.
And again, they ignored it, unwisely choosing instead to side with the bank and help a bunch of criminals escape from the scene of the crime and, in so doing, violently attack a body of good men and women who were each acting in the public spirit of those who will stand up to what is simply wrongdoing. In this sense, each and every one of them was in breach of his oath to ‘serve and protect’ the people, without ‘fear or favour’ because they, without any investigation, chose to believe what they were told by the faux authorities. Unless, of course, the oath is, in fact, a promise to protect the interests of their paymasters, the Crown State of Rothschild.
All of which leads us to the preposterous situation of the ‘Evidence Gatherers’ filming the law abiding people who were attempting to prevent a crime taking place, whilst ignoring their cohorts assist the removal van containing the stolen property flee the scene of the crime in broad daylight.
People act differently in the heat of the moment, as is to be expected, for is it not each Man’s unique trip, a journey ladened with learning opportunities provided by any mistakes he may make along the route of self-discovery?
Thus, it is hard to ignore the facts.
Ignorant people who use violence against others, to push, bully, intimidate, threaten, physically hurt and grapple are the real villains in this piece of statist genocide. It matters not if they are wearing a costume of some fluorescent hue. A thug is thug is a thug. Wrong is wrong.
And theft is theft, no matter who commits it.
Footnote: if any one is able to make a donation, no matter how small, it will be greatly appreciated as the fact is that right now, RM is somewhat skint. To misquote the song, ‘if you haven’t got a tenner, a fiver will do, if you ain’t got a fiver, then god bless you.”